This application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/386,886 filed Sep. 27, 2010, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
1. Field of the Invention
The present disclosure relates to ventilation systems, and more particularly to so-called Above Sheathing Ventilation (ASV) systems.
2. Description of the Related Art
Ventilation of a building has numerous benefits for both the building and its occupants. For example, ventilation of an attic space can prevent the attic's temperature from rising to undesirable levels, which also reduces the cost of cooling the interior living space of the building. In addition, increased ventilation in an attic space tends to reduce the humidity within the attic, which can prolong the life of lumber used in the building's framing and elsewhere by diminishing the incidence of mold and dry-rot. Moreover, ventilation promotes a more healthful environment for residents of the building by encouraging the introduction of fresh, outside air. Also, building codes and local ordinances typically require ventilation and dictate the amount of required ventilation. Most jurisdictions require a certain amount of “net free ventilating area,” which is a well-known and widely used measure of ventilation.
An important type of ventilation is Above Sheathing Ventilation (ASV), which is ventilation of an area within a roof above the sheathing or roof deck, such as in a batten cavity between the top of the roof deck and the underside of the tiles. Increasing ASV has the beneficial effect of cooling the batten cavity and reducing the amount of radiant heat that can transfer into the structure of the building, such as an attic space. By reducing the transfer of radiant heat into the building, the structure can stay cooler and require less energy for cooling (e.g., via air conditioners).
In many areas, buildings are at risk of exposure to wildfires. Wildfires can generate firebrands, or burning embers, as a byproduct of the combustion of materials in a wildfire. These embers can travel, airborne, up to one mile or more from the initial location of the wildfire, which increases the severity and scope of the wildfire. One way wildfires can damage buildings is when embers from the fire land either on or near a building. Likewise, burning structures produce embers, which can also travel along air currents to locations removed from the burning structures and pose hazards similar to embers from wildfires. Embers can ignite surrounding vegetation and/or building materials that are not fire-resistant. Additionally, embers can enter the building through foundation vents, under-eave vents, soffit vents, gable end vents, and dormer or other types of traditional roof field vents. Embers that enter the structure can encounter combustible materials and set fire to the building. Fires also generate flames, which can likewise set fire to or otherwise damage buildings when they enter the building's interior through vents.
In accordance with one embodiment, a roof structure comprises a roof deck, a layer of roof cover elements spaced above the roof deck to define an air layer between the roof deck and the layer of roof cover elements, and a plurality of vent members each replacing and mimicking an appearance of one or more roof cover elements in the layer of roof cover elements. Each vent member comprises an opening permitting air flow between the air layer and a region above the vent member. The roof deck does not include any openings that permit air flow between the air layer and a region below the roof deck.
In accordance with another embodiment, a roof structure comprises a roof deck, a layer of roof cover elements spaced above the roof deck to define an air layer between the roof deck and the layer of roof cover elements, and a plurality of vent members each replacing and mimicking an appearance of one or more roof cover elements in the layer of roof cover elements. Each vent member comprises an opening permitting air flow between the air layer and a region above the vent member. At least one of the vent members comprises an ember impedance structure that substantially prevents ingress of floating embers through the opening of the vent member while permitting air flow through the opening. The roof deck does not include any openings that permit air flow between the air layer and a region below the roof deck.
In accordance with yet another embodiment, a vented eave riser comprises a barrier wall and an ember impedance structure positioned proximate to the barrier wall. The barrier wall is adapted to fit between a roof deck and a layer of roof cover elements of a roof. The barrier wall comprises one or more openings permitting air flow through the barrier wall. The ember impedance structure substantially prevents ingress of floating embers through the ember impedance structure, while permitting air flow through the ember impedance structure.
In accordance with still another embodiment, a roof structure comprises a roof deck defining an eave, a layer of roof cover elements spaced above the roof deck to define an air layer between the roof deck and the layer of roof cover elements, and at least one vented eave riser positioned at the eave between the roof deck and the layer of roof cover elements. The vented eave riser comprises a barrier wall and an ember impedance structure. The barrier wall has one or more openings permitting air flow through the barrier wall into the air layer. The ember impedance structure is positioned proximate to the openings and within the air layer.
For purposes of summarizing the invention and the advantages achieved over the prior art, certain objects and advantages of the invention have been described above and as further described below. Of course, it is to be understood that not necessarily all such objects or advantages may be achieved in accordance with any particular embodiment of the invention. Thus, for example, those skilled in the art will recognize that the invention may be embodied or carried out in a manner that achieves or optimizes one advantage or group of advantages as taught herein without necessarily achieving other objects or advantages as may be taught or suggested herein.
All of these embodiments are intended to be within the scope of the invention herein disclosed. These and other embodiments of the present invention will become readily apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments having reference to the attached figures, the invention not being limited to any particular preferred embodiment(s) disclosed.
FIG. 7A1 is a cross-sectional view of one embodiment of baffle members for use in a ventilation system.
FIG. 7A2 is a schematic perspective view of a section of the baffle members shown in FIG. 7A1.
FIG. 7A3 is a detail of the cross-sectional view shown in FIG. 7A1.
The roof cover elements 105 and/or the vent members 10 may be supported by a series of battens to create additional airspace beneath the roof cover elements 105 and/or vent members 10. This additional airspace may be referred to as a batten cavity, which is further described below. Air tends to flow into the batten cavity through eave vents or other openings (e.g., soffit vents) along eaves 5, and air tends to exit the batten cavity through the vent members 10. In this arrangement, airflow through the batten cavity may be indicated by the arrow 6.
Typically, the sheathing layer or roof deck 101 is installed on the roof supporting structure 102. The sheathing layer 101 may comprise, for example, a wooden roof deck or metal sheeting. The roof cover elements 105 are laid over and across the sheathing layer 101 or, alternatively, directly on the roof supporting structure 102 (if the sheathing layer is omitted). The illustrated roof cover elements 105 comprise tiles which can be flat in shape. In other embodiments, the tiles may be M-shaped or S-shaped, as known in the art, though it is appreciated that other shapes of tiles may be utilized. Details of common M-shaped and S-shaped tiles are disclosed in U.S. Patent Application Publication No. US 2008/0098672 A1, the entirety of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference. A skilled artisan will appreciate that various other types of covering materials can be used for the roof cover elements 105.
In certain embodiments, the roof 100 may further include battens 103 extending parallel to and between the ridge 4 and the eave 5. The battens may be positioned on the sheathing layer 101 or, alternatively, directly on the roof supporting structure 102 (if the sheathing layer is omitted), while supporting the roof cover elements 105. It will be appreciated that various configurations of battens 103 can be adapted for the roof cover elements 105. In general, techniques for using battens to support tiles and other types of covering elements are well known.
Battens 103 may be configured to create an air layer 104 (also referred to as an “air gap” or “batten cavity”) between the roof deck 101 and the layer of roof cover elements 105. The air layer 104 permits airflow within the roof 100 to produce ASV. Also, the battens 103 can be configured to permit airflow through the battens (e.g., by having perforations). Such battens are referred to as “flow-through battens.” Alternatively or additionally, some or all of the battens 103 may be elevated from the roof deck 101 or other intervening layer(s) by way of spacers or pads (not shown), to permit airflow between the battens and the roof deck. This is referred to as a “raised batten system.” Battens that permit the flow of air upslope or downslope through or across the battens are referred to as “cross battens.” In some embodiments, the battens 103 can be formed of fire resistant materials. Examples of fire resistant materials that may be appropriate for use in battens include metals and metal alloys, such as steel (e.g., stainless steel), aluminum, and zinc/aluminum alloys. Alternately or in addition to employing fire resistant materials for the battens 103, the battens 103 can be treated for fire resistance, such as by applying flame retardants or other fire resistant chemicals to the battens. Fire resistant battens are commercially available from Metroll of Richlands QLD, Australia.
The roof 100 may also include a protective layer 106, such as a fire resistant underlayment, that overlies the roof deck 101. Thus, the protective layer 106 can be interposed between the roof deck 101 and the roof cover elements 105. Fire resistant materials include materials that generally do not ignite, melt or combust when exposed to flames or hot embers. Fire resistant materials include, without limitation, “ignition resistant materials” as defined in Section 702A of the California Building Code, which includes products that have a flame spread of not over 25 and show no evidence of progressive combustion when tested in accordance with ASTM E84 for a period of 30 minutes. Fire resistant materials can be constructed of Class A materials (ASTM E-108, NFPA 256). A fire resistant protective layer appropriate for roofing underlayment is described in PCT App. Pub. No. WO 2001/040568 to Kiik et al., entitled “Roofing Underlayment,” published Jun. 7, 2001, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. In other embodiments, a non-fire resistant underlayment can be used in conjunction with a fire resistant cap sheet that overlies or encapsulates the underlayment. In still other embodiments, the protective layer 106 can be omitted.
Additionally, the layer of roof cover elements 105 may comprise a plurality of non-vent elements (e.g., roof tiles) and a plurality of vent members (also referred to as “secondary vent members,” “cover layer vent members,” and the like), such as the illustrated vent members 110. Each vent member 110 may preferably replace one or more non-vent elements in accordance with a repeating engagement pattern of the roof cover elements 105 for engaging one another. The vent member 110 may be configured to mimic an appearance of the replaced one or more roof cover elements 105 so as to visually blend into the appearance of the roof 100. In particular, the vent member 110 may have substantially the same shape as that of the replaced one or more roof cover elements 105, for example, tiles or shingles. Furthermore, each vent member 110 preferably includes openings (such as the illustrated openings 115) permitting air flow between the regions above and below the vent member 110, i.e., between the area above the roof and the air gap 104. To reduce the likelihood of ingress of embers or flames through the openings 115, the openings 115 may include one or more baffles as described in U.S. Patent App. Pub. No. 2009/0286463 to Daniels, published Nov. 19, 2009, the entirety of which is incorporated herein by reference.
In another embodiment illustrated in
In
Generally, the barrier wall 132 has an upper edge 132a whose profile substantially matches a profile of the undersides of the roof cover elements 105. The edge 132a of the barrier wall 132 may in some embodiments support the roof cover elements 105. By having a profile that substantially matches the profile of the roof cover elements 105, the vented eave riser 130 substantially closes the space 108. As a result, the vented eave riser 130 can substantially inhibit the ingress of undesired elements such as insects, vermin, leaves, debris, wind-driven precipitation, and floating embers or flames into the space 108.
Nevertheless, as illustrated in
The vented eave riser 130 may be made of any suitable material for the outdoor environment. For example, the vented eave riser may be formed of galvanized steel or aluminum.
The mesh material 150 can be secured to the barrier wall 132 and/or the base 131 by any of a variety of methods. In some embodiments, the vented eave riser 130 includes one or more fingers or other structures 135 extending upward from the base 131 towards the uppermost edge 132a of the barrier wall 132, the fingers 135 helping to retain the mesh material 150 against the barrier wall 132. Alternatively, the mesh material 150 can be secured to the barrier wall 132 by other methods including, without limitation, adhesion, welding, and the like.
The mesh material 150 can substantially inhibit the ingress of floating embers while maintaining air flow through the openings 133. Compared to baffle systems described below, the mesh material 150 may provide even greater ventilation. The baffle system restricts the amount of NFVA under the ICC Acceptance Criteria for Attic Vents—AC132. Under AC132, the amount of NFVA is calculated at the smallest or most critical cross-sectional area of the airway of the vent. Sections 4.1.1 and 4.1.2 of AC132 (February 2009) read as follows:
“4.1.1. The net free area for any airflow pathway (airway) shall be the gross cross-sectional area less the area of any physical obstructions at the smallest or most critical cross-sectional area in the airway. The net free area shall be determined for each airway in the installed device.”
“4.1.2. The NFVA for the device shall be the sum of the net free areas determined for all airways in the installed device.”
With reference to
The baffle members 160 may be oriented in a number of different directions depending on the number, size, and shape of the openings 133. As used herein, the x-axis defines a direction parallel to the eave (or at least the portion of the eave at which the eave riser 130 is positioned), the y-axis defines a direction perpendicular to the eave (or at least said eave portion) and parallel to the roof deck (or at least a portion of the roof deck at which the eave riser 130 is positioned), and the z-axis defines a direction perpendicular to the eave (or at least said eave portion) and perpendicular to the roof deck (or at least said roof deck portion). These orientation descriptions are more easily understood if said eave portion is substantially linear and said roof deck portion is substantially planar. For non-linear eaves and non-planar roof decks, these orientations can refer to tangent lines, tangent planes, and normal lines (e.g., a line tangent to the eave, a plane tangent to the roof deck, a line normal to the roof deck, etc.). In the embodiment shown in
The baffle members 160 can be held in their positions relative to each other in various ways, such as through their connection with the barrier wall 132 at the ends 160A and 160B of the baffle members 160 (see
In the embodiment shown in FIGS. 7A1-7A3, air flowing through the baffle members 160 encounters a web or plate portion 161 of a baffle member 160A, and then flows along the web 161 to a passage between flanges or edge portions 162 connected to the webs 161 and 198 (e.g., connected to lateral edges of the webs 161 and 198) of the baffle members 160A and 160B. As shown in FIG. 7A3, air flowing from one side of the baffle members 160 traverses a passage bounded by the flanges 162, the passage having a width W and a length L. In some embodiments, W can be less than or approximately equal to 2.0 cm, and is preferably within 1.7-2.0 cm. In some embodiments, L can be greater than or approximately equal to 2.5 cm (or greater than 2.86 cm), and is preferably within 2.5-6.0 cm, or more narrowly within 2.86-5.72 cm. Also, with reference to FIG. 7A3, the angle α between the webs 161 and the flanges 162 is preferably less than 90 degrees, and more preferably less than 75 degrees.
In the embodiment shown in
The embodiment shown in
With continued reference to
Further, in the embodiments shown in
In some embodiments, such as shown in
In some embodiments, the outer baffle member 160B includes a pair of inwardly extending edge portions 162 connected at opposing sides of the outer portion 198. Further, the inner baffle member 160A can include a pair of outwardly extending edge portions 162 connected at opposing sides of the inner portion 192. The vented eave riser 130 can also include a second elongated outer baffle member 160B configured similarly to the first elongated outer baffle member 160B and having a longitudinal axis that is substantially parallel to the longitudinal axis of the first lower baffle member 160B. One of the edge portions 162 of the first outer baffle member 160B and a first of the edge portions 162 of the inner baffle member 160A can overlap to form a narrow passage therebetween. Further, one of the edge portions 162 of the second outer baffle member 160B and a second of the edge portions 162 of the inner baffle member 160A can overlap to form a second narrow passage therebetween, such that at least some of the air flowing through the ember and/or flame impedance structure traverses a circuitous path partially formed by the second narrow passage.
Although
The baffle members cause air flowing from one side of the baffle member to another side to traverse a flow path. In some embodiments, such as the configurations shown in
A test was conducted to determine the performance of certain configurations of baffle members 160 that were constructed according to the embodiment illustrated in
The test setup included an ember generator placed over the vent being tested, and a combustible filter media was positioned below the tested vent. A fan was attached to the vent to generate an airflow from the ember generator and through the vent and filter media. One hundred grams of dried pine needles were placed in the ember generator, ignited, and allowed to burn until extinguished, approximately two and a half minutes. The combustible filter media was then removed and any indications of combustion on the filter media were observed and recorded. The test was then repeated with the other vents. Table 1 below summarizes the results of the test, as well as the dimensions and net free vent area associated with each tested vent. Net free vent area (NFVA) is discussed in greater detail below, but for the purposes of the tested vents, the NFVA is calculated as the width W1 of the gap between the flanges 162 of adjacent baffle members 160, multiplied by the length of the baffle members 160 (which is 19″ for each of the tested vents), multiplied further by the number of such gaps.
Each of the tested vents offered enhanced protection against ember intrusion, as compared to a baseline setup in which the tested vents are replaced with vents that have a screened opening in place of the baffle members 160. The results in Table 1 indicate that the first tested vent had improved performance for prevention of ember intrusion relative to the second tested vent. Moreover, the first tested vent also had a higher NFVA than the second tested vent.
The results in Table 1 also indicate that the third tested vent offers the best performance for prevention of ember intrusion. It is believed that this is due in part to the fewer number of gaps between adjacent baffle members 160 that were present in the third tested vent, which restricted the paths through which embers could pass. Another factor believed to contribute to the ember resistance of the third tested vent is the greater distance embers had to travel to pass through the vent by virtue of the larger dimensions of the baffle members 160, which may provide a greater opportunity for the embers to extinguish. The third tested vent had the lowest NFVA. The results indicate that a vent having a configuration similar to the third tested vent but having still larger dimensions (e.g., W1=1.0″, W2=2.0″, W3=4.0″) would maintain the ember intrusion resistance while increasing the NFVA relative to the third tested vent. The upper bounds for the dimensions of the baffle member will depend on the type of roof on which the vent is employed, the size of the roof cover elements, and other considerations.
The results of this test indicate that, in a primary vent member 120 (
Consider now the vented eave riser 130 illustrated in
Contrast that with a vented eave riser 130 as shown in
Furthermore,
In some implementations, as shown in
Although this invention has been disclosed in the context of certain preferred embodiments and examples, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that the present invention extends beyond the specifically disclosed embodiments to other alternative embodiments and/or uses of the invention and obvious modifications thereof. Thus, it is intended that the scope of the present invention herein disclosed should not be limited by the particular disclosed embodiments described above, but should be determined only by a fair reading of the claims that follow.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2343764 | Fuller | Mar 1944 | A |
2638835 | Strawsine | May 1953 | A |
2733649 | LeBarron | Feb 1956 | A |
3027090 | Zerhan, Jr. | Mar 1962 | A |
3311047 | Smith et al. | Mar 1967 | A |
3368473 | Sohda et al. | Feb 1968 | A |
3376164 | Baehwansky et al. | Apr 1968 | A |
3598688 | Bellamy | Aug 1971 | A |
3685596 | Collins | Aug 1972 | A |
3780872 | Pall | Dec 1973 | A |
3951336 | Miller et al. | Apr 1976 | A |
4040867 | Forestieri et al. | Aug 1977 | A |
4083097 | Anagnostou et al. | Apr 1978 | A |
4097308 | Klein et al. | Jun 1978 | A |
4189881 | Hawley | Feb 1980 | A |
4201121 | Brandenburg | May 1980 | A |
4224081 | Kawamura et al. | Sep 1980 | A |
4228729 | Messick | Oct 1980 | A |
4239555 | Scharlack et al. | Dec 1980 | A |
4251026 | Siegel et al. | Feb 1981 | A |
4314548 | Hanson | Feb 1982 | A |
4382435 | Brill-Edwards | May 1983 | A |
4383129 | Gupta et al. | May 1983 | A |
4432273 | Devitt | Feb 1984 | A |
4433200 | Jester et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
4574160 | Cull et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
4602739 | Sutton, Jr. | Jul 1986 | A |
D285829 | Lock | Sep 1986 | S |
4625469 | Gentry et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4692557 | Samuelson et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4759272 | Zaniewski | Jul 1988 | A |
4803816 | Klober | Feb 1989 | A |
4843794 | Holtgreve | Jul 1989 | A |
4850166 | Taylor | Jul 1989 | A |
4965971 | Jean-Jacques et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4977818 | Taylor et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
4986469 | Sutton, Jr. | Jan 1991 | A |
4995308 | Waggoner et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5048225 | Brandli | Sep 1991 | A |
5049801 | Potter | Sep 1991 | A |
5060444 | Paquette | Oct 1991 | A |
5078047 | Wimberly | Jan 1992 | A |
5095810 | Robinson | Mar 1992 | A |
5122095 | Wolfert | Jun 1992 | A |
5131200 | McKinnon | Jul 1992 | A |
5131888 | Adkins, II | Jul 1992 | A |
5167579 | Rotter | Dec 1992 | A |
5228925 | Nath et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5232518 | Nath et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5296043 | Kawakami et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5316592 | Dinwoodie | May 1994 | A |
5333783 | Catan | Aug 1994 | A |
5364026 | Kundert | Nov 1994 | A |
5391235 | Inoue | Feb 1995 | A |
5427571 | Sells et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5458538 | MacLeod et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5480494 | Inoue | Jan 1996 | A |
5486238 | Nakagawa et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5505788 | Dinwoodie | Apr 1996 | A |
5528229 | Mehta | Jun 1996 | A |
5620368 | Bates et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5697192 | Inoue | Dec 1997 | A |
5706617 | Hirai et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5722887 | Wolfson et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5740636 | Archard | Apr 1998 | A |
5746653 | Palmer et al. | May 1998 | A |
5746839 | Dinwoodie | May 1998 | A |
5772502 | Smith | Jun 1998 | A |
5814118 | Wickland et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5890322 | Fears | Apr 1999 | A |
5971848 | Nair | Oct 1999 | A |
5990414 | Posnansky | Nov 1999 | A |
6008450 | Ohtsuka et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6050039 | O'Hagin | Apr 2000 | A |
6051774 | Yoshida et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6061978 | Dinwoodie et al. | May 2000 | A |
6077159 | Clayton | Jun 2000 | A |
6105317 | Tomiuchi et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6129628 | O'Hagin et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6155006 | Mimura et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6220956 | Killian et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6227963 | Headrick | May 2001 | B1 |
6241602 | Allen | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6242685 | Mizukami | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6243995 | Reeves et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6277024 | Coulton | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6286273 | Villela et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6294724 | Sasaoka et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6306030 | Wilson | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6308473 | Auck | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6336304 | Mimura et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6361434 | Brandon | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6365824 | Nakazima et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6371847 | Headrick | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6390914 | O'Hagin et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6415559 | Reeves et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6418678 | Rotter | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6439466 | Fikes | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6447390 | O'Hagin | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6453629 | Nakazima et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6491579 | O'Hagin | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6501013 | Dinwoodie | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6541693 | Takada et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6571522 | Perini | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6606830 | Nagao et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6695692 | York | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6780099 | Harper | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6799742 | Nakamura et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6870087 | Gallagher | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6941706 | Austin et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7024828 | Headrick | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7053294 | Tuttle et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7101279 | O'Hagin | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7178295 | Dinwoodie | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7250000 | Daniels, II | Jul 2007 | B2 |
D549316 | O'Hagin et al. | Aug 2007 | S |
7320774 | Simmons et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7469508 | Ceria | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7506477 | Flaherty et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7509775 | Flaherty et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7531740 | Flaherty et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7540118 | Jensen | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7578102 | Banister | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7587864 | McCaskill et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7618310 | Daniels | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7642449 | Korman et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7678990 | McCaskill et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7736940 | Basol | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7882670 | West | Feb 2011 | B2 |
20010027804 | Inoue et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020086634 | Sells | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20030159802 | Steneby et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040098932 | Broatch | May 2004 | A1 |
20050191957 | Demetry et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050239393 | Reese | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050239394 | O'Hagin et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060052047 | Daniels | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060052051 | Daniels, II | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060213767 | Anaf | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060240763 | Takeda | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070067063 | Ahmed | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070072541 | Daniels et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070094953 | Galeazzo et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070173191 | Daniels, II et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070207725 | O'Hagin | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070243820 | O'Hagin | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070275652 | Berkompas | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080098672 | O'Hagin et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080220714 | Caruso et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080299892 | Robinson | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090203308 | Daniels | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090286463 | Daniels | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100229940 | Basol | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20120073216 | Daniels | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120110924 | Makin | May 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
28 04 301 | Aug 1979 | DE |
31 32 152 | Jun 1982 | DE |
198 23 356 | Nov 1999 | DE |
2 324 823 | Apr 1977 | FR |
805978 | Dec 1958 | GB |
2 183 819 | Jun 1987 | GB |
2 211 287 | Jun 1989 | GB |
2 279 453 | Jan 1995 | GB |
2 345 536 | Jul 2000 | GB |
59-60138 | Apr 1984 | JP |
06-241517 | Aug 1994 | JP |
06-272920 | Sep 1994 | JP |
09-158428 | Jun 1997 | JP |
10-061133 | Mar 1998 | JP |
11-044035 | Feb 1999 | JP |
11-229576 | Aug 1999 | JP |
2000-274032 | Oct 2000 | JP |
2004-092298 | Mar 2004 | JP |
2007-534924 | Nov 2007 | JP |
WO 0140568 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO 2005-108708 | Nov 2005 | WO |
WO 2011126773 | Oct 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Advisory Action dated Nov. 14, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/736,498, filed Apr. 17, 2007. |
“Building Materials Listing Program,” Office of the State Fire Marshal—Fire Engineering—BML Program, http://osfm.fire.ca.gov/bml.html, Printed Feb. 27, 2008, 2 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Jul. 25, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/736,498, filed Apr. 17, 2007. |
“Grill Screens,” foodservicedirect.com, http://www.foodservicedirect.com/index.cfm/S/107/CLID/3362/N/9304/Grill—Screens.html, Printed Feb. 29, 2008, 1 page. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued Jun. 24, 2009, PCT Appl. No. PCT/US09/43838 filed May 13, 2009, 13 pages. |
International Search Report dated Nov. 25, 2005 in corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2005/029918. |
Office Action dated Dec. 26, 2008 in corresponding Malaysian Application No. PI 20054111. |
Office Action dated Dec. 18, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/736,498, filed Apr. 17, 2007. |
Office Action dated Dec. 23, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/736,498, filed Apr. 17, 2007. |
Office Action dated Jul. 21, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/923,456, filed Oct. 24, 2007. |
“Roof Battens,” NASH—National Association of Steel-Framed Housing, http://www.nash.asn.au/whyChooseStStartOwnBuildRoofBatten.php, Printed Mar. 5, 2008, 2 pages. |
“Stainless Steel Scrubber—Silver Color,” foodservicedirect.com, http://www.foodservicedirect.com/index.cfm/S/107/CLID/3362/N/102336/Stainless—Steel . . . , Printed Feb. 29, 2008, 1 page. |
“Synthetic Roof Underlayment,” ToolBase Services, http://www.toolbase.org/Technology-Inventory/Roofs/synthetic-roof-underlayment, Printed Mar. 5, 2008, 3 pages. |
“Tile Batten,” http://www.metrollqld.com.au/minisites/products/tilebatten.html, Apr. 12, 2001, 2 pages. |
“Wildland Urban Interface (WUI) Products,” California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection—Office of the State Fire Marshall, Published by CAL-FIRE Wildland Fire Prevention Engineering, http://osfm.fire.ca.gov/pdf/fireengineering/bml/wuiproducts.pdf, Revised Dec. 28, 2007, 11 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 5, 2012 in Application No. PCT/US2011/030027, filed Mar. 25, 2011. |
Office Action mailed Jan. 22, 2013 in Japanese Application No. 2011-509667, filed May 13, 2009. |
Office Action in Russian Application No. 2010149942/12, filed May 13, 2009, dated Mar. 21, 2013. |
Office Action in Russian Application No. 2010149942/12, filed May 13, 2009, dated Oct. 11, 2013. |
Office Action in Australian Application No. 2009246322, filed May 13, 2009, dated Nov. 28, 2013. |
Office Action mailed Nov. 26, 2013 in Japanese Application No. 2011-509667, filed May 13, 2009. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120073216 A1 | Mar 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61386886 | Sep 2010 | US |