The present invention relates generally to an abrasive article and, more particularly, to a porous abrasive article that allows air and dust particles to pass through.
Abrasive articles are used in industry for abrading, grinding, and polishing applications. They can be obtained in a variety of converted forms, such as belts, discs, sheets, and the like, in many different sizes.
Generally, when using abrasives articles in the form of “sheet goods” (i.e., discs and sheets), a back-up pad is used to mount or attach the abrasive article to the abrading tool. One method of attaching abrasive discs and sheets to back-up pads includes a two-part mechanical engagement system, such as, for example, a hook and loop fastener. When the attachment means is a hook and loop system, the abrasive article will have either a loop or the hook component on the backing surface opposite the abrasive coating, and the back-up pad will have the complementary mating component (i.e., a hook or loop).
One type of back-up pad has dust collection holes connected by a series of grooves to help control swarf build-up on the abrading surface of the abrasive article. The dust collection holes are typically connected to a vacuum source. The dust collection grooves and holes provide a passageway for removing particles such as swarf, dust, and debris from the abrading surface. The passageway can also be used to remove abrading fluids, such as water or oil, from the abrading surface.
In some configurations, particles and fluid pass from the abrading surface of the abrasive article to the back-up pad through holes cut in the abrasive article. The dust extraction capabilities of these designs are limited because of the intermittent presence of the holes. In other configurations, the abrasive article is made from a porous knitted cloth with integral loops, such as reported by Hoglund et al. in U.S. Pat. No. 6,024,634.
There is a continuing need for alternative ways to provide a cost effective abrasive article with a mechanical fastening system and dust extraction capabilities. It would be particularly desirable to provide a porous abrasive article in which the abrasive layer could be designed and manufactured independently of the attachment means.
The present invention relates generally to an abrasive article and, more particularly, to a porous abrasive article that allows air and dust particles to pass through.
In one aspect, the present invention provides an abrasive article with a screen abrasive comprising an open mesh backing having a first major surface that has a perimeter that defines a screen abrasive surface area, a second major surface, a plurality of openings extending from the first major surface to the second major surface, and an abrasive layer secured to at least a portion of the first major surface of the backing. The abrasive layer comprises a plurality of abrasive particles and at least one binder. A polymer netting is associated with the second major surface of the open mesh backing. The polymer netting a comprises a first plurality of strands extending in a first direction and a second plurality of strands extending in a second direction. The first and second plurality of strands are affixed to one another to form a plurality of openings in the polymer netting. The openings in the polymer netting cooperate with the screen abrasive to allow the flow of particles through the abrasive article. A plurality of hooks project from at least a portion of said second plurality of strands. The hooks can be used to engage the abrasive article to a sanding device with corresponding material that allows the hooks to engage.
In some embodiments, the abrasive article allows particles having a size of at least 10 micrometers to pass through the abrasive article.
In another aspect, the present invention provides methods for making abrasive articles having a screen abrasive and a polymer netting that cooperates with the screen abrasive to allow the flow of particles through the abrasive article.
In another aspect, the present invention provides alternative ways to provide a cost effective abrasive article with a mechanical fastening system and dust extraction capabilities. The abrasive article is useful for abrading a variety of surfaces, including, for example, paint, primer, wood, plastic, fiberglass, and metal. In some embodiments, the abrasive layer can be designed and manufactured independently of the polymer netting, allowing the manufacturer to optimize the performance of the screen abrasive substantially independently of the selection of polymer netting, and vice versa.
The above summary of the present invention is not intended to describe each disclosed embodiment or every implementation of the present invention. The Figures and the detailed description that follow more particularly exemplify illustrative embodiments. The recitation of numerical ranges by endpoints includes all numbers subsumed with that range (e.g., 1 to 5 includes 1, 1.5, 2, 2.75, 3, 4, 4.80, and 5).
These figures, which are idealized, are not to scale and are intended to be merely illustrative of the present invention and non-limiting.
The polymer netting forms the hook portion of a two-part mechanical engagement system. Abrasive articles according to the present invention may be attached to a variety of surfaces having any suitable engaging structures, such as fibers, filaments (such as brushed nylon and brushed polyester), woven and nonwoven fabrics, knitted fabric, and stitch-bonded fabrics. Other applications are also contemplated, such as attachment to foam (particularly open-cell foam) or to a compatible set of engaging hooks. The polymer netting is typically used to affix the abrasive article of the present invention to a back-up pad. The back-up pad typically includes a generally planar major surface with loops to which the polymer netting of the abrasive article, such as a disc or sheet, may be attached
Although back-up pads may be hand held, back-up pads are more commonly used in conjunction with a powered abrading apparatus such as electric or pneumatic sanders. The polymer netting can be designed with hooks that permit the abrasive article to be removed from a back-up pad with a small amount of force. The hooks can also be designed to resist movement of the abrasive article relative to the loop faced back-up pad during use. The desired hook and loop dimensions will depend upon the shape and type of hooks provided and on the desired engagement characteristics of the abrasive article.
The open mesh backing can be made from any porous material, including, for example, perforated films or woven or knitted fabrics. In the embodiment shown in
The openings 224 in the open mesh backing 222 can be generally square shaped as shown in
The woven open mesh backing 322 comprises a plurality of generally parallel warp elements 338 that extend in a first direction and a plurality of generally parallel weft elements 336 that extend in a second direction. The weft elements 338 and warp elements 336 of the open mesh backing 322 form a plurality of openings 324. An optional lock layer 326 can be used to improve integrity of the open mesh backing or improve adhesion of the abrasive layer to the open mesh backing.
As shown in
The warp and weft elements may be combined in any manner known to those in the art, including, for example, weaving, stitch-bonding, or adhesive bonding. The warp and weft elements may be fibers, filaments, threads, yams or a combination thereof. The warp and weft elements may be made from a variety of materials known to those skilled in the art, including, for example, synthetic fibers, natural fibers, glass fibers, and metal. In some embodiments, the warp and weft elements comprise monofilaments of thermoplastic material or metal wire. In some embodiments, the woven open mesh backing comprises nylon, polyester, or polypropylene.
The openings 324 in the open mesh backing 322 can be uniformly sized and positioned as shown in
The open mesh backing, whether woven or perforated, may comprise openings having different open areas. The “open area” of an opening in the mesh backing refers to the area of the opening as measured over the thickness of the mesh backing (i.e., the area bounded by the perimeter of material forming the opening through which a three-dimensional object could pass). Open mesh backings useful in the present invention typically have an average open area of at least about 0.3 square millimeters per opening. In some embodiments, the open mesh backing has an average open area of at least about 0.5 square millimeters per opening. In yet further embodiments, the open mesh backing has an average open area of at least about 0.7 square millimeters per opening.
Typically, open mesh backings useful in the present invention have an average open area that is less than about 3.5 square millimeters per opening. In some embodiments, the open mesh backing has an average open area that is less than about 2.5 square millimeters per opening. In yet further embodiments, the open mesh backing has an average open area that is less than about 0.9 square millimeters per opening.
The open mesh backing, whether woven or perforated, comprises a total open area that affects the amount of air that can pass through the open mesh backing as well as the effective area and performance of the abrasive layer. The “total open area” of the mesh backing refers to the cumulative open areas of the openings as measured over a unit area of the mesh backing. Open mesh backings useful in the present invention have a total open area of at least about 0.5 square centimeters per square centimeter of backing (i.e., 50 percent open area). In some embodiments, the open mesh backing has a total open area of at least about 0.6 square centimeters per square centimeter of backing (i.e., 60 percent open area). In yet further embodiments, the open mesh backing has a total open area of at least about 0.75 square centimeters per square centimeter of backing (i.e., 75 percent open area).
Typically, open mesh backings useful in the present invention have a total open area that is less than about 0.95 square centimeters per square centimeter of backing (i.e., 95 percent open area). In some embodiments, the open mesh backing has a total open area that is less than about 0.9 square centimeters per square centimeter of backing (i.e., 90 percent open area). In yet further embodiments, the open mesh backing has a total open area that is less than about 0.82 square centimeters per square centimeter of backing (i.e., 82 percent open area).
As shown in
As shown in
A plurality of openings 718 is formed by the intersecting first strands 754 and second strands 750. As shown in
Other shapes and geometries of openings in the polymer netting can also be used, including, for example, squares, diamonds, and polygons. The openings can be of a uniform shape and size or vary in size or shape. In some embodiments, the vacuum port configuration of the back-up pad is considered when selecting the shape, size, and placement of the openings in the polymer netting.
The shape and size of the strands of the first and second plurality of strands can be varied. In some embodiments, the shape and size of each of the first and second plurality of strands is configured to provide adequate strength and support for the hooks. The shape and size of each of the first and second plurality of strands can also be configured to accommodate the manufacturing process, including, for example the cutting and stretch process reported in U.S. Publication 2004/0170801 (Seth et al.), incorporated herein by reference.
In some embodiments, the shape and size of the first plurality of strands is configured to provide adequate surface area for affixing the polymer netting to the screen abrasive. In some embodiment, the first plurality of strands is “T”-shaped or “I”-shaped, wherein the upper horizontal portion of the “T” or “I” forms a surface for affixing to the screen abrasive and the opposite end of the “T” or “I” connects with the second plurality of strands. The shape and size of the strands of the first plurality of strands can also be configured to accommodate varying stretch ratios as reported in U.S. Publication 2004/0170801 (Seth et al.).
Typically, openings of the polymer netting useful in the present invention have an average open area no greater than 0.6 square millimeters per opening of the polymer netting. In some embodiments, the average open area is no greater than 0.5 square millimeters per opening of the polymer netting. In yet further embodiments, the average open area is no greater than 0.4 square millimeters per opening of the polymer netting.
Typically, openings of the polymer netting useful in the present invention have an average open area of at least 0.1 square millimeters per opening of the polymer netting. In some embodiments, the average open area is at least 0.2 square millimeters per opening of the polymer netting. In yet further embodiments, the average open area is at least 0.3 square millimeters per opening of the polymer netting.
The polymer netting comprises a cumulative open area that affects the amount of air and particles that can pass through the polymer netting as well as the effective support area for the screen abrasive and, therefore, the performance of the abrasive layer. The “cumulative open area” of the polymer netting refers to the sum of the open areas of the openings as measured over the screen abrasive surface area. The term “screen abrasive surface area” refers to the total area formed by the perimeter of the screen abrasive without consideration of any open areas in the screen. For example, an abrasive article comprising a screen abrasive with a 10 centimeter outer diameter having a polymer netting with 1,600 openings, each having an open area of 0.4 square millimeters, would have a cumulative open area of about 0.8 square centimeters per square centimeter of screen abrasive (i.e., 80 percent cumulative open area).
Polymer nettings useful in the present invention typically have a cumulative open area in the range of 0.65 to 0.95 square centimeters per square centimeter of screen abrasive (i.e., 65 to 95 percent cumulative open area). In some embodiments, the polymer netting has a cumulative open area in the range of 0.7 to 0.9 square centimeters per square centimeter of screen abrasive (i.e., 70 to 90 percent cumulative open area). In yet further embodiments, the polymer netting has a cumulative open area of about 0.8 square centimeters per square centimeter of screen abrasive (i.e., 70 to 90 percent cumulative open area).
Porosity for the abrasive article of the present invention can be measured with a Gurley Densitometer Model 4410. The Gurley Densitometer measures the amount of time, in seconds, required for 300 cubic centimeters of air to pass through a 0.65 square centimeter area of the abrasive article using a 1.39 Joules per meter force. The Gurley apparatus and procedures for its use are known in the textile industry. For purposes of the present invention, an abrasive article shall be considered “porous” if it has a Gurley porosity that is less than 5 seconds per 300 cubic centimeters of air for at least one 0.65 square centimeter area of the abrasive article.
In some embodiments, the abrasive article of the present invention has a Gurley porosity that is no greater than 5 seconds per 300 cubic centimeters of air. In other embodiments, the abrasive article of the present invention has a Gurley porosity that is no greater than 1.5 seconds per 300 cubic centimeters of air. In yet further embodiments, the abrasive article has a Gurley porosity that is no greater than 1 second per 300 cubic centimeters of air.
The polymer netting 716 comprises a plurality of hooks 752 projecting from the second plurality of strands 750. As used herein, the term “hook” refers to a structure that enables the polymer netting to releasably engage structures provided on an opposed surface. Hooks typically comprise a stem with a distal end that extends from the base sheet and a head proximate the distal end of the stem. The design of the hook may be selected from among numerous different designs known to those skilled in the art, including, for example, those reported in U.S. Pat. No. 6,579,161 (Chesley et al.), U.S. Pat. No. 6,843,944 (Bay et al.), and U.S. Publication 2004/0170801 (Seth et al.), which are incorporated herein by reference. It is understood that other hook designs are comprehended by the present invention, though they are not specifically described below.
The shapes, diameters, and lengths of the plurality of hooks can be mixed within a given abrasive article, such that the abrasive article comprises hooks of more than one shape, diameter, and/or length. The shape, size, and orientation of the hooks may be selected to provide suitable shear strength and peel strength for a given application.
The hooks may be straight, arcuate, or otherwise, and may be arranged in a regular array across the polymer netting. The density of hooks can be selected as desired. In some embodiments, the density of hooks is between approximately 8 and 310 hooks per square centimeter, although other hook densities can be provided.
When the abrasive article is attached to an opposed surface, such as a surface having a plurality of loop members, not all of the hooks must engage with the structures (such as a loop) of the opposed surface. Typically, a majority of the hooks will hook the structures of the engaging surface, and the disengagement force will typically be directly related to the number of hooks that are engaged. The percentage of hooks that are engaged by a particular opposed surface depends on many factors, such as hook dimensions and density, and the topography of the opposed surface.
The polymer netting material can be an organic polymeric material, such as a thermoplastic material. Useful materials include, but are not limited to, polyurethanes, polyamides, polyolefins (for example, polyethylene and polypropylene), polyesters, and combinations thereof. The hooks may also comprise one or more additives, including but not limited to fillers, fibers, antistatic agents, lubricants, wetting agents, surfactants, pigments, dyes, coupling agents, plasticizers, and suspending agents.
The screen abrasive 412 may be adhered to the polymer netting 416 using any suitable form of attachment, such as, for example, glue, pressure sensitive adhesive, hot-melt adhesive, spray adhesive, thermal bonding, and ultrasonic bonding.
The screen abrasive is affixed to the polymer netting in a manner that does not prevent the flow of particles through the abrasive article. In some embodiments, the screen abrasive is adhered to the polymer netting in a manner that does not substantially inhibit the flow of particles through the abrasive article. The level of particle flow through the abrasive article can be restricted, at least in part, by the introduction of an adhesive between the screen abrasive and the polymer netting. The level of restriction can be minimized by applying the adhesive to the screen abrasive in a discontinuous fashion such as, for example, as discrete adhesive areas (e.g., atomized spray or starved extrusion die) or distinct adhesive lines (e.g., hot melt swirl-spray or patterned roll coater).
In some embodiments, the particles of swarf, dust, or debris that can flow through the abrasive article of the present invention have a particle size of at least 10 micrometers. In some embodiments, at least 30 micrometer particles can pass through the abrasive article. In yet further embodiments, at least 45 micrometer particles can pass through the abrasive article.
In some embodiments, the screen abrasive is adhered to the polymer netting by applying a spray adhesive, such as, for example, “3M BRAND SUPER 77 ADHESIVE”, available from 3M Company, St. Paul, Minn., to one side of the screen abrasive. In other embodiments, a hot-melt adhesive is applied to one side of the screen abrasive using either a hot-melt spray gun or an extruder with a comb-type shim. In yet further embodiments, a preformed adhesive porous mesh is placed between the screen abrasive and the polymer netting.
Adhesives useful in the present invention include both pressure sensitive and non-pressure sensitive adhesives. Pressure sensitive adhesives are normally tacky at room temperature and can be adhered to a surface by application of, at most, light finger pressure, while non-pressure sensitive adhesives include solvent, heat, or radiation activated adhesive systems. Examples of adhesives useful in the present invention include those based on general compositions of polyacrylate; polyvinyl ether; diene-containing rubbers such as natural rubber, polyisoprene, and polyisobutylene; polychloroprene; butyl rubber; butadiene-acrylonitrile polymers; thermoplastic elastomers; block copolymers such as styrene-isoprene and styrene-isoprene-styrene block copolymers, ethylene-propylene-diene polymers, and styrene-butadiene polymers; polyalphaolefins; amorphous polyolefins; silicone; ethylene-containing copolymers such as ethylene vinyl acetate, ethylacrylate, and ethylmethacrylate; polyurethanes; polyamides; polyesters; epoxies; polyvinylpyrrolidone and vinylpyrrolidone copolymers; and mixtures of the above. Additionally, the adhesives can contain additives such as tackifiers, plasticizers, fillers, antioxidants, stabilizers, pigments, diffusing particles, curatives, and solvents.
As discussed above, the abrasive layer of the screen abrasive comprises a plurality of abrasive particles and at least one binder. In some embodiments, the abrasive layer comprises a make coat, a size coat, a supersize coat, or a combination thereof. In some embodiments, a treatment can be applied to the open mesh backing such as, for example, a presize, a backsize, a subsize, or a saturant.
Typically, the make layer of a coated abrasive is prepared by coating at least a portion of the open mesh backing (treated or untreated) with a make layer precursor. Abrasive particles are then at least partially embedded (e.g., by electrostatic coating) to the make layer precursor comprising a first binder precursor, and the make layer precursor is at least partially cured. Electrostatic coating of the abrasive particles typically provides erectly oriented abrasive particles. In the context of the present invention, the term “erectly oriented” refers to a characteristic in which the longer dimensions of a majority of the abrasive particles are oriented substantially perpendicular (i.e., between 60 and 120 degrees) to the backing. Other techniques for erectly orienting abrasive particles can also be used.
Next, the size layer is prepared by coating at least a portion of the make layer and abrasive particles with a size layer precursor comprising a second binder precursor (which may be the same as, or different from, the first binder precursor), and at least partially curing the size layer precursor. In some coated abrasive articles, a supersize is applied to at least a portion of the size layer. If present, the supersize layer typically includes grinding aids and/or anti-loading materials.
Typically, a binder is formed by curing (e.g., by thermal means, or by using electromagnetic or particulate radiation) a binder precursor. Useful first and second binder precursors are known in the abrasive art and include, for example, free-radically polymerizable monomer and/or oligomer, epoxy resins, acrylic resins, urethane resings, phenolic resins, urea-formaldehyde resins, melamine-formaldehyde resins, aminoplast resins, cyanate resins, or combinations thereof. Useful binder precursors include thermally curable resins and radiation curable resins, which may be cured, for example, thermally and/or by exposure to radiation.
Suitable abrasive particles for the screen abrasive that can be used in the abrasive article of the present invention can be any known abrasive particles or materials commonly used in abrasive articles. Examples of useful abrasive particles for coated abrasives include, for example, fused aluminum oxide, heat treated aluminum oxide, white fused aluminum oxide, black silicon carbide, green silicon carbide, titanium diboride, boron carbide, tungsten carbide, titanium carbide, diamond, cubic boron nitride, garnet, fused alumina zirconia, sol gel abrasive particles, silica, iron oxide, chromia, ceria, zirconia, titania, silicates, metal carbonates (such as calcium carbonate (e.g., chalk, calcite, marl, travertine, marble and limestone), calcium magnesium carbonate, sodium carbonate, magnesium carbonate), silica (e.g., quartz, glass beads, glass bubbles and glass fibers) silicates (e.g., talc, clays, (montmorillonite) feldspar, mica, calcium silicate, calcium metasilicate, sodium aluminosilicate, sodium silicate) metal sulfates (e.g., calcium sulfate, barium sulfate, sodium sulfate, aluminum sodium sulfate, aluminum sulfate), gypsum, aluminum trihydrate, graphite, metal oxides (e.g., tin oxide, calcium oxide), aluminum oxide, titanium dioxide) and metal sulfites (e.g., calcium sulfite), metal particles (e.g., tin, lead, copper), plastic abrasive particles formed from a thermoplastic material (e.g., polycarbonate, polyetherimide, polyester, polyethylene, polysulfone, polystyrene, acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene block copolymer, polypropylene, acetal polymers, polyvinyl chloride, polyurethanes, nylon), plastic abrasive particles formed from crosslinked polymers (e.g., phenolic resins, aminoplast resins, urethane resins, epoxy resins, melamine-formaldehyde, acrylate resins, acrylated isocyanurate resins, urea-formaldehyde resins, isocyanurate resins, acrylated urethane resins, acrylated epoxy resins), and combinations thereof. The abrasive particles may also be agglomerates or composites that include additional components, such as, for example, a binder. Criteria used in selecting abrasive particles used for a particular abrading application typically include: abrading life, rate of cut, substrate surface finish, grinding efficiency, and product cost.
Coated screen abrasives can further comprise optional additives, such as, abrasive particle surface modification additives, coupling agents, plasticizers, fillers, expanding agents, fibers, antistatic agents, initiators, suspending agents, photosensitizers, lubricants, wetting agents, surfactants, pigments, dyes, UV stabilizers, and suspending agents. The amounts of these materials are selected to provide the properties desired. Additives may also be incorporated into the binder, applied as a separate coating, held within the pores of the agglomerate, or combinations of the above.
Coated screen abrasive articles may be converted, for example, into belts, rolls, discs (including perforated discs), and/or sheets. One form of a coated screen abrasive useful in finishing operations is a disc. Abrasive discs are often used for the maintenance and repair of automotive bodies and wood finishing. The discs can be configured for use with a variety of tools, including, for example, electric or air grinders. The tool used to support the disc can have a self-contained vacuum system or can be connected to a vacuum line to help contain dust.
Advantages and other embodiments of this invention are further illustrated by the following examples, but the particular materials and amounts thereof recited in these examples, as well as other conditions and details, should not be construed to unduly limit this invention. For example, the basis weight, thickness, and composition of the polymer netting can vary. All parts and percentages are by weight unless otherwise indicated.
Unless otherwise noted, all parts, percentages, and ratios reported in the following examples are on a weight basis, and all reagents used in the examples were obtained, or are available, from general chemical suppliers such as the Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Company, Saint Louis, Mo., or may be synthesized by conventional techniques.
Sanding Test #1.
Using a razor blade, interconnecting U-shaped channels, 0.95 centimeter wide by 0.64 centimeter deep, were carved between the five holes of a 12.7 centimeter diameter by 1.6 centimeter thick foam back up pad, available under the trade designation “3M HOOKIT II BACKUP PAD, PART NUMBER 05345” from 3M Company, St. Paul, Minn. A 12.7 centimeter sample disc was attached to the back up pad and then the pad mounted onto a fine finishing dual-action orbital sander, model “21034” from Dynabrade Corporation, Clarence, N.Y. A central dust extraction vacuum line was then attached to the sander. The abrasive layer was manually brought into contact with a pre-weighed 38.1 centimeter by 53.3 centimeter acrylic test panel, obtained from Seelye Eiler Plastics Inc., Bloomington, Minn. The sander was run at 88.5 pounds per square inch (610.2 kilopascals) air line pressure and a down force of 12 pounds (5.4 kilograms) for 45 seconds. An angle of zero degrees to the surface of the workpiece was used. The 45 second abrading cycle is repeated another 4 times, for a total of 3 minutes and 45 seconds. After the final sanding cycle the test panel was re-weighed and the sanding procedure repeated two more times, from which the average cut was determined. A visual observation of swarf on the screen abrasive was also made at the completion of the sanding test.
Sanding Test #2
A 12.7 centimeter sample disc was attached to a 12.7 centimeter by 1.6 centimeter thick foam back up pad, available under the trade designation “3M HOOKIT II BACKUP PAD, PART NUMBER 05245” from 3M Company. The back up pad was then mounted onto the model 21034 sander and, with the central dust extraction vacuum line disconnected, the sanding protocol as described in sanding test #1 was replicated.
A screen abrasive was prepared as follows. A phenolic resin, available under the trade designation “BAKELITE PHENOLIC RESIN” from Bakelite Epoxy Polymer Corporation, Augusta, Ga., was dispersed to 56 percent solids in a 90:10 by weight water:polysolve medium, then diluted to 35 percent by weight solids with ethanol. The resin dispersion was applied as a make coat to a fiberglass plain weave scrim, available under the trade designation “1620-12” from Hexcel Reinforcements, Anderson, S.C. Grade P320 alumina abrasive mineral, obtained under the trade designation “FSX” from Triebacher Schleifmittel AG, Villach, Austria was electrostatically coated onto the resin, cured for 2 hours at 205 degrees Fahrenheit (96 degrees Celsius). A size coat of 35 percent by weight was then applied over the make coat and minerals, and the coating was cured for 16 hours at 212 degrees Fahrenheit (100 degrees Celsius). A 30 percent by weight aqueous dispersion of 85:15 by weight zinc stearate polyacrylate was applied over the size coat.
Attachment Backing 1 (AB 1)
The hook component of a releasable mechanical fastener system was made according to the method described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,843,944 (Bay et al.). The resultant polypropylene attachment backing had a 5 mils (127 micrometers) thickness, stem diameter 14 mils 355.6 micrometers), cap diameter 30 mils (0.76 millimeters), stem height 20 mils (508 micrometers) and a frequency of 340 stems per square inch (52.7 stems per square centimeter). The backing had zero open space.
Attachment Backing 2 (AB2)
A polypropylene mesh hook backing material was made according to the methods reported by U.S. Publication 2004/0170802 (Seth et al.), the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. The die geometry was similar to the die used to make the polymer netting shown in FIG. 10 of U.S. Publication 2004/0170802 (Seth et al.). However, in contrast to the article shown in FIG. 10 of U.S. Publication 2004/0170802 (Seth et al.), the hooks on the first plurality of strands were not cut and therefore, were reduced to approximately one-third there molded size after longitudinally stretching of the first strands at a stretch ratio of about 3. The uncut hooks of the first plurality of strands formed the surface for attaching the polymer netting to the screen abrasive. The second plurality of strands had a final thickness of approximately 9 mils (228.6 micrometers), and comprised a plurality of hooks having a stem height of 29 mils (736.6 micrometers), stem diameter 10 mils (254 micrometers) and stem frequency of approximately 450 stem per square inch (70 stems per square centimeter). The open space of the polymer netting accounted for 80 percent of the total surface area of the area formed by the perimeter of the polymer netting.
Comparative
An adhesive, type “3M 77 SPRAY ADHESIVE” from 3M Company, was lightly sprayed onto the non-abrasive side of the screen abrasive and to one side of AB 1, and the two materials laminated together. 12.7 centimeter discs were then die cut from the laminate sheet.
The non-abrasive side of screen abrasive was laminated to one side of AB2 according to the method described in Comparative A. Likewise, 12.7 centimeter sample discs were then die cut from the laminate.
Both the Comparative and the Example were subjected to Sanding Tests 1 and 2. Results are listed in Table 1 and Table 2, respectively.
It is to be understood that even in the numerous characteristics and advantages of the present invention set forth in above description and examples, together with details of the structure and function of the invention, the disclosure is illustrative only. Changes can be made to detail, especially in matters of the dimensions and compositions of the screen abrasive and polymer netting within the principles of the invention to the full extent indicated by the meaning of the terms in which the appended claims are expressed and the equivalents of those structures and methods.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1850413 | Porte | Mar 1932 | A |
1862103 | Stratford | Jun 1932 | A |
1961911 | Pusch | Jun 1934 | A |
2123581 | Anderson | Jul 1938 | A |
2740239 | Ball et al. | Apr 1956 | A |
2749681 | Reidenbach | Jun 1956 | A |
2838890 | McIntyre | Jun 1958 | A |
2984052 | Mueller, Jr. | May 1961 | A |
3021649 | Robbins | Feb 1962 | A |
3353308 | Zane | Nov 1967 | A |
3420007 | Kolesh | Jan 1969 | A |
3861892 | Wisdom, Jr. et al. | Jan 1975 | A |
3932966 | Stern | Jan 1976 | A |
4001366 | Brumlik | Jan 1977 | A |
4062152 | Mehrer | Dec 1977 | A |
4158935 | Robert | Jun 1979 | A |
4282011 | Terpay | Aug 1981 | A |
4287685 | Marton | Sep 1981 | A |
4437269 | Shaw | Mar 1984 | A |
4590113 | Herzog | May 1986 | A |
4609581 | Ott | Sep 1986 | A |
4631220 | Clifton | Dec 1986 | A |
4645699 | Neveu | Feb 1987 | A |
4722203 | Darjee | Feb 1988 | A |
4725487 | Pemrick et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4759155 | Shaw | Jul 1988 | A |
4844967 | Goralski et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4920702 | Kloss et al. | May 1990 | A |
4932163 | Chilton et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4937984 | Taranto | Jul 1990 | A |
4964243 | Reiter | Oct 1990 | A |
4964245 | Braasch | Oct 1990 | A |
5007206 | Paterson | Apr 1991 | A |
5036627 | Walters | Aug 1991 | A |
5131924 | Wiand | Jul 1992 | A |
5254194 | Ott et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5256231 | Gorman et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5317886 | Prahl | Jun 1994 | A |
5354591 | Ott et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5367839 | Pearce | Nov 1994 | A |
5389032 | Beardsley | Feb 1995 | A |
5458532 | Cannone | Oct 1995 | A |
5490878 | Peterson et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5505747 | Chesley et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5533923 | Shamouilian et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5578343 | Gaeta et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5607345 | Barry et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5616394 | Gorman et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5667540 | Chesley et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5674122 | Krech | Oct 1997 | A |
5695533 | Kardys et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5807161 | Manor et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5810650 | Jost | Sep 1998 | A |
5891549 | Beretta et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5904793 | Gorman et al. | May 1999 | A |
5954844 | Law et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5989112 | Long et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6024634 | Hoglund et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6059644 | Manor et al. | May 2000 | A |
6074292 | Gilday | Jun 2000 | A |
6077156 | Amin et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6077601 | DeVoe et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6190246 | Parrott et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6197076 | Braunschweig et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6280824 | Insley et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6312325 | Van Osenbruggen | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6368199 | Van Osenbruggen | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6482308 | Wiemann | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6575821 | Jöst | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6579162 | Chesley et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6613113 | Minick et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6790126 | Wood et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6923840 | Schutz et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
20030003856 | Swei | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030127108 | Policicchio et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030143938 | Braunschweig et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030159363 | Chesley et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040098923 | Hood et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040109978 | Michel | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040148866 | Krupnick | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040166788 | Travis | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040170801 | Seth et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040170802 | Seth et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040209561 | Suzuki et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050124274 | Hoglund | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060019579 | Braunschweig | Jan 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
34 16 186 | Jan 1985 | DE |
41 24 520 | Jan 1993 | DE |
201 11 245 U 1 | Aug 2001 | DE |
0 064 748 | Aug 1984 | EP |
0 166 060 | Sep 1988 | EP |
0 285 042 | Oct 1988 | EP |
0 578 865 | Jan 1994 | EP |
0 738 562 | Oct 1996 | EP |
1 488 888 | Dec 2004 | EP |
1 524 077 | Apr 2005 | EP |
1 733 844 | Dec 2006 | EP |
2 659 892 | Sep 1991 | FR |
2 739 308 | Apr 1997 | FR |
1137556 | Dec 1968 | GB |
1539477 | Jan 1970 | GB |
2 017 485 | Oct 1979 | GB |
2 057 483 | Apr 1981 | GB |
2 162 213 | Jan 1986 | GB |
2 199 053 | Jun 1988 | GB |
5-220670 | Aug 1993 | JP |
11-179668 | Jul 1999 | JP |
WO9014039 | Nov 1990 | WO |
WO9607509 | Mar 1996 | WO |
WO 0064634 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO 03020474 | Mar 2003 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070028525 A1 | Feb 2007 | US |