The present invention is related to knitted fabrics. More particularly, the present invention is related to an improved knit sueded fabric formed with novel knitting needles and sinkers.
Fabric softness, hand, drape, and appearance continue to influence consumer demand for apparel products. Fabric hairiness is one attribute of a fabric that has some correlation to softness, hand and appearance of the fabric. For example, a fabric with a higher hairiness value is generally associated with a perceived soft hand and supple fabric. Hairiness refers to the amount of fibers and/or fibers ends protruding from the surface of the fabric. While improved softness is associated with higher hairiness values, so are higher pilling rates, or pill counts. Thus, the designer is tasked to minimize these negative effects of increased hairiness.
Fiber, yarn and finishing process selection allows designers to influence the hairiness of fabrics and balance softness and pilling rates. Ring spun and open end yarns are two yarns, among others, that are used to manufacture knit fabrics for apparel. Structural differences between these yarns yield fabrics with different surface characteristics. For example, ring spun yarns typically have fiber ends emanating from the yarn. Open ends yarns, however, typically have fibers wrapped around a core bundle of fibers. Thus, fabrics manufactured with ring spun yarns, i.e., ring spun fabrics, can have higher hairiness values and are typically softer than fabrics manufactured with open end yarns. Consumers continue to desire ring spun fabric qualities in apparel such as T-shirts and underwear. Knit manufacturers, however, can realize increased cost savings and decreased manufacturing complexity using open end yarns.
Several finishing processes can be used to impart ring spun fabric qualities to knit fabrics produced from open-end or other types of yarns. One such process abrades a fabric to cut and raise the surface of the yarns. This process, known as sueding, yields a raised nap producing a soft, smooth surface texture resembling suede leather.
Sueding has several disadvantages such as the additional processing steps required, and the inefficiencies related to width utilization and increased fabric costs. Generation of lint, fly, and abrasive dust during processing raises environmental concerns for machine operators. Streaks in the fabric, reduction in strength, and shade changes during dying are other disadvantages associated with sueding.
Thus, there is a need for a knit fabric and a method of knitting fabrics having improved surface characteristics and softness, reduced pilling rates, lower costs and decreased manufacturing complexity.
Certain exemplary embodiments of the present invention are described below and illustrated in the accompanying Figures. The embodiments described are only for purposes of illustrating embodiments of the present invention and should not be interpreted as limiting the scope of the invention. Other embodiments of the invention, and certain modifications and improvements of the described embodiments, will occur to those of skill in the art, and all such alternate embodiments, modifications and improvements are within the scope of the present invention.
A knit fabric can be formed using a needle and a sinker having abrasive surfaces. A needle and sinker can abrade a yarn during knitting to yield a fabric with improved softness and hand.
Needle 10 has abrasive surfaces 20A and 20B capable of abrading a yarn during formation of a loop. Abrading, as used herein, refers to causing the fibers and/or fiber ends to protrude from a yarn, loop or fabric. As shown in
Turning to
The first end 61 of the sinker 60 receives and engages yarn 30 and loop 40 (not shown). Sinker 60 has a nib 66 extending above and over a knitting platform 68 to form a groove 67 or throat of the sinker 60, as is known in the art. The throat 67 receives the yarn 30 as shown in
In alternate embodiments, the sinker 60 may have a plurality of grooves. For example, a second nib and a second knitting platform may form a second groove. Each additional groove and knitting platform also may have abrasive surfaces. Multiple groove embodiments of sinker 60 may be used for plush or pile knit fabrics, as are known in the art. For example, plush, or pile fabrics may be formed with loop forming sinkers, or holding-down/loop forming sinkers, as is known in the art.
The second end 62 of the sinker 60 facilitates movement of the sinker 60. A control butt 69 on the second end 62 engages the sinker cam 158 (see
Abrasive surfaces 20 and 70 have a predetermined surface roughness capable of abrading a yarn and/or a loop. The predetermined surface roughness depends on, among other things, the desired hand feel of the resultant fabric, processing conditions during knitting, and the type of yarn used. Mechanical processes, chemical compositions, and/or the formation process used to manufacture the needle and sinker may be employed to form the abrasive surfaces 20 and 70. For example, needle 10 may be knurled, scuffing, filed, grooved or otherwise treated to a predetermined surface roughness. Also, the abrasive surfaces may be etched by a laser, or impacted by or during the stamping, cutting or shaping of the needle 10 and/or the sinker 60.
With respect to chemical compositions, a coating may be applied to the needle 10, yielding a predetermined surface roughness. In alternate embodiments, a coating may be used in combination with a silica and deposited on the needle 10. Further, processes such as chemical vapor deposition may be used to impart a predetermined surface roughness to needle 10 and/or sinker 60.
Abrasive surfaces 20 and 70 are sufficient to abrade the yarn 30 during knitting, without severing or excessively weakening the yarn. For example, abrasive surfaces 20 and 70 have a negligible impact on the fault rate of knitting. Fault rate, as used herein, refers to the number of yarn breaks, needle breaks, or missed stitches per linear yard of fabric. For example, an acceptable fault rate can be observed when open end yarns are used with the needle 10 and sinker 60.
The needle 10 and sinker 60 may be used on circular knitting machines, including open top, dial, cylinder, or cylinder-and-dial machines. Further, the needle 10 and sinker 60 may be used on straight bar machines or flat knitting machines. In alternate embodiments, abrasive surfaces may be use with warp knitting machines that uses latch needles.
The loop 40 clears latch 16 at the clearing height position 123. As needle 10 approaches the clearing height position 123, the abrasive surface 20 engages the yarn 30. While the sinker 60 is receiving the loop 40, the yarn feeder 159 introduces the yarn 30 (see
It is recognized that the abrasive surface 20 may delay opening of the latch 16 as the needle 10 approaches the clearing height position 123. The delayed opening can result in missed loops and an increased fault rate. Thus, the position of yarn feeder 159 may be adjusted closer to, or further away from, needle 10 as the need may arise. Further, yarn tension in the positive feed system may be adjusted to minimize missed loops resulting from delayed latch opening. In other alternate embodiments, a soluble needle oil may be used to improve the opening of latch 16.
The sinker 60 abrades the yarn 30 and loop 40 during the knitting cycle 120, as shown in
A knit fabric suitable for T-shirts, undergarments, socks, sweatshirts, tank tops, and brassieres, among others, may be manufactured using the needle 10 and sinker 60 described herein. The knit fabric may be a single jersey fabric, or in alternate embodiments, the knit fabric may be a double jersey, interlock, ribbed, jacquard single or jacquard double jersey, or other weft-knitted fabric. In other alternate embodiments, the knit fabric can be formed with a warp knitting process that uses latch needles.
The knit fabric may comprise natural or synthetic fibers. The fibers may be cotton, rayon, polyester, polypropylene, polyamide 6 or polyamide 6,6, wool, acrylic, elastane or other elastomeric fiber, or combinations thereof. In alternate embodiments, bi-component fibers may be used, such as sheath-core, side by side, tri-lobal tipped, or islands in the sea. In other alternate embodiments, the yarns 30 may be formed from blends of fibers. For example, an intimate blend of cotton and polyester may be used to form yarn 30.
A variety of other yarns also may be used to formed the knit fabric. For example, yarn 30 may be a staple yarn, continuous filament yarn, plied yarn, or combinations thereof. Further, yarn 30 may be open end, ring spun, air jet spun, rotor spun, or a core-spun yarn. For example, a core spun yarn with an elastic core can be used to form the knit fabric. In an embodiment, yarn 30 may have a cotton count (cc) between about 5/1 and about 75/1, more preferably between about 20/1 and 35/1.
Three exemplary fabrics were knitted according to the process described above using the improved needle and sinker and there resultant hairiness evaluated. Example A comprised a single jersey knitted fabric. An open-end yarn having a cotton count of 26/1 spun from cotton fibers was used. Needles and sinkers having abrasive surfaces 20 and 70, as described above, were used to manufacture Example A. A coating was used to form abrasive surfaces 20 and 70. Comparative examples were manufactured with an open end yarn (Example B) and a ring spun yarn (Example C), both using conventional needles and sinkers, i.e., without abrasive surfaces.
Examples A, B and C were tested for hairiness. Samples of each fabric were cut to 50-cm squares. Each sample was passed over an infrared light that counts the number, height and density of protruding fiber ends on the surface of a fabric. These values were then used to calculate a hairiness index. Each side of the sample was tested in the course direction, the wale direction, and each bias direction, i.e., the bias forms a line at about a 45° angle with the course direction and another line at about 45° angle with the wale direction of a fabric. Data from both sides of the fabric are shown in
The above descriptions of various embodiments of the invention are intended to describe and illustrate various elements and aspects of the invention. Persons of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that certain changes and modifications can be made to the described embodiments without departing from the scope of the invention. All such changes and modifications are intended to be within the scope of the appended claims.
This application is a continuation-in-part application of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/485,514, filed Jul. 12, 2006, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,634,922, which claims the benefit of U.S. Application Ser. No. 60/738,482, filed Nov. 21, 2005.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2188125 | Wigley | Jan 1940 | A |
2364649 | Palliser | Dec 1944 | A |
3940917 | Strachan | Mar 1976 | A |
5090218 | Schuler et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5205140 | Nielsen et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5205644 | Bayer et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5239844 | Sos | Aug 1993 | A |
5916273 | Hepfinger | Jun 1999 | A |
6242370 | Dischler | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6298692 | Kuroda et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60738482 | Nov 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11485514 | Jul 2006 | US |
Child | 12402088 | US |