This field of this invention relates to abrasive sheet material and more particularly to abrasive discs for power tools and a non-slip drive.
Abrasive materials have long been used for grinding and polishing. The abrasive material wears down the surface of the work by a cutting action. Rough surfaces, rough edges or tarnish or other weathered coating can be removed by the abrasive action.
It is also common to bind the abrasive material on a substrate or backing in order to have a handy easy to use abrasive tool. Often abrasive tools are desired over sandblasting or other spray or rubbing techniques of loose abrasive materials. One of the advantages is better cleanup and less dust or mess left over due to loose abrasive grit.
One common abrasive tool is often referred to as sandpaper which has sand or other grit element bonded onto a paper type backing. Sand paper is both used manually and in power tools such as orbital, random or belt tools. While sandpaper is a very popular media for abrading many materials especially wood, it has its problem of durability.
Durability can be curtailed if the edge of a sandpaper disc encounters a raised strip of wood in a wood deck. Wood decks are made from a plurality of individual strips or slats of wood which often can vary in height enough to allow the edge of one strip of wood to hit the side or lop of the sandpaper rather than the abrasive surface. When this happens, the wood may cut into or otherwise rip the sandpaper which then needs to be immediately replaced.
Furthermore, the aggressiveness of sandpaper may be limited by the extent of the slipping with the drive mechanism. The sandpaper often provides for greater friction between the abrasive surface and the work surface than the back of the sandpaper has with the drive mechanism. The sandpaper can then get stuck with the wood or other work surface and slips with respect to the drive mechanism.
What is needed is a sandpaper system with a non-slip drive mechanism and as canted outer periphery for increasing the efficiency and durability of the sandpaper.
In accordance with one aspect of the invention, an abrasive sandpaper system for a power tool includes a backing plate constructed to be mounted on a driver of a power tool with a positive interlocking device. A semi-rigid substrate that retains its shape when not flexed under load is removably mountable to the backing plate. The substrate has an abrasive surface being made from hard grit particles that are affixed onto said substrate. Preferably, the backing plate has at least one off-centered aperture for interlocking with complementarily shaped off-centered lugs on the driver. In one embodiment, the lug's height is no greater than the aperture's height in the backing plate. Preferably, the backing plate and the substrate have complementary hook and loop fasteners to non-slidably and removably fasten the substrate to the backing plate.
It is preferred that the backing plate and the substrate both have a periphery canted away from the abrasive surface.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention, an abrasive sandpaper pad for a power tool includes a backing plate with a central pocket for receiving a sandpaper layer. An outer periphery surrounds the pocket forming a side wall of the pocket. The outer periphery is also canted upwardly. The pocket has a sufficient depth to receive a fastener device for securing the sandpaper to the backing plate, a substrate layer of the sandpaper and to expose an abrasive layer of the sandpaper below said side wall. It is desired that the fastener device includes complementary hook and loop layers adhered to the pocket and to the substrate layer of the sandpaper.
Reference now is made to the accompanying drawings in which:
Referring now to
Referring now to
It is preferred that the lugs 18 are positioned in an asymmetrical position to prevent backing plates and/or sandpaper, without the appropriate positioned apertures 26, from being balanced thereon. If a backing plate without apertures 26 is mounted, the tightening of the bolt 42 causes the plate 16 to cant and be noticeably out of position. This allows a unique proprietary drive position for different brands.
The backing layer 32 of the sandpaper may be provided with an adhered Velcro or other hook and loop or other high friction fastener to fasten the sandpaper 30 to the backing plate 16. The backing plate 16 may be bonded or adhered to a complementary section of the hook and loop fastener. Thus any undesirable slippage of the sandpaper 30 with the backing plate 16 is minimized.
The connection between the backing plate 16 and the driver 12 is also minimized against slippage by the positive interconnection with the aperture 26 and lugs 18 of the driver.
Another embodiment is shown in
In this way, the beveled periphery 128 provides for the backing plate 116 to ride over any raised edges 45 and position the sandpaper such that only its exposed abrasive layer 56 hits the edge 45 laterally which enables the sandpaper to also ride over the edge 45. The sandpaper substrate layer 58 is protected by the periphery 128.
In this embodiment, the backing plate 116 has similar aperture 126 to receive lugs 18 of the driver. The lugs provide a positive drive between the driver and backing plate 116 and prevent any slipping in either the forward or reverse directions, i.e. clockwise or counterclockwise rotation by having the sides of the lugs 18 abut both sides of the apertures 26 simultaneously. The Velcro™ hook and loop connection provide a non-slip connection between the backing plate 116 and the sandpaper 54.
In this fashion, both the durability and the efficiency of the sandpaper is increased.
Other variations and modifications are possible without departing from the scope and spirit of the present invention as defined by the appended claims.
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. Ser. No. 10/453,310 filed on Jun. 3, 2003 now abandoned
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2201196 | Williamson | May 1940 | A |
2740239 | Ball et al. | Apr 1956 | A |
2778169 | Ball | Jan 1957 | A |
2876086 | Raymond | Mar 1959 | A |
3092937 | Tocci-Guilbert | Jun 1963 | A |
3315420 | Moberg | Apr 1967 | A |
3466877 | Foley et al. | Sep 1969 | A |
3491494 | Mackay, Jr. | Jan 1970 | A |
3860400 | Prowse et al. | Jan 1975 | A |
3869263 | Greenspan | Mar 1975 | A |
3918217 | Oliver | Nov 1975 | A |
3974598 | Guidry | Aug 1976 | A |
4010583 | Highberg | Mar 1977 | A |
4047902 | Wiand | Sep 1977 | A |
4114322 | Greenspan | Sep 1978 | A |
4282011 | Terpay | Aug 1981 | A |
4285171 | Block et al. | Aug 1981 | A |
4668248 | Dettelbach et al. | May 1987 | A |
4836832 | Tumey et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4916869 | Oliver | Apr 1990 | A |
4925457 | deKok et al. | May 1990 | A |
4964884 | Jurissen et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4974373 | Kawashima et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
5131924 | Wiand | Jul 1992 | A |
5203881 | Wiand | Apr 1993 | A |
5209760 | Wiand | May 1993 | A |
5232470 | Wiand | Aug 1993 | A |
5567503 | Sexton et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5947807 | Overseth | Sep 1999 | A |
6123612 | Goers | Sep 2000 | A |
6190246 | Parrott et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6227959 | Beaudry | May 2001 | B1 |
6312325 | Van Osenbruggen | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6361424 | Manor et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6368198 | Sung et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6394887 | Edinger | May 2002 | B1 |
6530830 | Rich et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
20040127151 | Takizawa et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050124270 A1 | Jun 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10453310 | Jun 2003 | US |
Child | 11042392 | US |