1. Technical Field
The present invention relates to an abrasive water-jet machining device.
2. Description of the Related Art
Abrasive water-jet machining devices disclosed in Japanese Unexamined Utility Model Application, Publication No. Hei 05-12100 (JP 05-12100) and U.S. Pat. No. 4,827,679, for example, have been known.
Conventional water jet cutting devices disclosed in JP 05-12100 etc. are configured such that a constant space (distance) is always kept between a nozzle 14 (referred to as “abrasive nozzle assembly 11” in this specification) and a catcher 22 (referred to as “catcher cup 12” in this specification), specifically, such that the distance therebetween is always kept constant irrespective of the plate thickness (thickness) of a workpiece W to be cut.
Thus, when the workpiece W whose plate thickness changes in a longitudinal direction (vertical direction) and/or a width direction (horizontal direction) is cut by using the conventional water jet cutting devices disclosed in JP 05-12100 etc., the distance between a lower surface of the workpiece W and the catcher 22 is increased at a portion where the plate thickness is small. Therefore, an abrasive fluid (referred to as “ultrahigh-pressure water” in this specification) flowing from the lower surface of the workpiece W toward the catcher 22 is scattered in a conical pattern, decreasing the collection rate of the abarasive fluid, and thus there is a possibility that the workpiece W will be damaged by the scattered abrasive material (referred to as “abrasive” in this specification).
Furthermore, if the inner diameter of the catcher 22 is increased in order to prevent the workpiece W from being damaged by the scattered abrasive material, the catcher 22 is increased in size, and thus there is a possibility that the catcher 22 will collide with the lower surface of the workpiece W, damaging the workpiece W.
The present invention has been made in view of the above-described circumstances, and an object thereof is to provide an abrasive water-jet machining device capable of increasing the collection rate of an abrasive fluid when cutting a workpiece whose plate thickness changes in the longitudinal direction (vertical direction) and/or the width direction (horizontal direction) and improving the worker's working environment.
In order to solve the above-described problem, the present invention employs the following solutions.
The present invention provides an abrasive water-jet machining device including: an abrasive nozzle assembly that jets ultrahigh-pressure water mixed with an abrasive during a cutting process for cutting a workpiece into a desired shape; a catcher cup that collects the ultrahigh-pressure water jetted from the abrasive nozzle assembly; and a distance adjusting mechanism that adjusts a distance between the abrasive nozzle assembly and the catcher cup so as to keep a constant distance between the catcher cup and the workpiece.
According to the abrasive water-jet machining device of the present invention, even if the thickness of the workpiece changes, it is possible to maintain a constant distance (the optimum distance) between the catcher cup and the workpiece according to the change in the thickness of the workpiece, thus facilitating the collection of the ultrahigh-pressure water containing the abrasive, and to produce a fine finish on the machined surface, thus eliminating the need for additional finishing work, thereby making it possible to improve the work efficiency.
Furthermore, because the ultrahigh-pressure water containing the abrasive is collected without being spilled, it is possible to increase the collection rate of the ultrahigh-pressure water, to prevent the workpiece from being damaged by the scattered abrasive, and to improve the worker's working environment.
Furthermore, because the catcher cup is located at a position closer to the workpiece (at the optimum position), it is possible to reduce the sound level produced during the cutting work, thus improving the worker's working environment. Specifically, with the conventional technique disclosed in JP 05-12100, for example, nearby workers need to wear earplugs or the like because the sound (noise) level produced during the cutting work is about 100 db; however, with the abrasive water-jet machining device of the present invention, it becomes unnecessary to wear earplugs or the like, and the sound level is improved to a level allowing workers to have a conversation.
Furthermore, because the catcher cup 12 is located at a position closer to the workpiece W (at the optimum position) to achieve a reduction in size (diameter) of the catcher cup 12, it is possible to improve the ability to avoid interference with the workpiece W, thus making it possible to access a narrower space, compared with conventional techniques, to perform the cutting work.
Furthermore, by achieving a reduction in size (diameter) of the catcher cup 12, which is made of an expensive abrasion-resistant material, a reduction in cost can be achieved.
In the above-described abrasive water-jet machining device, it is more preferable that the abrasive nozzle assembly be fixed to one end of the distance adjusting mechanism, the catcher cup be fixed to the other end of the distance adjusting mechanism, and the distance adjusting mechanism, the abrasive nozzle assembly, and the catcher cup be configured as one unit.
According to this abrasive water-jet machining device, the distance adjusting mechanism, the abrasive nozzle assembly, and the catcher cup can be moved, as one unit, with respect to the workpiece. Specifically, the need to separately move the distance adjusting mechanism, the abrasive nozzle assembly, and the catcher cup is eliminated.
Thus, it is possible to provide the most-simple mechanism (configuration) for moving the distance adjusting mechanism, the abrasive nozzle assembly, and the catcher cup and to reduce the costs of equipment and maintenance checks.
The present invention provides a machine tool including the above-described abrasive water-jet machining device.
According to the machine tool of the present invention, even if the thickness of the workpiece changes, it is possible to maintain a constant distance (the optimum distance) between the catcher cup and the workpiece according to the change in the thickness of the workpiece, thus facilitating the collection of the ultrahigh-pressure water containing the abrasive, and to produce a fine finish on the machined surface, thus eliminating the need for additional finishing work, thereby making it possible to improve the work efficiency.
Furthermore, because the ultrahigh-pressure water containing the abrasive is collected without being spilled, it is possible to increase the collection rate of the ultrahigh-pressure water, to prevent the workpiece from being damaged by the scattered abrasive, and to improve the worker's working environment.
Furthermore, because the catcher cup is located at a position closer to the workpiece (at the optimum position), it is possible to reduce the sound level produced during the cutting work, thus improving the worker's working environment. Specifically, with the conventional technique disclosed in JP 05-12100, for example, nearby workers need to wear earplugs or the like because the sound (noise) level produced during the cutting work is about 100 db; however, with the abrasive water-jet machining device of the present invention, it becomes unnecessary to wear earplugs or the like, and the sound level is improved to a level allowing workers to have a conversation.
Furthermore, because the catcher cup is located at a position closer to the workpiece (at the optimum position) to achieve a reduction in size (diameter) of the catcher cup, it is possible to improve the ability to avoid interference with the workpiece, thus making it possible to access a narrower space, compared with conventional techniques, to perform the cutting work.
Furthermore, by achieving a reduction in size (diameter) of the catcher cup, which is made of an expensive abrasion-resistant material, a reduction in cost can be achieved.
In the above-described machine tool, it is more preferable to further include a controller that stores a maximum machining speed corresponding to a material and a thickness of the workpiece, in the form of a database for each material and thickness of the workpiece, that compares data stored in the database with data about the material and the thickness of the workpiece to be cut, input before the cutting work, and that outputs a command signal for the machining speed so as to make the arm move at the maximum machining speed.
According to this machine tool, the maximum machining speed is selected by the controller, and the workpiece is cut at the maximum machining speed.
Thus, it is possible to cut the workpiece in the shortest amount of time, thus improving the work efficiency.
In the above-described machine tool, it is more preferable that the controller is configured to output a command signal to the arm so as to keep a constant distance between the abrasive nozzle assembly and the workpiece.
According to this machine tool, even if the thickness of the workpiece changes, it is possible to keep a constant distance (the optimum distance) between the abrasive nozzle assembly and the workpiece according to the change in the thickness of the workpiece, thus further facilitating the collection of the ultrahigh-pressure water containing the abrasive, and to produce a finer finish on the machined surface, thus making it possible to further improve the work efficiency.
Furthermore, because even more ultrahigh-pressure water containing the abrasive is collected without being spilled, it is possible to further increase the collection rate of the ultrahigh-pressure water and to further improve the worker's working environment.
According to the abrasive water-jet machining device of the present invention, an advantageous effect is afforded in that it is possible to increase the collection rate of an abrasive fluid when cutting a workpiece whose plate thickness changes in the longitudinal direction (vertical direction) and/or the width direction (horizontal direction) and to improve the worker's working environment.
An abrasive water-jet machining device according to one embodiment of the present invention will be described below with reference to
An abrasive water-jet machining device 10 of this embodiment is a device that is applied to a gantry type machine tool 1 shown in
As shown in
As shown in
Here, the (maximum) machining speed (tool feed speed: tool movement speed) v and the distance d between the outlet 11a of the abrasive nozzle assembly 11 and the inlet 12a of the catcher cup 12, specifically, Ln (the distance between the outlet 11a of the abrasive nozzle assembly 11 and the workpiece W)+t (the thickness of the workpiece W)+L (the distance between the workpiece W and the inlet 12a of the catcher cup 12) shown in
Note that, among the pieces of data stored in the controller in the form of the database, the machining speed v for the cutting work is calculated in advance for each material and thickness t of the workpiece W through a cutting experiment performed for calculating the machining speed v that satisfies a required (desired) roughness (accuracy) Ra.
Furthermore, in this cutting experiment, the scattering angle of ultrahigh-pressure water jetted from a lower surface of the workpiece W, indicated by reference symbol B in
Then, the minimum inner diameters (=2 D) of the catcher cup 12 required for the catcher cup 12, indicated by solid circles in
Specifically, when the maximum machining speed v for the cutting work is 3 mm/sec, a catcher cup 12 having an inner diameter of 3 mm or more is adopted (selected), and, if the maximum machining speed v for the cutting work is 7 mm/sec, a catcher cup 12 having an inner diameter of 7 mm or more is adopted (selected).
Furthermore, the distance Ln between the outlet 11a of the abrasive nozzle assembly 11 and the workpiece W is set to be as short as possible while taking into account the accuracy of position control of the abrasive nozzle assembly 11 performed by the Z-axis-direction moving mechanism 4, the shape of the abrasive nozzle assembly 11, and the shape of the workpiece W (for example, an L-shape shown in
On the other hand, the distance L between the workpiece W and the inlet 12a of the catcher cup 12 is set to be as short as possible while taking into account the accuracy of position control of the catcher cup 12 performed by the distance adjusting mechanism 13, the shape of the catcher cup 12, and the shape of the workpiece W.
Note that solid lines indicated by reference symbol T in
According to the abrasive water-jet machining device 10 of this embodiment, even if the thickness of the workpiece W changes, it is possible to keep a constant distance (the optimum distance) between the catcher cup 12 and the workpiece W according to the change in the thickness of the workpiece W, thus facilitating the collection of the ultrahigh-pressure water containing the abrasive, and to produce a fine finish on the machined surface, thus eliminating the need for additional finishing work, thereby making it possible to improve the work efficiency.
Furthermore, because the ultrahigh-pressure water containing the abrasive is collected without being spilled, it is possible to increase the collection rate of the ultrahigh-pressure water, to prevent the workpiece W from being damaged by the scattered abrasive, and to improve the worker's working environment.
Furthermore, because the catcher cup 12 is located at a position closer to the workpiece W (at the optimum position), it is possible to reduce the sound level produced during the cutting work, thus improving the worker's working environment. Specifically, with the conventional technique disclosed in JP 05-12100, for example, nearby workers need to wear earplugs or the like because the sound (noise) level produced during the cutting work is about 100 db; however, with the abrasive water-jet machining device 10 of this embodiment, it becomes unnecessary to wear earplugs or the like, and the sound level is improved to a level allowing workers to have a conversation.
Furthermore, because the catcher cup 12 is located at a position closer to the workpiece W (at the optimum position) to achieve a reduction in size (diameter) of the catcher cup 12, it is possible to improve the ability to avoid interference with the workpiece W, thus making it possible to access a narrower space, compared with conventional techniques, to perform the cutting work.
Furthermore, by achieving a reduction in size (diameter) of the catcher cup 12, which is made of an expensive abrasion-resistant material, a reduction in cost can be achieved.
Furthermore, the machine tool of this embodiment is equipped with the above-described abrasive water-jet machining device.
According to the gantry type machine tool 1 of this embodiment, even if the thickness of the workpiece W changes, it is possible to keep a constant distance (the optimum distance) between the catcher cup 12 and the workpiece W according to the change in the thickness of the workpiece W, thus facilitating the collection of the ultrahigh-pressure water containing the abrasive, and to produce a fine finish on the machined surface, thus eliminating the need for additional finishing work, thereby making it possible to improve the work efficiency.
Furthermore, because the ultrahigh-pressure water containing the abrasive is collected without being spilled, it is possible to increase the collection rate of the ultrahigh-pressure water, to prevent the workpiece W from being damaged by the scattered abrasive, and to improve the worker's working environment.
Furthermore, because the catcher cup 12 is located at a position closer to the workpiece W (at the optimum position), it is possible to reduce the sound level produced during the cutting work, thus improving the worker's working environment. Specifically, with the conventional technique disclosed in JP 05-12100, for example, nearby workers need to wear earplugs or the like because the sound (noise) level produced during the cutting work is about 100 db; however, with the gantry type machine tool 1 of this embodiment, it becomes unnecessary to wear earplugs or the like, and the sound level is improved to a level allowing workers to have a conversation.
Furthermore, because the catcher cup 12 is located at a position closer to the workpiece W (at the optimum position) to achieve a reduction in size (diameter) of the catcher cup 12, it is possible to improve the ability to avoid interference with the workpiece W, thus making it possible to access a narrower space, compared with conventional techniques, to perform the cutting work.
Furthermore, by achieving a reduction in size (diameter) of the catcher cup 12, which is made of an expensive abrasion-resistant material, a reduction in cost can be achieved.
Furthermore, the gantry type machine tool 1 of this embodiment includes the controller (not shown), which stores the maximum machining speed corresponding to the material and the thickness of the workpiece W in the form of the database for each material and thickness of the workpiece W, which compares the data stored in the database with data about the material and the thickness of the workpiece W to be cut, input before the cutting work, and which outputs a command signal for the machining speed for making the arm 2 move at the maximum machining speed. Specifically, in the gantry type machine tool 1 of this embodiment, the maximum machining speed is selected by the controller, and the workpiece W is cut at the maximum machining speed.
Thus, it is possible to cut the workpiece W in the shortest amount of time, thus improving the work efficiency.
Furthermore, the gantry type machine tool 1 of this embodiment is configured to output a command signal from the controller to the arm 2 so as to maintain a constant distance between the abrasive nozzle assembly 11 and the workpiece W. Specifically, in the gantry type machine tool 1 of this embodiment, even if the thickness of the workpiece W changes, a constant distance (the optimum distance) is kept between the abrasive nozzle assembly 11 and the workpiece W according to the change in the thickness of the workpiece W.
Thus, it is possible to further facilitate the collection of the ultrahigh-pressure water containing the abrasive and to produce a finer finish on the machined surface, thus making it possible to further improve the work efficiency.
Furthermore, because even more ultrahigh-pressure water containing the abrasive is collected without being spilled, it is possible to further increase the collection rate of the ultrahigh-pressure water and to further improve the worker's working environment.
Note that the present invention is not limited to the above-described embodiment, and various changes and modifications can be made without departing from the scope of the present invention.
For example, in the above-described embodiment, although a description has been given of a specific example in which the abrasive water-jet machining device 10 of the present invention is applied to the gantry type machine tool 1, the abrasive water-jet machining device 10 of the present invention can be applied to any machine tool other than the gantry type machine tool 1 or to a machine tool such as a six-axis robot (vertical articulated robot).
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2011-089300 | Apr 2011 | JP | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/JP2012/059711 | 4/9/2012 | WO | 00 | 10/8/2013 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2012/141143 | 10/18/2012 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2985050 | Schwacha | May 1961 | A |
4435902 | Mercer et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
4669229 | Ehlbeck | Jun 1987 | A |
4799415 | Gerdes | Jan 1989 | A |
4827679 | Earle, III | May 1989 | A |
4864780 | Ehlbeck et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4872293 | Yasukawa et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4920841 | Johnson | May 1990 | A |
4937985 | Boers et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4964244 | Ehlbeck | Oct 1990 | A |
5111652 | Andre | May 1992 | A |
5527204 | Rhoades | Jun 1996 | A |
6244927 | Zeng | Jun 2001 | B1 |
7052378 | Tateiwa et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7059940 | Seo et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
8894468 | Hashish et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
20070221023 | Yoshida et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20090098810 | Mase | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20100122719 | Mase et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20110020155 | Reukers | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20120184185 | Kanazawa et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
87100891 | Sep 1987 | CN |
0 520 907 | Dec 1992 | EP |
0 985 491 | Mar 2000 | EP |
1 522 391 | Apr 2005 | EP |
1-103265 | Apr 1989 | JP |
4-146080 | May 1992 | JP |
5-12100 | Feb 1993 | JP |
7-8158 | Mar 1995 | JP |
2000-88559 | Mar 2000 | JP |
2000-176840 | Jun 2000 | JP |
2001-198830 | Jul 2001 | JP |
2003-25021 | Jan 2003 | JP |
2003-220428 | Aug 2003 | JP |
2006-110697 | Apr 2006 | JP |
2006-167461 | Jun 2006 | JP |
2010-120134 | Jun 2010 | JP |
10-2009-111645 | Oct 2009 | KR |
Entry |
---|
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority issued May 1, 2012 in International Application No. PCT/JP2012/059711. |
International Search Report issued May 1, 2012 in International Application No. PCT/JP2012/059711. |
Office Action issued Jul. 18, 2014 in corresponding Korean patent application No. 2013-7026744 (with English translation). |
Extended European Search Report issued Mar. 2, 2015 in corresponding European patent application No. 12771418.6. |
Office Action issued Mar. 26, 2015 in corresponding Chinese patent application No. 201280015428.2 (with English translation). |
Decision to Grant a Patent issued May 19, 2015 in corresponding Japanese patent application No. 2011-089300. |
Decision to Grant a Patent issued May 29, 2015 in corresponding Korean patent application No. 2013-7026744. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140030963 A1 | Jan 2014 | US |