Absorbent article having an improved fastening system

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6296629
  • Patent Number
    6,296,629
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, June 2, 1999
    25 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 2, 2001
    22 years ago
Abstract
An absorbent or other article including a tensioning system for joining portions of the article together. The system includes a plurality of hook members attached on one portion of the article, and a plurality of loop members attached to a loop panel wherein the loop panel may be intermittently attached to the article.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




The present invention pertains to diapers, incontinence garments, and the like, and more specifically to a disposable diaper, disposable incontinence garment, and the like in which attachment is accomplished with an improved mechanical fastening system.




Diapers or incontinence garments generally comprise a liquid-impermeable barrier sheet, a liquid-permeable bodyside liner, and an absorbent medium therebetween. They may generally include some type of attaching system for fitting the diaper or garment to the wearer. The present invention is intended for use with these types of articles, and also with other types of articles that require some type of attaching feature, such articles being surgical gowns, and other personal care or health care garments.




Mechanical attachments, such as hook-and-loop systems, have been used on garments in the past. However, various limitations have prevented the widespread commercialization of these systems on disposable garments or other disposable articles. The most apparent limitations to the commercialization include the cost of the system and the functionality of that system. Typically, the cost and functionality of the system is a tradeoff. In other words, greater functionality and performance can be achieved by using more expensive materials.




Generally, hook-and-loop systems fail in the “peel” mode. For example, a peel mode exists when one component is held stationary, while the second component is pulled off the first component sequentially. When two attaching components, such as a plurality of hooks and a plurality of loops, are disengaged in the peel mode, the hooks and loops are progressively separated. That is, each row or line of hooks is disengaged a little at a time until all of the hooks are disengaged from their respective loops. The peel performance of hook-and-loop systems is very sensitive to the cost/performance ratio. Generally, to obtain higher peel, a higher basis weight loop must be used which ultimately translates to more loops, thicker fabric, and greater overall cost.




A “shear” mode failure, in comparison, exists when the two components are being pulled apart by oppositely directed forces lying in the same plane. The shear mode action is a sliding, linear action, in contrast to the peel mode which is a curvilinear type of motion or action.




A “latching” mode failure exists when the two components are being pulled apart by oppositely directed forces acting generally perpendicular to the plane of the components.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




The present invention provides various features and techniques to improve the performance of hook-and-loop systems.




In one embodiment of the present invention there is provided an absorbent article comprising a composite including a substrate, an absorbent, and front and back end portions. A first releasably engageable member is on the back end portion, and a second releasably engageable member is with the front end portion. A buckling mechanism joins the second releasably engageable member to the front end portion.




In another embodiment of the present invention the back end portion has an attaching member, and a foldable trapping panel is on the front end portion. The trapping panel comprises a base panel and a flap panel, and the attaching member is releasably engageable between them.




In yet another embodiment of the present invention a tensioning mechanism applies tension to the first and second releasably engageable members.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




The above-mentioned and other features and objects of this invention, and the manner of attaining them, will become more apparent and the invention itself will be better understood by reference to the following description of the embodiments of the invention taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:





FIG. 1

is a perspective view of the back of a diaper incorporating some principles of the present invention;





FIG. 2

is a perspective front view of the diaper in

FIG. 1

partially broken away;





FIG. 3

is a cross-sectional view of

FIG. 2

taken along line


3





3


and viewed in the direction of the arrows;





FIG. 4

is a cross-sectional view of

FIG. 2

taken along line


4





4


and viewed in the direction of the arrows;





FIG. 5

is a schematic of an apparatus for applying adhesive beads in a spaced-apart fashion upon a material sheet;





FIG. 6

is a plan view of the applied adhesive beads on the material sheet;





FIG. 7

is a graph comparing the closure force of a conventional hook-and-loop system and a hook-and-loop system of the present invention;





FIG. 8

is an enlarged side elevational view illustrating the attachment of a loop material on a substrate in accordance with the present invention;





FIG. 9

is an enlarged side elevational view of the loop material in

FIG. 8

in a buckled, tensioned state;





FIG. 10

is a perspective view of the back of a diaper incorporating other principles of the present invention;





FIG. 11

is an enlarged side elevational view illustrating the closed position of the attaching system illustrated in

FIG. 10

; and





FIG. 12

is a graph comparing the closure force of a hook-and-loop system without a trap feature and a hook-and-loop system incorporating a trap feature of the present invention.





FIG. 13A

is an enlarged side elevational view illustrating a hook-and-loop system in a conventional untensioned state;





FIG. 13B

is an enlarged side elevational view illustrating a hook-and-loop system of the present invention in a tensioned state;





FIG. 14

is a graph illustrating increases in latching forces as tension is increased on the system;





FIG. 15

is a graph comparing improved mechanical fastening for different hook types under varying tensions; and





FIG. 16

is an illustration of equipment used with the described latching test procedure.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION




Although it is contemplated that the present invention is operable in a baby diaper, child's training pant, adult incontinence products, and other personal or health care products, the present description will be made in terms of a baby diaper for ease of explanation and illustration.




Referring to

FIGS. 1-4

, diaper


2


generally comprises backsheet


4


, topsheet


6


, and absorbent medium


8


therebetween. Leg elastics


10


are joined to side margins


12


of diaper


2


in order to gather or shirr at least intermediate portion


14


of diaper


2


. Diaper


2


further comprises a front waist portion


16


, rear waist portion


17


, and ear portions


18


that are generally integral with rear waist portion


17


. As can be seen in

FIGS. 1 and 2

, intermediate portion


14


has a more narrow width that front and rear waist portions


16


,


17


, thereby giving diaper


2


a generally hour-glass shape. In

FIG. 1

, the arrow designated L represents the length dimension of diaper


2


and the machine direction in the manufacture of diaper


2


, and the arrow perpendicular thereto designated as T indicates the width of diaper


2


, as well the cross direction of the diaper during the manufacturing process.




Front waist portion


16


includes ear sections


20


which have disposed therebetween loop panel


22


, which comprises the loop component of the hook-and-loop system. Loop panel


22


can be a fabric material manufactured to have a raised loop construction in which the fabric is stabilized, i.e., the individual loops are erect from the fabric's base, through a napping treatment. Panel


22


can also be any suitable material having non-woven loops thereon. Loop panel


22


is attached to front waist portion


16


of backsheet


4


such that the loops extend outwardly therefrom. The geometric shape of loop panel


22


can be any desired shape, such as rectangular, irregular, diamond, triangular, circular, oval, chevron, or the like. As illustrated, loop panel


22


is generally rectangular in shape.




Referring to

FIGS. 1-6

, loop panel


22


is bonded or attached to backsheet


4


in a manner that is unique and results in enhanced mechanical attaching, specifically increasing the peel, shear, and latching strengths of the attaching system. Rather than bonding the entire undersurface of loop panel


22


to the surface of backsheet


4


, only discrete or predetermined sections of panel


22


are attached or bonded to backsheet


4


, thereby leaving portions of loop panel


22


unattached and free to move relative to backsheet


4


. By thus controlling the bonding or attaching pattern of loop panel


22


, the peel, shear, and latching properties of the hook-and-loop system are significantly enhanced, as graphically illustrated in FIG.


7


.




Referring specifically to

FIGS. 5 and 6

, a roll of loop material


24


is unwound from reel


26


and passed below hot melt die


28


that is in fluid communication with hopper


30


, which contains a hot melt adhesive. The hot melt adhesive is applied by running loop material


24


under die


28


which applies spaced-apart beads


32


of adhesive onto loop material


24


in the machine direction, as illustrated by the arrow in FIG.


5


. Since beads


32


are spaced apart, they naturally form spaces


34


therebetween.




The apparatus in

FIG. 5

further includes a cutting device


36


including blade


38


, which is reciprocated downwardly to cut a plurality of loop panels


22


from loop material


24


.




The adhesive beads


32


range in their width from about 1 millimeter to about 15 millimeters, and the width of each space


34


is generally in the range from about 1 millimeter to about 30 millimeters. In one preferred embodiment, beads


32


are 3 millimeters in width, and are spaced about 3 millimeters apart, i.e., spaces


34


have a width of about 3 millimeters. Loop panel


22


is then attached to backsheet


4


between ear sections


20


, as illustrated in FIG.


1


.




As illustrated in

FIGS. 5 and 6

, adhesive beads


32


are applied in a parallel, linear fashion, but the present invention contemplates application of adhesive beads


32


in any desired pattern as long as the resulting application produces spaced-apart areas of adhesive, such as beads


32


.




Referring to

FIGS. 1-4

,


8


,


9


, each ear portion


18


includes a hook tab


40


extending outwardly thereon and including a plurality of hook members


42


for engaging a plurality of loop members


44


. As illustrated in FIG.


3


and

FIG. 9

, each individual hook member


42


can face a single direction. However, the present invention contemplates that the hook members


22


can be oriented in two or more directions. For example, a first predetermined set of rows of hook members


42


could face inwardly, as illustrated in

FIG. 3

, while other predetermined remaining rows can have their hook members


42


facing in an opposite direction. Alternatively, individual ones of hook members


42


can be oriented in any different number of directions as required.




Hook members


42


can have any desired geometry or shape, and can be made of any suitable material. Hook members


42


can be made of a nylon material, or of materials represented in

FIG. 15

as unidirectional HTH 706, HTH 707, or HTH 708 that can be purchased from Velcro Industries B.V., Amsterdam, Netherlands or affiliates thereof. Shapes of members


42


can be hook-, mushroom-shaped, or any other desired shape. Hook member density on a respective hook tab


40


is generally within the range of about 30 to about 160 hooks per square centimeter, and preferably about 115 hooks per square centimeter. Each hook tab


40


also may have a row density within the range of about 3 to about 30 rows per lineal centimeter of width, and preferably a row density of about 15 rows per lineal centimeter. Naturally, these ranges of hook density and row density can vary and be dependent upon the peel and shear characteristics of the type and geometry of material used.




The present invention contemplates interchanging the position or placement of the hook members and loop members on their particular garment or article.




Referring now to

FIG. 8

, there is illustrated an enlarged side elevational view of backsheet


4


having attached thereto loop panel


22


and its loop members


44


by the spaced-apart adhesive beads


32


. Between beads


32


are spaces


34


in which loop panel


22


is unattached to backsheet


4


. Upon engaging a respective hook tab


40


to loop panel


22


such that hook members


42


engage loop members


44


, and upon application of a tension as illustrated by the arrow in

FIG. 9

, loop panel


22


will distort or flex with a plurality of buckles


46


. This generally results in an increase in the peel, shear, and/or latching strengths between hook tabs


40


and loop panel


22


. As graphically illustrated in

FIG. 7

, graph line C illustrates the closure force of a conventional hook-and-loop system in which the loop panel is totally adhered to its substrate. In contrast, graph line I illustrates the increase in closure force provided by the present invention in which loop panel


22


is intermittently or discretely attached to its backsheet


4


. Without being bound to any specific theory or mechanism, it has been found that the increase in peel, shear, and latching strengths results from intermittent attachment of loop panel


22


to backsheet


4


, thereby forming a plurality of buckles


46


when hook tabs


40


are engaged under tension to loop panel


22


. A preferred tension range is between about 50 grams per inch to about 500 grams per inch.




Referring now to

FIG. 10

, diaper


48


illustrates another embodiment of the present invention. Diaper


48


is identical to diaper


2


except in the following description. Each ear portion


18


has joined thereto hook tab


50


having a plurality of hook members


42


disposed on both inner surface


52


and outer surface


54


of a respective hook tab


50


. Generally, hook tab


50


can be made of a stretchable or elastomeric material, or hook tab


50


can be joined to a respective ear portion


18


by an intermediate strip of stretchable or elastic material that joins hook tab


50


to ear portion


18


.




Front waist portion


16


of backsheet


4


has disposed thereon two separate loop panels


56


,


58


. Since loop panels


56


,


58


are identical, a description of only loop panel


56


will be made. Loop panel


56


includes loop panel base


60


joined to backsheet


4


and loop panel flap


62


which is hingedly connected to loop panel base


60


, as illustrated in FIG.


10


. This permits loop panel flap


62


to be folded back and forth between a generally unfolded position, in which it is substantially coplanar with loop panel base


60


, and a folded position, in which it is folded over and on top of loop panel base


60


such that their respective loop members


44


are in mutually facing relationship.




Referring to

FIGS. 10 and 11

, upon placing diaper


48


about the wearer, each ear portion


18


is drawn around the waist section of the wearer and a respective hook tab


50


is stretched, i.e., placed under tension, as necessary for a proper fit, and placed against loop panel base


60


to engage hook members


42


on inner surface


52


with loop members


44


of loop panel base


60


. Loop panel flap


62


is then folded over and engaged with hook tab


50


such that loop members


44


of loop panel flaps


62


engage hook members


52


on outer surface


54


of hook tab


40


. Although

FIG. 11

illustrates hook members


52


as having their open or mouth ends oriented in the same direction, hook members


52


may be multiply directed as required to provide the desired attachment.




Referring to

FIG. 12

, graph line A represents the closure force of a conventional hook-and-loop system without a loop panel flap, and graph line P illustrates the present invention in which loop panel flap


62


and loop panel base


60


trap hook members


52


of hook tab


50


.




Referring to

FIG. 13A

, a conventional hook-and-loop system in an untensioned state is illustrated. Because of the untensioned state, there is a certain amount of looseness or play between individual hooks and loops that can result in a less than desirable fastening system. In contrast,

FIG. 13B

illustrates the hook-and-loop system of the present invention in a tensioned state that causes the hooks to be engaged firmly without play with their respective loops. This increases the stability and performance of the fastening system.




For example,

FIGS. 14 and 15

illustrate the increase in latching forces for hooks made of different materials as tension is increased. Thus, regardless of the hook material or article with which the fastening system of the present invention may be used, tension enhances the performance of all systems to some degree.




TEST PROCEDURES




Peel Test Procedure




Peel is determined according to ASTM Designation D1876-72, “Standard Test Methods for Peel Resistance of Adhesives (T-Peel Test)”, subject to the following modification: No test panels are used; hook-and-loop materials are directly engaged and are not mounted on any other substrate unless specified. Test direction of the materials should be noted. No panels are used. The engaged test materials are rolled five cycles; where one cycle equals once in each direction. The hook material is clamped into the upper jaw and the loop material is clamped into the lower jaw.




Shear Test Procedure




Shear is determined according to ASTM Designation D3654-82, “Standard Test Method for Holding Power of Pressure-Sensitive Tapes”, and which is subject to the following modification: In relation to the test, the closure is placed under an increasing load. The system being tested is a hook-and-loop closure system. The apparatus should include an “INSTRON” or equivalent tensile tester. In carrying out the procedure, test direction of the materials should be noted. The test materials are rolled five cycles (one square inch), where one cycle equals once in each direction. The hook material is clamped into the lower jaw of the INSTRON tensile tester. The engaged system (hook-and-loop) is pulled until failure. In doing calculations, the peak load is determined and recorded in grams.




Latching Test Procedure




Latching force is measured by applying a hook material to a loop material, applying a lateral force to the interface between the hook and loop materials, and then separating the hook and loop materials with a vertical force. The amount of vertical force necessary to separate the two materials is the peak force, or load in grams, and determines the latching force. This test method measures the effect of tension, such as that applied by an elastic member, on a hook-and-loop closure system. In this test, the phrase “latching force” means the force required to disengage a hook material from a loop material resulting from a pull perpendicular to the plane of attachment of the materials to which a fixed lateral force is applied. The phrase “lateral force” means a force applied in parallel to the interface of the hook and loop materials, and the phrase “vertical force” means a force applied perpendicular to the interface of the hook and loop materials.




Referring to

FIG. 16

, there is illustrated the upper grips


70


of a suitable tensile testing machine, such as an Instron tensile tester commercially available from Instron Corporation, Canton, Mass. A suspension line


72


is connected to a plate


73


held by the upper grips


70


of the tensile testing machine and hangs downwardly therefrom. Force gauge


74


is horizontally mounted and is selectively moveable in the horizontal by means of threaded rod


76


. Force gauge


74


includes a spring


78


. Latching force test fixture


80


is used to fix a stainless steel test panel


82


in a stationary position. Hook material mounting block


84


includes a vertically oriented eye screw


86


connected to suspension line


72


and a horizontally disposed eye screw


88


connected to spring


78


.




A hook-and-loop closure system is tested by mounting the hook material on the undersurface of hook material mounting block


84


and mounting a loop material on the top surface of test panel


82


, and then utilizing a lateral force applied by threaded rod


76


and force gauge


74


and a vertical force applied by upper grips


70


of the tensile testing machine. This test method is used to analyze the effect of tension on a hook-and-loop closure system particularly when the hooks are oriented in the direction of the applied tension force.




The tensile testing machine used can be any suitable machine that can supply a constant rate of extension having a rate of traverse of about 305 millimeters per minute. Test panel


82


preferably has the dimensions of 51 millimeters ×152 millimeters. Hook material mounting block


84


should be made of aluminum having a mounting surface with a dimension of about 25 millimeters ×25 millimeters.




The test procedure occurs in generally two stages, one being the preparation of the test specimens and the other being the determination of the latching force. The preparation of test specimens includes cutting a 25 millimeter square specimen of the hook material and attaching it to the hook material mounting block


84


with a two-sided adhesive tape that has an adhesive strength greater than the hook-and-loop closure system being tested. The hook material should be mounted in a manner that will enable any directionality of the hooks to be utilized in the most efficient manner with regard to the tensioning force. The loop material is cut to have the dimensions of about 37.5 millimeters ×152 millimeters and then attached to the stainless steel test panel


82


so that there is approximately 6 millimeters distance between the edge of the loop specimen and the edge of the test panel


82


. Again, a two-sided adhesive tape is used to attach the loop material with the tape having a greater adhesive strength than the hook-and-loop closure system.




The determination of the latching force is accomplished by first inserting an empty test panel


82


in latching force test fixture


80


. An empty hook material mounting block


84


is centered in the upper grips


70


by means of suspension line


72


and plate


73


. Hook material mounting block


84


is then positioned to slightly rest on test panel


82


with minimal slack in suspension line


72


. The empty test panel is then replaced with a test panel


82


having the loop material attached thereto. Hook material mounting block


84


, which has the material attached to its undersurface, is then placed on top of the loop material without applying any pressure. A lateral force (for example, about 500 grams) is then selectively applied by means of force gauge


74


and threaded rod


76


. Thereafter, the tensile testing machine is activated to apply a vertical force until the hook and loop materials are separated. The applied vertical force, at which the hook and loop materials separate, is the latching force for the applied lateral force. The peak load is reported as latching force (sometimes referred to as “latching resistance” or “peak latching load”).




While this invention has been described as having preferred embodiments, it will be understood that it is capable of further modifications. This application is therefore intended to cover any equivalents, variations, uses, or adaptations of the invention following the general principles thereof, and including such departures from the present disclosure as come within known or customary practice in the art to which this invention pertains and fall within the limits of the appended claims.



Claims
  • 1. A diaper, said diaper defining a front waist portion, a rear waist portion having ear portions, and an intermediate portion between said front waist portion and said rear waist portion, said diaper comprising:a back sheet; a top sheet; an absorbent medium therebetween; a distortable loop panel comprising a plurality of loop members, said loop panel being attached to said back sheet in the front waist portion of said diaper, said loop panel being distortable into a plurality of buckles; and a hook tab extending from each of said ear portions, said hook tabs including a plurality of hook members for engaging a plurality of loop members, said hook tabs including an elastic material which can exert a tension of from about 50 grams per inch to about 500 grams per inch to said hook members and said loop members when said hook members and said loop members are engaged whereby said loop panel is distorted into a plurality of buckles.
  • 2. The diaper according to claim 1 wherein said front waist portion includes ear sections.
  • 3. The diaper according to claim 2 wherein said loop panel is disposed between said ear sections.
  • 4. The diaper according to claim 3 wherein said loop panel is generally rectangular in shape.
  • 5. The article of claim 3 wherein said loop panel is intermittently attached to a front edge portion of said diaper.
  • 6. The article of claim 1 wherein said hook tabs have a hook member density of from about 30 to about 160 hooks per square centimeter.
  • 7. The article of claim 6 wherein said hook tabs have a hook member density of about 115 hooks per square centimeter.
  • 8. The article of claim 6 wherein said hook tabs have a row density of from about 3 to about 30 rows per lineal centimeter of width.
  • 9. The article of claim 1 wherein said hook members exhibit a latching resistance, when engaged with a 19902 loop under 200 grams tension, of at least 5,000 grams.
  • 10. A diaper, said diaper defining a front waist portion, a rear waist portion and an intermediate portion between said front waist portion and said rear waist portion, said diaper comprising:a back sheet; a top sheet; an absorbent medium therebetween; a distortable loop panel comprising a plurality of loop members disposed on said front waist portion, said loop panel being distortable into a plurality of buckles; two hook tabs, comprising a plurality of hook members for engaging said loop members, each hook tab extending outwardly from said rear waist portion, said hook members being hook- or mushroom-shaped; and a tensioning mechanism for engaging said hook tabs to said loop panel under tension whereby said loop panel is distorted into a plurality of buckles.
  • 11. The diaper according to claim 10 wherein said hook member are oriented in the direction of the width of the diaper.
Parent Case Info

This application is a divisional of application Ser. No. 08/233,843 entitled ABSORBENT ARTICLE HAVING AN IMPROVED FASTENING SYSTEM and filed in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office on Apr. 26, 1994 now U.S. Pat. No. 5,984,911, which is a divisional of application Ser. No. 07/906,016 filed on Jun. 26, 1992, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,318,555, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. Ser. No. 07/628,251 filed on Dec. 17, 1990, now abandoned.

US Referenced Citations (200)
Number Name Date Kind
2511406 Israel Jun 1950
2524842 Slamon et al. Oct 1950
2649858 Bolt Aug 1953
2936758 Csulits May 1960
3081772 Brooks et al. Mar 1963
3110312 Wirth Nov 1963
3138841 Naimer Jun 1964
3141461 Farris Jul 1964
3146778 Krawiec Sep 1964
3147528 Erb Sep 1964
3150664 Noel Sep 1964
3180335 Duncan et al. Apr 1965
3196511 Kintner Jul 1965
3315676 Cooper Apr 1967
3318632 Struble et al. May 1967
3359980 Rosenblatt Dec 1967
3559648 Mason, Jr. Feb 1971
3572342 Lindquist et al. Mar 1971
3599640 Larson Aug 1971
3618608 Brink Nov 1971
3620217 Gellert Nov 1971
3630201 Endres Dec 1971
3653381 Warnken Apr 1972
3694867 Stumpf Oct 1972
3710425 Brumlik Jan 1973
3779246 Mesek et al. Dec 1973
3800796 Jacob Apr 1974
3825006 Ralph Jul 1974
3840945 Brumlik Oct 1974
3848594 Buell Nov 1974
3860003 Buell Jan 1975
3863304 Brumlik Feb 1975
3869761 Schaar Mar 1975
3879835 Brumlik Apr 1975
3882871 Taniguchi May 1975
3889322 Brumlik Jun 1975
3899803 Brumlik Aug 1975
3900652 Uraya et al. Aug 1975
3913183 Brumlik Oct 1975
3920018 Schaar Nov 1975
3922455 Brumlik Nov 1975
3927674 Schaar Dec 1975
3931666 Karami Jan 1976
3950824 Karami Apr 1976
3955575 Okuda May 1976
3963029 Brooks Jun 1976
3989048 Cepuritis et al. Nov 1976
4005712 Karami Feb 1977
4014340 Cheslow Mar 1977
4022210 Glassman May 1977
4036233 Kozak Jul 1977
4047530 Karami Sep 1977
4049001 Tritsch Sep 1977
4050463 Schaar Sep 1977
4051854 Aaron Oct 1977
4056281 Byrnes Nov 1977
4074397 Rosin Feb 1978
4081301 Buell Mar 1978
4114621 Mims, Jr. Sep 1978
4127132 Karami Nov 1978
4158906 Watson Jun 1979
4166464 Korpman Sep 1979
4169303 Lemelson Oct 1979
4180890 Brumlik Jan 1980
4205679 Repke et al. Jun 1980
4229835 Shaw Oct 1980
4230113 Mehta Oct 1980
4241462 Tagawa et al. Dec 1980
4259957 Sonenstein et al. Apr 1981
4290174 Kalleberg Sep 1981
4299223 Cronkrite Nov 1981
4315508 Bolick Feb 1982
4322875 Brown et al. Apr 1982
4338939 Daville Jul 1982
4352355 Mesek et al. Oct 1982
4380450 Reich Apr 1983
4381781 Sciaraffa et al. May 1983
4388075 Mesek et al. Jun 1983
4397645 Buell Aug 1983
4402690 Redfern Sep 1983
4410327 Baggaley Oct 1983
4425128 Motomura Jan 1984
4430086 Repke Feb 1984
4475912 Coates Oct 1984
4509512 LeClercq Apr 1985
4522874 Pommez Jun 1985
4537591 Coates Aug 1985
4541154 Ito et al. Sep 1985
4560381 Southwell Dec 1985
4568342 Davis Feb 1986
4568344 Suzuki et al. Feb 1986
4573986 Minetola et al. Mar 1986
4576599 Lipner Mar 1986
4576601 Brain Mar 1986
4577591 Wesseldine Mar 1986
4578066 O'Connor Mar 1986
4581772 Smith Apr 1986
4585450 Rosch et al. Apr 1986
4596568 Flug Jun 1986
4604096 Dean et al. Aug 1986
4609581 Ott Sep 1986
4610678 Weisman et al. Sep 1986
4610680 LaFleur Sep 1986
4610682 Kopp Sep 1986
4615695 Cooper Oct 1986
4617022 Pigneul et al. Oct 1986
4623339 Ciraldo et al. Nov 1986
4626305 Suzuki et al. Dec 1986
4639949 Ales et al. Feb 1987
4642110 Dudek Feb 1987
4642819 Ales et al. Feb 1987
4646362 Heran et al. Mar 1987
4650481 O'Connor et al. Mar 1987
4657539 Hasse Apr 1987
4661102 Shikata et al. Apr 1987
4662877 Williams May 1987
4671793 Hults et al. Jun 1987
4673402 Weisman et al. Jun 1987
4675015 Brown Jun 1987
4680030 Coates et al. Jul 1987
4681581 Coates Jul 1987
4687477 Suzuki et al. Aug 1987
4695278 Lawson Sep 1987
4699622 Toussant et al. Oct 1987
4701172 Stevens Oct 1987
4701179 Kellenberger et al. Oct 1987
4704116 Enloe Nov 1987
4704117 Mitchell Nov 1987
4705710 Matsuda Nov 1987
4710414 Northrup et al. Dec 1987
4725473 Van Gompel et al. Feb 1988
4728326 Gilles Mar 1988
4738677 Foreman Apr 1988
4743246 Lawson May 1988
4753649 Pazdernik Jun 1988
4753650 Williams Jun 1988
4753840 Van Gompel Jun 1988
4761318 Ott et al. Aug 1988
4770656 Proxmire et al. Sep 1988
4770917 Tochacek et al. Sep 1988
4772282 Oakley Sep 1988
4773906 Krushel Sep 1988
4776068 Smirlock et al. Oct 1988
4778701 Pape et al. Oct 1988
4795452 Blaney et al. Jan 1989
4795454 Dragoo Jan 1989
4808176 Kielpikowski Feb 1989
4822435 Igaue et al. Apr 1989
4834738 Kielpikowski et al. May 1989
4834740 Suzuki et al. May 1989
4834742 Wilson et al. May 1989
4835795 Lonon Jun 1989
4846815 Scripps Jul 1989
4846823 Enloe Jul 1989
4847134 Fahrenkrug et al. Jul 1989
4850988 Aledo et al. Jul 1989
4854136 Coslovi et al. Aug 1989
4857067 Wood et al. Aug 1989
4861399 Rajala et al. Aug 1989
4861652 Lippert et al. Aug 1989
4869724 Scripps Sep 1989
4870725 Dubowik Oct 1989
4880420 Pomparelli Nov 1989
4883480 Huffman et al. Nov 1989
4884713 Handler Dec 1989
4887338 Handler Dec 1989
4887339 Bellanger Dec 1989
4891868 Watanabe Jan 1990
4892528 Suzuki et al. Jan 1990
4894060 Nestegard Jan 1990
4895568 Enloe Jan 1990
4904251 Igaue et al. Feb 1990
4909803 Aziz et al. Mar 1990
4916005 Lippert et al. Apr 1990
4917696 De Jonckheere Apr 1990
4936840 Proxmire Jun 1990
4938753 Van Gompel et al. Jul 1990
4938754 Mesek Jul 1990
4938757 Van Gompel et al. Jul 1990
4940464 Van Gompel et al. Jul 1990
4963140 Robertson et al. Oct 1990
4973326 Wood et al. Nov 1990
4978570 Heyn et al. Dec 1990
4981480 Gaudet et al. Jan 1991
4988344 Reising et al. Jan 1991
4988346 Pfefferkorn Jan 1991
4988560 Meyer et al. Jan 1991
4994054 Pigneul et al. Feb 1991
5019065 Scripps May 1991
5019072 Polski May 1991
5019073 Roessler et al. May 1991
5053028 Zoia et al. Oct 1991
5057097 Gesp Oct 1991
5108384 Goulait Apr 1992
5176671 Roessler et al. Jan 1993
5242436 Weil et al. Sep 1993
5279604 Robertson et al. Jan 1994
5318555 Siebers et al. Jun 1994
5403302 Roessler et al. Apr 1995
5984911 Siebers et al. Nov 1999
Foreign Referenced Citations (90)
Number Date Country
7474625 Oct 1974 AU
88 591 Dec 1921 DE
906 365 Mar 1954 DE
1 070 779 Dec 1959 DE
2 504 210 Aug 1975 DE
34 19 623 A1 May 1984 DE
3 317 117 Jun 1984 DE
3 533 881 Apr 1986 DE
0 013 463 A1 Jul 1980 EP
0 080 647 A1 Jun 1983 EP
0 131 490 A1 Jan 1985 EP
0 155 155 A2 Sep 1985 EP
0 187 725 B1 Jul 1986 EP
0 191 355 A1 Aug 1986 EP
0 194 453 A1 Sep 1986 EP
0 233 364 A2 Aug 1987 EP
0 235 014 B1 Sep 1987 EP
0 240 213 B1 Oct 1987 EP
0 262 447 A2 Apr 1988 EP
0 276 890 A2 Aug 1988 EP
0 276 970 B1 Aug 1988 EP
0 321 232 B1 Jun 1989 EP
0 319 249 B1 Jun 1989 EP
0 324 577 B1 Jul 1989 EP
0 324 578 B1 Jul 1989 EP
0 338 680 A2 Oct 1989 EP
0 278 866 B1 Dec 1991 EP
0 476 992 B1 Mar 1992 EP
0 323 040 B1 Aug 1992 EP
0 529 681 B1 Mar 1993 EP
0 321 234 B2 May 1993 EP
0 403 832 B1 Oct 1994 EP
0 396 050 B1 Mar 1995 EP
0 374 730 B2 Apr 2000 EP
2 105 683 Apr 1972 FR
2 335 165 Jul 1977 FR
2 558 691 Aug 1985 FR
2 564 298 Nov 1985 FR
2 594 650 Aug 1987 FR
2 606 257 May 1988 FR
493819 Oct 1938 GB
678769 Sep 1952 GB
918084 Feb 1963 GB
1067730 May 1967 GB
1095397 Dec 1967 GB
1299897 Dec 1972 GB
1318957 May 1973 GB
1326098 Aug 1973 GB
1428572 Mar 1976 GB
1430747 Apr 1976 GB
1516287 Jul 1978 GB
1523018 Aug 1978 GB
2035053A Jun 1980 GB
2074011 Oct 1981 GB
2091986A Aug 1982 GB
2101875A Jan 1983 GB
2131346B Jun 1984 GB
2135568A Sep 1984 GB
2142541A Jan 1985 GB
2142542A Jan 1985 GB
2142242A Jan 1985 GB
2142241A Jan 1985 GB
2144637 Mar 1985 GB
2148095A May 1985 GB
2164542A Mar 1986 GB
2165457A Apr 1986 GB
2129689 Oct 1986 GB
2185383A Jul 1987 GB
2209672 May 1989 GB
2233876 Jan 1991 GB
49-115139 Oct 1974 JP
49-120438 Oct 1974 JP
49-144438 Dec 1974 JP
53-158440 Dec 1978 JP
54-105738 Jul 1979 JP
56-11243 Feb 1981 JP
57-138908 Aug 1982 JP
57-161101 Oct 1982 JP
57-191303 Nov 1982 JP
57-191304 Nov 1982 JP
58-143809 Sep 1983 JP
59-165407 Nov 1984 JP
60-9908 Jan 1985 JP
63-27089 Jan 1988 JP
63-131710 Aug 1988 JP
63-61402 Nov 1988 JP
WO 8303754 Nov 1983 WO
WO 8404242 A1 Nov 1984 WO
WO 8602263 Apr 1986 WO
WO 9525496 A2 Sep 1995 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (21)
Entry
American Society for Testing Materials (ASTM) Designation: D 1876-72 (Reapproved 1983), Standard Test Method for Peel Resistance of Adhesives (T-Peel Test), pp. 139-142, published Oct. 1972.
American Society for Testing Materials (ASTM) Designation: D 3654-82, “Standard Test Methods for Holding Power Of Pressure-Sensitive Tapes [Metric],” published Oct. 1982.
Notification Report for German Patent Application DT 2322492, “Diaper Lining,” by Takasi Taniguchi, May 4, 1973.
Request for Proof, Japanese Design Registration Laid Open JP 55-103208 U, by K.K. Nishiki, Oct. 19, 1995.
Request for Proof, Japanese Design Registration Laid Open JP 56-70812 U, by Yoshio Kakuto, Oct. 19, 1995.
Request for Proof, Japanese Design Registration Laid Open JP 59-88407 U, by Kao Sekken K.K., Nov. 24, 1995.
American Society for Testing Materials (ASTM) Designation: D 1876-72 (Reapproved 1983), Standard Test Method for Peel Resistance of Adhesives (T-Peel Test), pp. 139-142, published Oct. 1972.
American Society for Testing Materials (ASTM) Designation: D 3654-82, “Standard Testing Methods for Holding Power Of Pressure-Sensitive Tapes [Metric],” published Oct. 1982.
“AMF Hook & Loop Tape Attacher Programmed For Industrial Uses,” Bobbin Magazine, Apr. 1987, p. 130.
“Closing In On New Markets,” written by Dr. Annette J. Fraser, Bobbin Magazine, Dec. 1987, pp. 104, 106, 108-109.
“Closures Become Fashion,” written by Timothy Wilson, Bobbin Magazine, Dec. 1986, pp. 94, 96, 98.
“Your Baby's First Year” (Time-Life Book Inc. 1986), pp. 38-41.
“Consumer Guide® Baby Equipment Buying Guide” Signet (Copyright Publications International, Ltd. 1985), pp. 106-109.
“Poly-Lock Fastener Has Industrial Applications,” Industrial Fabric Products Review, Nov. 1986, pp. 62, 64.
Instruction panel for PAMPERS® Phases diapers, with Warning, Caution, disposal information, Packaging Information, and Product Information, Protector &Gamble, 1990.
Update 84 “Absorbent Products Markets—Part 1 (Tampons, Diapers, Feminine Pads),” vol. 1, Diapers; published by Marketing/Technology Service, Dec. 1984, Section III, pp. 27-28.
“. . . And Velcro Fitted Nappies,” Medical Textiles, vol. 1, No. 1, May 1984, pp. 11-12.
“Easy-To-Fit Reusable Diaper,” Medical Textiles, vol. 3, No. 1, May 1986, pp. 9-10.
“A Gripping Success,” Dupont Magazine, May/Jun. 1985, pp. 26-27.
“Hook & Loop Fasteners,” written by Brian Lambert, Industrial Fabric Products Review, Sep. 1985, pp. 45-47.
“Self-Adhering Nylon Tapes,” written by Maurice Gershman, M.D., Journal of American Medical Association, vol. 168, No. 7, Oct. 18, 1958, p. 930.
Continuation in Parts (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 07/628251 Dec 1990 US
Child 07/906016 US