The disclosure generally relates to absorbent mats and, more particularly, to a frameless floor mat for placement beneath urinals and commodes in restrooms.
It is known in the art to maintain sanitary conditions in restrooms near toilets and wall-mounted urinals using trays, mats, or sheets. This is especially the case in public restrooms where unwanted moisture, odor and bacteria on the floors commonly present sanitary and aesthetic problems and potential safety risks.
For example, U.S. Pat. No. 4,125,656 to Creamer shows a pleated absorbent sheet for use around the base of a pedestal toilet to absorb moisture. Undesirably, the pleated Creamer sheet is small and only suitable to absorb condensation dripping down the sides of the pedestal of a toilet. As such, it is not suitable for use at a wall-mounted urinal. The Creamer sheet also does not aid in collecting drips or spills attributable to the user himself, or the flushing action, condensation, or any other occurrence causing liquid to pool underneath the urinal. The time-consuming and complicated pleating, folding, and adjustment features of the Creamer sheet further reduce its usefulness.
Other known absorbent sheets are designed to be held within bulky, rigid trays or frames. These trays themselves are known to collect moisture and unsanitary bacteria, and likewise can malodorous. They are also expensive to manufacture, creating a hesitancy for consumers to dispose of the soiled tray. Also, the trays are usually unattractive, especially after extended use. Thus, they usually do not reduce cleaning time, nor do they necessarily provide the desired improved sanitary environment.
One further concern with known absorbent sheets is the risk of the sheet slipping out of position while in use. Again, unsatisfactory attempts to prevent this problem have been made. Some products secure a sheet or a collection of sheets through use of strings, tape, or staples. These additional materials make the sheets both more difficult to manufacture, and more time-consuming to install and remove. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 2,057,162 to Richey utilizes strings to tie absorbent sheets to toilet pedestals. Not only is the Richey sheet difficult to install, but it is also unsanitary since the attendant must reach behind the toilet to install the sheet.
There is a continuing need for an absorbent mat for use in restrooms and elsewhere underneath urinals and commodes. Desirably, the absorbent mat is inexpensive, foldable, easy to install, and easy to remove.
In concordance with the instant disclosure, an absorbent mat for use in restrooms and elsewhere underneath urinals and commodes, and which is inexpensive, foldable, easy to install, and easy to remove, has been surprisingly discovered.
In one embodiment, an absorbent mat includes an absorbent layer, a protective layer, and an intermediate adhesive layer. The absorbent layer has a first section and a second section. At least one folding axis separates the first section from the second section. The absorbent layer further has a peripheral free edge that bounds the first section and the second section. The intermediate adhesive layer is affixed to the absorbent layer and disposed between the absorbent layer and the protective layer. The protective layer is removably attached to the intermediate adhesive layer. The intermediate adhesive layer further has a dry edge area disposed adjacent the peripheral free edge of the absorbent layer. There is no significant adhesion between the dry edge area and the protective layer.
In another embodiment, an absorbent mat for a urinal includes an absorbent layer, a protective layer, and an intermediate adhesive layer. The absorbent layer has a first section and a second section. At least one folding axis separates the first section from the second section. The absorbent layer further has a peripheral free edge that bounds the first section and the second section. The peripheral free edge of the first section has a first side edge, a second side edge, and a front edge. The first side edge is angled generally toward the second side edge, and the second side edge is angled generally toward the first side edge. The front edge connects the first side edge to the second side edge. The peripheral free edge of the second section has a rear edge that is spaced apart from and disposed opposite on the absorbent layer from the front edge. The intermediate adhesive layer is affixed to the absorbent layer. The protective layer is removably attached to the intermediate adhesive layer. The protective layer has at least one split that defines a plurality of protective portions of the protective layer. Each of the protective portions is removably attached to the intermediate adhesive layer. The intermediate adhesive layer further has a dry edge area disposed immediately adjacent to the rear edge of the second section of the absorbent layer. There is no significant adhesion between the dry edge area and the protective layer. The absorbent mat is configured to be placed adjacent to the urinal. More particularly, the second section of the absorbent layer is configured to be placed beneath the urinal.
In a further embodiment, an absorbent mat for a commode includes an absorbent layer, a protective layer, and an intermediate adhesive layer. The absorbent layer has a first section and a second section. At least one folding axis separates the first section from the second section. The absorbent layer further has a peripheral free edge that bounds the first section and the second section. The peripheral free edge of the first section has a front edge, and the peripheral free edge of the second section has a rear edge spaced apart from and disposed opposite on the absorbent layer from the front edge. The absorbent layer is generally U-shaped with the first section including a first arm and a second arm. The first arm is spaced apart from the second arm and a gap is formed therebetween. The intermediate adhesive layer is affixed to the absorbent layer. The protective layer is removably attached to the intermediate adhesive layer. The protective layer has at least one split that defines a plurality of protective portions of the protective layer. Each of the protective portions is removably attached to the intermediate adhesive layer. The intermediate adhesive layer further has a dry edge area disposed immediately adjacent to the rear edge of the second section of the absorbent layer. There is no significant adhesion between the dry edge area and the protective layer. The absorbent mat is configured to be placed adjacent to the commode. The second section of the absorbent layer is configured to be placed in front of a base of the commode and the gap is configured to receive the base of the commode.
The above, as well as other advantages of the present disclosure, will become readily apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description, particularly when considered in the light of the drawings described hereafter.
The following description is merely exemplary in nature and is not intended to limit the present disclosure, application, or uses. It should also be understood that throughout the drawings, corresponding reference numerals indicate like or corresponding parts and features. In respect of the methods disclosed, the order of the steps presented is exemplary in nature, and thus, is not necessary or critical unless otherwise disclosed.
An absorbent mat 2 for use with urinals or commodes is shown in
Although described primarily herein as a discrete unit, for example, that may be folded and stored or shipped in a box as shown in
Advantageously, the absorbent layer 4 is configured to repeatedly absorb fluids, such as water or urine, that may be splashed onto the absorbent mat 2 in operation. The absorbent mat 2 is adapted to absorb fluids without becoming undesirably slippery, tearing, or degrading quickly with repeated use adjacent urinals and commodes.
In particular embodiments, the absorbent layer 4 may be formed from a non-woven textile material. For example, the absorbent layer 4 may be formed from a bonded polyester such as Magic Dragon™ (MD) 100-series nonwoven material. MD 100-series nonwoven material is a disposable non-woven textile comprised primarily of rayon, polyester and a binding agent, which is produced in bulk rolls for sale to third-party distributors by Sellars Absorbent Materials, Inc.
It has surprisingly been found that the MD 100-series of nonwoven materials is particularly suitable for the absorbent layer 4, due to their superior flexibility and resistance to degradation relative to other known materials. The MD 100-series has especially been found to be resistant to creasing upon being folded, as established further hereinbelow. In a most particular example, MD 105 nonwoven material may be used. However, one of ordinary skill in the art may also select other suitable materials for the absorbent layer 4, as desired.
The absorbent mat 2 may also have adjuvants for enhanced performance such as, for example, fragrances or odor-absorbing neutralizers like sodium bicarbonate. These materials may be applied to any of the absorbent layer 4, the intermediate adhesive layer 6, and the protective layer 8 of the absorbent mat 2, but in particular examples are embedded or intermixed with the fibers of the non-woven textile forming the absorbent layer 4. The adjuvants may also be added neat to one or more of the absorbent layer 4, the intermediate adhesive layer 6, and the protective layer 8 during assembly of the absorbent mat 2. The adjuvants may exist within the absorbent mat 2 in separate or distinct layers. Additionally, various antimicrobial compounds may be added to the absorbent layer 4, or to the intermediate adhesive layer 6 and the protective layer 8, as desired.
An upper surface of the absorbent layer 4 may also be provided with a mark- and wear-resistant pattern 12, for example, as shown in
It has been found that the use of circles or ovals as geometric elements in a grid-like pattern, connected with lines, is particularly useful for minimizing the visibility of splash marks on the upper surface. However, of ordinary skill in the art may select other suitable arrangements, geometric elements, and coloration for the pattern 12 within the scope of the present disclosure.
It should be appreciated that the mark- and wear-resistant pattern 12 may also be selected for purpose of maintaining aesthetics of the upper surface with repeated use at urinals and commodes. In certain examples, the mark- and wear-resistant pattern 12 may also provide an anti-slipping quality to the upper surface of the absorbent layer 4, for example, through use of ink with polymers or additives such as a silica grit that enhances the texture and grip of the upper surface of the absorbent layer 4. In further examples, the mark- and wear-resistant pattern 12 may be a message or an advertisement. Other types of markings for the mark- and wear-resistant pattern 12 may also be employed.
The absorbent layer 4 may also have superabsorbent materials. However, where the superabsorbent materials are used, it should be appreciated that they may be encapsulated or provided as a discrete layer beneath a topmost layer of the absorbent layer 4 to militate against a user slipping on the absorbent mat 2 in operation. For example, the superabsorbent materials may be starch-based, cellulose-based, or synthetic. In a most particular example, the superabsorbent materials are particulates of superabsorbent polymers (SAP) such as sodium polyacrylate. However, one of ordinary skill in the art may select other suitable superabsorbent materials, as desired.
The intermediate adhesive layer 6 of the present disclosure is configured to removably secure the absorbent mat 2 to a floor of a restroom. For example, as shown in
In other examples, the intermediate adhesive layer 6 may be sprayed or otherwise applied onto the bottom surface of the absorbent layer 4 to form a discrete layer of adhesive material. In a specific non-limiting example, the intermediate adhesive layer 6 may be formed from a discrete layer of acrylic emulsion adhesive. However, a skilled artisan may also select other suitable adhesives and methods for forming the intermediate adhesive layer 6, as desired.
With reference to
The protective layer 8 of the absorbent mat 2 may be divided into more than one portion 21, 23, for example, by a split 20 formed in the protective layer 8. The different portions 21, 23 may be selectively and independent removed from the absorbent mat 2 prior to final disposition at the urinal or commode. For example, the protective layer 8 may be separated by a cut formed therethrough that defines the split 20. In particular, the cut may extend across an entirety of the protective layer 8 from a first side to a second side of the absorbent mat 2. In another example, the split 20 may be defined by a row of perforations formed through the protective layer. It should be appreciated that the split 20 may create a plurality of the protective portions 21, 23 of the protective layer 8, where each of the protective portions 21, 23 is removably attached to the intermediate adhesive layer 6.
As shown in
Advantageously, the split 20 in the protective layer 8 may facilitate a folding of the absorbent mat 2 along the folding axis 22 in the absorbent layer 4. In certain embodiments, the split 20 may be coplanar with and define the folding axis 22, for example. It should be appreciated that the presence of the split 20 may facilitate the folding of the absorbent layer 4 and the intermediate adhesive layer 6, which otherwise together with the protective layer 8 may have an undesirably rigidity in the absence of the split 20. In particular, it should be appreciated that the split 20 allows the absorbent mat 2 to be easily and manually folded along the folding axis 22 for transport and storage, as shown in
With reference to
As shown in
The dry edge area 28 may disposed adjacent a border 30 of the second adhesive 18, as shown in
In particular example, the border 30 of the dry edge area 28 may be disposed between approximately one-half inch (0.5″) and two inches (2″) on average from the peripheral edge 10 of an end of the second section 26 of the absorbent layer 4, and more particularly disposed between approximately three-quarters inch (0.75″) and one and one-half inches (2″) on average from the peripheral edge 10, and most particularly disposed approximately one (1) inch on average from the peripheral edge 10. The border 30 may also be linear in shape and spaced apart from the peripheral edge 10 substantially evening along an entire length of the border 30, or may be disposed at an angle relative to the peripheral edge 10 and have portions that are closer or further from the peripheral edge depending on location on the length. One skilled in the art may also select other suitable widths and overall shapes for the dry edge area 28, as desired.
In certain embodiments, the dry edge area 28 may have a negligible amount of the second adhesive 18 remaining following the manufacturing process, but with no appreciable tackiness. For example, the dry edge area 28 may have either no adhesive or less than approximately 2 percent by weight relative to an original weight of the second adhesive 18 applied, i.e., less than approximately two percent by weight per unit area of the adhesive found at a remainder of the intermediate adhesive layer 6, more particularly less than approximately 1 percent by weight relative to the original weight of the second adhesive 18 applied, and most particularly less than approximately 0.2 percent by weight relative to the original weight of the second adhesive 18 applied prior to the removal process. In certain embodiments, there is no discernable amount of the second adhesive 18 remaining after the removal process. Other residual amounts of the second adhesive 18 that do not contribute to any appreciable tackiness of the dry edge area 28 are also contemplated and considered to be within the scope of the present disclosure.
In addition to advantageously facilitating the removal of the protect layer 8 prior to installation of the absorbent mat 2, described hereinabove, it should also be appreciated that the dry edge area 28 facilitates the removal of the absorbent mat 2 from the restroom floor following a period of use. In particular, the dry edge area 28 provides a surface with a negligible amount of the second adhesive 18, which allows the user to easily grip and peel the dry edge 28 upwardly from the floor of the restroom. This thereby facilitates the removal and replacement of the absorbent mat 2 with another absorbent mat 2 following the period of use.
It should be appreciated that an overall thickness of the absorbent device 2 may be selected by one skilled in the art to be suitable for use with urinals and commodes. For example, the absorbent layer 4 may be about forty-five (45) mil in thickness, and more particularly between thirty-nine (39) mil and fifty-one (51) mil in thickness. Where the intermediate adhesive layer 6 is in the laminate form, described hereinabove, the plastic sheet 14 may be about one (1) mil in thickness, and more particularly between two (2) mil and a tenth (0.1) mil in thickness. The first adhesive 16 may be about one (1) mil in thickness, and more particularly between two (2) mil and a tenth (0.1) mil in thickness. The second adhesive 18 may be about nine-tenths (0.9) mil in thickness, and more particularly between two (2) mil and a tenth (0.1) mil in thickness. Where the intermediate adhesive layer 6 is provided as the discrete layer of adhesive instead of the laminate, it should be appreciated that the thickness of the intermediate adhesive layer 6 may be about one (1) mil, and more particularly between two (2) mil and a tenth (0.1) mil in thickness. The protective layer 8 may be about three (3) mil in thickness, and more particularly between four (4) mil and two (2) mil in thickness. Overall, the absorbent mat 2 may therefore have a total thickness of about fifty (50) mil, and more particularly between fourth (40) mil and sixty (60) mil. One of ordinary skill in the art may also select other thicknesses for the absorbent layer 4, intermediate adhesive layer 6 (and its components), and the protective layer 8 within the scope of the instant disclosure.
With reference to
In one example, as shown in
In another example, as shown in
In a further example, as shown in
It should be appreciated that the crimped or compressed portion 31 may provide between a twenty-five percent (25%) and a seventy-five percent (75%) reduction in thickness relative to a standard core thickness of the absorbent device 2. It should be understood that the reduction in total thickness of the crimped or compressed portion 31 of the peripheral edge 10 will depend on the style and degree of crimping, for example, as described hereinabove with respect to the examples of
The crimped or compressed portion 31 may be between approximately one-fourth inch (0.25″) in width and approximately one inch (1″) inch in width, and more particularly approximately one-half inch (0.5″) in width. However, other suitable widths of the crimped or compressed portion 31 of the peripheral edge 10 may also be employed, as desired.
With renewed reference to
Advantageously, the absorbent mat 2 having the angled first and second side edges 34, 36 connected by the front edge 38 permits the first section 24 of the absorbent mat 2 to naturally fit between the user's feet (not shown) while the user is standing at the urinal. In this manner, the absorbent mat 2 is permitted to capture splatter of liquids such as urine but is not necessary stepped upon by the user, which optimizes a durability of the absorbent mat 2 over time.
The second section 26 of the absorbent layer 4 may have a rear edge 40 that is oriented generally parallel with the front edge 38 of the first section 24. In certain embodiments, as shown in
With renewed reference to
With reference to
The first arm 44 and the second arm 46 may each have a proximal end 52 and a distal end 56. The proximal end 52 of each arm may be connected to the second section 26 of the absorbent layer 4, as shown in
As shown in
With reference to
Furthermore, the dry edge area 28 may be disposed on the peripheral edge 10 at the second section 26 of the absorbent layer 4. Not only does the dry edge area 28 enable the user to easily remove the protective layer 8, as shown in
With reference to
With reference to
Furthermore, the absorbent layer 4 may also be manufactured using a crease-resistant material, as established hereinabove. For example, the material of the absorbent layer 4 may be folded and stored without retaining significant creasing when unfolded, yet also be rigid enough to endure wear associated with restrooms. Thus, the foldability of the absorbent mat 2 may be performed in accordance with the present disclosure without significantly affecting the aesthetics or appearance of the absorbent mat 2 when applied to the restroom floor as described further herein.
In operation, the protective layer 8 of the absorbent mat 2 may be removed. The removal of the protective layer 8 may begin by lifting the second portion 23 of the protective layer 8 at the dry edge area 28, as shown in
Once the protective layer 8 is fully removed from the intermediate adhesive layer 6, the absorbent mat 2 may be secured to the restroom floor by the intermediate adhesive layer 6, either beneath the urinal 32 or adjacent to the commode 42, as shown in
The preferred adhesive characteristics for the adhesive formulations used in the intermediate adhesive layer 6 of the present disclosure were determined using the standardized American Society for Testing and Material (ASTM) D3330 procedure. The ASTM D3330 procedure, published in July of 2010, is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. It is understood that the ASTM D3330 test procedure is equivalent to the Pressure Sensitive Tape Council (PSTC) 101 procedure, which was revised and published in 2007. The related PSTC 101 procedure is also incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
The test method described hereinbelow was performed according to Test Method A of the ASTM D3330 procedure. Test Method A measures the peel adhesion of single-coated tapes at a 180° Angle. The Test Method A of the ASTM D3330 procedure requires a test panel measuring 50 millimeters (mm) by 125 mm (2 inches (in.) by 5 in.) and no less than 1.1 mm (0.043 in.) thick. The material of the test panel used in the experiments detailed herein below was either stainless steel (SS) or vinyl. In particular, the stainless-steel test panel conformed to Type 302 or 304 stainless steel, having a bright annealed finish. The surface roughness height of the panel was approximately 50 nanometers (nm)+/−25 nm (2.0 micro-inches (μin)+1-1.0 μin.), calculated using an arithmetical average deviation from the mean line. Panels showing stains, discoloration, or scratches were not used.
The test panel was then washed with a solvent, such as Diacetone alcohol, Methanol, Methyl ethyl ketone (MEK), n-Heptane, or Acetone. The solvent was then wiped from the panel with fresh absorbent cleaning material (e.g., wool, cotton, tissue, etc.). The panel was washed with the chosen solvent and wiped a minimum of three times. After the test panel was cleaned, it was allowed to dry for at least 10 minutes. If the cleaned test panel was not used within 10 hours, it was recleaned before testing.
Tape, having the adhesive formulation to be test, was then removed from a sample roll by freely rotating the specimen roll at a rate between 500 millimeters per second (mm/s) and 750 mm/s (20 to 30 inches per second (in./s)). At least three but no more than six outer wraps of tape from the sample roll were discarded before removing specimens for testing. Each test specimen was cut from the sample roll using two single-edged razor blades in parallel planes, a precise distance apart, to form a cutter of exact specimen's widths. For each specimen, 300 mm (12 in.)+/−0.5 mm ( 1/64 in.) of adhesive tape, having a width of 24 mm (1 in.)+/−0.5 mm ( 1/64 in.), was removed to be tested. After the tape was removed, 12 mm (0.5 in.) of adhesive tape was folded at one end, adhesive to adhesive, to form a tab. Part of the specimen without the tab, was lightly adhered to an end of the test panel. The tabbed end of the specimen was positioned loosely above the test panel to avoid contact with the panel.
The tape was rolled, mechanically or by hand, twice on the test panel in a lengthwise direction to secure the tape to the panel. If a roller was used, the roller was a steel roller having a diameter between 85 mm+/−2.5 mm (3.25+/−0.1 in.), and a width of 45 mm+/−1.5 mm (1.75+/−0.05 in.). The roller was covered with rubber approximately 6 mm (0.25 in.) thick and having a shore scale durometer hardness of 80+/−5. The surface of the roller was a true cylinder, void of any convex or concave deviations. The mass of the roller was 2040 grams (g)+/−45 g (4.5 pounds (lbs)+/−0.1 lb). The roller was moved either mechanically or by hand at the rate of 10 millimeters per second (mm/s)+/−0.5 mm/s (24 inches per minute (in./min)+/−0.5 in./min). The tape was rolled onto the panel without an entrapment of air between the adhesive and the panel.
The panel and tabbed end of the tape were then secured within the constant-rate-of-extension (CRE) tension tester. The CRE tension tester had a first clamp and a second clamp with centers oriented in the same plane. The CRE tester has a means of moving the second clamp at a uniform rate of 5.0 mm/s+/−0.2 mm/s (12 in./min+/−0.5 in./min) and a device for recording the load. The clamps of the CRE tester were parallel with the direction of the motion and were aligned to hold the specimen wholly in the same plane. The CRE tester was calibrated to an accuracy of 0.5% of full scale and the scale range used for any test was such that the mean test level falls within 20% to 80% of full scale.
Each sample was individually prepared and tested within the desired time of the trial. Each of the samples was also tested at more than one of the desired times. In a first amount of desired time, the tape was rolled onto the panel and remained adhered to the panel for twenty minutes at room temperature. In a second amount of desired time, the tape was rolled onto the panel and remained adhered to the panel for one week at room temperature. In a third amount of desired time, the tape was rolled onto the panel, and remained adhered to the panel for one week at room temperature, and then for 72 hours at 150 degrees Fahrenheit.
After the desired time of the trial, when the adhesive tape was ready to be removed, the panel was clamped in the first jaw of the CRE tension testing machine, while the tabbed free end of the tape was clamped in the movable second jaw. The moveable second jaw was operated at 5.0 mm/s+/−0.2 mm/s (12+/−0.5 in./min). The first 25 mm (1 in.) of the tape peeled from the panel at an angle of 180° was disregarded. The average force obtained during the next 50 mm (2 in.) of tape peeled from the panel over was used to obtain the adhesion values.
Multiple types of adhesives were tested using the ASTM D3330 test procedure to establish the desired level of adhesion for the absorbent mat 2. The results of these tests including the adhesion values for various adhesives are found in TABLES 1-3, shown herein below.
As shown in TABLES 1-3, one of the adhesives tested was the Lab Sample Formulation 92 (LS92), which is a proprietary multi-polymer Pressure Sensitive Adhesive (PSA) formulation, developed by Polymeric Converting LLC, located in Enfield, Conn. The LS92 formulation uses building block adhesive technology and was developed by incorporating commercial ingredients from multiple sources.
The LS92 formulation employs a crosslinking co-reactant used to increase the crosslink density of acrylic resin functional groups. It was found that by increasing crosslink density, the adhesive matrix became more durable, fluid resistant, and easy to remove.
It was also discovered that by increasing the crosslinking of the acrylic resin functional groups, the measured peel strength may be increased, while the tack of the synthesized PSAs may be decreased. The increased cross linkage of acrylic resin functional groups was also found to increase a maximum value of lap shear stress. Accordingly, by increasing the cross linkage of acrylic resin functional groups, the adhesive was durable, fluid resistant, and did not leave a residue that might otherwise damage a floor surface or militate against removal of the intermediate adhesive layer 6 from the floor surface.
Custom 1 formula, shown in the TABLES 1-3, refers to the original LS92 formula with an increased coating weight (C/W). Custom 2 formula, shown in the tables below, refers to a modified adhesive formula that increased the cross linkage of the acrylic resin, while reducing the C/W. Custom 3 formula, shown in the TABLES 1-3, refers to a modified adhesive formula that increased the cross linkage of the acrylic resin, while increasing the C/W. The results of the trials were recorded according to the ASTM D3330 Method A procedure described hereinabove. The CAN of the adhesive was measured in grams per 1,000 square inches (g/msi) and the force of the adhesive was measured in pounds per square inch (psi).
The data collected and shown in TABLES 1-3 suggests a desirable adhesive strength ranging from about 300 psi to about 700 psi adhesive tested on stainless steel for 20 minutes at room temperature. A desirable adhesive strength for adhesive tested on vinyl for 20 minutes at room temperature was found to be between about 400 psi and about 750 psi. A desirable adhesive strength for adhesive tested on stainless steel for one week at room temperature was found to be between about 300 psi and about 550 psi. A desirable adhesive strength for adhesive tested on vinyl for one week at room temperature was found to be between about 350 psi and about 550 psi. A desirable adhesive strength for adhesive tested the one week at room temperature, and subsequently aged 72 hours at 150 degrees Fahrenheit, was found to be between about 300 psi and about 500 psi for both stainless steel and vinyl. It is believed that the recorded range of adhesive strength should be sufficient to adhere the absorbent mat 2 to the floor of a restroom, while not leaving an undesirable amount of residue upon removal, or otherwise damaging the floor when the absorbent mat 2 is removed after a period of use.
The preferred stiffness of the absorbent material in the absorbent layer 4 was determined using standardized test procedure ASTM D4032. The ASTM D4032 test procedure is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. In general, the ASTM D4032 procedure determines the stiffness of fabrics by a circular bend procedure. This test method is applicable to all types of fabrics, including woven, knitted and nonwoven fabrics of any fiber content. The test involves a plunger forcing a flat, folded swatch of fabric through an orifice in a testing platform. The maximum force required to push the fabric through the orifice is an indication of the fabric stiffness (resistance to bending).
The testing platform was a 102 mm by 102 mm by 6 mm (4 in. by 4 in. by ¼ in.) smooth-polished chrome-plated steel plate with a 38.1 mm (1.50 in.) diameter orifice. The lap edge of the orifice was at a 45° angle to a depth of 4.8 mm ( 3/16 in.). The plunger was 25.4-mm (1.00 in.) in diameter and was mounted concentric with the orifice having a 6.4 mm (0.25 in.) clearance on all sides. The bottom of the plunger was set at 3 mm (⅛ in.) above the top of the orifice plate. From this position, the downward stroke length was 57 mm (2.25 in.), and the Force-Measurement Gauge used was a dial or digital type.
The dial gauges had a maximum reading of different capacities ranging from 1 to 50 pound-force (lbf), 0.5 to 25 kilogram-force (kgf), or 5 to 200 newtons (N), with 100 graduations minimum. The digital gauge had a maximum reading “hold” feature and capacity of 100 lbf, 50 kgf, or 500 N, with 1,000 graduations minimum.
The roll of absorbent material to be tested was then removed from storage. A random number of rolls were used to test a lot sample. The first 1 m of absorbent material from the very outside of the rolls were discarded. The next 1 m of material, stretching from the end of each roll of absorbent material in the lot sample, was used for testing.
Using a specimen marking template, which marks a 102 mm by 204 mm (4.0 in. by 8.0 in.) area the lot sample, the swath of absorbent material in the lot sample was marked and cut from the lot sample. The short side of the lot sample was parallel to the machine (length) direction of the absorbent material. No lot samples were cut closer to the selvage than one tenth of the material width. A total of five test specimens were cut from staggered areas of each piece of absorbent material in the lot sample. Each specimen was laid face down and folded once to form a square of 102 mm by 102 mm (4 in. by 4 in.). After folding the specimen, the template was used to flatten the crease. Handling of specimens was kept to a minimum to avoid affecting stiffness properties. The adequately conditioned specimens were tested in the standard atmosphere for testing textiles, which is 21° C.+/−1° C. (70° F.+/−2° F.) and 65%+1-2% relative humidity.
A gauge was selected with a capacity in which results would fall within 15% to 100% of dial gauge force or 1.5% to 100% of the digital gauge force. The tester was set on a flat surface with the dial gauge at eye level. The tester plunger speed control was checked for a full stroke length.
The air pressure control to the actuator was set at 324 pascal (kPa) (47 psi). Using a stop-watch, the pneumatics were adjusted to provide a plunger speed of 1.7 s+/−0.15 s under no load conditions. A stop-watch was used to establish and confirm a plunger speed of 1.7 s+1-0.3 s. The specimen was centered on the orifice platform below the plunger. The gauge was checked to be at zero and was adjusted, if necessary. The maximum force reading switch was set.
Each folded specimen was placed over the orifice and the plunger was actuated for the full stroke length. The maximum force reading to nearest gauge graduation was recorded. Each individual specimen readings were averaged and rounded to the nearest gauge increment.
After performing the ASTM D4032 standardized test on the Magic Dragon™ (MD) 100-series nonwoven material of the absorbent layer 4, a stiffness value of between approximately 4.0 kgf and approximately 8.0 kgf was established. The Magic Dragon™ (MD) 100-series nonwoven material was also observed to have no or minimal visual creases remaining after testing. The stiffness value of the Magic Dragon™ (MD) 100-series nonwoven material is also comparatively lower than stiffness values of other known absorbent materials, which have been observed to exhibit visible creases or wrinkles upon folding and have stiffness values greater than 25.0 kgf. It is therefore believed that having a stiffness value of less than 25.0 kgf, and more preferably approximately 4.0 kgf to approximately 8.0 kgf, contributes to a minimization of crease or wrinkle formation after folding, and is therefore desirable. The absence of visible creases or wrinkles after folding is a desirable trait for the absorbent mat 2 of the present disclosure. In particular, the lack of a crease allows the absorbent mat 2 to be folded while shipped and stored, yet remain aesthetically pleasing when ready for use.
Advantageously, the absorbent mat 2 of the present disclosure is inexpensive, foldable, easy to install, and easy to remove. The absorbent mat 2 has also been found to exhibit minimal creasing or wrinkling after being folded, as described hereinabove.
While certain representative embodiments and details have been shown for purposes of illustrating the invention, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various changes may be made without departing from the scope of the disclosure, which is further described in the following appended claims.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/634,713, filed on Feb. 23, 2018. The entire disclosure of the above application is hereby incorporated herein by reference.
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 62634713 | Feb 2018 | US |