Typical prior art absorbers utilize what is described herein as a static, fixed surface area on which the absorption occurs. For example, a common absorber design is a “shaped packing” design. In this design, packing elements with complex surface shapes are placed in a fixed size chamber. A liquid solvent is typically caused to flow downwardly and wet the fixed size exterior surfaces of the elements. This provides a large surface area for mass transfer between the solvent and the gas. A gas is then driven upwardly through the packing, and a selected component of the gas is absorbed into the surface of the solvent. The surface area of the packing remains fixed and static. The three commercial types of packing are random, structured trays, and spray towers. The fixed and static surface area is a major limitation of the prior art.
Another common limitation of known absorbers is the relatively short amount of time in which the two fluids are in surface contact with each other. The prior art designs typically use a counter-flow arrangement wherein the solvent in the above specific shaped packing example flows downwardly and the gas flows upwardly. The counter-flow technique is utilized to maximize the concentration gradient between the two fluids but has the inherent limitation of minimizing the time in which the surfaces of the two fluids are in contact.
A further limitation of these conventional packings is the significant height of packing required to facilitate the absorption process. A further limitation of most prior art absorbers is that they require relatively expensive materials in their construction. The large surface area of these packings which is required to facilitate absorption also makes them susceptible to fouling where the surfaces can become fouled with dirt, impurities from the gas or liquid or precipitation products from the absorption itself.
The present invention overcomes all of the above limitations of the prior art.
The present invention not only overcomes the above limitations of the prior art; the applicants have identified the hydrodynamic phenomenon described below as “solvent pulsing.” This phenomenon significantly enhances absorption efficiency in the absorber described herein.
The present invention, in contrast to using the prior art static, fixed surface area, creates dynamic, rapidly changing, large surface area for a given volume. Solvent bubbles and droplets are intentionally caused to burst and are formed and shattered, at a rapid rate. The objective is to create the densest possible array of the smallest bubbles, droplets and micro-droplets and to repeatedly, rapidly and violently cause each of them to break up or fragment. The mass transfer surface is greatly increased and constantly refreshing, thereby maximizing the mass transfer (or absorption) within a given volume of an absorber reaction chamber. The contact environments range from an aqueous-froth column with a micro-froth matrix that is reformed at high frequency, to a transient froth that alternates at high frequency from a micro-froth matrix to a projectile spray fueled by bursting bubbles, to a shear-spray with isolated membrane rupture and impact fragmentation. Each of these dynamic mass transfer processes provide a high reactant surface area and a dramatic increase in absorption efficiency compared to conventional gas/liquid absorbers.
The present invention uses screens or venturis to fragment the solvent froth into a myriad of droplets which creates a very large surface area for mass transfer, which surface is made up of the solvent itself. But instead of leaving the small droplets intact in a confined space which would produce a relatively static, fixed surface area similar to prior art devices, the present invention continuously and violently fragments and reforms the droplets at a rapid rate. Bubbles also form which in turn are caused to burst, forming thousands of microscopic droplets from each bursting bubble, whereby the active surface area of the liquid solvent is further increased. This high frequency and continuous regeneration of the surface of the liquid solvent is a significant aspect of the invention. An enormous reaction surface is created in a small volume. The reaction surface is continuously and violently ruptured and reformed to maximize the efficiency of the mass transfer.
The present invention also differs significantly from the prior art in that it maximizes the time period of contact between gas and solvent by using a concurrent flow as opposed to a counter flow technique. By maximizing the time period of contact, we inherently maximize the efficiency of the absorption process. The time period of contact may be further extended by using multiple stages in the process.
The present invention, by continuously and rapidly regenerating the surface area of the solvent (in the example given) maintains a maximized concentration gradient across the entire surface of the solvent for the entire time period in which the gas and solvent are in contact with each other, all for the purposes of mass transfer. Any given droplet or bubble will interact with the gas across its entire surface momentarily, and then the bubbles burst, many droplets are fragmented into micro-droplets, some droplets coalesce and are then reformed as the liquid is forced through the screen. Each time this process is repeated the freshly formed surface provides new solvent surface area to interact with the gas with a maximized concentration gradient, since the surfaces of the bubbles, droplets, and micro-droplets do not remain intact long enough to become saturated with the component being removed or absorbed from the gas.
In addition to the above advantages, the applicants have identified the hydrodynamic phenomenon referred to herein as “solvent pulsing,” which substantially increases absorption efficiency. Although overall liquid-gas molar flow rate ratios are comparable to conventional contactors, solvent volumetric flow rate in the present absorber is not constant. Rather, solvent volumetric flow rate initially is low and a fraction of the solvent accumulates in the pulsing screens described herein. Upon reaching a critical saturation, a large fraction of the accumulated solvent travels downstream at high volumetric flow rate in a pulse. After the pulse, the solvent volumetric flow rate is low again until another pulse occurs. This repeats ad infinitum. This pulsing is beneficial because at flow rates and liquid-gas ratios similar to that of conventional columns the Reynolds number for the liquid places it squarely in the laminar regime. However, because the absorber experiences the pulsing phenomenon, it greatly increases the volumetric flow rate during a pulse bringing it more in line with turbulent flow. There exists numerous literature that show turbulent flow causes better mixing. Furthermore, high speed photography shows pulsing enhancing the formation of micro-froth. Literature also exists that show froth and bubble structures enhance contact area. The use of co-current flow and the geometry of the screens allow for these important solvent pulses to occur.
The present invention also differs significantly from the prior art in that less materials can be used to fabricate the absorber of the present invention.
The present invention also represents a significant improvement over existing absorber systems. An inherent limitation of such absorbers is the efficiency and physical size of the absorber. As the liquid stream trickles down through the packing any non-uniformity in the packing or maldistribution of the liquid onto the packing or the absorber itself not being perfectly level will cause channeling of the liquid. This channeling or maldistribution will reduce the effective surface area of the packing available for mass transfer thereby reducing the efficiency of the absorber. To prevent this, packing bed heights are limited to 5 to 10 m and require redistributors for the gas and liquid between packed sections.
The present invention includes a technique which eliminates “channeling” and also simultaneously increases the efficiency of absorbers and allows for the absorbers to be any shape. The present invention utilizes an array of tubes strategically placed in the reaction chamber; the tubes force the gas stream to divide itself into smaller, equally sized sub streams to flow through the array of tubes. This technique causes all portions of the gas and liquid streams to be equally distributed thus eliminating the problems of channeling or maldistribution associated with conventional absorbers and allowing for absorbers of significantly larger diameter than absorbers using conventional packing. These tubes can be round, square, polyhedral or almost any geometric shape.
A further embodiment of the technology involves using venturi tubes in lieu of screens or other techniques described above. In the case of venturi tubes as the gas passes through the throat of the venturi a pressure drop occurs. This low pressure area in the throat will sink solvent from the surrounding solvent reservoir. The speed of the gas passing through the venturi will cause the solvent to spray into the venturi. Further fragmenting or shattering of the liquid into droplets and micro-droplets may be induced by the placement of static blades or screens in the throat of the venturi. This will provide a surface area on which the liquid will impact and shatter or break up into droplets and micro-droplets. As the gas exits the venturi the velocity will decrease and some of the pressure drop will be recovered.
In yet another embodiment the tubes may be replaced altogether with continuous packs of corrugated and/or flat screens which fill the full diameter of the absorber vessel. These “packs” would be held in place by supporting rings and grids and solvent would be dispersed evenly onto the top of the packs using any one of a number of conventional liquid distributors.
The use of the above techniques together in combination provides, for the first time known to applicants a universal absorber that can be utilized with virtually any gas and liquid. The combined use of:
A primary object of the invention is to provide an absorber utilizing some or all of the features described in the preceding paragraph to improve absorption efficiency.
In an alternate embodiment an array of properly placed tubes is used in the reaction chamber to prevent channeling of plumes, increase overall efficiency and to allow the use of large, efficient froth reaction chambers (more than 15 meters in diameter for a cylindrical chamber).
A further object of the invention is to provide an absorber capable of use with large reaction chambers, but which eliminates channeling. Other objects will become apparent from the following description and drawings.
An incoming, flow gas stream 30 such as flue gas from a fossil fuel power plant, flows into inlet duct 31 connected to inlet port 33 at the top or upper end of vessel 20. Gas stream 30 contains a selected component, such as CO2, for example, in the case of a flue gas stream, to be absorbed. Incoming flowing gas stream 30 flows downwardly through reaction or absorption vessel 20, and after being subjected to the absorption process described herein, is discharged through outlet duct 32.
Reaction vessel 20 has a first chamber 25 and a second chamber 26 separated by bulkhead plate 21 extending horizontally across vertical reaction vessel 20. First chamber 25 is fluidly connected to gas inlet duct 31 to allow flow of pressurized gas stream 30 into first chamber 25. Bulkhead plate 21 extends across outlet end 25b of first chamber 25 to separate first chamber 25 from adjacent second chamber 26.
A plurality or array of discrete, vertically oriented absorption tubes 40 is carried in respective flow ports 40a formed through bulkhead plate 21. Each of the absorption tubes 40 extends through bulkhead plate 21 into first chamber 25 to define a respective conduit for the flow of gas stream 30 from first chamber 25 into second chamber 26. These tubes being of any one of a number of possible geometric shapes. The flow ports 40a and absorption tubes 40 are sized and positioned to equalize the flow speed of gas stream 30 downwardly through each absorption tube 40 from first chamber 25 into second chamber 26.
Fan 97 constitutes means for pressurizing gas stream 30 in first chamber 25 to cause a back pressure in chamber 25, which in turn causes gas stream 30 to flow at substantially the same, equal flow rates through each of the absorption tubes 40 into second chamber 26.
As shown in
An array of discrete, vertically oriented absorber tubes 40 are densely mounted to and carried in flow ports 40a in the bulkhead plates 21 and 23. The gas absorber tubes 40 are mounted perpendicular to the plates 21, 23 and parallel with the vertical axis of the vessel 20. The number of gas absorber tubes required on each stage is dependent of the gas and liquid flow. Each stage may include one tube or many thousands of tubes. Each of the absorption tubes 40 extends through bulkhead plate 21 to define a respective conduit for the flow of gas stream 30 from first chamber 25 into second chamber 26. The tubes 40 and ports 40a carrying tubes 40 are sized and positioned to equalize the flow speed of gas stream 30 downwardly through each tube from first chamber 25 to second chamber 26.
Lean liquid solvent is fed into the absorber above plate 21 by inlet lines 51 to flood the space above bulkhead plate 21 and between the tubes 40 forming a solvent reservoir 56. Liquid solvent 50 may be any solvent capable of absorbing the selected component, CO2, in the example given. Each tube 40 carries a screen assembly 60 described below. Solvent then is injected through holes and/or the slots 41 into each of the tubes 40 onto a screen assembly (or froth generator) 60 to mix with the gas stream 30 and establish froth droplets and bubbles (both not shown for clarity). Alternatively solvent may simply flow over the top of the absorber tubes negating the need for holes or slots. In these cases the top of the tubes may have notches (
Each tube is fitted with an array of screens as described later. These screens act to burst, shatter, fragment or break up the bubbles in the aqueous froth into a myriad of droplets and micro-droplets of different radii which creates a very large, rapidly changing solvent surface, as described in detail in U.S. Pat. No. 7,854,791, incorporated herein by reference. The screen assemblies shown in
The injection of solvent into each of the absorption tubes may be done by various techniques described herein, all of which will form an aqueous froth in each absorption tube, in a manner that the screen assemblies cause bubbles in the froth to burst, reform, and burst repeatedly to form numerous micro-droplets of different radii, thereby creating a rapidly changing surface area for absorption.
In some cases in order to deliver the leanest solvent to each stage the lean solvent may be fed directly to each stage (line 52). In this case there would be a separate lean solvent feed line to each stage and a separate dehydration stage below each absorber stage.
Where separation of the gas and liquid is required, multiple liquid/gas separators are mounted directly below the tubes. One possible form of these separators is shown, but others exist. The passageways through the liquid/gas separators establish fluid (gas) communication between the initial dewatering chamber 26 and a next absorber stage 27 of the absorber vessel. In this step the liquid falls and settles into the space between the separators and can then be drawn off as a continuous liquid stream through a rich solvent drain line 53 to be regenerated into lean solvent. The gas 30 in turn passes through the separator tubes and into the next absorber stage. The need to remove the liquid absorbent after each absorber stage is dependent on the requirements of each application.
In other cases all the lean solvent will enter the absorber via a single line at the top of the absorber and will pass through the multiple stages of the absorber to be removed at the bottom or absorber sump.
The gas and liquid leaving the tubes flows into the next stage in the absorber.
In applications where liquid absorbent removal is not required, the partially spent absorbent from the first stage will fall into the liquid-absorbent reservoir of the next stage, and in-turn enter the gas absorber tubes.
The final dehydration stage 28 includes a rich-solvent reservoir 29 in the bottom of the vessel 20. A horizontal gas outlet duct 32 projects through the vessel wall in the final dewatering chamber to allow the gas 30 to leave the absorber vessel 20.
Fresh or lean solvent 50 is delivered to the absorber through inlet line 51 and in the case of multiple inlets 52 and others.
Rich solvent 55 (the solvent already used to absorb components from the gas) exits through drain 57 at the bottom of vessel 20 and is directed to a solvent regeneration system which is not the subject of this patent application.
The solvent regeneration system uses heat and/or a vacuum to strip the component which has been removed from the gas stream from the solvent so that the regenerated solvent can in turn be reused in the absorber.
The screens (or meshes) and screen (or mesh) assemblies shown in
In yet another embodiment the tubes may be replaced altogether with continuous packs of corrugated and/or flat screens which fill the full diameter of the absorber vessel. These “packs” would be held in place by supporting rings and grids and solvent would be dispersed evenly on to the top of the packs using any one of a number of conventional liquid distributors. This embodiment is referred to as herein as the “Full Diameter Screen” embodiment, and is shown in
A horizontal-flow absorber 310 (HFA) illustrated in
Multiple gas absorber tubes 340 are densely mounted perpendicular to each bulkhead 321, 322 and parallel with the linear axis of the vessel 320, forming two gas absorber-tube plates 391, 392. Each absorber-tube plate 391, 392 forms an additional reaction chamber 325, 327, or stage, along the linear axis of the absorber vessel 320. The number of gas absorber tubes 340 required on each stage is dependent of the gas and liquid flow. Each stage may include one tube or many thousands of tubes. The absorber tubes establish fluid communication between the first reaction chamber 324 and the second or next sequential reaction chamber 325 along the linear axis of the absorber vessel.
Lean solvent is fed through inlet line 351 to the feed header for each stage of the absorber through lines 352, 353.
There are two potential horizontal arrangements represented by
This same pressurized arrangement can also be used for vertical absorbers.
A rich-solvent sump 395 is located immediately downstream of each stage. A rich solvent drain pipe 396 is connected to the sumps 395 for joining each stage. In the case where the absorber is operating at low pressure a rich-solvent pump (not shown) will be required to pump the rich solvent to the regeneration system (not illustrated). Where the absorber is operating at pressure the rich solvent will be able to flow under the absorber pressure to the regeneration system.
A mist eliminator 385 is located downstream from the final absorber-tube plate. The cross-sectional area of the mist eliminator is mounted perpendicular to the linear axis of the absorber vessel. Solvent drain ports are located in the bottom of the absorber vessel, directly below the mist eliminator. A mist eliminator sump 398 is mounted to the demister. This sump is connected to the rich-solvent drain pipe 396.
A second identical stage 492 is preferably utilized, identical to first stage 491.
Drains 495 carry rich solvent to drain line 496. A demister mesh 485 is mounted downstream of second stage 492. Rich solvent from demister 485 is collected in drain 498 and then into drain line 496.
Incoming flowing gas stream is pressurized by any conventional fan 1399 or other known device.
Reaction vessel 1320 carries a plurality of vertically spaced apart, ridge shaped screens 1360, wherein each screen extends transversely across said reaction vessel. The screens extend from sidewall 1321 to side wall 1322 and extend completely across the cross section of reaction vessel 1320. The screens are vertically spaced apart by spacers 1366. The screens are shown aligned for clarity, but are preferably offset in relation to each other.
A solvent injector 1355 mounted inside vessel 1320 near the top of the vessel distributes a liquid solvent 1350 that is fed in through inlet line 1351. As shown in
The liquid solvent 1350a flows downwardly through reaction vessel 1320 co-currently with gas stream 1330.
The interaction of the incoming gas stream 1330 with the liquid solvent 1350a and screens 1360 creates an aqueous bubbly froth being intermixed with numerous micro-droplets formed from causing bubbles in the froth to burst, as described generally above and described in detail in U.S. Pat. No. 7,854,791 and is not described here for the sake of brevity.
We have found that by utilizing “ridge shaped screens” of particular designs, together with certain flow rates of the incoming gas stream, we have identified a phenomenon described herein as “solvent pulsing.” This phenomenon is illustrated schematically and described below and is used in the absorbers shown in
FIGS. 11A-11F—are concept sketches, not to scale that illustrate the “solvent pulsing” phenomenon created in the upper portion 1321 illustrated in
The screens of the embodiments shown in
In the embodiment of
Square-wave shaped screens in the remainder of the reaction chamber have 14×14 openings/square inch, 0.046″ apertures, 0.025″ wire diameter, and 42% open area in order to propagate the pulses through the reaction chamber at lower pressure drop than pulse-generation screens and allow for optimal contact time between the gas and liquid phases.
Although overall liquid-gas molar flow rate ratios are comparable to conventional contactors, solvent volumetric flow rate in the absorber as described herein is not constant. Rather, solvent volumetric flow rate initially is low and a fraction of the solvent accumulates in the screens as described above. Upon reaching a critical saturation, a large fraction of the accumulated solvent travels downstream at high volumetric flow rate in a pulse. After the pulse, the solvent volumetric flow rate is low again until another pulse occurs. This repeats ad infinitum.
Screen specs for pulsing (
Openings/sq. in, wire diameter, opening size, open area ratio
16×16—0.023″—0.040″—40%
Pulse frequencies at 2.5 m/s Vgas:
Generation frequency—approximately 2/sec
Regeneration frequency—approximately 60/sec
This pulsing is beneficial because at flow rates and liquid-gas ratios similar to that of conventional columns the Reynolds number for the liquid places it squarely in the laminar regime. However, because the absorber experiences the pulsing phenomenon, it greatly increases the volumetric flow rate during a pulse bringing it more in line with turbulent flow. There exists numerous literature that show turbulent flow causes better mixing, which increases the rate of mass transfer. Furthermore, high speed photography shows pulsing enhancing the formation of micro-froth. Literature also exists that show froth and bubble structures enhance contact area. The use of co-current flow and the geometry of the screens allow for these important solvent pulses to occur.
Screen specs. For propagation (
14×14 openings/square inch, 0.025″ wire diameter, 0.046″ opening size, 42% open area ratio
Approximately (4) ridges/inch across the diameter of the screens: ⅛″ ridges and ⅛″ valleys
e.g.—4″ diameter screen has 16 ridges
Ridge height . . . 0.275″-0.375″
Screens separated by 0.25″ spacers
It is to be understood that
The applicants are not certain at this time how or why the “solvent pulsing” occurs.
As shown in
As shown in
Gas/liquid absorption is a very common chemical process for using a liquid absorbent to remove a component from a gas stream or vice versa. Absorbers are used in natural gas processing, oil refining, chemical and petrochemical industries, pharmaceuticals, fertilizers, etc. Applications include;
The absorbers shown and described herein can be used in all gas/liquid absorption applications.
Conventional absorbers use an absorbent solvent and packing to create surfaces through which mass transfer occurs. Liquid absorbent enters at the top of the absorber vessel and is distributed evenly across the full cross-sectional area of the packing using mechanical distributors. There are several types of packing, including random and structured. Random packing is made up from individual pressed metal, ceramic, or plastic shapes that are randomly dumped onto a support tray in the absorber creating a “packed bed”. Structured packing is corrugated segments of metal or plastic formed into a structure with intricate surface area, located inside the absorber.
Alternatively, absorbers may use trays or plates which force contact between the target gas and solvent. A trayed absorber uses perforated plates, bubble caps or a valve tray to allow the gas to bubble up through the liquid absorbent to facilitate mass transfer. Mass transfer occurs as the absorbent liquid, draining downward from the top, contacts the target gas, flowing upward from below, as the gas bubbles through the perforations. A third type of absorber is a “spray tower” where the liquid absorbent is sprayed downward to create small droplets, thereby creating surfaces for mass transfer. The solvent droplets fall downward as the gas flows upward through the tower.
Large diameter absorbers (15 m) for gas/liquid absorption have difficulty maintaining an even and consistent gas and liquid flows over the cross-sectional area of the absorber. This results in channeling of the gas flowing upward through the liquid absorbent flowing downward, which in turn, leads to poor mass transfer.
The gas passes down through the screens mixing with the liquid and in doing so shatters or ruptures the solvent into a myriad of droplets which create a very large surface area for mass transfer. But instead of leaving the small droplets intact in a confined space which would produce a relatively static, fixed surface area similar to prior art devices, the present invention continuously and violently ruptures or fragments and reforms the droplets at a rapid rate. Some bubbles also form which in turn are caused to burst forming thousands of microscopic droplets from each bursting bubble, whereby the active surface area of the liquid solvent is further increased. This high frequency and continuous regeneration of the surface of the liquid solvent is a significant aspect of the invention. An enormous reaction surface is created in a small volume. The reaction surface is continuously and violently ruptured and reformed to maximize the efficiency of the mass transfer.
The Absorber embodiment incorporates multiple gas absorber tubes in a modular design. The absorber tubes are optimized for consistent gas and liquid flow over the tube's cross-sectional area. The cross-sectional area of the absorber tubes can be cylindrical, square, rectangular, triangular or polyhedral. The exact shape is optimized for each application. The gas absorber tubes can be made out of metals, plastics, or ceramics to suit the process conditions. The individual gas absorber tubes are densely mounted onto, or through, horizontal bulkhead plates that divide the reaction chamber into vertical stages. A portion of the flow passes through each of the absorber tubes, maintaining consistent even flow over the cross-sectional area of the reaction chamber. This is just one feature of the design.
One application of the absorbers described herein is the removal of CO2 from a gas stream. In this application it is anticipated that precipitating solvents will be more economical than non-precipitating solvents for large scale CO2 capture, however in conventional packed-bed absorbers, the intricate structure and tortuous passageways through the random packing prevents the use of precipitating solvents.
In all embodiments, the liquid-to-gas contact surface area is increased via the creation of droplets and bubbles instead of an intricate mechanical structure. Droplets, bursting bubbles, and micro-droplets provide high liquid-to-gas surface area between the solvent and the target gas. Vortex tubes, detached eddies, and separated shear layers mix solvent with the target gas in the turbulent regime in-between the froth-generator plates. Micro-mixing of the droplet and bubble structures facilitates efficient absorption of the target gas.
When precipitating solvents are used, the absorbers of the invention operate without the precipitants blocking the absorber
The liquid-to-gas surface area is increased using screens or venturis to shatter or rupture the solvent into a myriad of droplets which create a very large surface area for mass transfer which is made up of the solvent itself. But instead of leaving the small droplets intact in a confined space which would produce a relatively static, fixed surface area similar to prior art devices, the present invention continuously and violently ruptures and reforms the droplets at a rapid rate. Bubbles also form which in turn are caused to burst forming thousands of microscopic droplets from each bursting bubble, whereby the active surface area of the liquid solvent is further increased. This high frequency and continuous regeneration of the surface of the liquid solvent is a significant aspect of the invention. An enormous reaction surface is created in a small volume. The reaction surface is continuously and violently ruptured and reformed to maximize the efficiency of the mass transfer. The huge surface area provided by these droplets and bubbles for mass transfer, combined with its unstable nature means that droplets and bubbles are reformed before mass transfer equilibrium is reached.
In other words, concentration of the component absorbed into solvent is still low when the droplets are reformed. Thus the concentration gradient, i.e. the difference between the concentrations of the target component in the gas, compared to the solvent, is still high. The dynamic reaction surface area is then reformed with lean solvent (i.e. solvent with a lower concentration of the absorbed component), thereby creating a high concentration gradient between the target gas and the solvent. The high concentration gradient maximizes the driving force for mass transfer.
The reactant surfaces are reformed at frequent intervals. Rich solvent is replaced with leaner solvent flowing down the tube. The reactant surfaces are reformed and replaced each time the flow passes through one of the screens.
The absorbers can be designed to operate within the parameters required for optimal gas absorption of a variety of commercial and generic, precipitating and non-precipitating absorbent solvents which have a range of viscosities, surface tensions, and specific gravities.
Individual gas absorber tubes are densely packed into each stage of the FTGA embodiment. The stages are flooded with solvent to a predetermined level above the multiple solvent injection ports in the gas absorber tubes or to the top of the tubes themselves such that solvent is introduced at a predetermined rate into the gas absorber tubes in each absorber stage.
Screens may be used in combination with solvent distribution plates. These plates serve to assist in redistributing the solvent and gas as they pass down the tubes.
The flow of mixed gases and solvent passes through screening plates, located at frequent intervals in each froth generator assembly, in order to reform the reactant surfaces of the droplets, bubbles, and micro-droplets. Rich solvent from the reactant surfaces is replaced with leaner solvent from fluid structures in the flow field. These droplets, bubbles and micro-droplets provide a high liquid-to-gas contact-area between the solvents and the target gas.
The liquid/gas separators remove a portion of the rich solvent from the flow. Lean solvent introduced in the next absorber stage replaces the portion of rich solvent removed by the liquid/gas separators.
In order to be able use a variety of commercial and generic solvents which all have a range of viscosities, surface tensions, and specific gravities, the absorber can be designed to operate within the parameters required for optimal gas absorption of specific solvents.
The size and number of the FTGA tubes, the mesh size of the screens and open-area ratio of the screens are selected in order to balance pressure drop with efficiency.
The distance between a screens and distributor plates is balanced with gas velocity and pressure drop to optimize system performance and removal of the target impurity from the gas stream.
Similarly distance between screens is also balanced with the rate-of-reaction to provide more or less time and distance for turbulent structures to form and reactant surfaces to absorb the target gas at high reaction rates.
It is believed that the following happens in the absorbers described above: In a packed bed, diffusive flow over random or structured packing consists of a boundary layer wetting surface of packing, an intermediate flow regime, and a free surface flow exposed to gas. As layers of fluid molecules flow over other layers of fluid molecules and turbulence occurs in flow between solid surfaces moderate mixing occurs between the surface layer and the intermediate layer, but little mixing occurs between the intermediate layer and the boundary layer. Molecular attraction of solid molecules is stronger than attraction of fluid molecules so boundary layer remains relatively static. As reactant in free surface layer is exposed to target gas, reaction rate is limited to regeneration of fresh reactant surfaces exposed by moderate mixing between intermediate layer and free surface layer that is driven by turbulence and diffusive flow dynamics.
In a spray tower, currents in the free surface of falling droplets caused by friction between the gas molecules and fluid molecules and, to a lesser extent, the Marangoni effect drive mixing between the free surface layer molecules that have reacted with the target gas and fresh reactant from inside the droplet.
The foregoing description of the invention has been presented for purposes of illustration and description and is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise form disclosed. Modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teaching. The embodiments were chosen and described to best explain the principles of the invention and its practical application to thereby enable others skilled in the art to best use the invention in various embodiments suited to the particular use contemplated.
This application claims the benefit of and priority from U.S. provisional application Ser. No. 61/463,194 filed on Feb. 14, 2011 and from U.S. provisional application Ser. No. 61/626,493 filed Sep. 27, 2011.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61463194 | Feb 2011 | US | |
61626493 | Sep 2011 | US |