The ability to optically measure quantities such as electric field, magnetic field, temperature, and strain under ambient conditions makes nitrogen vacancy (NV) centers in diamond appealing for a range of wide-field sensing applications, from imaging biological systems and electrical activity in integrated circuits to studying quantum magnetism and superconductivity in quantum materials. NV-based magnetometers have shown exceptional sensitivity at room temperature, but conventional fluorescence-based readout methods result in sensitivity values far from the spin projection noise limit primarily due to background fluorescence, poor photon collection efficiency, and low spin-state contrast. These limitations can be overcome by probing the infrared singlet transition near 1042 nm by absorption. However, this absorption-based readout has only been demonstrated for bulk diamond samples with a large optical path length of millimeters to centimeters due to the small absorption cross section of the singlet state transition. This long-pathlength requirement presents the central challenge in infrared (IR) readout to imaging microscopy, where the sensing depth should commonly be below the micron-scale.
A periodic structure, such as a plasmonic quantum sensing metasurface (PQSM), enhances IR absorption in NVs by confining vertically incident IR probe light in a micron-thick NV layer in a diamond host with a quality factor of about 100 to about 9000 (e.g., 100, 300, 400, 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000, 5000, 6000, 7000, 8000, or 9000). In one embodiment, the PQSM includes a metallodielectric grating that couples plasmonic surface lattice excitations with Bragg modes caused by the Rayleigh-Wood anomaly (RWA). The periodic arrangement of the plasmonic resonators embedded in or disposed on a diamond host concentrates the local field within the NV layer and provides wavelength-scale field enhancement. Unlike fluorescence, which is emitted isotropically, the directional reflection (or transmission) of a probe beam by the NVs can be captured with near-unity efficiency. In particular, detection of the reflected coherent probe light with a standard camera enables shot-noise limited detection, eliminating the need for single-photon detectors. Taken together, a PQSM or other periodic structure coupled to an NV sensing layer can enable a sensitivity below 1 nT Hz−1/2 per μm2 of sensing area.
An absorption-based diamond spin microscopy system may include a solid-state host (e.g., diamond) with a sensing layer containing spin defect centers (e.g., NVs), an infrared (IR) light source, a periodic structure, and a detector. The spin defect centers have absorption resonances that change in response to an electric field, a magnetic field, a temperature, a stress, and/or a strain. In operation, the IR light source illuminates the spin defect centers with an IR optical field (e.g., at a wavelength of 1042 nm). The periodic structure, which is disposed on or embedded in the sensing layer, enhances the IR optical field in the sensing layer. And the detector, which is in optical communication with the solid-state host via the periodic structure, senses absorption of the IR optical field by at least some of the spin defect centers.
The periodic structure can have a quality factor of about 100 to about 10,000. It can include a metallodielectric grating with a period or grating pitch equal to a wavelength of the IR optical field divided by a refractive index of the solid-state host. Running a current through this metallodielectric grating applies a bias magnetic field to the layer of spin defect centers.
The absorption by the spin defect centers can vary in response to the magnetic field, in which case the system can detect variations in the magnetic field with a sensitivity of below nT/Hz1/2 per μm2. The detector may sense the absorption of the IR optical field by measuring a portion of the IR probe beam diffracted from the periodic structure at a Bragg angle of the periodic structure. For example, the detector may perform homodyne measurement of the portion of the IR probe beam diffracted from the periodic structure.
The system may also include a pump light source, in optical communication with the solid-state host, that illuminates the spin defect centers in the layer of spin defect centers with a (visible) pump beam. This pump beam excites the spin defect centers to an excited state. In this case, the periodic structure can be patterned to concentrate the pump beam in the sensing layer.
A system for sensing a magnetic field may include a solid-state host, spin defect centers disposed within one millimeter of a surface of the solid-state host, an IR light source, a metallodielectric grating embedded in the surface of the solid-state host, and a detector. The spin defect centers have absorption resonances that shift in response to the magnetic field. The IR illuminates the spin defect centers with IR optical radiation. The metallodielectric grating, which has a period based on a wavelength of the IR optical radiation and a refractive index of the solid-state host at the wavelength of the IR optical radiation, applies a bias magnetic field to the spin defect centers. It also enhances absorption of the IR optical radiation by the spin defect centers. And the detector, which is in optical communication with the spin defect centers via the metallodielectric grating, senses the absorption of the optical radiation by the spin defect centers.
The metallodielectric grating can support a hybrid plasmonic surface lattice resonance-Rayleigh-Wood anomaly mode that concentrates the infrared optical radiation within one millimeter of the surface of the solid-state host. The metallodielectric grating can have a quality factor of 100 to 1000. And the detector can acquire a phase-sensitive homodyne image of the spin defect centers.
All combinations of the foregoing concepts and additional concepts discussed in greater detail below (provided such concepts are not mutually inconsistent) are part of the inventive subject matter disclosed herein. In particular, all combinations of claimed subject matter appearing at the end of this disclosure are part of the inventive subject matter disclosed herein. The terminology used herein that also may appear in any disclosure incorporated by reference should be accorded a meaning most consistent with the particular concepts disclosed herein.
The skilled artisan will understand that the drawings primarily are for illustrative purposes and are not intended to limit the scope of the inventive subject matter described herein. The drawings are not necessarily to scale; in some instances, various aspects of the inventive subject matter disclosed herein may be shown exaggerated or enlarged in the drawings to facilitate an understanding of different features. In the drawings, like reference characters generally refer to like features (e.g., elements that are functionally and/or structurally similar).
A diamond quantum sensing surface with a periodic structure, such as an array of plasmonic nanostructures, can sense magnetic fields with a sub-nT Hz−1/2 per square micron of sensing surface. With an array of plasmonic nanostructures, also called a plasmonic quantum sensing metasurface (PQSM), this exceptional performance is achieved by a hybrid surface plasmon lattice excitation-Rayleigh-Wood anomaly (RWA) resonance that concentrates or enhances the electric field within a micron-scale layer of spin defect centers. The plasmonic structures of this PQSM can also provide microwave control: if the plasmonic structures are conductive (e.g., if they include metal wires), running a current through them generates a homogeneous magnetic field across a large sensing area. Combined with a homodyne detection, the PQSM makes a new type of quantum microscope that enables high-speed imaging measurements at the photon shot noise limit.
Periodic structures made of lossless materials are particularly advantageous as they can mitigate substantial Ohmic losses and subsequent heating effects encountered in plasmonic metamaterials. A dielectric periodic structure can alleviate issues encountered by spin defect centers near metallic materials (e.g., tunneling, quenching for fluorescence-based method, and NV charge state fluctuations). The optical field enhancement created by the periodic structure defines the layer of spin defect centers that measure the magnetic field, electric field, temperature, strain, stress, or other parameter. Also, the large field intensity enhancement enables the use of more stable spin defect centers that are embedded in the solid-state host far from the surface (near-surface spin defect centers tend to have shorter coherence time due to surface charges, etc.). Despite the increased source-to-sensor stand-off distance due to the periodic structure, the resonant field intensity enhancement is large enough that the sensitivity can be as good as or better than that of the near-surface spin defect centers.
By using periodic structures made of phase changing/tunable dielectric materials, such as GST or GSST, the enhancement of the resonant optical field maybe be tuned. Heating and/or cooling these materials, e.g., with intense pulses of infrared light or with integrated heaters, causes them to undergo phase changes that increase or decrease their refractive indices. Tuning the refractive index of the periodic structures varies the depth of the field enhancement, e.g., from tens of nanometers to several microns. It can also switch the field enhancement on or off if the effective refractive index of the periodic structure can be tuned to match the refractive index of the solid-state host or a surrounding cap layer.
Other applications include measuring the secondary magnetic field of eddy currents induced in conductive materials, such as batteries or computer chips, under an applied primary magnetic field. Amplitude and phase changes in the measured secondary magnetic field can provide information about cracks/flaws in the materials or on-going activities of computer chips. The large sensitivity improvement provided by the periodic structure 110 may enable non-destructive sensing/measurement of encapsulated devices (i.e., can tolerate stand-off distances). And for small quantities of chemicals, the sensor can perform spatially resolving chemical shift NMR measurements, with the periodic structure replacing the large coil used in conventional NMR spectroscopy.
IR-Absorption-Based Magnetic Field Detection with a Quantum Sensing System
In this example, the spin defect centers 124 are NVs in a diamond host 120. Other suitable spin defect centers include group IV emitters, such as silicon vacancies (SiV), germanium vacancies (GeV), tin vacancies (SnV), and lead vacancies (PbV). The density of the spin defect centers 124 in the solid-state host 120 can vary from 1 ppb to 100 ppm, depending on the desired sensitivity, which scales as the square root of the number of spin defect centers 124, and coherence time, which decreases at higher densities.
The inset of
The periodic structure 110 in
The PQSM 110 enhances or concentrates the field sensed by the quantum sensing system 100 in a sensing layer 122 of the diamond 120. This sensing layer 122 has a thickness that can range from tens of nanometers to a few millimeters (e.g., 10 nm, 100 nm, 1 μm, 10 μm, 100 μm, 1 mm, 10 mm, or any value between any of these values). It is directly below the PQSM 110. Put differently, the PQSM 110 is formed directly on or at a surface of the diamond 120, and the sensing layer 122 extends a depth, dNV from that surface into the diamond 120. The PQSM 110 could also be fabricated in or on a diamond membrane that is on the sample, which in turn is on a diamond slab. In some cases, the sensing layer 122 can extend through the entire thickness of the diamond 120 (i.e., the diamond 120 may be very thin). The diamond 120 can also be thicker than the sensing layer 122 as shown in
The silver wires 112 in the PQSM 110 can double as a wire array for NV microwave control: with a subwavelength spacing, running a current through the array of silver wires 112 produces a homogeneous transverse magnetic field, {right arrow over (B)}, as shown in
The quantum sensing system 100 also includes a pump laser 130 that illuminates the spin-defect centers 124 within a sensing area 101 of the sensing layer 122 with a pump beam 131 at a wavelength λt=532 nm and an intensity of It for NV spin initialization. This pump beam 131 hits the back side of the PQSM 110 through the diamond 120 but could also illuminate the diamond 120 from the side(s) or through the PQSM 110.
A probe laser 140 illuminates the spin-defect centers 124 in the sensing area 101 of the sensing layer 122 with a transverse magnetic (TM) polarized probe beam 141 a wavelength λs=1042 nm and an intensity of Is for IR readout. This probe beam 141 illuminates the spin defect centers 124 in the sensing layer 122 via the back side of the PQSM 110 and diamond 120 at an angle θi but could shine through the PQSM 110 in addition or instead. The PQSM 110 localizes and intensifies the infrared optical field provided by the probe beam 141 near the surface of the diamond 120 (i.e., the surface with the PQSM 110) as shown in
(The periodic structure 110 can also be patterned to confine or concentrate the pump beam 131 in the sensing layer 122. If the surface normal is in the z direction, for example, the periodic structure 110 can have a period or pitch in the x direction equal to the pump beam wavelength divided by the refractive index of solid-state host 120 at the pump beam wavelength and a period or pitch in the y direction equal to the probe beam wavelength divided by the refractive index of solid-state host 120 at the probe beam wavelength. In this example, the pump beam 131 illuminates the sensing area 101 at an angle in the x-z plane, and the probe beam 141 illuminates the sensing area 101 at an angle in the y-z plane. The periodic structure 110 could also be patterned in a more sophisticated fashion, for example, as a two-dimensional photonic crystal, that is resonant at both the pump and probe beam wavelengths.)
The PQSM-NV signal, which varies with the external magnetic field experienced by the spin defect centers 124, is manifested as spin-dependent phase and amplitude changes in the reflection 143 of the probe beam 141 by the spin defect centers 124 in the sensing layer 122. The reflected beam 143 is diffracted at the Bragg angle from the periodic structure 110 (in
Unlike in fluorescence measurements, in this absorption-based measurement scheme, the spatially well-defined signal beam 143 ensures a near-unity collection efficiency. The collected signal beam 143 is interfered with a local oscillator beam 145 having an amplitude ELO using a beam splitter 150. (The local oscillator beam 145 can be generated be the same laser 140 that generates the probe beam 141.) A lens 152 focusing the interfering signal beam 143 and local oscillator beam 145 onto a detector array, such as a CCD camera 160, which performs a phase-sensitive homodyne measurement. The interfered light intensity, Iout, detected by the CCD camera 60 is given by:
where R is the power splitting ratio of the beam splitter, r(It,ΩR) is the complex reflection coefficient of the PQSM, and ΔϕLO is the relative phase difference between ELO and Esig when It=0. A combination of R and ΔϕLO is chosen to maximize the signal-to-noise (SNR).
Alternative Periodic Structures
The periodic structure 210 and layer 204 in
The embedded periodic structure 310a provides a better field overlap with the diamond 320a as well as a larger field intensity enhancement. The capping layer 304a, 304b should be thick enough to ensure a maximum field intensity enhancement factor near 104 (the quality factors of periodic structures 310a and 310b are 8150 and 8000, respectively). At the same time, the capping layers 304a, 304b should be thin enough for the analyte to produce a measurable change in the magnetic field sensed by the NV centers in the diamond 320a, 320b. TM probe fields penetrate deeper into the diamond layer, which is more suitable for sensing. The quality factor and the spatially averaged field intensity increase with fill factor. The average refractive index, ng, of each periodic structure can be modulated or engineered with other materials selections.
Generally, a larger field overlap with the diamond sensing layer ensures a higher sensitivity. However, the high quality factor of the GMR mode relies on a large array of periodic structures, and as a result, the resulting spatial resolution is coarser than that can be achieved with cavities. This issue can be circumvented by, for example, placing a mirror on the phase acquired by the wave travelling the distance between two mirrors is m×2π; in this case, a set of mirrors is making the structure effectively an infinite array. Even one period is sufficient to maintain the quality factor and field intensity enhancement obtained assuming an infinitely periodic array. The transverse dimension of each pixel of the proposed imaging surface can be at the nanoscale. Other approaches are to spatially resolve the magnetic field changes by (1) sweeping the incidence angle of the excitation (pump beam), e.g., using resonance splitting with off-normal incidence, or (2) periodicity modulation within a pixel.
Slow Light Waveguide Sensing Structures
Periodic Structure Design
The resonant metasurface structure should increase or maximize the IR signal of the spin ensemble sensors (the NVs or other spin defect centers). Other implementations of IR absorption readout use bulk diamond samples with long optical path lengths because the intrinsic absorption cross sectional area of an NV is about an order of magnitude smaller than that of the triplet state transition for an NV. The resonant metasurface structure enhances this weak light-matter interaction by modifying the local electromagnetic environment of quantum emitters as follows.
The rate of absorption of a quantum emitter under an oscillating electromagnetic field with frequency, ωs, can be expressed following Fermi's golden rule.
where {right arrow over (μ)}=e·{right arrow over (r)} is the transition dipole moment operator, {right arrow over (E)} is the electric fields, and ρ(w)=(1/π){(γ*/2)/[(ω−ωs)2+(γ*/2)2]} is the electronic density of states, which is modeled as a continuum of final states with a Lorentzian distribution centered at ωs with linewidth γ*. For a given angle, β, between the emitter's transition dipole orientation, {right arrow over (μ)}, and the electric field, {right arrow over (E)}, created by a resonant metasurface structure, Eq. (1) can be expressed in terms of the spontaneous emission rate of the singlet state transition, γ=(ω03|5|{right arrow over (μ)}|6|2)/(3πϵc3):
where ϵ is the relative permittivity of the diamond or other solid-state host. The equation suggests that the rate of transition enhancement originates from the electric field intensity enhancement at the position of a spin defect center, color center, or other quantum sensor, assuming the properties of the spin defect center remain unperturbed. Contributions of all four orientations of NV emitters are averaged to determine the signal of the PQSM containing an ensemble of emitters.
To guide resonant metasurface structure optimization, consider a figure of merit (FOM) maximizing the spin-dependent absorption signal for a given sensing volume of Vpixel=L2×dNV, where L2 is the area of a pixel and dNV is the thickness of the sensing layer with a uniform spin-density defect center density of nNV. In the shot noise limit, the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the pixelated plasmonic imaging surface is given by:
where N0 and N1 are the average numbers of photons detected from the ms=0 and ms=±1 states, respectively, of the spin defect center per measurement, Δtmea is the total readout time, and I(0/ΩR)=Iout(It,0/ΩR,R,ΔϕLO). Here, |r(It,ΩR)| is defined as |α0−αNV(It,ΩR)|, where |α0|2 is the intrinsic reflection of the PQSM and |αNV(It,ΩR)|2=ANV is the NV absorption. For |α0|2>>|αNV(It,ΩR)|2, the SNR scales with |αNV(It,ΩR)|−|αNV(It,0)|; equivalently, it scales with the FOM, √{square root over (|E/E0|2VpixelnNV)}, where |E/E0|2=∫pixel|E/E0|2dV/∫pixeldV is the spatially averaged optical field enhancement over E0, which is the single-pass field without the resonant metasurface structure. The detailed derivation for this FOM is given below.
Localized surface plasmon (LSP) resonances can focus light intensity at subwavelength scales and have been used to increase spontaneous emission rates of single emitters or ensembles of emitters confined in a nanometer-scale volume. However, this field concentration comes with the trade-off of reducing the number of NV centers, NNV, that are coupled to the optical field. In addition, concentrating an electromagnetic field near a metallic material leads to losses due to Ohmic damping and dephasing.
The PQSM 110 in
where c is the speed of light in vacuum, n is the refractive index of diamond, kx=k0 sin(θi) is the momentum component of free-space light in the direction of grating period, m denotes the diffraction order, and |G| is given by 2π/p. Eq. (2) indicates that an incoming far-field radiation with momentum, k0, gains momentum by integer multiples of |G| and can satisfy momentum matching conditions to couple with the grating mode. When the Bragg scattering condition is met, the incident electromagnetic wave diffracts parallel to the PQSM surface and creates a field profile that extends away from the PQSM surface, providing a sufficient field overlap with the sensing (NV) layer.
Metal-Diamond Metallodielectric Periodic Structures
The large field concentration near the PQSM surface occurs when the RWA is coupled with a periodic array of plasmonic structures that support a so-called surface lattice resonance (SLR). The RWA mode alone is independent of the material properties of the embedded nanostructure (Eq. (2)). However, as the mode shown in
Without changing the geometric parameters of the PQSM, it is possible to couple in the green laser excitation for populating the singlet state by inducing a grating resonance at 532 nm via an off-normal incidence (i.e., compensating for the momentum mismatch, kx).
Spin-Dependent Response
The local density of each sublevel, n|i, can be calculated based on the following coupled rate equations under the assumption of spin-conserving optical transitions and a number conservation constraint (i.e., =nNV, where nNV is the total NV density):
Here, kij is the transition rate constant from state |i to state |j. ΓNV
The spin-dependent IR absorption, |αNV(It,ΩR)|2, can be obtained from the net population of the ground singlet state calculated from the coupled rate equations given above. The calculations here are based on the properties of a 1-μm thick NV layer with a spin defect center density of 2 ppm. For a [100] diamond plane, all four orientations of NVs should have equal contributions for the given SLR-induced field profile.
The SLR-RWA resonant field intensity enhancement also modifies the radiative decay rate by γrad→Fpγrad+γquenching, where Fp is the Purcell factor. However, the probability that absorbed IR photons will be re-emitted is negligible for at least two reasons. First, the singlet state transition shows a low intrinsic quantum efficiency, γrad/Γ, near 0.1%. Second, the quality factor of NVs' singlet state transition at room temperature is orders of magnitude smaller than that of the PQSM.
Optimizing Homodyne Detection
The SNR for homodyne and direct detection can be increased by biasing the local oscillator, e.g., to achieve unity spin contrast. Homodyne detection is particularly advantageous for fast imaging on focal plane arrays. Under confocal scanning, for example, a focal plane array could be integrated into an integrated photonics layer or programmable photonic unitaries; this would also enable basis transformations for compressive sampling and super-resolution imaging. Furthermore, coherent detection also enables quantum enhanced imaging schemes such as “interaction-free” imaging, imaging with undetected photons, or loss-tolerant quantum absorption measurements.
The optimal operating conditions for homodyne detection occur for combinations of R and ΔϕLO that maximize SNR/√{square root over (L2)}. These conditions can be found numerically for given Is and It.
Under the assumption of strong local oscillator (R→1), the SNR can be approximated as follows:
where C=√{square root over (ΔtmeaL2/ω0)} and I(0/ΩR)=Iout(It,0/ΩR, R, ΔϕLO). For comparison with direct detection, the SNR under the assumption of |αNV|2<<|α0|2 can be approximated as follows:
DC Sensitivity
The shot-noise-limited sensitivity of a CW-ODMR-based magnetometer per root area based on IR absorption measurement is given by:
where g≈2.003 is the g-factor of of the electron of the NV center, μB is the Bohr magneton, and ΓMW is the magnetic-resonance linewidth which can be approximated as ΓMS=2/T2*, assuming no power broadening from pump or microwaves. The sensitivity is normalized by an arbitrary pixel area, L2, and is reported for a given an NV layer thickness of dNV=1 m and an NV density of 2 ppm. The remaining experimental parameters are listed in Table 1. An alternative magnetometry method to CW-ODMR, such as pulsed ODMR or Ramsey sequences, can be exploited to achieve T2*-limited performance. It is useful to compare the photon-shot-noise-limited sensitivity with the spin-projection-noise-limited sensitivity of an ensemble magnetometer consisting of non-interacting spins.
where τ is the free precession time per measurement.
AC Sensitivity
Sources of NV spin dephasing can be largely eliminated with coherent control techniques such as the Hahn echo sequence. With an added π-pulse halfway through the interrogation time, a net phase accumulated due to a static or slowly varying magnetic field cancels out, and the interrogation time can be extended to a value of ˜T2. Thus, the AC sensitivity can be improved by a factor of approximately √{square root over (T2*/T2)} at the cost of a reduced bandwidth and insensitivity to magnetic field with an oscillating period longer than T2. For a given NV density of ˜2 ppm, T2 is about an order of magnitude longer than T2*. The sensitivity per root area for an ensemble-based AC magnetometer is given by:
where T2 is the characteristic dephasing time, tI is the initialization time, Δtmea is the readout time, and σR is the readout fidelity.
The time-dependent population evolution shown in
An additional shot noise introduced by the optical readout is quantified with the parameter σR, which is equivalent to an inverse of readout fidelity:
where a and b are the average numbers of photons detected from the ms=0 and ms=±1 states per spin per measurement, respectively. As shown in
SNR of the PQSM
The intrinsic rate of absorption can be written in terms of the intrinsic absorption cross section of the singlet state transition, σs, as:
The PQSM disclosed here enhances the rate of absorption of a spin defect center (e.g., an NV) at the position (x, y, z) by a factor of |E(x, y)/E0|2, where E0 is the electric field in a homogeneous environment and E (x, y) is the electric field induced by the LSP-RWA hybrid mode of the PQSM, invariant in z-direction. Define |αNV(ΩR)|2 as NV absorption as follows:
where NNV(It, ΩR) no is the total net NV population in the ground singlet state for a given Vpixel=dNVL2, which is given by (−)Vpixel. The net population of the singlet ground state (i.e., −) is used to account for stimulated emission. The SNR is therefore
where
is the intrinsic reflection of the metasurface without NV contributions. For |α0|2>>|αNV(ΩR)|2, the SNR is proportional to |αNV(ΩR)|−|αNV(0)|.
The performance of an ensemble-based sensor scales with √{square root over (|E/E0|2Vpixel)}.
Optimal Readout Condition for Pulsed Measurements
As shown in
There exists an optimal readout time that gives the maximum time-averaged signal-to-noise ratio.
Conclusion
While various inventive embodiments have been described and illustrated herein, those of ordinary skill in the art will readily envision a variety of other means and/or structures for performing the function and/or obtaining the results and/or one or more of the advantages described herein, and each of such variations and/or modifications is deemed to be within the scope of the inventive embodiments described herein. More generally, those skilled in the art will readily appreciate that all parameters, dimensions, materials, and configurations described herein are meant to be exemplary and that the actual parameters, dimensions, materials, and/or configurations will depend upon the specific application or applications for which the inventive teachings is/are used. Those skilled in the art will recognize or be able to ascertain, using no more than routine experimentation, many equivalents to the specific inventive embodiments described herein. It is, therefore, to be understood that the foregoing embodiments are presented by way of example only and that, within the scope of the appended claims and equivalents thereto, inventive embodiments may be practiced otherwise than as specifically described and claimed. Inventive embodiments of the present disclosure are directed to each individual feature, system, article, material, kit, and/or method described herein. In addition, any combination of two or more such features, systems, articles, materials, kits, and/or methods, if such features, systems, articles, materials, kits, and/or methods are not mutually inconsistent, is included within the inventive scope of the present disclosure.
Also, various inventive concepts may be embodied as one or more methods, of which an example has been provided. The acts performed as part of the method may be ordered in any suitable way. Accordingly, embodiments may be constructed in which acts are performed in an order different than illustrated, which may include performing some acts simultaneously, even though shown as sequential acts in illustrative embodiments.
All definitions, as defined and used herein, should be understood to control over dictionary definitions, definitions in documents incorporated by reference, and/or ordinary meanings of the defined terms.
The indefinite articles “a” and “an,” as used herein in the specification and in the claims, unless clearly indicated to the contrary, should be understood to mean “at least one.”
The phrase “and/or,” as used herein in the specification and in the claims, should be understood to mean “either or both” of the elements so conjoined, i.e., elements that are conjunctively present in some cases and disjunctively present in other cases. Multiple elements listed with “and/or” should be construed in the same fashion, i.e., “one or more” of the elements so conjoined. Other elements may optionally be present other than the elements specifically identified by the “and/or” clause, whether related or unrelated to those elements specifically identified. Thus, as a non-limiting example, a reference to “A and/or B”, when used in conjunction with open-ended language such as “comprising” can refer, in one embodiment, to A only (optionally including elements other than B); in another embodiment, to B only (optionally including elements other than A); in yet another embodiment, to both A and B (optionally including other elements); etc.
As used herein in the specification and in the claims, “or” should be understood to have the same meaning as “and/or” as defined above. For example, when separating items in a list, “or” or “and/or” shall be interpreted as being inclusive, i.e., the inclusion of at least one, but also including more than one, of a number or list of elements, and, optionally, additional unlisted items. Only terms clearly indicated to the contrary, such as “only one of” or “exactly one of,” or, when used in the claims, “consisting of,” will refer to the inclusion of exactly one element of a number or list of elements. In general, the term “or” as used herein shall only be interpreted as indicating exclusive alternatives (i.e., “one or the other but not both”) when preceded by terms of exclusivity, such as “either,” “one of” “only one of” or “exactly one of.” “Consisting essentially of,” when used in the claims, shall have its ordinary meaning as used in the field of patent law.
As used herein in the specification and in the claims, the phrase “at least one,” in reference to a list of one or more elements, should be understood to mean at least one element selected from any one or more of the elements in the list of elements, but not necessarily including at least one of each and every element specifically listed within the list of elements and not excluding any combinations of elements in the list of elements. This definition also allows that elements may optionally be present other than the elements specifically identified within the list of elements to which the phrase “at least one” refers, whether related or unrelated to those elements specifically identified. Thus, as a non-limiting example, “at least one of A and B” (or, equivalently, “at least one of A or B,” or, equivalently “at least one of A and/or B”) can refer, in one embodiment, to at least one, optionally including more than one, A, with no B present (and optionally including elements other than B); in another embodiment, to at least one, optionally including more than one, B, with no A present (and optionally including elements other than A); in yet another embodiment, to at least one, optionally including more than one, A, and at least one, optionally including more than one, B (and optionally including other elements); etc.
In the claims, as well as in the specification above, all transitional phrases such as “comprising,” “including,” “carrying,” “having,” “containing,” “involving,” “holding,” “composed of,” and the like are to be understood to be open-ended, i.e., to mean including but not limited to. Only the transitional phrases “consisting of” and “consisting essentially of” shall be closed or semi-closed transitional phrases, respectively, as set forth in the United States Patent Office Manual of Patent Examining Procedures, Section 2111.03.
This application claims the priority benefit, under 35 U.S.C. 119(e), of U.S. Application No. 63/078,604, which was filed on Sep. 15, 2020, and is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
This invention was made with Government support under Grant No. W911NF-17-1-0435 and W911NF-19-2-0186 awarded by the Army Research Office, and under Grant No. D18AC00014 awarded by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA). The Government has certain rights in this invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5581499 | Hamamdjian | Dec 1996 | A |
5619139 | Holczer | Apr 1997 | A |
9910104 | Boesch | Mar 2018 | B2 |
10962610 | Ibrahim et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
20030117141 | Gerald, II | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040042525 | Offerhaus | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20080036462 | Schiano | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080198882 | Clar | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20100271016 | Barclay | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20140111154 | Roy | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140252250 | Botto | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150090033 | Budker | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150192532 | Clevenson | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150253355 | Grinolds | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150378261 | Englund | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160077167 | Heidmann | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160282427 | Heidmann | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160313408 | Hatano | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20170146615 | Wolf | May 2017 | A1 |
20170322244 | Chipaux | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170370979 | Braje | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180203080 | Acosta | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180252781 | Meriles | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20190235031 | Ibrahim et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190331674 | Connolly | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190353975 | Didomenico | Nov 2019 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Patange, Om. On an instrument for the coherent investigation of nitrogen-vacancy centres in diamond. MS thesis. University of Waterloo, 2013. (Year: 2013). |
Acosta et al., “Broadband magnetometry by infrared-absorption detection of nitrogen-vacancy ensembles in diamond.” Applied Physics Letters 97.17 (2010): 174104. 3 pages. |
Acosta et al., “Optical properties of the nitrogen-vacancy singlet levels in diamond.” Physical Review B 82.20 (2010): 201202. 4 pages. |
Aslam et al., “Nanoscale nuclear magnetic resonance with chemical resolution.” Science 357.6346 (2017): 67-71. |
Barnes et al., “Surface plasmon polaritons and their role in the enhanced transmission of light through periodic arrays of subwavelength holes in a metal film.” Physical review letters 92.10 (2004): 107401. 4 pages. |
Barry et al., “Sensitivity optimization for NV-diamond magnetometry.” Reviews of Modern Physics 92.1 (2020): 015004. 68 pages. |
Bougas et al., “On the possibility of miniature diamond-based magnetometers using waveguide geometries.” Micromachines 9.6 (2018): 276. 11 pages. |
Cappellaro et al., “Quantum correlation in disordered spin systems: Applications to magnetic sensing.” Physical Review A 80.3 (2009): 032311. 7 pages. |
Chatzidrosos, G. et al. Miniature Cavity-Enhanced Diamond Magnetometer. Phys. Rev. Applied 8, 044019 (2017). 5 pages. |
Choi et al., “Quantum metrology based on strongly correlated matter.” arXiv preprint arXiv:1801.00042 (2017). 11 pages. |
Choy et al., “Spontaneous emission and collection efficiency enhancement of single emitters in diamond via plasmonic cavities and gratings,” arXiv:1308.0522v1 [physics.optics] Aug. 2, 2013, 19 pages. |
Dumeige et al., “Magnetometry with nitrogen-vacancy ensembles in diamond based on infrared absorption in a doubly resonant optical cavity.” Physical Review B 87.15 (2013): 155202. 9 pages. |
Foy et al., “Wide-field magnetic field and temperature imaging using nanoscale quantum sensors.” ACS applied materials & interfaces 12.23 (2020): 26525-26533. |
Gao et al., “Rayleigh anomaly-surface plasmon polariton resonances in palladium and gold subwavelength hole arrays.” Optics Express 17.4 (2009): 2334-2340. |
Jensen et al., “Cavity-enhanced room-temperature magnetometry using absorption by nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond.” Physical Review Letters 112.16 (2014): 160802. 5 pages. |
Karamlou et al., “Metal-dielectric antennas for efficient photon collection from diamond color centers.” Optics E0xpress 26.3 (2018): 3341-3352. |
Kim et al., “Absorption-Based Diamond Spin Microscopy on a Plasmonic Quantum Metasurface,” arXiv:2011.04885 (submitted on Nov. 10, 2020 (v1), last revised Nov. 21, 2020 (this version, v2)), 13 pages. |
Meng et al., “Quantum spin liquid emerging in two-dimensional correlated Dirac fermions.” Nature 464.7290 (2010): 847-851. |
Nichol et al., “Nanoscale Fourier-transform magnetic resonance imaging.” Physical Review X 3.3 (2013): 031016. 7 pages. |
Perunicic et al., “A quantum spin-probe molecular microscope.” Nature Communications 7.1 (2016): 1-10. |
Robledo et al., “Spin dynamics in the optical cycle of single nitrogen-vacancy centres in diamond.” New Journal of Physics 13.2 (2011): 025013. 12 pages. |
Steele et al., “Metallodielectric gratings with subwavelength slots: Optical properties.” Physical Review B 68.20 (2003): 205103. 7 pages. |
Steinert et al., “Magnetic spin imaging under ambient conditions with sub-cellular resolution.” Nature Communications 4.1 (2013): 1-6. |
Takagi et al., “Concept and realization of Kitaev quantum spin liquids.” Nature Reviews Physics 1.4 (2019): 264-280. |
Tetienne et al., “Magnetic-field-dependent photodynamics of single NV defects in diamond: an application to qualitative all-optical magnetic imaging.” New Journal of Physics 14.10 (2012): 103033. 16 pages. |
Trusheim et al., “Wide-field strain imaging with preferentially aligned nitrogen-vacancy centers in polycrystalline diamond.” New Journal of Physics 18.12 (2016): 123023. 8 pages. |
Turner et al., “Magnetic Field Fingerprinting of Integrated Circuit Activity with a Quantum Diamond Microscope.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.03707 (2020). 12 pages. |
Ulbricht et al., “Excited-state lifetime of the N V—infrared transition in diamond.” Physical Review B 98.9 (2018): 094309. 4 pages. |
Wee et al., “Two-photon excited fluorescence of nitrogen-vacancy centers in proton-irradiated type lb diamond.” The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 111.38 (2007): 9379-9386. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220082639 A1 | Mar 2022 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
63078604 | Sep 2020 | US |