The subject application generally relates to vapor sensing systems and in particular to a combined vapor-sensor and shutdown control that mitigates undesirable ignition of vapors.
Flammable Vapor Ignition Resistant (FVIR) systems commonly found in water heaters have become a safety standard in the water heater market. When employed, FVIR systems significantly reduce the potential for ignition of flammable vapors outside of the water heater by the water heater's pilot flame. A conventional FVIR system is at least a two-component system that first detects the presence of a vapor using a first component and that secondly stops operation of the particular device using a separate, second component. For example, when flammable vapors are detected by way of one or more sensors, the FVIR system can trigger a circuit or fuse connected thereto to short or open electrically in order to shut down the ignition switch or pilot flame and gas supply to ultimately prevent ignition of the vapors. A variety of flammable vapors such as from everyday cleaning solvents, gasoline, and paint thinners that can be ignited near an open flame or pilot flame; however, sensors typically used in FVIR systems are indiscriminate to the type of vapor they can detect. This can be problematic in some instances such as when the ambient air in proximity of the sensors includes certain vapors originating or produced from other operating conditions that do not necessarily present an ignition risk. Therefore, the predominance of FVIR systems are somewhat customized for water heaters and cannot automatically be utilized by other gas-burning appliances.
The following presents a simplified summary in order to provide a basic understanding of some aspects of the systems and/or methods discussed herein. This summary is not an extensive overview of the systems and/or methods discussed herein. It is not intended to identify key/critical elements or to delineate the scope of such systems and/or methods. Its sole purpose is to present some concepts in a simplified form as a prelude to the more detailed description that is presented later.
The subject application relates to a gas arrestor system(s) and/or methodology that facilitate sensing and shutting down a gas-burning appliance via a circuit, wherein a sensor circuit can perform both sensing and shut-down functions nearly simultaneously. According to one aspect of the application, the gas arrestor system comprises at least two sensing resistors arranged in parallel within a power circuit, wherein the at least two sensing resistors are heated and adsorb oxygen on their surfaces to yield a build up of resistance and an isolation barrier between the resistors during normal operation of the gas burning device, and wherein the at least two sensing resistors detect at least one kind of gas at a specific concentration level by way of their voltage output; and a decision component that measures the voltage output from the at least two sensing resistors to determine whether the voltage output correlates to a calibrated level below a lower flammable limit of at least one specific gas at a specific concentration, characterized in that when the voltage output indicates the presence of at least one specified gas at a prescribed concentration, the at least two sensing resistors are shorted, thereby terminating power from the power circuit.
According to another aspect of the application, a gas-arresting method is provided to mitigate undesirable ignition of gas or vapor near or escaping from a gas burning device. The method comprises arranging two sensing resistors in parallel in a power circuit, the power circuit providing power to at least a portion of the gas burning device; measuring a voltage output from the two sensing resistors; and shorting the two sensing resistors when the voltage output indicates that a specified gas is present in ambient air at a specified concentration which results in a termination of power from the power circuit, thereby mitigating a potential fire hazard.
To the accomplishment of the foregoing and related ends, certain illustrative aspects of the invention are described herein in connection with the following description and the annexed drawings. These aspects are indicative, however, of but a few of the various ways in which the principles of the invention may be employed and the subject invention is intended to include all such aspects and their equivalents. Other advantages and novel features of the invention may become apparent from the following detailed description of the invention when considered in conjunction with the drawings.
The invention may take physical form in certain parts and arrangement of parts, an example embodiment of which will be described in detail in this specification and illustrated in the accompanying drawings that form a part of the specification. The foregoing and other features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art to which the present invention relates upon reading the following description with reference to the accompanying drawings. A brief description of each figure is as follows:
The subject systems and/or methods are now described with reference to the drawings, wherein like reference numerals are used to refer to like elements throughout. In the following description, for purposes of explanation, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the systems and/or methods. It may be evident, however, that the subject systems and/or methods may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well-known structures and devices are shown in block diagram form in order to facilitate describing them.
The subject application relates to a gas arrestor system(s) and/or methodology that facilitate sensing and shutting down a gas-burning appliance via a circuit that can perform both functions. In particular, the gas arrestor system and methodology can be employed in absorption refrigeration units which can operate in the presence of other gases or vapors in the ambient air. Typically, absorption refrigerators are used on recreational vehicles (RVs) and marine vessels or wherever electricity is less reliable, costly, or unavailable. An absorption refrigerator utilizes a heat source to provide the energy that it needs to operate the cooling system. When installed on an RV, for instance, the absorption refrigerator may commonly be exposed to outside air which can include carbon monoxide and/or other exhaust fumes related to the RV idling or traveling on a roadway or dispensing gasoline during re-fueling operations. The outside air can also include vapors from propane being delivered to the appliance (or to another appliance) or from LP gas or propane containers. Conventional FVIR sensor and alarm systems are not discriminative among different gases and thus alarm when any gas or vapor is detected at the prescribed concentration level. Therefore, such FVIR systems cannot be utilized in the dynamic environment of absorption refrigeration units.
Contrary to the FVIR systems, the gas arrestor system as described herein can detect specific types of gases at even lower and more specific concentration levels. In particular, the gas arrestor system involves a sensor-shut-down control in which all or a part of the refrigeration unit can be disabled by virtue of a shorted sensor. Conventional FVIR and other vapor detection systems typically require at least two separate components in order to detect and mitigate a potential fire hazard: (1) a sensor to detect the vapor and (2) a microprocessor to take appropriate action in response to the sensor and/or (3) a separate fuse that is shorted or blown in response to the sensor and/or microprocessor. Unlike such FVIR and other traditional vapor detection systems, the subject system employs a single component to perform both vapor detection and shutdown functions. When the requisite amount or concentration of vapor is detected, potential ignition source(s) associated with the operation of the appliance can be terminated or closed to stop the flow of flammable liquids or gases (e.g., fuel supply) and/or the entire refrigeration unit can be disabled, which would also result in the termination of any ignition sources.
Referring now to
In practice, for example, imagine that the gas arrestor system 10 is installed in an absorption refrigerator which typically employs ammonia in order to function and cool perishable goods properly. A build-up of ammonia vapors near the pilot light or ignition control may lead to an undesirable ignition of the vapors. With the system 10 in place, the build-up of ammonia vapors near or around the sensing resistors affects the voltage output from the resistors, thus causing a break down in the isolation barrier and resistance; and the resistors are effectively shorted out. Because the power for the one or more ignition sources is controlled at least in part by circuitry components connected to the first and second resistors, a short in the resistors terminates the power to any connected ignition sources.
The decision component 50 can be used to measure a voltage from the specific gas detection sensing resistor (20, 30). Depending on the voltage output of the sensor, the decision component 50 determines whether there are specific gases present at specified concentrations to air or vent and either shuts the system down or allows the system to continue to operate. For instance, when gases are present above the concentration levels for which the sensing resistors are calibrated, the decision component 50 can signal a relay to open the power circuit (switch 60) of the absorption refrigerant system, including any or all fuel supply sources 70 or ignition sources 80. For additional safety concerns, the decision component 50 can include a non-volatile memory that memorizes any occurrence of an arrestor system-based shut down of power and prohibit restarting the refrigerant system without service. Therefore, a user of the refrigerant system is not permitted to manually turn the unit back on before obtaining professional maintenance for the unit. To alert the user of a shutdown, a notification component 90 can be included in the system 10. Notification can involve an audible alarm and/or a visual indicator to make the user aware of the shutdown.
Turning now to
However, as shown in
Though not pictured in the figures, other types of sensing devices can be incorporated into the gas arrestor system 10. For example, a temperature or heat sensor can be included to monitor the temperature near an ignition point or within a particular chamber of a gas-burning device. By doing so, unexpected increases in the temperature can signal an alarm that the device may be malfunctioning such as overheating or not cooling properly or the higher temperature may indicate the presence of a fire or undesirable flames.
Optical sensors can also be employed as a further or entirely independent measure to mitigate a potential fire or the unintentional ignition of flammable vapors. For instance, optical sensors can be used to optically detect a presence of flames or the presence of an ignition that is abnormal to the operation of a burner or other ignition source. Optical sensors can monitor for the presence of flames in chambers or areas of the gas-burning device where flames are not normally found and then shutdown the fuel source or device and alert the user accordingly.
Various methodologies will now be described via a series of acts. It is to be understood and appreciated that the subject system and/or methodology is not limited by the order of acts, as some acts may, in accordance with the subject application, occur in different orders and/or concurrently with other acts from that shown and described herein. For example, those skilled in the art will understand and appreciate that a methodology could alternatively be represented as a series of interrelated states or events, such as in a state diagram. Moreover, not all illustrated acts may be required to implement a methodology in accordance with the subject application.
During such routine operation of the device, the sensing resistors are heated and adsorb oxygen on their surface, thereby building up an isolation barrier and resistance between the layers. This resistance effectively completes (or closes) the circuit in order to deliver a sufficient amount of voltage to the fuel supply line or valve, to the ignition point, and/or to the power switch of the device. The voltage output from the sensing resistors can be measured periodically at 120. When the voltage output indicates that a specified gas is present in ambient air at a specified concentration, the method 100 at 130 shorts the two sensing resistors, which effectively terminates power to at least the ignition point from the power circuit. For example, imagine that a voltage output of R corresponds to an ammonia concentration of 900 ppm, which may be below a lower explosion limit but may exceed a desirable ammonia concentration for a particular gas-burning appliance. The voltage output of R can be sufficient to break down the isolation barrier and resistance between the sensing resistors. This drop or loss of voltage opens the circuit, and the appliance turns off almost, if not, immediately thereafter to mitigate an unintentional lighting of the ammonia vapors. Alternatively, the ignition point, burner, or fuel source lines can be closed or deactivated.
What has been described above includes examples of the subject system and/or method. It is, of course, not possible to describe every conceivable combination of components or methodologies for purposes of describing the subject system and/or method, but one of ordinary skill in the art may recognize that many further combinations and permutations of the subject system and/or method are possible. Accordingly, the subject system and/or method are intended to embrace all such alterations, modifications, and variations that fall within the spirit and scope of the appended claims. Furthermore, to the extent that the term “includes” is used in either the detailed description or the claims, such term is intended to be inclusive in a manner similar to the term “comprising” as “comprising” is interpreted when employed as a transitional word in a claim.