The present invention relates to a vehicular AC generator.
Stator coils in vehicular AC generators are configured by adopting a distributed winding structure, a concentrated winding structure or the like of the known art. For instance, a winding structure in the known art includes a first three-phase connection coil achieved by connecting over three phases three stator coils that are wound at teeth of a stator core through short-pitch lap winding relative to the magnetic pole pitch assumed at a rotor, and a second three-phase winding coil achieved as is the first three-phase connection coil by connecting over three phases three stator coils that are wound at teeth each with an offset of π/3 (rad) in electric angle relative to one of the stator coils in the first three-phase connection coil through short-pitch lap winding (see, for instance, Patent Literature 1).
In view of the recent issue of energy conservation, a further improvement in the efficiency of vehicular AC generators is pursued with increasing zeal. However, an improvement of about 70% in efficiency has been achieved at most through existing technologies and a more improvement cannot be achieved.
According to the 1st aspect of the present invention, a vehicular AC generator comprises: a rotor with a plurality of magnetic poles, assuming a shape for suppressing bias magnetism, and disposed along a circumferential direction, which includes a field winding; a stator disposed so as to leave a gap between the rotor and the stator; and a semiconductor element that rectifies an AC current induced at a stator coil wound at the stator as power is supplied to the field winding at the rotor so as to convert the AC current to a DC current, wherein: the stator is formed by laminating electromagnetic steel plates; and a resistance value of the stator coil wound at the stator is set to a value equal to or less than a predetermined value.
According to the 2nd aspect of the present invention, a vehicular AC generator comprises: a rotor with a plurality of magnetic poles, assuming a shape for suppressing bias magnetism and disposed along a circumferential direction, which includes a field winding; a stator disposed so as to leave a gap between the rotor and the stator; and a semiconductor element that rectifies an AC current induced at a stator coil wound at the stator as power is supplied to the field winding at the rotor so as to convert the AC current to a DC current, wherein: the stator is formed by laminating electromagnetic steel plates; and a stator ohmic loss manifesting under a half load is equal to or less than a predetermined value.
According to the 3rd aspect of the present invention, a vehicular AC generator comprises: a rotor with a plurality of magnetic poles, assuming a shape for suppressing bias magnetism and disposed along a circumferential direction, which includes a field winding; a stator disposed so as to leave a gap between the rotor and the stator and assuming a diameter equivalent to a diameter of a stator in a nominal Φ 139 vehicular AC generator; and a diode that rectifies an AC current induced at a stator coil wound at the stator as power is supplied to the field winding at the rotor so as to convert the AC current to a DC current, wherein: the stator is formed by laminating electromagnetic steel plates; and a stator ohmic loss is less than a sum of a rectification loss occurring at the diode, a mechanical loss and a field ohmic loss.
According to the 4th aspect of the present invention, a vehicular AC generator comprises: a rotor with a plurality of magnetic poles, assuming a shape for suppressing bias magnetism and disposed along a circumferential direction, which includes a field winding; a stator disposed so as to leave a gap between the rotor and the stator and assuming a diameter equivalent to a diameter of a stator in a nominal Φ 128 vehicular AC generator; and a diode that rectifies an AC current induced at a stator coil wound at the stator as power is supplied to the field winding at the rotor so as to convert the AC current to a DC current, wherein: the stator is formed by laminating electromagnetic steel plates; and a sum of a stator ohmic loss and an iron loss is less than a sum of a rectification loss occurring at the diode, a mechanical loss and a field ohmic loss.
According to the 5th aspect of the present invention, a vehicular AC generator comprises: a rotor with a plurality of magnetic poles, assuming a shape for suppressing bias magnetism and disposed along a circumferential direction, which includes a field winding; a stator disposed so as to leave a gap between the rotor and the stator; and a diode that rectifies an AC current induced at a stator coil wound at the stator as power is supplied to the field winding at the rotor, so as to convert the AC current to a DC current, wherein: the stator is formed by laminating electromagnetic steel plates with a thickness of 0.35 mm, which manifest a loss of 2 to 3 W/kg when a rotational frequency is 50 Hz and a magnetic flux density is 1.5 T; and a sum of a stator ohmic loss and iron loss is set equal to or less than a predetermined value so as to ensure that power generation efficiency of at least 76% is achieved under a half load.
According to the 6th aspect of the present invention, a vehicular AC generator comprises: a rotor with a plurality of magnetic poles, assuming a shape for suppressing bias magnetism and disposed along a circumferential direction, which includes a field winding; a stator disposed so as to leave a gap between the rotor and the stator; and a MOSFET that rectifies an AC current induced at a stator coil wound at the stator as power is supplied to the field winding at the rotor, so as to convert the AC current to a DC current, wherein: the stator is formed by laminating electromagnetic steel plates with a thickness of 0.35 mm, which manifest a loss of 2 to 3 W/kg when a rotational frequency is 50 Hz and a magnetic flux density is 1.5 T; and a sum of a stator ohmic loss and iron loss is set equal to or less than a predetermined value so as to ensure that power generation efficiency of at least 86% is achieved under a half load.
According to the present invention, a further improvement is achieved in the efficiency of vehicular AC generators.
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
The following is a description of the embodiments of the present invention. As explained earlier, in order to achieve further improvement in the efficiency of vehicular AC generators, various loss values, which are critical factors in realizing target efficiency, must be evaluated separately through better optimized loss analysis. The loss analysis method adopted in conjunction with the embodiments is first described.
Losses occurring in a vehicular AC generator (may be referred to as an alternator in the following description) are categorized as; (1) rectification loss (loss occurring in relation to rectification), (2) mechanical loss, (3) field ohmic loss, (4) iron loss (including the eddy current loss occurring at the rotor) and (5) stator ohmic loss. The extents of rectification loss, the mechanical loss, the stator ohmic loss and the field ohmic loss among these five types of losses, can be estimated relatively accurately based upon the operating conditions. However, it is difficult to measure or estimate the iron loss and, for this reason, the total iron loss can only be estimated as the difference obtained by subtracting the four other losses from the entire loss.
The iron loss analysis method adopted in conjunction with the embodiments is first briefly described. It is to be noted that the methods through which the losses other than the iron loss are calculated will be described later. The iron loss is attributed to stator iron loss and eddy current loss occurring at the rotor. However, the stator iron loss and the eddy current loss at the rotor cannot be measured separately from each other while the generator operates under a load, e.g., in a half load state. Accordingly, an iron loss value is estimated for the embodiments as described below. In a no-load state, in which a current does not flow through a stator coil, the loss (no-load loss) will include the mechanical loss and the stator iron loss attributable to the magnetic field. Thus, the iron loss in the no-load state can be ascertained by subtracting the mechanical loss from the loss measured in the no-load state.
In the actual half-load state, a magnetic field is generated by current (electrical current attributable to induced voltage) flowing through the stator coil. The phase of this magnetic field is shifted relative to the phase of the magnetic field at the rotor by 90°, and bias magnetism manifests at the claw poles at the rotor due to this. While the magnetic field at the claw poles assumes a sine wave distribution in case of no bias magnetism, the magnetic field at the claw poles is biased in the event of bias magnetism, so as to manifest a peak further toward the downstream side along the rotating direction. In the latter case, an eddy current occurring near the surfaces of the magnetic poles as a result will cause loss. For this reason, the extent of the total iron loss, including the eddy current loss occurring at the rotor when there is bias magnetism is assumed to be greater than the loss represented by the value obtained by subtracting the mechanical loss from the no-load measured loss value.
Through a loss analysis conducted by the inventor of the present invention with regard to various types of alternators, it has been learned that the extent of bias magnetism can be lowered by forming bias magnetism suppressing portions, referred to as bevels, each at one of the two edges present along the circumferential direction at a rotor claw pole, and that the extent of loss attributable to such bias magnetism can thus be minimized through the formation of the bias magnetism suppressing portions. The bias magnetism suppressing portions may assume a chamfered contour or a round shape.
a) shows a rotor 1 of an alternator in perspective. It is to be noted that the overall structure of the alternator will be described later. The rotor 1 includes claw poles 113 extending along the axial direction from one end surface, and claw poles 113 extending from the other end surface in the opposite direction, which take up alternate positions along the circumferential direction. As shown in
The efficiency of vehicular AC generators is evaluated through the method stipulated by the VDA (Verband der Automobil Industrie), which is at present considered to be the most reliable high efficiency evaluation index. In the evaluation method, values at 1800 rpm, 3000 rpm, 6000 rpm and 10,000 rpm are weighted respectively at 25%, 40%, 25% and 10% relative to half-load data for purposes of evaluation. In reference to the embodiments, losses are examined by adopting this evaluation method.
The following description is given in reference to an example in which 75% efficiency is achieved in a nominal Φ 139 alternator (with an output of 180 A). Assuming that the output current and the output voltage in the half-load state are respectively 90 A and 14V, the following conditions must be satisfied in order to achieve 75% efficiency. It is to be noted that the term “nominal Φ 139 alternator” refers to an alternator with a specific size represented by its outer diameter dimension. The outer diameter of the nominal Φ 139 alternator is normally within a range of Φ 137˜Φ 141. In addition, while it will be obvious that the voltage output from the alternator in actual operation is bound to fluctuate within an approximate range of 14±0.5 V and thus the calculation results (the loss and resistance value to be detailed later) are also bound to assume a certain range corresponding to the range over which the output power fluctuates, the following description is given by assuming that the output power is fixed at 14 V.
output: 14 V×90 A=1260 W
input: 1260 V÷0.76≈1658 W
loss: 1658 W−1260 W=398 W
As explained earlier, the total loss is attributed to (1) rectification loss (loss related to the rectification), (2) mechanical loss, (3) field ohmic loss, (4) iron loss (which includes the eddy current loss occurring at the rotor surface) and (5) stator ohmic loss. In the example described below, the various types of losses in an alternator assuring the highest level of efficiency at the present time (hereafter referred to as an “actual unit”) are analyzed and conditions that are needed to be fulfilled in order to achieve the desired level of efficiency are determined based upon the analysis results. In other words, conditions that will allow a total loss equal to or less than 398 W are determined.
(1) Rectification Loss
The value representing the rectification loss, which occurs at diodes in a rectifier circuit, is dependent upon a decrease in the forward-direction voltage occurring at the diodes. The description is given in specific terms by assuming that the forward-direction voltage drop occurring at the diodes in the half-load (90 A) state is 0.84 V. It will be difficult to reduce the forward-direction voltage drop beyond 0.84 V obtained through actual measurement of a forward-direction voltage drop at a p-n junction diode. Accordingly, the rectification loss should be calculated as; 90 A×0.84 V×2≈151 W. As long as a p-n junction diode is used for a rectifier element, it will not be possible to reduce the rectification loss beyond this value.
(2) Mechanical Loss
No current flows through a stator coil in a no-load state, in which a stator coil terminal is left in an open state. Accordingly, it can be safely assumed that as long as there is no field current and no load is applied, only the mechanical loss will be measured, since the losses related to an electrical current or a magnetic field (the ohmic loss and the iron loss) do not occur. The loss measured when there is no field current and no load is applied, is thus designated as the mechanical loss in relation to the embodiments. Measurement data obtained by measuring losses at the actual unit indicate that losses occurring in the no field current/no load state at various rotation rates, which are selected for purposes of half-load evaluation, are 8 W (1800 rpm), 18 W (3000 rpm), 56 W (6000 rpm) and 140 W (10,000 rpm). Accordingly, the mechanical loss in the half-load state should be calculated as;
8 W×0.25+18 W×0.4+56 W×0.25+140 W×0.1≈37 W.
(3) Field Ohmic Loss
The field current in the half load state (90 A) is 2.5 A at 3000 rpm. Since the field current becomes less than 2.5 A when the rotation rate is higher than 3000 rpm, the highest level of field ohmic loss corresponding to 2.5 A is calculated. Assuming that the temperature of the field coil is 100° C. and the resistance value at the field coil at room temperature is 2.0Ω, the field ohmic loss should be calculated as;
2.0Ω×(234.5+100)/(234.5+20)×2.52≈16 W.
(4) Iron Loss
While the iron loss is analyzed as has already been explained, the iron loss in the no-load state can be ascertained by subtracting the mechanical loss from the loss measured in the no-load state as described above. For instance, a no-load state loss of 11 W is calculated by subtracting the no-load loss measurement value at 3000 rpm from the mechanical loss of 18 W at 3000 rpm. The no-load state loss of 11 W calculated as described above for the actual unit used in conjunction with the embodiments, with bevels formed at the rotor thereof, is close to the actual measurement value, indicating that the total sum of the individually ascertained losses and the actual total loss substantially match each other.
The iron loss is normally calculated as expressed in “iron loss ∞ f2×Bm2” with f representing the frequency and Bm representing the magnetic flux density. As the rotation rate (frequency) in an alternator increases, the magnetic flux density decreases in inverse proportion. Accordingly, the iron loss (including the eddy current loss at the rotor) is considered to remain constant regardless of the rotation rate. In other words, the loss value of 11 W calculated in correspondence to a rotation rate of 3000 rpm can be regarded as the iron loss in the VDA base. It is to be noted that the stator cores of the vehicular AC generators achieved in the embodiments are constituted with an electromagnetic steel plate assuming a thickness of 0.35 mm and manifesting a loss of 2.16 W/kg in correspondence to a frequency of 50 Hz and a magnetic flux density of 1.5 T, so as to minimize the iron loss. While the electromagnetic steel plate used in the embodiments manifests a loss of 2.16 W/kg at the magnetic flux density of 1.5 T, the present invention may be adopted in conjunction with an electromagnetic steel plate manifesting a loss of 2.15 through 3.0 W/kg. In addition, the electromagnetic steel plate may assume a thickness of 0.5 mm instead of 0.35 mm.
(5) Stator Ohmic Loss
The stator ohmic loss may be calculated as expressed below with r representing the value of resistance at the primary stator at room temperature, assuming that the temperature of the stator coil is 80° C. It is to be noted that the stator coil is connected through a double star connection and that the resistance value r corresponds to a single-phase coil in the double star connection. In addition, 0.817 is a coefficient used when converting a DC current to an AC current.
rΩ×(234.5+80)/(234.5+20)×6×(0.817×90 A/2)2≈10022r
As described earlier, in order to achieve 76% efficiency or better in the nominal Φ 139 alternator (output: 180 A), it must be ensured that the total sum of the individual types of losses mentioned earlier does not exceed 398 W. Provided that the lost values calculated as described earlier are valid in the actual unit designed to minimize the rectification loss, the mechanical loss, the field ohmic loss and the iron loss, 76% efficiency or better is likely to be achieved by ensuring that the stator ohmic loss satisfies the condition expressed below while designing the stator coil.
(Stator ohmic loss)≦398−151 W+37 W+16 W+11 W)=183 W
Accordingly, if the resistance value r of the stator coil is set so that “r≦0.018Ω”, in order to satisfy the condition “10022r≦183 W”, 76% efficiency or better will be achieved. While the resistance value r is represented with two effective digits by taking into consideration the width of the output voltage and the like mentioned earlier, the resistance value 0.018Ω should be considered to assume a certain range that will include, for instance, 0.018*Ω or 0.017Ω* (* represents a given number). The total loss manifesting in an alternator has never been examined by analyzing the individual types of losses as separate and distinct elements in the related art. However, by adopting the analysis method adopted for the embodiments allows a specific target stator ohmic loss, which should be assured in order to achieve the desired efficiency, to be accurately ascertained.
The data obtained in relation to the nominal Φ 139 alternator (output 180 A) as described above, are presented in the column “Φ 139 ALT” in
While p-n junction diodes are used as rectifier diodes in the example described above, the rectification loss may be reduced by using Schottky diodes that assure an even smaller extent of forward-direction voltage drop. The forward-direction voltage drop occurring at a Schottky diode will be approximately ¾ of that occurring at a p-n junction diode. While the forward-direction voltage drop at the p-n junction diode is 0.84 V with a temperature Ta at 100° C. and a forward direction current of 30 A, the forward-direction voltage drop occurring at the Schottky diode under identical conditions will be 0.55 v. In the latter case, the rectification loss will be calculated as “98×0.55 V×2=99 W”, achieving a total loss of 346 W and 79% efficiency.
In addition, by using a synchronous rectifier circuit that includes rectifier elements constituted with MOSFETs having a lower ON resistance, instead of a rectifier circuit constituted with diodes, the rectification loss accounting for a relatively high proportion of the overall loss can be further reduced so as to achieve an even greater improvement in the efficiency (see the “Φ 139 MOSFET” column in
90 A×0.1V×2=18 W
The total loss in this case will be 265 W (=398 W−151 W+18 W), and the alternator efficiency will be improved to 82.6%.
Furthermore, a structure that includes permanent magnets, to act as auxiliary magnetizers in order to increase the field coil magnetic flux, disposed between the claw poles, as described in further detail later, is known in the related art. By disposing a permanent magnet constituted with a neodymium magnet between successive claw poles, an induced voltage can be increased, and the stator ohmic loss can be reduced by reducing the number of turns at the stator coil. In the column notated as “Φ 139 (MOSFET+neodymium)” in
The concept described above may also be adopted in a nominal Φ 128 alternator, as well as in the nominal Φ 139 alternator. Alternators with their outer diameters in a range of Φ 128 to Φ 139 are normally referred to as nominal Φ 128 alternators. The losses, the efficiency and the stator coil resistance value of the nominal Φ 128 alternator (output: 140 A) are indicated in the “Φ 128 ALT” column in
The data provided in the nominal Φ 139 ALT column and the nominal Φ 128 ALT column in
The double star connection is adopted in the nominal Φ 128 alternator in
The data presented in
If a 16 pole structure is adopted in the nominal Φ 128 alternator, the ohmic loss can be reduced due to the smaller number of turns. However, the iron loss is bound to increase. Through deliberation of these factors, it has been learned that efficiency of 76% or better can be achieved by ensuring that the sum of the stator ohmic loss and the iron loss never exceeds 150 Win the nominal Φ 128 alternator with 16 poles. The various types of losses in the nominal Φ 128 alternator with 16 poles are indicated in
In addition, MOSFETs or neodymium magnets may be used in the nominal Φ 128 alternator, as in the nominal Φ 139 alternator, to further improve its efficiency. The individual types of losses in the nominal Φ 128 alternator equipped with MOSFETs and neodymium magnets are indicated in the “Φ 128 (MOSFET+neodymium)” column in
The following stator winding structures may be adopted in order to achieve resistance values or stator ohmic losses meeting the requirements described above.
A vehicular AC generator, which includes a stator and a rotor each constituted with a winding and a iron core, generates power with a magnetomotive force induced at a coil wound at the stator as the rotor, magnetized with a DC current supplied to the winding wound at the rotor or with permanent magnets disposed at the rotor, rotates and a rotating magnetic field is thus formed at the stator.
A stator coil in a generator may be wound around teeth constituting magnetic poles of the stator by adopting a distributed winding structure or a concentrated winding structure. While the stator coil adopting a distributed winding structure may be wound through full pitch winding or short pitch winding, in either case the coil is wound substantially over 180° in electric angle and is then wound in the opposite direction over the remaining 180° in either case. Coils corresponding to all the phases are wound around the teeth of the stator. In the distributed winding structure, a magnetic flux induced with an electrical current flowing through a coil creates complete interlinkage at the particular coil. In other words, a magnetic flux induced in correspondence to a given coil turn achieves interlinkage with an adjacent same-phase coil turn. This means that the inductance at the coil is bound to be relatively large. The relatively large coil inductance is bound to result in a smaller electrical current generated in a generator or it may manifest as a poor coil current control response in a motor.
In the concentrated winding structure, on the other hand, completely separate coils, each corresponding to a specific phase, are wound at the teeth independently of one another. The strength of the magnetic flux from the rotor received at each coil is bound to be approximately “1/number of phases” in the 360° electric angle range. For instance, the magnetic flux received at each coil in a three-phase AC system will be approximately ⅓ in the 360° electric angle range. For this reason, the coil must be wound with a greater number of turns in order to increase the interlinking magnetic flux strength, which, in turn, increases the coil inductance. As a result, problems similar to those of the distributed winding structure are bound to occur in the concentrated winding structure. Namely, only a small electrical current will be generated in a generator or the coil current control response in a motor is bound to be compromised.
There is another issue to be addressed in the concentrated winding structure in that a significant higher harmonic component in electromagnetic forces caused by an armature reaction attributable to the electrical current flowing through the stator coil manifests as relatively significant noise during rotation. A sixth-order time higher harmonic component, which is one of the primary causes of noise, can be canceled out via two three-phase systems set with a phase difference Ø of approximately 30°. Since the phase difference Ø assumed in the related art described earlier is 60°, the sixth-order time higher harmonic component, i.e., one of the primary causes of noise, cannot be reduced readily.
In addition, since the related art described earlier is achieved fundamentally by adopting the concentrated winding structure, only the part of the interlinking magnetic flux provided from the rotor, which corresponds to a 120° electric angle range, can be utilized in conjunction with the stator coil corresponding to a given phase in a generator. In other words, while the interlinking magnetic flux is utilized over the 360° electric angle range in the distributed winding structure, the interlinking magnetic flux is only partially utilized in the three-phase concentrated winding system.
Each of the following embodiments through which the ohmic loss can be kept down by minimizing the size of a coil return located at a stator end, improves the efficiency with which a rotating electrical machine operates.
In addition, since the higher harmonic component in electromagnetic force can be reduced relative to that in the concentrated winding structure, noise reduction can be achieved through the following embodiments.
Furthermore, in the embodiments to be described below, the self-inductance at a coil in a system through which a matching induced voltage is obtained, i.e., in a system assuming a mutual inductance equal to that on the rotor side, can be lowered relative to the coil self-inductance in the distributed winding structure or the concentrated winding structure. The coil self-inductance in the embodiments can be kept down since, unlike the coil wound over the full range in the distributed winding structure, the coil corresponding to each phase in the embodiments is allocated with only part of the 360° electric angle range and thus, only part of the interlinking magnetic flux generated at the coil itself interlinks with the coil. Moreover, a stator coil and a rotor magnetic pole in the concentrated winding structure face opposite each other over an area amounting to only half the area over which the stator coil and the rotor magnetic pole face opposite each other in the present invention. Thus, the number of coil turns in the concentrated winding structure must be greater in order to assure a higher level of induced voltage. Since the coil inductance increases exponentially with the number of coil turns, the coil inductance is bound to increase in this situation. Since the coil self-inductance can be kept low in any of the following embodiments, better coil current control characteristics are assured when the present invention is adopted in a motor, and improved power generation characteristics are achieved when it is adopted in a generator.
In addition, in the following embodiments adopted in vehicular AC generators operated in a wide rotation rate range, from a low rotation rate of 2000 rpm or lower through a high rotation rate of 15,000 rpm or higher, very good electrical characteristics are assured in the full rotation rate range. A vehicular AC generator generates electric power based upon rotational energy in an internal combustion engine that drives the vehicle. The extremely wide rotation rate range through which such a vehicular AC generator is utilized gives rise to an issue in that the impedance attributable to the stator coil inductance is bound to increase in the high rotation rate range, to result in a reduced output current. Such a decrease in the output current may lead to lowered efficiency as well. Through the embodiments described below, it is ensured that the stator coil inductance does not increase readily and thus, the current output characteristics in the high rotation rate range are improved.
While an explanation has been given so far on improvements achieved from the viewpoint of electrical performance, problems other than those discussed above can be solved and advantages other than those described above can be achieved through the following embodiments. Any of the embodiments described below, adopted in a vehicular AC generator with fewer turns at the stator winding can be manufactured with improved productivity. Namely, it is an essential requirement for a vehicular AC generator, which is to be installed in a vehicle, that it be provided as a compact unit. In the embodiments described below, a smaller number of turns is assumed at the stator and thus, better productivity is assured even when the stator is manufactured as a more compact unit. Furthermore, since the stator assumes a smaller number of turns compared to stators in the related art, the need for miniaturization can be more easily met.
Through the embodiments to be described below, superior productivity or a high level of reliability is assured since the number of connecting points in the stator winding is kept down. More specifically, a vehicular AC generator is likely to be operated in an environment where vibration of the body or vibration of the internal combustion engine is transmitted readily. In addition, it is likely to be operated in an environment where the temperature changes drastically from below 0 to very high temperatures. For these reasons, it is desirable to minimize the number of connecting points such as welding areas. Since the following embodiments assure fewer coil turns and a greater area where the coil is exposed, heat trapping or the like that would readily occur as coils are buried under other coils can be avoided, and thus, superior heat resistance characteristics are achieved. In this sense, too, the embodiments described below can be adopted in vehicular AC generators in an ideal manner.
A solid line indicates a coil wound forward (wound along the clockwise direction around the teeth viewed from the inner circumferential side), whereas a dotted line indicates a coil wound along the reverse direction (wound along the counterclockwise direction around the teeth viewed from the inner circumferential side). While
In other words, the stator 2 is disposed so as to form an air gap between the stator 2 and the rotor 1, the coils are wound so that two stator magnetic poles 91 and 92 are formed with coil turns corresponding to a given phase within the 360° electric angle range, the angular widths assumed by the coil turns, which form the stator magnetic poles 91 and 92, along the circumferential direction, are each smaller than 180° in electric angle, the coil turns forming the two stator magnetic poles 91 and 92 are set by ensuring that they do not overlap each other, and the stator magnetic poles 91 and 92 in each stator magnetic pole pair assume opposite polarities in this rotating electrical machine.
The coil turns forming the two stator magnetic poles 91 and 92 in the rotating electrical machine are shifted relative to each other by 180° in electric angle. Stator magnetic poles formed in correspondence to the three phases U, V and W are shifted relative to one another by 60° in electric angle. It is to be noted that the V-phase coils are wound along the direction opposite from the direction in which the U-phase coils are wound. As a result, the phase of the V-phase coils is retarded by +60°−180°=−120°. Namely, the phase of the V-phase coils is retarded by 120° relative to the phase of the U-phase coils. In addition, the phase of the W-phase coils, wound along the direction matching the direction in which the U-phase coils are wound, is advanced by 2×60°=120° relative to the phase of the U-phase coils. Furthermore, each coil turn ranges over 120° width in electric angle and the two coil turns corresponding to a given phase together amount to a total angular width of 240°, i.e., teeth accounting for ⅔ of all the teeth. In the following description, this coil winding method will be referred to as a “dispersal winding” structure.
The individual coil turns in the stator coil achieved in the embodiment as described above interlink with the magnetic flux from the rotor over a circuit area twice as large as that achieved in a concentrated winding structure with a single concentrated winding coil disposed within the 360° electric angle range and, as a result, the stator coil in the embodiment assures coil utilization efficiency twice that of the concentrated winding structure. In other words, an interlinking magnetic flux, the intensity of which matches that of the interlinking magnetic flux achieved in the concentrated winding structure, can be obtained through the embodiment with the number of coil turns at any given tooth reduced to half the number of corresponding coil turns in the concentrated winding structure. The U-phase coils, the V-phase coils and the W-phase coils in the winding structure are each present over a range twice as large as the coil range of the concentrated winding structure and the coils corresponding to each phase is wound at teeth accounting for ⅔ of all the teeth, unlike the coils in the distributed winding structure, which are wound at all the teeth. This means that a lower coil inductance is achieved compared to the coil inductances in the concentrated winding structure and the distributed winding structure.
In addition, since the winding structure in the embodiment allows the coils to be present over a range twice as large as that in the concentrated winding structure and the U-phase coils, the V-phase coils and the W-phase coils are wound with an overlap, the extent of which is equivalent to approximately half a turn. As a result, the armature reaction can be distributed along the circumferential direction relatively smoothly compared to the armature reaction distribution in the concentrated winding structure, which, in turn, leads to a reduction in the higher harmonic component attributable to higher-order electromagnetic forces. This allows the vehicular AC generator to function as a quieter rotating electrical machine compared to a rotating electrical machine adopting the concentrated winding structure.
It is to be noted that while one stator tooth is set every 60° in electric angle and the coils are wound with each coil turn assuming a width equivalent to 120° in electric angle in the example presented in
The present embodiment includes stator coils wound differently from the coils in embodiment 1. The stator coils are each wound at teeth 21 over two layers, to range from a position in a slot closer to the rotor over to a position further away from the rotor. The coils are wound so as to assure uniformity for all the coils with regard to their positions assumed along the radial direction. Namely, one of the two slots insertion portions that each coil turn includes is set in a slot at a position closer to the rotor and the other slot insertion portion is set in a slot at a position further away from the rotor, so as to assure consistency among the coil inductances corresponding to the individual phases. While uniformity is achieved with regard to the coil positions assumed at the teeth 21 along the radial direction by serially connecting the coils corresponding to the individual phases in embodiment 1, uniformity is assured for all the coils that are not serially connected. The schematic diagram presented in
An even distribution of coils corresponding to the individual phases at the teeth 21 along the radial direction is highly desirable, since it facilitates configuration of a stable three-phase AC system.
The U-phase coil 31, the V-phase coil 32 and the W-phase coil 33 in
It is to be noted that the coils corresponding to the three phases are wound by ensuring that equal numbers of coil segments are inserted in the individual slots formed between the plurality of teeth 21. By ensuring that a uniform number of coil segments are inserted in each slot, an even coil distribution is achieved. Since the coils do not need to concentrate in any particular spot, they can be wound with better ease and the coils can be uniformly cooled with cooling air. It will be obvious that the dispersal winding structure achieved in the embodiment may be adopted in conjunction with coils inserted in varying numbers at different slots, as well.
A total of four coil segments are inserted through each slot in embodiment 3. It is to be noted that the present embodiment can be adopted in applications in which an even number of coil segments are inserted through each slot.
While a magnetic pole is formed with two coil turns in embodiment 3 described above, each magnetic pole is formed with the coil turned 2.5 times in embodiment 4. Namely, the coil is wound by 2.5 turns so as to achieve a circumferential angular width of 120° in electric angle (would over two teeth 21 in this example), thereby forming a first stator magnetic pole 91. Then, the coil is inserted through a slot set apart by 180° in electric angle (equivalent to three teeth 21) from the slot at which the coil has been most recently inserted at the first magnetic pole 91, and the coil is subsequently wound by 2.5 turns from the new slot along the direction opposite from the direction of the coil turns constituting the stator magnetic pole 91, thereby forming a stator magnetic pole 92. When the coil is wound with 2.5 turns, as in this case, the coil is inserted twice through one of the two slots at which the coil is housed and the coil is inserted three times through the other slot. In embodiment 4, the coil ends of the coils corresponding to all the phases can be disposed evenly on both sides and thus, the coil ends do not become excessively large. While the coils are wound with 2.5 turns in this example, the present embodiment may be adopted in conjunction with coils wound with turns made up with full turns and a half turn.
It is to be noted that a total of five coil segments are inserted through each slot in embodiment 4. The present embodiment can be adopted in applications in which an odd number of coil segments are inserted through each slot.
While the forward winding coil (stator magnetic pole 91) and the reverse winding coil (stator magnetic pole 92) are formed with a single coil wire in embodiments 3 and 4 described above, the forward winding coil and the reverse winding coil in embodiment 5 are constituted with separate coil wires. Namely, the U-phase coil 31 is constituted with a forward winding coil 311 and a reverse winding coil 312, the V-phase coil 32 is constituted with a forward winding coil 321 and a reverse winding coil 322 and the W-phase coil 33 is constituted with a forward winding coil 331 and a reverse winding coil 332. It is to be noted that the U-phase coil 31, the V-phase coil 32 and the W-phase coil 33 are all wound in manners similar to one another.
A first stator magnetic pole 91 wound in the forward direction is formed by winding a coil so as to assume an angular width of 120° (over two teeth 21 in this example) in electric angle along the circumferential direction. Next, the coil is inserted through a slot set apart by 240° in electric angle (equivalent to four teeth 21) from the slot at which the coil has been most recently inserted in correspondence to the first magnetic pole 91, and the coil is then wound by two turns from the new slot along the direction matching the direction of the coil turns constituting the stator magnetic pole 91, thereby forming a second stator magnetic pole 91. Subsequently, all the remaining stator magnetic poles 91 are formed as described above.
Likewise, a first stator magnetic pole 92 wound in the reverse direction is formed by winding a coil along a direction opposite from the direction in which the coil is wound to form the stator magnetic poles 91 so as to range astride an angular width of 120° (over two teeth 21 in this example) in electric angle along the circumferential direction within a 240° range in electric angle surpassed by the forward winding coil, with a 180° shifting relative to the phase of the stator magnetic poles 91. Next, the coil is inserted through a slot set apart by 240° in electric angle (equivalent to four teeth 21) from the slot at which the coil has been most recently inserted in correspondence to the first magnetic pole 92, and the coil is then wound from the new slot along the direction matching the direction of the coil turns constituting the first stator magnetic pole 92, thereby forming a second stator magnetic pole 92. Subsequently, all the remaining stator magnetic poles 92 are formed as described above.
It is desirable that the forward winding coil and the reverse winding coil be connected in series. By connecting the forward winding coil and the reverse winding coil, the coil ends of all the coils corresponding to each phase can be set evenly on both sides so as to prevent the coil ends from becoming excessively large, so as to facilitate the coil winding process and thus assure better mass productivity.
It is to be noted that a total of four coil segments are inserted through each slot in embodiment 5. The present embodiment can be adopted in applications in which an even number of coil segments are inserted through each slot.
In addition to the structural features of embodiment 5 shown in
It is to be noted that a total of five coil segments are inserted through each slot in embodiment 6. The present embodiment can be adopted in applications in which an odd number of coil segments are inserted through each slot.
The winding structure in embodiment 7, too, includes forward winding coils and reverse winding coils that are independent of each other. A forward winding stator magnetic pole 91 is formed by winding two coils in a wave winding so as to assume an angular width of 120° in electric angle (over two teeth 21 in this example) along the circumferential direction. The coils are then inserted through a slot set apart by 240° in electric angle (by four teeth 21 in this example) from the slot where the coils have been most recently inserted, and the two coils are wound in a wave winding so that the two coils extend from the slot in a direction matching the direction of the coil turn constituting the stator magnetic pole 91.
Likewise, a reverse winding stator magnetic pole 92 is formed with two coils wound in a reverse wave winding so as to assume an angular width of 120° in electric angle along the circumferential direction with a phase of the two coils shifted by 180° relative to the phase of the forward winding stator magnetic pole 91 within a 240° electric angle range surpassed by the forward winding coils. Next, the two coils are inserted through a slot set apart by 240° in electric angle (by four teeth 21 in the example) and the two coils are wound in a reverse wave winding so that they extend from the slot with an angular width of 120° in electric angle along the circumferential direction. The coils are repeatedly wound as described above so as to form reverse winding stator magnetic poles 92. While the two coils may be connected to each other in parallel or in series, it is desirable that the forward winding coils and the reverse winding coils be connected in series. Through these measures, coil ends of the coils corresponding to all the phases can be disposed evenly on both sides and thus, coil ends do not become excessively large. In addition, the wave winding pattern adopted in the embodiment allows the coils to be wound with better ease and thus, outstanding mass productivity is assured.
It is to be noted that a total of four coil segments are inserted through each slot in embodiment 7. The present embodiment can be adopted in applications in which an even number of coil segments are inserted through each slot.
In addition to the structural features of embodiment 7 shown in
It is to be noted that a total of five coil segments are inserted through each slot in embodiment 8. The present embodiment can be adopted in applications in which an odd number of coil segments are inserted through each slot.
Embodiment 9 is achieved by modifying embodiment 7 shown in
It is to be noted that a total of four coil segments are inserted through each slot in embodiment 9. The present embodiment can be adopted in applications in which an even number of coil segments are inserted through each slot.
The embodiment features a structure achieved by combining the dispersal winding structure described above and a double three-phase structure. Namely, two winding assemblies, each wound as shown in
Embodiment 11 also features a winding assembly constituting a three-phase system A and a winding assembly constituting a three-phase system B. It is desirable that the winding assembly in the three-phase system A and the winding assembly in the three-phase system B be electric circuit elements equivalent to each other. By constituting the winding assemblies with electric circuit elements equivalent to each other, the higher harmonics in the electromagnetic forces can be effectively reduced and since uniform currents can be output from the generator, ripples in the combined output current can be minimized.
Accordingly, coils to be wound along the circumferential direction are oriented diagonally with an offset along the radial direction, as shown in
While
By adopting the dispersal winding structure in a double three-phase system and setting a phase difference between the two three-phase systems A and B at 30° or close to 30° in electric angle, as in this embodiment, a sixth-order time higher harmonic component related to the electromagnetic force can be effectively reduced and thus, the noise of the generator can be significantly reduced.
As described above, in each three-phase coil system constituted with U-phase coils, V-phase coils and W-phase coils, the forward winding coil and the reverse winding coil corresponding to each phase are wound over different numbers of teeth. Since the quantity of teeth does not need to be doubled, the coils can be wound with better ease in the present embodiment.
If the two three-phase systems are set with shifting of 20° relative to each other, the sixth-order time higher harmonic component in electromagnetic excitation force can be reduced by 25% ((1+cos(6×20°))/2=0.25), and if they are shifted by 40° relative to each other, the sixth-order time higher harmonic component in electromagnetic excitation force can also be reduced by 25% ((1+cos(6×40°))/2=0.25). This means that as long as the two three-phase systems are disposed shifting in the 20 through 40° range, the sixth-order time higher harmonic component in electromagnetic excitation force can be reduced by 25% or better.
Any of the embodiments described above may be adopted in a rotating electrical machine such as a motor or a generator used in a wide range of applications, including electrical power machine applications, industrial applications, home appliance applications and automotive applications. Any of the embodiments of the present invention may be successfully adopted in diverse fields of application as large-scale rotating electrical machine units such as wind-power generators, automotive drive sources, power generating rotating electrical machines and industrial rotating electrical machines, as medium-scale rotating electrical machines including industrial units and auxiliary units in automobiles, and as small rotating electrical machine units used in home appliances, office equipment and the like.
The present invention may be adopted in a generator, as described in reference to the following embodiments. By assuming the double three-phase system structure described above, a desirable electrical current can be generated with minimum ripple.
Next, the power generation operation is described. An engine (not shown) and the vehicular AC generator 100 are normally linked with each other via a belt. The pulley 101 at the vehicular AC generator 100 is connected to the engine side through the belt, and the rotor 1 rotates together with the engine. As an electrical current flows through the field winding 112 disposed at the center of the claw poles 113 at the rotor 1, the claw poles 113 become magnetized. As the rotor 1 rotates in this state, a three-phase induced electromotive force is generated at the stator winding. The voltage of the electromotive force thus generated undergoes full wave rectification at the rectifier circuit 111 mentioned earlier and thus, a DC voltage is generated. The positive side of the DC voltage is connected to the terminal 106 and is further connected to a battery (not shown). Although a detailed description is not provided, the field current is controlled so as to ensure that the DC voltage resulting from the rectification achieves a level optimal for battery charge.
In
It is to be noted that while a star connection is adopted in the examples described above, the present invention may be adopted in conjunction with a Δ connection. The A connection is more advantageous in that the coil induced voltage can be raised by 11.5% over the voltage induced in the star connection.
It is to be noted that the present invention having been described above in reference to the various embodiments may be summarized as follows. Namely, it may be embodied as a generator comprising a stator that includes stator coils through which electrical currents in a single three-phase AC system flow, teeth, around which the stator coils are wound and a core back that induces reflux of a magnetic flux flowing through the teeth, and a rotor that includes magnetic poles facing opposite the teeth. Stator coils wound at a given tooth in the stator are a U-phase coil and a V-phase coil alone, a V-phase coil and a W-phase coil alone or a W-phase coil and a U-phase coil alone.
In addition, the present invention may be embodied as a generator comprising a stator that includes stator coils through which electrical currents in a single three-phase AC system flow, teeth, around which the stator coils are wound and a core back that induces a reflux of a magnetic flux flowing through the teeth, and a rotor that includes magnetic poles facing opposite the teeth. In the generator, a concentrated winding coil system constituted with a U-phase coil, a V-phase coil and a W-phase coil is disposed at the teeth at a position further outward along the radial direction, a concentrated winding coil system constituted with a U-phase coil, a V-phase coil and a W-phase coil wound along a direction opposite from the direction in which the coils are wound in the first concentrated winding coil system is disposed at the teeth at a position further inward along the radial direction, and coils corresponding to each phase in the two concentrated winding coil systems are connected in series.
Furthermore, it may be embodied as a generator that includes two three-phase coil systems each made up with a U-phase coil, a V-phase coil and a W-phase coil, with the two coil systems disposed with a phase difference equivalent to approximately 30° in electric angle or an angle within a range of 20° through 40° in electric angle.
While the circuits shown in
The modifications made in the winding structure as described earlier are not the sole measures for lowering the resistance at a stator coil for purposes of reducing the ohmic loss. Namely, the stator coil resistance can be effectively reduced by increasing the coil sectional area within the slots.
In the example presented in
In the second example presented in
At a stator core 600 shown in
Once the coil 603 is inserted into the slot 602, as shown in
The embodiments described above may be adopted singularly or in combination to realize a singular advantage or combined advantages. In addition, as long as the features characterizing the present invention are not compromised, the present invention is not limited to any of the specific structural particulars described herein, in reference to the embodiments.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/JP2009/054681 | 3/11/2009 | WO | 00 | 11/1/2011 |