A field of the invention is microdischarge devices and arrays.
Microcavity plasma devices produce a nonequilibrium, low temperature plasma within, and essentially confined to, a cavity having a characteristic dimension d below approximately 500 μm. This new class of plasma devices exhibits several properties that differ substantially from those of conventional, macroscopic plasma sources. Because of their small physical dimensions, microcavity plasmas normally operate at gas (or vapor) pressures considerably higher than those accessible to macroscopic devices. For example, microplasma devices with a cylindrical microcavity having a diameter of 200-300 μm (or less) are capable of operation at rare gas (as well as N2 and other gases tested to date) pressures up to and beyond one atmosphere.
Such high pressure operation is advantageous. An example advantage is that, at these higher pressures, the plasma chemistry favors the formation of several families of electronically-excited molecules, including the rare gas dimers (Xe2, Kr2, Ar2, . . . ) and the rare gas-halides (such as XeCl, ArF, and Kr2F) that are known to be efficient emitters of ultraviolet (UV), vacuum ultraviolet (VUV), and visible radiation. This characteristic, in combination with the ability of microplasma devices to operate in a wide range of gases or vapors (and combinations thereof), offers emission wavelengths extending over a broad spectral range. Furthermore, operation of the plasma in the vicinity of atmospheric pressure minimizes the pressure differential across the packaging material when a microplasma device or array is sealed.
Early microplasma devices were driven by direct current (DC) voltages and exhibited short lifetimes for several reasons, including sputtering damage to the metal electrodes. Improvements in device design and fabrication have extended lifetimes significantly, but minimizing the cost of materials and the manufacture of large arrays continue to be key considerations.
An AC, rf, or pulse-excited microdischarge device and array are provide by the invention. A preferred array includes a substrate. A plurality of microdischarge cavities that contain discharge medium are in the substrate. A transparent layer seals the discharge medium in the microdischarge cavites. Electrodes stimulate the discharge medium. The microdischarge cavities are physically isolated from the electrodes by dielectric and arranged relative to the electrodes such that ac, rf, or pulsed excitation applied to the electrodes stimulates plasma excitation of the discharge medium. The microdischarge cavities are sized to produce plasma within the microdischarge cavities.
Embodiments of the invention concern an AC, rf, or pulse-excited microdischarge device and array. A preferred array includes a substrate. A plurality of microdischarge cavities that contain discharge medium are in the substrate. A transparent layer seals the discharge medium in the microdischarge cavites. Electrodes stimulate the discharge medium. The microdischarge cavities are physically isolated from the electrodes by dielectric and arranged relative to the electrodes such that ac, rf, or pulsed excitation applied to the electrodes stimulates plasma excitation of the discharge medium. The microdischarge cavities are sized to produce plasma within the microdischarge cavities.
The invention will now be illustrated by discussing several preferred embodiment devices. In describing the invention, particular exemplary devices, formation processes, and device applications will be used for purposes of illustration. Dimensions and illustrated devices may be exaggerated for purposes of illustration and understanding of the invention. The elements of the drawings are not necessarily to scale relative to one another. Schematic views will be understood by artisans as such views are commonly used in the art. Devices and arrays of the invention may be fabricated by processes well known to the semiconductor device and MEMs communities.
Referring now to
An example prototype array is composed of 100 μm dia. microdischarge pixels. The visible light is produced by an ac discharge in neon gas in each microcavity and pairs of excitation electrodes can be seen in each of the microdischarges.
Referring again to
Each microcavity 12 is formed in another substrate 34, for example, a dielectric material for electrically isolating each microcavity 12 from others. The dielectric substrate 34 is essentially transparent at a frequency of interest, namely, the frequency for phase locking. The transparency of the material of 34 may extend over a wavelength range encompassing two or more wavelengths produced by the microdischarges (output of the microdischarge cavities 12), thereby allowing two or more wavelengths to be phase-locked. Alternatively, substrate 34 may be chosen so as to be essentially transparent at only one wavelength. Thus, substrate 34 isolates each microdischarge electrically but couples the microdischarges optically at least one wavelength.
A transparent top window 35 fabricated from a layer of transparent material such as glass or quartz, is bonded or otherwise sealed to the substrate 34. The bottom electrodes 16, 18 produce an electric field that excites the vapor or gas discharge medium 36 contained within the microdischarge cavities 12. The window, i.e., fabricated from a substance transparent to the wavelength(s) of interest, 35 seals the discharge medium 36—a vapor or gas—in the microdischarge cavities 12. Application of power to the electrodes 16, 18 results in optical emissions from the discharge medium 36. If individual control of various microdischarge cavities 12 is not desired, common electrodes, such as electrodes 16, 18, are used to excite discharges in the microdischarge cavities 12, while multiple electrode pair embodiments may provide individual control, such as selective excitation of only rings 20 and 24.
The lower size limit of the diameter of the microdischarge cavities 12 in which the microdischarges are generated is limited primarily by the microfabrication techniques used to form the microdischarge cavities. Although the microdischarge cavities (for the prototype phased arrays produced to date) are cylindrical and have typical diameters of 75 or 100 μm, fabricating microplasma devices of much smaller (<10 μm) or larger sizes is straightforward with well-known microfabrication techniques. Also, the cross-section of the individual microdischarge devices need not be circular, though that is the shape of the microdischarge cavities 12 in the exemplary embodiment of
The size(s) of the individual devices and the overall array are determined by several considerations. To achieve phase-locked operation, the spacing between individual microdischarge devices and the cross-sectional dimensions of each device must be smaller than the coherence length of at least one of the radiative emission lines to be produced in the microdischarge array. The microdischarge devices may produce radiation at many disparate wavelengths and the array may be designed so as to phase lock radiation of a particular wavelength or a range in wavelengths.
One factor that determines the response of the array is the discharge medium 36 in the microdischarge cavities 12. Microdischarge devices operating in neon gas, for example, produce strong emission in the red region of the visible and weaker emission in the ultraviolet.
The material of the substrate 34 also impacts the response of the array. This may be used to control the wavelength of the phase-locked response of the array. For example, the array may be designed to achieve phase-locking in the red but not the ultraviolet. Phase-locking requires that the individual microdischarges (in microdischarge cavities 12) be optically coupled at the wavelength of interest. One way to accomplish this is to fabricate the microdischarge array in a material that is optically transmissive at the wavelength of interest. This allows optical radiation at the desired wavelength to pass from one microdischarge device and into an adjacent device.
Another approach is to cap the microdischarge array with a surface having a grating structure that optically couples at least two of the microdischarge cavities 12. The grating structure deflects radiation of a particular wavelength (or range of wavelengths), produced in one microdischarge device, into surrounding devices.
Another design consideration concerns preferred embodiment arrays arranged in a particular spatial configuration, a Fresnel pattern. If focusing of the light emerging from an array is desired, the microdischarge pixels can be disposed in rings. The radius of each ring is given by the expression
ρ=√{square root over (2nλb+n2b2)} (1)
where b is the desired focal length of the Fresnel array, n is the order (number) of the ring and λ is the wavelength of the light. It should be noted that the performance of the Fresnel lens improves with an increasing number of rings but we have found that skipping rings to obtain a larger spacing between rings of pixels also yields Fresnel structures that work well. From eqn. (1), it is clear that constructing active (microdischarge) Fresnel structures is most difficult at short wavelengths (λ) and with small focal lengths.
The small size of the microdischarge cavities, and the ability to pack the microdischarge cavities close together effectively creates point sources of radiation within a single coherence length of other adjacent microdischarge cavities. This provides the basis for a phased response of the array.
The type of discharge medium used in the microdischarge cavities 12 can alter the nature of the display. Discharge media in exemplary embodiments include a wide variety of vapors and gases such as the atomic rare gases, N2, and the rare gas-halide molecules (i.e., rare gas-halogen donor gas mixtures). Each of the microdischarges is operated at pressures up to and beyond one atmosphere. Fabrication and the operation of microdischarges are discussed in the following U.S. patents that are incorporated by reference herein: U.S. Pat. No. 6,563,257 entitled Multilayer ceramic microdischarge device; U.S. Pat. No. 6,194,833 entitled Microdischarge lamp and array; U.S. Pat. No. 6,139,384 entitled Microdischarge lamp formation process; and U.S. Pat. No. 6,016,027 entitled Microdischarge lamp.
Referring now to
While specific embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described, it should be understood that other modifications, substitutions and alternatives are apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art. Such modifications, substitutions and alternatives can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention, which should be determined from the appended claims.
Various features of the invention are set forth in the appended claims.
This application is a continuation of and claims the benefit of the filing date under 35 U.S.C. 120 of prior related application Ser. No. 10/829,666, entitled Phase Locked Microdischarge Array and AC, RF or Pulse Excited Microdischarge, which was filed on Apr. 22, 2004 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,372,202.
This invention was made with Government assistance under U.S. Air Force Office of Scientific Research grant No. F49620-00-1-0372. The Government has certain rights in this invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3811061 | Nakayama et al. | May 1974 | A |
4367554 | Schlossberg | Jan 1983 | A |
4475060 | Aboelfotoh | Oct 1984 | A |
4720706 | Stine | Jan 1988 | A |
4803402 | Raber et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4843281 | Mendelsohn | Jun 1989 | A |
4956577 | Parker | Sep 1990 | A |
5132811 | Iwaki et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5723945 | Schermerhorn | Mar 1998 | A |
5984747 | Bhagavatula et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6016027 | DeTemple et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6043604 | Horiuchi et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6194833 | DeTemple et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6456007 | Ryu et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6695664 | Eden et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6867548 | Eden et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
7026640 | Nathan et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7511426 | Eden et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
20020030437 | Shimizu et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20030080688 | Eden et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030173900 | Inan et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20060038490 | Eden et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060071598 | Eden et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060084262 | Qin | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20070108910 | Eden et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070114929 | Son | May 2007 | A1 |
20080018248 | Jung et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080116805 | Song | May 2008 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
D.G. Youmans, “Phase Locking of Adjacent Channel Leaky Waveguide CO2 Lasers”, Appl. Phys. Lett. 44(4), Feb. 15, 1984, pp. 365-367. |
L.A. Newman, R.A. Hart, J.T. Kennedy, A.J. Cantor, A.J. DeMaria, “High Power Coupled CO2 Waveguide Laser Array”, Appl. Phys. Lett. 48 (25), Jun. 23, 1986, pp. 1701-1703. |
J.E. Ripper, T.L. Paoli, “Optical Coupling of Adjacent Stripe-Geometry Junction Lasers”, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 17, No. 9, Nov. 1, 1970, pp. 371-373. |
J. Katz, S. Margalit, A. Yariv, “Diffraction Coupled Phase-Locked Semiconductor Laser Array”, Appl. Phys. Lett. 42 (7), Apr. 1, 1983, pp. 554-556. |
M. Oka, H. Masuda, Y. Kaneda, S. Kubota, “Laser-Diode-Pumped Phase-Locked Nd:YAG Laser Arrays”, IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics, vol. 28, No. 4, Apr. 1992, pp. 1142-1147. |
Sung-Jin Park, Jack Chen, Clark J. Wagner, Chang Liu, J. Gary Eden, “Microdischarge Arrays: A New Family of Photonic Devices”, IEEE Journal on Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics, vol. 8, No. 1, Jan./Feb. 2002, pp. 139-147. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090128031 A1 | May 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10829666 | Apr 2004 | US |
Child | 11899083 | US |