This application relates to the field of automatic stabilization of a vessel, particularly by using stabilization fins rotated by a servo motor hydraulic unit controlled by a central stabilization controller.
Traditionally, motion control devices for marine vessels, such as fin roll stabilizers, have been powered hydraulically. In this application, hydraulics offer distinct advantages over other methods of providing power, such as electric motors. For instance, hydraulic actuators, or cylinders, can deliver a tremendous amount of force in a relatively small package, with little to no backlash or physical wear.
The drawbacks of traditional hydraulic systems are numerous. First, traditional hydraulic systems require numerous components and large plumbing systems spread out about the vessel, especially when multiple fin stabilizers are used. These systems must be fitted to the engine or generator's power take off, or to separate electric motors. A reservoir must be installed to supply the hydraulic pumps with fluid. The fluid must be clean and kept from overheating, so filters and a cooling system must be installed. An intricate network of hoses and pipes must be maintained to keep hydraulic fluid flowing to and from each and every hydraulic system component and consumer. With so many components, these systems can be costly to acquire and install, and need to be continually and carefully maintained.
The alternative to traditional hydraulic systems has been the use of electric motors to rotate the fins either directly or through a reduction gear. Direct drive motors are necessarily rather large due to the high torque requirements of a fin stabilizer. Adding a reduction gear between the motor and the fin can reduce the size requirement of the motor, but at the expense of the gear arrangement being subject to wear and backlash. In either case, the motors would be at risk of overheating and would require a cooling system.
In order to combine the benefits and eliminate the drawbacks of both systems, the present invention provides a new method of powering ship motion control equipment. The invention utilizes a number of AC servo motor driven hydraulic pumps with integrated reservoirs in compact, self-contained packages, with no expensive plumbing to install. The units mount on or near the fin actuation methods. A closed loop hydraulic system is used, requiring far less hydraulic fluid than traditional open loop hydraulic systems.
The units are designed to operate only when commanded. When stabilization is paused, and between fin movement commands, the AC motor and hydraulic pump stop. This is in contrast to traditional hydraulic systems, which continuously run regardless of whether the system is being utilized. This results in an energy efficient solution with far less heat generation than a traditional system. Accordingly, there is no need for a cooling system, and fluid filtration can be integrated within the unit.
As the vessel beings to move due to waves, wakes, or swells in the water, a motion sensor detects the angle and the rate of motion of the vessel. A signal is sent from the motion sensor to a stabilization controller. The stabilization controller processes the data and determines an appropriate corrective fin response. A command is then sent to the appropriate AC servo motor hydraulic units. The command is received in-unit by the AC servo controller, which sends the required direction and speed commands to the AC motor. The AC motor turns the pump to produce the necessary pressure and flow of hydraulic fluid to extend or retract one or more hydraulic actuators or cylinders. This displaces the tiller arm associated with the AC servo motor hydraulic unit, and in turn rotates the fin.
The present invention offers many unique advantages over the prior art, including, but not limited to those described herein. First, the present invention has built in redundancy, unlike a stabilizer powered by a central hydraulic system. If one unit fails, the remaining unit(s) can continue functioning. If there is a failure in a central hydraulic system, all stabilizer function is disabled. Spare units can also be kept on board in the event of a problem, and to rotate units out of service for maintenance while underway with a minimal loss of motion control.
Second, the present invention provides environmental advantages over traditional solutions. In the event of a fluid leak, a traditional central hydraulic system's pipe or hose can expel nearly all the hydraulic fluid in the system in a very short amount of time. The compact, closed loop AC Servo Hydraulic Unit limits fluid loss to about a gallon, while an open loop central hydraulic system can lose 20 or 30 times that amount.
Third, the present invention is also much quieter than the prior art. A central hydraulic system transmits noise from the pump, the motor, and throughout the plumbing, making it difficult to contain. The AC Servo Hydraulic Unit, along with the fin actuator can be isolated in an enclosure, and/or noise damping material.
Fourth, the present invention also has the benefit of being very versatile. The hydraulic power units can be fitted with various size motors, pumps and reservoirs to meet the demand of the application, and configured to suit the available space.
Motion sensor 2 then communicates this motion information to stabilization controller 3. Stabilization controller 3 then determines the appropriate righting movements based on the information from motion sensor 2. In an embodiment of the invention, stabilization controller 3 also takes into account the present position fin 10, which is periodically reported by fin position sensor 11. In some embodiments of the invention, the fin's 10 rotational position are reported; in others, the fin's 10 linear position is reported. In embodiments of the invention, the fin's position is measured either directly or indirectly.
Stabilization controller 3 then sends the appropriate commands to actuate the movement of the fin to servo motor hydraulic assembly 4. Servo controller 5 receives the commands from stabilization controller 3 and in turn sends the appropriate command to start servo motor hydraulic unit 6. Servo motor hydraulic unit 6 causes a pressure change in hydraulic actuator 7, which activates fin movement assembly 8. Tiller arm 9 moves as a result of its communication with hydraulic actuator 7 and converts the linear movement of the hydraulic actuator 7 to a torque, which rotates fin 10.
In some embodiments of the invention, hydraulic actuator 7 comprises multiple hydraulic actuators which are in communication with fin movement assembly 8.
In some embodiments of the invention, fin position sensor 11 periodically determines the position of fin 10 and updates stabilization controller 3 and servo controller 5 with the position of fin 10. In some embodiments of the invention, when fin 10 reaches a desired position, stabilization controller 3 or servo controller 5 sends a command to halt further movement of fin 10.
Pump 15 is fed by integrated reservoir 19, and is in communication with valving 16 for shutoff, flushing and pressure relief. In some embodiments of the invention, servo motor hydraulic unit can be mounted via unit mounting base 14. In some embodiments of the invention, miscellaneous ports 22 and 23 can be configured to provide various functions.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2979010 | Braddon et al. | Apr 1961 | A |
3020869 | Beach | Feb 1962 | A |
3066634 | Suberkrub | Dec 1962 | A |
3618553 | Ehluss | Nov 1971 | A |
3924555 | Napolitano | Dec 1975 | A |
4380206 | Baitis et al. | Apr 1983 | A |
4388889 | Baitis | Jun 1983 | A |
4398486 | Woolaver et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4434739 | Brix et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
4449469 | Woolaver et al. | May 1984 | A |
4777899 | Bettcher, Jr. | Oct 1988 | A |
4919064 | Ehluss et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
5092801 | McBeth | Mar 1992 | A |
5150661 | Rudolf | Sep 1992 | A |
5427045 | Fetchko | Jun 1995 | A |
5488919 | Ferreiro | Feb 1996 | A |
5919064 | Petersen et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
6367400 | Niggemann et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6571724 | Shen | Jun 2003 | B1 |
7263942 | Dobashi et al. | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7364482 | Wong | Apr 2008 | B1 |
8534211 | Venables et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8583300 | Oehlgrien et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8794171 | Jauncey | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8840438 | Broughton | Sep 2014 | B2 |
20090282823 | Redfern | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20120132120 | Gai et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102336254 | Feb 2012 | CN |
1835181 | Sep 2007 | EP |
471220 | Aug 1937 | GB |
2235662 | Mar 1991 | GB |
03053775 | Jul 2003 | WO |
2014009372 | Jan 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority Application No. PCT/US2014/059263 Comleted: Dec. 11, 2014; dated Jan. 2, 2015 11 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180312229 A1 | Nov 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61886905 | Oct 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14507498 | Oct 2014 | US |
Child | 16029053 | US |