Patent Grant
8722072
The present invention relates to new active ingredient combinations composed of a known dihydrofuranone derivative on the one hand and of other known active pesticidal ingredients on the other hand, these combinations being extremely suitable for controlling animal pests, more particularly for controlling animal pests from the families of the Aleyrodidae, Thripidae, Psyllidae and Agromyzidae, and also, more particularly, from the order of the Acari.
It is already known that the dihydrofuranone derivative of the formula
can be used for controlling animal pests, such as insects and unwanted acarids (cf. EP-A-0528156, WO 00/42850, WO 06/002824, WO 07/115,686). The activity of this compound, while good, nevertheless leaves something to be desired in certain cases at low application rates.
Additionally known are mixtures of (I) with other insecticides and/or acaricides: for example, WO 00/56156, WO 01/60158, WO 01/70027, WO 01/76369, WO 01/78511, WO 01/72125, WO 05/048712, WO 05/065453, WO 07/098,852, DE-A-10342673.
It has now been found that active ingredient combinations comprising the dihydrofuranone derivative of the formula
and active ingredients from the IRAC classes of the sodium channel modulators/blockers and/or site I electron transport inhibitors and/or chloride channel activators, and/or inhibitors of magnesium-stimulated ATPase and/or bifenazate, are especially suitable for controlling animal pests from the families of the Aleyrodidae, Thripidae, Psyllidae and Agromyzidae, and also, more particularly, from the order of the Acari, in annual or perennial crops. Surprisingly, not only, in particular, is the insecticidal and/or acaricidal activity of the active ingredient combinations higher than the sum of the activities of the individual active ingredients, but also, unexpectedly, an improved preservation of beneficial species by the active ingredient combination is observed.
Particularly preferred are the active ingredient combinations comprising the compound of the formula (I) and at least one of the following compounds:
The active ingredient combinations comprise not only the active ingredient of the formula (I) but also at least one active ingredient from the compounds of the formulae (II) to (IX).
The present invention relates, furthermore, to a process for improving the utilization of the production potential of a transgenic plant, characterized in that the plant is treated with an effective amount of the active ingredient combinations of the invention. It is already known that the production potential of a transgenic plant can be improved through treatment with the compound of the formula (I) (WO 2009/132779). This activity is boosted through treatment with the active ingredient combinations of the invention.
The present invention additionally relates to new combinations which are composed of the aforementioned active ingredient combinations (also defined below as mixture(s)) on the one hand and beneficial species (natural enemies) on the other hand and which are extremely suitable for controlling animal pests such as insects and/or unwanted acarids, more particularly for controlling animal pests from the families of the Aleyrodidae, Thripidae, Psyllidae and Agromyzidae, and also, more particularly, from the order of the Acari.
It is already known, furthermore, that numerous beneficial species are used for controlling insects and spider mites: Knowing and recognizing; M. H. Malais, W. J. Ravensberg, published by Koppert B. V., Reed Business Information (2003). However, the use of beneficial species alone is not always satisfactory.
It is also already known that the dihydrofuranone derivative of the formula (I) exhibits improved insecticidal and acaricidal properties in combination with beneficial species—see, for example WO 07/144,087—and is recommended for IPM programmes.
It has now been found that active ingredient combinations (mixtures) comprising the compound of the formula (I) and a co-component of the formulae (II) to (IX), more particular of the formulae (VI) and (VII), especially co-components of the formula (VI), in proportions of 5:1 to 50:1, preferably 10:1 to 30:1, very preferably 20:1, can be employed in combination with beneficial species from the orders or suborders of the Araneae, Acari, Dermaptera, Hymenoptera, Coleoptera, Neuroptera, Thysanoptera, Heteroptera, Diptera, Hemiptera, Demiaptera and/or Parasitiformes, and possess very good insecticidal and/or acaricidal properties.
The insecticidal and/or acaricidal activity of the mixture/beneficial species combinations of the invention is, surprisingly, better than the activities of the mixture and of the beneficial species alone. There is an unforeseeable boost in effect. It has also been found that it is possible with mixture/beneficial species combinations to replace applications of old, toxicologically and/or environmentally objectionable active ingredients, with retention of a comparable activity, and this is beneficial above all to the safety of users and/or of the environment, and may even make it possible to reduce spray applications. The mixture/beneficial species combinations are employed by treating the plants or plant parts advantageously first with the mixtures of the invention, and thereafter applying the beneficial species.
The invention also provides a kit comprising the abovementioned active ingredient combinations and beneficial species.
The present invention relates, furthermore, to a process for improving the utilization of the production potential of a transgenic plant, characterized in that the plant is treated with an effective amount of the mixture/beneficial species combinations of the invention.
The mixture/beneficial species combinations of the invention comprise not only at least one of the abovementioned active ingredient combinations (mixtures) but also at least one beneficial species from the orders and suborders listed below.
The active ingredient combinations (mixtures) may, furthermore, also comprise other components with fungicidal, acaricidal or insecticidal activity.
When the active ingredients are present in particular weight proportions in the active ingredient combinations of the invention, the enhanced activity is manifested to a particularly marked extent. However, the weight proportions of the active ingredients in the active ingredient combinations can be varied within a relatively wide range. Generally speaking, the combinations of the invention comprise the active ingredient of the formula (I) and the co-component in the preferred and particularly preferred proportions indicated in the tables below:
Beneficial species contemplated include with particular preference those from the following families:
From the family of Eumenidae, particular preference is given to: Eumenes spp., Oplomerus spp., in crops such as, for example, pome fruit, stone fruit, vegetables, ornamental plants, conifers and spices.
From the family of Sphecidae, particular preference is given to: Ammophila sabulos, Cerceris arenaria, in crops such as, for example, pome fruit, stone fruit, vegetables, ornamental plants, conifers and spices.
From the family of Vespidae, particular preference is given to: Polistes spp. Vespa spp., Dolichovespula spp., Vespula spp., Paravespula spp., in crops such as, for example, pome fruit, stone fruit, vegetables, ornamental plants, conifers and spices.
From the family of Aphelinidae, particular preference is given to: Coccophagus spp., Encarsia spp., for example, Encarsia formosa, Aphytis spp., Aphelinus spp., for example, Aphelinus mali, Aphelinus abdominalis, Erelmocerus spp., for example, Erelmocerus erimicus, Erelmocerus mundus, Prospaltella spp., in crops such as, for example, pome fruit, stone fruit, vegetables, ornamental plants, conifers and spices.
From the family of Trichogrammatidae, particular preference is given to: Trichogramma spp., for example, Trichogamma brassicae, in crops such as, for example, pome fruit, stone fruit, vegetables, ornamental plants, conifers and spices.
From the family of Encyrtidae, particular preference is given to: Encyrtus fuscicollis, Aphidencyrtrus spp., in crops such as, for example, pome fruit, stone fruit, vegetables, ornamental plants, conifers, spices and afforestations.
From the family of Mymaridae, in crops such as, for example, pome fruit, stone fruit, vegetables, ornamental plants, conifers and spices.
From the family of Ichneumoidae, particular preference is given to: Coccigomymus spp. Diadegma spp., Glypta spp., Ophion spp., Pimpla spp., in crops such as, for example, pome fruit, stone fruit, vegetables, ornamental plants, conifers and spices.
From the family of Eulophidae, particular preference is given to: Dyglyphus spp., for example, Dyglyphus isaea, Eulophus viridula, Colpoclypeus florus, in crops such as, for example, pome fruit, stone fruit, vegetables, ornamental plants, conifers, maize and spices.
From the family of Alloxystidae, particular preference is given to: Alloxysta spp., in crops such as, for example, pome fruit, stone fruit, vegetables, ornamental plants, conifers and spices.
From the family of Megaspilidae, particular preference is given to: Dendrocerus spp., in crops such as, for example, pome fruit, stone fruit, vegetables, ornamental plants, conifers and spices.
From the family of Bracconidae, particular preference is given to: Aphidrus spp., Praon spp., Opius spp., Dacnusa spp., for example, Dacnusa sibiria, Apanteles spp., Ascogaster spp., Macrocentrus spp., in crops such as, for example, pome fruit, stone fruit, vegetables, ornamental plants, conifers and spices.
From the family of Aphidiidae, particular preference is given to: Aphidius spp., for example, Aphidius colemani, Aphidius ervi, Diaeretiella spp., Lysiphlebus spp., in crops such as, for example, pome fruit, stone fruit, vegetables, ornamental plants, conifers and spices.
From the family of Coccinellidae, particular preference is given to: Harmonia spp., Coccinella spp., for example, Coccinella septempunctata, Adalia spp., for example, Adalia bipunctata, Calvia spp., Chilocorus spp., for example, Chilocorus bipustulatus, Scymnus spp., Cryptolaemus montrouzieri, Exochomus spp., Stethorus spp., for example, Scymnus abietes, Scymnus interruptus, Anatis spp., Rhizobius spp., Thea spp., in crops such as, for example, pome fruit, stone fruit, vegetables, ornamental plants, conifers and spices.
From the family of Staphylernidae, particular preference is given to: Aleochara spp., Aligota spp., Philonthus spp., Staphylinus spp., in crops such as, for example, pome fruit, stone fruit, vegetables, ornamental plants, conifers and spices.
From the family of Chrysopidae, particular preference is given to: Chrysopa spp., for example, Chrysopa oculata, Chrysopa perla, Chrysopa carnea, Chrysopa flava, Chrysopa septempunctata, Chrysoperla spp., Chrysopidia spp., for example, Chrysopidia ciliata, Hypochrysa spp., for example, Hypochrysa elegans, in crops such as, for example, pome fruit, stone fruit, vegetables, ornamental plants, conifers and spices.
From the family of Hemerobiidae, particular preference is given to: Hemerobius spp., for example, Hemerobius fenestratus, Hemerobius humulinus, Hemerobius micans, Hemerobius nitidulus, Hemerobius pini, Wesmaelius spp., for example, Wesmaelius nervosus, in crops such as, for example, pome fruit, stone fruit, vegetables, ornamental plants, conifers and spices.
From the family of Anthocoridae, particular preference is given to: Anthocoris spp., for example, Anthocoris nemoralis, Anthocoris nemorum, Orius spp., for example, Orius majusculus, Orius minutus, Orius laevigatus, Orius insidiosus, Orius niger, Orius vicinus, in crops such as, for example, pome fruit, stone fruit, vegetables, ornamental plants, conifers and spices.
From the family of Miridae, particular preference is given to: Atractotomus spp., for example, Atractotomus mali, Blepharidopterus spp., for example, Blepharidopterus angulatus, Camylomma spp., for example, Camylomma verbasci, Deraeocoris spp., Macrolophus spp., for example, Macrolophus caliginosus, in crops such as, for example, cotton, pome fruit, stone fruit, vegetables, ornamental plants, conifers and spices.
From the family of Pentatomidae, particular preference is given to: Arma spp., Podisus spp., for example, Podisus maculiventris, in crops such as, for example, pome fruit, stone fruit, vegetables, ornamental plants, conifers and spices.
From the family of Nabidae, particular preference is given to: Nabis spp., for example, Nabis apterus, in crops such as, for example, pome fruit, stone fruit, vegetables, ornamental plants, conifers and spices.
From the family of Reduviidae, particular preference is given to: Empicornis vagabundus, Reduvius personatus, Rhinocoris spp., in crops such as, for example, pome fruit, stone fruit, vegetables, ornamental plants, conifers and spices.
From the family of Tachinidae, particular preference is given to: Bessa fugax, Cyzenius albicans, Compsileura concinnata, Elodia tragica, Exorista larvarum, Lyphia dubia, in crops such as, for example, pome fruit, stone fruit, vegetables, ornamental plants, conifers and spices.
From the family of Syrphidae, particular preference is given to: Dasysyrphus spp., Episyrphus balteatus, Melangyna triangulata, Melanostoma spp., Metasyrphus spp., Platycheirus spp., Syrphus spp., in crops such as, for example, pome fruit, stone fruit, vegetables, ornamental plants, conifers and spices.
From the family of Cecidomyiidae, particular preference is given to: Aphidoletes aphidimyza, Feltiella acarisuga, in crops such as, for example, pome fruit, stone fruit, vegetables, ornamental plants, conifers and spices.
From the family of Phytoseidae, particular preference is given to: Amblyseius spp., Thyphlodromus spp., Phytoseiulus spp., in crops such as pome fruit, stone fruit, vegetables, ornamental plants and spices.
The active ingredient combinations (mixtures) of the invention and also the mixture/beneficial species combinations of the invention combine good plant tolerance, favourable homeotherm toxicity and good environment compatibility with capacity for protection of plants and plant organs, for increasing harvest yields, for improving the quality of harvested produce, and for controlling animal pests, more particularly insects, arachnids, helminths, nematodes and molluscs which are prevalent in agriculture, in horticulture, in animal husbandry, in forests, in gardens and leisure facilities, in the protection of store houses and materials, and in the hygiene sector. They can be used with preference as crop protectants. They are effective against species with normal sensitivity and resistant species, and also against certain development stages or all development stages.
The pests referred to above include the following:
Pests from the phylum Arthropoda, more particularly from the subclass of the Acari, e.g. Acarus spp., Aceria sheldoni, Aculops spp., Aculus spp., Amblyomma spp., Amphitetranychus viennensis, Argas spp., Boophilus spp., Brevipalpus spp., Bryobia praetiosa, Chorioptes spp., Dermanyssus gallinae, Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus, Dermatophagoides farinae, Dermacentor spp., Eotetranychus spp., Epitrimerus pyri, Eutetranychus spp., Eriophyes spp., Halotydeus destructor, Hemitarsonemus spp., Hyalomma spp., Ixodes spp., Metatetranychus spp., Nuphersa spp., Oligonychus spp., Ornithodorus spp., Ornithonyssus spp., Panonychus spp., Phyllocoptruta oleivora, Polyphagotarsonemus latus, Psoroptes spp., Rhipicephalus spp., Rhizoglyphus spp., Sarcoptes spp., Steneotarsonemus spp., Steneotarsonemus spinki, Tarsonemus spp., Tetranychus spp., Vasates lycopersici.
From the order of the Homoptera, more particularly from the family of the Aleyrodidae, e.g. Aleyrodes proletella, Aleurolobus barodensis, Aleurothrixus floccosus, Bemisia tabaci, Dialeurodes citri, Parabemisia myricae, Siphoninus phillyreae, Trialeurodes vaporariorum and from the family of Psyllidae, e.g. Acizzia acaciaebaileyanae, Acizzia dodonaeae, Acizzia uncatoides, Agonoscena spp., Allocaridara malayensis, Arytainilla spp., Blastopsylla occidentalis, Boreioglycaspis melaleucae, Cacopsylla spp., Cryptoneossa spp., Ctenarytaina spp., Diaphorina citri, Eucalyptolyma spp., Euphyllura spp., Glycaspis spp., Heteropsylla cubana, Heteropsylla spinulosa, Pachypsylla spp., Prosopidopsylla flava, Psyllopsis spp., Psylla spp. and Tetragonocephela spp.
From the order of the Thysanoptera, more particularly form the family of the Thriphidae, e.g. Anaphothrips obscurus, Baliothrips biformis, Drepanothrips reuteri, Frankliniella spp., Heliothrips spp., Hercinothrips femoralis, Rhipiphorothrips cruentatus, Scirtothrips spp., Taeniothrips cardamomi and Thrips spp.
From the order of the Diptera, more particularly from the family of the Agromyzidae, e.g. Agromyza spp., Liriomyza spp., and Tipula spp.
In annual crops such as, for example, vegetables, melons, ornamental plants, maize, soya, cotton, and also in perennial plants, such as, for example, citrus, pome fruit and stone fruit, spices, conifers and other ornamental plants, and also in afforestations.
The crops to be protected which have only been described in general terms are described in greater detail and specified hereinbelow. Thus, as regards the use, vegetables are understood as meaning for example fruiting vegetables and inflorescences as vegetables, for example bell peppers, chilies, tomatoes, aubergines, cucumbers, pumpkins, courgettes, broad beans, climbing and dwarf beans, peas, artichokes; but also leafy vegetables, for example head-forming lettuce, chicory, endives, various types of cress, of rocket, lamb's lettuce, iceberg lettuce, leeks, spinach, Swiss chard;
As regards the use, ornamentals are understood as meaning annual and perennial plants, for example cut flowers such as, for example, roses, carnations, gerbera, lilies, marguerites, chrysanthemums, tulips, narcissus, anemones, poppies, amaryllis, dahlias, azaleas, hibiscus,
As regards the use, spices are understood as meaning annual and perennial plants such as, for example, aniseed, chili pepper, paprika, pepper, vanilla, marjoram, thyme, cloves, juniper berries, cinnamon, tarragon, coriander, saffron, ginger.
In accordance with the invention all plants and plant parts can be treated. By plants here are meant all plants and plant populations, such as desirable and unwanted wild plants or crop plants (including naturally occurring crop plants). Crop plants may be plants which are obtainable by conventional breeding and optimization methods or by biotechnological and gene-technology methods or by combinations of these methods, including the transgenic plants and including plant varieties which may or may not be protectable by varietal property rights or plant breeder's rights. By plant parts are meant all above-ground and below-ground parts and organs of the plants, such as shoot, leaf, blossom and root, including for example leaves, needles, stems, branches, blossoms, fruiting bodies, fruits and seeds, and also roots, corms and rhizomes. The plant parts also include harvested produce, and also vegetative and generative propagation material, examples being cuttings, corms, rhizomes, runners and seeds.
The treatment, in accordance with the invention, of the plants and plant parts with the active ingredient combinations or mixture/beneficial species combinations takes place directly or by action on their environment, habitat or storage area, in accordance with the typical methods of treatment, as for example by dipping, spraying, vaporizing, fogging, scattering, brush application, injection, and, in the case of propagation material, especially in the case of seeds, additionally by coating with one or more coats.
As already mentioned above, it is possible in accordance with the invention to treat all plants and their parts. In one preferred embodiment, plant species and plant cultivars occurring in the wild or obtained by conventional biological breeding methods, such as crossing or protoplast fusion, and also parts of such plants, are treated. In another preferred embodiment, transgenic plants and plant cultivars obtained by gene-technology methods, optionally in combination with conventional methods, i.e. genetically modified organisms, and parts thereof are treated. The terms “parts” or “parts of plants” or “plant parts” is elucidated above.
With particular preference, plants treated in accordance with the invention are those of the respective plant cultivars in use or commercially standard plant cultivars. By plant cultivars are meant plants having new properties (“traits”), which have been bred alternatively by conventional breeding, by mutagenesis or by recombinant DNA techniques. These may be varieties, biotypes and genotypes.
Depending on the plant species or plant cultivars, their location and growth conditions (soils, climate, vegetation period, nutrition), the treatment according to the invention may also result in superadditive (“synergistic”) effects. Thus, for example, reduced application rates and/or widening of the activity spectrum, and/or a boost in the activity of the compounds and compositions that can be used in accordance with the invention, better plant growth, increased tolerance towards high or low temperatures, increased tolerance to drought or to rain content or soil salt content, increased flowering performance, easier harvesting, accelerated maturation, higher harvest yields, higher quality and/or higher nutritional value on the part of the harvested products, longer storage life and/or better processability of the harvested products, are possible, and exceed the effects which could actually have been expected.
The preferred transgenic plants or plant cultivars (i.e., those obtained by gene technology) for treatment in accordance with the invention include all plants obtained by the gene-technology modification of genetic material that endows these plants with particular advantageous valuable properties (“traits”). Examples of such properties are better plant growth, increased tolerance towards high or low temperatures, increased tolerance to drought or to rain content or soil salt content, increased flowering performance, easier harvesting, accelerated maturation, higher harvest yields, higher quality and/or higher nutritional value on the part of the harvested products, longer storage life and/or better processability of the harvested products. Further and particularly emphasized examples of such properties are an increased defence of the plants against animal and microbial pests, such as against insects, mites, phytopathogenic fungi, bacteria and/or viruses, and also increased tolerance by the plants of certain active herbicidal ingredients. Examples of transgenic plants include the major crop plants, such as cereals (wheat, rice), maize, soya, potatoes, cotton, tobacco, oilseed rape, and also fruit plants (with the fruits apples, pears, citrus fruits and grapes), with particular emphasis being given to maize, soya, potatoes, cotton, tobacco and oilseed rape. Traits that are particularly emphasized are the increased defence of the plants against insects, arachnids, nematodes and molluscs, by means of toxins produced in the plants, more particularly those produced in the plants by the genetic material from Bacillus thuringiensis (e.g. by the genes CryIA(a), CryIA(b), CryIA(c), CryIIA, CryIIIA, CryIIIB2, Cry9c Cry2Ab, Cry3Bb and CryIF, and also combinations thereof) (hereinafter “Bt plants”). Also particularly emphasized as traits are the increased defence of plants against fungi, bacteria and viruses through systemic acquired resistance (SAR), systemin, phytoalexins, elicitors and also resistance genes, and proteins and toxins expressed accordingly. Further traits that are parituclalry emphasized are the increased tolerance by the plants with respect to certain active herbicidal ingredients, examples being imida-zolinones, sulphonylureas, glyphosates or phosphinotricin (e.g. “PAT” gene). The genes in question which impart the desired traits may also occur in combinations with one another in the transgenic plants. Examples of “Bt plants” include maize varieties, cotton varieties, soya varieties and potato varieties which are sold under the trade names YIELD GARD® (e.g. maize, cotton, soya), KnockOut® (e.g. maize), StarLink® (e.g. maize), Bollgard® (cotton), Nucotn® (cotton) and NewLeaf® (potatoes). Examples of herbicide-tolerant plants include maize varieties, cotton varities and soya varieties which are sold under the trade names Roundup Ready® (glyphosate tolerance, e.g. maize, cotton, soya), Liberty Link® (phosphinotricin tolerance, e.g. oilseed rape), IMI® (tolerance towards imidazolinones) and STS® (tolerance towards sulphonylureas, e.g. maize). Herbicide-resistant plants (bred conventionally for herbicide tolerance) also include the varieties (e.g. maize) sold under the Clearfield® name. It will be appreciated that these remarks also apply to plant cultivars which will be developed or come onto the market in the future and which have the aforementioned genetic properties (“traits”) or such properties/traits to be developed in the future.
According to the invention all plants and plant parts can be treated. By plants is meant all plants and plant populations such as desirable and undesirable wild plants, cultivars and plant varieties (whether or not protectable by plant variety or plant breeder's rights). Cultivars and plant varieties can be plants obtained by conventional propagation and breeding methods which can be assisted or supplemented by one or more biotechnological methods such as by use of double haploids, protoplast fusion, random and directed mutagenesis, molecular or genetic markers or by bioengineering and genetic engineering methods. By plant parts is meant all above ground and below ground parts and organs of plants such as shoot, leaf, blossom and root, whereby for example leaves, needles, stems, branches, blossoms, fruiting bodies, fruits and seed as well as roots, corms and rhizomes are listed. Crops and vegetative and generative propagating material, for example cuttings, corms, rhizomes, runners and seeds also belong to plant parts.
Among the plants that can be protected by the method according to the invention, mention may be made of major field crops like corn, soybean, cotton, Brassica oilseeds such as Brassica napus (e.g. canola), Brassica rapa, B. juncea (e.g. mustard) and Brassica carinata, rice, wheat, sugarbeet, sugarcane, oats, lye, barley, millet, triticale, flax, vine and various fruits and vegetables of various botanical taxa such as Rosaceae sp. (for instance pip fruit such as apples and pears, but also stone fruit such as apricots, cherries, almonds and peaches, berry fruits such as strawberries), Ribesioidae sp., Juglandaceae sp., Betulaceae sp., Anacardiaceae sp., Fagaceae sp., Moraceae sp., Oleaceae sp., Actinidaceae sp., Lauraceae sp., Musaceae sp. (for instance banana trees and plantings), Rubiaceae sp. (for instance coffee), Theaceae sp., Sterculiceae sp., Rutaceae sp. (for instance lemons, oranges and grapefruit); Solanaceae sp. (for instance tomatoes, potatoes, peppers, eggplant), Liliaceae sp., Compositiae sp. (for instance lettuce, artichoke and chicory—including root chicory, endive or common chicory), Umbelliferae sp. (for instance carrot, parsley, celery and celeriac), Cucurbitaceae sp. (for instance cucumber—including pickling cucumber, squash, watermelon, gourds and melons), Alliaceae sp. (for instance onions and leek), Cruciferae sp. (for instance white cabbage, red cabbage, broccoli, cauliflower, brussel sprouts, pak Choi, kohlrabi, radish, horseradish, cress, Chinese cabbage), Leguminosae sp. (for instance peanuts, peas and beans—such as climbing beans and broad beans), Chenopodiaceae sp. (for instance mangold, spinach beet, spinach, beetroots), Malvaceae (for instance okra), Asparagaceae (for instance asparagus); horticultural and forest crops; ornamental plants; as well as genetically modified homologues of these crops.
The method of treatment according to the invention can be used in the treatment of genetically modified organisms (GMOs), e.g. plants or seeds. Genetically modified plants (or transgenic plants) are plants of which a heterologous gene has been stably integrated into the genome. The expression “heterologous gene” essentially means a gene which is provided or assembled outside the plant and when introduced in the nuclear, chloroplastic or mitochondrial genome gives the transformed plant new or improved agronomic or other properties by expressing a protein or polypeptide of interest or by downregulating or silencing other gene(s) which are present in the plant (using for example, antisense technology, cosuppression technology or RNA interference—RNAi-technology). A heterologous gene that is located in the genome is also called a transgene. A transgene that is defined by its particular location in the plant genome is called a transformation or transgenic event.
Depending on the plant species or plant cultivars, their location and growth conditions (soils, climate, vegetation period, diet), the treatment according to the invention may also result in superadditive (“synergistic”) effects. Thus, for example, reduced application rates and/or a widening of the activity spectrum and/or an increase in the activity of the active compounds and compositions which can be used according to the invention, better plant growth, increased tolerance to high or low temperatures, increased tolerance to drought or to water or soil salt content, increased flowering performance, easier harvesting, accelerated maturation, higher harvest yields, bigger fruits, larger plant height, greener leaf color, earlier flowering, higher quality and/or a higher nutritional value of the harvested products, higher sugar concentration within the fruits, better storage stability and/or processability of the harvested products are possible, which exceed the effects which were actually to be expected.
At certain application rates, the active compound combinations according to the invention may also have a strengthening effect in plants. Accordingly, they are also suitable for mobilizing the defense system of the plant against attack by unwanted microorganisms. This may, if appropriate, be one of the reasons for the enhanced activity of the combinations according to the invention, for example against fungi. Plant-strengthening (resistance-inducing) substances are to be understood as meaning, in the present context, those substances or combinations of substances which are capable of stimulating the defense system of plants in such a way that, when subsequently inoculated with unwanted microorganisms, the treated plants display a substantial degree of resistance to these microorganisms. In the present case, unwanted microorganisms are to be understood as meaning phytopathogenic fungi, bacteria and viruses. Thus, the substances according to the invention can be employed for protecting plants against attack by the abovementioned pathogens within a certain period of time after the treatment. The period of time within which protection is effected generally extends from 1 to 10 days, preferably 1 to 7 days, after the treatment of the plants with the active compounds.
Plants and plant cultivars which are preferably treated according to the invention include all plants which have genetic material which impart particularly advantageous, useful traits to these plants (whether obtained by breeding and/or biotechnological means).
Plants and plant cultivars which are also preferably treated according to the invention are resistant against one or more biotic stresses, i.e. said plants show a better defense against animal and microbial pests, such as against nematodes, insects, mites, phytopathogenic fungi, bacteria, viruses and/or viroids.
Examples of nematode resitant plants are described in e.g. U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 11/765,491, 11/765,494, 10/926,819, 10/782,020, 12/032,479, 10/783,417, 10/782,096, 11/657,964, 12/192,904, 11/396,808, 12/166,253, 12/166,239, 12/166,124, 12/166,209, 11/762,886, 12/364,335, 11/763,947, 12/252,453, 12/209,354, 12/491,396 or 12/497,221
Plants and plant cultivars which may also be treated according to the invention are those plants which are resistant to one or more abiotic stresses. Abiotic stress conditions may include, for example, drought, cold temperature exposure, heat exposure, osmotic stress, flooding, increased soil salinity, increased mineral exposure, ozone exposure, high light exposure, limited availability of nitrogen nutrients, limited availability of phosphorus nutrients, shade avoidance.
Plants and plant cultivars which may also be treated according to the invention, are those plants characterized by enhanced yield characteristics. Increased yield in said plants can be the result of, for example, improved plant physiology, growth and development, such as water use efficiency, water retention efficiency, improved nitrogen use, enhanced carbon assimilation, improved photosynthesis, increased germination efficiency and accelerated maturation. Yield can furthermore be affected by improved plant architecture (under stress and non-stress conditions), including but not limited to, early flowering, flowering control for hybrid seed production, seedling vigor, plant size, internode number and distance, root growth, seed size, fruit size, pod size, pod or ear number, seed number per pod or ear, seed mass, enhanced seed filling, reduced seed dispersal, reduced pod dehiscence and lodging resistance. Further yield traits include seed composition, such as carbohydrate content, protein content, oil content and composition, nutritional value, reduction in anti-nutritional compounds, improved processability and better storage stability.
Examples of plants with the above-mentioned traits are non-exhaustively listed in Table A.
Plants that may be treated according to the invention are hybrid plants that already express the characteristic of heterosis or hybrid vigor which results in generally higher yield, vigor, health and resistance towards biotic and abiotic stresses. Such plants are typically made by crossing an inbred male-sterile parent line (the female parent) with another inbred male-fertile parent line (the male parent). Hybrid seed is typically harvested from the male sterile plants and sold to growers. Male sterile plants can sometimes (e.g. in corn) be produced by detasseling, i.e. the mechanical removal of the male reproductive organs (or male flowers) but, more typically, male sterility is the result of genetic determinants in the plant genome. In that case, and especially when seed is the desired product to be harvested from the hybrid plants it is typically useful to ensure that male fertility in the hybrid plants is fully restored. This can be accomplished by ensuring that the male parents have appropriate fertility restorer genes which are capable of restoring the male fertility in hybrid plants that contain the genetic determinants responsible for male-sterility. Genetic determinants for male sterility may be located in the cytoplasm. Examples of cytoplasmic male sterility (CMS) were for instance described in Brassica species (WO 92/05251, WO 95/09910, WO 98/27806, WO 05/002324, WO 06/021972 and U.S. Pat. No. 6,229,072). However, genetic determinants for male sterility can also be located in the nuclear genome. Male sterile plants can also be obtained by plant biotechnology methods such as genetic engineering. A particularly useful means of obtaining male-sterile plants is described in WO 89/10396 in which, for example, a ribonuclease such as barnase is selectively expressed in the tapetum cells in the stamens. Fertility can then be restored by expression in the tapetum cells of a ribonuclease inhibitor such as barstar (e.g. WO 91/02069).
Plants or plant cultivars (obtained by plant biotechnology methods such as genetic engineering) which may be treated according to the invention are herbicide-tolerant plants, i.e. plants made tolerant to one or more given herbicides. Such plants can be obtained either by genetic transformation, or by selection of plants containing a mutation imparting such herbicide tolerance.
Herbicide-resistant plants are for example glyphosate-tolerant plants, i.e. plants made tolerant to the herbicide glyphosate or salts thereof. Plants can be made tolerant to glyphosate through different means. For example, glyphosate-tolerant plants can be obtained by transforming the plant with a gene encoding the enzyme 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase (EPSPS). Examples of such EPSPS genes are the AroA gene (mutant CT7) of the bacterium Salmonella typhimurium (Comai et al., 1983, Science 221, 370-371), the CP4 gene of the bacterium Agrobacterium sp. (Barry et al., 1992, Curr. Topics Plant Physiol. 7, 139-145), the genes encoding a Petunia EPSPS (Shah et al., 1986, Science 233, 478-481), a Tomato EPSPS (Gasser et al., 1988, J. Biol. Chem. 263, 4280-4289), or an Eleusine EPSPS (WO 01/66704). It can also be a mutated EPSPS as described in for example EP 0837944, WO 00/66746, WO 00/66747 or WO02/26995. Glyphosate-tolerant plants can also be obtained by expressing a gene that encodes a glyphosate oxido-reductase enzyme as described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,776,760 and 5,463,175. Glyphosate-tolerant plants can also be obtained by expressing a gene that encodes a glyphosate acetyl transferase enzyme as described in for example WO 02/36782, WO 03/092360, WO 05/012515 and WO 07/024,782. Glyphosate-tolerant plants can also be obtained by selecting plants containing naturally-occurring mutations of the above-mentioned genes, as described in for example WO 01/024615 or WO 03/013226. Plants expressing EPSPS genes that confer glyphosate tolerance are described in e.g. U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 11/517,991, 10/739,610, 12/139,408, 12/352,532, 11/312,866, 11/315,678, 12/421,292, 11/400,598, 11/651,752, 11/681,285, 11/605,824, 12/468,205, 11/760,570, 11/762,526, 11/769,327, 11/769,255, 11/943,801 or 12/362,774. Plants comprising other genes that confer glyphosate tolerance, such as decarboxylase genes, are described in e.g. U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 11/588,811, 11/185,342, 12/364,724, 11/185,560 or 12/423,926.
Other herbicide resistant plants are for example plants that have been made tolerant to herbicides inhibiting the enzyme glutamine synthase, such as bialaphos, phosphinothricin or glufosinate. Such plants can be obtained by expressing an enzyme detoxifying the herbicide or a mutant glutamine synthase enzyme that is resistant to inhibition, e.g. described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/760,602. One such efficient detoxifying enzyme is an enzyme encoding a phosphinothricin acetyltransferase (such as the bar or pat protein from Streptomyces species). Plants expressing an exogenous phosphinothricin acetyltransferase are for example described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,561,236; 5,648,477; 5,646,024; 5,273,894; 5,637,489; 5,276,268; 5,739,082; 5,908,810 and 7,112,665.
Further herbicide-tolerant plants are also plants that have been made tolerant to the herbicides inhibiting the enzyme hydroxyphenylpyruvatedioxygenase (HPPD). HPPD is an enzyme that catalyzes the reaction in which para-hydroxyphenylpyruvate (HPP) is transformed into homogentisate. Plants tolerant to HPPD-inhibitors can be transformed with a gene encoding a naturally-occurring resistant HPPD enzyme, or a gene encoding a mutated or chimeric HPPD enzyme as described in WO 96/38567, WO 99/24585 and WO 99/24586. Tolerance to HPPD-inhibitors can also be obtained by transforming plants with genes encoding certain enzymes enabling the formation of homogentisate despite the inhibition of the native HPPD enzyme by the HPPD-inhibitor. Such plants and genes are described in WO 99/34008 and WO 02/36787. Tolerance of plants to HPPD inhibitors can also be improved by transforming plants with a gene encoding an enzyme having prephenate dehydrogenase (PDH) activity in addition to a gene encoding an HPPD-tolerant enzyme, as described in WO 2004/024928. Further, plants can be made more tolerant to HPPD-inhibitor herbicides by adding into their genome a gene encoding an enzyme capable of metabolizing or degrading HPPD inhibitors, such as the CYP450 enzymes shown in WO 2007/103567 and WO 2008/150473.
Still further herbicide resistant plants are plants that have been made tolerant to acetolactate synthase (ALS) inhibitors. Known ALS-inhibitors include, for example, sulfonylurea, imidazolinone, triazolopyrimidines, pryimidinyoxy(thio)benzoates, and/or sulfonylaminocarbonyltriazolinone herbicides. Different mutations in the ALS enzyme (also known as acetohydroxyacid synthase, AHAS) are known to confer tolerance to different herbicides and groups of herbicides, as described for example in Tranel and Wright (2002, Weed Science 50:700-712), but also, in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,605,011, 5,378,824, 5,141,870, and 5,013,659. The production of sulfonylurea-tolerant plants and imidazolinone-tolerant plants is described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,605,011; 5,013,659; 5,141,870; 5,767,361; 5,731,180; 5,304,732; 4,761,373; 5,331,107; 5,928,937; and 5,378,824; and international publication WO 96/33270. Other imidazolinone-tolerant plants are also described in for example WO 2004/040012, WO 2004/106529, WO 2005/020673, WO 2005/093093, WO 2006/007373, WO 2006/015376, WO 2006/024351, and WO 2006/060634. Further sulfonylurea- and imidazolinone-tolerant plants are also described in for example WO 07/024,782 and U.S. Patent Application No. 61/288,958.
Other plants tolerant to imidazolinone and/or sulfonylurea can be obtained by induced mutagenesis, selection in cell cultures in the presence of the herbicide or mutation breeding as described for example for soybeans in U.S. Pat. No. 5,084,082, for rice in WO 97/41218, for sugar beet in U.S. Pat. No. 5,773,702 and WO 99/057965, for lettuce in U.S. Pat. No. 5,198,599, or for sunflower in WO 01/065922.
Plants or plant cultivars (obtained by plant biotechnology methods such as genetic engineering) which may also be treated according to the invention are insect-resistant transgenic plants, i.e. plants made resistant to attack by certain target insects. Such plants can be obtained by genetic transformation, or by selection of plants containing a mutation imparting such insect resistance.
An “insect-resistant transgenic plant”, as used herein, includes any plant containing at least one transgene comprising a coding sequence encoding:
Of course, an insect-resistant transgenic plant, as used herein, also includes any plant comprising a combination of genes encoding the proteins of any one of the above classes 1 to 10. In one embodiment, an insect-resistant plant contains more than one transgene encoding a protein of any one of the above classes 1 to 10, to expand the range of target insect species affected when using different proteins directed at different target insect species, or to delay insect resistance development to the plants by using different proteins insecticidal to the same target insect species but having a different mode of action, such as binding to different receptor binding sites in the insect.
An “insect-resistant transgenic plant”, as used herein, further includes any plant containing at least one transgene comprising a sequence producing upon expression a double-stranded RNA which upon ingestion by a plant insect pest inhibits the growth of this insect pest, as described e.g. in WO 2007/080126, WO 2006/129204, WO 2007/074405, WO 2007/080127 and WO 2007/035650.
Plants or plant cultivars (obtained by plant biotechnology methods such as genetic engineering) which may also be treated according to the invention are tolerant to abiotic stresses. Such plants can be obtained by genetic transformation, or by selection of plants containing a mutation imparting such stress resistance. Particularly useful stress tolerance plants include:
Plants or plant cultivars (obtained by plant biotechnology methods such as genetic engineering) which may also be treated according to the invention show altered quantity, quality and/or storage-stability of the harvested product and/or altered properties of specific ingredients of the harvested product such as:
Plants or plant cultivars (obtained by plant biotechnology methods such as genetic engineering) which may also be treated according to the invention are plants, such as cotton plants, with altered fiber characteristics. Such plants can be obtained by genetic transformation, or by selection of plants containing a mutation imparting such altered fiber characteristics and include:
Plants or plant cultivars (obtained by plant biotechnology methods such as genetic engineering) which may also be treated according to the invention are plants, such as oilseed rape or related Brassica plants, with altered oil profile characteristics. Such plants can be obtained by genetic transformation, or by selection of plants containing a mutation imparting such altered oil profile characteristics and include:
Plants or plant cultivars (obtained by plant biotechnology methods such as genetic engineering) which may also be treated according to the invention are plants, such as oilseed rape or related Brassica plants, with altered seed scattering characteristics. Such plants can be obtained by genetic transformation, or by selection of plants containing a mutation imparting such altered seed scattering characteristics and include plants such as oilseed rape plants with delayed or reduced seed scattering as described in U.S. Patent Appl. No. 61/135,230, WO09/068,313 and WO10/006,732.
Particularly useful transgenic plants which may be treated according to the invention are plants containing transformation events, or combination of transformation events, that are the subject of petitions for non-regulated status, in the United States of America, to the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) whether such petitions are granted or are still pending. At any time this information is readily available from APHIS (4700 River Road Riverdale, Md. 20737, USA), for instance on its internet site (URL http://www.aphis.usda.gov/brs/not_reg.html). On the filing date of this application the petitions for nonregulated status that were pending with APHIS or granted by APHIS were those listed in table B which contains the following information:
Additional particularly useful plants containing single transformation events or combinations of transformation events are listed for example in the databases from various national or regional regulatory agencies (see for example http://gmoinfo.jrc.it/gmp_browse.aspx and http://cera-gmc.org/index.php?evidcode=&hstIDXCode=&gType=&AbbrCode=&atCode=&stCode=&coIDCode=&action=gm_crop_database&mode=Submit).
Further particular transgenic plants include plants containing a transgene in an agronomically neutral or beneficial position as described in any of the patent publications listed in Table C.
In a particularly preferred variant, the process according to the invention is used for the treatment of transgenic vegetable, cotton and soybean cultivars.
Agrostis
stolonifera
Beta vulgaris
Agrobacterium tumefaciens; WO 2004-
Beta vulgaris
viridochromogenes, an aerobic soil
Beta vulgaris
Agrobacterium tumefaciens.
Beta vulgaris
Brassica
napus (Argentine
californica).
Brassica
napus (Argentine
Brassica
napus (Argentine
Brassica
napus (Argentine
anthropi.
Brassica
napus (Argentine
anthropi.
Brassica
napus (Argentine
viridochromogenes, an aerobic soil
Brassica
napus (Argentine
viridochromogenes, an aerobic soil
Brassica
napus (Argentine
amyloliquefaciens, RF lines contained the
Streptomyces hygroscopicus.
Brassica
napus (Argentine
amyloliquefaciens, RF lines contained the
Streptomyces hygroscopicus.
Brassica
napus (Argentine
amyloliquefaciens, RF lines contained the
Streptomyces hygroscopicus.
Brassica
napus (Argentine
Brassica
napus (Argentine
Brassica
napus (Argentine
Brassica
napus (Argentine
Brassica
napus (Argentine
amyloliquefaciens; fertility restoration by
Brassica
napus (Argentine
amyloliquefaciens; fertility restoration by
Brassica
napus (Argentine
Brassica
napus (Argentine
viridochromogenes, an aerobic soil
Brassica
rapa (Polish
napus line T45. This trait is mediated by the
Brassica
rapa (Polish
Carica papaya
Cichorium
intybus
amyloliquefaciens; PPT resistance was via
Cucumis
melo (Melon)
Cucurbita
pepo (Squash)
Cucurbita
pepo (Squash)
Dianthus
caryophyllus
Dianthus
caryophyllus
Dianthus
caryophyllus
Glycine max
Glycine max
Glycine max
Streptomyces viridochromogenes.
Glycine max
Streptomyces viridochromogenes.
Glycine max
Glycine max
Glycine max
Glycine max
Glycine max
Glycine max
Streptomyces viridochromogenes.
Glycine max
Glycine max
Glycine max
Glycine max
Glycine max
tumefaciens CP4; WO2006130436
Glycine max
Glycine max
Streptomyces hygroscopicus.
Gossypium
hirsutum
thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki.
Gossypium
hirsutum
Gossypium
hirsutum
Gossypium
hirsutum
Gossypium
hirsutum
Streptomyces viridochromogenes was
Gossypium
hirsutum
Gossypium
hirsutum
pneumoniae.
Gossypium
hirsutum
Gossypium
hirsutum
Gossypium
hirsutum
Gossypium
hirsutum
Gossypium
hirsutum
Gossypium
hirsutum
thuringiensis AB88. The APH4 encoding
Gossypium
hirsutum
Gossypium
hirsutum
Gossypium
hirsutum
Gossypium
hirsutum
Gossypium
hirsutum
Gossypium
hirsutum
Gossypium
hirsutum
Gossypium
hirsutum
Gossypium
hirsutum
Gossypium
hirsutum
Gossypium
hirsutum
Gossypium
hirsutum
Streptomyces hygroscopicus; WO
Gossypium
hirsutum
Gossypium
hirsutum
Gossypium
hirsutum
Gossypium
hirsutum
Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Insect resistance
Gossypium
hirsutum
Gossypium
hirsutum
Gossypium
hirsutum
Gossypium
hirsutum
Gossypium
hirsutum
Gossypium
hirsutum
Gossypium
hirsutum
Helianthus
annuus
Lens culinaris
Linum
usitatissimum
Lycopersicon
esculentum
Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. Kurstaki.
Lycopersicon
esculentum
Lycopersicon
esculentum
Lycopersicon
esculentum
Lycopersicon
esculentum
Lycopersicon
esculentum
Medicago
sativa (Alfalfa)
Agrobacterium tumefaciens.
Nicotiana
tabacum
Nicotiana
tabacum
Oryza
sativa (Rice)
Oryza
sativa (Rice)
Oryza
sativa (Rice)
Oryza
sativa (Rice)
Oryza
sativa (Rice)
Streptomyces hygroscopicus.
Oryza
sativa (Rice)
Streptomyces hygroscopicus.
Oryza
sativa (Rice)
Oryza
sativa (Rice)
Oryza
sativa (Rice)
Prunus
domestica (Plum)
Solanum
tuberosum
Bacillus thuringiensis (subsp. Tenebrionis).
Solanum
tuberosum
Bacillus thuringiensis (subsp. Tenebrionis).
Solanum
tuberosum
thuringiensis (subsp. Tenebrionis) and the
Solanum
tuberosum
thuringiensis (subsp. Tenebrionis) and the
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Fusarium resistance (trichothecene 3-O-
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Triticum
aestivum
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
coli and Streptomyces viridochromogenes,
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki, and
viridochromogenes.
Zea mays
viridochromogenes. Corn rootworm-
thuringiensis.
Zea mays
S. viridochromogenes. Corn rootworm-
thuringiensis. Tolerance to glyphosate
Zea mays
Bacillus thuringiensis subsp tolworthi and
Zea mays
Bacillus thuringiensis var aizawai and the
Zea mays
viridochromogenes was introduced as a
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
E. coli was used as a selectable marker;
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Bacillus thuringiensis and the 5-
Zea mays
nubilalis) by introduction of a synthetic
Zea mays
Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki HD-1.
Zea mays
kurstaki HD-1 present in MON810. Corn
Zea mays
Zea mays
thuringiensis subsp. kumamotoensis.
Zea mays
Zea mays
thuringiensis subspecies kumamotoensis
Zea mays
thuringiensis providing resistance to a
Zea mays
tumefaciens present in MON88017.
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
amyloliquefaciens; PPT resistance was via
Zea mays
amyloliquefaciens; PPT resistance was via
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
viridochromogenes.
Zea mays
thuringiensis var. aizawai and the
viridochromogenes.
Zea mays
thuringiensis var. aizawai. Corn rootworm-
Streptomyces viridochromogenes.
Zea mays
In one embodiment of the invention, the plants A-1 to A-183 in Table A, in whole or in part, or propagation material of these plants are or is treated or contacted with the active ingredient combinations of the invention or with the mixture/beneficial species combinations of the invention.
Sclerotinia blight
Eucalyptus
Cichorium
intybus
In one embodiment of the invention, the plants B-1 to B-129 from Table B, in whole or in part, or propagation material of these plants, are or is treated or contacted with the active ingredient combinations of the invention or with the mixture/beneficial species combinations of the invention.
Sclerotinia resistance
Botrytis resistance
Bremia resistance
Erwinia resistance
In one embodiment of the invention, the plants which encompass or express the traits C-1 to C-14 from Table C, in whole or in part, or propagation material of these plants, are or is treated or contacted with the active ingredient combinations of the invention or with the mixture/beneficial species combinations of the invention.
Fusarium resistance
In one embodiment, the plants which encompass a transgenic event as per D-1 to D-48 from Table D or express such a trait, in whole or in part or propagation material from these plants, are or is treated or contacted with the active ingredient combinations of the invention or with the mixture/beneficial species combinations of the invention.
Beta vulgaris
Brassica napus
Brassica napus
Brassica
napus (canola)
Glycine max
Glycine max
Glycine max
Glycine max
Glycine max
Gossypium
hirsutum
Gossypium
hirsutum
Gossypium
hirsutum L.
Gossypium
hirsutum
Gossypium
hirsutum
Gossypium
hirsutum
Gossypium
hirsutum
Gossypium
hirsutum
Gossypium
hirsutum
Gossypium
hirsutum
Gossypium
hirsutum
Gossypium
hirsutum
Gossypium
hirsutum
Medicago
sativa (alfalfa)
Oryza sativa
Solanum
tuberosum
decemlineata
Solanum
tuberosum
decemlineata
Solanum
tuberosum
Triticum
aestivum
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
Zea mays
In one embodiment, the plants which encompass a transgenic event as per E-1 to E-50 from Table E or express such a trait, in whole or in part, or propagation material of these plants, are or is treated or contacted with the active ingredient combinations of the invention or with the mixture/beneficial species combinations of the invention.
The plants listed may be treated with particular advantage in accordance with the invention with the active ingredient combinations or mixture/beneficial species combinations of the invention. The preference ranges indicated above for the combinations apply also in respect of the treatment of these plants. Particular emphasis may be given to plant treatment with the active ingredient combinations and mixture/beneficial species combinations set out specifically in the present text.
The active ingredient combinations and mixture/beneficial species combinations can be converted into the typical formulations, such as solutions, emulsions, wettable powders, suspensions, powders, dusts, pastes, soluble powders, granules, suspension emulsion concentrates, active ingredient-impregnated natural and synthetic materials, and microencapsulations in polymeric substances.
These formulations are prepared in a known way, as for example by mixing the active ingredient with extenders, i.e. liquid solvents and/or solid carriers, optionally with the use of surface-active agents, i.e. emulsifiers and/or dispersants and/or foam formers.
Examples of suitable extenders include water, polar and apolar organic chemical liquids, for example from the classes of the aromatic and non-aromatic hydrocarbons (such as paraffins, alkylbenzenes, alkylnaphthalenes, chlorobenzenes), the alcohols and polyols (which optionally may also be substituted, etherified and/or esterified), the ketones (such as acetone, cyclohexanone), esters (including fats and oils) and (poly)ethers, the simple and substituted amines, amides, lactams (such as N-alkylpyrrolidones) and lactones, the sulphones and sulphoxides (such as dimethyl sulphoxide).
Where water is used as an extender it is also possible, for example, to use organic solvents as co-solvents. Liquid solvents contemplated include essentially the following: aromatics, such as xylene, toluene, or alkyl-naphthalenes, chlorinated aromatics and chlorinated aliphatic hydrocarbons, such as chlorobenzenes, chloroethylenes or methylene chloride, aliphatic hydrocarbons, such as cyclohexane or paraffins, for example mineral oil fractions, mineral and vegetable oils, alcohols, such as butanol or glycol and also their ethers and esters, ketones such as acetone, methyl ethyl ketone, methyl isobutyl ketone or cyclohexanone, strongly polar solvents, such as dimethylformamide and dimethyl sulphoxide, and water.
Solid carriers contemplated include the following:
In the formulations there may be adhesives used such as carboxymethylcellulose, natural and synthetic polymers in powder, granule or latex form, such as gum arabic, polyvinyl alcohol, polyvinyl acetate, and also natural phospholipids, such as cephalins and lecithins and synthetic phospholipids. Further possible additives include mineral and vegetable oils.
It is possible to use colorants such as inorganic pigments, e.g. iron oxide, titanium oxide, Prussian blue, and organic dyes, such as alizarin dyes, azo dyes and metal phthalocyanine dyes, and trace nutrients such as salts of iron, manganese, boron, copper, cobalt, molybdenum and zinc.
The formulations generally contain between 0.1% and 95% by weight of active ingredient, preferably between 0.5% and 90%, and in addition preferably extenders and/or surface-active agents.
The active ingredient content of the use forms prepared from the commercial formulations may vary within wide ranges. The active ingredient concentration of the use forms may be from 0.0000001% up to 95% by weight active ingredient, preferably between 0.0001% and 1% by weight.
Application takes place in a conventional way adapted to the use forms.
The good insecticidal and/or acaricidal activity of the active ingredient combinations is evident from the examples below. While the individual active ingredients have weaknesses in their activity, the combinations display an activity which exceeds a simple summation of activities.
A synergistic effect with insecticides/acaricides is present whenever the activity of the active ingredient combinations is greater than the sum of the activities of the active ingredients when applied individually.
The activity which can be expected for a given combination of two active ingredients can be calculated by the method of S. R. Colby, Weeds 15 (1967), 20-22), as follows:
If the actual degree of insecticidal destruction is greater than calculated, then the combination is superadditive in its destruction—in other words, there is a synergistic effect. In this case, the degree of destruction actually observed must be greater than the figure for the expected degree of destruction (E) as calculated from the formula given above.
Particularly preferred are animal pests from the order of the mites (Acari), in particular from the families of the gall mites (Eriophyidae), thread-footed mites (Tarsonemidae) and spider mites (Tetranychidae).
Gall Mites (Eriophyidae)
Especially preferred is the control of the following species from the family of the gall mites (Eriophyidae) in the following crops:
Aculops lycopersici
Aculops pelekassi
Aculus schlechtendali
Aculus fokeui,
Aculus berochensis
Aculus conutus
Aceria sheldoni
Aceria tulipai
Epitrimerus pyri
Epitrimerus vitis
Eriophyes avellanae
Eriophyes guerreronis
Eriophyes litchii
Eriophyes piri
Eriophyes ribis
Eriophyes theae
Eriophyes vitis
Phyllocoptrutua
oleivora
Thread-Footed Mites (Tarsonemidae)
Especially preferred is the control of the following species from the family of the thread-footed mites (Tarsonemidae) in the following crops:
Hemitarsonemus
latus
Spider Mites (Tetranychidae)
Especially preferred is the control of the following species from the family of the spider mites (Tetranychidae) in the following crops:
Brevipalpus lewisi
Brevipalpus obovatus
Brevipalpus oudemansi
Brevipalpus phoenicis
Eotetranychus carpirii
Eotetranychus willamelti
Eotetranychus hicoriae
Eotetranychus yumensis
Panonychus citri
Panonychus ulmi
Tetranychus canadensis
Tetranychus urtricae
Tetranychus parcificus
Tetranychus cinnabarinus
Tetranychus turkestani
Tetranychus viennensis
Tetranychus kanzawai
Oligonychus coffeae
Oligonychus ilicis
Oligonychus mexicanus
Oligonychus persea
Oligonychus punicae
In plots measuring approximately 14 m2, aubergines (around 11 weeks after planting out) of the cultivar “Heilongchangqie” are treated in three replications against Tetranychus urticae. Application takes place using a sprayer. In this example, the mixture of the active ingredients Oberon, Example (I), and abamectin, Example (VI), is tested against the commercial standards abamectin (018 EC) and Oberon (240 SC) at the stated application rates and in the stated mixing ratios. The water application rate is 450 l/ha.
Evaluation is made 1 day and 55 days after treatment, by scoring the destruction of the eggs on the leaves.
A further evaluation is made 45 and 55 days after treatment, by scoring the destruction of the nymphs on the leaves.
In plots measuring approximately 6 m2, roses of the cultivar “Blizard” with an age of approximately 3 years are treated in three replications against Tetranychus urticae. Application takes place using a back-mounted spray (3.5 bar). In this example, the mixture of the active ingredients Oberon, Example (I), and abamectin, Example (VI), is tested against the commercial standards abamectin (018 EC) and Oberon (240 SC) at the stated application rates and in the stated mixing ratios. The water application rate is 1320 l/ha.
Evaluation is made 3 days after treatment, by counting the adults on the leaves/square inch. Subsequently, the activity is calculated as a percentage by the method of Henderson and Tilton.
In plots measuring approximately 6 m2, tomatoes of the cultivar “Leader” are treated in three replications against Tetranychus urticae. Application takes place using a back-mounted spray (4.5 bar). In this example, the mixture of the active ingredients Oberon, Example (I), and abamectin, Example (VI), is tested against the commercial standards abamectin (018 EC) and Oberon (480 SC) at the stated application rates and in the stated mixing ratios. The water application rate is 1000 l/ha.
Evaluation is made 3 days after treatment, by scoring the destruction of the adults on the leaves.
In plots measuring approximately 15 m2, cotton plants of the cultivar “BRS Aroeira” with a height of approximately 80 cm are treated in three replications against Tetranychus urticae. Application takes place using a spray at 2.5 bar. In this example, the mixture of the active ingredients Oberon, Example (I), and abamectin, Example (VI), is tested against the commercial standards abamectin (018 EC) and Oberon (240 SC) at the stated application rates and in the stated mixing ratios. The water application rate is 200 l/ha.
Evaluation is made 13 days after treatment, by scoring the destruction of the population on the leaves.
In plots measuring approximately 14 m2, roses (growth stage 46) of the cultivar “Freedom” in double rows are treated in three replications against Tetranychus urticae. Application takes place using a back-mounted spray. In this example, the mixture of the active ingredients Oberon, Example (I), and abamectin, Example (VI), is tested against the commercial standards abamectin (018 EC) and Oberon (240 SC) at the stated application rates and in the stated mixing ratios. The water application rate is 1000 l/ha.
Evaluation is made 1 day after treatment, by scoring the destruction of the population on the leaves.
In plots measuring approximately 8 m2, aubergines (growth stage 15) of the cultivar “Suqi qie” are treated in three replications against Tetranychus urticae. Application takes place using a back-mounted sprayer. In this example, a ready-prepared mixture (ratio 20:1) of the active ingredients Oberon, Example (I), and abamectin, Example (VI) as SC 240, is tested against the commercial standards abamectin (018 EC) and Oberon (240 SC) at the stated application rates. The water application rate is 450 l/ha.
Evaluation is made 1 day after treatment, by scoring the destruction of the males on the leaves.
A further evaluation is made 21 days after treatment, by scoring the destruction of the eggs, the destruction of the males, and the total population on the leaves.
In plots measuring approximately 6 m2, bell peppers of the cultivar “California Wonder” (growth stage 75) are treated in three replications against Hemitarsonemus latus. Application takes place using a sprayer at 2.5 bar pressure. In this example, a ready-prepared mixture (ratio 20:1) of the active ingredients Oberon, Example (I), and abamectin, Example (VI) as SC 240, is tested against the commercial standards abamectin (018 EC) and Oberon (240 SC) at the stated application rates and in the stated mixing ratios. The water application rate is 300 l/ha.
Evaluation is made 2 days after treatment, by scoring the destruction of the adults on the leaves.
Tetranychus urticae—Test on Cotton
An appropriate preparation of active ingredient is prepared by mixing 1 part by weight of active ingredient with the stated amounts of solvent and emulsifier and diluting the concentrate with emulsifier-containing water to the desired concentration.
Cotton plants (Gossypium hirsutum) infected with the two-spotted spider mite (Tetranychus urticae) are treated by being sprayed with the preparation of active ingredient in the desired concentration.
After the desired time, a determination is made of the destruction in %. 100% here means that all of the mites have been killed; 0% means that no mites have been killed. The destruction figures ascertained are calculated by the Colby formula.
In this test, the following active ingredient combination of the present specification exhibits a synergistically boosted activity in comparison to the compounds employed individually:
Tetranychus urticae - test on cotton
Thripse (Thripidae)
Additionally especially preferred is the control of the following species from the family of the Thripse (Thripidae) in the following crops:
Frankliniella occidentalis
Frankliniella schultzei
Frankliniella furca
Thrips palmi
Thrips tabaci
Thrips hawaiiensis
Heliothrips
haemorrhoidalis
Hercinothrips femoralis
Hercinothrips bicinctus
Hercinothrips phaseoli
Caliothrips phaseoli
Baliothrips biformis
Anaphothrips obscurus
Scirthothrips aurantii
Scirthothrips dorsalis
Scirthothrips citri
Kakothrips pisivora
In plots measuring approximately 10 m2, bell peppers of the cultivar “Italiano verde” are treated in three replications against Frankliniella occidentalis. Application is made using a back-mounted spray (10 bar). The mixture of the active ingredients Oberon, Example (I), and abamectin, Example (VI), is tested against the commercial standards abamectin (018 EC) and Oberon (240 SC) at the stated application rates and in the stated mixing ratios. The water application rate is 750 l/ha. Two applications are carried out, at an interval of 7 days.
Evaluation is made 7 days after the second treatment, by scoring the destruction of the adults in the flowers.
Evaluation is made 14 days after the second treatment, by scoring the destruction of the mixed population in the flowers.
White Fly (Aleyrodidae)
Further especially preferred is the control of the following species from the family of the white fly (Aleyrodidae) in the following crops:
Bemisia tabaci—Test on Cotton
An appropriate preparation of active ingredient is prepared by mixing 1 part by weight of active ingredient with the stated amounts of solvent and emulsifier and diluting the concentrate with emulsifier-containing water to the desired concentration.
Cotton plants (Gossypium hirsutum) infested with whitefly (Bemisia tabaci) are treated by being sprayed with the preparation of active ingredient at the desired concentration.
After the desired time, the destruction is determined in %. 100% here means that all of the whitefly have been killed; 0% means that no whitefly have been killed. The destruction figures ascertained are calculated by the Colby formula.
In this test, the following active ingredient combination in accordance with the present specification exhibits a synergistically boosted activity in comparison to the compounds when applied individually:
Bemisia tabaci - test on cotton
Bemisia tabaci—Test on Cabbage
An appropriate preparation of active ingredient is prepared by mixing 1 part by weight of active ingredient with the stated amounts of solvent and emulsifier and diluting the concentrate with emulsifier-containing water to the desired concentration.
Cabbage plants (Brassica oleracea) infested with whitefly (Bemisia tabaci) are treated by being sprayed with the preparation of active ingredient at the desired concentration.
After the desired time, the destruction is determined in %. 100% here means that all of the whitefly have been killed; 0% means that no whitefly have been killed. The destruction figures ascertained are calculated by the Colby formula.
In this test, the following active ingredient combination in accordance with the present specification exhibits a synergistically boosted activity in comparison to the compounds when applied individually:
Bemisia tabaci - test on cabbage
Leaf-Mining Flies (Agromyzidae)
Additionally especially preferred is the control of the following species from the family of the leaf-mining flies (Agromyzidae) in the following crops:
Liriomyza brassicae
Liriomyza bryoniae
Liriomyza cepae
Liriomyza chilensis
Liriomyza hunidobrensis
Liriomyza sativae
Liriomyza trifolie
Liriomyza quadrata
Pegomya hyoscyami
Pegomya spinaciae
Jumping Lice (Psyllidae)
Especially preferred is the control of the following species from the family of the jumping lice (Psyllidae):
Psylla pyricola
Psylla piri
Psylla pyrisuga
Psylla costalis
Paratrioza cockerelli
Tenalaphara malayensis
Diaphorina citri
Trioza erythrae
The good preservation of beneficial species and/or good insecticidal and/or acaricidal activity of the mixture/beneficial species combinations of the invention is evident from the examples below.
The activity which can be expected for a given combination of two active ingredients can be calculated by the method of S. R. Colby, Weeds 15 (1967), pages 20-22, as follows:
If the actual degree of insecticidal or acaricidal destruction is less than calculated, then the combination is non-additive in its destruction—in other words, there is an antagonistic effect, and the population of beneficial species is preserved. In this case, the degree of destruction actually observed must be less than the figure for the expected degree of destruction (E) as calculated from the formula given above.
Amblyseius swirskii—Test on Plums
An appropriate solution for application is prepared by diluting the respective formulation to the desired concentration.
Plum leaves colonized by a mixed population of the predatory mite (Amblyseius swirskii) are treated by being sprayed with the application solution at the desired concentration.
After the desired time, a determination is made of the number of active stages, in %. 100% here means that all of the predatory mites have been killed; 0% means that no predatory mites have been killed. The destruction figures ascertained are calculated by the Colby formula.
In this test it is found that the active ingredient combination in various concentration ranges is more preserving of beneficial species in comparison to at least one compound when applied individually.
Amblyseius swirskii - test on plums
Coccinella septempunctata/Larvae—Test on Plums
An appropriate solution for application is prepared by diluting the respective formulation to the desired concentration.
Plum leaves colonized by larvae of the seven-spotted ladybird (Coccinella septempunctata) are treated by being sprayed with the application solution at the desired concentration.
After the desired time, the destruction is determined in %. 100% here means that all of the ladybird larvae have been killed; 0% means that no ladybird larvae have been killed. The destruction figures ascertained are calculated by the Colby formula.
In this test it is found that the active ingredient combination in various concentration ranges is more preserving of beneficial species in comparison to at least one compound when applied individually.
Coccinella septempunctata larvae - test on plums
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10151415 | Jan 2010 | EP | regional |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3272854 | Covey et al. | Sep 1966 | A |
| 3835176 | Matsuo et al. | Sep 1974 | A |
| 4310519 | Albers-Schonberg et al. | Jan 1982 | A |
| 4761373 | Anderson et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
| 5013659 | Bedbrook et al. | May 1991 | A |
| 5084082 | Sebastian | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5141870 | Bedbrook et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5198599 | Thill | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5262383 | Fischer et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5273894 | Strauch et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
| 5276268 | Strauch et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5304732 | Anderson et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5331107 | Anderson et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5378824 | Bedbrook et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5434283 | Wong et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5463175 | Barry et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5561236 | Leemans et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5605011 | Bedbrook et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5637489 | Strauch et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5646024 | Leemans et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5648477 | Leemans et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5712107 | Nichols | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5731180 | Dietrich | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5739082 | Donn | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5767361 | Dietrich | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5773702 | Penner et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5776760 | Barry et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5824790 | Keeling et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5840946 | Wong et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5866782 | Iwabuchi et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5908810 | Donn | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5908975 | Caimi et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5928937 | Kakefuda et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5965755 | Sernyk et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5969169 | Fan | Oct 1999 | A |
| 6013861 | Bird et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6040497 | Spencer et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6063947 | DeBonte et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6130367 | Kossmann et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6162966 | Kossmann et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6169190 | Lanuza et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6207880 | Kossmann et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6211436 | Kossmann et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6229072 | Burns et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6245968 | Boudec et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6255561 | Kossmann et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6255563 | Emmermann et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6268549 | Sailland et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6270828 | DeBonte et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6284479 | Nichols | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6294712 | Kleine et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6307124 | Kossmann et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6323392 | Charne | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6436988 | Wachendorff-Neumann | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6465203 | Nichols | Oct 2002 | B2 |
| 6566585 | Quanz | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6566587 | Lebrun et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6590141 | Frohberg | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6596928 | Landschütze | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6653343 | Fischer et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6699694 | Buttcher et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6706758 | Fischer et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6716874 | Bretschneider et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
| 6734341 | Singletary et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6791010 | Frohberg | Sep 2004 | B1 |
| 6794558 | Frohberg | Sep 2004 | B1 |
| 6812010 | Derose et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
| 6890732 | Loerz et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
| 6891088 | Neuhaus et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
| 6897358 | Loerz et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6919090 | Fischer et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6940001 | Landschütze | Sep 2005 | B1 |
| 7112665 | Leemans et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
| 7157281 | Dizigan et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7304209 | Zink et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7335816 | Kraus et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7435807 | Barbour et al. | Oct 2008 | B1 |
| 7576264 | Dogimont et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 20030083371 | Fischer et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030100604 | Fischer et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030114312 | Fischer et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030126634 | Spencer et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030185813 | Fischer et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030211944 | Fischer et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20040117870 | Weyens et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040148666 | Rangwala et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040177399 | Hammer et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040180373 | Levine | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040180873 | Hanssen et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040197916 | Carozzi et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040210964 | Carozzi et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040216186 | Carozzi et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040250317 | Huber et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050257283 | Matringe et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20060021093 | Hammer et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060070139 | Bing et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060095986 | Cavato et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060130175 | Ellis et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060150269 | Hammer et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060150270 | Hammer et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060162007 | Guo et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060168690 | Shibatani et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060230473 | Johnson et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060242732 | Carozzi et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060253921 | Carozzi et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060282915 | Malven et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070004907 | Hammer et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070022496 | Moor et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070056056 | Behr et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070067868 | Negrotto et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070107078 | Hammer et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070136840 | Peters et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070169218 | Carr et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070240239 | Carozzi et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070254949 | Bretschneider et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070289035 | Vande Berg et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070292854 | Behr et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080064032 | Townshend et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080176801 | Carozzi et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080250533 | Frohberg | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080289060 | De Beuckeleer et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080312419 | Hammer et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090044291 | Zhang et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090100543 | Carozzi et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090119797 | Hammer et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090126044 | Carozzi et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090151018 | Hammer et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090156669 | Fischer et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090181399 | Negrotto et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090193545 | Watson | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090203075 | Hammer et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090227771 | Peters et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090253784 | Fischer et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090313717 | Hernandez et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100083404 | Ogawa et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100113273 | Takabe et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100130366 | Andersch et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100168042 | Funke et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100173987 | Fischer et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100199764 | Hammer | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100216738 | Fischer et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20110023189 | Takahashi et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110119790 | Fujino et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| B-8663191 | Sep 1994 | AU |
| 2 561 992 | Mar 2007 | CA |
| 2 718 396 | Sep 2009 | CA |
| 2 737 735 | Apr 2010 | CA |
| 1840655 | Oct 2006 | CN |
| 103 42 673 | Apr 2005 | DE |
| 0 089 202 | Sep 1983 | EP |
| 0 134 439 | Mar 1985 | EP |
| 0 234 045 | Sep 1987 | EP |
| 0 326 329 | Aug 1989 | EP |
| 2 216 408 | Aug 2010 | EP |
| 2006-304779 | Nov 2006 | JP |
| WO 8910396 | Nov 1989 | WO |
| WO 9102069 | Feb 1991 | WO |
| WO 9214827 | Sep 1992 | WO |
| WO 9310083 | May 1993 | WO |
| WO 9318170 | Sep 1993 | WO |
| WO 9404692 | Mar 1994 | WO |
| WO 9404693 | Mar 1994 | WO |
| WO 9409144 | Apr 1994 | WO |
| WO 9411520 | May 1994 | WO |
| WO 9421795 | Sep 1994 | WO |
| WO 9423043 | Oct 1994 | WO |
| WO 9504826 | Feb 1995 | WO |
| WO 9507355 | Mar 1995 | WO |
| WO 9509911 | Apr 1995 | WO |
| WO 9513389 | May 1995 | WO |
| WO 9520669 | Aug 1995 | WO |
| WO 9526407 | Oct 1995 | WO |
| WO 9531553 | Nov 1995 | WO |
| WO 9535026 | Dec 1995 | WO |
| WO 9601904 | Jan 1996 | WO |
| WO 9619581 | Jun 1996 | WO |
| WO 9621023 | Jul 1996 | WO |
| WO 9630517 | Oct 1996 | WO |
| WO 9630529 | Oct 1996 | WO |
| WO 9633270 | Oct 1996 | WO |
| WO 9634968 | Nov 1996 | WO |
| WO 9713865 | Apr 1997 | WO |
| WO 9720936 | Jun 1997 | WO |
| WO 9730163 | Aug 1997 | WO |
| WO 9741218 | Nov 1997 | WO |
| WO 9745545 | Dec 1997 | WO |
| WO 9746080 | Dec 1997 | WO |
| WO 9747806 | Dec 1997 | WO |
| WO 9747807 | Dec 1997 | WO |
| WO 9747808 | Dec 1997 | WO |
| WO 9800549 | Jan 1998 | WO |
| WO 9820145 | May 1998 | WO |
| WO 9822604 | May 1998 | WO |
| WO 9827212 | Jun 1998 | WO |
| WO 9827806 | Jul 1998 | WO |
| WO 9832326 | Jul 1998 | WO |
| WO 9839460 | Sep 1998 | WO |
| WO 9840503 | Sep 1998 | WO |
| WO 9900502 | Jan 1999 | WO |
| WO 9912950 | Mar 1999 | WO |
| WO 9915680 | Apr 1999 | WO |
| WO 9924593 | May 1999 | WO |
| WO 9953072 | Oct 1999 | WO |
| WO 9957965 | Nov 1999 | WO |
| WO 9960141 | Nov 1999 | WO |
| WO 9966050 | Dec 1999 | WO |
| WO 0004173 | Jan 2000 | WO |
| WO 0011192 | Mar 2000 | WO |
| WO 0014249 | Mar 2000 | WO |
| WO 0028052 | May 2000 | WO |
| WO 0047727 | Aug 2000 | WO |
| WO 0063432 | Oct 2000 | WO |
| WO 0066746 | Nov 2000 | WO |
| WO 0066747 | Nov 2000 | WO |
| WO 0073422 | Dec 2000 | WO |
| WO 0073475 | Dec 2000 | WO |
| WO 0077229 | Dec 2000 | WO |
| WO 0114569 | Mar 2001 | WO |
| WO 0117333 | Mar 2001 | WO |
| WO 0119975 | Mar 2001 | WO |
| WO 0124615 | Apr 2001 | WO |
| WO 0131042 | May 2001 | WO |
| WO 0141558 | Jun 2001 | WO |
| WO 0151627 | Jul 2001 | WO |
| WO 0151654 | Jul 2001 | WO |
| WO 0160158 | Aug 2001 | WO |
| WO 0165922 | Sep 2001 | WO |
| WO 0166704 | Sep 2001 | WO |
| WO 0170027 | Sep 2001 | WO |
| WO 0178511 | Oct 2001 | WO |
| WO 0183818 | Nov 2001 | WO |
| WO 0198509 | Dec 2001 | WO |
| WO 0202776 | Jan 2002 | WO |
| WO 0222836 | Mar 2002 | WO |
| WO 0226995 | Apr 2002 | WO |
| WO 0234923 | May 2002 | WO |
| WO 0236782 | May 2002 | WO |
| WO 0236831 | May 2002 | WO |
| WO 0245485 | Jun 2002 | WO |
| WO 02061043 | Aug 2002 | WO |
| WO 02079410 | Oct 2002 | WO |
| WO 02081713 | Oct 2002 | WO |
| WO 02085105 | Oct 2002 | WO |
| WO 02099385 | Dec 2002 | WO |
| WO 02101059 | Dec 2002 | WO |
| WO 03013224 | Feb 2003 | WO |
| WO 03013226 | Feb 2003 | WO |
| WO 03033540 | Apr 2003 | WO |
| WO 03033651 | Apr 2003 | WO |
| WO 03052073 | Jun 2003 | WO |
| WO 03071860 | Sep 2003 | WO |
| WO 03092360 | Nov 2003 | WO |
| WO 2004040012 | May 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004049786 | Jun 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004053219 | Jun 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004056999 | Jul 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004072235 | Aug 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004078983 | Sep 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004090140 | Oct 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004101751 | Nov 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004106529 | Dec 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004111245 | Dec 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004113542 | Dec 2004 | WO |
| WO 2005000007 | Jan 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005002324 | Jan 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005002359 | Jan 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005012515 | Feb 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005017157 | Feb 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005020673 | Mar 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005021585 | Mar 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005030941 | Apr 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005030942 | Apr 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005033318 | Apr 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005038032 | Apr 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005059103 | Jun 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005065453 | Jul 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005090578 | Sep 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005093093 | Oct 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005095617 | Oct 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005095618 | Oct 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005095619 | Oct 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005095632 | Oct 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005103266 | Nov 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005103270 | Nov 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005103301 | Nov 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005123927 | Dec 2005 | WO |
| WO 2006007373 | Jan 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006009649 | Jan 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006015376 | Feb 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006018319 | Feb 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006021972 | Mar 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006024351 | Mar 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006032469 | Mar 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006032538 | Mar 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006038794 | Apr 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006045633 | May 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006046861 | May 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006055851 | May 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006060634 | Jun 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006063862 | Jun 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006072603 | Jul 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006085966 | Aug 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006103107 | Oct 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006108674 | Oct 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006108675 | Oct 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006108702 | Oct 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006119457 | Nov 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006125065 | Nov 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006128568 | Dec 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006128569 | Dec 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006128570 | Dec 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006128571 | Dec 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006128572 | Dec 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006128573 | Dec 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006129204 | Dec 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006130436 | Dec 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006133827 | Dec 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006135717 | Dec 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006136351 | Dec 2006 | WO |
| WO 2007009823 | Jan 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007017186 | Feb 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007024782 | Mar 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007027777 | Mar 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007035650 | Mar 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007039314 | Apr 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007039316 | Apr 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007053015 | May 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007073167 | Jun 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007074405 | Jul 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007076115 | Jul 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007080126 | Jul 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007080127 | Jul 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007091277 | Aug 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007092704 | Aug 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007103567 | Sep 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007103768 | Sep 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007107302 | Sep 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007107326 | Sep 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007131699 | Nov 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007140256 | Dec 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007142840 | Dec 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007146767 | Dec 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007146980 | Dec 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007147029 | Dec 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007147096 | Dec 2007 | WO |
| WO 2008002480 | Jan 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008002872 | Jan 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008002962 | Jan 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008002964 | Jan 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008005210 | Jan 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008006033 | Jan 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008008779 | Jan 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008015263 | Feb 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008017518 | Feb 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008021021 | Feb 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008022486 | Feb 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008025097 | Mar 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008027534 | Mar 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008037902 | Apr 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008043849 | Apr 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008044150 | Apr 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008046069 | Apr 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008049183 | May 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008051608 | May 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008053487 | May 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008054747 | May 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008056915 | May 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008057642 | May 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008059048 | May 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008061240 | May 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008062049 | May 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008064222 | May 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008064341 | May 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008067043 | Jun 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008071767 | Jun 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008073617 | Jun 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008074025 | Jun 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008074891 | Jun 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008076844 | Jun 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008080630 | Jul 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008080631 | Jul 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008090008 | Jul 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008092910 | Aug 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008092935 | Aug 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008095886 | Aug 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008095887 | Aug 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008095888 | Aug 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008095889 | Aug 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008095910 | Aug 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008095911 | Aug 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008095916 | Aug 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008095919 | Aug 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008095969 | Aug 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008095970 | Aug 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008095972 | Aug 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008096138 | Aug 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008100353 | Aug 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008104598 | Sep 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008110522 | Sep 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008110848 | Sep 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008111779 | Sep 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008112019 | Sep 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008112613 | Sep 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008114282 | Sep 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008116829 | Oct 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008118394 | Oct 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008121320 | Oct 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008122406 | Oct 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008122980 | Oct 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008125983 | Oct 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008135206 | Nov 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008135467 | Nov 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008135603 | Nov 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008137108 | Nov 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008138975 | Nov 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008139334 | Nov 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008142034 | Nov 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008142036 | Nov 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008142146 | Nov 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008142163 | Nov 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008145629 | Dec 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008145675 | Dec 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008145761 | Dec 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008148872 | Dec 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008150165 | Dec 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008150473 | Dec 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008151780 | Dec 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008152008 | Dec 2008 | WO |
| WO 2009000736 | Dec 2008 | WO |
| WO 2009000789 | Dec 2008 | WO |
| WO 2009000848 | Dec 2008 | WO |
| WO 2009000876 | Dec 2008 | WO |
| WO 2009003649 | Jan 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009003977 | Jan 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009007091 | Jan 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009009142 | Jan 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009010460 | Jan 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009012467 | Jan 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009013225 | Jan 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009013263 | Jan 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009014665 | Jan 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009015096 | Jan 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009016104 | Feb 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009016212 | Feb 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009016232 | Feb 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009021153 | Feb 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009021548 | Feb 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009034188 | Mar 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009036234 | Mar 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009037279 | Mar 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009037329 | Mar 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009037338 | Mar 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009038581 | Mar 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009040665 | Apr 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009049110 | Apr 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009052242 | Apr 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009054735 | Apr 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009056566 | May 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009060040 | May 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009061776 | May 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009064652 | May 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009065863 | May 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009065912 | May 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009067580 | May 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009068313 | Jun 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009068564 | Jun 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009068588 | Jun 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009073069 | Jun 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009073605 | Jun 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009075860 | Jun 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009077611 | Jun 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009077973 | Jun 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009079508 | Jun 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009079529 | Jun 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009080743 | Jul 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009080802 | Jul 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009083958 | Jul 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009086229 | Jul 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009086850 | Jul 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009091518 | Jul 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009091860 | Jul 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009092009 | Jul 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009092560 | Jul 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009092772 | Jul 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009094401 | Jul 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009094527 | Jul 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009095455 | Aug 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009095641 | Aug 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009095881 | Aug 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009097133 | Aug 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009099906 | Aug 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009102873 | Aug 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009102965 | Aug 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009102978 | Aug 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009105492 | Aug 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009105612 | Aug 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009106596 | Sep 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009108513 | Sep 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009111263 | Sep 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009111627 | Sep 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009112505 | Sep 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009114733 | Sep 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009117448 | Sep 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009117853 | Oct 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009126359 | Oct 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009126462 | Oct 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009127671 | Oct 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009129162 | Oct 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009132057 | Oct 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009132089 | Oct 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009132779 | Nov 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009132850 | Nov 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009134339 | Nov 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009135130 | Nov 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009135810 | Nov 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009141824 | Nov 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009143995 | Dec 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009145290 | Dec 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009148330 | Dec 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009149787 | Dec 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009150170 | Dec 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009150541 | Dec 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009153208 | Dec 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009156360 | Dec 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009158470 | Dec 2009 | WO |
| WO 2010000794 | Jan 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010003065 | Jan 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010003917 | Jan 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010005298 | Jan 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010006010 | Jan 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010006732 | Jan 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010007035 | Jan 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010007495 | Jan 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010007496 | Jan 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010012760 | Feb 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010012796 | Feb 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010019838 | Feb 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010019872 | Feb 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010023186 | Mar 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010023310 | Mar 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010023320 | Mar 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010024976 | Mar 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010025172 | Mar 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010025465 | Mar 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010025466 | Mar 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010025513 | Mar 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010027793 | Mar 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010027799 | Mar 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010027804 | Mar 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010027805 | Mar 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010027808 | Mar 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010027809 | Mar 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010028205 | Mar 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010028456 | Mar 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010031312 | Mar 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010033564 | Mar 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010034652 | Apr 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010034672 | Apr 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010034681 | Apr 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010036764 | Apr 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010036866 | Apr 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010037016 | Apr 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010037228 | Apr 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010037714 | Apr 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010039750 | Apr 2010 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Elbert et al Pflanzenschutz-Nachrichten—58(3), pp. 441-468—2005—Abstract. |
| Buschman et al arthropod management tests 30, F12-2005ABSTRACT—2006:1204685 HCAPLUS # 146:268341. |
| Barry, G., et al., “Inhibitors of Amino Acid Biosynthesis: Strategies for Imparting Glyphosate Tolerance to Crop Plants,” Current Topics in Plant Physiology 7:139-145, American Society of Plant Physiologists, USA (1992). |
| Colby, S., “Calculating Synergistic and Antagonistic Responses of Herbicide Combinations,” Weeds 15(1):20-22, Weeds Science Society of America, USA (1967). |
| Comai, L., et al., “An Altered aroA Gene Product Confers Resistance to the Herbicide Glyphosate,” Science 221(4608):370-371, Highwire Press, American Association for the Advancement of Science, USA (Jul. 1983). |
| Crickmore, N., et al., “Revision of the Nomenclature for the Bacillus thuringiensis Pesticidal Crystal Proteins,” Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews 62(3):807-813, American Society for Microbiology, USA (Sep. 1998). |
| Gasser, C., et al., “Structure, Expression and Evolution of the 5-Enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate Synthase Genes of Petunia and Tomato,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry 263(9): 4280-4289, The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc., USA (Mar. 1988). |
| Malais, M. and Ravensberg, W., ed., Knowing and recognizing: The biology of glasshouse pests and their natural enemies, Revised edition, Koppert B.V., Berkel en Rodenrijs, Netherlands, 3 pages (1992). |
| Moellenbeck, D., et al., “Insecticidal Proteins from Bacillus thuringiensis Protect Corn from Corn Rootworms,” Nature Biotechnology 19:668-672, Nature Publishing Group, New York, USA (Jul. 2001). |
| Schnepf, H. et al., “Characterization of Cry34/Cry35 Binary Insecticidal Proteins from Diverse Bacillus thuringiensis Strain Collections,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology 71(4):1765-1774, American Society for Microbiology, Washington, USA (2005). |
| Shah, D., et al., “Engineering Herbicide Tolerance in Transgenic Plants,” Science 233(4762):478-481, HighWire Press, American Association for the Advancement of Science, USA (Jul. 1986). |
| Tranel, P. and Wright, T., “Resistance of Weeds to ALS-inhibiting Herbicides: What have we learned?,” Weed Science 50(6):700-712, Weed Science Society of America, KS, USA (2002). |
| Unverified English language Abstract of Chinese Patent Publication No. CN 1840655, Esp@cenet Database, 1 page (2006). |
| Unverified English language Abstract of German Patent Publication No. DE 10342673 A1, Esp@cenet Database , 1 page (2005). |
| English language Abstract of Japanese Patent Publication No. JP 2006-304779 A, Japanese Patent Office (JPO), 1 page (2006). |
| Unverified English language abstract of WO 99/57965 A1, Esp@cenet Database, 1 page (1999). |
| Unverified English language abstract of WO 02/02776 A1, Esp@cenet Database, 1 page (2002). |
| Unverified English language abstract of WO 2005/065453 A1, Esp@cenet Database, 1 page (2005). |
| Unverified English language abstract of WO 2005/090578 A1, Esp@cenet Database, 1 page (2005). |
| Unverified English language abstract of WO 2008/0224786 A1, Esp@cenet Database, 1 page (2008). |
| Unverified English language abstract of WO 01/14569 A2, Esp@cenet Database, 1 page (2001). |
| Unverified English language abstract of WO 2008/037902 A1, Esp@cenet Database, 1 page (2008). |
| Unverified English language abstract of WO 2009/065863 A1, Esp@cenet Database, 1 page (2009). |
| Unverified English language abstract of WO 2009/117853 A1, Esp@cenet Database, 1 page (2009). |
| Unverified English language abstract of WO 2009/145290 A1, Esp@cenet Database, 1 page (2009). |
| Bauer, T.A., et al., “Response of Selected Weed Species to Postemergence Imazethapyr and Bentazon,” Weed Tech. 9:236-242, The Weed Science Society of America (1995). |
| Blackshaw, R.E., “HOE-39866 Use in Chemical Fallow Systems,” Weed Tech. 3:420-428, The Weed Science Society of America (1989). |
| Blackshaw, R.E., “Synergistic Mixes of DPX-A7881 and Clopyralid in Canola (Brassica napus),” Weed Tech. 3:690-695, The Weed Science Society of America (1989). |
| Blackshaw, R.E., et al., “Herbicide Combinations for Postemergent Weed Control in Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius),” Weed Tech. 4:97-104, The Weed Science Society of America (1990). |
| Blouin, D.C., et al., “Analysis of Synergistic and Antagonistic Effects of Herbicides Using Nonlinear Mixed-Model Methodology,” Weed Tech. 18:464-472, The Weed Science Society of America (2004). |
| Bradley, P.R., et al., “Response of Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) to Atrazine, Ammonium Sulfate, and Glyphosate,” Weed Tech. 14:15-18, The Weed Science Society of America (2000). |
| Buker, III, R.S., et al., “Confirmation and Control of a Paraquat-Tolerant Goosegrass (Eleusine indica) Biotype,” Weed Tech. 16:309-313, The Weed Science Society of America (2002). |
| Burke, I.C., et al., “CGA-362622 Antagonizes Annual Grass Control with Clethodim,” Weed Tech. 16:749-754, The Weed Science Society of America (2002). |
| Flint, J.L., et al., “Analyzing Herbicide Interactions, A Statistical Treatment of Colby's Method,” Weed Tech. 2:304-309, The Weed Science Society of America (1988). |
| Gillespie, G.R., and Nalewaja, J.D., “Wheat (Triticum aestivum) Response to Triallate Plus Chlorsulfuron,” Weed Tech. 3:20-23, The Weed Science Society of America (1989). |
| Green, J.M., et al., “Metribuzin and Chlorimuron Mixtures for Preemergence Broadleaf Weed Control in Soybeans, Glycine max,” Weed Tech. 2:355-363, The Weed Science Society of America (1988). |
| Harker, K.N., and O'Sullivan, P.A., “Synergistic Mixtures of Sethoxydim and Fluazifop on Annual Grass Weeds,” Weed Tech. 5:310-316, The Weed Science Society of America (1991). |
| Kent, L.M., et al., “Effect of Ammonium Sulfate, Imazapyr, and Environment on the Phytotoxicity of Imazethapyr,” Weed Tech. 5:202-205, The Weed Science Society of America (1991). |
| Kotoula-Syka, E., et al., “Interactions between SAN 582H and Selected Safeners on Grain Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) and Corn (Zea mays),” Weed Tech. 10:299-304, The Weed Science Society of America (1996). |
| Lanclos, D.Y., et al., “Glufosinate Tank-Mix Combinations in Glufosinate-Resistant Rice (Oryza sativa),” Weed Tech. 16:659-663, The Weed Science Society of America (2002). |
| Norris, J.L., et al., “Weed Control from Herbicide Combinations with Three Formulations of Glyphosate,” Weed Tech. 15:552-558, The Weed Science Society of America (2001). |
| Novosel, K.M., et al., “Metolachlor Efficacy as Influenced by Three Acetolactate Synthase-Inhibiting Herbicides,” Weed Tech. 12:248-253, The Weed Science Society of America (1998). |
| Palmer, E.W., et al., “Broadleaf Weed Control in Soybean (Glycine max) with CGA-277476 and Four Postemergence Herbicides,” Weed Tech. 14:617-623, The Weed Science Society of America (2000). |
| Rummens, F.H.A., “An Improved Definition of Synergistic and Antagonistic Effects,” Weed Science 23(1):4-6, The Weed Science Society of America, United States (1975). |
| Salzman, F.P., and Renner, K.A., “Response of Soybean to Combinations of Clomazone, Metribuzin, Linuron, Alachlor, and Atrazine,” Weed Tech. 6:922-929, The Weed Science Society of America (1992). |
| Scott, R.C., et al., “Spray Adjuvant, Formulation, and Environmental Effects on Synergism from Post-Applied Tank Mixtures of SAN 582H with Fluazifop-P, Imazethapyr, and Sethoxydim,” Weed Tech. 12:463-469, The Weed Science Society of America (1998). |
| Shaw, D.R. and Arnold, J.C., “Weed Control from Herbicide Combinations with Glyphosate,” Weed Tech. 16:1-6, The Weed Science Society of America (2002). |
| Snipes, C.E., and Allen, R.L., “Interaction of Graminicides Applied in Combination with Pyrithiobac,” Weed Tech. 10:889-892, The Weed Science Society of America (1996). |
| Sun, Y.-P. & Johnson, E.R., “Analysis of Joint Action of Insecticides Against House Flies”, J. Econ. Entomol. 53:887-892, United States (1960). |
| Tammes, P.M.L., “Isoboles, A Graphic Representation of Synergism in Pesticides,” Neth. J. Plant Path. 70:73-80, Springer, Germany (1964). |
| Wehtje, G. and Walker, R.H., “Interaction of Glyphosate and 2,4-DB for the Control of Selected Morningglory (Ipomoea spp.) Species,” Weed Tech. 11:152-156, The Weed Science Society of America (1997). |
| Zhang, W., et al., “Fenoxaprop Interactions for Barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crusgalli) Control in Rice,” Weed Tech. 19:293-297, The Weed Science Society of America (2005). |
| Buschman, L.L., et al., “Efficacy of Early Season Miticide Applications Against Spider Mites and Yield Response in Corn, 2003B,” Arthropod Management Tests 30:F12 (4 PP), Entomological Society of America, United States (2005). |
| Elbert, A., et al., “Field Development of Oberon® for whitelfy and mite control in vegetable, cotton, corn, strawberries, ornamentals and tea,” Pflanzenschutz Nachrichten Bayer 58(3):441-468, Bayer Leverkussen, Germany (2005. |
| International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/EP2011/050453, European Patent Office, Netherlands, mailed Oct. 7, 2011. |
| Office Action mailed Jul. 6, 2012, in U.S. Appl. No. 12/305,135, Fischer et al., filed Jan. 5, 2010. |
| Office Action mailed Dec. 27, 2012, in U.S. Appl. No. 12/305,135, Fischer et al., filed Jan. 5, 2010. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20110229582 A1 | Sep 2011 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61297395 | Jan 2010 | US |
