Accelerometer caliper while drilling

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6467341
  • Patent Number
    6,467,341
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, April 24, 2001
    23 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 22, 2002
    22 years ago
Abstract
An accelerometer caliper while drilling arrangement comprising a drill bit having an axis of rotation and a gauge region, a caliper tool body, a first accelerometer mounted upon the caliper tool body and arranged to measure acceleration in a first direction, and a second accelerometer mounted upon the caliper tool body and arranged to measure acceleration in a second direction orthogonal to the first direction, wherein the caliper tool body and the drill bit are coupled to one another in such a manner that the first and second accelerometers are mounted in a known relationship to the drill bit.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




1. Field of the Invention




This invention relates to an apparatus for use in accurately determining a wellbore caliper. In particular the invention relates to the determination of wellbore caliper while a drilling process is taking place. In a practical embodiment, this is achieved by using a plurality of orthogonally mounted accelerometers.




2. Description of the Related Art




Typically, a wellbore extending through a formation is not straight, but rather extends in a snake-like fashion through the formation. Such wellbores are often of spiraling form resulting from the rotary motion of the drill bit. However, the wellbore may also take other forms, for example, as a result of the drill bit being deflected from its original path as a result of encountering a change in the structure of the formation through which the wellbore is being drilled. Even wellbores which are regarded as being straight often have variations in deviation and direction. Although these variations may be small, they can still be of significance when completing a wellbore. By way of example, it is usual to line a wellbore of 8½″ diameter using a casing having an outer diameter of 7″. Clearly, if the wellbore is exactly straight, this gives a radial clearance of only ¾″. Obviously, where the wellbore is not exactly straight, then there may (be regions where there is less clearance, or regions where the provisions of such a casing is not practical and other lining techniques may need to be used.




In practice, wellbores are very rarely exactly straight, indeed with the advent of steerable drilling systems highly deviated and horizontal wellbores are widely used in order to enhance reservoir production. The positioning of a completion string such as a wellbore casing within such a wellbore can be a very difficult operation and may result in damage to the completion string. Even where the completion string is not damaged, there is an increased likelihood of impaired production rates.




It will be appreciated from the description above that the geometry and orientation of the wellbore, as well as the way a completion string will sit in the wellbore, play a very important part in determining the effectiveness of the completion during clean up, treatment, cementing/isolation, and production.




A number of techniques are known to permit the measurement of wellbore shape. One such technique involves the use of a tool known as a dipmeter which includes sensors arranged to measure variations in the conductivity of the formation. The dipmeter has calipers arranged to measure the size of the wellbore as the dipmeter passes along the length of the wellbore. Other sensors arranged to measure the deviation and direction of the wellbore may also be provided. In use, the dipmeter is passed along the length of the wellbore and readings are taken using the various sensors. The readings are logged along with the position of the dipmeter at the time the readings are taken and this information is subsequently used to produce a three-dimensional image of the wellbore.




Other tools are also known for use in measuring the shape of the wellbore. For example, a tool known as a borehole geometry tool can be used. A tool of this type is similar to a dipmeter but does not include sensors for measuring formation conductivity. Another tool is an ultrasonic borehole imaging (UBI) tool. This tool is used in conjunction with a general purpose inclinometry tool to generate data representative of the wellbore shape and size which data can, if desired, be used to produce a three-dimensional image of the wellbore.




It will be appreciated that knowledge of what is likely to happen downhole as a completion string is inserted into a wellbore is useful in deciding how to complete a wellbore.




Accurate measurement of the wellbore caliper using the above-described devices can only be achieved after drilling. Measurement while drilling is not practical as it is not possible to determine the absolute position of the tool being used to generate the desired data. Further, where a UBI tool is used, the tool must be rotated relatively slowly as the sensitivity of the tool decreases with increasing speed, making the tool unsuitable for use in a measurement while drilling system.




Measurement of a number of drilling parameters while drilling can be achieved. For example, WO99/36801 describes an arrangement for nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) imaging of a wellbore. Such imaging is useful as it can be used to derive information representative of the porosity, fluid composition, the quantity of moveable fluid and the permeability of the formation being drilled. In order to produce useful data, it is important that the sensor of the arrangement is either stationary or is only moving relatively slowly. Where fast movement is occurring, the results are less useful in determining the values of the parameters as there is an increased risk of significant errors in the results. In order to determine whether or not the NMR readings taken using the tool can be used, the tool is provided with sensors for use in monitoring the motion of the tool. One example of a suitable sensor arrangement is to provide the tool with accelerometers and a suitable control arrangement. The accelerometer readings can be used to produce data representative of the motion of the tool, and the control arrangement can be used to inhibit the production of NMR data when the motion of the tool is such that the NMR readings would be likely to include significant errors. Alternatively, the control arrangement may be arranged to allow the NMR readings to be made to flag the readings that are likely to contain errors.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




According to the present invention there is provided an accelerometer caliper while drilling arrangement comprising a drill bit having an axis of rotation and a gauge region, a caliper tool body, a first accelerometer mounted upon the caliper tool body and arranged to measure acceleration in a first direction, and a second accelerometer mounted upon the caliper tool body and arranged to measure acceleration in a second direction orthogonal to the first direction, wherein the caliper tool body and the drill bit are coupled to one another in such a manner that the first and second accelerometers are mounted in a known relationship to the drill bit.




As the accelerometers are mounted in a known relationship to the drill bit, and as the drill bit defines the edges of the bore, the positions of the accelerometers are known and the acceleration readings taken using the accelerometer can be used to ascertain the shape of the wellbore.




Although as described above, only two orthogonally mounted accelerometers are required, it will be appreciated that if a greater number of accelerometers are provided, then it may be possible to increase the accuracy with which caliper readings can be taken. In a preferred arrangement, three accelerometers are used, but it will be appreciated that the invention is not restricted to arrangements including three accelerometers.




It is thought that the accelerometer caliper while drilling tool will be able to take wellbore caliper diameter measurements with an accuracy of up to about +/−0.06″.




If desired, the caliper tool body may form part of the drill bit.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




The invention will further be described, by way of example, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:





FIG. 1

is a diagrammatic view illustrating a wellbore and bottom hole assembly including an accelerometer caliper while drilling system;





FIG. 2

is a diagrammatic sectional view of part of the caliper while drilling system; and





FIG. 3

is a diagrammatic view of part of an alternative bottom hole assembly.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION AND TIRE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT




The bottom hole assembly (BHA) illustrated, diagrammatically, in

FIG. 1

comprises a drill bit


10


of the rotary drag type which has an axis


12


about which it is rotated, in use, and a gauge region


14


. The gauge region bears against the wall


16


of the wellbore, in use.




The drill bit


10


is mounted upon a caliper tool


18


which comprises a body of diameter slightly smaller than the diameter of the gauge region


14


of the drill bit


10


. As the body


20


is slightly smaller in diameter than the gauge region


14


, it will be appreciated that, when the bottom hole assembly is in a straight part of the wellbore, the tool body


20


is radially spaced from the wall


16


of the wellbore.




The body


20


has mounted thereon three accelerometers or, acceleration sensors


22


. Two of the sensors


22


are mounted at the periphery of the body


20


and lie upon a diameter of the body


20


. These two sensors are denoted by the reference numerals


24


,


26


. It will be appreciated from

FIG. 2

that preferably these sensors


24


,


26


are oppositely orientated with respect to the longitudinal axis


12


relative to one another and a sensitive to lateral acceleration of the body


20


in a first direction


25


, and to be sensitive to angular acceleration of the tool body


20


. Although it is preferred to oppositely mount sensors


24


,


26


it would be appreciated that other mounting orientations are also possible, as indicated by numeral


26




a


, and in certain applications, these alternate orientations may be useful. The third sensor, denoted by reference numeral


28


, is orientated to measure lateral acceleration in a direction


29


perpendicular to, or orthogonal to, the first direction


25


in which the sensors


24


,


26


are sensitive to lateral acceleration.




The tool body


20


is connected to a drill string


30


which supports the bottom hole assembly. If desired, the bottom hole assembly may include a number of other components. For example, it may include a stabilizer


32


, a mud pulse telemetry transmitter


34


and where the system of which the bottom hole assembly fobs part takes the form of a steerable drilling system then the bottom hole assembly may include a bias unit


36


arranged to apply a side loading to the drill bit


10


to cause the formation of a curve in the wellbore (as shown), or it may include a downhole motor for rotating the drill bit, and a bent component positionable, by controlling the angular position of the drill string, to control the direction in which drilling is taking place.




In use, while drilling is taking place, the caliper tool


18


is controlled in such a manner as to produce, sensor readings representative of the accelerations experienced by the tool


18


. By double integration of the sensor readings, the sensor readings can be converted into data representative of the radial position of the tool


18


relative to the wall


16


of the wellbore.




As the tool


18


is physically secured to the drill bit


10


, the positions of the accelerometers


24


relative to the drill bit


10


are known and fixed. If the position of the wall


16


relative to the sensors is known, and the positions of the sensors are known, then the absolute position and shape of the wall


16


of the wellbore can be determined.




The drill bit


10


should normally lie substantially on the axis of the part of the bore being drilled. As described hereinbefore, where the wellbore is straight, the tool


18


should not engage the wall


16


of the wellbore, and so any acceleration of the tool body should be as a result of instructions modifying the drilling parameters, for example changing the direction of drilling, and as these accelerations are expected, they can be accounted for and can, if desired, be used to monitor the effect of alteration of the drilling parameters. If the bottom hole assembly is not located within a straight part of the bore, then the tool body


20


may move into contact with the wall of the borehole. In these circumstances, the sensors will produce signals representative of the accelerations experienced by the tool


18


occurring as a result of the tool body


20


colliding or otherwise engaging with the wall of the wellbore.




In practice, the formation of straight parts of a wellbore occurs relatively infrequently as the rotary motion of the drill bits tends to result in the formation of wellbores of spiral form, and these spiraling wellbores are often regarded as being ‘straight’, even though completion of these parts of the wellbore may be complicated due to their shape. The apparatus described hereinbefore can be used to monitor the formation of these spiraling parts of the wellbore, and the data derived used in determining how completion can best be effected.




As mentioned above, the acceleration readings are double integrated to produce data representative of the positions of the sensors


22


at the time that the accelerations were sensed. As the positions of the sensors


22


are fixed relative to the drill bit, and as some information about the position of the drill bit is known, for example the distance downhole of the drill bit and the fact that it lies on the axis of the wellbore, a three-dimensional image of the wellbore can be derived. Since the drill bit


10


creates and defines the wall


16


of the wellbore as the bit drills, dimensional information of the wall


16


(i.e. the caliper) is readily determined knowing the position information gained from the sensors


22


, and the geometrical relationship between the sensors and the drill bit


10


.




In order to orient the three-dimensional information wall


16


of the wellbore properly in space, other information required. If the wellbore is not vertical, the constant acceleration due to gravity can be derived from the sensor signals. This information is used to align the three-dimensional image angularly, with respect to the longitudinal axis of the wellbore. If the wellbore is vertical, a magnetometer


38


may, be used to angularly align the three-dimensional image. The three-dimensional image must also be located properly along the length of the drill string. This is readily accomplished by monitoring the distance downhole of the drill bit.




The caliper tool


18


may be operated in several ways. In a simple mode of operation, the caliper tool


18


may simply store the acceleration readings for subsequent interpretation once the tool


18


has been returned to the surface. Alternatively, the tool may be arranged to process the data to determine the shape of the bore as the readings are being made. In either case, if desired, the tool


18


may be connected to a system for transmitting data, either in its raw form or its processed form, to the surface to enable an operator to see the shape of the wellbore while the tool


18


is within the wellbore. Typically, such transmission of data could be performed using a mud pulse telemetry technique and the transmitter


34


.




In order to reduce the quantity of data that must be stored or transmitted, the apparatus may be designed or controlled in such a manner as to permit sensor readings to be taken relatively infrequently where it is sensed that the wellbore is relatively straight or where the tool occupies a portion of the wellbore of little interest to the operator, the frequency of taking readings, and hence the quality of the data resolution, increasing when it is sensed that the tool occupies a non-straight portion of the wellbore or the tool is located within a portion of the wellbore of greater interest to the operator.




Although in the description hereinbefore the tool body


20


is of diameter and position such that it does not engage the wellbore when the bottom hole assembly is located within a straight part of the wellbore, this need not be the case. If desired, the tool body could be designed in such a manner as to promote engagement between the tool body and the wall of the wellbore in order to increase the number of positive accelerometer readings. For example, the tool body


20


could be located eccentrically relative to the axis of the drill bit as shown in FIG.


3


. In such circumstances, the shape and position of the tool body must be taken into account when interpreting the sensor readings.




In a modification, rather than mounting the acceleration sensors


22


on a separate caliper tool body


20


secured to the drill bit


10


, the caliper tool body


20


may form part of the drill bit


10


(also as shown in FIG.


3


).




Whereas the present invention has been described in particular relation to the drawings attached hereto, it should be understood that other and further modifications apart from those shown or suggested herein, may be made within the scope and spirit of the present invention.



Claims
  • 1. An accelerometer caliper while drilling device comprising a drill bit having an axis of rotation and a gauge region, a caliper tool body, a first accelerometer mounted upon the caliper tool body and arranged to measure acceleration in a first direction, and a second accelerometer mounted upon the caliper tool body and arranged to measure acceleration in a second direction orthogonal to the first direction, wherein the caliper tool body and the drill bit are coupled to one another in such a manner that the first and second accelerometers are mounted in a known relationship to the drill bit.
  • 2. The accelerometer caliper while drilling device of claim 1, wherein an additional accelerometer is mounted upon the caliper tool body.
  • 3. The accelerometer caliper while drilling device of claim 2, wherein the additional accelerometer is mounted diametrically opposite the first accelerometer.
  • 4. The accelerometer caliper while drilling device of claim 1, wherein at least one of the accelerometers is located at a periphery of the caliper tool body.
  • 5. The accelerometer caliper while drilling device of claim 1, wherein the caliper tool body is located eccentrically relative to the drill bit.
  • 6. The accelerometer caliper while drilling device of claim 1, further comprising a magnetometer.
  • 7. The accelerometer caliper while drilling device of claim 2, wherein the cailper tool body is located eccentrically relative to the drill bit.
  • 8. A bottom hole assembly comprising a drill bit having an axis of rotation and a gauge region, an accelerometer caliper tool body, a first accelerometer mounted upon the caliper tool body, and arranged to measure acceleration in a first direction, and a second accelerometer mounted upon the caliper tool body and arranged to measure acceleration in a second direction orthogonal to the first direction, wherein the caliper tool body and the drill bit are coupled to one another in such a manner that the first and second accelerometers are mounted in a known relationship to the drill bit, a controller/processor arranged to receive signals from the first and second accelerometers and a mud telemetry transmitter arranged to transmit data under the control of the controller/processor.
  • 9. The bottom hole assembly of claim 8, further comprising a magnetometer.
US Referenced Citations (70)
Number Name Date Kind
1819923 Schlumberger Aug 1931 A
1913293 Schlumberger Jun 1933 A
2476137 Doll Jul 1949 A
2524031 Arps Oct 1950 A
2573137 Greer Oct 1951 A
2677790 Arps May 1954 A
2925251 Arps Feb 1960 A
3058532 Alder Oct 1962 A
3345867 Arps Oct 1967 A
3455158 Richter, Jr. et al. Jul 1969 A
4095865 Denison et al. Jun 1978 A
4216536 More Aug 1980 A
4324297 Denison Apr 1982 A
4346591 Evans Aug 1982 A
4445578 Millheim May 1984 A
4445734 Cunningham May 1984 A
4455278 van Nederveen et al. Jun 1984 A
4496203 Meadows Jan 1985 A
4518888 Zabcik May 1985 A
4557538 Chevalier Dec 1985 A
4599904 Fontenot Jul 1986 A
4662458 Ho May 1987 A
4697650 Fontenot Oct 1987 A
4788544 Howard Nov 1988 A
4829489 Rector May 1989 A
4884071 Howard Nov 1989 A
4903245 Close et al. Feb 1990 A
4914433 Galle Apr 1990 A
4958125 Jardine et al. Sep 1990 A
4958517 Maron Sep 1990 A
5058077 Twist Oct 1991 A
5091644 Minette Feb 1992 A
5160925 Dailey et al. Nov 1992 A
5313829 Paslay et al. May 1994 A
5358059 Ho Oct 1994 A
5402677 Paslay et al. Apr 1995 A
5473158 Holenka et al. Dec 1995 A
5475309 Hong et al. Dec 1995 A
5501285 Lamine et al. Mar 1996 A
5507353 Pavone Apr 1996 A
5511037 Randall et al. Apr 1996 A
5513528 Holenka et al. May 1996 A
5550788 Pavone et al. Aug 1996 A
5565624 Deboaisne et al. Oct 1996 A
5581024 Meyer, Jr. et al. Dec 1996 A
5629623 Sezginer et al May 1997 A
5654503 Rasmus Aug 1997 A
5663929 Pavone et al. Sep 1997 A
5705927 Sezginer et al. Jan 1998 A
5720355 Lamine et al. Feb 1998 A
5721376 Pavone et al. Feb 1998 A
5740036 Ahuja et al. Apr 1998 A
5748471 Grande May 1998 A
5842149 Harrell et al. Nov 1998 A
5883583 Kishino Mar 1999 A
5886303 Rodney Mar 1999 A
5899958 Dowell et al. May 1999 A
5923167 Chang et al. Jul 1999 A
5947213 Angle et al. Sep 1999 A
5987385 Varsamis et al. Nov 1999 A
6008646 Griffin et al. Dec 1999 A
6023164 Prammer Feb 2000 A
6057784 Schaaf et al. May 2000 A
6065219 Murphey et al. May 2000 A
6081116 Wu et al. Jun 2000 A
6109372 Dorel et al. Aug 2000 A
6111408 Blades et al. Aug 2000 A
6150822 Hong et al. Nov 2000 A
6158529 Dorel Dec 2000 A
6205851 Jogi Mar 2001 B1
Foreign Referenced Citations (4)
Number Date Country
0558379 May 1996 EP
0728915 Aug 1996 EP
WO9817894 Apr 1998 WO
WO9936801 Jul 1999 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (1)
Entry
Leggett III; Dubinsky; Patterson; Bolshakov; “Field Test Results Demonstrating Improved Real-Time Data Quality in an Advanced LWD Acoustic System”; SPE 71732; 2001 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition held in New Orleans, Louisiana, Sep. 30-Oct. 3, 2001. English.