The present invention relates generally to stabilization of adjacent bony structures of the spine; and more particularly, to an assembly and method for providing anterior and/or lateral access to the disc space of the vertebrae for providing stabilization to the bony structures thereof.
It is widely held that healing and/or structural correction is greatly facilitated when a bone is stabilized in the proper position. Various devices for stabilization of bone are well known and routinely practiced in the medical arts. For example, an abnormal spine can be stabilized using a substantially rigid or semi-rigid interconnecting means (rod or plate) and fastening means (screws, clamps, hooks, claws, anchors, or bolts). Multiple fasteners are placed into the spinal pedicle of each vertebra and linked by at least one interconnecting means. Once in place, these systems substantially immobilize the spine and promote bony fusion (arthrodesis).
With respect to the thoracic spine, it may be afflicted with a variety of ailments, some so severe as to require surgical intervention. A disc herniation may compress the spinal cord and/or nerve roots and cause pain, loss of function, and even complete paralysis of the legs with loss of bowel and bladder control. The correct treatment for such conditions is the removal of the offending discal tissue. However, this has proven both difficult and quite dangerous. When the discs of the thoracic spine are approached posteriorly (from behind), the spinal cord is in the way. To approach the same herniation anteriorly (from the front) requires the very formidable procedure of thoracotomy (cutting open the chest) and moving the heart and lungs out of the way.
Quite recently, surgeons have begun performing these procedures from a lateral approach to the spine (from the side) using fiber optic viewing instruments called thorascopes and numerous small surgical openings through the chest wall (portals) through which various surgical instruments, such as burrs, rongeurs and curettes, may be placed to remove these disc herniations while avoiding formal thoracotomy. Because the discs are very narrow in the thoracic spine and the surgeon is approaching the spine laterally, there is very little space in which to work as the disc is entered. Therefore, the amount of disc removal may be limited. Alternatively, the surgeon might remove the pedicle to gain access to the spinal canal, risking further weakening of the already diseased area.
For a variety of reasons, including the removal of disc material, the thoracic spine may sometimes become unstable (too much motion) at any given level. Historically, this has been treated by fusion, the joining together permanently of the unstable vertebrae via a bridge of bone so as to eliminate all motion at that location. Fusions about the thoracic spine have been performed anteriorly or posteriorly, either procedure being a serious surgical undertaking.
Stability of the spine is required for fusion to occur. For this reason, and for the purpose of correcting spinal deformity, it is often necessary to use hardware to rigidly internally fixate (stabilize) the spine. To date, the only benefit the use of the thorascope has provided in this regard is to allow the previous thoracotomy incision to be somewhat smaller.
Thus, the prior art includes numerous drawbacks which have not been entirely addressed. Traditionally, the surgical techniques for stabilization of bone required large incisions (upwards of 6 cm in length) and a considerable amount of muscle be cut and stripped away (retracted) from the bone for an “open” visualization of the bone and access thereto for the placement of the fasteners and instrument implantation. Although this so-called “open” surgical technique has successfully treated non-unions, instability, injuries and disease of the spine, it is not without disadvantages. Given the invasive nature of this technique, a lengthy healing time and considerable post-operative pain for the patient is common.
With respect to the human lumbar spine, the treatment of discal disease with neural compression has generally been from a posterior (from behind) approach. Lumbar discs are generally quite large, and it only those protrusions occurring posteriorly which compress the neural elements, which are themselves posterior to the discs. These posterior approaches have included both true posterior approaches and posterolateral approaches to the discs. Further, such approaches have been made via open incisions or through percutaneous stab wounds. In the latter case, instruments are inserted through the stab wounds and monitored by the use of radiographic imaging or the use of an endoscopic viewing device. While it is possible to also decompress a posterior disc herniation in the lumbar spine from an anterior approach (from the front), doing so requires the removal of a very substantial portion or all of the disc material in the front and mid portions of the disc, thus leaving that disc and that spinal segment generally unstable. Therefore, such an anterior approach to the lumbar spine has been reserved for those instances where a fusion is to be performed in conjunction with, and following such a disc removal.
Fusion is generally induced with the application of bone or bone like substances between bones to induce bony bridging; such procedures have been performed outside the vertebral bodies and/or between the vertebral bodies, the latter being known as an interbody fusion. Such interbody fusions have been performed from posterior, posterolateral and anterior. Interbody fusion from the posterior approach, while still in use, has been associated with significant complications generally related to the fact that the delicate dural sac and the spine nerves cover the back of the disc space and are, thus, clearly at risk for damage with such an approach. The posterolateral approach has generally been utilized as a compliment to percutaneous discectomy and has consisted of pushing tiny fragments of morselized bone down through a tube and into the disc space.
In anterior interbody spinal fusion, the path of entry of the fusion material into the intervertebral space is per from a straight anterior position. Such an anterior position is achieved in one of two ways. First, by a straight anterior approach which requires that the peritoneal cavity, which contains the intestines and other organs, be punctured twice, once through the front and once through the back on the way to the front of the spine; or secondly, by starting on the front of the abdomen off to one side and dissecting behind the peritoneal cavity on the way to the front of the spine. Regardless of which approach to the front of the spine is used, and apart from the obvious dangers related to the dense anatomy and vital structures in that area, there are at least two major problems specific to the anterior interbody fusion angle of implant insertion itself. First, generally at the L.sub.4 and L.sub.5 discs, the great iliac vessels bifurcate from the inferior vena cava and lie in close apposition to and covering that disc space, making fusion from the front both difficult and dangerous. Secondly, anterior fusions have generally been done by filling the disc space with bone or by drilling across the disc space and then filling those holes with shaped implants. As presently practiced, the preferred method of filling the disc space consists of placing a ring of allograft (bone not from the patient) femur into that disc space. An attempt to get good fill of the disc space places the sympathetic nerves along the sides of the disc at great risk. Alternatively, when the dowel technique is used, because of the short path from the front of the vertebrae to the back and because of the height of the disc as compared to the width of the spine, only a portion of the cyclindrical implant or implants actually engage the vertebrae; thus compromising the support provided to the vertebrae and the area of contact provided for the fusion to occur.
There is, therefore, in regard to the lumbar spine, a need for a new method and apparatus for achieving interbody fusion which avoids the problems associated all prior methods, and which have included, but are not limited to, nerve damage when performed posteriorly, or the need to mobilize the great iliac vessels when performed anteriorly. Further, the size of the implants is limited by the dural sac posteriorly, and the width of the spine and the delicate vital structures therewith associated anteriorly. Such a method and apparatus for interbody fusion should provide for optimal fill of the interspace without endangering the associated structures, and allow for the optimal area of contact between the implant or implants and the vertebrae to be fused. The method and apparatus should also provide controlled distraction of the bony structures, while also providing ease of access to the damaged area of the spine while minimizing risk to the patient.
Briefly, the present invention is directed to methods and instrumentation for performing surgery on the spine along its lateral aspect (side), and generally by a lateral, anterior or an anterolateral surgical approach, such that the instruments enter the body from an approach that is other than posterior and make contact with the spine along its lateral aspect. The present invention provides for the entire surgical procedure to be performed through a relatively small incision or puncture which may be performed in either the thoracic or lumbar spine.
In the preferred embodiment, the access assembly of the present invention comprises a needle assemble including an elongated handle, the needle assembly having a removable needle member for insertion of a guide wire and a first stage dilator that forms an outer surface of the needle cannula. In at least one embodiment, the first stage dilator feature of the needle assembly may also be utilized for providing additional controlled dilation of the tissue by acting as a guide for additional stages of dilators. A guide wire may be provided for insertion into the disc space through the lumen of the needle assembly with the assistance of x-rays, thorascope, image intensifier, direct vision or the like. For example, for surgery in the thoracic spine, a small incision in the chest cavity of the patient is made from a lateral approach to the thoracic spine. For surgery in the lumbar spine, a small incision may be made in the abdominal wall of the patient. Once positioned, the guide wire extends between the disc space to outside of the patient to provide a guideway for surgical tools and implants. The needle assembly includes an inner needle member and a cannula which are secured together with the elongated handle member through a split shoulder connection which allows an anvil area on the distal end of the needle member suitable for striking with a mallet or the like. The elongated handle includes a U-notch and a rotatable portion for retaining the needle and the cannula in an assembled arrangement. The first stage dilator includes an inner bore sized for cooperation with the outer surface of the cannula member and is preferably integrily formed thereto. The second stage dilator includes an inner bore sized to cooperate with the outer surface of the first stage dilator. In some embodiments, third and fourth stage dilators may be provided. In this manner, each successive dilator acts as a guideway for the next larger dilator.
Once the largest desired dilator tube is in place within the patient, the cannula and guide wire may be removed, providing an access tunnel to the disc space. The inner diameter of the outer dilator, e.g. tunnel, is provided with sufficient diameter for disc modification or removal, as well as the placement of spacers, bone fragments, implants and the like to be passed therethrough to the disc space. In at least one embodiment, the components of the system are constructed to either be constructed from electrically conductive materials or include electrically conductive pathways for use with neurophysiological monitoring equipment. Once the operation is completed, rotation and/or pulling on the dilator releases the dilator tube for removal from the patient.
Accordingly, it is an objective of the present invention to provide a device and method for performing surgery on the thoracic spine through the chest cavity from a lateral approach to the spine.
It is a further objective of the present invention to provide a device and method for performing a thoracic discectomy, an interbody fusion, and rigid internal fixation of the spine through the chest cavity from a lateral approach as a single integrated procedure.
It is yet a further objective of the present invention to provide a device and method for performing a lumbar fusion from the lateral aspect of the spine.
It is another objective of the present invention to provide a method and device for performing a lumbar fusion and spinal canal decompression from the lateral aspect of the spine.
It is yet another objective of the present invention to provide a device and method for performing a lumbar fusion, decompressive discectomy, and a rigid internal fixation of the spine as a single integrated surgical procedure.
It is still yet another objective of the present invention to provide a device and method to achieve discectomy, fusion and interbody stabilization of the lumbar without the need to mobilize the great iliac vessels from the front of the vertebral bodies.
It is still yet another objective of the present invention to provide a device for performing surgery on the spine that includes a needle assembly having a removable handle for locating the proper position related to the bony structure, whereby the handle may be removed for dilation of the entry path providing a tunnel to the surgical site.
It is still yet another objective of the present invention to provide a device for performing surgery on the spine that includes an integrally formed first stage dilator formed onto the outer surface of a needle cannula.
Other objectives and advantages of this invention will become apparent from the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings wherein are set forth, by way of illustration and example, certain embodiments of this invention. The drawings constitute a part of this specification and include exemplary embodiments of the present invention and illustrate various objects and features thereof.
While the present invention is susceptible of embodiment in various forms, there is shown in the drawings and will hereinafter be described a presently preferred embodiment with the understanding that the present disclosure is to be considered an exemplification of the invention and is not intended to limit the invention to the specific embodiments illustrated.
Referring generally to
The first dilator tube (68) is generally an elongated tubular member having a first end (70), a central portion (74) and a second end (72). Extending through the central portion (74) of the dilator tube is a central aperture (76) sized for cooperation with the outer surface (78) of the center portion (80) of the cannula (26). The second dilator tube (16) is generally an elongated tubular member having a first end (36), a central port on (40) and a second end (38). Extending through a central portion of the dilator tube (s) is a central aperture (37) sized for cooperation with the outer surface of the central portion (74) of the first dilator tube (68). Any number of successive dilator tubes may be provided without departing from the scope of the invention. The first end (36), (70) of the dilator tubes (16), (68) preferably includes a tapered or rounded first end (36), (70) for ease of insertion into the issue leading to the disc space. In a most preferred embodiment, the tapered first end (36), (70) includes a rounded shape. However, it should be noted that other shapes may be utilized for the rounded end so long as they provide a smooth transition from the outer diameter of the guide wire cannula to the outer diameter of the dilator. Such shapes may include, but should not be limited to spherical, bullet, pyramid or suitable combinations thereof. The first dilator tube (68) is preferably secured directly about the outer surface of the cannula (26), while each successive dilator tube is constructed and arranged to fit snugly about the outer diameter of the prior dilator tube. The outer surface (60) of each respective dilator tube (16) is preferably round to act as a guide surface for the next successive dilator tube. However, it should be noted that other matched shapes may be utilized without departing from the scope of the invention. Such matched shapes may include, but should not be limited to ovals, polygons and the like. It should also be noted that in at least one embodiment, the components of the system are constructed to either be constructed from electrically conductive materials or include electrically conductive pathways for use with neurophysiological monitoring equipment (82) as is known in the art.
Referring to
All patents and publications mentioned in this specification are indicative of the levels of those skilled in the art to which the invention pertains. All patents and publications are herein incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each publication was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference.
It is to be understood that while a certain form of the invention is illustrated, it is not to be limited to the specific form or arrangement herein described and shown. It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various changes may be made without departing from the scope of the invention, and the invention is not to be considered limited to what is shown and described in the specification.
One skilled in the art will readily appreciate that the present invention is well adapted to carry out the objectives and obtain the ends and advantages mentioned, as well those inherent therein. The embodiments, methods, procedures and techniques described herein are presently representative of the preferred embodiments, are intended to be exemplary, and are not intended as limitations on the scope. Changes therein and other uses will occur to those skilled in the art which are encompassed within the spirit of the invention and are defined by the scope of the appended claims. Although the invention has been described in connection with specific preferred embodiments, it should be understood that the invention as claimed should not be unduly limited to such specific embodiments. Indeed, various modifications of the described modes for carrying out the invention which are obvious to those skilled in the art are intended to be within the scope of the following claims.
In accordance with 37 C.F.R. 1.76, a claim of priority is included in an Application Data Sheet filed concurrently herewith. Accordingly, the present invention claims priority as a continuation to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/274,723, entitled “ACCESS ASSEMBLY FOR ANTERIOR AND LATERAL SPINAL PROCEDURES”, fled Sep. 23, 2016, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/232,021, entitled “ACCESS ASSEMBLY FOR ANTERIOR AND LATERAL SPINAL PROCEDURES”, filed Sep. 24, 2015. The contents of which the above referenced application is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3750667 | Pshenichny et al. | Aug 1973 | A |
4580563 | Gross | Apr 1986 | A |
5013318 | Spranza, III | May 1991 | A |
5484437 | Michelson | Jan 1996 | A |
5741253 | Michelson | Apr 1998 | A |
6063088 | Winslow | May 2000 | A |
6228022 | Friesem et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6283966 | Houfburg | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6506151 | Estes et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6589247 | McGahan et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6740091 | Kohrs et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6770074 | Michelson | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6916323 | Kitchens et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
7083623 | Michelson | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7207991 | Michelson | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7244258 | Burkus et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7326214 | Michelson | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7431722 | Michelson | Oct 2008 | B1 |
7491205 | Michelson | Feb 2009 | B1 |
7569054 | Michelson | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7597695 | Schmiel et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7686805 | Michelson | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7686807 | Padget et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7717917 | Kofoed | May 2010 | B2 |
7722619 | Michelson | May 2010 | B2 |
7771475 | Michelson | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7905884 | Simonton et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7909832 | Michelson | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7914530 | Michelson | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7918855 | Michelson | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7955360 | Michelson | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7972365 | Michelson | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7992729 | Labonia, Jr. et al. | Aug 2011 | B1 |
7993347 | Michelson | Aug 2011 | B1 |
7998143 | Michelson | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8066707 | Michelson | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8066709 | Michelson | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8066710 | Estes et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8328716 | Schmieding et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8343189 | Assell et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8372076 | Simonton et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8403841 | Miles et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8449463 | Nunley et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8480676 | Lyon | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8496709 | Schell | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8518087 | Lopez | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8535322 | Powlan | Sep 2013 | B1 |
8617167 | Weisel et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8641719 | Gephart et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8721536 | Marino et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8753345 | McCormack et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8795167 | Ainsworth et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8852243 | Morgenstern Lopez et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
9463052 | Geist | Oct 2016 | B2 |
20020032447 | Weikel | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020077641 | Michelson | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20030032865 | Estes et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030233094 | Squires et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040024408 | Burkus et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040068264 | Treace | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20050143825 | Enayati | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050261681 | Branch | Nov 2005 | A9 |
20050261684 | Shaolian et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060084992 | Michelson | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060200238 | Schmiel et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070055379 | Stone et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070233252 | Kim | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070270875 | Bacher et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080071279 | Bandeira et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080108875 | Kunkel et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080140013 | Kunkel et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080255667 | Horton et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090125030 | Tebbe et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090131986 | Lee et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090138053 | Assell et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090143863 | Perez-Cruet | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090164020 | Janowski et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090171389 | Sankaran | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090216238 | Stark | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090265007 | Colleran | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090306671 | McCormack et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100160984 | Berry et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100174147 | Miles et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100174148 | Miles et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100191241 | McCormack et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100191296 | Lyon | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100198226 | Estes et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100217088 | Heiges et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100241124 | Housman et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100331845 | Foley et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110028791 | Marino et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110032078 | Guziel et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110040154 | Reznik | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110054537 | Miller et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110106186 | Wolfson | May 2011 | A1 |
20110152866 | Knutson | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110196494 | Yedlicka et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110213432 | Geist et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110224742 | Weisel et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110238184 | Zdeblick et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110251461 | Gomez Gonzalez et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120071984 | Michelson | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120172670 | Hamada | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120203071 | Osman | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120232552 | Morgenstern Lopez et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120232658 | Morgenstern Lopez et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120296171 | Lovell et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120323331 | Michelson | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130006364 | McCormack et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130013000 | Ainsworth et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130013070 | McCormack et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130018474 | McCormack et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130023995 | McCormack et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130023996 | McCormack et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130030532 | McCormack et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130103103 | Mire et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130150678 | Miles et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130184771 | Geist | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130190769 | Morgenstern Lopez et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130310943 | McCormack et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130338674 | Geist et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130345667 | Lyon | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130345712 | Geist et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140014360 | Wilson | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140031874 | Kucharzyk et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140067069 | Lopez | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140074170 | Mertens et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140100657 | McCormack et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140100660 | Morgenstern Lopez et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140121467 | Vayser et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140180418 | Janowski et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140214165 | Schell et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20170071588 | Choi | Mar 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO0217206 | Feb 2002 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Unger and Kowitt, “Fight back—iPhone application to fight florida traffic ticket.”, Internet article: http://udm4.com/iPhone/Fight_Back_Florida_T-3957004, (retrieved Mar. 18, 2013). |
Hanna, A., “The Alex Hanna mobile app”, Internet article: http://www.appszoom.com/iphone-apps/reference/alex-hanna-pa_evltp.html, (retrieved Mar. 18, 2013). |
Bensen & Bingham, “24 Hour ticket power traffic ticket attorney”, Las Vegas, Nevada, Internet Article: http://24hourticketpower.com, (retrieved Mar. 18, 2013). |
Ziu, I., “Parking ticket pundit NYC iPhone”, Internet article: http://www.appszoom.com/iphone-apps/utilities/parking-ticket-pundit-nyc_dlhtb.html, (retrieved Mar. 19, 2013). |
Anonymous, “No traffic tickets. How to get out of a traffic ticket! 2.1.7 App for iPad, iPhone . . . ”, Internet article: http://appfinder.lisisoft.com/app/no-traffic-tickets-how-to.html, (retrieved Mar. 18, 2013). |
Anonymous, “Backseat lawyer”, Internet article: http://udm4.com/iPhone/Backseat_Lawyer-3621608, (retrieved Mar. 18, 2013). |
Bharath, M., “Fight your ticket 1.1 App for iPad, iPhone, Medical”, Internet article: http://appfinder.lisisoft.com/app/fight-your-ticket.html, (retrieved Mar. 18, 2013). |
Anonymous, “Pocket attorney app. a lawyer in your pocket”, Internet article: http://pocketattorneyapp.com, (retrieved Mar. 18, 2013). |
Rand, “Babkes law iPhone”, Internet article: http://www.appszoom.com/iphone-apps/business/babkes-law_eumjc.html, (retrieved Mar. 19, 2013). |
TicketDefender LLC, “TicketDefender iPhone”, Internet article: http://www.appszoom.com/iphone-apps/navigation/ticketdefender_efjcs.html, (retrieved Mar. 18, 2013). |
Anonymous, “Don't pay that speeding ticket. How to tight a traffic ticket or moving radar violation”, Internet article: http://www.appszoom.com/iphone-apps/lifestyle/dont-pay-that-speeding-ticket-how-to-fight-a-traffic-ticket-or-moving-radar-violation-in-court-a_dvcmp.html?nav=related. (retrieved Mar. 18, 2013). |
Nextgenmobile, “File my tickets—Android”, Internet article: http://pt.appszoom.com/android_applications/transportation/file-my-tickets_cbhwe.html, (retrieved Mar. 18, 2013). |
JDG, “Fight that ticket—SlideMe v.2.8”, Internet article: http://slideme.org/application/fight-ticket, (retrieved Mar. 18, 2013). |
ticketbust.com, “iTicketBust for iPhone, iPod touch, and iPad on the iTunes app store”, Internet article: https://itunes.apple.com/app/iticketbust/id425364397, (retrieved Mar. 18, 2013). |
Anonymous, “Mr. Ticket traffic ticket attorney mobile app”, Internet article: http://www.mrtickettrafficattorney.com/mrticketmobileapp, (retrieved Mar. 18, 2013). |
Anonymous, “TicketVoid fight your ticket”, Internet article: http://appfinder.lisisoft.com/app/ticket-void-traffic-ticket.html, (retrieved Mar. 18, 2013). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180360489 A1 | Dec 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62232021 | Sep 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15274723 | Sep 2016 | US |
Child | 16113646 | US |