Access control for business process data

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10474837
  • Patent Number
    10,474,837
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, May 17, 2018
    6 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, November 12, 2019
    5 years ago
Abstract
Controlling access to business process data is disclosed. An instance of a first business process object configured to contain business process data of a business process is created. An instance of a second business process object configured to contain business process data of the business process is created. A first access control list is associated with the instance of the first business process object and a second access control list is associated with the instance of the second business process object.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Business Process Management (bpm) software allows businesses to automate their work flow. For example, the steps for requesting a vacation can be captured in a flow that runs on a business process computer system which takes a vacation request as input, calculates if the requested vacation time is available, routes it to the proper approving manager, and, once approved, notifies all relevant associated personnel and posts it on a group calendar. During the execution of the business process, a number of business objects may be created and stored in the computer system to store relevant business process data. In some cases, the different users that interact with the business process will control or have access to the entire process and all of the process's associated data. However, the data involved or associated with a given business processes may have different access requirements depending on the data's nature. For example, in a loan mortgage approval process, an appraiser should not be able to access all of the applicant's financial information despite being able to input the appraisal as part of the business process. It would be beneficial to have access to different business objects associated with a business process be able to be controlled individually for each business object.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Various embodiments of the invention are disclosed in the following detailed description and the accompanying drawings.



FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating an embodiment of a system for controlling access to business process data.



FIG. 2 is a flow diagram illustrating a process for creating and running a business process.



FIG. 3 is a flow diagram illustrating an embodiment of a process for developing a business process.



FIG. 4 is a flow diagram illustrating an embodiment of a process for executing a business process.



FIG. 5 is a flow diagram illustrating an embodiment of a process for creating and storing a business process object instance.



FIG. 6 is a block diagram illustrating an example of an embodiment of a business process instance and business process object instances.



FIG. 7 is a block diagram illustrating an example of an embodiment of a business process instance and business process object instances.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The invention can be implemented in numerous ways, including as a process, an apparatus, a system, a composition of matter, a computer readable medium such as a computer readable storage medium or a computer network wherein program instructions are sent over optical or communication links. In this specification, these implementations, or any other form that the invention may take, may be referred to as techniques. A component such as a processor or a memory described as being configured to perform a task includes both a general component that is temporarily configured to perform the task at a given time or a specific component that is manufactured to perform the task. In general, the order of the steps of disclosed processes may be altered within the scope of the invention.


A detailed description of one or more embodiments of the invention is provided below along with accompanying figures that illustrate the principles of the invention. The invention is described in connection with such embodiments, but the invention is not limited to any embodiment. The scope of the invention is limited only by the claims and the invention encompasses numerous alternatives, modifications and equivalents. Numerous specific details are set forth in the following description in order to provide a thorough understanding of the invention. These details are provided for the purpose of example and the invention may be practiced according to the claims without some or all of these specific details. For the purpose of clarity, technical material that is known in the technical fields related to the invention has not been described in detail so that the invention is not unnecessarily obscured.


Controlling access to business process data is disclosed. During the development of a business process, one or more business process objects that can hold business process data are specified. Each business process object is associated with a potentially different access control list (ACL). When an instance of the business process is created, e.g., upon submission of a vacation request by employee X for dates Y to Z, in the example described above, instances of the one or more business process objects are created and stored in a repository. For each such business process object instance, the corresponding access control list associated with that business process object at business process design time is associated with the business process object instance. Access to each instance of the one or more business process objects is controlled by the access control list that was associated with the business process object instance at the time the business process object instance was created. The access control list indicates a type of access that an application, a user, or a group of users is allowed.


Two different business processes can have associated with it the same type of business process object as another business process. However, each of the two different business processes can associate a potentially different access control list with said business process object, even though said business process object is of the same type for the two different business processes. For example, a vacation request business process may have associated with it an “employee” type of business object, and a purchase order request business process can have a business object of same type “employee” associated with it. In some embodiments, a different ACL may be associated, e.g., at business process design time, with the employee type object in the context of a vacation request than in the context of a purchase order request. For example, a purchasing department worker may be given “read” access to employee objects associated with a purchase order business process instance, but denied access to the same type of object created in the context of a vacation request business process instance. In some embodiments, business process objects associated with one or more business processes are stored in a repository comprising and/or associated with a content management system, and the repository and/or associated content management system manages the function of associating a business process object instance created by an instance of a business process an ACL associated with the business process object at the time the business process was defined (or some other time prior to instantiation of the current business process instance). In some embodiments, the repository and/or associated content management system controls access to the business process object instance, in accordance with the ACL.



FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating an embodiment of a system for controlling access to business process data. In the example shown, a user using computer 100 accesses content management system 102. Content management server 102 includes business process builder 104 which can be used by a developer to create business process 106. When developing business process 106, developer indicates access control associated with any business process object that is used by business process 106. Business process 106, when executed, creates an instance of business process object(s) that are stored in repository 108. In some embodiments, the instance may be a copy of an existing object stored in the repository 108, e.g., a copy of an existing employee object of employee X in the vacation request example given above. In some embodiments, the instance may be created based on an object class or type stored in and/or otherwise associated with repository 108. Repository 108 controls access to the stored instance of any business process object based on the associated access control as specified by the developer to be associated with the business process object.



FIG. 2 is a flow diagram illustrating a process for creating and running a business process. In some embodiments, the process of FIG. 2 is executed in content management server 102. In the example shown, in 200 a business process is developed. A developer using an application running as part of a content management system develops a business process. A business process includes a defined number of steps that manipulate data that is stored in a business process object. The data may either by entered by end users interacting with the system manually or can be received from other applications. For example, a process to create a purchase order includes entering customer information, entering purchase order details of what is being purchased by the customer, and entering the employee information that is creating the purchase order. In this case, the process has a number of steps that require entering data that is stored as a customer information object, a purchase order object, and an employee information object. Or for example, a process to create a vacation request includes entering desired vacation information and entering the employee information that is requesting the vacation. In this second case, the process also has a number of steps that require entering data that is stored. The data being a desired vacation information object and an employee information object.


In 202, the business process is executed. An instance of the business process is created and run. The instance of the business process creates a set associated business process objects that hold data.



FIG. 3 is a flow diagram illustrating an embodiment of a process for developing a business process. In some embodiments, the process of FIG. 3 is used to implement 200 of FIG. 2. In the example shown, in 300 a business process object is defined. The business process object holds data for a business process where the steps of the business process may read, write, edit, or delete data associated with the business process object. In 302, an access control list is associated with the business process object. The access control list indicates a type of access that an application, a user, or a group will be allowed to have to the business process object. Access can be specified as a permission or restriction including one or more of the following: none, browse, read, relate (e.g., link to other objects), version, write, change location, change owner, change state, change permission, delete, execute, annotate, approve, or any other appropriate access to the business process object. The ACL can also specify a permission or a restriction for an application, a user, or a group of users. The ACL can also specify that the accessing party is required to be a specific application, a specific user, or a specific group of users. Similarly, access can also be restricted if the accessing party is a specific application, a specific user, or a specific group of users. In 304, it is determined if there are more objects. If there are, control passes to 300 where a next business process object is defined. If there are not, control passes to 306.


In 306, a business process step is defined that may edit one or more instances of one or more business process objects. For example, a new DSL Service Business process includes steps to: 1) submit DSL service form; 2) assign work order to DSL technician (manual step); 3) wait for 10 business days for any complaints; 4) charge credit card; and 5) end business process. The DSL service form step of the business process includes entering customer information into a customer business process object, credit card information into a credit card business process object, and order details into an order details business process object. Each of these objects has different access control lists associated with them (as indicated during the development process). For example, the customer business process object may be read and written by a customer service representative, but only read by an installation technician; the credit card business process object may be read and written by a customer service representative, but no access is available for an installation technician; and, the order details business process object may be read and written by a customer service representative, and also read and written by an installation technician. In 308, it is determined if there are more steps. If there are, then control passes to 306. If not, then in 310 the business process development is completed. Completion includes building a business process or saving the business process.



FIG. 4 is a flow diagram illustrating an embodiment of a process for executing a business process. In some embodiments, the process of FIG. 4 is used to implement 202 of FIG. 2. In the example shown, in 400 an instance of the business process is created. In 401 instances of business objects are created. In 402, the first step of the instance of the business process is selected. In 404, the selected step of the instance of the business process is executed including possibly editing one or more instances of business objects. In 406, it is determined if there are more steps. If so, in 408 a next step is selected and control passes to 404. If not, then the process ends.



FIG. 5 is a flow diagram illustrating an embodiment of a process for creating and storing a business process object instance. In some embodiments, the process of FIG. 5 is used as part of 404 of FIG. 4. In the example shown, in 500 a business object instance is created. In 502, a corresponding access control list is associated with the business process object instance. In some embodiments, the ACL that is associated at 502 with the business process object instance comprises an ACL that was associated at business process design time, or some other time prior to instantiation at 500 of the business process object instance, with the business process object (i.e., the type or class of business object) in the context of the business process an instance of which created the business process object instance. In 504, the business process object instance is stored in a repository configured to allow access according to an access control list. When the business process object instance is accessed (or attempted to be accessed) by any application—for example, search, browsing, etc.—the repository allows or denies access based on the associated access control list.



FIG. 6 is a block diagram illustrating an example of an embodiment of a business process instance and business process object instances. In some embodiments, purchase order process instance 600 of FIG. 6 corresponds to a business process instance as created in 500 of FIG. 5, and purchase order instance 602 and access control list A 606 correspond to a business process object instance along with its corresponding access control list as referred to in 502 of FIG. 5. Similarly, employee instance 604 and customer instance 610 are instances of business process objects each with a corresponding access control list (608 and 612, respectively). In the example shown, purchase order process instance 600 is a business process instance that instantiates a purchase order process. The instance of the process creates associated business process objects (602, 604, and 610) and their associated access control lists (606, 608, and 612). Access control lists for the business process objects are selected based on the access appropriate for the data held in the instance of the business process object. For example, information regarding the purchase authorization level should be able to be edited by a human resource department; however, a requesting employee should not be able to change this field.


Purchase order instance 602 includes information regarding a purchase request—for example, the purchase request date, the requested item, the purchase order number, order date, receive date, paid date, etc. Associated access control list A 606 includes access information indicating read/write/edit access for requesting employee, an accounting department, an ordering department, and a shipping/receiving department so that they can each read, enter, and modify entries of the purchase order.


Employee instance 604 includes information regarding an employee that requested the purchase order—for example, employee name, employee identification number, purchase authority level, etc. Associated access control list B 608 includes access information indicating read access for the ordering and shipping/receiving department so the requestor can be contacted if there are questions regarding the order and read/write/edit/delete access for the human resource department so that the department can modify the employee information.


Vendor instance 610 includes information regarding the vendor from whom the requested purchase is to be made. Associated access control list A 612 has the same specified access as the access control list A 612 associated with purchase order instance 602.



FIG. 7 is a block diagram illustrating an example of an embodiment of a business process instance and business process object instances. In some embodiments, vacation request process instance 700 of FIG. 7 corresponds to a business process instance as created in 500 of FIG. 5, and vacation request instance 702 and access control list C 706 correspond to a business process object instance along with its corresponding access control list as referred to in 502 of FIG. 5. Similarly, employee instance 704 is an instance of a business process object with its corresponding access control list D 708. In the example shown, vacation request process instance 700 is a business process instance that instantiates a vacation request process. The instance of the process creates associated business process objects (702 and 704) and their associated access control lists (706 and 708). Access control lists for the business process objects are selected based on the access appropriate for the data held in the instance of the business process object. For example, information regarding the yearly vacation days accrued should be able to be edited by a human resource department; however, a requesting employee should not be able to change this field. Also, employee instance 704 can be the same type of business process object as employee instance 604. However, the two instances can have different associated access control lists, as in these examples employee instance 704 has access control list D 708 and employee instance 604 has access control list B 608.


Vacation request instance 702 includes information regarding a vacation request—for example, the requested dates, potential conflicts, etc. Associated access control list C 706 includes access information indicating read/write/edit access for the requesting employee and read access for the employee's manager and the human resources department.


Employee instance 704 includes information regarding an employee that requested the vacation—for example, employee name, employee identification number, vacation accrual level, etc. Associated access control list D 708 includes access information indicating read access for the employee so that the requestor can know their own vacation levels available and read/write/edit/delete access for the human resource department so that the department can modify the employee information.


Although the foregoing embodiments have been described in some detail for purposes of clarity of understanding, the invention is not limited to the details provided. There are many alternative ways of implementing the invention. The disclosed embodiments are illustrative and not restrictive.

Claims
  • 1. A method for controlling access to business process data, comprising: configuring a content management system (“CMS”) to store: a first business process, the first business process comprising a definition of a first plurality of steps, the first plurality of steps comprising steps for editing instances of a first business process object and instances of a second business process object created by instances of the first business process;a second business process, the second business process including a definition of a second plurality of steps, the second plurality of steps comprising steps for editing instances of the first business process object and instances of a third business process object created by instances of the second business process;an association defined for the first business process between a first access control list (“ACL”) and the first business process object wherein the first ACL specifies a specific application and a type of access that the specific application has to the first business process object;an association defined for the first business process between a second ACL and the second business process object, wherein the second ACL specifies the specific application and a type of access that the specific application has to the second business process object; andan association defined for the second business process between a third ACL and the first business process object;executing an instance of the first business process in the CMS;creating, by the instance of the first business process, a first instance of the first business process object and an instance of the second business process object, the first instance of the first business process object and the instance of the second business process object configured to contain business process data of the instance of the first business process;associating, by the instance of first business process, the first instance of the first business process object with the first ACL based on the association defined for the first business process between the first ACL and the first business process object;associating, by the instance of first business process, the instance of the second business process object with the second ACL based on the association defined for the first business process between the second ACL and the second business process object;executing an instance of the second business process;creating, by the instance of the second business process, a second instance of the first business process object and an instance of the third business process object, the second instance of the first business process object and the instance of the third business process object configured to contain business process data of the instance of the second business process;associating, by the instance of the second business process, the second instance of the first business process object with the third ACL based on the association defined for the second business process between the third ACL and the first business process object;storing the first instance of the first business process object, the second instance of the first business process object, the instance of the second business process object and the instance of the third business process object in a CMS repository; andusing the CMS to control access to the first instance of the first business process object by the specific application in accordance with the first ACL, to control access to the second instance of the first business process object in accordance with the third ACL, and to control access to the instance of the second business process object by the specific application according to the second ACL.
  • 2. The method as in claim 1, wherein each of the first access control, list and the second access control list is determined prior to the execution of the instance of the first business process and the third access control list is determined prior to the execution of the instance of the second business process.
  • 3. The method as in claim 1, wherein: the association defined for the first business process between the first ACL and the first business process object and the association defined for the first business process between the second ACL and the second business process object are defined during development of the first business process; andthe association defined for the second business process between the third ACL and the first business process object is defined during development of the second business process.
  • 4. The method as in claim 1, wherein each of the first access control list, the second access control list, and third access control list indicates a type of access that a user, or a group of users is allowed.
  • 5. The method as in claim 1, wherein the type of access that the specific application has to the first business process object specifies a permission or a restriction for the specific application.
  • 6. The method as in claim 1, wherein at least one of the first access control list, the second access control list or the third access control list specifies that an accessing party be the specific application, a specific user, or a specific group of users.
  • 7. The method as in claim 1, wherein at least one of the first access control list, the second access control list or the third access control list specifies that access is restricted if an accessing party is the specific application, a specific user, or a specific group of users.
  • 8. The method as in claim 1, wherein at least one of the first access control list or the second access control list includes a permission for the specific application, the permission including one or more of the following: none, browse, read, relate, version, write, change location, change owner, change state, change permission, delete, execute, annotate, or approve.
  • 9. The method as in claim 1, wherein at least one of the first access control list or the second access control list includes a restriction for the specific application, the restriction including one or more of the following: none, browse, read, relate, version, write, change location, change owner, change state, change permission, delete, execute, annotate, or approve.
  • 10. A system for controlling access to business process data, comprising: a processor; anda memory coupled to the processor and storing instructions that are executable by the processor to:configure a content management system (“CMS”) to store: a first business process, the first business process comprising a definition of a first plurality of steps, the first plurality of steps comprising steps for editing instances of a first business process object and instances of a second business process object created by instances of the first business process;a second business process, the second business process including a definition of a second plurality of steps, the second plurality of steps comprising steps for editing instances of the first business process object and instances of a third business process object created by instances of the second business process;an association defined for the first business process between a first access control list (“ACL”) and the first business process object, the first ACL specifying a specific application and a type access that the specific application has to the first business process object;an association defined for the first business process between a second ACL and the second business process object, the second ACL specifying the specific application and a type of access that the specific application has to the second business process object; andan association defined for the second business process between a third ACL and the first business process object;execute an instance of the first business process in the CMS;create, by the instance of the first business process, a first instance of the first business process object and an instance of the second business process object, the first instance of the first business process object and the instance of the second business process object configured to contain business process data of the instance of the first business process;associate, by the instance of first business process, the first instance of the first business process object with the first ACL based on the association defined for the first business process between the first ACL and the first business process object;associate, by the instance of first business process, the instance of the second business process object with the second ACL based on the association defined for the first business process between the second ACL and the second business process object;execute an instance of the second business process;create, by the instance of the second business process, a second instance of the first business process object and an instance of the third business process object that are configured to contain business process data of the instance of the second business process;associate, by the instance of the second business process, the second instance of the first business process object with the third ACL based on the association defined for the second business process between the third ACL and the first business process object;store the first instance of the first business process object, the second instance of the first business process object, the instance of the second business process object and the instance of the third business process object in a CMS repository; anduse the CMS to control access to the first instance of the first business process object by the specific application in accordance with the first ACL, to control access to the second instance of the first business process object in accordance with the third ACL, and to control access to the instance of the second business process object by the specific application according to the second ACL.
  • 11. The system of claim 10, wherein each of the first access control list and the second access control list is determined prior to the execution of the instance of the first business process and the third access control list is determined prior to the execution of the instance of the second business process.
  • 12. The system of claim 10 wherein the instructions are further executable to: create the association for the first business process between the first ACL and the first business process object and the association defined for the first business process between the second ACL and the second business process object during development of the first business process; andcreate the association defined for the second business process between the third ACL and the first business process object during development of the second business process.
  • 13. The system of claim 10, wherein each of the first access control list, the second access control list, and third access control list indicates a type of access that a user, or a group of users is allowed.
  • 14. The system of claim 10, wherein the type of access that the specific application has to the first business process object specifies a permission or a restriction for the specific application.
  • 15. The system of claim 10, wherein at least one of the first access control list, the second access control list or the third access control list specifies that an accessing party be the specific application, a specific user, or a specific group of users.
  • 16. The system of claim 10, wherein at least one of the first access control list, the second access control list or the third access control list specifies that access is restricted if an accessing party is the specific application, a specific user, or a specific group of users.
  • 17. The system of claim 10, wherein at least one of the first access control list, the second access control list or the third access control list includes a permission for the specific application, the permission including one or more of the following: none, browse, read, relate, version, write, change location, change owner, change state, change permission, delete, execute, annotate, or approve.
  • 18. The system of claim 10, wherein at least one of the first access control list, the second access control list or the third access control list includes a restriction for the specific application, the restriction including one or more of the following: none, browse, read, relate, version, write, change location, change owner, change state, change permission, delete, execute, annotate, or approve.
  • 19. A computer program product for controlling access to business process data, comprising: a computer readable non-transitory medium storing instructions that are executable by a processor to:configure a content management system (“CMS”) to store: a first business process, the first business process comprising a definition of a first plurality of steps, the first plurality of steps comprising steps for editing instances of a first business process object and instances of a second business process object created by instances of the first business process;a second business process, the second business process including a definition of a second plurality of steps, the second plurality of steps comprising steps for editing instances of the first business process object and instances of a third business process object created by instances of the second business process;an association defined for the first business process between a first access control list (“ACC) and the first business process object, the first ACL specifying a specific application and a type of access that the specific application has to the first business process object;an association defined for the first business process between a second ACL and the second business process object, the second ACL specifying the specific application and the type of access that the specific application has to the second business process object; andan association defined for the second business process between a third ACL and the first business process object;execute an instance of the first business process in the CMS;create, by the instance of the first business process, a first instance of the first business process object and an instance of the second business process object, the first instance of the first business process object and the instance of the second business process object configured to contain business process data of the instance of the first business process;associate, by the instance of first business process, the first instance of the first business process object with the first ACL based on the association defined for the first business process between the first ACL and the first business process object;associate, by the instance of first business process, the instance of the second business process object with the second ACL based on the association defined for the first business process between the second ACL and the second business process object;execute an instance of the second business process;create, by the instance of the second business process, a second instance of the first business process object and an instance of the third business process object that are configured to contain business process data of the instance of the second business process;associate, by the instance of the second business process, the second instance of the first business process object with the third ACL based on the association defined for the second business process between the third ACL and the first business process object;store the first instance of the first business process object, the second instance of the first business process object, the instance of the second business process object and the instance of the third business process object in a CMS repository; anduse the CMS to control access to the first instance of the first business process object by the specific application in accordance with the first ACL, to control access to the second instance of the first business process object in accordance with the third ACL, and to control access to the instance of the second business process object by the specific application according to the second ACL.
  • 20. The computer program product as in claim 19, wherein each of the first access control list and the second access control list is determined prior to execution of the instance of the first business process and the third access control list is determined prior to execution of the instance of the second business process.
CROSS REFERENCE TO OTHER APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/302,913 filed Nov. 22, 2011, entitled ACCESS CONTROL FOR BUSINESS PROCESS DATA, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/644,340 filed Dec. 22, 2006, entitled ACCESS CONTROL FOR BUSINESS PROCESS issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,086,637, which are incorporated herein by reference for all purposes.

US Referenced Citations (110)
Number Name Date Kind
5226161 Khoyi et al. Jul 1993 A
5708812 Van Dyke Jan 1998 A
5764972 Crouse et al. Jun 1998 A
5765153 Benantar et al. Jun 1998 A
5805118 Mishra et al. Sep 1998 A
5845299 Arora et al. Dec 1998 A
5899996 Dysart et al. May 1999 A
5900871 Atkin et al. May 1999 A
5907326 Atkin et al. May 1999 A
5918013 Mighdoll et al. Jun 1999 A
5950198 Falls et al. Sep 1999 A
5987498 Athing et al. Nov 1999 A
6026433 D'arlach et al. Feb 2000 A
6044374 Nesamoney et al. Mar 2000 A
6058366 Tarkiainen et al. May 2000 A
6119130 Nguyen et al. Sep 2000 A
6135646 Kahn Oct 2000 A
6148311 Wishnie et al. Nov 2000 A
6163880 Ramalingam et al. Dec 2000 A
6199077 Inala et al. Mar 2001 B1
6202066 Barkley et al. Mar 2001 B1
6236971 Stefik et al. May 2001 B1
6236996 Bapat et al. May 2001 B1
6292798 Dockter et al. Sep 2001 B1
6327628 Anuff et al. Dec 2001 B1
6338086 Curtis et al. Jan 2002 B1
6345329 Baskey et al. Feb 2002 B1
6351741 Flenniken Feb 2002 B1
6353851 Anupam et al. Mar 2002 B1
6389540 Scheifler et al. May 2002 B1
6453310 Zander Sep 2002 B1
6463535 Drews Oct 2002 B1
6466983 Strazza Oct 2002 B1
6546397 Rempell Apr 2003 B1
6560639 Dan et al. May 2003 B1
6625603 Garg Sep 2003 B1
6643661 Polizzi et al. Nov 2003 B2
6654749 Nashed Nov 2003 B1
6668353 Yurkovic Dec 2003 B1
6714936 Nevin Mar 2004 B1
6745238 Giljum et al. Jun 2004 B1
6772146 Khemlani et al. Aug 2004 B2
6788933 Boehmke et al. Sep 2004 B2
6931546 Kouznetsov et al. Aug 2005 B1
6950943 Bacha et al. Sep 2005 B1
7035825 Sturtevant et al. Apr 2006 B1
7293070 Moses et al. Nov 2007 B2
7340406 Tribble Mar 2008 B1
7350231 Madison et al. Mar 2008 B2
7430587 Malone Sep 2008 B2
7689532 Levy Mar 2010 B1
7801990 Anuff et al. Sep 2010 B2
7984066 Kilday Jul 2011 B1
8086637 Tsai et al. Dec 2011 B1
8407353 Moses et al. Mar 2013 B2
8606916 Moses et al. Dec 2013 B2
9027144 Roustant May 2015 B1
9037739 Moses et al. May 2015 B2
9521046 Anuff et al. Dec 2016 B2
9716751 Moses et al. Jul 2017 B2
9749411 Moses et al. Aug 2017 B2
20020002543 Spooren et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020023147 Kovacs et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020026359 Long et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020029296 Anuff et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020067370 Forney et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020072920 Grianger Jun 2002 A1
20020078168 Christfort et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020078377 Chang et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020083415 Jazdzewski Jun 2002 A1
20020107768 Davis Aug 2002 A1
20020156756 Stanley et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020158899 Raymond Oct 2002 A1
20020178439 Rich et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020184165 Deboer et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020194267 Flesner et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020194347 Koo et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020199123 Mcintyre et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030018964 Fox et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030028610 Pearson Feb 2003 A1
20030034905 Anton et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030041198 Exton et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030046589 Gregg et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030163438 Barnett et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030182656 Leathers et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030187966 Sinha Oct 2003 A1
20030192031 Srinivasan et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030195789 Yen Oct 2003 A1
20040015391 Dupreez et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040162901 Mangipudi et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040167984 Herrmann Aug 2004 A1
20040205042 Ritter et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040220897 Bernhart et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040243640 Bostleman et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050004978 Reed et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050039033 Meyers et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050044396 Vogel et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050114661 Cheng May 2005 A1
20050171833 Jost et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050182963 Phillips et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050223009 Powers et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050289166 Stanley et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060026558 Beringer et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060174334 Perlin et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060195494 Deitrich Aug 2006 A1
20070156418 Richter et al. Jul 2007 A1
20110302211 Kilday et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120072461 Tsai et al. Mar 2012 A1
20170090399 Anuff et al. Mar 2017 A1
20180336520 Davis Nov 2018 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (3)
Number Date Country
WO 2000029927 May 2000 WO
WO 2000034873 Jun 2000 WO
WO 2003025796 Mar 2003 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (61)
Entry
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/644,340, dated May 19, 2010, 16 pgs.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/644,340, dated Oct. 29, 2010, 19 pgs.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/644,340, dated Feb. 10, 2011, 27 pgs.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/644,340, dated Jun. 17, 2011, 34 pgs.
EMC Corporation, Content Server Administrator's Guide, EMC2 documentum, Version 5.3 SP1, Sep. 2005, 654 pgs.
EMC Corporation, Content Server Fundamentals, EMC2 documentum, Version 5.3 SP1, Sep. 2005, 354 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/227,254, filed Sep. 16, 2005, 43 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 60/626,096, filed Nov. 8, 2004, part 1, 144 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 60/626,096, filed Nov. 8, 2004, part 2, 69 pgs.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/302,913, dated Apr. 16, 2013, 65 pgs.
Silver, Bruce, EMC Documentum BPM: Breaking New Ground with Collaboration, Content Awareness, Mar. 2005, 20 pgs.
Fordin, Scott, Documentum FAQ: Common Questions and Concerns About Documentum at NEF, Rev. 1.0, Dec. 2006, 9 pgs.
Salamone, Salvatore, “EMC releases Documentum 5.3,” Techworld, Apr. 5, 2005, 1 pg.
Panjwani, Sunil, et al, “Business Process Services: Technical Overview and Lab,” Documentum Developer Conf., San Ramon, CA, Oct. 2004, 16 pgs.
2006 BPMS Report Series, BPM Institute, Oct. 13, 2005, 1 pg., retrieved from http://web.archive.org/web/20061013185230/https://www.bpminstitute.org/bpmsreport.html.
Bizflow User Guide, Version 9.0, Handysoft Global Corp., Copyright 2004, 363 pgs.
Silver, Bruce, “Documentum BPM: Automating and Integrating Content-Centric Processes,” May 2004, 15 pgs.
Silver, Bruce, The 2006 BPMS Report: IBM WebSphere BPM Suite, v6.0, Mar. 2005, 30 pgs.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/302,913, dated Oct. 17, 2013, 32 pgs.
Fortin, Frederic, Inherence by type and “New Document action”, EMC, May 24, 2005, 5 pgs. retrieved from https://community.emc.com/thread/61515?start=0&start=0 and printed on Aug. 20, 2013.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/302,913, dated Jun. 23, 2014, 45 pgs.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/302,913, dated Oct. 15, 2014, 43 pgs.
Appellant's Brief for U.S. Appl. No. 13/302,913, mailed Apr. 20, 2015, 42 pgs.
Resubmitted Appellant's Brief for U.S. Appl. No. 13/302,913, mailed Jul. 2, 2015, 9 pgs.
Examiner's Answer for U.S. Appl. No. 13/302,913, dated Nov. 4, 2015, 40 pgs.
Definition of “Repository,” American Heritage College Dictionary, 4th Edition, 2 pgs.
Reply Brief for U.S. Appl. No. 13/302,913, mailed Jan. 4, 2016, 6 pgs.
Decision on Appeal for U.S. Appl. No. 13/302,913 mailed Mar. 19, 2018, 11 pgs.
Bruno, et al., “Pebble: A Component-Based Operating System for Embedded Applications,” Proceedings of USENIX Workshop on Embedded Systems, Cambridge, MA, Mar. 29-31, 1999, 11 pgs.
“Iplanet Portal Server 3.0 Overall Architecture” (White Paper); iPlanet e-Commerce Solutions (A Sun/Netscape Alliance), 2000, 28 pgs.
“Solving Real World Business Challenges: DataChannel Enterprise Information Portal Architecture” (Technical White Paper); DataChannel, Inc., 2000, 9 pgs.
“Outlook 2000—Sharing Outlook Components,” Microsoft Office 2000—Online Training, 5 pgs.
“Air Products Gets to Market Faster with Microsoft SharePoint Portal Server,” Microsoft SharePoint Portal Server 2001, Published Jun. 2001, 5 pgs.
“Portal and Knowledge Management Roadmap,” Portal & Knowledge Management Session Code: KB011SN; CA Computer Associates; CA World, 33 pgs.
“Getting Started with WAR Files,” IONA Technologies PLC, IONA/Portal Suite/iPortal Application Server, Mar. 6, 2002, pp. 1-7.
“NT-to-Win2K Migration Tools,” Sep. 2000, Windows 2000 Magazine, Mar. 6, 2002, pp. 1-15.
“Web Browser File Uploading to EAServer,” Greg Douglas, Sybase Principle Consultant, Jan. 15, 2001, pp. 1-5.
“Developing Applications with Jrun,” Allaire Corp., pp. 1 to xxvi, 1-13, 378-413, May 10, 2001.
“Developing Web Applications with ColdFusion,” Allaire Corp., pp. 1 to xiii, 219-230, 1999.
The Delphi Group, “Corporate Portal Architecture: Special Report on Infoimage Freedom,” pp. 1-20, Nov. 1999.
Grosso, P., “XML Fragment interchange, W3C,” www.w3.org/TR/xml-fragment, pp. 1-31, Feb. 12, 2001.
Lie, H.K. et al., “Cascading Style Sheets, Level L,” W3C, www.w3.org/pub/www.TR/REC-CSS1-961217, Dec. 17, 1996, pp. 1-86.
Courter, G. et al., “Mastering Microsoft Office 2000 Professional Edition,” 1999, pp. 1-537.
“Computerworld Companies Turn to Portals for Electronic Business,” News Story by: Julia King.
“Computerworld Epicentric Opens Doors to E-Commerce,” News and Story by Amy Helen Johnson.
Citrix Delphi Group Names Sequoia's XML Portal Server Leading Application for Creating E-Business Portals.
Citrix Sequoia Software Announces New Java-Based Portal Server, XPS for Unix.
Vignette Corporation, Vignette Application Portal, Dec. 2002, pp. 1-17.
Montalbano, “Epicentric Buys Web-Services Tool Company,” Mar. 2, 2001, CRN, San Francisco, CA, 3 pgs.
Epicentric Foundation Server Wins “2001 Product of the Year” award from CMP Media's Transform Magazine, Jan. 7, 2002, 4 pgs.
Epicentric, Inc., Tech Note—Configuring LDAP with Netscape Directory Server 4.1 for Epicentric Foundation Server 3.5—JNDI Full Mode, Mar. 15, 2001, San Francisco, CA.
Emmerich et al., “Implementing Incremental Code Migration with XML,” ACM, pp. 397-406, ICSE 2000.
Schrefl et al., “Self-Maintaining Web Pages—Overview,” pp. 83-90, IEEE 2001.
Padmanabhan et al., “The Content and Access Dynamics of a Busy Web Site: Findings and Implications,” pp. 111-123, ACM 2000.
DataChannel, Looking Under the Hood: DataChannel Server's Intelligent eXtensible Architecture (IXA), DataChannel Server 4.0, pp. 1-12, 2000.
Choi, Byron, “A Few Tips for Good XML Design,” pp. 1-16, Nov. 14, 2000, Philadelphia, PA.
Challenger et al., “A Publishing System for Efficiently Creating Dynamic Web Content,” pp. 844-853, IEEE 2000; IEEEINFOCOM 2000.
Iyengar et al., “High Performance Web Site Design Techniques,” IEEE Internet Computing, pp. 17-26, Mar.-Apr. 2000; http://computer.org/internet/.
Challenger et al., “A Scalable and Highly Available System for Serving Dynamic Data at Frequently Accessed Web Sites,” pp. 1-30, 1998, http://gallifrey.watson.ibm.com/sc98.
Reference (computer science), Wikipedia, Sep. 6, 2010, 5 pgs., at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reference_(computer_science), printed Feb. 17, 2011.
Identity (object-oriented programing), Wikipedia, Nov. 8, 2010, 2 pgs., at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Identity_(object-oriented_programming), printed Feb. 17, 2011.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20180293404 A1 Oct 2018 US
Continuations (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 13302913 Nov 2011 US
Child 15982782 US
Parent 11644340 Dec 2006 US
Child 13302913 US