This invention relates generally to computer networks and more particularly to access control lists in a storage network.
Computing devices are known to communicate data, process data, and/or store data. Such computing devices range from wireless smart phones, laptops, tablets, personal computers (PC), workstations, and video game devices, to data centers that support millions of web searches, stock trades, or on-line purchases every day. In general, a computing device includes a central processing unit (CPU), a memory system, user input/output interfaces, peripheral device interfaces, and an interconnecting bus structure.
As is further known, a computer may effectively extend its CPU by using “cloud computing” to perform one or more computing functions (e.g., a service, an application, an algorithm, an arithmetic logic function, etc.) on behalf of the computer. Further, for large services, applications, and/or functions, cloud computing may be performed by multiple cloud computing resources in a distributed manner to improve the response time for completion of the service, application, and/or function. For example, Hadoop is an open source software framework that supports distributed applications enabling application execution by thousands of computers.
In addition to cloud computing, a computer may use “cloud storage” as part of its memory system. As is known, cloud storage enables a user, via its computer, to store files, applications, etc. on a remote storage system. The remote storage system may include a RAID (redundant array of independent disks) system and/or a dispersed storage system that uses an error correction scheme to encode data for storage.
In a RAID system, a RAID controller adds parity data to the original data before storing it across an array of disks. The parity data is calculated from the original data such that the failure of a single disk typically will not result in the loss of the original data. While RAID systems can address certain memory device failures, these systems may suffer from effectiveness, efficiency and security issues. For instance, as more disks are added to the array, the probability of a disk failure rises, which may increase maintenance costs. When a disk fails, for example, it needs to be manually replaced before another disk(s) fails and the data stored in the RAID system is lost. To reduce the risk of data loss, data on a RAID device is often copied to one or more other RAID devices. While this may reduce the possibility of data loss, it also raises security issues since multiple copies of data may be available, thereby increasing the chances of unauthorized access. In addition, co-location of some RAID devices may result in a risk of a complete data loss in the event of a natural disaster, fire, power surge/outage, etc.
The DSN memory 22 includes a plurality of storage units 36 that may be located at geographically different sites (e.g., one in Chicago, one in Milwaukee, etc.), at a common site, or a combination thereof. For example, if the DSN memory 22 includes eight storage units 36, each storage unit is located at a different site. As another example, if the DSN memory 22 includes eight storage units 36, all eight storage units are located at the same site. As yet another example, if the DSN memory 22 includes eight storage units 36, a first pair of storage units are at a first common site, a second pair of storage units are at a second common site, a third pair of storage units are at a third common site, and a fourth pair of storage units are at a fourth common site. Note that a DSN memory 22 may include more than or less than eight storage units 36. Further note that each storage unit 36 includes a computing core (as shown in
Each of the storage units 36 is operable to store DS error encoded data and/or to execute (e.g., in a distributed manner) maintenance tasks and/or data-related tasks. The tasks may be a simple function (e.g., a mathematical function, a logic function, an identify function, a find function, a search engine function, a replace function, etc.), a complex function (e.g., compression, human and/or computer language translation, text-to-voice conversion, voice-to-text conversion, etc.), multiple simple and/or complex functions, one or more algorithms, one or more applications, maintenance tasks (e.g., rebuilding of data slices, updating hardware, rebooting software, restarting a particular software process, performing an upgrade, installing a software patch, loading a new software revision, performing an off-line test, prioritizing tasks associated with an online test, etc.), etc.
Each of the computing devices 12-16, the managing unit 18, integrity processing unit 20 and (in various embodiments) the storage units 36 include a computing core 26, which includes network interfaces 30-33. Computing devices 12-16 may each be a portable computing device and/or a fixed computing device. A portable computing device may be a social networking device, a gaming device, a cell phone, a smart phone, a digital assistant, a digital music player, a digital video player, a laptop computer, a handheld computer, a tablet, a video game controller, and/or any other portable device that includes a computing core. A fixed computing device may be a computer (PC), a computer server, a cable set-top box, a satellite receiver, a television set, a printer, a fax machine, home entertainment equipment, a video game console, and/or any type of home or office computing equipment. Note that each of the managing unit 18 and the integrity processing unit 20 may be separate computing devices, may be a common computing device, and/or may be integrated into one or more of the computing devices 12-16 and/or into one or more of the storage units 36.
Each interface 30, 32, and 33 includes software and hardware to support one or more communication links via the network 24 indirectly and/or directly. For example, interface 30 supports a communication link (e.g., wired, wireless, direct, via a LAN, via the network 24, etc.) between computing devices 14 and 16. As another example, interface 32 supports communication links (e.g., a wired connection, a wireless connection, a LAN connection, and/or any other type of connection to/from the network 24) between computing devices 12 and 16 and the DSN memory 22. As yet another example, interface 33 supports a communication link for each of the managing unit 18 and the integrity processing unit 20 to the network 24.
Computing devices 12 and 16 include a dispersed storage (DS) client module 34, which enables the computing device to dispersed storage error encode and decode data (e.g., data object 40) as subsequently described with reference to one or more of
In operation, the managing unit 18 performs DS management services. For example, the managing unit 18 establishes distributed data storage parameters (e.g., vault creation, distributed storage parameters, security parameters, billing information, user profile information, etc.) for computing devices 12-14 individually or as part of a group of user devices. As a specific example, the managing unit 18 coordinates creation of a vault (e.g., a virtual memory block associated with a portion of an overall namespace of the DSN) within the DSN memory 22 for a user device, a group of devices, or for public access and establishes per vault dispersed storage (DS) error encoding parameters for a vault. The managing unit 18 facilitates storage of DS error encoding parameters for each vault by updating registry information of the DSN 10, where the registry information may be stored in the DSN memory 22, a computing device 12-16, the managing unit 18, and/or the integrity processing unit 20.
The managing unit 18 creates and stores user profile information (e.g., an access control list (ACL)) in local memory and/or within memory of the DSN memory 22. The user profile information includes authentication information, permissions, and/or the security parameters. The security parameters may include encryption/decryption scheme, one or more encryption keys, key generation scheme, and/or data encoding/decoding scheme.
The managing unit 18 creates billing information for a particular user, a user group, a vault access, public vault access, etc. For instance, the managing unit 18 tracks the number of times a user accesses a non-public vault and/or public vaults, which can be used to generate per-access billing information. In another instance, the managing unit 18 tracks the amount of data stored and/or retrieved by a user device and/or a user group, which can be used to generate per-data-amount billing information.
As another example, the managing unit 18 performs network operations, network administration, and/or network maintenance. Network operations includes authenticating user data allocation/access requests (e.g., read and/or write requests), managing creation of vaults, establishing authentication credentials for user devices, adding/deleting components (e.g., user devices, storage units, and/or computing devices with a DS client module 34) to/from the DSN 10, and/or establishing authentication credentials for the storage units 36. Network administration includes monitoring devices and/or units for failures, maintaining vault information, determining device and/or unit activation status, determining device and/or unit loading, and/or determining any other system level operation that affects the performance level of the DSN 10. Network maintenance includes facilitating replacing, upgrading, repairing, and/or expanding a device and/or unit of the DSN 10. Examples of storage vault tiering, data migration, and dynamic resource selection for data access operations are discussed in greater detail with reference to
To support data storage integrity verification within the DSN 10, the integrity processing unit 20 (and/or other devices in the DSN 10) may perform rebuilding of ‘bad’ or missing encoded data slices. At a high level, the integrity processing unit 20 performs rebuilding by periodically attempting to retrieve/list encoded data slices, and/or slice names of the encoded data slices, from the DSN memory 22. Retrieved encoded slices are checked for errors due to data corruption, outdated versioning, etc. If a slice includes an error, it is flagged as a ‘bad’ or ‘corrupt’ slice. Encoded data slices that are not received and/or not listed may be flagged as missing slices. Bad and/or missing slices may be subsequently rebuilt using other retrieved encoded data slices that are deemed to be good slices in order to produce rebuilt slices. A multi-stage decoding process may be employed in certain circumstances to recover data even when the number of valid encoded data slices of a set of encoded data slices is less than a relevant decode threshold number. The rebuilt slices may then be written to DSN memory 22. Note that the integrity processing unit 20 may be a separate unit as shown, included in DSN memory 22, included in the computing device 16, and/or distributed among the storage units 36.
The DSN interface module 76 functions to mimic a conventional operating system (OS) file system interface (e.g., network file system (NFS), flash file system (FFS), disk file system (DFS), file transfer protocol (FTP), web-based distributed authoring and versioning (WebDAV), etc.) and/or a block memory interface (e.g., small computer system interface (SCSI), internet small computer system interface (iSCSI), etc.). The DSN interface module 76 and/or the network interface module 70 may function as one or more of the interface 30-33 of
In the present example, Cauchy Reed-Solomon has been selected as the encoding function (a generic example is shown in
The computing device 12 or 16 then disperse storage error encodes a data segment using the selected encoding function (e.g., Cauchy Reed-Solomon) to produce a set of encoded data slices.
Returning to the discussion of
As a result of encoding, the computing device 12 or 16 produces a plurality of sets of encoded data slices, which are provided with their respective slice names to the storage units for storage. As shown, the first set of encoded data slices includes EDS 1_1 through EDS 5_1 and the first set of slice names includes SN 1_1 through SN 5_1 and the last set of encoded data slices includes EDS 1_Y through EDS 5_Y and the last set of slice names includes SN 1_Y through SN 5_Y.
In order to recover a data segment from a decode threshold number of encoded data slices, the computing device uses a decoding function as shown in
In a dispersed storage network, it is natural for some stored data to be of greater importance and/or have different storage requirements than other stored data. Often, the relative importance of a given piece of data is a dynamic property that evolves over time. Likewise, the performance and reliability of storage units and sets of storage units may vary. Some storage sets may be of relatively high performance, while others may be more suitable for long-term reliable storage. Knowing the relative importance, size, frequency of access, etc. of data may be useful when determining appropriate resources for storing the data. As described more fully below in conjunction with the novel examples of
In general, DSN memory 22 stores a plurality of dispersed storage (DS) error encoded data. The DS error encoded data may be encoded in accordance with one or more examples described with reference to
Referring more particularly to
In various examples, each storage pool may be associated with an actual performance level (also referred to as a “delivered performance level”), where the actual performance level includes one or more of an access latency level, an access bandwidth level, a cost level, a storage capacity level, a geographic affiliation, a security level, an availability level, etc. For example, the tier 1 storage pool 90 may be associated with an “active” storage tier requiring a target performance level that includes a relatively low access latency performance level and an average reliability level. As another example, the tier 3 storage pool 94 may be associated with an “inactive” (e.g., archival) storage tier requiring a target performance level that includes allowing a highest access latency performance level and mandating a highest reliability level. As yet another example, the tier 2 storage pool 92 may be associated with a “near line” storage tier requiring a target performance level including an average access latency performance level and an average reliability level.
From time to time, a determination may be made (e.g., by one or more of the storage unit 36, a computing device 16, a managing unit 18, etc.) whether to move slices from a first storage pool to a second storage pool to achieve a better match of required performance and delivered performance when a change is detected in required performance. For example, a determination is made to move slices from a storage pool associated with an active tier level of performance to a storage pool associated with a near line tier level of performance when a frequency of access of the slices falls below an active access threshold level. Detecting a change in required performance may be based on one or more of a storage pool utilization level (e.g., move data slices from a nearly full storage pool to a relatively underutilized storage pool), a number of slice accesses per unit of time (e.g., access frequency level), a timestamp associated with a last data slice access, a revised slice access quality of service goal, an estimated cost of moving slices, an actual quality of service level, etc. Detecting a change in required performance may include one or more of initiating a query, performing a performance test, monitoring historical performance information, detecting data access activity, and receiving a request.
It is noted that two or more of the plurality of tiered storage pools 90-94 may be part a common vault (e.g., a virtual memory block associated with a portion of an overall namespace of the DSN) within the DSN memory 22. Further, a given storage pool may consist of storage units which are relatively new, offer better performance or reliability, utilize speed-optimized communication links, etc. Additionally, one or more vaults or storage pools may be arranged or combined in various ways to provide different storage tiers (including storage tiers using differing dispersed storage error coding function parameters), with associated migration policies that guide movement of data between various storage tiers.
The method continues at step 106 where the processing module selects a target storage pool having a target storage tier. The selecting includes identifying a storage tier with an associated delivered performance level that more favorably matches the required performance level associated with the data. For example, the processing module identifies an “active” storage tier when the required performance level associated with the data better matches the active storage tier performance than a currently utilized storage tier. For instance, a change in required performance level may be detected when a higher access frequency is detected for the data, and a suitable active storage tier is available.
The method continues at step 108 where the processing module determines whether to re-encode the data. Determining whether to re-encode the data may be based on one or more of a storage capacity level of the target storage pool, a utilization level of the target storage pool, and a storage reliability requirement. For example, the processing module determines to re-encode the data when an above-average storage reliability requirement is detected. In another example, the processing module determines to re-encode the data when the dispersed storage error coding function parameters used to generate the encoded data slices differs from the parameters used to store data in the target storage pool (e.g., due to a differing number of storage units in the target storage pool). The method branches to step 116 when the processing module determines to re-encode the data. The method continues to step 110 when the processing module determines not to re-encode the data.
The method continues at step 110, where, for each set of encoded data slices, the processing module retrieves a set of encoded data slices (e.g., generates and sends a set of read slice requests to the storage tier). The method continues at step 112 where the processing module translates slice names associated with the set of encoded data slices from a present storage tier to the target storage tier to produce a set of translated slice names. Translating slice names may be based on one or more of dispersed storage error coding function parameters of the storage tier and dispersed storage error coding function parameters of the target storage tier. For example, the processing module changes a vault identifier (ID) to align the set of translated slice names with the target storage tier. The method continues at step 114 where the processing module facilitates storage (e.g., via write requests) of the set of encoded data slices in the target storage pool utilizing the set of translated slice names. In an example, facilitating storage of the data slices includes generating a set of write requests that includes the set of translated slice names and the set of encoded data slices and outputting the set of write requests to the target storage tier.
When the processing module determines to re-encode the data, the method continues at step 116, where, for each set of encoded data slices, the processing module retrieves at least a decode threshold number of encoded data slices. Retrieving the encoded data slices includes generating a set of read slice requests, outputting the set of read slice requests to the storage tier, and receiving at least the decode threshold number of encoded data slices in response. The method continues at step 118 where the processing module decodes the decode threshold number of encoded data slices to produce a data segment utilizing a first set of dispersed storage error coding function parameters associated with the storage tier.
The method continues at step 120 where the processing module encodes the data segment to produce a set of target data slices utilizing a second set of dispersed storage error coding function parameters associated with the target storage tier. The method continues at step 122 where the processing module generates a set of target slice names in accordance with the second set of dispersed storage error coding function parameters. Generating the set of target slice names can include, for example, utilizing a vault ID associated with the target storage tier and a slice index associated with a pillar width value of the vault. The method continues at step 124 where the processing module facilitates storage (e.g., via write requests) of the set of target data slices in the target storage pool utilizing the target slice names. Facilitating storage of the set of target data slices can include, for example, generating a set of write requests that includes the set of target slice names and a set of target data slices and outputting the set of write requests to the target storage tier.
The computing device 16 is operable to receive the data access request 150 and process the request. Processing the request includes generating a data access response 152 when data affiliated with the data access request 150 is available in a cache memory of the computing device 16. The processing the request further includes generating a plurality of sets of slice access requests 154 and sending the plurality of sets of slice access requests 154 to the DSN memory 22 when the data affiliated with the data access request 150 is not available in the cache memory of the computing device 16. The DSN memory 22 is operable to receive the plurality of sets of slice access requests 154, access the plurality of sets of encoded data slices based on the plurality of sets of slice access requests 154, generate one or more slice access responses 156, and output the one or more slice access responses 156 to the computing device 16. The computing device 16 is further operable to receive the one or more slice access responses 156, further process the one or more slice access responses 156 to generate at least one of a response indicator and data, generate a data access response 152 that includes at least one of the response indicator and the data, and to send the data access response 152 to the user device 14. The sending of the data access response 152 includes outputting the data access response 152 directly to the user device 14 and sending the data access response 152 to the user device 14 via the load balancer 148.
The computing device 16 is further operable to modify the affiliation information based on one or more of a computing device performance level, a request, and a predetermination. For example, the computing device modifies the affiliation information to disassociate an unfavorably performing computing device from an affiliation (e.g., to a data ID) and to associate a more favorably performing computing device in the affiliation. The computing device 16 is further operable to update the cached data indicator based on a status of cached data within the computing device 16. The updating includes indicating that data is included when data is stored in the cache memory of the computing device 16 and indicating that data is excluded when the data is deleted from the cache memory. The indicating includes generating and sending the cached data indicator to at least one of the load balancer and at least one other computing device 16.
The method continues at step 162 where the processing module selects a computing device (e.g., DSN processing unit) based on the DSN address and affiliation information. Selecting the computing device includes at least one of identifying a computing device affiliated with the DSN address when a DSN address is not null and assigning a computing device when the DSN address is null. For example, the processing module assigns a computing device 16 based on a requesting entity ID when the DSN address is null. As another example, the processing module selects computing device 16 when affiliation information indicates that computing device 16 is affiliated with a data address of the request.
The method continues at step 164 where the processing module forwards the data access request to the selected computing device. The method continues at step 166 where the processing module obtains affiliation data. Obtaining the affiliation data includes at least one of generating the affiliation data based on a pattern of requests and retrieving the affiliation data from one or more DSN system units. For example, the processing module generates the affiliation data to affiliate computing device 16 with data ID of 457 when a previous access request to data of data ID of 457 has favorably utilized a computing device 16. The method continues at step 168 where the processing module updates the affiliation information based on the affiliation data. Updating the affiliation information includes at least one of adding new affiliations for new data stored in cache memory for current requesting entities or current data stored in cache memory for new requesting entities and deleting old affiliations when data is deleted from a cache memory of a computing device.
Each storage pool can be associated with a target slice storage performance level. The target slice storage performance level can include one or more of an access latency performance level, an access bandwidth level, a cost level, a storage capacity level, a geographic affiliation, a security level, and an availability level. For example, the local storage pool can be associated with active storage requiring a target slice performance level that includes a lowest access latency performance level and an average reliability level. As another example, the national storage pool 170 can be associated with inactive storage requiring a target slice performance level that includes allowing a highest access latency performance level and mandating a highest reliability level. As yet another example, the regional storage pool 180 can be associated with near line storage requiring a target slice performance level including an average access latency performance level and an average reliability level.
A set of slices can be accessed in at least one storage pool of the plurality of concentric storage pools. For example, a set of slices are generated and initially stored in the plurality of storage units of the local storage pool 190 such that frequent accessing of a set of slices may benefit from a storage performance level associated with the local storage pool 190. As time goes on a storage requirement may change. For example, a frequency of access requirement may lower as time goes on. As such, the set of slices can be transferred to a storage pool at their lines with a lowered frequency of access requirement. For example, the set of slices are transferred from the local storage pool 190 to the regional storage pool 180. As time further goes on, a similar process can repeat such that the set of slices are transferred from the regional storage pool 180 for the national storage pool 170. A similar process can be utilized in a reverse direction. For example, the set of slices can be transferred from the national storage pool to the regional storage pool when the frequency of access requirement increases. As time further goes on, the set of slices can be transferred from the regional storage pool to the local storage pool as the frequency of access requirement further increases.
Resources associated with a storage pool contained within another storage pool can be utilized for storage of slices with the storage pool. For example, any of the storage units of the local storage pool may be utilized in addition to storage units associated with the regional storage pool (e.g., and not the local storage pool) when storing a set of slices in the regional storage pool. Resources can be associated with multiple storage pools based on multiple associations. For example, a plurality of storage units associated with a first local storage pool can also be associated with a second local storage pool. As another example, a plurality of storage units associated with a regional storage pool and a second local storage pool may not be associated with the first local storage pool.
The method begins at step 200, where a processing system (e.g., of a dispersed storage (DS) client module such as the DS client module 34 of
When no modifications have been received for the data within a time period, the method continues at step 204, where the processing system stores the data as another plurality of sets of encoded data slices in an affiliated next level storage pool of storage units. The processing system can indicate that no modifications have been received for the data within the time period when a real-time clock is greater than a timestamp of the frequency of access indicator corresponding to the data ID by a time period threshold. Storing the data can include at least one of generating and storing the other plurality of sets of encoded data slices and retrieving the plurality of sets of encoded data slices from the local storage pool and storing the plurality of sets of encoded data slices in the next level storage pool.
Generating and storing the other plurality of sets of encoded data slices can include obtaining the data, encoding the data utilizing the dispersed storage error coding function and in accordance with dispersed storage error coding function parameters of the next level storage pool to produce the other plurality of sets of encoded data slices, selecting a set of storage units of the next level storage pool, and/or outputting the other plurality of sets of encoded data slices to selected set of storage units of the next level storage pool. Obtaining the data can include retrieving the plurality of sets of encoded data slices from the local storage pool and/or decoding the plurality of sets of encoded data slices utilizing the dispersed storage error coding function and in accordance with the dispersed storage error coding parameters of the local storage pool to reproduce the data.
The method continues at step 206 where the processing system determines whether to delete the data from a storage pool. The determination can be based on one or more of a storage pool identifier associated with storage of the data, a storage pool level (e.g., never delete from the national storage pool when utilizing the national storage pool as a long-term reliable backup), a value of the frequency of access indicator, a current timestamp, a storage pool memory utilization level, a time threshold, a storage pool memory utilization threshold, and/or a cost of storage estimate. For example, the processing system can indicate to delete the data from the local storage pool when the frequency of access indicator indicates that a time period since a last data access is greater than a time threshold. The method can loop back to at least one of the steps where the processing system receives more data, determines whether any modifications have been received to move the data to another storage level, and/or determines whether to delete the data when the processing system determines not to delete the data from the storage pool. The method continues to step 208 when the processing system determines to delete the data from storage pool, which includes deleting the data from the storage pool. Deleting the data can include one or more of verifying that the data is currently stored in another higher-level storage pool and/or requesting deletion of the data from the storage pool when the data is verified to be stored in the other higher-level storage pool.
The method begins at step 210, where a processing system (e.g., of a dispersed storage (DS) client module such as DS client module 34) receives a data retrieval request. Receiving the data retrieval request can include receiving one or more of a requesting entity identifier (ID), a data ID, a mandatory storage pool ID, and a preferred storage pool ID. The method continues at step 212, where the processing system determines whether the data is available from an affiliated local storage pool. This determination can be based on at least one of outputting a read request, outputting a list request, outputting a list digest request, accessing a list, and/or receiving a response.
The method continues at step 214 when the processing system determines that the data is available from the affiliated local storage pool. Step 214 includes retrieving the data from the affiliated local storage pool. Retrieving can include generating a plurality of sets of read slice requests that include a plurality of sets of slice names associated with the data, outputting the plurality of sets of read slice requests to a set of storage units of the affiliated local storage pool, receiving a plurality of at least a decode threshold number of encoded data slices, and/or decoding the plurality of the at least the decode threshold number of encoded data slices to reproduce the data. The method branches to step 220, where the processing system sends the data to the requesting entity.
When the processing system determines that the data is not available from the affiliated local storage pool, after completing step 212, the method continues at step 216, where the processing system retrieves the data from another storage pool. Retrieving the data can include identifying the other storage pool, retrieving the plurality of sets of encoded data slices, and/or decoding the plurality of sets of encoded data slices to reproduce the data. Identifying the other storage pool can be based on at least one of accessing a data to storage pool identifier list, sending a read request, sending a list request, sending a list digest request, and/or receiving a response. For example, the processing system identifies a higher-level storage pool that includes the data, retrieves the slices, and/or decodes the slices to reproduce the data. The method continues at step 218, where the processing system stores the data in the affiliated local storage pool (e.g., since frequency of access has increased). Storing the data can include storing the plurality of sets of encoded data slices in the affiliated local storage pool and/or re-encoding the data to produce a second plurality of encoded data slices for storage in the affiliated local storage pool. The method continues at step 220, where the processing system sends the data to the requesting entity.
The storage unit functions to receive a write request 532 for storing a data object 534, determine whether the data object 534 is a new data object 536 or a revised version 538 of an existing data object, determine a write authority 544, and process the write request 532 for storing the data object 534 in accordance with the write authority 544. The data object 534 may include an encoded data slice of a set of encoded data slices, where a data segment is encoded using a dispersed storage error encoding function to produce the set of encoded data slices.
With regards to receiving the write request 532 for storing the data object 534, the receive module 524 receives, from a requesting entity 518 (e.g., a DS processing unit, another storage unit associated with the storage unit), the write request 532 for storing the data object 534, where the write request includes updated access control list (ACL) information 540 regarding the data object 534 and a name 542 identifying the data object 534. The write request may further include one or more of an identifier of the requesting entity 518 and a signed certificate.
With regards to determining whether the data object 534 is the new data object 536 or the revised version 538 of the existing data object, the determine version module 526 determines whether the data object 534 is the new data object 536 or the revised version 538 of the existing data object. The determine version module 526 determines whether the data object 534 is the new data object 536 or the revised version 538 of the existing data object by interpreting a revision number field of the name 542. The determine version number 526 may output a version 546 to indicate whether the data object 534 is the new data object 536 or the revised version 538 of the existing data object. For example, the determine version module 526 outputs the version 546 to indicate that the data object 534 is the new data object 536 when the revision number field indicates a first revision number.
With regards to determining the write authority 544, the determine write authority module 528 determines the write authority 544 of the requesting entity 518 based on information contained in a locally stored ACL 548 (e.g., permissions retrieved from the memory 522 with regards to which types of requests the identity of the requesting entity 518 is allowed to perform), where the write authority 544 includes, at least one of, authorization to issue a write request for the new data object 536, authorization to issue a write request for the revised version 538 of the existing data object, and authorization to issue updated ACL information 540 regarding the new data object 536 or the revised version 538 of the existing data object.
The write authority 544 may further include a range of permissible revisions for the revised version 538 of the existing data object. For example, the requesting entity 518 is authorized to store revised versions 538 within a range of revisions 1-10 and update the ACL information 548 for the same range. The determine write authority module 528 may further determine the write authority 544 to include an indicator that indicates whether a revision number of the revised version 538 of the existing data object is within the range of permissible revisions.
When the write request 532 is regarding the new data object 536 (e.g., as indicated by version 546), the determine write authority module 528 may further determine that the requesting entity is authorized to issue the write request for the new data object 536 and to issue the updated ACL information 540 regarding the new data object 536. The determine write authority module 528 determines that the requesting entity 518 is authorized to issue the write request 532 for the new data object 536 and to issue the updated ACL information 540 regarding the new data object 536 by extracting the signed certificate from the write request 532 and verifying the signed certificate to establish authorization (e.g., generate the write authority 544) to issue the write request 532 for the new data object 536 and to issue the updated ACL information 540 regarding the new data object 536. The write authority generates the write authority 544 to include an indicator that indicates that the requesting entity is authorized to issue the write request for the new data object 536 and to issue the updated ACL information 540 regarding the new data object 536 when the determine write authority module 528 determines that the requesting entity is authorized to issue the write request for the new data object 536 and to issue the updated ACL information 540 regarding the new data object 536.
With regards to processing the write request 532 for storing the data object 534 in accordance with the write authority 544, when the write request 532 is regarding the revised version 538 of the existing data object and the write authority 544 includes the authority to issue the write request for the revised version 538 of the existing data object and authorization to issue updated ACL information regarding the revised version of the existing data object, the storage module 530 stores the revised version 538 of the existing data object in the memory 522 and updates the access control list 548 in the memory 522 based on the updated ACL information 540. The updating includes at least one of appending and replacing. When the write request 532 is regarding the revised version 538 of the existing data object and the write authority 544 does not include the authority to issue the write request for the revised version of the existing data object, the storage module 530 sends the write request rejection message 550 to the requesting entity 518.
When the revision number is within the range of permissible revisions, as indicated by the write authority 544, the storage module 530 stores the revised version 538 of the existing data object in the memory 522 and updates the access control list 548 in the memory 522 based on the updated ACL information 540. When the revision number is not within the range of permissible revisions, the storage module 530 denies the write request (e.g., no storage, issue an error message, output a write request rejection message 550 to the requesting entity 518).
When the write request 532 is regarding the new data object 536 and when the write authority 544 indicates that that the requesting entity 518 is authorized to issue the write request 532 for the new data object 536 and to issue the updated ACL information 540 regarding the new data object 536, the storage module 530 stores the new data object 536 in the memory 522 and updates the access control list 548 in the memory 522 based on the updated ACL information 540 regarding the new data object 536.
When the write request 532 is regarding the revised version 538 of the existing data object and the write authority 544 includes the authority to issue the write request for the revised version 538 of the existing data object but not the authorization to issue updated ACL information 540 regarding the revised version 538 of the existing data object, the storage module 530 stores the revised version 538 of the existing data object in the memory 522 and accesses a trusted source (e.g., a managing unit, a security server, another storage unit, a DS processing unit, etc.). The accessing is with regards to authenticating the requesting entity's authority to issue the updated ACL information 540 regarding the revised version 538 of the existing data object or obtaining the updated ACL information 540 regarding the revised version 538 of the existing data object. The storage module 530 updates the ACL information 548 in the memory 522 using the updated ACL information 540 when the accessing the trusted source indicates that the requesting entity has authority to issue the updated ACL information 540. Alternatively, the storage module 530 updates the ACL information 548 in the memory 522 using updated ACL information 540 obtained from the trusted source when obtaining the updated ACL information 540 from the trusted source.
The method continues at step 556 where the processing module determines write authority of the requesting entity based on information contained in a locally stored access control list. The write authority includes at least one of authorization to issue a write request for the new data object, authorization to issue a write request for the revised version of the existing data object, and authorization to issue updated ACL information regarding the new data object or the revised version of the existing data object. The write authority may include a range of permissible revisions for the revised version of the existing data object.
When the write request is regarding the revised version of the existing data object and the write authority includes the authority to issue the write request for the revised version of the existing data object and authorization to issue updated ACL information regarding the revised version of the existing data object, the method continues at step 558 where the processing module determines whether a revision number of the revised version of the existing data object is within the range of permissible revisions. Alternatively, when not checking a revision number, the method branches to step 562. When the revision number is within the range of permissible revisions, the method branches to step 562. When the revision number is not within the range of permissible revisions, the method continues to step 560. When the revision number is not within the range of permissible revisions, the method continues at step 560 where the processing module denies the write request. The denying of the write request includes sending a write request rejection message to the requesting entity to deny the request. When the write request is regarding the revised version of the existing data object and the write authority does not include the authority to issue the write request for the revised version of the existing data object, the method continues at step 560 to deny the request.
When the revision number is within the range of permissible revisions, the method continues at step 562 where the processing module stores the revised version of the existing data object (e.g., in a local memory). The method continues at step 564 where the processing module updates an access control list based on the updated ACL information (e.g., overwrites the access control list with the updated ACL information in the local memory).
When the write request is regarding the new data object, the method continues at step 566 where the processing module determines that the requesting entity is authorized to issue the write request for the new data object and to issue the updated ACL information regarding the new data object. The determining that the requesting entity is authorized to issue the write request for the new data object and to issue the updated ACL information regarding the new data object includes extracting a signed certificate from the write request and verifying the signed certificate to establish authorization to issue the write request for the new data object and to issue the updated ACL information regarding the new data object. When fully authorized, the method continues at step 568 where the processing module stores the new data object. The method continues at step 570 where the processing module updates the access control list based on the updated ACL information regarding the new data object.
When the write request is regarding the revised version of the existing data object and the write authority includes the authority to issue the write request for the revised version of the existing data object but not the authorization to issue updated ACL information regarding the revised version of the existing data object, the method continues at step 572 where the processing module stores the revised version of the existing data object. The method continues at step 574 where the processing module accesses a trusted source regarding authenticating the requesting entity's authority to issue the updated ACL information regarding the revised version of the existing data object or obtaining the updated ACL information regarding the revised version of the existing data object.
The method continues at step 576 where the processing module updates the access control list in accordance with the accessing of the trusted source. For example, the processing module utilizes updated ACL information from the requesting entity to update the access control list when the trusted source indicates that the requesting entity has authority to issue the updated ACL information regarding the revised version of the existing data object. As another example, the processing module utilizes updated ACL information obtained from the trusted source to update the access control list.
The registry 600 may be utilized to authorize access requests within at least one of the DSTN and the DSN. At least one of the DSTN sub-registry 602, the one or more vault sub-registries 604, and the one or more storage pool sub-registries 606 may be utilized when authorizing a DSTN access request based on one or more of a requesting entity identifier (ID) associated with the DSTN access request and an access type of the DSTN access request. Utilizing the registry 600 includes identifying the registry 600 and utilizing at least one ACL 586 of the registry 600 to authorize the DSTN access request. For example, the DSTN sub-registry 600 to is identified to authorize a DSTN level access request. The DSTN level access request includes at least one of a create vault request, a delete vault request, a create storage pool request, a delete storage pool request, a create realm request, and a delete realm request. Utilizing the at least one ACL 586 includes identifying the at least one ACL 586 based on the requesting entity ID, retrieving the at least one ACL 586, and determining whether the DSTN access request is authorized based on one or more permissions of the ACL 586. As another example, the vault sub-registry 604 is identified to authorize a vault level access request. The vault level access request includes at least one of a delete object request, an add object request, a modify object request, and a modify permissions request. As another example, the storage pool sub-registry 606 is identified to authorize a storage pool level access request. The storage pool level access request includes a modify storage pool request. Methods of generating and utilizing the registry 600 are discussed in greater detail with reference to
The method continues at step 620 where the processing module retrieves the ACL object. The retrieving includes generating at least a set of read slice requests that includes at least a set of slice names corresponding to the ACL object, outputting the at least the set of read slice requests to the DSTN, retrieving at least a decode threshold number of read slice responses that includes at least a decode threshold number of encoded data slices corresponding to the ACL object, and decoding the at least the decode threshold number of encoded data slices to produce the ACL object.
The method continues at step 622 where the processing module extracts an ACL of one or more ACLs associated with the ACL object. The extracting includes identifying the ACL of the one of more ACLs based on a requesting unit identifier. The method continues at step 624 where the processing module authorizes the DSTN access request based on the ACL. The authorization includes comparing the DSTN access request to permissions of the ACL to determine whether the DSTN access request is authorized.
The method continues at step 636 where the processing module generates a new universally unique identifier (UUID) as a realm UUID entry. The generating may include one or more of generating a random UUID and verifying that UUID has not been used previously (e.g., checking a UUID tombstone list). The method continues at step 638 where the processing module obtains a new realm name as a realm name entry. The obtaining includes at least one of receiving the new realm name, requesting the new realm name, and generating the new realm name as a random name. The method continues at step 640 where the processing module identifies an associated authentication authority as an authentication authority entry. The identifying includes at least one of accessing a certificate authority list, receiving a certificate authority chain, and initiating a query. The method continues at step 642 where the processing module generates an ACL entry to include one or more of the realm UUID entry, a login name, a subject distinguished name, permissions, a signer identifier, and a signature. The login name may include at least one of an identifier associated with an entity of a distributed storage and task network (DSTN) and an anonymous identifier (e.g., wildcard).
The method continues at step 644 where the processing module generates and stores a realm object. The generating includes generating the realm object to include the realm name entry, the realm UUID entry, the authentication authority entry, and the ACL entry. The storing includes encoding the realm object utilizing a dispersed storage error coding function to produce at least one set of encoded data slices and sending the at least one set of encoded data slices to at least one of a distributed storage and task network (DSTN) module and a dispersed storage network memory for storage therein.
The method continues at step 652 where the processing module indicates that the realm has been deleted when the processing module verifies DSTN permissions to delete the realm object. The indicating includes at least one of marking the realm object as deleted in at least one of a list and the realm object, deleting the realm object (e.g., generating and sending delete slice requests to a DSTN module), and indicating a tombstone status associated with a realm UUID such that the UUID is not reused.
The methods described above in conjunction with the computing device 16 and the storage units 36 can alternatively be performed by other modules of the distributed storage network or by other devices (e.g., managing unit 18). For example, any combination of a first module, a second module, a third module, a fourth module, etc. of the computing device and the storage units may perform the method described above. In addition, at least one memory section (e.g., a first memory section, a second memory section, a third memory section, a fourth memory section, a fifth memory section, a sixth memory section, etc. of a non-transitory computer readable storage medium) that stores operational instructions can, when executed by one or more processing modules of one or more computing devices and/or by the storage units of the distributed storage network (DSN), cause the one or more computing devices and/or the storage units to perform any or all of the method steps described above.
It is noted that terminologies as may be used herein such as bit stream, stream, signal sequence, etc. (or their equivalents) have been used interchangeably to describe digital information whose content corresponds to any of a number of desired types (e.g., data, video, speech, text, graphics, audio, etc. any of which may generally be referred to as ‘data’).
As may be used herein, the terms “substantially” and “approximately” provides an industry-accepted tolerance for its corresponding term and/or relativity between items. For some industries, an industry-accepted tolerance is less than one percent and, for other industries, the industry-accepted tolerance is 10 percent or more. Other examples of industry-accepted tolerance range from less than one percent to fifty percent. Industry-accepted tolerances correspond to, but are not limited to, component values, integrated circuit process variations, temperature variations, rise and fall times, thermal noise, dimensions, signaling errors, dropped packets, temperatures, pressures, material compositions, and/or performance metrics. Within an industry, tolerance variances of accepted tolerances may be more or less than a percentage level (e.g., dimension tolerance of less than +/−1%). Some relativity between items may range from a difference of less than a percentage level to a few percent. Other relativity between items may range from a difference of a few percent to magnitude of differences.
As may also be used herein, the term(s) “configured to”, “operably coupled to”, “coupled to”, and/or “coupling” includes direct coupling between items and/or indirect coupling between items via an intervening item (e.g., an item includes, but is not limited to, a component, an element, a circuit, and/or a module) where, for an example of indirect coupling, the intervening item does not modify the information of a signal but may adjust its current level, voltage level, and/or power level. As may further be used herein, inferred coupling (i.e., where one element is coupled to another element by inference) includes direct and indirect coupling between two items in the same manner as “coupled to”.
As may even further be used herein, the term “configured to”, “operable to”, “coupled to”, or “operably coupled to” indicates that an item includes one or more of power connections, input(s), output(s), etc., to perform, when activated, one or more its corresponding functions and may further include inferred coupling to one or more other items. As may still further be used herein, the term “associated with”, includes direct and/or indirect coupling of separate items and/or one item being embedded within another item.
As may be used herein, the term “compares favorably”, indicates that a comparison between two or more items, signals, etc., indicates an advantageous relationship that would be evident to one skilled in the art in light of the present disclosure, and based, for example, on the nature of the signals/items that are being compared. As may be used herein, the term “compares unfavorably”, indicates that a comparison between two or more items, signals, etc., fails to provide such an advantageous relationship and/or that provides a disadvantageous relationship. Such an item/signal can correspond to one or more numeric values, one or more measurements, one or more counts and/or proportions, one or more types of data, and/or other information with attributes that can be compared to a threshold, to each other and/or to attributes of other information to determine whether a favorable or unfavorable comparison exists. Examples of such an advantageous relationship can include: one item/signal being greater than (or greater than or equal to) a threshold value, one item/signal being less than (or less than or equal to) a threshold value, one item/signal being greater than (or greater than or equal to) another item/signal, one item/signal being less than (or less than or equal to) another item/signal, one item/signal matching another item/signal, one item/signal substantially matching another item/signal within a predefined or industry accepted tolerance such as 1%, 5%, 10% or some other margin, etc. Furthermore, one skilled in the art will recognize that such a comparison between two items/signals can be performed in different ways. For example, when the advantageous relationship is that signal 1 has a greater magnitude than signal 2, a favorable comparison may be achieved when the magnitude of signal 1 is greater than that of signal 2 or when the magnitude of signal 2 is less than that of signal 1. Similarly, one skilled in the art will recognize that the comparison of the inverse or opposite of items/signals and/or other forms of mathematical or logical equivalence can likewise be used in an equivalent fashion. For example, the comparison to determine if a signal X>5 is equivalent to determining if −X<−5, and the comparison to determine if signal A matches signal B can likewise be performed by determining −A matches −B or not(A) matches not(B). As may be discussed herein, the determination that a particular relationship is present (either favorable or unfavorable) can be utilized to automatically trigger a particular action. Unless expressly stated to the contrary, the absence of that particular condition may be assumed to imply that the particular action will not automatically be triggered. In other examples, the determination that a particular relationship is present (either favorable or unfavorable) can be utilized as a basis or consideration to determine whether to perform one or more actions. Note that such a basis or consideration can be considered alone or in combination with one or more other bases or considerations to determine whether to perform the one or more actions. In one example where multiple bases or considerations are used to determine whether to perform one or more actions, the respective bases or considerations are given equal weight in such determination. In another example where multiple bases or considerations are used to determine whether to perform one or more actions, the respective bases or considerations are given unequal weight in such determination.
As may be used herein, one or more claims may include, in a specific form of this generic form, the phrase “at least one of a, b, and c” or of this generic form “at least one of a, b, or c”, with more or less elements than “a”, “b”, and “c”. In either phrasing, the phrases are to be interpreted identically. In particular, “at least one of a, b, and c” is equivalent to “at least one of a, b, or c” and shall mean a, b, and/or c. As an example, it means: “a” only, “b” only, “c” only, “a” and “b”, “a” and “c”, “b” and “c”, and/or “a”, “b”, and “c”.
As may also be used herein, the terms “processing module”, “processing circuit”, “processor”, “processing circuitry”, and/or “processing unit” may be a single processing device or a plurality of processing devices. Such a processing device may be a microprocessor, micro-controller, digital signal processor, microcomputer, central processing unit, field programmable gate array, programmable logic device, state machine, logic circuitry, analog circuitry, digital circuitry, and/or any device that manipulates signals (analog and/or digital) based on hard coding of the circuitry and/or operational instructions. The processing module, module, processing circuit, processing circuitry, and/or processing unit may be or may further include memory and/or an integrated memory element, which may be a single memory device, a plurality of memory devices, and/or embedded circuitry of another processing module, module, processing circuit, processing circuitry, and/or processing unit. Such a memory device may be a read-only memory, random access memory, volatile memory, non-volatile memory, static memory, dynamic memory, flash memory, cache memory, and/or any device that stores digital information. Note that if the processing module, module, processing circuit, processing circuitry, and/or processing unit includes more than one processing device, the processing devices may be centrally located (e.g., directly coupled together via a wired and/or wireless bus structure) or may be distributedly located (e.g., cloud computing via indirect coupling via a local area network and/or a wide area network). Further note that if the processing module, module, processing circuit, processing circuitry and/or processing unit implements one or more of its functions via a state machine, analog circuitry, digital circuitry, and/or logic circuitry, the memory and/or memory element storing the corresponding operational instructions may be embedded within, or external to, the circuitry comprising the state machine, analog circuitry, digital circuitry, and/or logic circuitry. Still further note that, the memory element may store, and the processing module, module, processing circuit, processing circuitry and/or processing unit executes, hard coded and/or operational instructions corresponding to at least some of the steps and/or functions illustrated in one or more of the Figures. Such a memory device or memory element can be included in an article of manufacture.
One or more embodiments have been described above with the aid of method steps illustrating the performance of specified functions and relationships thereof. The boundaries and sequence of these functional building blocks and method steps have been arbitrarily defined herein for convenience of description. Alternate boundaries and sequences can be defined so long as the specified functions and relationships are appropriately performed. Any such alternate boundaries or sequences are thus within the scope and spirit of the claims. Further, the boundaries of these functional building blocks have been arbitrarily defined for convenience of description. Alternate boundaries could be defined as long as the certain significant functions are appropriately performed. Similarly, flow diagram blocks may also have been arbitrarily defined herein to illustrate certain significant functionality.
To the extent used, the flow diagram block boundaries and sequence could have been defined otherwise and still perform the certain significant functionality. Such alternate definitions of both functional building blocks and flow diagram blocks and sequences are thus within the scope and spirit of the claims. One of average skill in the art will also recognize that the functional building blocks, and other illustrative blocks, modules and components herein, can be implemented as illustrated or by discrete components, application specific integrated circuits, processors executing appropriate software and the like or any combination thereof.
In addition, a flow diagram may include a “start” and/or “continue” indication. The “start” and “continue” indications reflect that the steps presented can optionally be incorporated in or otherwise used in conjunction with one or more other routines. In addition, a flow diagram may include an “end” and/or “continue” indication. The “end” and/or “continue” indications reflect that the steps presented can end as described and shown or optionally be incorporated in or otherwise used in conjunction with one or more other routines. In this context, “start” indicates the beginning of the first step presented and may be preceded by other activities not specifically shown. Further, the “continue” indication reflects that the steps presented may be performed multiple times and/or may be succeeded by other activities not specifically shown. Further, while a flow diagram indicates a particular ordering of steps, other orderings are likewise possible provided that the principles of causality are maintained.
The one or more embodiments are used herein to illustrate one or more aspects, one or more features, one or more concepts, and/or one or more examples. A physical embodiment of an apparatus, an article of manufacture, a machine, and/or of a process may include one or more of the aspects, features, concepts, examples, etc. described with reference to one or more of the embodiments discussed herein. Further, from figure to figure, the embodiments may incorporate the same or similarly named functions, steps, modules, etc. that may use the same or different reference numbers and, as such, the functions, steps, modules, etc. may be the same or similar functions, steps, modules, etc. or different ones.
Unless specifically stated to the contra, signals to, from, and/or between elements in a figure of any of the figures presented herein may be analog or digital, continuous time or discrete time, and single-ended or differential. For instance, if a signal path is shown as a single-ended path, it also represents a differential signal path. Similarly, if a signal path is shown as a differential path, it also represents a single-ended signal path. While one or more particular architectures are described herein, other architectures can likewise be implemented that use one or more data buses not expressly shown, direct connectivity between elements, and/or indirect coupling between other elements as recognized by one of average skill in the art.
The term “module” is used in the description of one or more of the embodiments. A module implements one or more functions via a device such as a processor or other processing device or other hardware that may include or operate in association with a memory that stores operational instructions. A module may operate independently and/or in conjunction with software and/or firmware. As also used herein, a module may contain one or more sub-modules, each of which may be one or more modules.
As may further be used herein, a computer readable memory includes one or more memory elements. A memory element may be a separate memory device, multiple memory devices, or a set of memory locations within a memory device. Such a memory device may be a read-only memory, random access memory, volatile memory, non-volatile memory, static memory, dynamic memory, flash memory, cache memory, a quantum register or other quantum memory and/or any other device that stores data in a non-transitory manner. Furthermore, the memory device may be in a form of a solid-state memory, a hard drive memory or other disk storage, cloud memory, thumb drive, server memory, computing device memory, and/or other non-transitory medium for storing data. The storage of data includes temporary storage (i.e., data is lost when power is removed from the memory element) and/or persistent storage (i.e., data is retained when power is removed from the memory element). As used herein, a transitory medium shall mean one or more of: (a) a wired or wireless medium for the transportation of data as a signal from one computing device to another computing device for temporary storage or persistent storage; (b) a wired or wireless medium for the transportation of data as a signal within a computing device from one element of the computing device to another element of the computing device for temporary storage or persistent storage; (c) a wired or wireless medium for the transportation of data as a signal from one computing device to another computing device for processing the data by the other computing device; and (d) a wired or wireless medium for the transportation of data as a signal within a computing device from one element of the computing device to another element of the computing device for processing the data by the other element of the computing device. As may be used herein, a non-transitory computer readable memory is substantially equivalent to a computer readable memory. A non-transitory computer readable memory can also be referred to as a non-transitory computer readable storage medium.
One or more functions associated with the methods and/or processes described herein can be implemented in a system that is operable to electronically receive digital data via a wired or wireless communication network and/or to electronically transmit digital data via a wired or wireless communication network. Such receiving and transmitting cannot practically be performed by the human mind because the human mind is not equipped to electronically transmit or receive digital data, let alone to transmit and receive digital data via a wired or wireless communication network.
One or more functions associated with the methods and/or processes described herein can be implemented in a system that is operable to electronically store digital data in a memory device. Such storage cannot practically be performed by the human mind because the human mind is not equipped to electronically store digital data.
One or more functions associated with the methods and/or processes described herein may operate to cause an action by a processing module directly in response to a triggering event—without any intervening human interaction between the triggering event and the action. Any such actions may be identified as being performed “automatically”, “automatically based on” and/or “automatically in response to” such a triggering event. Furthermore, any such actions identified in such a fashion specifically preclude the operation of human activity with respect to these actions—even if the triggering event itself may be causally connected to a human activity of some kind.
While particular combinations of various functions and features of the one or more embodiments have been expressly described herein, other combinations of these features and functions are likewise possible. The present disclosure is not limited by the particular examples disclosed herein and expressly incorporates these other combinations.
The present U.S. Utility patent application claims priority pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 120 as a continuation of U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 17/661,804, entitled “STORAGE POOL TIERING IN A STORAGE NETWORK,” filed May 3, 2022, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 15/819,810, entitled “STORAGE VAULT TIERING AND DATA MIGRATION IN A DISTRIBUTED STORAGE NETWORK,” filed Nov. 21, 2017, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 11,327,674 on May 10, 2022, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 13/869,655, entitled “UPDATING ACCESS CONTROL INFORMATION WITHIN A DISPERSED STORAGE UNIT,” filed Apr. 24, 2013, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 10,178,083 on Jan. 8, 2019, which claims priority pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/655,736, entitled “STORING DATA IN A LAYERED DISTRIBUTED STORAGE AND TASK NETWORK”, filed Jun. 5, 2012, all of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entirety and made part of the present U.S. Utility patent application for all purposes.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61655736 | Jun 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 17661804 | May 2022 | US |
Child | 18942201 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15819810 | Nov 2017 | US |
Child | 17661804 | US | |
Parent | 13869655 | Apr 2013 | US |
Child | 15819810 | US |