The invention pertains to a system comprising at least one access control device with an access authorization reader for a data carrier.
Systems for access control are used, for example, for cable cars and ski lifts. In addition to single trip tickets, daily, weekly and seasonal passes are issued, especially for winter sports, and often for a complex of cable cars and ski lifts throughout an entire region. Considerable price reductions are granted for the longer-term passes compared to the price for individual trips, but the former are not transferable to other persons.
The unauthorized transfer of longer-term tickets is, however, a widespread practice. It often happens, for example, that a skier who has bought a ticket early in the morning discontinues skiing around midday and then gives the card to a friend, or in some cases even to a stranger in the parking lot. Lift operators incur considerable financial losses as a result of this practice. In order to prevent such unauthorized transfers, an identification photo of the buyer is therefore taken and affixed to the ticket when it is purchased, so that ticket collectors can compare the photo on the ticket with the person who is using it. However, processing the photos and affixing them to the tickets is costly and time-consuming, with the result that this is only practical for higher-value tickets, such as weekly or seasonal passes.
Another well-known system is the technique of storing a digitized image of the ticket purchaser in a database, along with identification data for the particular ticket, and installing a device with a display screen at the point of access. The image of the ticket holder is transmitted from the database and displayed on the screen once the identification data for the ticket has been entered by the ticket collector. This allows the control personnel to compare the user with the image on the screen. However, this method of checking is also time-consuming and is considered a serious inconvenience by legitimate ticket holders, so that this access control method can only be implemented in exceptional cases.
Automatic face recognition via photo processing is scarcely applicable for access control systems, and not at all practical for winter sports because of the caps, headbands, goggles, sunglasses, scarves and the like, which cover the face of the skier.
The purpose of the invention is to provide a simple, effective system for controlling non-transferable data carriers for access authorization without unduly inconveniencing access users.
According to the invention, the system consists of one or more access control devices. It can therefore involve any equipment for controlling personal access, such as turnstiles, photoelectric barriers, and the like. An access authorization reader, which permits access upon reading a valid access authorization on the data carrier, is located at the access control device or at each device; it could, for example, control the motor of a motor-actuated turnstile, allowing the user of the data carrier to pass. The access authorization reader can be a contact-type reading device, for example for bar-coded, magnetic or SmartCard data storage media, or a contact-less reading device, such as a wireless RFID transponder. For example, access authorization can be imprinted, or stored on the data storage device at the ticket office at the time of purchase.
The data carrier holds identification data constituting a unique reference or code signal for that particular data carrier. This may consist of visual information, for example alphanumeric data printed on the ticket. The identification data can also be in the form of a barcode or recorded on a magnetic card or SmartCard. For cards with a chip, i.e. contact-type SmartCards or RFID transponders, the identification data can also be the serial number of the chip. The identification data can also be identical with the access authorization data, provided the latter consist of a unique code. The identification data for the data carrier can also be an access authorization reference code that can be retrieved from the database by the access control device.
With the system according to the invention, access can be controlled to any facilities, such as special events, sports stadia or swimming pools. It is, however, especially suited to personal transportation systems, primarily ski lifts, cable cars and similar installations in a ski area. In principle, a variety of these personal transportation systems in a winter sports area can be accessed using one data carrier holding one access authorization. The access authorization readers on the access control equipment for individual ski lifts, funiculars and similar personal transportation systems are connected to a central database, in which for every access the identification data from the particular data carrier and any additional access information are stored, such as the time of access and the identifying data for the access control device in question.
According to the invention, a camera is located at the point of access, which takes a image upon access, preferably of the head and shoulders of the user of the data carrier; the information is then stored in digitized form in the database.
The camera can be a simple Webcam which, for example, can be integrated into the housing of the access authorization reader. The housing need only have a small opening for the lens, so that the camera is practically invisible. The camera is preferably actuated by the access authorization reader while it is reading the data carrier.
Actuation of the camera and storage of the image can take place upon every access. However, this is preferably done only for access with high-value data carrier such as for day passes and similar data carrier authorizing longer-term access, but not for single trip tickets. Also, with longer-term access authorizations the recording and storage of an image of the user of the data carrier need not take place with every access, but only after certain periods, for example once an hour.
According to the invention, the images stored in the database, as well as the identification data for the particular data carrier are matched to each image and, if necessary, any additional access data such as access time and data identifying the particular access control device, can be transferred to, or are retrievable from, one or preferably more terminals with display screens. The terminals can communicate with the database over the Internet for this purpose. In particular, the terminal can be a PC.
The PC or terminal operator can visually compare on screen the image of the user of the data carrier that is taken by the camera at the access control device and stored in the database with the image taken earlier of the data carrier user and already stored in the database. This can be an image taken previously by the camera at the access control device, or one of the access control devices. However, the image for visual comparison purposes can also have been taken at another location, for example at the ticket office when the data carrier was purchased, and stored in the database in digital format.
According to the invention, a visual comparison of the images of the user of the particular data carrier takes place at a location remote from that of the access control device. Thus, the user is not aware of the access control with the system according to the invention so that the system according to the invention excludes any feelings of inconvenience on the part of the user.
Since, according to the invention, the database can communicate with several terminals or PCs, a large number of visual comparisons can be carried out in a short time, thereby substantially increasing the reliability and effectiveness of the control process. There is also the advantage that communication via the Internet enables visual comparisons to be made at remote locations such as in so-called “call centers” in other countries.
In order to reduce the number of images for comparison without appreciably reducing the effectiveness of the control process, a computer program is preferably provided, which selects certain of the user images stored in the database for visual comparison on screen.
In this way, only images of users of higher-value data carriers can be selected and transferred for visual comparison, for example only those with weekly or season passes.
It is furthermore possible to perform a behavior analysis for the user of the data carrier, specifically in relation to access times and the access control devices in question, and on this basis, to select which images should be used for comparison.
A typical misuse of a data carrier with non-transferable access authorization, such as a day pass for winter sports, is the situation where the first user, who bought the ticket early in the morning, travels to the higher altitudes using a ski lift, cable car or similar means, spends the morning there and around midday returns to the valley in order to pass on the ticket to someone else, in the parking lot, for example. When the database detects this type of behavior, an image of the user can be taken by the camera at the access control point in the valley, stored in the database, and transferred to the PC for visual control. If the visual comparison on the screen reveals that the image of the user who bought or used the ticket in the morning is not identical with that of the person who wants to use it to access higher elevations from the valley in the afternoon, a misuse of the non-transferable data carrier is established.
The disparity between the images of the users of the same data carrier detected by the terminal operator conducting the visual comparison is transmitted to the database, so that further access to the lifts and cable cars can be denied for the data carrier in question. In other words, further access using the particular data carrier can be blocked or an alarm can be triggered if it is used again. The blockage can be effected by causing the access authorization reader to no longer interpret the particular data carrier as enabling authorized access, so that the turnstile remains locked, for example. An optical and/or acoustic alarm can also be activated when the access authorization reader reads the particular data carrier, so that operators at the access control device can refuse access to the user of the data carrier.
Furthermore, statistical methods can be used to select certain images for visual comparison from among the stored user images. For example, the AQL (Acceptable Quality Level) sampling system, an international quality assurance system, can be utilized to select images of the user. This determines the upper threshold for an acceptable mean quality level.
In order to reduce the amount of data to be processed, the selection program can control the image recording with the camera and/or the image storage in the database from the terminal.
A further advantage is a computer program that locates the head of the data carrier user, and cuts it out, so to speak, so that only a digitized image of the user's head is transmitted or stored, thus reducing the data set accordingly.
Also advantageous is a computer program which registers and stores for comparison purposes the color patterns in the user's clothing, whereby further access can be denied if there are major deviations in the color pattern, by setting off an alarm or automatically blocking access.
Furthermore, a computer program can be provided that positively recognizes and stores biometric characteristics such as facial form for comparison purposes, whereby major deviations can automatically trigger an alarm or block access.
The camera is activated to take an image of the user upon access when the authorized access reader processes the data carrier or when the user moves forward and is detected by sensors.
The invention is explained in greater detail below, with the aid of the attached drawing which shows schematically one embodiment of the system according to the invention.
According to the drawing, a turnstile-form access control device 1 consists of a turnstile with two arms 3 rotating about an axis 2 and an access reading device in a housing 4. A data carrier in the form of a card 8 containing a non-transferable access authorization, such as a barcode, is inserted into the card slot 5 of the access reading device 4. The turnstile rotates once the access reading device 4 has successfully read the access authorization, granting access 6.
When the data carrier 8 is inserted into the slot 5, an image of the user of the data carrier is taken with the camera in the housing 4, of which only the lens 7 is visible. The data carrier is provided with identification data, “125” for example. This identification data, along with the digitized image taken of the user by the camera 7, is stored in a database 9.
The stored image of the user, together with the applicable identification code “125”, can be transferred from the database 9 to terminals with display screens, such as PCs 11 to 13. In this way, a visual comparison between the image of the user of the data carrier in question 8 and an earlier image of the user of the same data carrier is possible using PCs 11 to 13. If the images of the user of the particular data carrier 8 do not correspond with the person's visual appearance, the operator of the PCs 11 to 13 reports this to the database 9 or to other checkpoints via the Internet, and further access for the data carrier 8 can then be blocked.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
04024353 | Oct 2004 | EP | regional |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4581634 | Williams | Apr 1986 | A |
4821118 | Lafreniere | Apr 1989 | A |
5095196 | Miyata | Mar 1992 | A |
5386103 | DeBan et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5432864 | Lu et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5513272 | Bogosian, Jr. | Apr 1996 | A |
5553277 | Hirano et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5594806 | Colbert | Jan 1997 | A |
6128398 | Kuperstein et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6252978 | Grantz | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6311214 | Rhoads | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6522770 | Seder et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6650761 | Rodriguez et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6698653 | Diamond et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6801640 | Okubo et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6801907 | Zagami | Oct 2004 | B1 |
7039237 | Watkins et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7158038 | Fujie | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7183895 | Bazakos et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7212655 | Tumey et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7360695 | Ponert et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7362210 | Bazakos et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7421097 | Hamza et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7631806 | Wallerstorfer et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
20010018660 | Sehr | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010023193 | Rhoads | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010026632 | Tamai | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010031072 | Dobashi et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010032251 | Rhoads et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020016740 | Ogasawara | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020016816 | Rhoads | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020018579 | Rhoads et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020028000 | Conwell et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020032864 | Rhoads et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020033844 | Levy et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020044171 | Hirahara et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020062382 | Rhoads et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020093425 | Puchek et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020112165 | Rhoads et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020131076 | Davis | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020158750 | Almalik | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020164053 | Seder et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020170966 | Hannigan et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020181736 | Seder et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020181737 | Seder et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020191817 | Sato et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030012403 | Rhoads et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030037075 | Hannigan et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030040957 | Rodriguez et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030050961 | Rodriguez et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030056104 | Carr et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030086591 | Simon | May 2003 | A1 |
20030105730 | Rhoads et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030130954 | Carr et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030185423 | Dobashi | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030198368 | Kee | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040017929 | Bramblet et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040056087 | Bonneau et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040086157 | Sukegawa | May 2004 | A1 |
20040128514 | Rhoads | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040153649 | Rhoads et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040190750 | Rodriguez et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040258275 | Ebihara | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050110610 | Bazakos et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050144444 | Hall et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050179553 | Fujie | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050205668 | Sogo | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050212654 | Yoda | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060000144 | Wallerstorfer et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060040679 | Shikano et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060082438 | Bazakos et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060124734 | Wallerstorfer et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060140460 | Coutts | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060167833 | Wallerstorfer | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060181392 | Watson | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060262187 | Takizawa | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070001002 | Ponert et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070181695 | Keshura | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070252001 | Kail et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080004892 | Zucker | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080120909 | Ponert et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0758776 | Feb 1997 | EP |
758776 | Feb 1997 | EP |
0962894 | Dec 1999 | EP |
2002352230 | Dec 2002 | JP |
2005301861 | Oct 2005 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060167833 A1 | Jul 2006 | US |