Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to electrical devices and, more particularly, to electrical devices, such as media players, that receive accessory devices.
Description of the Related Art
A media player stores media assets, such as audio tracks or photos, that can be played or displayed on the media player. One example of a media player is the iPod® media player, which is available from Apple Computer, Inc. of Cupertino, Calif. Often, a media player acquires its media assets from a host computer that serves to enable a user to manage media assets. As an example, the host computer can execute a media management application to manage media assets. One example of a media management application is iTunes®, version 4.2, produced by Apple Computer, Inc.
A media player typically includes one or more connectors or ports that can be used to interface to the media player. For example, the connector or port can enable the media player to couple to a host computer, be inserted into a docking system, or receive an accessory device.
There are today many different types of accessory devices that can interconnect to the media player. For example, a remote control can be connected to the connector or port to allow the user to remotely control the media player. As another example, an automobile can include a connector and the media player can be inserted onto the connector such that an automobile media system can interact with the media player, thereby allowing the media content on the media player to be played within the automobile.
Currently, the connectors or ports of a media player are open for use so long as a compatible connector or port is utilized. Consequently, numerous third-parties have developed accessory devices for use with other manufacturers' media players. One difficulty is that the manufacturer of a media player has no control over the various different accessory devices that can be connected to the media player. This is problematic because third-party accessory devices may be inferior, error-prone, disruptive (e.g., resource draining), or even damaging to the media player itself. Another problem is that third-party accessory devices which are unauthorized by the manufacturer of the media device may attempt to utilize features of the media device in an inappropriate or undesired manner.
Thus, there is a need for improved techniques to enable manufacturers of electronic devices to control the nature and extent to which accessory devices can be utilized with their electronic devices.
Broadly speaking, the invention pertains to improved techniques to control utilization of accessory devices with electronic devices. The improved techniques can use cryptographic approaches to authenticate electronic devices, namely, electronic devices that interconnect and communicate with one another.
One aspect of the invention pertains to techniques for authenticating an electronic device, such as an accessory device. Another aspect of the invention pertains to provisioning software features (e.g., functions) by or for an electronic device (e.g., a host device). Different electronic devices can, for example, be provisioned differently depending on different degrees or levels of authentication, or depending on manufacturer or product basis. Still another aspect of the invention pertains to using an accessory (or adapter) to convert a peripheral device (e.g., USB device) into a host device (e.g., USB host). Embodiments of the invention may pertain to one or more of these aspects or other aspects disclosed herein.
The invention can be implemented in numerous ways, including as a method, system, device, apparatus (including graphical user interface), or computer readable medium. Several embodiments of the invention are discussed below.
As a portable electronic device, one embodiment of the invention includes at least: a media storage device that stores media content for one or more media items; a media presentation module that retrieves media content for at least one of the media items from the media storage and causes the media content to be presented for a user of the portable electronic device; an authentication table that stores authentication information for various accessory devices that are authorized to couple to and interact with the portable electronic device; and an authentication module that determines whether a particular accessory device that is coupled to the portable media device is authorized to interoperate with the portable electronic device based on at least a portion of the authentication information stored in the authentication table.
As an accessory device for a portable electronic device, one embodiment of the invention includes at least: an input/output port for interacting with the portable electronic device; an authentication algorithm; an authentication key associated with the accessory device; an authentication controller, operatively connected to the input/output port, for performing authentication operations using at least the authentication algorithm and the authentication key; and accessory circuitry that performs operations associated with the accessory device.
As a connector for connecting an accessory device to a media player, one embodiment of the invention includes at least: a connector body; a plurality of electrical contacts attached within the connector body and serving to provide electrical connections between the accessory device and the media player; and a controller disposed in the connector body and providing an authentication key that allows the accessory device to be authenticated by the media player.
As a method for authorizing an accessory device for use with an electronic device, one embodiment of the invention includes at least the acts of: receiving a device identifier from the accessory device; receiving an authentication value from the accessory device; determining whether the accessory device is authentic based on the authentication value; and authorizing usage of the accessory device with the electronic device when it is determined that the accessory device is authentic.
As a method for authorizing an accessory device for use with an electronic device, another embodiment of the invention includes at least the acts of: detecting attachment of the accessory device with the electronic device; sending a random number to the accessory device after attachment of the accessory device has been detected; subsequently receiving an encoded value from the accessory device; receiving a device identifier from the accessory device; obtaining a cryptographic key based on the device identifier; decoding the encoded value using the cryptographic key to produce a decoded value; determining whether the decoded value corresponds to the random number; and authorizing usage of the accessory device with the electronic device when it is determined that the decoded value corresponds to the random number.
As a method for authorizing an accessory device for use with an electronic device, still another embodiment of the invention includes at least the acts of: detecting attachment of the accessory device with the electronic device; sending an authentication request, including at least a random number, to the accessory device after attachment of the accessory device has been detected; subsequently receiving an authentication response from the accessory device, the authentication response being in response to the authentication request, and the authentication response including at least an encoded value and a device identifier for the accessory device; obtaining a cryptographic key based on the device identifier; decoding the encoded value using the cryptographic key to produce a decoded value; and authorizing usage of the accessory device with the electronic device based on a correspondence between the decoded value and the random number.
As a method for authorizing an accessory device for use with an electronic device, still yet another embodiment of the invention includes at least the acts of: receiving a random number from the electronic device; encoding the random number using a cryptographic key provided within the accessory device, thereby producing an encoded value; and sending the encoded value and a device identifier to the electronic device.
As a method for controlling interaction between a media player and an accessory device, one embodiment of the invention includes at least the acts of: determining a classification of the accessory device; identifying an authorization level for the accessory device; and selectively activating features of the media device that are available to be used in conjunction with the accessory device based on the classification and authorization level of the accessory device.
As a media player system, one embodiment of the invention includes at least: a media player storing media content and supporting a plurality of predetermined functions, and an accessory device capable of connecting to the media player. The media player and the accessory device interact to perform an authentication process and, based on the authentication process, specific functions of the media device are selectively activated and thus available for use by the accessory device.
Other aspects and advantages of the invention will become apparent from the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings which illustrate, by way of example, the principles of the invention.
The invention will be readily understood by the following detailed description in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein like reference numerals designate like structural elements, and in which:
The invention pertains to improved techniques to control utilization of accessory devices with electronic devices. The improved techniques can use cryptographic approaches to authenticate electronic devices, namely, electronic devices that interconnect and communicate with one another.
The improved techniques are particularly well suited for electronic devices, such as media devices, that can receive accessory devices. One example of a media device is a media player, such as a hand-held media player (e.g., music player), that can present (e.g., play) media items (or media assets). Examples of accessories for media devices, include: voice recorder, FM transceivers, peripheral bus devices (e.g., FireWire® devices or USB devices), media devices (e.g., media readers, displays, cameras, etc.), power units (e.g., power adapters, battery packs, etc.), speakers (headphones or speaker systems), remote control devices, network devices, or automobile integration units).
One aspect of the invention pertains to techniques for authenticating an electronic device, such as an accessory device. Another aspect of the invention pertains to provisioning software features (e.g., functions) by or for an electronic device (e.g., a host device). Different electronic devices can, for example, be provisioned differently depending on different degrees or levels of authentication, or depending on manufacturer or product basis. Still another aspect of the invention pertains to using an accessory (or adapter) to convert a peripheral device (e.g., USB device) into a host device (e.g., USB host). Embodiments of the invention may pertain to one or more of these aspects or other aspects disclosed herein.
Embodiments of the invention are discussed below with reference to
The accessory authentication system 100 also includes an authentication device 106 having a connector 108 and a connector port 110. The authentication device 106 can be attached to the mobile computing device 102. In particular, when the authentication device 106 is attached to the mobile computing device 102, the connector 108 of the authentication device 106 is received by the connector port 104 of the mobile computing device 102. When the connector 108 is coupled into the connector port 104, the authentication device 106 is physically and electrically connected to the mobile computing device 102.
The accessory authentication system 100 further includes an accessory device 112. The accessory device 112 provides certain functionality to the mobile computing device 102 when the accessory device 112 is interconnected with the mobile computing device 102 via the authentication device 106. To facilitate such interconnection, the accessory device 112 includes a connector 114 and a cable 116. The cable 116 connects the connector 114 to the accessory device 112. The connector 114 can be coupled to the connector port 110 of the authentication device 106. When such connection has been made, the accessory device 112 is in electrical communication with the mobile computing device 102 via the authentication device 106.
Although the accessory authentication system 100 includes the connector 114 and the end of the cable 116, the connector 114 can be integrated into the accessory device 112. In other words, in another embodiment, the cable 116 is not needed.
According to one aspect of the invention, the authentication device 106 serves to authenticate itself to the mobile computing device 102. An authenticated device is deemed authorized to interact with the mobile computing device 102. Also, once authorized, the nature and degree of interaction between the authenticated device 106 (or the accessory device 102) and the mobile computing device 102 can be controlled. Consequently, once authorized, the mobile computing device 102 can consider the authentication device 106 to be a trusted partner which is permitted to access functions, features or operations of the mobile computing device 102. On the other hand, if the mobile computing device 102 determines that the authentication device 106 is not associated with a trusted partner, then the mobile computing device 102 can prevent or limit interactions with either the authentication device 106 for the accessory device 112. The authentication device 106 itself can also be considered an accessory device for the mobile computing device 102.
In one embodiment, the authentication device 106 serves as a bus interface adapter, such as a USB or FireWire® adapter. In such an embodiment, the authentication device 106 servers to adapt the mobile computing device 102 to a bus host device (e.g., USB or FireWire® host). The accessory device 112 then advantageously need only operate as a bus peripheral device (e.g., USB or FireWire® device).
The accessory authentication system 150 also includes an accessory device 156. The accessory device 156 includes a connector 158 and an authentication device 160. In this embodiment, the authentication device 160 in internal to the accessory device 156. The accessory device 156 can be coupled to the mobile computing device 152 by inserting the connector 158 into the connector port 154. One such connection is established, the accessory device 156 is electrically connected to the mobile computing device 152. Nevertheless, the mobile computing device 152 can interact with the authentication device 160 to enable the mobile computing device 152 to authenticate the accessory device 156. When authenticated, the accessory device 156 is deemed authorized to interact with the mobile computing device 152. Once authorized, the nature and degree of interaction between the accessory device 156 and the mobile computing device 152 can be controlled. Consequently, once authorized, the mobile computing device 152 can consider the accessory 156 to be a trusted partner (or associated with a trusted partner) which is permitted to access functions, features or operations of the mobile computing device 152. On the other hand, if the mobile computing device 152 determines that the accessory device 156 is not a trusted partner (or not associated with a trusted partner), then the mobile computing device 152 can prevent or limit interactions with the accessory device 156.
The accessory device 176 can be coupled to the mobile computing device 172 by inserting the connector 178 into the connector port 174. One such connection is established, the accessory device 176 is electrically connected to the mobile computing device 172. Nevertheless, the mobile computing device 172 can interact with the authentication device 180 to enable the mobile computing device 172 to authenticate the accessory device 176. When authenticated, the accessory device 176 is deemed authorized to interact with the mobile computing device 172. Once authorized, the nature and degree of interaction between the accessory device 176 and the mobile computing device 172 can be controlled. Consequently, once authorized, the mobile computing device 172 can consider the accessory 176 to be a trusted partner (or associated with a trusted partner) which is permitted to access functions, features or operations of the mobile computing device 172. On the other hand, if the mobile computing device 172 determines that the accessory device 176 is not a trusted partner (or not associated with a trusted partner), then the mobile computing device 172 can prevent or limit interactions with either the accessory device 172.
Additionally, although
The processor 202 typically interacts with a mobile computing device (via the communication bus 214) to authenticate an accessory device (or an authentication device). During an authentication process, the processor 202 makes use of the authentication algorithm 210 as well as the private key 208 stored within the authentication controller 200. The authentication algorithm 210 can vary with different implementations, and suitable authentication algorithms are known to those skilled in the art.
Although not shown in
In one embodiment, the authentication controller 200 is implemented on a single integrated circuit (i.e., single chip). By providing the authentication controller 200 on a single integrated circuit, external access to the private key 208 and the authentication algorithm 210 is substantially prevented. As a result, the authentication process is not only cryptographically secured but also physically secured by limited physical access.
The authentication manager 250 includes an authentication module 252, an authorization table 254, and a port interface 256. The authentication module 252 operates to evaluate whether a particular accessory device (or authentication device) that couples to the port interface 256 is authentic and thus permitted to interoperate with the electronic device. The port interface 256 can provide power and a communication bus 258 to the accessory device (or authentication device). The authorization table 254 stores authentication information that is utilized by the authentication module 252 to evaluate whether certain accessory devices (or authentication devices) are authentic. As previously noted, the authentication manager 250 is provided within the electronic device, which can be referred to as a host device.
The electronic device (or host device) typically has various operating features that can be invoked or utilized. In one embodiment, an accessory device that is authenticated by the authentication manager 250 can have complete access to all of the features available on the electronic device (or host device). In another embodiment, the authorization table 254 can control the manner in which the features of the electronic device or host device that are made available to the accessory device. As an example, if the electronic device (or host device) offers a plurality of different features that can be utilized, the authorization table 254 can contain an indication as to which of these available features are permitted to be utilized by a particular accessory device. For example, authorization can be classified into levels or classes, each of which having different authorizations. The authorization can also specify the manner by which the different features are authorized for use. Hence, features may be authorized for use in limited ways. For example, a feature may be authorized for use over a slow communication interface (e.g., serial) with the electronic device and not over a fast communication interface (FireWire® or USB) with the electronic device. In other words, in this example, features may be authorized for use over only certain interface mechanisms.
In this embodiment, the authentication device 300 can operate to convert an electronic device into a host device, such as a USB host. Typically, the electronic device is a USB device, not a host device, but the attachment of the authentication device 300 to the electronic device can convert the electronic device into a host device. The host device can be USB compliant so that any USB device can be connected to the USB connector 310. In which case, any accessory with a USB port can connect with the electronic device via the authentication device 300.
The authentication techniques utilized by the invention can be utilized to allow a host device to authenticate an accessory device, or can allow an accessory device to authenticate a host device. The authentication process between the host device and the accessory device can be initiated at any time during coupling between the authentication device and the host device. For example, the authentication process can be initiated on connection of accessory device to host device, on first usage of restricted features, or periodically.
The host authentication process 400 initially receives 402 a device identifier associated with an accessory device to be authenticated. Additionally, an authentication value is received 404 from the accessory device. Here, the host device it is performing the authentication process; hence, the accessory device provides the authentication value to the host device. In one embodiment, in determining the authentication value, the accessory device utilizes a random number and a private key. The random number can be provided to the accessory device by the host device, or the random number can be available from the accessory device.
Next, the host authentication process 400 determines 406 whether the accessory device is authentic based on the authentication value and the device identifier. A decision 408 then determines whether the accessory device is authentic based on the determination made at block 406. When the decision 408 determines that the accessory device has been determined to be authentic, usage of the accessory device with the host device is authorized 410. The nature of the usage being authorized 410 can vary depending upon implementation. For example, the usage authorized 410 could allow complete usage of the accessory device or could allow limited usage of the accessory device.
On the other hand, when the decision 408 determines that the accessory device is not authentic, then the block 410 is bypassed such that the accessory device is not authorized for usage with the host device. In this case, since the accessory device was not determined to be authentic, usage of the accessory device with the host device is substantially restricted or prevented. Following the block 410, or its being bypassed, the host authentication process 400 is complete and ends.
The accessory authentication process 450 sends 452 a private key identifier associated with the accessory device to a host device. The private key identifier is used by the host device to obtain an appropriate private key which is used by the host device in producing the authentication value which is sent to the accessory device. The accessory device will receive 454 an authentication value from the host device.
Next, the accessory authentication process 450 determines 456 whether the host device is authentic based on the authentication value and a public key. Typically, the public key would be provided internal to the accessory device. A decision 458 then determines whether the host device has been determined to be authentic. When the decision 458 determines that the host device has been deemed authentic, then usage of the host device with the accessory device is authorized 460. The nature of the usage being authorized 460 can vary depending upon implementation. For example, the usage authorized 460 could allow complete usage of the host device or could allow limited usage of the host device.
On the other hand, when the decision 458 determines that the host device is not authentic, then the block 460 is bypassed, such that usage of the host device with the accessory device is substantially restricted or prevented. Following the block 460, or its being bypassed, the accessory authentication process 450 is complete and ends.
The host device processing 500 begins with a decision 502 that determines whether authentication information has been received from an accessory device. When the decision 502 determines that authentication information has not been received, the host device processing 500 awaits receipt of authentication information. Once the decision 502 determines that authentication information has been received at the host device, the host device processing 500 continues. Namely, a random number is generated 504 at the host device. Typically, the random number is generated 504 at the host device in a random matter, such as using a random number generator. Next, an authentication request is sent 506 to the accessory device. Here, the authentication request includes at least a random number.
A decision 508 then determines whether an authentication response has been received from the accessory device. When the decision 508 determines that the authentication response has not yet been received, then the host device processing 500 awaits receipt of such an authentication response. Once the decision 508 determines that an authentication response has been received, an encoded number and a device identifier are extracted 510 from the authentication response.
Then, using the device identifier, a public key can be obtained 512. In one embodiment, the host device includes a plurality of public keys that are assigned to various different accessory devices. The device identifier, in such an embodiment, can be utilized to designate a particular accessory device and thus permit selection of an appropriate one of the public keys. Next, the encoded number is cryptographically decoded 514 using the public key to produce a decoded number. The decoded number is then compared 516 to the random number. In other words, the decoded number that is derived from the encoded number that was received in the authentication response from the accessory device is compared 516 with the random number that was previously sent to the accessory device in the authentication request. A decision 518 then determines whether the decoded number matches the random number. When the decision 518 determines that the decoded number does not match the random number, a user can optionally be notified 520 that the accessory device its unauthorized. Such a notification can be achieved by visual means or audio means. For example, a visual notification could be presented on a display device associated with the host device or the accessory device.
On the other hand, when the decision 518 determines that the decoded number does match the random number, authorized features associated with the device identifier are obtained 522. Then, utilization of the authorized features is enabled 524. Next, a decision 526 can determine whether the accessory device has been removed (or detached) from the host device. When the decision 526 that the accessory device has not been removed, then the host device processing 500 can continue to permit the utilization of the authorized features. However, once the decision 526 determines that the accessory device has been removed, the utilization of all features of the host device can be disabled 528. In other words, as an example, the authorized features can considered enabled for utilization during a session. The session can remain active so long as the accessory device remains attached to the host device. Once detached, the session ends and subsequent re-attachment requires re-authentication. Following the operation 528, as well as following the operation 520, the host device processing 500 is complete and ends.
The accessory device processing 600 begins with a decision 602 that determines whether power is supplied to the accessory device. When the decision 602 determines that power is not supplied to the accessory device, the accessory device processing 600 awaits available power. Typically, power is supplied to the accessory device once the accessory device is connected to a host device. Hence, the decision 602 can alternatively determine whether the accessory device is connected to a host device.
Once the decision 602 determines that power is supplied to the accessory device, authentication information can be sent 604 to the host device. In one embodiment, the authentication information can include information indicating the one or more authentication versions that are supported. A decision 606 then determines whether an authentication request has been received. When the decision 606 determines that an authentication request is not been received, then the accessory device processing 600 awaits such a request. Once the decision 606 determines that an authentication request has been received, the random number provided in the authentication request is extracted 608. A private key is obtained 610 from the authentication device. For security reasons, the private key can be stored internal to the authentication device and not readily accessible outside of the authentication device. Next, the random number is cryptographically encoded 612 using key private key to produce an encoded number.
Thereafter, an authentication response is sent 614 to the host device. Here, the authentication response includes at least the encoded number and the device identifier. After the authentication response has been sent 614, a decision 616 determines whether access to features of the host device have been authorized. The decision 616 can be resolved actively or passively. For example, the host device might notify the accessory device that it has been authorized for access to one or more features of the host device. As another example, the host device may not notify the accessory device but might instead permit the accessory device to access the one or more features of the host device that are authorized. In any case, when the decision 616 determines that access to certain features on the host device have not been authorized, operation 620 of the accessory device, if any, is prevented from using the certain features of the host device. Indeed, in one embodiment, the host device can prevent any operation of the accessory device. As an example, the host device could prevent communication with the accessory device and/or cease supplying power to the accessory device.
On the other hand, when the decision 616 determines that access to certain features of the host device has been authorized, then the accessory device can be operated 618 in accordance with the authorized features. In other words, if authorized, the accessory device is able to interact with the host device to utilize the certain features supported by the host device.
Following the operations 618 and 620, a decision 622 determines whether the accessory device has been removed, i.e., whether the accessory device has been disconnected from the host device. When the decision 622 determines that the accessory device remains connected or attached to the host device, then the appropriate operations 618 or 620 can continue. Alternatively when the decision 622 determines that the accessory device has been removed, then the accessory device is no longer authorized to interact with the host device and thus can no longer utilized the previously authorized features supported by the host device. In this case, the accessory device processing 600 ends. However, the accessory device can be subsequently re-authorized by again performing the accessory device processing 600.
In the accessory device processing 600, the device identifier was provided with the authentication response. In an alternative embodiment, the device identifier can be provided to the host device differently, such as with the authentication information. The device identifier could also be separately provided to the host device.
According to one aspect of the invention, a host device can operate to authenticate an accessory device being coupled to the host device. Those accessory devices that are able to be authenticated are permitted to interoperate with the host device to a greater extent. The host device can thus control the nature and degree by which accessory devices can interoperate with the host device. For example, the host device can limit, restrict or prevent accessory devices from interoperating with the host device when accessory devices are not able to be authenticated. Alternatively, the host device can enable greater interoperating with the host device when accessory devices are authenticated.
Once the decision 702 determines that the accessory device is connected to the host device, the accessory device process 700 continues. When the accessory device process 700 continues, authentication control information is sent 704 from the accessory device to the host device. As an example, the authentication control information can specify the type of accessory device, whether authentication is supported, when to authenticate, and/or power requirement of the accessory device. Specific examples of types of accessory devices are: microphone, simple remote, display remote, remote user interface, RF transmitter, and USB control host. The authentication status of the accessory device is cleared 706 on its on initiative or in response to a command or acknowledgement from the host device. Here, by clearing 706 the authentication status whenever an accessory device is connected, the accessory device can understand that it must be authenticated with the host device.
Next, a decision 710 determines whether a device authentication information request has been received. Here, the device authentication information request is sent to the accessory device by the host device. The device authentication information request serves to request certain information from the accessory device that will be utilized by the host device during the authentication process. When the decision 710 determines that a device authentication information request has not yet been received, the accessory device process 700 awaits such request. Once the decision 710 determines that a device authentication information request has been received, device authentication information is obtained 712 from the accessory device. As an example, the device authentication information can include a device identifier and a version indicator. The device identifier can pertain to a vendor identifier, a product identifier, or both. The version indicator can pertain to a protocol version that is supported. The device authentication information is then sent 714 the host device.
A decision 716 then determines whether an authentication request has been received from the host device. Here, the authentication request is a request from the host device to provide an authentication response containing a digital signature that is utilized to authenticate the accessory device. When the decision 716 determines that an authentication request has not been received, the accessory device process 700 awaits such request. Once the decision 716 determines that an authentication request has been received, a host random number is extracted 718 from the authentication request. The authentication request includes at least the host random number which is to be used in the authentication process.
A private key internal to the accessory device is then obtained 720. A device digital signature can then be calculated 722 using at least the host random number, the private key and a device random number. The device random number is generated or available within the accessory device. The device digital signature is an encrypted value that will be used by the host device to authenticate the accessory device. An authentication response is then sent 724 to the host device. The authentication response is formed such that it includes at least the device digital signature.
A decision 726 then determines whether device authentication status has been received from the host device. When the decision 726 determines that device authentication status has not been received, the accessory device process 700 awaits such information. Once the decision 726 determines that the device authentication status has been received, the device authentication status can be stored 728 on the accessory device. Following the block 728, the accessory device process 700 ends.
When the host device process 800 continues, the device authentication status can be reset (i.e., cleared) 804. Thus, the accessory device is deemed unauthentic until the authentication process is able to authenticate the accessory device. This operation may have already occurred automatically at the host device, such as when an accessory device is disconnected from the host device.
A decision 806 then determines whether the accessory device supports authentication based on the authentication control information. When the decision 806 determines that authentication is not supported by the accessory device, the host device processing 800 ends without having authenticated the accessory device. In this case, the accessory device may be restricted, even prevented, from interoperating with the host device.
On the other hand, when the decision 806 determines that authentication is supported by the accessory device, the host device process 800 continues. At this point, a device authentication information request is sent 808 to the accessory device. A decision 810 then determines whether device authentication information has been received. When the decision 810 determines that device authentication information has not been received, the host device process 800 awaits such information is received. Once the decision 810 determines that device authentication information has been received, a decision 812 determines whether authentication should be performed at this time. Here, it should be understood that the host device process 800 can perform authentication proximate to when the accessory device is connected to the host device, or the authentication can be deferred until a later point in time, such as periodically when the accessory device desires (e.g., first desires) to use extended features of the host device which are only available to an authenticated device. Hence, when the decision 812 determines that authentication is not immediately required, the host device process 800 can await the appropriate time to perform the authentication process. Once the decision 812 determines that authentication should be performed, a host random number is generated 814. Next, an authentication request is sent 816 to the accessory device. The authentication request includes at least the host random number that has been generated 814.
A decision 818 then determines whether an authentication response has been received from the accessory device. When the decision 818 determines that an authentication response has been received, a device digital signature is extracted 820 from the authentication response. A public key is also obtained 822 for use with the accessory device. In one embodiment, the host device includes a plurality of public keys that are associated with different device identifiers. Hence, the device authentication information from the accessory device can include a device identifier for the accessory device. The device identifier can be utilized in obtaining 822 the public key for use with the accessory device. As an example, an authentication table, such as the authentication table 650 shown in
Next, the device digital signature is validated 824 using the public key. In one embodiment, the validation 824 of the digital device signature also makes use of the host random number. A decision 826 then determines whether the digital device signature has been validated. When the decision 826 determines that the device digital signature has been validated, the accessory device is deemed 828 authentic. Command access permissions associated with the accessory device can then be updated 830 so that the host device permits the accessory device to use those commands that are permitted by authenticated devices. On the other hand, when the decision 826 determines that the digital device signature has not been validated, the accessory device is deemed 832 not authentic. Following the blocks 830 and 832, device authentication status is sent 834 to the accessory device. The device authentication status serves to inform the accessory device as to whether or not the host device has authenticated the accessory device.
It the device authentication status indicates that the accessory device is deemed authentic, then the accessory device can proceed to interact with the host device in accordance with an authorized degree of the usage. As another example, when the device authentication status indicates that the accessory device is deemed not authentic, then the accessory device can be restricted, even prevented, from interaction with the host device. In any case, the authorized degree of usage of the accessory device with the host device is greater when the accessory device is deemed authentic.
The accessory device process 900 begins with a decision 902 that determines whether the accessory device is connected to the host device. When the decision 902 determines that the accessory device is not connected to the host device, the accessory device process 900 awaits such a connection. In other words, the accessory device process 900 is effectively invoked when the accessory device is connected to the host device. In one embodiment, the accessory device process 900 is invoked once it is determined that an accessory device has just recently connected to the host device. However, in other embodiments, the authentication process can be performed later (e.g., deferred).
Once the decision 902 determines that the accessory device is connected to the host device, authentication control information is sent 904 to the host device. A decision 906 then determines whether the authentication control information has been acknowledged. When the decision 906 determines that the authentication control information has been acknowledged, authentication status of the accessory device can be cleared 908. Here, by clearing 908 the authentication status, whenever the host device is connected, it is authenticated by the accessory device.
Next, a host authentication information request is sent 910 to the host device. A decision 912 then determines whether host authentication information has been received from the host device. When the decision 912 determines that host authentication information has not been received from the host device, the accessory device process 900 awaits such information.
Once the decision 912 determines that the host authentication information has been received, a decision 914 determines whether authentication should be performed at this time. Here, it should be noted that the authentication process can be performed immediately, such as soon after the connection has been detected, or can be deferred until a later point in time, such as when commands or extended functionality of the host device are requested. In any case, when the decision 914 determines that authentication is not to be performed at this time, the accessory device process 900 can await the appropriate time to performed the authentication.
Once the decision 914 determines that authentication should be performed, a device random number is generated 916. Then, an authentication request is sent 918 to the host device. The authentication request typically includes at least the device random number and a private key number. The private key number is used to select a private key at the host device.
Next, a decision 920 determines whether an authentication response has been received from the host device. When the decision 920 determines that an authentication response has not been received, then the accessory device process 900 awaits such a response. Once the decision 920 determines that an authentication response has been received, a host digital signature is extracted 922 from the authentication response. Also, a public key is obtained 924 based on a public key index. In one embodiment, the public key index is provided to the accessory device with the host authentication information. In one embodiment, the public key is determined at the accessory device using the public key index. For example, the accessory device can include a plurality of different public keys, and the appropriate one of the public keys to be utilized can be identified by the public key index.
The host digital signature is then validated 926 using the public key. The validation 926 may also make use of the device random number. Thereafter, a decision 928 determines whether the host digital signature has been validated. When the decision 928 determines that the host digital signature has been validated, the host device is deemed 930 to be authentic. Consequently, command access permissions for use by the host device are updated 932. For example, since the host device is validated, the interaction between the host device and the accessory device is deemed authorized, at least to the extent of the command access permissions. Alternatively, when the decision 928 determines that the host device is not validated, the host device is deemed 934 to be not authentic. Following the blocks 932 and 934, host authentication status can be sent 936 to the host device. Here, the host authentication status informs the host device of the results of the authentication process. Following the blocks 936, the accessory device process 900 is complete and ends.
The host device processing 1000 begins with a decision 1002 that determines whether authentication control information from the accessory device has been received. When the decision 1002 determines that authentication control information has not been received, the host device processing 1000 awaits such information. Once the decision 1002 determines that authentication control information has been received, the host device processing 1000 continues. In other words, the host device processing 1000 is effectively invoked once authentication control information from the accessory device is received.
When the host device processing 1000 continues, the host authentication status is reset 1004, thereby clearing any prior authentication status it may have. Then, a decision 1006 determines whether a host authentication information request has been received. When the decision 1006 determines that a host authentication information request has not been received, the host device processing 1000 awaits such request. Once the decision 1006 determines that a host authentication information request has been received, host authentication information is obtained 1008 at the host device. The host authentication information is then send 1010 to the accessory device. In one embodiment, the host authentication information includes at least version information and a public key index.
Next, a decision 1012 determines whether an authentication request has been received. When the decision 1012 determines that an authentication request has not been received, the host device processing 1000 awaits such request. Once the decision 1012 determines that an authentication request has been received, the device random number and a private key number are extracted 1014 from the authentication request. In this embodiment, it is understood that the authentication request being received from the accessory device includes at least the device random number and the private key number that can be utilized by the host device. Then, a private key is obtained 1016 based on the private key number. Here, the private key being obtained 1016 is internal to the host device and identified through use of the private key number.
A host digital signature is then calculated 1018 using the device random number, the private key and a host random number. The host random number can be generated or available at the host device. The host device process 1000 then sends 1020 an authentication response to the accessory device. The authentication response includes at least the host digital signature.
Thereafter, a decision 1022 determines whether a host authentication status has been received. When the decision 1022 determines that the host authentication status has not been received, the host device processing 1000 awaits such information. Once the decision 1022 determines that the host authentication status has been received, the authentication status is stored 1024 at the host device. At this point, the host device understands the authentication status it has with the accessory device and can operate accordingly. Following the block 1024, the host device processing 1000 is complete and ends.
According to another aspect of the invention, an electronic device, or host device, can also connect to a host computer, such as a personal computer. The personal computer can store, utilize and manage media items. The management of the media items can be not only for the host computer but also for the electronic device.
The media information pertains to characteristics or attributes of the media items. For example, in the case of audio or audiovisual media, the media information can include one or more of: title, album, track, artist, composer and genre. These types of media information are specific to particular media items. In addition, the media information can pertain to quality characteristics of the media items. Examples of quality characteristics of media items can include one or more of: bit rate, sample rate, equalizer setting, volume adjustment, start/stop and total time.
Still further, the host computer 1102 includes a play module 1112. The play module 1112 is a software module that can be utilized to play certain media items stored in the media store 1108. The play module 1112 can also display (on a display screen) or otherwise utilize media information from the media database 1110. Typically, the media information of interest corresponds to the media items to be played by the play module 1112.
The host computer 1102 also includes a communication module 1114 that couples to a corresponding communication module 1116 within the media player 1104. A connection or link 1118 removably couples the communication modules 1114 and 1116. In one embodiment, the connection or link 1118 is a cable that provides a data bus, such as a FIREWIRE® bus or USB bus, which is well known in the art. In another embodiment, the connection or link 1118 is a wireless channel or connection through a wireless network. Hence, depending on implementation, the communication modules 1114 and 1116 may communicate in a wired or wireless manner.
The media player 1104 also includes a media store 1120 that stores media items within the media player 1104. Optionally, the media store 1120 can also store data, i.e., non-media item storage. The media items being stored to the media store 1120 are typically received over the connection or link 1118 from the host computer 1102. More particularly, the management module 1106 sends all or certain of those media items residing on the media store 1108 over the connection or link 1118 to the media store 1120 within the media player 1104. Additionally, the corresponding media information for the media items that is also delivered to the media player 1104 from the host computer 1102 can be stored in a media database 1122. In this regard, certain media information from the media database 1110 within the host computer 1102 can be sent to the media database 1122 within the media player 1104 over the connection or link 1118. Still further, playlists identifying certain of the media items can also be sent by the management module 1106 over the connection or link 1118 to the media store 1120 or the media database 1122 within the media player 1104.
Furthermore, the media player 1104 includes a play module 1124 that couples to the media store 1120 and the media database 1122. The play module 1124 is a software module that can be utilized to play certain media items stored in the media store 1120. The play module 1124 can also display (on a display screen) or otherwise utilize media information from the media database 1122. Typically, the media information of interest corresponds to the media items to be played by the play module 1124.
According to one embodiment, to support an authentication process on the media player 1104, the media player 1104 can further include an authentication module 1126 and an authentication table 1128. In one implementation, the authentication module 1126 and the authentication table 1128 can respectively correspond to the authentication module 252 and the authentication table 254 described above with reference to
As previously noted, an accessory device can couple to a media player. Hence,
In one embodiment, the media player 1104 has limited or no capability to manage media items on the media player 1104. However, the management module 1106 within the host computer 1102 can indirectly manage the media items residing on the media player 1104. For example, to “add” a media item to the media player 1104, the management module 1106 serves to identify the media item to be added to the media player 1104 from the media store 1108 and then causes the identified media item to be delivered to the media player 1104. As another example, to “delete” a media item from the media player 1104, the management module 1106 serves to identify the media item to be deleted from the media store 1108 and then causes the identified media item to be deleted from the media player 1104. As still another example, if changes (i.e., alterations) to characteristics of a media item were made at the host computer 1102 using the management module 1106, then such characteristics can also be carried over to the corresponding media item on the media player 1104. In one implementation, the additions, deletions and/or changes occur in a batch-like process during synchronization of the media items on the media player 1104 with the media items on the host computer 1102.
In another embodiment, the media player 1104 has limited or no capability to manage playlists on the media player 1104. However, the management module 1106 within the host computer 1102 through management of the playlists residing on the host computer can indirectly manage the playlists residing on the media player 1104. In this regard, additions, deletions or changes to playlists can be performed on the host computer 1102 and then by carried over to the media player 1104 when delivered thereto.
As previously noted, synchronization is a form of media management. The ability to automatically initiate synchronization was also previously discussed above and in the related application noted above. Still further, however, the synchronization between devices can be restricted so as to prevent automatic synchronization when the host computer and media player do not recognize one another.
According to one embodiment, when a media player is first connected to a host computer (or even more generally when matching identifiers are not present), the user of the media player is queried as to whether the user desires to affiliate, assign or lock the media player to the host computer. When the user of the media player elects to affiliate, assign or lock the media player with the host computer, then a pseudo-random identifier is obtained and stored in either the media database or a file within both the host computer and the media player. In one implementation, the identifier is an identifier associated with (e.g., known or generated by) the host computer or its management module and such identifier is sent to and stored in the media player. In another implementation, the identifier is associated with (e.g., known or generated by) the media player and is sent to and stored in a file or media database of the host computer.
The media player 1200 also includes a user input device 1208 that allows a user of the media player 1200 to interact with the media player 1200. For example, the user input device 1208 can take a variety of forms, such as a button, keypad, dial, etc. Still further, the media player 1200 includes a display 1210 (screen display) that can be controlled by the processor 1202 to display information to the user. The user input device 1208 and the display 1210 can also be combined in the case of a touch screen. A data bus 1211 can facilitate data transfer between at least the file system 1204, the cache 1206, the processor 1202, and the CODEC 1212.
In one embodiment, the media player 1200 serves to store a plurality of media items (e.g., songs) in the file system 1204. When a user desires to have the media player play a particular media item, a list of available media items is displayed on the display 1210. Then, using the user input device 1208, a user can select one of the available media items. The processor 1202, upon receiving a selection of a particular media item, supplies the media data (e.g., audio file) for the particular media item to a coder/decoder (CODEC) 1212. The CODEC 1212 then produces analog output signals for a speaker 1214. The speaker 1214 can be a speaker internal to the media player 1200 or external to the media player 1200. For example, headphones or earphones that connect to the media player 1200 would be considered an external speaker.
The media player 1200 also includes a network/bus interface 1216 that couples to a data link 1218. The data link 1218 allows the media player 1200 to couple to a host computer or to accessory devices. The data link 1218 can be provided over a wired connection or a wireless connection. In the case of a wireless connection, the network/bus interface 1216 can include a wireless transceiver.
In one implementation, the host computer can utilize an application resident on the host computer to permit utilization and provide management for playlists, including a media device playlist. One such application is iTunes®, version 4.2, produced by Apple Computer, Inc. of Cupertino, Calif.
The media items (media assets) can pertain to one or more different types of media content. In one embodiment, the media items are audio tracks. In another embodiment, the media items are images (e.g., photos). However, in other embodiments, the media items can be any combination of audio, graphical or video content.
The above discussion makes reference to random number used with cryptographic approaches to authenticate an accessory device or a host device. The cryptographic approaches discussed above can make use of random numbers, public-private key pairs and authentication algorithms. The random numbers can also be referred to as random digests. The public-private key pairs and authentication algorithms can utilize public-key cryptographic systems, such as the well known RSA algorithm or an Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC) algorithm. It may be advantageous to use an ECC algorithm that offers reduced memory consumption with relatively smaller keys (e.g., 160 bits) as compared to larger keys (e.g., 1024 bits) as is typical for RSA implementations. An example of a reduced memory ECC algorithm is described in the related U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/051,441, filed Feb. 3, 2005, entitled “SMALL MEMORY FOOTPRINT FAST ELLIPTIC ENCRYPTION,” which has been incorporated herein by reference.
The various aspects, embodiments, implementations or features of the invention can be used separately or in any combination.
The invention can be implemented by software, hardware, or a combination of hardware and software. The invention can also be embodied as computer readable code on a computer readable medium. The computer readable medium is any data storage device that can store data which can thereafter be read by a computer system. Examples of the computer readable medium include read-only memory, random-access memory, CD-ROMs, DVDs, magnetic tape, optical data storage devices, and carrier waves. The computer readable medium can also be distributed over network-coupled computer systems so that the computer readable code is stored and executed in a distributed fashion.
The advantages of the invention are numerous. Different aspects, embodiments or implementations may yield one or more of the following advantages. One advantage of the invention is that control over accessory interaction with a host device can be controlled. As a result, an electronic device can limit usage of some or all of its features to only those accessory devices that are deemed authorized. Another advantage of the invention is that it provides the ability to manage quality of those accessory device that are permitted to be utilized with host devices. By managing quality of accessory devices, the operation of an electronic device is less likely tarnished by the attachment of an inferior accessory device. Still another advantage of the invention is that an authentication process can control access to certain features of electronic devices on a manufacturer or device basis.
The many features and advantages of the present invention are apparent from the written description and, thus, it is intended by the appended claims to cover all such features and advantages of the invention. Further, since numerous modifications and changes will readily occur to those skilled in the art, the invention should not be limited to the exact construction and operation as illustrated and described. Hence, all suitable modifications and equivalents may be resorted to as falling within the scope of the invention.
This application, is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/312,672, filed Jun. 23, 2014, which is a continuation of Ser. No. 12/328,368, filed Dec. 4, 2008, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,763,079, which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/051,499, filed Feb. 3, 2005, entitled “ACCESSORY AUTHENTICATION FOR ELECTRONIC DEVICES,” now U.S. Pat. No. 7,823,214, which claims the benefit of U.S. provisional patent application No. 60/642,340, filed Jan. 7, 2005, entitled “ACCESSORY AUTHENTICATION FOR ELECTRONIC DEVICES,” which are incorporated by reference. This application is also related to: (i) U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/051,441, filed Feb. 3, 2005, entitled “SMALL MEMORY FOOTPRINT FAST ELLIPTIC ENCRYPTION,” which is hereby incorporated herein by reference; (ii) U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/642,276, filed Jan. 7, 2005, entitled “PORTABLE MEDIA DEVICE AND IMPROVED PLAYLIST PROCESSING ON MEDIA DEVICES,” which is hereby incorporated herein by reference; (iii) U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/642,334, filed Jan. 7, 2005, entitled “MEDIA MANAGEMENT FOR GROUPS OF MEDIA ITEMS,” which is hereby incorporated herein by reference; (iv) U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/031,547, filed Jan. 7, 2005, entitled “PORTABLE POWER SOURCE TO PROVIDE POWER TO AN ELECTRONIC DEVICE VIA AN INTERFACE,” which is hereby incorporated herein by reference; (v) U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/031,288, filed Jan. 7, 2005, entitled “METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR DISCOVERING A POWER SOURCE ON A PERIPHERAL BUS,” which is hereby incorporated herein by reference; (vi) U.S. patent application Ser. No. 29/220,463, filed Jan. 7, 2005, entitled “CONNECTOR SYSTEM,” which is hereby incorporated herein by reference; (vii) U.S. patent application Ser. No. 29/220,892, filed Jan. 7, 2005, entitled “CONNECTOR INTERFACE SYSTEM FOR MULTI-COMMUNICATION DEVICE,” which is hereby incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4673861 | Dubovsky et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4847781 | Brown, III et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4850899 | Maynard | Jul 1989 | A |
4916334 | Minagawa | Apr 1990 | A |
4924216 | Leung | May 1990 | A |
4938483 | Yavetz | Jul 1990 | A |
5041025 | Haitmanek | Aug 1991 | A |
5051606 | Ikehara | Sep 1991 | A |
5055069 | Townsend et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5080603 | Mouissie | Jan 1992 | A |
5104243 | Harding | Apr 1992 | A |
5108313 | Adams | Apr 1992 | A |
5150031 | James et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5186646 | Pederson | Feb 1993 | A |
5247138 | Landmeier | Sep 1993 | A |
5277624 | Champion | Jan 1994 | A |
5471128 | Patino et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5525981 | Abernethy | Jun 1996 | A |
5546397 | Mahany | Aug 1996 | A |
5586893 | Mosquera | Dec 1996 | A |
5592588 | Reekes et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5618045 | Kagan et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5648712 | Hahn | Jul 1997 | A |
5660558 | Osanai et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5675467 | Nishimura et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5680102 | Xydis | Oct 1997 | A |
5694137 | Wood | Dec 1997 | A |
5712638 | Issa | Jan 1998 | A |
5727866 | Kraines et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5732361 | Liu | Mar 1998 | A |
5754027 | Oglesbee et al. | May 1998 | A |
5830001 | Kinoshita | Nov 1998 | A |
5835862 | Nykanen et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5845217 | Lindell et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5859522 | Theobald | Jan 1999 | A |
5884323 | Hawkins et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5901049 | Schmidt et al. | May 1999 | A |
5949877 | Traw et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5964847 | Booth, III et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5975957 | Noda et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5991640 | Lilja et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6007372 | Wood | Dec 1999 | A |
6012105 | Rubbmark et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6031797 | Van Ryzin et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6038457 | Barkart | Mar 2000 | A |
6053773 | Wu | Apr 2000 | A |
6078402 | Fischer et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6078789 | Bodenmann et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6125455 | Yeo | Sep 2000 | A |
6130518 | Gabehart et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6139373 | Ward et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6154773 | Roberts et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6154798 | Lin et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6161027 | Poirel | Dec 2000 | A |
6169387 | Kaib | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6175358 | Scott-Jackson et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6178514 | Wood | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6184652 | Yang | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6184655 | Malackowski | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6188265 | Liu et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6192340 | Abecassis | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6203345 | Roque et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6204637 | Rengan | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6206480 | Thompson | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6211581 | Farrant | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6211649 | Matsuda | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6224420 | Nishio et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6230205 | Garrity et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6230322 | Saib et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6233409 | Haines et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6234827 | Nishio et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6236395 | Sezan et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6247135 | Feague | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6252380 | Koenck | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6255961 | Van Ryzin et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6261109 | Liu et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6262723 | Matsuzawa et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6267623 | Hisamatsu | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6268845 | Pariza et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6271605 | Carkner et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6272328 | Nguyen et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6280251 | Nishio et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6283789 | Tsai | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6304764 | Pan | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6314326 | Fuchu | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6314479 | Frederick et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6316916 | Bohne | Nov 2001 | B2 |
6319061 | Chen et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6322396 | Kuan | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6336365 | Blackadar et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6344727 | Desai et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6353894 | Pione | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6354713 | Leifer et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6358089 | Kuroda et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6372974 | Gross et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6377825 | Kennedy et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6385596 | Wiser et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6394905 | Takeda et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6418421 | Hurtado et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6429622 | Svensson | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6429879 | Sturgeon et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6431915 | Ko | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6453371 | Hampson et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6454592 | Takagi | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6461173 | Mizuno et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6464542 | Lee | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6468110 | Fujino et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6476825 | Croy et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6478603 | Wu | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6483428 | Fish et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6485328 | Wu | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6489751 | Small et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6490667 | Ikeda | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6501441 | Ludtke et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6505160 | Levy et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6524119 | Kato et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6526287 | Lee | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6535981 | Shimizu | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6558201 | Begley et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6559773 | Berry | May 2003 | B1 |
6577877 | Charlier et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6589076 | Davis et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6591085 | Grady | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6606707 | Hirota | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6608264 | Fouladpour | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6608399 | McConnell et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6614232 | Mukai | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6616473 | Kamata et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6629197 | Bhogal et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6642629 | DeLeeuw | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6643777 | Chu | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6650549 | Chiao | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6651138 | Lai et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6653813 | Khatri | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6663420 | Xiao | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6665803 | Lunsford et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6670997 | Northrup | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6674995 | Meyers et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6687454 | Kuroiwa | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6697944 | Jones et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6708283 | Nelvin et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6724339 | Conway et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6725061 | Hutchison, IV et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6728546 | Peterson et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6728729 | Jawa et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6747859 | Walbeck et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6754468 | Sieben et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6761635 | Hoshino et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6774939 | Peng | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6776626 | Huang et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6776660 | Kubota et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6776665 | Huang | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6799226 | Robbin et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6801964 | Mahdavi | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6813528 | Yang | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6816376 | Bright et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6830160 | Risolia | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6836814 | Takaoka | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6859538 | Voltz | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6859854 | Kwong | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6870733 | Castell et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6879843 | Kim | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6914551 | Vidal | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6928295 | Olson et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6931266 | Miyoshi et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6931456 | Payne et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6939177 | Kato et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6944704 | Brelin | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6991483 | Milan et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7004787 | Milan | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7006793 | Himmel et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7013164 | Lin | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7040919 | Yao | May 2006 | B2 |
7046230 | Zadesky | May 2006 | B2 |
7050783 | Curtiss et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7054888 | LaChapelle et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7062261 | Goldstein et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7108560 | Chou et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7120462 | Kumar | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7127678 | Bhesania et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7127879 | Zhu et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7149543 | Kumar | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7155545 | Wang | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7167112 | Andersen et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7167935 | Hellberg | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7187947 | White et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7187948 | Alden | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7215042 | Yan | May 2007 | B2 |
7281214 | Fadell | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7283635 | Anderson | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7293122 | Schubert et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7293227 | Plastina et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7299304 | Saint-Hilaire et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7303282 | Dwyer et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7304685 | Park et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7305254 | Findikli | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7305506 | Lydon et al. | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7322043 | Letsinger | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7324833 | White et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7362963 | Lin | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7363129 | Barnicle et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7391963 | Chen et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7415563 | Holden et al. | Aug 2008 | B1 |
7441058 | Bolton et al. | Oct 2008 | B1 |
7441062 | Novotney et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7444388 | Svendsen | Oct 2008 | B1 |
7450961 | Heubel et al. | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7454019 | Williams | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7493645 | Tranchina | Feb 2009 | B1 |
7526588 | Schubert et al. | Apr 2009 | B1 |
7529870 | Schubert et al. | May 2009 | B1 |
7529871 | Schubert et al. | May 2009 | B1 |
7529872 | Schubert et al. | May 2009 | B1 |
7558894 | Lydon et al. | Jul 2009 | B1 |
7574177 | Tupman et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7587540 | Novotney et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7590783 | Lydon et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7610350 | Abdulrahiman et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7634605 | Laefer et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7647129 | Griffin | Jan 2010 | B1 |
7660929 | Novotney et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7670263 | Ellis et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7673020 | Rosenbloom et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7673083 | Laefer et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7680849 | Heller et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7681033 | Miura et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7702833 | Novotney et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7757026 | Novotney et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7779185 | Schubert et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7791319 | Veselic et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7797471 | Laefer et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7823214 | Rubinstein et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7826318 | Holden et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7836493 | Xia et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7853746 | Novotney et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7877532 | Schubert et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7895378 | Holden et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7908415 | Laefer et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7949810 | Bolton et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7975075 | Lee et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8006019 | Laefer et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8073426 | Ishikawa | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8082376 | Schubert et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8086332 | Dorogusker et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8095716 | Holden et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8099536 | Schubert et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8112567 | Lydon et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8117651 | Novotney et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8135891 | Lydon et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8161567 | Rubinstein et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8171194 | Schubert et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8171195 | Schubert et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8208853 | Lydon et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8238811 | Lydon | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8239595 | Schubert et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8285901 | Schubert et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8296565 | Taylor | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8370555 | Holden et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8386680 | Schubert et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8402187 | Lydon et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8509691 | Lydon et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8590036 | Novotney et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8634761 | Lydon | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8763079 | Rubinstein et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
9160541 | Novotney et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
20010003205 | Gilbert | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20010005641 | Matsumoto et al. | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20010006884 | Matsumoto | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010033244 | Harris et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010042107 | Palm | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020002035 | Sim et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020002706 | Sprunk | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020010759 | Hitson et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020015362 | Cowgill et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020025042 | Saito | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020029303 | Nguyen | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020065074 | Cohn et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020068610 | Anvekar et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020072390 | Uchiyama | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020090982 | Hollstrom et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020103008 | Rahn et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020105861 | Leapman | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020108108 | Akaiwa et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020112175 | Makofka et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020115426 | Olson | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020115480 | Huang | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020116533 | Holliman et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020120850 | Walker et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020132521 | Groebe et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020132651 | Jinnouchi | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020145536 | Clise | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020151327 | Levitt | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020152874 | Vilcauskas et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020156546 | Ramaswamy | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020156949 | Kubo et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020161865 | Nguyen | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020173273 | Spurgat et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020174269 | Spurgat et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020191764 | Hori et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020194621 | Tran et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030004934 | Qian | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030011608 | Wada | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030028664 | Tan et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030041206 | Dickie | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030059022 | Nebiker et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030067741 | Alfonso et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030073432 | Meade | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030079038 | Robbin et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030090988 | Sun et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030097379 | Ireton | May 2003 | A1 |
20030110403 | Crutchfield et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030128571 | Kawashima | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030151621 | McEvilly et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030162562 | Curtiss et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030167318 | Robbin et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030172209 | Liu et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030185395 | Lee et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030198015 | Vogt | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030212895 | Kisliakov | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030215102 | Marlowe | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030220988 | Hymel | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030236075 | Johnson et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030236991 | Letsinger | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030236998 | Gilstrap et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030237043 | Novak et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040003300 | Malueg et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040006713 | Minemura | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040019497 | Volk et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040025052 | Dickenson | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040039860 | Mills et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040048569 | Kawamura | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040055446 | Robbin et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040090998 | Chen | May 2004 | A1 |
20040103223 | Gabehart et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040116005 | Choi | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040125553 | Castell et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040151327 | Marlowe | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040152439 | Kimura et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040162029 | Grady | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040162105 | Reddy et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040164708 | Veselic et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040172533 | DeMello et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040186935 | Bel et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040194154 | Meadors et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040198436 | Alden | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040224638 | Fadell et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040235339 | Sato et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040242029 | Nakamura et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040249994 | Shapiro et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040252966 | Holloway et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040267812 | Harris et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040267825 | Novak et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040268397 | Dunbar et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050001589 | Edington | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050005133 | Xia et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050014119 | Rudakov | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050014531 | Findikli | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050014536 | Grady | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050015355 | Heller et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050017946 | Park | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050018768 | Mabey et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050022212 | Bowen | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050047071 | Tse Chun Hin | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050075136 | Cromer et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050080915 | Shoemaker et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050088275 | Valoteau et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050111675 | Lee | May 2005 | A1 |
20050135790 | Hutten | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050138433 | Linetsky | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050149213 | Guzak et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050149551 | Fong et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050159149 | Wen et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050181756 | Lin | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050198189 | Robinson et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050207726 | Chen | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050227612 | Helstrom et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050239333 | Watanabe et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050240705 | Novotney et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050240778 | Saito | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050246375 | Manders et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050251565 | Weel | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050281185 | Kawasaki | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060015826 | Shiozawa et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060031545 | Manders et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060035527 | Numano | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060056796 | Nishizawa et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060072527 | Beck | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060088228 | Marriott et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060109987 | Baek | May 2006 | A1 |
20060116009 | Langberg et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060126422 | Takagi et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060143680 | Adachi | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060150123 | Goodwin et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060161621 | Rosenberg | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060163358 | Biderman | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060168298 | Aoki et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060184456 | de Janasz | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060188237 | Watanabe et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060205349 | Passier et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060224620 | Silverman et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060236245 | Agarwal et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060247851 | Morris | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060258289 | Dua | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060277555 | Howard | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060294209 | Rosenbloom et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070011138 | Boucard | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070015457 | Krampf et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070018947 | Toro-Lira | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070056012 | Kwon et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070056013 | Duncan | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070070856 | Tebele | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070077784 | Kalayjian et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070080823 | Fu et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070083750 | Miura et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070083814 | Wilbrink et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070086724 | Grady et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070106760 | Houh et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070130592 | Haeusel | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070173197 | Hsiung | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070173294 | Hsiung | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070206827 | Tupman et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070209081 | Morris | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070226238 | Kiilerich et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070226384 | Robbin et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070226497 | Taylor | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070230910 | Welch et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070233294 | Holden et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070233295 | Laefer et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070234420 | Novotney et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070236482 | Proctor et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070244984 | Svendsen | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070247794 | Jaffe et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070271387 | Lydon et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070280489 | Roman et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070291404 | Morse et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070300155 | Laefer et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080010014 | Hess | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080025172 | Holden et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080034325 | Ording | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080055272 | Anzures et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065722 | Brodersen et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080155129 | Khedouri et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080159534 | Rager et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080188209 | Dorogusker et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080243282 | Koski et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090013110 | Novotney et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090013253 | Laefer et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090083834 | Rubinstein et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090125134 | Bolton et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090132076 | Holden et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090198361 | Schubert et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090204244 | Schubert et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090204738 | Schubert et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090210079 | Schubert et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090249101 | Lydon et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090292835 | Novotney et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090299506 | Lydon et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100009660 | Ishikawa | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100049350 | Laefer et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100106879 | Laefer et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100173673 | Lydon | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100312931 | Schubert et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100312932 | Schubert et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110066775 | Schubert et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110066776 | Schubert et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110078354 | Krueger et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20120102236 | Schubert et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120272297 | Lydon | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120278882 | Lydon et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130014247 | Novotney et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20140208416 | Lydon | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140223184 | Novotney et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20150082049 | Rubinstein et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1263292 | Aug 2000 | CN |
1320232 | Oct 2001 | CN |
1592194 | Mar 2005 | CN |
1759367 | Apr 2006 | CN |
1767504 | May 2006 | CN |
101030175 | Sep 2007 | CN |
101055608 | Oct 2007 | CN |
101099157 | Jan 2008 | CN |
2011031760 | Mar 2011 | CN |
1 022 643 | Jul 2000 | EP |
1104150 | May 2001 | EP |
1150472 | Oct 2001 | EP |
1367734 | Dec 2003 | EP |
1498899 | Jan 2005 | EP |
1594319 | Nov 2005 | EP |
1672613 | Jun 2006 | EP |
1406366 | Jun 2009 | EP |
2 293 212 | Mar 2011 | EP |
2 293 213 | Mar 2011 | EP |
2405718 | Mar 2005 | GB |
07-176351 | Jul 1995 | JP |
10-321302 | Apr 1998 | JP |
10-334993 | Dec 1998 | JP |
11-288420 | Oct 1999 | JP |
2000-214953 | Aug 2000 | JP |
2000-223215 | Aug 2000 | JP |
2000-223216 | Aug 2000 | JP |
2000-223218 | Aug 2000 | JP |
2001-014441 | Jan 2001 | JP |
2001-035603 | Feb 2001 | JP |
2001-069165 | Mar 2001 | JP |
2001-196133 | Jul 2001 | JP |
2001-230021 | Aug 2001 | JP |
2001-273181 | Oct 2001 | JP |
2001-322350 | Nov 2001 | JP |
2001-339393 | Dec 2001 | JP |
2002-025720 | Jan 2002 | JP |
2002-140304 | May 2002 | JP |
2002-203641 | Jul 2002 | JP |
2002-221974 | Aug 2002 | JP |
2002-245719 | Aug 2002 | JP |
2002-252566 | Sep 2002 | JP |
3090747 | Oct 2002 | JP |
2002-342659 | Nov 2002 | JP |
2002-374447 | Dec 2002 | JP |
2003-017165 | Jan 2003 | JP |
2003-032351 | Jan 2003 | JP |
2003-058430 | Feb 2003 | JP |
2003-099729 | Apr 2003 | JP |
2003-274386 | Sep 2003 | JP |
2004-040717 | Feb 2004 | JP |
2004-065363 | Mar 2004 | JP |
2004-078538 | Mar 2004 | JP |
2004-199138 | Jul 2004 | JP |
2004-259280 | Sep 2004 | JP |
2004-280581 | Oct 2004 | JP |
2004-334860 | Nov 2004 | JP |
2005-229597 | Aug 2005 | JP |
2005-236394 | Sep 2005 | JP |
2005-534089 | Nov 2005 | JP |
2005-539278 | Dec 2005 | JP |
2006-524887 | Nov 2006 | JP |
2007-538344 | Dec 2007 | JP |
2008-053955 | Mar 2008 | JP |
2008-071419 | Mar 2008 | JP |
2008-527444 | Jul 2008 | JP |
2008-541588 | Nov 2008 | JP |
2009-501964 | Jan 2009 | JP |
2009-303001 | Dec 2009 | JP |
5312595 | Jul 2013 | JP |
530267 | May 2003 | TW |
9926330 | May 1999 | WO |
9948089 | Sep 1999 | WO |
0039907 | Jul 2000 | WO |
0060450 | Oct 2000 | WO |
2011031760 | Mar 2001 | WO |
0143342 | Jun 2001 | WO |
0223349 | Mar 2002 | WO |
0249314 | Jun 2002 | WO |
03036541 | May 2003 | WO |
03036957 | May 2003 | WO |
03056776 | Jul 2003 | WO |
03073688 | Sep 2003 | WO |
2004004339 | Jan 2004 | WO |
2004084413 | Sep 2004 | WO |
2004095772 | Nov 2004 | WO |
2004098079 | Nov 2004 | WO |
2004112311 | Dec 2004 | WO |
2005109781 | Nov 2005 | WO |
2005119463 | Dec 2005 | WO |
2006071364 | Jul 2006 | WO |
2006073702 | Jul 2006 | WO |
2006080957 | Aug 2006 | WO |
2007139660 | Dec 2007 | WO |
2008002916 | Jan 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Chinese Office Action mailed on Dec. 8, 2015 for CN Patent Application No. 20120136876.X, with English translation, 15 pages. |
“A Serial Bus on Speed Diagram: Getting Connected with FireWire,” downloaded Oct. 16, 2001, PC Magazine: PC Tech (A Serial Bus on Speed) wysiwyg://51http://www.zdnet.com/pctech/content/18/10/tu1810.007.html p. 7. (2 pages). |
“Cables to Go,” download Oct. 16, 2001 http://www.cablestogo.com/product.asp?cat%5Fid=601&sku=27028 (1 page). |
“DMR Software v1.3 for Mac OS X—User Manual”, Copyright 2002, Keyspan, rev. D 04.09.01AI, 50 pages. |
“ExpressBus™ F5U0I0,” User Guide Packing Checklist, Belkin Components Product Warranty. (2 pages). |
“Fire Wire Connector,” downloaded Oct. 16, 2001, wysiwyg://76/http://developer.apple.com/...es/Macintosh—CPUs-G3/ibook/ibook-27.html (2 pages). |
“FireWire”, downloaded Oct. 16, 2001; si—wyg:/—/42/http://developer.apple.—com/hardware/Fire—Wire (2 pages). |
“How to Connect Your Computer PC Hardware”, downloaded Oct. 16, 2001, http:///www.scar.utoronto.ca!˜ccweb/faculty/connect-howto.html (5 pages). |
“IEEE 1394/USB Comparison,” downloaded Oct. 16, 2001, www.genitech.com.aulLIBRARY/TechSupportiinfobits/firewirevsusb.html (4 pages). |
“Introduction to Public Key Cryptography,” Oct. 9, 1998, printed from http://developer.netscape.com/docs/manuals/security/pkin/contents.html on Oct. 6, 2004. (21 pages). |
“iPodDock/iPod Cradle,” www.bookendzdocks.com/bookendz/dock—cradle.html downloaded Feb. 27, 2003. (2 pages). |
“MPV™ Music Profile Specification Revision 1.00” Internet Citation [online] (Jan. 7, 2004) URL:http//www.osta.org/mpv/public/specs/MPVMusic-Prof-Spec-1.00.pdf> [retrieved Jun. 20, 2006] the whole document. (70 pages). |
“Neuros MP3 Digital Audio Computer,” www.neurosaudio.com.downloaded Apr. 9, 2003. (6 pages). |
“PMC FW2 IEEE1394 FireWire Controller”, downloaded Oct. 16, 2001, http://www.bvmltd.co.uk/PMCfw2ds.html (10 pages). |
“The Authoritative Dictionary of IEEE Standards Terms, Seventh Edition,” Published by Standards Information Network, IEEE Press, 2000. (3 pages). |
“Universal Serial Bus Specification—Rev 2.0 ” Chapter 6: Compaq Hewlett-Packard Apr. 27, 2000, pp. 85, 99-100. (7 pages). |
“Universal Serial Bus Specification—Rev 2.0,” XP002474828 Chapter 9: USB Device Framework, pp. 239-274. (36 pages). |
Altec Lansing, “inMOTION Users Guide,” Corp. Headquarters, 535 Rte.6 & 209, Milford, PA 18337. (8 pages). |
Anonymous, “Future of Digital Music in Windows,” Microsoft Windows Hardware Developer Central Archive, Dec. 4, 2001 [Online], [retrieved on Jan. 15, 2008]. <URL:http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/archive/digitaudio.mspx> (3 pages). |
Anonymous, “Introduction to Digital Audio,” Microsoft Windows Hardware Developer Central Archive, Dec. 4, 2001 [Online], [retrieved on Jan. 15, 2008]. <URL:http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/archive/digitaudio.mspx> (2 pages). |
Anonymous, “Windows and Red Book Audio,” Microsoft Windows Hardware Developer Central Archive, Dec. 4, 2001 [Online], [retrieved Jan. 15, 2008]. <URL:http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/archive/Dmfuture.mspx> (2 pages). |
Belkin iPod Voice Recorder, Product Specification Sheet, printed Jun. 16, 2004. (2 pages). |
Bindra, “Standard Turns Monitor into I/O Hub,” Electronic Engineering Times, vol. 918, Sep. 6, 1996, p. 14. (1 page). |
Brentrup, “Introduction to Public Key Cryptography Demystified,” Campus Technology, printed from http://www.campus-technology.com/article.asp?id=7626 on Oct. 6, 2004. (5 pages). |
Brown, “Making USB Work,” downloaded Oct. 16, 2001, PC Magazine: PC Tech wysiwyg:/155/http://www.zdnet.com/pcmag/pctech/content!18/04/tu1804.001.html (2 pages). |
Chen et al., “Design and Implemeation of a Hard Disk-Based Entertainment Device for Managing Media Contents on the Go,” Consumer Electonics, 1005. (ISCE 2005). Proceedings of the Ninth International Symposium on, pp. 328-333, Jun. 14-16, 2005. (6 pages). |
Crawford et al., “Sample rate conversion and bit rate reduction in the studio,” IEEE Colloquium on Digital Audio Signal Processing, May 22, 1991, pp. 8/1-8/3. (3 pages). |
Derman, “Monitors Make Net Connections,” Electronic Engineering Times, vol. 933, 1996, pp. 60 and 69. (2 pages). |
European Patent Office, Decision to Refuse a European Patent Application; Application No. 07 812 335., Mailed Jan. 19, 2011 , 18 pages. |
European Patent Office, Extended Search Report; Application No. 10194370.2, Mailed Feb. 6, 2012, 9 pages. |
European Patent Office, Office Action, Application No. 07 799 051.3, Mailed Sep. 24, 2012, 7 pages. |
European Patent Office, Office Action, Application No. 09 791 751.2, Mailed Oct. 19, 2012, 7 pages. |
Fried, “FireWire poised to become ubiquitous,” downloaded Oct. 16, 2001, CNET News.com, 1394 Trade Association: Press, wysiwyg:/132/http:/—113—94ta.org/Press/200—1—Press/august!8.2 7.—b.html (3 pages). |
Fried, “New Fire Wire to blaze faster trail,” downloaded Oct. 16, 2001, CNET News.com, http://news.cnet.com/news/0/I006-200-6021210.html (5 pages). |
International Search Report dated Dec. 6, 2007 in PCT Application No. PCT/US2007/010888. |
iPod Classic User's Guide, acquired from apple.com, 2002. (44 pages). |
iPod nano Features Guide, acquired from apple.com, 2008. (72 pages). |
iPod touch User's Guide, acquired from apple.com, 2008. (120 pages). |
Janssen, Jan, “A Single-Chip Universal Serial Bus D/A Converter for High-Quality Audio Signals, ” THPM 16.7 IEEE Jun. 11, 1997; Jun. 11, 1997-Jun. 13, 1997, Jun. 11, 1997, (2 pages ). |
Japanese Patent Office; Office Action for Application No. 2010-011810, Mailed Dec. 11, 2012. (5 pages). |
Japanese Patent Office; Office Action for Application No. 2010-011810, Mailed Jul. 9, 2012. (5 pages). |
Japanese Patent Office; Office Action for Application No. 2011-526100 , Mailed Dec. 13, 2012. (4 pages). |
Keyspan, “Express Remote Supports Apple's Airport Express,” Press Release, Nov. 10, 2004, Copyright 2005,Keyspan, 2 pages. |
Keyspan, “Keyspan Express Remote,” Product Fact Sheet, Oct. 2004, 1 page. |
Keyspan, Express Remote; Remote Control for your Mac or PC (URM-17A), product information AU datasheet, Copyright 2005, Keyspan, http://www.keyspan.com/products/usb/urm17a/, downloaded Sep. 25, 2005, 2 pages. |
Keyspan, Remote for iTunes; Controls ITunes, DVD, CD and more! (URM-15T), product AT information datasheet, Keyspan, http://www.keyspan.com/products/usb/urm15t, downloaded Sep. 25, 2005, 2 pages. |
Lambert, “Digital Audio Interfaces,” Journal of the Audio Engineering Society, Audio Engineering Society, New York, NY, vol. 38, No. 9, (Sep. 1, 1990), pp. 681-684, 686, 688, 690, 692 and 696, XP000175146 ISSN: 1549-4950 figures 9, 10. (10 pages). |
Lewis, “On Technology” Fortune Magazine, Dec. 9, 2002, p. 240. (1 page). |
LSI Logic's Broadcast PC Card Brings New Multimedia Capabilities to Personal Computing. (Nov. 16). PR Newswire, 1. Retrieved Jun. 26, 2010, from Business Dateline. (3 pages). |
MAXTech Technology Ltd., CES 2000/Las Vegas, Jan. 6-9, 2000, [on line], [retrieved on Sep. 26, 2008]. Retrieved from the Internet <URL: http://web.archive.org/web/20000930170634.maxtech.com.hk/t-details.htm>. (2 pages). |
MAXTech Technology Ltd., CES 2000/Las Vegas, Jan. 6-9, 2000, [online], [retrieved on Sep. 23, 2008]. Retrieved from the Internet <URL: http://web.archive.org/web/20010223230441/www.maxtech.com.hk/g-p06.htm>. (2 pages). |
Menezes et al., “Handbook of Applied Cryptography,” Identification and Entity Authentication, Jan. 1, 1997, pp. 385-424. (41 pages). |
Microsoft, “Media Transport Protocol Implementation Details,” 2005. (18 pages). |
Networking Tech Note, “1394 Standards and Specifications,” Ocober 16, 2001. (3 pages). |
Nomad II Player Version 1.0 (CLI) (User's Manual), Creative Technology, Ltd., Jan. 2000. (46 pages). |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/833,689 mailed Dec. 28, 2007; 15 pps. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/833,689 mailed Jun. 20, 2007; 11 pps. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/833689 mailed Oct. 4, 2006; 11 pps. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/474,552 mailed Oct. 26, 2012; 27 pp. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/209,970 mailed on Jun. 10, 2009; 7 pps. |
Office Action dated Feb. 18, 2010 in Australian Patent Application No. 2007268239. |
Office Action for European Patent Application No. 10194377.7, mailed Apr. 15, 2013, 6 pages. |
Office Action for Korean Patent Application No. 10-2012-7018797, mailed Apr. 25, 2013, 5 pages. |
Office Action in corresponding Japanese Application No. 2009-512018, mailed Apr. 5, 2011. |
Salling, “Sailing Clicker 2.2.1”, User Manual, Copyright 2003-2005 Sailing Software AB, 45 pages. |
Severance, “FireWire Finally Comes Home,” Michigan State University, Standards, Nov. 1998, pp. 117-118. (2 pages). |
Sinitsyn, “Synchronization Framework for Personal Mobile Servers,” Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PERCOMW'04), Proceedings of the Second IEEE Annual Conference, Piscataway, NJ, USA, IEEE, Mar. 14, 2004, pp. 208-212. (3 pages). |
Slay et al., “iPod Forensics: Forencically Sound Examination of an Apple iPod,” System Sciences, 2007. HICSS 2007. 40th Annual Hawaii Internation Conference on, pp. 1-9, Jan. 2007. (9 pages). |
Teener, “Understanding Fire Wire: The IEEE 1394 Standards and Specifications,” downloaded Oct. 16, 2001, wysiwyg:119/http:1lwww.chipcenter.com/networking/ieee—1394/main.html (5 pages). |
The First Office Action in Chinese Application No. 200910222182.6, mailed Nov. 23, 2011 (P3503CND1, 90911-778213). |
Vitaliano, “Why FireWire is Hot!Hot!Hot!” downloaded Oct. 16, 2001, “Impact FireWire.SideBar” http://www.vxm.com/21R.35.html (4 pages). |
Whittle, “Public Key Authentication Framework: Tutorial,” First Principles Consulting, Jun. 2, 1996, downloaded Oct. 6, 2004, http://www.ozemail.com.au/˜firstpr/crypto/pkaftute.htm (7 pages). |
Written Opinion dated Dec. 6, 2007 in PCT Application No. PCT/US2007/010888. |
International Search Report, dated Aug. 21, 2008, for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2007/072127, 5 pages. |
Written Opinion, dated Dec. 27, 2008, for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2007/072127, 5 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jan. 6, 2009, for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2007/072127, 6 pages. |
International Search Report, dated Mar. 17, 2011, for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2010/048130, 3 pages. |
Written Opinion, dated Mar. 9, 2012, for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2010/048130, 8 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability, dated Mar. 13, 2012, for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2010/048130, 9 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/474,552, mailed May 1, 2013, 23 pages. |
Notice of Allowability for U.S. Appl. No. 13/474,552, mailed May 31, 2013, 3 pages. |
European Office Action mailed on Apr. 9, 2013 for EP Patent Application No. 10194370.2, 7 pages. |
Australian Office Action mailed on Jul. 9, 2013 for AU Patnet Application No. 2011253604, 2 pages. |
Australian Office Action mailed on Feb. 19, 2013 for AU Patent Application No. 2010292318, 3 pages. |
Australian Notice of Acceptance mailed on May 2, 2013 for AU Patent Application No. 2010292318, 2 pages. |
Canadian Office Action mailed on Aug. 1, 2013 for CA Patent Application No. 2,651,048, 5 pages. |
Indian Office Action mailed on Sep. 6, 2013 for IN Patent Application No. 4519/KOLNP/2008, 2 pages. |
Japanese Office Action mailed on Aug. 6, 2013 for JP Patent Application No. 2010-011810, with English translation, 9 pages. |
Korean Office Action mailed on Oct. 1, 2013 for KR Patent Application No. 10-2012-7008925, with English Translation, 8 pages. |
Japanese Notice of Allowance mailed on Oct. 15, 2013 for JP Patent Application No. 2012*528878, 3 pages. |
Umeda, Katsuji et al., “Music Distribution Business Illustrated for Understanding,”; Japan Management Associate Management Center; Oct. 1, 2000, First Edition, pp. 179, 187, in Japanese. |
Notice of Allowance mailed on Sep. 11, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/538,941, 8 pages. |
Canadian Office Action mailed on Deceber 17, 2013 for CA Patent Application No. 2,591,164, 3 pages. |
Japanese Office Action mailed on Mar. 10, 2014 for JP Patent Application No. 2013-055601, 4 pages. |
Korean Notice of Allowance mailed on Apr. 7, 2014 for KR Patent Application No. 10-2012-7008925, 2 pages. |
Chinese Office Action mailed on Jan. 30, 2014 for CN Patent Application No. 201080039625.9, with English Trranslation, 34 pages. |
Chinese Office Action mailed on May 29, 2014 for CN Patent Application No. 2012101598.4, with English Translation, 22 pages. |
Chinese Office Action mailed on May 27, 2014 for CN Patent Application No. 20121036876.x, with English Translation, 20 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed on Nov. 24, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/328,368, 28 pages. |
Final Office Action mailed on May 11, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/328,368, 39 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed on Aug. 15, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/328,368, 13 pages. |
Notice of Allowance mailed on Feb. 7, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/328,368, 8 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed on Sep. 16, 2008 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/051,499, 18 pages. |
Final Office Action mailed on Mar. 19, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/051,499, 16 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed on Nov. 30, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/051,499, 19 pages. |
Notice of Allowance mailed on Jun. 24, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/051,499, 9 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority mailed on May 15, 2006 for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2005/045040, 10 pages. |
Canadian Office Action mailed on Oct. 7, 2014 for CA Patent Application No. 2,651,048, 4 pages. |
Australian Office Action mailed on Nov. 5, 2014 for AU Patent Application No. 2013203800, 2 pages. |
Japanese Office Action mailed on Oct. 14, 2014 for JP Patent Application No. 2013-252930, with English translation, 9 pages. |
Chinese Office Action mailed on Nov. 3, 2014 for CN Patent Application No. 201210136878.9, 15 pages. |
Chinese Office Action mailed on Nov. 24, 2014 for CN Patent Application No. 201080039625.9, 6 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed on Feb. 23, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/084,545, 6 pages. |
Chinese Office Action mailed on Feb. 16, 2015 for CN Patent Application No. 201080039625.9, 6 pages. |
Chinese Office Action mailed on Feb. 13, 2015 for CN Patent Application No. 201210101598.4, 19 pages. |
Canadian Office Action mailed on Mar. 11, 2015 for CA Patent Application No. 2,591,164, 4 pages. |
Chinese Office Action mailed on Mar. 31, 2015 for CN Patent Application No. 201210136876.X, 18 pages. |
Notice of Allowance mailed on Jun. 12, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/084,545, 5 pages. |
Chinese Office Action mailed on Jul. 8, 2015 for CN Patent Application No. 201210136878.9, 12 pages. |
Chinese Office Action mailed on Aug. 5, 2015 for CN Patent Application No. 201210101598.4, with English translation, 16 pages. |
Notice of Allowance mailed on Aug. 19, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/312,672, 10 pages. |
Canadian Office Action mailed on Oct. 22, 2015 for CA Patent Application No. 2,651,048, 7 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160110536 A1 | Apr 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60642340 | Jan 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11051499 | Feb 2005 | US |
Child | 12328368 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14312672 | Jun 2014 | US |
Child | 14979456 | US | |
Parent | 12328368 | Dec 2008 | US |
Child | 14312672 | US |