Cataracts are a major cause of blindness in the world and the most prevalent ocular disease. Visual disability from cataracts accounts for more than 8 million physician office visits per year. When the disability from cataracts affects or alters an individual's activities of daily living, surgical lens removal with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation is the preferred method of treating the functional limitations. In the United States, about 2.5 million cataract surgical procedures are performed annually, making it the most common surgery for Americans over the age of 65. About 97 percent of cataract surgery patients receive intraocular lens implants, with the annual costs for cataract surgery and associated care in the United States being upwards of $4 billion.
A cataract is any opacity of a patient's lens, whether it is a localized opacity or a diffuse general loss of transparency. To be clinically significant, however, the cataract must cause a significant reduction in visual acuity or a functional impairment. A cataract occurs as a result of aging or secondary to hereditary factors, trauma, inflammation, metabolic or nutritional disorders, or radiation. Age-related cataract conditions are the most common.
In treating a cataract, the surgeon removes the crystalline lens matrix from the lens capsule and replaces it with an intraocular lens (“IOL”) implant. The typical IOL provides a selected focal length that allows the patient to have fairly good distance vision. Since the lens can no longer accommodate, however, the patient typically needs glasses for reading.
More specifically, the imaging properties of the human eye are facilitated by several optical interfaces. A healthy youthful human eye has a total power of approximately 59 diopters, with the anterior surface of the cornea (e.g. the exterior surface, including the tear layer) providing about 48 diopters of power, while the posterior surface provides about −4 diopters. The crystalline lens, which is situated posterior of the pupil in a transparent elastic capsule supported by the ciliary muscles, provides about 15 diopters of power, and also performs the critical function of focusing images upon the retina. This focusing ability, referred to as “accommodation,” enables imaging of objects at various distances.
The power of the lens in a youthful eye can be adjusted from 15 diopters to about 29 diopters by adjusting the shape of the lens from a moderately convex shape to a highly convex shape. The mechanism generally accepted to cause this adjustment is that ciliary muscles supporting the capsule (and the lens contained therein), move between a relaxed state (corresponding to the moderately convex shape) to a contracted state (corresponding to the highly convex shape). Because the lens itself is composed of viscous, gelatinous transparent fibers, arranged in an “onion-like” layered structure, forces applied to the capsule by the ciliary muscles cause the lens to change shape.
Isolated from the eye, the relaxed capsule and lens take on a spherical shape. Within the eye, however, the capsule is connected around its circumference by approximately 70 tiny ligament fibers to the ciliary muscles, which in turn are attached to an inner surface of the eyeball. The ciliary muscles that support the lens and capsule therefore are believed to act in a sphincter muscular mode. Accordingly, when the ciliary muscles are relaxed, the capsule and lens are pulled about the circumference to a larger diameter, thereby flattening the lens, whereas when the ciliary muscles are contracted, the lens and capsule relax somewhat and assume a smaller diameter that approaches a more spherical shape, thereby increasing the diopter power of the lens.
As noted above, the youthful eye has approximately 14 diopters of accommodation. As a person ages, the lens hardens and becomes less elastic, so that by about age 45-50, accommodation is reduced to about 2 diopters. At a later age the lens may be considered to be non-accommodating, a condition know as “presbyopia”. Because the imaging distance is fixed, presbyopia typically entails the need for bi-focals to facilitate near and far vision.
Apart from age-related loss of accommodation ability, such loss is innate to the placement of IOLs for the treatment of cataracts. IOLs are generally single element lenses made from a suitable polymer material, such as acrylics or silicones. After placement, accommodation is no longer possible, although this ability is typically already lost for persons receiving an IOL. There is significant need to provide for accommodation in IOL products so that IOL recipients will have accommodating ability.
Although previously known workers in the field of accommodating IOLs have made some progress, the relative complexity of the methods and apparatus developed to date have prevented widespread commercialization of such devices. Previously known devices have proved too complex to be practical to construct or have achieved only limited success, due to the inability to provide accommodation of more than 1-2 diopters.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,443,506 to Garabet describes an accommodating fluid-filled lens wherein electrical potentials generated by contraction of the ciliary muscles cause changes in the index of refraction of fluid carried within a central optic portion. U.S. Pat. No. 4,816,031 to Pfoff discloses an IOL with a hard PMMA lens separated by a single chamber from a flexible thin lens layer that uses microfluid pumps to vary a volume of fluid between the PMMA lens portion and the thin layer portion and provide accommodation. U.S. Pat. No. 4,932,966 to Christie et al. discloses an intraocular lens comprising a thin flexible layer sealed along its periphery to a support layer, wherein forces applied to fluid reservoirs in the haptics vary a volume of fluid between the plurality of layers to provide accommodation.
Although fluid-actuated mechanisms such as described in the aforementioned patents have been investigated, commercially available accommodating lenses, such as developed by Eyeonics, Inc. of Aliso Viejo, Calif., rely on ciliary muscle contraction of the IOL haptics to vault the optic towards or away from the retina to adjust the focus of the device.
One promising line of IOL apparatus and methods is disclosed in commonly assigned U.S. Patent Publication 2005/0119740 A1 to Esch et al. There, apparatus and methods are described in which a patient's vision may be improved by implantation of an IOL having one or more pistons disposed at or near the center of a deformable surface of the IOL. Due to the potential for reflections to arise during movement of the piston near the optical axis of the IOL, it may be desirable to relocate the actuators to a peripheral portion of the IOL.
In view of the foregoing, it would be desirable to provide apparatus and methods that restore appropriate optical focusing power action to the human eye.
It further would be desirable to provide methods and apparatus wherein a dynamic lens surface may be effectively manipulated by the ciliary muscular mechanisms within the eye.
It still further would be desirable to provide methods and apparatus that utilize pressure applied by the accommodating muscular action to deform an optical surface of the IOL. In particular, it would be desirable to provide an IOL in which muscular pressure may be applied through one or more actuators to obtain a mechanical advantage.
It is yet further desirable to provide methods and apparatus that reduce the possibility of reflections within the IOL arising due to movement of mechanical actuators situated along or near the optical axis of the IOL.
In view of the foregoing, it is an object of the present invention to provide apparatus and methods that restore appropriate optical focusing power action to the human eye.
It is a further object of this invention to provide methods and apparatus wherein a dynamic lens surface may be effectively manipulated by the ciliary muscular mechanisms within the eye.
It is another object of the present invention to provide methods and apparatus that utilize pressure applied by the accommodating muscular action to deform an optical surface of the IOL.
It is a further object of this invention to provide methods and apparatus for applying muscular pressure, through one or more actuators, to obtain a mechanical advantage in altering the optical parameters of one or more surfaces of the IOL.
It is yet a further object of this invention to provide methods and apparatus that reduce the possibility of reflections within the IOL arising due to movement of mechanical actuators situated along or near the optical axis of the IOL.
These and other objects of the present invention are accomplished by providing a lens in which force exerted on a fluid reservoir by the movement of the ciliary muscles, zonules and capsule is applied to a dynamic optical surface.
In accordance with the principles of the invention, an IOL is provided having a dynamic lens surface that deflects in response to forces applied to one or more haptics. In a preferred embodiment, the deformable surface is anchored to a substrate near the optical axis of the IOL, and is deformed from an accommodated state to an unaccommodated state by deflection of the periphery of the deformable surface. In this manner, the IOL of the present invention reduces the possibility that light entering the IOL may be reflected due to movement of an actuator disposed at or near the optical axis of the IOL.
In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, a reservoir containing a fluid is disposed in a haptic portion of the IOL, so that compressive forces arising due to movement of the ciliary muscles are transmitted via the haptic portion and fluid to deform the dynamic surface, thereby varying the accommodation of the IOL.
Methods of using the lens of the present invention also are provided.
All publications and patent applications mentioned in this application are herein incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each individual publication or patent application was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference.
The novel features of the invention are set forth with particularity in the appended claims. A better understanding of the features and advantages of the present invention will be obtained by reference to the following detailed description that sets forth illustrative embodiments, in which the principles of the invention are utilized, and the accompanying drawings of which:
The present invention is directed to an in-situ accommodating intraocular lens system. In accordance with the principles of the present invention, methods and apparatus are provided wherein a lens has an optic element comprising a deformable surface and an actuator that selectively deflects the deformable surface to change an optical power of the lens. In accordance with the principles of the present invention, a central portion of the deformable surface is anchored to a substrate and the lens transitions between the accommodated and unaccommodated positions by deflection of a peripheral region of the deformable surface.
Referring to
Isolated from the eye, the relaxed capsule and lens takes on a spherical shape. However, as described hereinabove, when suspended within the eye by ligament fibers 14, capsule 15 moves between a moderately convex shape (when the ciliary muscles are relaxed) to a highly convex shape (when the ciliary muscles are contracted). As depicted in
As discussed hereinabove, commercially available accommodating lenses, such as the Crystalens device by Eyeonics, Inc., Aliso Viejo, Calif., typically involve converting diametral movements of the ciliary muscle into forward and backward movement of the optic portion of the IOL relative to the retina. This approach is thought to be required because, following extraction of a cataract-effected lens, the capsular bag is very loose, and the ligament fibers that couple the capsule to the ciliary muscles are no longer in tension. Devices such as the Crystalens thus do not employ the natural accommodation mechanisms described above, but instead rely directly on radially inward compressive forces applied by the ciliary muscle to the haptics of the IOL.
In accordance with principles of the present invention, compressive forces applied to the haptics of the IOL are employed to provide accommodation by deflecting a dynamic surface of the lens. This deflection causes a variation in the optical path of light passing through the lens, thus altering its optical parameters.
Referring now to
Substrate 21 preferably comprises a sturdy transparent polymer and includes posterior lens 25, haptics 26, lower chamber 27, reservoirs 28, passageways 29 and lower relief reservoirs 30. Lower chamber 27 communicates with reservoirs 28 disposed on the ends of haptics 26 via passageways 29. Lower chamber 27, reservoirs 28, passageways 29 and lower relief reservoirs 30 are filled with transparent fluid 31. The outwardly directed surfaces of haptics 26 comprise a resilient elastic material that permits force applied to those surfaces by the ciliary muscles to cause fluid to move from reservoirs 28 through passageways 29 into lower chamber 27.
Actuator element 22 comprises disk-shaped member 32 having a plurality of cells 33 extending upwardly from its upper surface. Each cell 33 illustratively comprises an annular sidewall 34 and top 35. The relative thicknesses of member 32 and sidewalls 34 and tops 35 are selected so that when pressurized fluid is introduced into lower chamber 27, tops 35 of cells 33 extend axially upward. Illustratively, cells 33 are arranged in a ring at a predetermined radius from the optical axis of lens 20, although more or fewer cells 33 may be employed, and their location selected to enhance deflection of layer 23, as described hereinbelow.
Anterior element 24 preferably comprises a rigid transparent material, and includes anterior lens 36, and upper relief reservoirs 37. The interior surface of anterior element 24 is convex and forms upper chamber 38, which accommodates upward motion of flexible layer 23, as described hereinbelow. Upper relief reservoirs 37 are disposed in alignment with lower relief chambers 30 in substrate 21, outside the optical path of anterior lens 24. Upper chamber 38 communicates with upper relief reservoirs 37 via passageways 39, and is filled with transparent fluid 40.
Flexible layer 23 is affixed around its circumference to substrate 21 and is disposed in contact with tops 35 of cells 33. Transparent fluid 41 is contained within space 42 between the upper surface of actuator element 22 and lower surface of layer 23. Lower relief reservoirs 30 communicate with space 42 via passageways 43 disposed in substrate 21. A portion of layer 23 divides upper relief reservoirs 37 from lower relief reservoirs 30, for purposes to be described hereinafter. Fluid 41 disposed in space 42, preferably has the same index of refraction as fluid 41 in lower chamber 27, and a different index of refraction than fluid 40 contained in upper chamber 38.
When assembled as shown in
Simultaneously, because lower relief reservoirs 30 communicate with space 42, fluid 41 is drawn from lower relief reservoirs 30 as layer 23 is deflected upward by cells 33. Consequently, the portions of layer 23 that divide upper relief reservoirs 37 from lower relief reservoirs 30 serve as diaphragms that permit fluid to be simultaneously displaced into one reservoir and withdrawn from the other. This enables fluids 40 and 41 to pass freely in and out of the optical space in order to balance relative volumes of fluid, the total volume of fluids 40 and 41 remaining constant.
Movement of layer 23, and the accompanying displacement of volumes of fluid 40 in upper chamber 38 with a corresponding volume of fluid 41 of a different index of fraction in space 42, changes the optical parameters of the lens, thereby moving the focus of the lens from near to far or vice-versa. Posterior lens 25, which in this case comprises a solid material, also provides additional optical power. Posterior lens 25 also may provide optical index dispersion so as to optimize aberration characteristics, including wave aberration of all order, or chromatic aberration.
When the ciliary muscles relax, tops 35 of cells 33 contract, and layer 23 resiliently contracts to its original position. This in turn forces excess fluid 41 in space 42 back into lower relief reservoirs 30. In addition, as the pressure in upper chamber 38 is reduced, fluid 40 is drawn out of upper relief reservoirs 37 and into upper chamber 38.
In the embodiment of
Relevant to the IOL of the present invention, cells 33 of the device depicted in
If it is desired that surface 50 assume a flatter configuration 50′ that provides less optical focusing power (shown in dotted line in
As a further alternative, to obtain most efficient use of fluid power, e.g., to obtain maximal change in optical power for a given movement of surface 50 (corresponding to surface configuration 50′″ in
The foregoing discussion of fulcrum points may be advantageously employed not only in a two fluid system as described in U.S. Patent Publication No. 2004/0169816 A1, but also in a system such as described in commonly assigned U.S. Patent Publication No. 2005/0119740. In the accommodating IOL described in that application, one or more actuators disposed near the optical axis of a deformable lens element are employed to transition the lens between accommodated and unaccommodated states.
In accordance with the principles of the present invention, the fulcrum concepts discussed above with respect to
Referring now to
As will be explained more fully below, IOL 60 assumes an accommodated position in its relaxed state, i.e., when no outside forces are acting on it. After implantation in a patient's eye, the IOL assumes the accommodated configuration when the ciliary muscles contract and the capsule relaxes. In contrast, when the ciliary muscles relax and the capsule is pulled taut, forces applied by the capsule to the haptic cause the IOL to transition to the unaccommodated state.
IOL 60 comprises optic portion 61 and haptic portion 62. Optic portion 61 includes anterior lens element 63, substrate 64 and posterior lens surface 65. Haptic portion 62 illustratively comprises four deformable tubular members 66 mounted on extensions 67 projecting from substrate 64. It should be understood that the invention may be practiced with more or less tubular members than shown in
Substrate 64 preferably comprises a sturdy transparent polymer illustratively has posterior lens surface 65 integrally formed thereon. Anterior lens element 63 is coupled to the center of substrate 64 by anchor 68, while the periphery of the lens element is sealed to the edge of substrate 64 by sidewall 69. Anterior lens element 63 also includes a flexible circular partition 70 coupled to the substrate to define annular chamber 71. Space 72 defined by anterior lens element 63 and substrate 64 inward of partition 70 preferably is filled with fluid 73, such as a silicone oil, having a refractive index that matches the surrounding components of optic portion 61.
Substrate 64 includes one or more relief reservoirs 74 disposed near the periphery of posterior lens surface 65 that communicate with space 72 via channels 75. Substrate 64 further includes peripheral passageway 76 that communicates with annular chamber 71 and the interior of tubular members 66 via passageways 77. The interior of tubular members 66, annular chamber 71, peripheral passageway 76 and passageways 77 all are filled with fluid 78 having an index of refraction matched to the surrounding components. Fluid 78 preferably, but need not be, the same as fluid 73 in space 72.
Tubular members 66 include flexible fluid-tight endcaps 79 and are attached to extensions 67 of substrate 64 using a suitable biocompatible adhesive, thermal bonding, or other methods known in the art. Tubular member 66 preferably has a substantially circular cross-section in the relaxed state, i.e., when no forces are acting on it. The tubular members of haptic portion 62 are configured so that forces applied by the capsule to the anterior and posterior faces of the tubular members causes the tubular members to transition to an ellipsoidal shape, thereby inducing fluid 78 to flow through passageways 77 and into annular chamber 71 via peripheral passageway 76. When the lateral forces applied to the tubular member subside, for example, when the capsule becomes loose as a consequence of ciliary muscle contraction, tubular members 66 return to their unstressed shapes, causing fluid to flow from annular chamber 71 back to the interior of the tubular members.
In accordance with the principles of the present invention, anchor 68 serves as the function of fulcrum point 51 of
In operation, when implanted in an eye, tubular members 66 of haptic portion 62 have a substantially circular shape when the ciliary muscles are contracted. This corresponds to the maximum volume of the interior of tubular members 66 and the minimum volume of fluid 73 in annular chamber 71. When the ciliary muscles relax, the capsule is pulled taut by the zonules and applies compressive forces to the anterior and posterior surfaces of tubular members 66. This causes the tubular members to deform to a non-circular cross-section, thereby squeezing fluid into annular chamber 71. Sidewall 69 and partition 70 expand responsive to the increased volume in annular chamber 71, thereby lifting the edge of anterior lens element 63. The increased volume of space 72 arising from this movement is made up by transfer of fluid 78 from flexible reservoirs 74 to space 72 via passageways 75. These actions result in IOL 60 assuming a less accommodated configuration.
When the ciliary muscles relax, tubular members 66 are no longer subjected to lateral compressive forces, and return to their unstressed geometry. This in turn reduces the volume of fluid in annular chamber 71, causing sidewall 69 and partition 70 to return to their undeformed shapes, thereby increasing the convexity of anterior lens element 63. Fluid 82 is likewise forced from space 72 between anterior lens element 63 and substrate 64, through passageway 75 and back into flexible reservoirs 74. IOL 60 thus returns to its accommodated configuration.
IOL 60 may be manufactured as described above with predetermined volumes of fluids 73 and 78. Alternatively, tubular members 66 and/or flexible reservoirs may comprise a semi-permeable osmotic material and IOL manufactured to contain smaller amounts of fluids 73 and 78 than may be desired for operation of the IOL. In this alternative embodiment, IOL 60 may be implanted in a slightly collapsed state, thereby facilitating insertion. Subsequently, the osmotic gradient may cause water in the eye to permeate the tubular member and/or flexible reservoirs to increase the volume of fluids 73 and 78 to provide correction functioning of IOL 60.
Referring now to
IOL 80 assumes an accommodated position when no outside forces are acting on it. After implantation in a patient's eye, the IOL assumes the accommodated configuration when the ciliary muscles contract. In contrast, when the ciliary muscles relax and the capsule is pulled taut by the zonules, the capsule applies forces to the haptic portion of the IOL, which in turn causes the IOL to transition to the unaccommodated state.
IOL 80 comprises optic portion 81 and haptic portion 82. Optic portion 81 shapes and focuses light on the optic nerve while haptic portion 82 orients and supports the IOL with the capsule and actuates the accommodating mechanism of the IOL. As depicted in
Anterior portion 83 comprises a flexible optically transparent material that forms anterior lens element 85. Anterior lens element 85 includes anchor 86 that extends posteriorly from the center of the lens element 85. Lens element 85 is coupled around its edge 87 to haptic half 88 by flexible membrane 89. Spacers 90 also extend posteriorly from the interior surface of anterior portion 83. Posterior portion 84 comprises sturdy optically transparent polymer substrate 91, posterior lens surface 92 and posterior haptic half 93, peripheral step 94 and receptacle 95.
Anterior portion 83 is configured to attach to posterior portion 84 so that anchor 85 is fixedly received within receptacle 95, spacers 90 seat against peripheral step 94, and posterior haptic half 93 sealingly mates with anterior haptic half 88, as depicted in
In accordance with the present invention, haptic halves 88 and 93 of haptic portion 82 comprise a resilient elastic material that permits force applied to those surfaces to the haptic portion to deform. Preferably, when the ciliary muscles contract, the haptic portion is in an unstressed state and assumes a substantially circular cross-section. This corresponds to a maximum internal volume of chamber 96 and a minimum volume of space 97.
When the ciliary muscles relax, the zonules pull the capsule taut, thereby applying compressive forces to the anterior and posterior faces of the haptic portion which in turn cause fluid 99 to pass from chamber 96 through channels 98 and into space 97. Fluid entering space 97 causes edge 87 of anterior lens element 85 to lift in the anterior direction, thereby reducing the convexity of the anterior lens element and reducing the diopter power of the lens. The flexible nature of membrane 89 permits edge 87 to freely deflect when the volume of space 97 increases.
The volume of fluid 99 preferably is selected so that when no external pressure is applied to IOL 80, fluid 99 fills the interior of the IOL and anterior lens element 85 has its most convex shape. Therefore, when pressure is applied to haptic portion 82, fluid 99 migrates beneath anterior lens element 85 to cause IOL 80 to transition to the unaccommodated state.
In addition, the anterior surface of substrate 91 preferably has a predetermined anterior profile, so that in the event of a loss of fluid 99 from the IOL, e.g., resulting in a failure of a seal, the IOL conforms to the anterior profile of the substrate and thus still provides the patient with a desired degree of correction. In a preferred embodiment, substrate 91 is symmetrical, such that peripheral step 94 has a uniform depth. In this case, anterior portion 81 may be attached to substrate 91 at any relative rotational angle.
Anterior lens element 85 may have a constant thickness from the center to the outer edge, or a variable thickness. For example, the anterior lens element may be thinner near anchor 86 with an increasing thickness toward edge 87. Alternatively, the anterior lens element may be thicker near the anchor with a decreasing thickness toward edge 87.
While preferred embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described herein, it will be obvious to those skilled in the art that such embodiments are provided by way of example only. Numerous variations, changes, and substitutions will now occur to those skilled in the art without departing from the invention. It should be understood that various alternatives to the embodiments of the invention described herein may be employed in practicing the invention. It is intended that the following claims define the scope of the invention and that methods and structures within the scope of these claims and their equivalents be covered thereby.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/715,221, filed Mar. 6, 2007; which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/252,916 filed Oct. 17, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,217,288; which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/971,598, filed Oct. 22, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,261,737; which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/734,514, filed Dec. 12, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,122,053; which claims the benefit of priority from U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/433,046, filed Dec. 12, 2002; all of which are incorporated by reference in their entirety as if fully set forth herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4111995 | Nelson | Sep 1978 | A |
4253199 | Banko | Mar 1981 | A |
4254509 | Tennant | Mar 1981 | A |
4304895 | Loshaek | Dec 1981 | A |
4373218 | Schachar | Feb 1983 | A |
4409691 | Levy | Oct 1983 | A |
4423809 | Mazzocco | Jan 1984 | A |
4435856 | L'Esperance | Mar 1984 | A |
4466705 | Michelson | Aug 1984 | A |
4490860 | Rainin | Jan 1985 | A |
4494254 | Lopez | Jan 1985 | A |
4512040 | McClure | Apr 1985 | A |
4528311 | Beard et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4575373 | Johnson | Mar 1986 | A |
4585457 | Kalb | Apr 1986 | A |
4604295 | Humphreys | Aug 1986 | A |
4615701 | Woods | Oct 1986 | A |
4620954 | Singer et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4685921 | Peyman | Aug 1987 | A |
4685922 | Peyman | Aug 1987 | A |
4693717 | Michelson | Sep 1987 | A |
4720286 | Bailey et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4731078 | Stoy et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4731079 | Stoy | Mar 1988 | A |
4731080 | Galin | Mar 1988 | A |
4764423 | Yamaguchi et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4784485 | Ho | Nov 1988 | A |
4787903 | Grendahl | Nov 1988 | A |
4790847 | Woods | Dec 1988 | A |
4813956 | Gupta | Mar 1989 | A |
4816031 | Pfoff | Mar 1989 | A |
4836201 | Patton et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4842601 | Smith | Jun 1989 | A |
4848343 | Wallsten et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4888012 | Horn et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4892543 | Turley | Jan 1990 | A |
4902293 | Feaster | Feb 1990 | A |
4919151 | Grubbs et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4932966 | Christie et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4946469 | Sarfarazi | Aug 1990 | A |
4950289 | Krasner | Aug 1990 | A |
4963148 | Sulc et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4994082 | Richards et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
4995879 | Dougherty | Feb 1991 | A |
4995880 | Galib | Feb 1991 | A |
5015254 | Greite | May 1991 | A |
5035710 | Nakada et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5047051 | Cumming | Sep 1991 | A |
5061914 | Busch et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5066301 | Wiley | Nov 1991 | A |
5078740 | Walman | Jan 1992 | A |
5145884 | Yamamoto et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5145935 | Hayashi | Sep 1992 | A |
5152789 | Willis | Oct 1992 | A |
5171266 | Wiley et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5200430 | Federman | Apr 1993 | A |
5201763 | Brady et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5213579 | Yamada et al. | May 1993 | A |
5224957 | Gasser et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5235003 | Ward et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5251993 | Sigourney | Oct 1993 | A |
5275623 | Sarfarazi | Jan 1994 | A |
5275624 | Hara et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5288293 | O'Donnell, Jr. | Feb 1994 | A |
5290892 | Namdaran et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5326347 | Cumming | Jul 1994 | A |
5391590 | Gerace et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5405386 | Rheinish et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5443506 | Garabet | Aug 1995 | A |
5444106 | Zhou et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5444135 | Cheradame et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5476514 | Cumming | Dec 1995 | A |
5489302 | Skottun | Feb 1996 | A |
5496366 | Cumming | Mar 1996 | A |
5506300 | Ward et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5512609 | Yang | Apr 1996 | A |
5578081 | McDonald | Nov 1996 | A |
5585049 | Grisoni et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5593436 | Langerman | Jan 1997 | A |
5607472 | Thompson | Mar 1997 | A |
5628795 | Langerman | May 1997 | A |
5633504 | Collins et al. | May 1997 | A |
5665822 | Bitler et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5674282 | Cumming | Oct 1997 | A |
5697973 | Peyman et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5702441 | Zhou | Dec 1997 | A |
5774273 | Bornhorst | Jun 1998 | A |
5776191 | Mazzocco | Jul 1998 | A |
5776192 | McDonald | Jul 1998 | A |
5843188 | McDonald | Dec 1998 | A |
5891931 | Leboeuf et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5928282 | Nigam | Jul 1999 | A |
5964802 | Anello et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5984962 | Anello et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6013101 | Israel | Jan 2000 | A |
6015842 | Leboeuf et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6102539 | Tucker | Aug 2000 | A |
6117171 | Skottun | Sep 2000 | A |
6124980 | Cerbell | Sep 2000 | A |
6139576 | Doyle et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6160084 | Langer et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6176878 | Gwon et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6180687 | Hammer et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6188526 | Sasaya et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6190410 | Lamielle et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6195807 | Chou | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6197059 | Cumming | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6217612 | Woods | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6225367 | Chaouk et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6229641 | Kosaka | May 2001 | B1 |
6299641 | Woods | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6302911 | Hanna | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6322589 | Cumming | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6342073 | Cumming et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6348437 | Avery et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6387126 | Cumming | May 2002 | B1 |
6388043 | Langer et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6406494 | Laguette et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6413262 | Saishin et al. | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6423094 | Sarfarazi | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6436092 | Peyman | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6443985 | Woods | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6450642 | Jethmalani et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6464725 | Skotton | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6488708 | Sarfarazi | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6493151 | Schachar | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6503276 | Lang et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6517577 | Callahan et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6551354 | Ghazizadeh et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6552860 | Alden | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6554859 | Lang et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6585768 | Hamano et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6589550 | Hodd et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6592621 | Domino | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6599317 | Weinschenk, III et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6601956 | Jean et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6610350 | Suzuki et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6616691 | Tran | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6616692 | Glick et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6638304 | Azar | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6638305 | Laguette | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6638306 | Cumming | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6645245 | Preussner | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6645246 | Weinschenk, III et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6656223 | Brady | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6660035 | Lang et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6692525 | Brady et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6695881 | Peng et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6709108 | Levine et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6712848 | Wolf et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6730123 | Klopotek | May 2004 | B1 |
6743388 | Sridharan et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6749632 | Sandstedt et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6749634 | Hanna | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6786934 | Zadno-Azizi et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6818158 | Pham et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6827738 | Willis et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6836374 | Esch et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6860601 | Shadduck | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6878320 | Alderson et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6884261 | Zadno-Azizi et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6899732 | Zadno-Azizi et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6899850 | Haywood et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6914247 | Duggan et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6926736 | Peng et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6935743 | Shadduck | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6949093 | Peyman | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6966649 | Shadduck | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6969403 | Peng et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7001374 | Peyman | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7060094 | Shahinpoor et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7068439 | Esch | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7074227 | Portney | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7122053 | Esch | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7144423 | McDonald | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7217288 | Esch et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7241312 | Lai et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7247168 | Esch et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7247689 | Makker et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7261737 | Esch et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7264351 | Shadduck | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7276619 | Kunzler et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7278739 | Shadduck | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7311194 | Jin et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7438723 | Esch | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7453646 | Lo | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7485144 | Esch | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7494505 | Kappelhof et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7675686 | Lo et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7763069 | Brady et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7776088 | Shadduck | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7988292 | Neal et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8162927 | Peyman | Apr 2012 | B2 |
20010001836 | Cumming | May 2001 | A1 |
20010016771 | Cumming | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010039449 | Johnson et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020046783 | Johnson et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020055777 | Cumming et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020072795 | Green | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020095212 | Boehm | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020107568 | Zadno-Azizi et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020111678 | Zadno-Azizi et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020116057 | Ting et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020116058 | Zadno-Azizi et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020116059 | Zadno-Azizi et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020116060 | Nguyen et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020116061 | Zadno-Azizi et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020133228 | Sarver | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020161434 | Laguette et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020161435 | Portney | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020177896 | Israel | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020193876 | Lang et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030003295 | Dreher et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030004569 | Haefliger | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030018384 | Valyunin et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030042176 | Alderson et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030050695 | Lin et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030050696 | Cumming | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030060878 | Shadduck | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030060881 | Glick et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030078656 | Nguyen | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030078657 | Zadno-Azizi et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030078658 | Zadno-Azizi | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030083744 | Khoury | May 2003 | A1 |
20030109925 | Ghazizadeh et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030109926 | Portney | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030130732 | Sarfarazi | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030135272 | Brady et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030149480 | Shadduck | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030158599 | Brady et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030171808 | Phillips | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030183960 | Buazza et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030187505 | Liao | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030199977 | Cumming | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030236376 | Kindt-Larsen et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040001180 | Epstein | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040006386 | Valint et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040006387 | Kelman | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040008419 | Schachar | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040015236 | Sarfarazi | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040039446 | McNicholas | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040054408 | Glick et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040059343 | Shearer et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040082993 | Woods | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040082994 | Woods et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040085511 | Uno et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040085515 | Roffman et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040088050 | Norrby et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040111151 | Paul et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040111152 | Kelman | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040111153 | Woods et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040127984 | Paul et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040162612 | Portney et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040181279 | Nun | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040230203 | Yaguchi | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050021139 | Shadduck | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050113911 | Peyman | May 2005 | A1 |
20050125000 | Tourrette et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050131535 | Woods | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050165410 | Zadno-Azizi et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050251253 | Gross | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050264756 | Esch | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060069433 | Nun | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060100703 | Evans et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060116763 | Simpson | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060134173 | Liu et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060183041 | Erk et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060184181 | Cole et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060200167 | Peterson et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060253196 | Woods | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070004886 | Schorzman et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070005136 | Richardson | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070021831 | Clarke | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070050023 | Bessiere et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070078515 | Brady | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070088433 | Esch et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070100445 | Shadduck | May 2007 | A1 |
20070106377 | Smith et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070156236 | Stenger | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070203578 | Scholl et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070213817 | Esch et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070244561 | Ben Nun | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070299487 | Shadduck | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080004699 | Ben Nun | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080015689 | Esch et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080033449 | Cole et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080046074 | Smith et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080046075 | Esch et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080139769 | Iwamoto et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080200982 | Your | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080269987 | Barron et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080300680 | Joshua | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080306587 | Your | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080306588 | Smiley et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090005865 | Smiley et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090027661 | Choi et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090030425 | Smiley et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090149952 | Shadduck | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090312836 | Pinchuk et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100039709 | Lo | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100131058 | Shadduck | May 2010 | A1 |
20100179653 | Argento et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100228344 | Shadduck | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100228346 | Esch | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110118834 | Lo et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20120078364 | Stenger | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120179249 | Coleman | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120226351 | Peyman | Sep 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0898972 | Mar 1999 | EP |
2784575 | Apr 2000 | FR |
02-167157 | Jun 1990 | JP |
07-044938 | May 1995 | JP |
9294754 | Nov 1997 | JP |
10-206609 | Aug 1998 | JP |
11276509 | Oct 1999 | JP |
1810052 | Apr 1993 | SU |
WO 9706751 | Feb 1997 | WO |
WO 0041650 | Jul 2000 | WO |
WO 0064655 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO 0160286 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO 0189435 | Nov 2001 | WO |
WO 0197742 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO 02051338 | Jul 2002 | WO |
WO 2004010895 | Feb 2004 | WO |
WO 2004046768 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO 2004052242 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO 2004054471 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO 2004072689 | Aug 2004 | WO |
WO 2005084588 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO 2006004707 | Jan 2006 | WO |
WO 2006047383 | May 2006 | WO |
WO 2006088440 | Aug 2006 | WO |
WO 2007005529 | Jan 2007 | WO |
WO 2007030095 | Mar 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Anvar et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 13/033,474 entitled “Fluid for Accommodating Intraocular Lenses,” filed Feb. 23, 2011. |
Scholl et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 13/193,487 entitled “Accommodating Intraocular Lenses,” filed Jul. 28, 2011. |
Smiley et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 13/193,983 entitled “Accommodating Intraocular Lenses,” filed Jul. 29, 2011. |
Smiley et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 13/194,004 entitled “Accommodating Intraocular Lenses,” filed Jul. 29, 2011. |
Hildebrand et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 13/180,427 entitled “Intraocular lens delivery devices and methods of use,” filed Jul. 11, 2011. |
Baughman et al., “Negative poisson's ratios for extreme states fo matter,” Science, vol. 288, pp. 2018-2022, Jun. 16, 2000. |
Baughman, “Avoiding the shrink,” Nature, vol. 425, pp. 667, Oct. 16, 2003. |
Conlisk, A. T. et al; Mass Transfer and Flow in Electrically Charged Micro- and Nano-channels; Analytical Chemistry, vol. 74; iss. 9; pp. 2139-2150; 2002. |
Dubbelman et al.; The Thickness of the Aging Human Lens Obtained from Corrected Scheimpflug Images; Optometry & Vison Science; vo. 78; iss. 6; pp. 411-416; Jun. 2001. |
Corder, P. F.; Electricity can pump medicine in implanted medical devices; Ohio State Research News; 3 pgs.; May 2, 2002 (printed from internet Aug. 19, 2010). |
Gordon, “Applications of shape memory polyurethanes,” Proceedings of the First Intl Conf. on Shape Memory and Superelastic Tech., Asilomar Conference Center, Pacific Grove, CA, USA, pp. 115-120, 1994. |
Gruber et al.; Exhaustive soxhlet extraction for the complete removal of residual compounds . . . ; Journal of Biomedical Materials Research; vol. 53; No. 5; pp. 445-448; Mar. 2000. |
Jeon et al., “Shape memory and nanostructure in poly(norbornyl-POSS) copolymers,” Polymer International, vol. 49, pp. 453-457, 2000. |
Kim et al., “Polyurethanes having shape memory effects,” Polymer, vol. 37, No. 26, pp. 5781-5793, 1996. |
Lakes et al., “Dramatically stiffer elastic composite materials due to negative stiffness phase?,” Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, vol. 50, pp. 979-1009, 2002. |
Lakes et al., “Extreme damping in composite materials with negative-stiffness inclusions,” Nature, vol. 410, pp. 565-567, Mar. 29, 2001. |
Lakes et al., “Microbuckling instability in elastomeric cellular sollids,” J. Materials Science, vol. 28, pp. 4667-4672, 1993. |
Lakes, “A broader view of membranes,” Nature, vol. 414, pp. 503-504, Nov. 29, 2001. |
Lakes, “Extreme damping in compliant composites with a negative-stiffness phase,” Philosophical Magazine Letters, vol. 81, No. 2, pp. 95-100, 2001. |
Lakes, “Extreme damping in composite materials with a negative stiffness phase,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 86, No. 13, pp. 2897-2900, Mar. 26, 2001. |
Lakes, “Lateral deformations in extreme matter,” Science, vol. 288, pp. 1976, Jun. 2000; 3 pgs. |
Lakes, “Negative poisson's ratio materials,” Science, vol. 238, pp. 551, Oct. 23, 1987. |
Lakes, “No contractile obligations,” Nature, vol. 358, pp. 713-714, 1992. |
Lendlein et al., “Biodegradable, elastic shape-memory polymers for potential biomedical applications”, Science; vol. 296; pp. 1673-1676; May 31, 2002. |
Lendlein et al., “Shape-memory polymers,” Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.; vol. 41; pp. 2034-2057; 2002. |
Li et al., “Crystallinity and morphology of segmented polyurethanes with different soft-segment length,” Journal of Applied Polymer Science, vol. 62, pp. 631-638, 1996. |
Liu et al., “Thermomechanical characterization of a tailored series of shape memory polymers,” Journal of Applied Medical Polymers, vol. 6, No. 2, 2002. |
Mather et al., “Strain recovery in POSS hybrid thermoplastics,” Polymer Preprints, vol. 41, No. 1, pp. 528-529, 2000. |
Metcalfe et al., “Cold hibernated elastic memory foams for endovascular interventions,” Biomaterials, vol. 24, pp. 491-497, 2003. |
Takahashi et al., “Structure and properties of shape-memory polyurethane block copolymers,” Journal of Applied Polymer Science, vol. 60, pp. 1061-1069, 1996. |
Tehrani et al.; Capsule measuring ring to predict capsular bag diameter and follow its course after foldable intraocular lens implantation; J Cataract Refract Surg.; vol. 29; No. 11; pp. 2127-2134; Nov. 2003. |
Tobushi et al., “Thermomechanical properties of shape memory polymers of polyurethane series and their applications,” Journal de Physique IV, Colloque C1, vol. 6, pp. 377-384, 1996. |
Vass et al.; Prediction of pseudophakic capsular bag diameter based on biometric variables; J Cataract Refract Surg.; vol. 25; pp. 1376-1381; 1999. |
Wang et al., “Deformation of extreme viscoelastic metals and composites,” Materials Science and Enginerring A, vol. 370, pp. 41-49, 2004. |
Wang et al., “Extreme stiffness systems due to negative stiffness elements,” American Journal of Physics, vol. 72, No. 1, pp. 40-50, Jan. 2004. |
Wang et al., “Stable extremely-high-damping discrete viscoelastic systems due to native stiffness elements,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 84, No. 22, pp. 4451-4453, May 31, 2004. |
Wyant et al; “Basic Wavefront Aberration Theory for Optical Metrology,” Applied Optics and Optical Engineering, vol. XI, 1992: pp. 1, 28-39. |
Xu et al., “Basic negative poisson's ratio microstructures by soft lithography,” Advanced Materials, vol. 11, No. 14, 1999, pp. 1186-1189, 1999. |
Shadduck, John H.; U.S. Appl. No. 12/852,733 entitled “Intraocular Lens System and Method for Power Adjustment,” filed Aug. 9, 2010. |
Hildebrand et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 12/872,314 entitled “Lens Capsule Size Estimation,” filed Aug. 31, 2010. |
Shadduck, John H.; U.S. Appl. No. 13/300,245 entitled “Accommodating Intraocular Lenses and Methods of Use,” filed Nov. 18, 2011. |
Matthews, Gregory V.; U.S. Appl. No. 13/427,617 entitled “Intraocular Lens Loading Systems and Methods of Use,” filed Mar. 22, 2012. |
USPTO, “Office Action,” corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 12/782,639, mailed on Jan. 9, 2012, 33 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100324672 A1 | Dec 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60433046 | Dec 2002 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11715221 | Mar 2007 | US |
Child | 12853892 | US | |
Parent | 11252916 | Oct 2005 | US |
Child | 11715221 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10971598 | Oct 2004 | US |
Child | 11252916 | US | |
Parent | 10734514 | Dec 2003 | US |
Child | 10971598 | US |