Information
-
Patent Grant
-
6814302
-
Patent Number
6,814,302
-
Date Filed
Monday, April 29, 200222 years ago
-
Date Issued
Tuesday, November 9, 200420 years ago
-
Inventors
-
Original Assignees
-
Examiners
Agents
-
CPC
-
US Classifications
Field of Search
US
- 239 88
- 239 89
- 239 90
- 239 91
- 239 92
- 239 93
- 239 94
- 239 98
- 239 5332
- 239 5333
- 239 5338
- 239 5339
- 239 5851
- 239 5852
- 239 5853
- 239 5854
- 239 5855
- 251 12915
- 251 12921
-
International Classifications
- B05B300
- B05B130
- F02M4702
- F02M3900
-
Abstract
An injection device for a fuel reservoir injection system is proposed, having an injection nozzle (16), which protrudes into a combustion chamber and can be supplied with fuel from a high-pressure fuel distributor (10) by means of a high-pressure fuel supply path (14, 52, 44, 40), and having a nozzle needle (30), which opens and closes this injection nozzle (16) as a function of the pressure in a control chamber (58). In order to introduce fuel into the control chamber, an inlet conduit (62), which branches from the fuel supply path, feeds into this control chamber (58) and an outlet path (66, 78), which leads from this control chamber (58), permits fuel to flow out of the control chamber. A shutoff valve (70) can close a downstream section (66″) off from an upstream section (66′) of the outlet path. The downstream section and the upstream section of the outlet path feed into a valve chamber (78), which contains a movable shutoff element (76). A bypass conduit (74), which feeds into the outlet path, branches from the fuel supply path in order to introduce an additional fuel flow into the control chamber. In order to minimally interfere with the flow behavior in the outflow of fuel, the infeed point of the bypass conduit into the outlet path is disposed in the vicinity of the valve chamber
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The invention relates to an injection device for a fuel reservoir injection system of an internal combustion engine.
Injection devices of this kind are sufficiently known from current use. Fuel reservoir injection systems, common rail injection systems for a multi-cylinder internal combustion engine have a high-pressure fuel distributor or rail from which a number of high-pressure fuel supply paths each lead to a respective injection nozzle that protrudes into one of the cylinder combustion chambers of the internal combustion engine.
The fuel injection into the respective combustion chamber is controlled by means of a nozzle needle, which opens and closes the injection nozzle as a function of the pressure in a control chamber. In order to build up pressure in the control chamber, a continuously open inlet conduit is provided, through which the fuel at rail pressure can flow from the respective fuel supply path into the control chamber. Fuel can the released from the control chamber by means of a separate outlet path and can thus bring about a pressure relief in the control chamber. Through intentional opening and closing of a shutoff valve disposed in the outlet path, influence can be exerted on the pressure level in the control chamber and therefore on the position of the nozzle needle.
If the valve is opened, fuel flows out of the control chamber. The attendant pressure drop in the control chamber causes the nozzle needle to lift up from a seat in the injection nozzle and fuel comes out of the injection nozzle. If the valve is closed again, the replenishing flow of fuel arriving via the inlet conduit causes the pressure in the control chamber to build back up again. As a result of this pressure increase, the nozzle needle is pressed against its seat again and closes the injection nozzle. The outlet path and the inlet conduit are embodied so that when the outlet path is open, the flow rate of the fuel flowing out via the outlet path is greater than the flow rate of the replenishing fuel arriving via the inlet conduit, effectively reducing the fuel volume in the control chamber.
The metering precision of the injected fuel quantity is essentially determined by the speed with which the injection nozzle can be opened and closed. In the closing of the nozzle, the comparatively small flow cross section of the inlet conduit can mean that there is not enough of a replenishing fuel flow to achieve sufficiently rapid closing times.
In order nevertheless to be able to compensate for the fuel losses sustained in the control chamber with sufficient speed, one strategy is to provide a bypass conduit that branches from the fuel supply path and feeds into the outlet path. If the shutoff valve is closed, an additional fuel flow can flow through this bypass conduit, out of the fuel supply path and into the control chamber by means of a part of the outlet path in the vicinity of the control chamber. It has turned out that this permits higher closing speeds of the nozzle needle to be achieved.
However, it has also turned out that the feeding of the bypass conduit into the outlet path can cause interference in the flow behavior of the fuel as it flows out of the control chamber. For example, inevitable flow edges at the infeed point can cause turbulence which end ups preventing the fuel quantity required to open the injection nozzle from flowing out of the control chamber with the desired speed. The delayed opening of the injection nozzle can then have disadvantageous effects on the metering precision.
SUMMARY
According to the invention, the infeed point of the bypass conduit is disposed in the outlet path in the vicinity of the valve chamber. It has turned out that by locating the infeed point here, undesirable interference of the flow behavior of the fuel flowing out of the control chamber can be kept very slight. Since intensified turbulence of the fuel flow must as a rule be reckoned with anyway in the vicinity of the valve chamber, the additional turbulence effect of the flow edges of the infeed point is insignificant by comparison with this other turbulence.
If the bypass conduit is open, provided that there is a pressure difference, fuel flows from the fuel supply path, via the bypass conduit, into the outlet path, and increases the pressure there. Whereas this effect is desirable during the closing of the injection valve in order to fill the control chamber more rapidly, during the opening of the injection valve, the fuel flow being diverted into the outlet path via the bypass conduit can partially hinder the outflow of fuel from the control chamber to a significant degree and can thus lead to a delayed opening of the injection nozzle. The bypass conduit infeed point location according to the invention has also turned out to be advantageous in this regard.
In the vicinity of the valve chamber, there is sufficient freedom of structural design to permit the bypass conduit to feed into the outlet path so that such hindrances to the outflow of fuel can be kept to a minimum. The bypass conduit can therefore easily remain open all the time.
As a rule, an outlet throttle can be disposed in the outlet path, upstream of the valve chamber, and this outlet throttle can be used to set a desired flow of the outflowing fuel. This outlet throttle is preferably spaced apart from the valve chamber along the outlet path.
It is turned out that the embodiment of the region of the outlet path between the outlet throttle and the valve chamber can be of decisive importance to the flow behavior of the outflowing fuel. In particular, through suitable embodiment of his region of the outlet path, cavitation can be produced in the outlet throttle when fuel flows out of the control chamber. Cavitation in the outlet throttle has the advantage that the flow through the outlet throttle is independent of the pressure in the valve chamber and therefore independent of a possible fuel influx via the bypass conduit.
Since according to the invention, the bypass conduit feeds into the valve chamber and the region of the outlet path between the outlet throttle and the valve chamber is consequently free of flow edges, which can be produced by the infeed of the bypass conduit, this region of the outlet path can be more easily optimized design-wise with regard to a desired flow behavior in the fuel outflow than would be the case if the bypass conduit were to feed into the outlet path between the outlet throttle and the valve chamber.
A preferred embodiment of the invention provides that the shutoff element be embodied as a seat element that can be moved in the valve chamber between two opposing valve seats, that the upstream and the downstream sections of the outlet path feed into the valve chamber at the two valve seats, and that the infeed point of the bypass conduit into the valve chamber—with regard to the outflow direction of the fuel—is disposed between the two valve seats.
It goes without saying, though, that an embodiment of the shutoff valve as a piston slide valve or as a single-seat valve is in no way excluded from the scope of the invention.
Other advantages and advantageous embodiments of the subject of the invention can be inferred from the specification, the drawings, and the claims.
An exemplary embodiment of the invention will be explained in detail below in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1
shows a schematic, longitudinal section through a detail of an injector assembly of a reservoir injection system, and
FIG. 2
schematically depicts a quantity characteristic field of the injector assembly according to FIG.
1
.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
FIG. 1
shows a pressure source
10
of a reservoir injection system that represents a common rail injection system, which supplies diesel fuel at a high pressure of for example more than 1500 bar into a distributor tube or rail
12
. A number of fuel supply lines
14
lead from the distributor tube
12
and are each used to supply fuel to a respective injection nozzle
16
. The injection nozzle
16
protrudes in a manner not shown in detail into a cylinder combustion chamber of a multi-cylinder internal combustion engine, for example an engine of a motor vehicle. It is part of an injector assembly, labeled as a whole with the numeral
18
, which as a unit that can be preassembled, can be inserted into a cylinder block of the internal combustion engine.
The injector assembly
18
has a housing assembly
20
with a nozzle housing
22
and a valve housing
24
. A guide bore
28
is embodied in the nozzle housing
22
, extending along a housing axis
26
, and an elongated nozzle needle
30
is guided so that it can move axially in this guide bore
28
. At a needle tip
32
, the nozzle needle
30
has a closing face
34
with which it can be brought into sealed contact against a needle seat
36
embodied in the nozzle housing
22
.
When the nozzle needle
30
is resting against the needle seat
36
, i.e. is disposed in the needle closed position, this stops fuel from coming out of a nozzle opening arrangement
38
at the end of the nozzle housing
22
protruding into the combustion chamber. However, if the needle is lifted up from the needle seat
36
, i.e. is disposed in the needle open position, fuel can flow from an annular chamber
40
, which is formed between the nozzle needle
30
and the circumference wall of the guide bore
28
, past the needle seat
36
, to the nozzle opening arrangement
38
and from there, can be injected into the combustion chamber essentially at the high pressure or rail pressure.
The nozzle needle
30
is prestressed in the direction of its closed position by means of a prestressing spring
42
. The prestressing spring
42
is accommodated in a spring chamber
44
embodied in the nozzle housing
22
. At one end, this spring is supported against the housing assembly
20
by means of a sleeve
46
that contains the end of the nozzle needle
30
remote from the combustion chamber in a sealed, but axially mobile fashion and bites into the valve housing
24
with a biting edge, and at the other end, the spring is supported against the nozzle needle
30
by means of a spring plate
48
that is slid onto the nozzle needle
30
. The spring plate
48
is supported against a retaining ring
50
inserted into a circumferential groove of the nozzle needle
30
.
The spring chamber
44
is fed by a bore
52
, which is embodied in the housing assembly
20
and into which fuel is introduced, essentially at the rail pressure, via the associated fuel supply line
14
. From the spring chamber
44
, the fuel travels via the annular chamber
40
into the vicinity of the needle seat
36
. In axial regions in which the nozzle needle
30
rests against the circumference wall of the guide bore
28
for guidance purposes, the fuel flows past one or more flattenings
54
of the nozzle needle circumference.
A control chamber
58
, which is fed by an inlet conduit
62
equipped with an inlet throttle
60
, is defined by the sleeve
46
, the valve housing
24
, and an end face
56
of the nozzle needle
30
remote from the combustion chamber. Fuel can flow from the spring chamber
44
, through the inlet conduit
62
, and into the control chamber
58
. By means of an outlet conduit
66
equipped with an outlet throttle
64
, fuel can flow from the control chamber
58
to a relief chamber that is not shown in detail.
A shutoff valve
70
, which can be actuated by means of an electromagnetic or preferably piezoelectric actuator
68
that is only indicated schematically, makes it possible for the outflow of fuel to the relief chamber to be shut off.
Because of the prestressing spring
42
and the pressure, which prevails in the control chamber
58
, acting on the needle end face
56
, an axial closing force directed toward the combustion chamber is exerted on the nozzle needle
30
. This closing force axially counteracts an opening force, which is exerted on the nozzle needle
30
due to the action of the pressure prevailing in the spring chamber
44
and the annular chamber
40
on a stepped surface
72
embodied on the nozzle needle
30
. If the shutoff valve
70
is disposed in a closed position and if the outflow of fuel through the outlet conduit
66
is consequently shut off, then in the stationery state, the closing force is greater than the opening force, as a result of which the nozzle needle
30
then assumes its closed position. If the shutoff valve
70
is then opened, fuel flows out of the control chamber
58
.
The flow cross sections of the inlet throttle
60
and the outlet throttle
64
are matched to each other so that the inflow through the inlet conduit
62
is weaker than the outflow through the outlet conduit
66
and therefore results in a net outflow of fuel. The subsequent pressure drop in the control chamber
58
causes the closing force to drop below the opening force and the nozzle needle
30
lifts up from the needle seat
36
.
If the injection is to be terminated, the shutoff valve
70
is brought back into a closed position. This stops the outflow of fuel through the outlet conduit
64
. Fuel continues to flow from the spring chamber
44
into the control chamber
58
by means of the inlet conduit
62
, as a result of which the pressure in the control chamber
58
builds up again. As soon as the pressure in the control chamber
58
reaches a level at which the closing force is greater than the opening force, the nozzle
30
moves into its closed position which prevents fuel from flowing out of the nozzle opening arrangement
38
.
In order to achieve rapid needle closing speeds, a rapid pressure increase in the control chamber
58
must be provided after the shutoff valve
70
closes. The flow through the inlet conduit
62
is comparatively slight. An increase of the flow cross section of the inlet throttle
60
, however, can only be considered within very strict limits because otherwise, there is the danger that when the shutoff valve
70
is opened, the net outflow of fuel is no longer sufficient to open the nozzle needle
30
.
A bypass conduit
74
is therefore provided, by means of which an additional inflow of fuel into the control chamber
58
can be produced. The bypass conduit
74
branches from the bore
52
or from the spring chamber
44
and, just like the inlet conduit
62
, is supplied with fuel that is essentially at the rail pressure.
The additional inflow of fuel through the bypass conduit
74
permits the pressure in the control chamber
58
to build back up to the level that is required to switch the nozzle needle
30
over from its open position into its closed position more rapidly than when the control chamber
58
is filled solely by means of the inlet conduit
62
. In the final analysis, this allows the fuel quantity injected into combustion chamber to be more finely metered. This is clearly shown by the schematically quantity characteristic field depicted in FIG.
2
.
In
FIG. 2
, the abscissa is used to plot the time period t, during which the actuator
68
is electrically triggered in order to keep the valve
70
open. The ordinate indicates the fuel quantity M injected. The solid line L
1
represents the relationship between triggering time and injection quantity when a bypass conduit
74
is provided, while the dashed line L
2
shows this relationship when no bypass conduit is provided.
It is clear that the characteristic curve L
1
is flatter than the characteristic curve L
2
. This means that with the same triggering time, less fuel comes out of the injection nozzle
16
when the bypass conduit
74
is provided. The reason for this is that after the power supply to the actuator
68
is shut off and after the valve
70
is closed, the nozzle needle
30
takes longer to return from its open position to its closed position when no bypass conduit
74
is provided than is the case when an additional fuel flow through the bypass conduit
74
accelerates the closing of the needle.
After the valve
70
is closed, the injection nozzle
16
is consequently open for a longer time when a bypass conduit
74
is not provided than when a bypass conduit
74
is provided. Correspondingly, the total output of fuel is also greater when no bypass conduit
74
is provided. The flatter characteristic curve L
1
when a bypass conduit
74
is provided permits a finer metering of the fuel quantity injected and thus, results in an injector that is less tolerance-critical on the whole.
In the exemplary embodiment shown here, the shutoff valve
70
is embodied as a so-called double-switching directional control valve whose shutoff element
76
—in this instance a spherical seat element—can be moved by the actuator
68
, between two end positions and at least one intermediary position in a valve chamber
78
.
In the two end positions or valve closing positions, the outlet conduit
66
is closed, preventing fuel from flowing out of the control chamber
58
. By contrast, in the at least one intermediary position or valve opening position, it is open, permitting fuel to flow out of the control chamber
58
.
This embodiment of the valve
70
makes it easy to produce a preinjection phase and a main injection phase. For the preinjection, the shutoff element
76
from a first one of the end positions into the second; for the main injection, it is moved from the second end position back into the first. The time during which the shutoff element
76
stops between the two end positions determines the fuel quantity injected for the preinjection and main injection. In particular, for the preinjection, the shutoff element
76
can be moved from the first end position into the second rapidly, i.e. without a long intermediary stop, so that only a small amount of fuel is injected. For the main injection, the shutoff element
76
can be kept in the intermediary position for a certain amount of time in order to permit a correspondingly greater quantity of fuel to come out.
It goes without saying that the actuator
68
for this must be designed as a positioning actuator, which also permits the shutoff element
76
to be moved into the at least one intermediary position.
The valve chamber
78
constitutes a flow connection between and upstream part
66
′—with regard to the outlet direction of the fuel—and a downstream part
66
″ of the outlet conduit
66
. A first valve seat
80
for the shutoff element
76
, which is embodied as a spherical or flat seat element, is embodied at the infeed point of the downstream part
66
″ into the valve chamber
78
; a second valve seat
82
is embodied in at the infeed point of the upstream part
66
′. The contact of the shutoff element
76
against the first valve seat
80
defines the first of the two above-mentioned end positions; the contact against the second valve seat
82
defines the second end position. The shutoff element
76
can be spring-loaded into the first end position in a manner that is not shown in detail.
The bypass conduit
74
likewise feeds into the valve chamber
78
. The embodiment of the valve
70
with two opposing valve seats
80
,
82
then results in the fact that in the first end position of the shutoff element
76
, i.e. in contact against the first valve seat
80
, a fuel flow that accelerates the filling of the control chamber
58
can flow through the bypass conduit
74
into the upstream part
66
′ of the outlet conduit
66
.
In the second end position, however, there can be no such flow of fuel. The entry into the upstream part
66
′ up of the outlet conduit
66
is closed by the contact of the shutoff element
76
against the second valve seat
82
. However, this is not necessarily problematic because if the shutoff element
76
assumes the second end position only after preinjections, then the inflow of fuel solely via the inlet conduit
62
can be enough to compensate for the fuel losses from the pressure chamber
58
with sufficient speed. Namely, as a rule, only small fuel quantities flow out of the control chamber during a preinjection. These can be rapidly replaced even without the aid of the bypass conduit
74
.
The outlet conduit
66
is embodied so that the fuel flowing out of the control chamber
58
cavitates in the outlet throttle
64
. This has the advantage that the outflow of fuel is independent of the pressure prevailing in the valve chamber
78
and therefore is also unimpaired by a pressure increase in the valve chamber
78
that can occur with an open valve
70
as a result of the inflow of fuel via the bypass conduit
74
.
The embodiment of the outlet throttle
64
itself is not the only thing responsible for the occurrence of cavitation. The downstream conduit section directly adjoining the outlet throttle
64
also significantly influences the occurrence of cavitation. Therefore, the outlet throttle
64
here is not disposed directly upstream of the valve chamber
78
, but spaced apart from it. Between the outlet throttle
64
and the valve chamber
78
, a so-called diffuser
84
is provided, which causes the cavitation to occur in the outlet throttle
64
. If the bypass conduit
74
were to feed into the diffuser
84
, flow edges at the infeed point would interfere with the occurrence of cavitation, if not completely preventing it. However, because the bypass conduit
74
feeds into the valve chamber
78
spaced apart from the diffuser
84
, such interference with the cavitation production can be avoided.
The infeed angle at which the bypass conduit
74
feeds into the valve chamber
78
can also influence the outflow behavior of the fuel. In particular, an acute infeed angle of the bypass conduit
74
with regard to the outflow direction of the fuel can produce favorable results.
The bypass conduit
74
also contains a bypass throttle
86
, whose embodiment is designed on the one hand, to permit the greatest possible inflow of fuel to the control chamber
58
and on the other hand, to permit the least possible leakage flows, which escape unused via the downstream part
66
″ of the outlet conduit
66
when the valve
70
is open or the shutoff element
76
is resting against the valve seat
82
.
Claims
- 1. An injection device for a fuel reservoir injection system of an internal combustion engine, having an injection nozzle (16), which protrudes into a combustion chamber of the engine and can be supplied with fuel from a high-pressure fuel distributor (10) of the reservoir injection system by means of a high-pressure fuel supply path (14, 52,44, 40), and having a nozzle needle (30), which opens and closes the injection nozzle (16) as a function of the pressure in a control chamber (58), where in order to introduce fuel into the control chamber (58), an inlet conduit (62), which branches from the fuel supply path (14, 52, 44, 40), feeds into the control chamber (58) and an outlet path (66, 78), which leads from the control chamber (58), permits fuel to flow out of the control chamber (58), where a shutoff valve (70) is also provided, which can close a downstream section (66″) of the outlet path (66, 78)—with regard to the outlet direction of the fuel—off from an upstream section (66′) of the outlet path (66, 78), where the downstream section (66″) and the upstream section (66′) of the outlet path (66, 78) feed into a valve chamber (78), which contains a movable shutoff element (76) of the shutoff valve (70), and where a bypass conduit (74), which feeds into the outlet path (66, 78), branches from the fuel supply path (14, 52, 44, 40) in order to introduce an additional fuel flow into the control chamber (58), characterized in that the infeed point of the bypass conduit (74) into the outlet path (66, 78) is disposed in the vicinity of the valve chamber (78), the shutoff element (76) is embodied as a seat element that can be moved between two opposing valve seats (80, 82) in the valve chamber (78), the upstream section (66′) and the downstream section (66″) of the outlet path (66, 78) feed into the valve chamber (78) at the two valve seats (80, 82), and in that the infeed point of the bypass conduit (74) into the valve chamber (78)—with regard to the outflow direction of the fuel—is disposed between the two valve seats (80, 82).
- 2. The injection device according to claim 1, characterized in that an outlet throttle (64) disposed in the outlet path (66, 78) upstream of the valve chamber (78) is disposed spaced apart from the valve chamber (78) along the outlet path (66, 78).
- 3. The injection device according to claim 2, characterized in that the outlet path (68, 78), particularly in its region (84) between the outlet throttle (64) and the valve chamber (78), is embodied in such a way that when fuel flows out of the control chamber (58), cavitation occurs in the outlet throttle (64).
- 4. The injection device according to claim 1, characterized in that the bypass conduit (74) is always open.
- 5. The injection device according to claim 1, characterized in that the shutoff valve (70) is piezoelectrically actuated.
- 6. The injection device according to claim 1, characterized by means of its use as a component of a common rail injector.
Priority Claims (1)
Number |
Date |
Country |
Kind |
100 24 702 |
May 2000 |
DE |
|
PCT Information
Filing Document |
Filing Date |
Country |
Kind |
PCT/DE01/01159 |
|
WO |
00 |
Publishing Document |
Publishing Date |
Country |
Kind |
WO01/88366 |
11/22/2001 |
WO |
A |
US Referenced Citations (3)
Number |
Name |
Date |
Kind |
4605166 |
Kelly |
Aug 1986 |
A |
5484104 |
Kukler |
Jan 1996 |
A |
6412706 |
Guerrassi et al. |
Jul 2002 |
B1 |
Foreign Referenced Citations (3)
Number |
Date |
Country |
198 37 890 |
Feb 2000 |
DE |
2 336 627 |
Oct 1999 |
GB |
2 340 610 |
Feb 2000 |
GB |