The present invention relates to improvements in and to the control of brushless DC (BLDC) motors.
BLDC motors typically comprise a magnetic rotor and one or more stator phases each comprising at least one coil winding. The rotor is driven by applying a suitable driving current waveform to one or more phases. In order to synchronise the applied current with rotor position and thus ensure efficient motor operation, one phase is left floating (undriven) so that the back EMF generated by rotor rotation can be monitored.
Often the phases are driven by a PWM (pulse width modulation) waveform, usually comprising a square wave having alternate forward (or ON) pulses and null pulses. If the phases are driven using a PWM waveform the BEMF voltage on the floating phase is disturbed by ringing oscillations caused by RLC components of the motor phase in response to the rising (or falling) edge of the PWM modulation. As such, the rotor position can be estimated les accurately and thus efficient operation is impaired.
It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide a solution that at least partially overcomes or alleviates the above problem.
In accordance with a first aspect of the present invention there is provided a method of monitoring the back EMF in a floating phase of a BLDC motor, the other phases being driven by a PWM waveform comprising a series of on pulses of a first polarity interspersed with zero signal periods, the method comprising: inserting a reverse pulse prior to a scheduled PWM on pulse, the reverse pulse having a duration of less than the subsequent PWM on pulse; and monitoring the back EMF during the final portion of the PWM on pulse.
The effect of the reverse pulse and the monitoring of the back EMF during the final part of the PWM on pulse is to reduce the effect of ringing oscillations and thus improve the accuracy of rotor position detection using Back EMF monitoring.
The reverse pulse may be a pulse of reverse polarity to the on pulse applied to the same stator phase as the on pulse or the reverse pulse may be a pulse applied to another stator phase. If the pulse is applied to another phase it is a pulse of a polarity such that it drives the motor in a direction opposite to the direction in which the motor is driven by the on pulse.
The on pulse subsequent to a reverse pulse may be of extended duration. Preferably the on pulse may be extended by a period equal to the duration of the reverse polarity pulse. This can maintain an effective PWM current equivalent to the desired PWM duty cycle value despite the extended on period. Preferably, back EMF monitoring is carried out during the extended portion of an extended duration on pulse. This can be achieved by use of a delay circuit or counter initiated at the same time as the on pulse to control the monitoring.
The method may be applied at all PWM duty cycles. Alternatively, the method may only be applied during selected PWM duty cycles. In particular the method may be applied at PWM duty cycles below a threshold value. The threshold may be selected by consideration of the ringing settling time in the motor and in particular may be applied to PWM duty cycles where the duration of the on pulse is less than the ringing settling time. In such embodiments, the extended on pulse duration may be defined as a preset minimum duration by consideration of the ringing settling time and the requisite reverse pulse duration may be defined as the difference between the preset minimum duration and the standard on pulse duration for a given PWM duty cycle value. In addition to reducing the ringing this may minimise effects due to non-zero current derivatives during the reverse pulse and thus reduce the need for increased or improved EMC filtering.
The reverse pulse may be applied before each on pulse or may be applied only before selected on pulses. The reverse pulse may be applied intermittently, for instance before every nth on pulse. Alternatively, the reverse pulse may be applied before on pulses only when a zero crossing of the back EMF is expected or on opposite sides of an expected zero crossing.
Back EMF monitoring may be carried out using a comparator to detect zero crossings. Additionally or alternatively, it may be carried out using a suitable analogue to digital converter. The back EMF signal may be low pass filtered or integration filtered before monitoring.
The motor may be a three phase BLDC motor.
In accordance with a second aspect of the present invention there is provided a brushless DC motor operable in accordance with the method of the first aspect of the present invention.
The motor of the second aspect of the present invention may incorporate any or all features of the first aspect of the present invention as are desired or as are appropriate.
In order that the present invention is more clearly understood, one embodiment will now be described, by way of example only and with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
During typical operation of a 3 phase BLDC motor, during periods of time, two of the phases are driven using a suitable driving waveform and the third phase is left floating. This allows the back EMF in the third phase to be monitored for the purpose of determining rotor position. Typically this is achieved by monitoring the back EMF signal for zero crossing or by sampling the back EMF signal using an analogue to digital converter and interpolating the sampled signal to determine a zero crossing point.
In many instances, the motor is driven by use of a PWM waveform. To achieve this in a typical configuration, a PWM square wave voltage signal is applied to one of the driven phases and the other driven phase is connected thereto but no driving signal is applied. This results in an average current of a desired value flowing through both linked phases. This is illustrated in
In order to reduce this ringing, in the present invention, a reverse pulse is applied prior to a PWM on pulse. This is illustrated in
The skilled man will appreciate that in alternative embodiments, it is possible for the reverse pulse to be a pulse of opposite polarity to the on pulse applied to the same driving coil as the on pulse.
In order to maintain a desired average current in accordance with the preset PWM duty cycle, the duration of the PWM on pulse is extended by a period equal to the duration of the reverse pulse. As a result, the ringing on the back EMF signal has decayed before the end of the PWM on pulse and thus an accurate back EMF signal value can be obtained during the latter part of the PWM on pulse, as is illustrated at 2.
Whilst in a simple implementation, the reverse pulse may be applied before every on pulse, in a more sophisticated implementation, the reverse pulse is only applied intermittently. Typically, in such implementations back EMF monitoring only takes place subsequent to application of the reverse pulse. For example, a reverse pulse may be applied either side of an expected zero crossing such that the position of the zero crossing can be interpolated by sampling the back EMF signal subsequent to both reverse pulses. In a three phase motor, this can reduce the necessity for reverse pulses to two in every 60° of rotation.
In other implementations, the above method may only be applied if the ringing decay time is of the order of or greater than the PWM on pulse duration. Outside such circumstances the ringing has a less significant effect on the measured back EMF signal. An example of how this determination may be carried out is set out below for a PWM switching frequency of 20 kHz (hence a PWM cycle period of 50 us) and an assumed ringing decay period of 17 us. In such circumstances a duty cycle value of 34% results in a PWM on pulse duration of 17 us.
If target_effective_PWM_duty_cycle is the PWM duty cycle value needed in order to run the motor at a desired operating point. Then the following PWM modulation is applied:
However:
It is of course to be understood that the present invention is not to be limited to the details of the above embodiment which is described by way of example only.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0815672.1 | Aug 2008 | GB | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/IB2009/006650 | 8/26/2009 | WO | 00 | 6/1/2011 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2010/023538 | 3/4/2010 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4746844 | MacKelvie et al. | May 1988 | A |
4772839 | MacMinn et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4928043 | Plunkett | May 1990 | A |
4992710 | Cassat | Feb 1991 | A |
5001405 | Cassat | Mar 1991 | A |
5097190 | Lyons et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5134349 | Kruse | Jul 1992 | A |
5144209 | Inaji et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5191269 | Carbolante | Mar 1993 | A |
5191270 | Mccormack | Mar 1993 | A |
5384527 | Rozman et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5473240 | Moreira | Dec 1995 | A |
5517095 | Carobolante et al. | May 1996 | A |
5525874 | Mallarapu et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5796235 | Schrodl et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5859512 | Burhker | Jan 1999 | A |
5859520 | Bourgeois et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
6011368 | Kalpathi et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
RE36568 | Horst | Feb 2000 | E |
6023141 | Chalupa | Feb 2000 | A |
6034493 | Boyd et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6072289 | Li | Jun 2000 | A |
6081091 | Mitchell et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6107772 | Liu et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6124689 | Kardash | Sep 2000 | A |
6163120 | Menegoli | Dec 2000 | A |
6531843 | Iwaji et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6583593 | Iijima et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6661192 | Copeland | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6795268 | Ryan | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6825646 | Colombo | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6885163 | Heidrich | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6979970 | Iwanaga et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6995530 | Biamonte et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7138776 | Gauthier et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7141949 | Harwood | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7166980 | LeGrand | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7180262 | Consoli et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7202618 | Ide et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7245104 | Tomigashi et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
8030867 | Allison, III | Oct 2011 | B1 |
8063591 | Yamamoto | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8203296 | Hristov | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8212508 | Paintz et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8456117 | Paintz | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8461789 | Paintz et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
20010048278 | Young et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20040056627 | Grasso et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040075407 | Ohiwa et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040263104 | Iwanaga et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050146296 | Klemm et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20100141192 | Paintz et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0892489 | Jan 1999 | EP |
1478086 | Nov 2004 | EP |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report issued Feb. 23, 2007 for PCT/IB/2006/002430 with an International Filing Date of Sep. 4, 2006 [corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 12/065,598]. |
Schmidt, et al. “Initial Rotor Angle Detection of a Non-Salient Pole Permanent Magnet Synchronous Machine,” IEEE Industry Society, Annual Meeting, New Orleans, Louisiana (Oct. 5-9, 1997). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110221371 A1 | Sep 2011 | US |