The present application is related to two Korean patent applications by the applicant as follows and claims priority:
1) Application number: 10-2021-0021814 (DAS code: 5456)
2) Application number: 20-2021-0000750 (DAS code: C145)
This specification is a translated version of the said applications combined and rewritten to enhance clarity and details.
References searched by the applicant are:
Patent number: U.S. Pat. No. 10,168,412 B2 (Jan. 1, 2019)
Patent number: U.S. Pat. No. 8,895,836 B2 (Nov. 25, 2014)
Patent number: U.S. Pat. No. 4,172,739 (Oct. 30, 1979)
Non-patent: Singh, R., Kumar, S., Gehlot, A., and Pachauri, R., An Imperative Role of Sun Trackers in Photovoltaic Technology: A Review, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 82(2018) 3263-3278.
The present disclosure relates to an apparatus capable of accurately tracking the sun concerning solar power generation using two degrees of freedom independent of each other.
Among existing solar power generation systems are devices that fix in one posture, adjust only one axis for rotation, or control two axes for solar tracking. However, the two degrees of freedom adopted in most two-axis sun trackers are not independent. In this case, two drive motors operate at the same burden, and the control method is complicated, usually using sensors. Also, solar panels of most of the existing dual-axis devices are supported at one point, and so the structural weight increases to design against stress concentration and disturbances such as wind. Despite the complexity and price of such devices and controls, two-axis solar power generation devices are getting preferred considering their high efficiency and overall performance.
The purpose of this disclosure is to provide solar tracking devices, which can be simply controlled without sensors to accurately follow the sun while keeping robustness and stability against disturbances such as wind.
The present invention utilizes a principle to achieve accurate solar tracking by using a simple control method. The tracking device by this principle will have two axes of rotation: the first rotation axis which is the daily rotation axis is installed on a ground structure at the site of solar power generation, parallel to the axis of the earth's rotation, which is the same direction to the Polar Star, and the second rotation axis which is an elevation angle axis is mounted on the frame of the first rotation axis such that it is perpendicular to the first rotation axis. Then the said principle says that the two rotational degrees of freedom are independent of each other. That is, any daily rotation about the first rotation axis does not influence the elevation angle about the second rotation axis. This property brings in an advantage in control and economic operation. The essential conditions of the principle are that the first rotation axis is fixed on the earth and parallel to the axis of the earth's rotation, and the second axis is installed on the frame of the first axis and perpendicular to the first axis.
Among the devices of dual-axis systems of prior arts, either the first axis is vertically installed on the earth's surface, or instead of the axis of daily rotation, the axis for the elevation angle is fixed on the earth's surface. Thus, most sun trackers of prior arts do not allow independent control and any control methods for the coupled DOF (Degree of Freedom) become complex.
Since the said principle is unknown or not explicitly identified in the literature, this principle is to be called here the “Principle of Exact Sun-following by Independent 2-DOF.” Although this principle may be proven by using some complex spherical geometry, this can be explained simply as follows. Consider a time say solar noon when the sun reaches the solar culmination, and a solar panel of the present invention is set perpendicular to the sunlight. One hour later the earth rotates by 15 degrees toward the east and then the solar panel rotates by the same 15 degrees with the earth. Now let the solar panel rotate by the same amount toward the west around the first rotation axis, which is parallel to the axis of earth's rotation, then the solar panel looks at the sun exactly as one hour ago. That is, even though the earth rotates toward the east, the solar panel keeps perpendicular to the sun if the solar panel is rotated back toward the west by the same amount of earth's rotation, which is the daily rotation. Since the elevation angle of the solar panel is not influenced by the daily rotation, the said elevation angle can be controlled independently of the daily rotation.
The range of elevation angle is 46.9 degrees, that is, from −23.45 at the winter solstice to 23.45 at the summer solstice. This range is covered by the elevation angle axis in 6 months, which is a very slow motion. It is very reasonable to adjust the elevation angle intermittently, for example once every month at the time of a regular maintenance. In this case, the irradiation energy loss, the so-called cosine effect, is about 0.23% compared with the maximum irradiation energy at a perpendicular incident angle.
The range of rotation around the daily rotation axis is from dawn to sunset. If the daily rotation angle is adjusted every 30 minutes on the hour to the sun position corresponding to the time 15 minutes after the adjustment time, the irradiation energy loss is about 0.22%. This is an intermittent open-loop control with a forward half-step setting and reduces the loss of efficiency to about one-fourth as compared to an on-time setting. As an illustrative embodiment, it is reasonably sufficient to set a daily rotation from 5 hours before noon to 5 hours afternoon depending on the location.
The basic mechanism of devices realizing the principle of exact sun-following takes a form of a 2-axis gimbal. The rotation axis of the outer gimbal corresponds to the daily rotation axis installed parallel to the earth's axis and the inner gimbal axis to the elevation angle axis. Four preferred embodiments are disclosed: A long shaft type, a tip-tilt type, a tension structure type, and an array form. The daily rotation axis of the long shaft type has a distance between its bearings supported by two distinct poles or columns. If the distance is small such that the two poles merge in one pole, then a tip-tilt type is obtained. Accordingly, the solar panel with its mounting frame is supported at one point. The structural shape of this type tends to be overly weighted and vulnerable to external disturbances such as wind, compared to other types. A supporting structure for a solar panel can be designed better with multiple supports than with single support in terms of lightweight.
One embodiment of a driving mechanism for the daily rotation axes of the long shaft type and the tension structural type is to use a wire loop and a linear actuator such as a worm-gear motor. This embodiment of the said driving mechanism is simple and increases stability and robustness against disturbances such as wind, unbalanced weight, and so on.
Desirable embodiments of the present invention are described using
The solar panel frame 6 is mounted on the daily rotating frame 3 by an elevation angle hinge 4 and one or more length adjusting device 5. The elevation angle hinge 4 is perpendicular to the daily rotation axis. A length adjusting device 5 has two hinges or spherical joints at its ends: one attached on the daily rotating frame 3 and the other on the solar panel frame 6. More than two length adjusting devices 5 may be installed to support the solar panel frame 6. Multi-point support is very advantageous in terms of lightweight structural design compared to single-point support as in a tip-tilt type. This may be intuitively seen by considering load shares for single-point support and multi-point support. An optimum structural design, which is a desirable practice for real applications, will show this also. The elevation angle can be adjusted manually with little loss of efficiency as explained in the previous section. It is obvious that it can be controlled by a motor or a solenoid installed within the length adjusting device. Also, the driving power in this latter case is less than that for directly actuating a shaft by a motor as required in a tip-tilt type, due to a leveraging effect of the distance between the elevation angle hinge 4 and the length adjusting device 5.
A wire loop mechanism of a crossed wire layout like the one illustrated for the long shaft type in
A solar panel frame 91 is supported by hinges 88 and 89 that are installed on the south side of the daily rotating frame 83 and a length adjusting device 90 that is installed on the north side of the daily rotating frame 83. The length adjusting device 90 may be actuated by a motor or a solenoid, but as explained earlier this can be adjusted manually say once a month using a linear indexing mechanism. Since the solar panel frame 91 has a range of movement of ±23.45° its installation must secure appropriate space to avoid any interference with neighboring parts. This means that the hinges 88 and 89 need to be installed with some height from the daily rotating frame 83.
In case of a harsh environment with dust, a vibrator 95 may be installed in an appropriate place on the solar panel frame or the daily rotation frame and actuated to remove dust on the solar panel. The flexibility of ropes allows maximum use of the vibrating power for dusting.
The elevation angle of the solar panel frame 106 can be adjusted by a drive wheel 109 mounted perpendicularly underneath the solar panel frame. A wire loop 110 connects all the drive wheels in the said array and makes them move in unison by activating a position locking device 121. The drive wheels have a circular arc with a groove. The wire loop 110 has crossed wire layouts. This keeps the length of the wire loop constant regardless of the angular position of the drive wheels. With some other wire layouts, another device that can absorb looseness or tightness of the wire loop may be necessary.
The control of the daily rotation angle can be made in a similar way as illustrated for the long shaft type or the tip-tilt type using a wire loop. A crossed wire layout is shown in
It is obvious to easily connect an array of sun trackers of the type in
The wire loop actuating mechanisms illustrated as desirable embodiments in the present disclosure have several advantages over other actuator mechanisms in prior arts. In addition to connecting an array of solar trackers or solar panel frames and driving them simultaneously by one motor, the wire loop tightly holds moving parts of structures against wind or other disturbing loads, which enhances structural integrity such as stability and safety. Also, the worm-gear motor (WGM) adopted is self-locking and very suitable for intermittent control. This can be located at a convenient place without increasing dead load to the moving part of the structure.
In the description, a wire denotes an illustrative term and may mean rope, wire rope, string, etc. Other position control mechanisms such as a rack and pinion or a lead screw are also possible for similar purposes but maybe without self-locking capability.
For an intermittent open-loop control driving the devices of the present invention, a sequence of preset times is initialized and stored. When a preset time comes, a clock timer gives a signal to actuate a motor by a preset angle increment obtained from the number of intermittent steps. The sequence of the preset times is arranged referring to the solar noon time from the clock. It is noted that there are some differences between the solar noon from clock time and from sun time. The solar noon from sun time can be obtained from the equation of time and may well be utilized for the present intermittent control. However, since the maximum difference between the two times for solar noon is about 16 minutes in September, the clock time may well be used for a set of daily rotation angular positions that can be used year-round, because the maximum loss of irradiation efficiency is about 0.24%. It is also noted that the time difference is about 4 minutes from March to September when sunshine is relatively strong. For the intermittent control, presume a daily operation time from 7 am to 5 pm actuating intermittent controls on the hour, then at 7 am, the daily rotation angle is controlled to the earth's rotation angle corresponding to the clock time 7:30 am instead of 7:00 am. This forward half-step setting reduces the loss of efficiency to about one-fourth of that without forward setting and is a great advantage over the on-time setting.
After an intermittent control is completed, the motor is turned off until the next control time. After the last control step at 5 pm, a control step is taken to bring the daily rotating frame back to the daily rotation angle corresponding to the time 7:30 am.
Although specific layouts and means for practicing the present invention for a long shaft type, a tip-tilt type, a tension structure type, and an array sun tracker have been described herein and illustrated in the accompanying drawings, they are only for purposes of illustration and the scope of the invention is not limited thereby but is to be determined from the context of the concepts. Further, since numerous modifications and variations will readily occur to those skilled in the art, it is not desired to limit the invention to the exact construction and operation illustrated and described, and, accordingly, all suitable modifications and equivalents may resort to that fall within the scope of the invention.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10-2021-0021814 | Feb 2021 | KR | national |
20-2021-0000750 | Mar 2021 | KR | national |