Achromatic lenses and lenses having diffractive profiles with irregular width for vision treatment

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11844689
  • Patent Number
    11,844,689
  • Date Filed
    Friday, December 18, 2020
    3 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, December 19, 2023
    11 months ago
Abstract
Apparatuses, systems and methods for providing improved ophthalmic lenses, particularly intraocular lenses (IOLs), include features for providing improved extended depth of focus lenses. Exemplary ophthalmic lenses can include an optic including a diffractive profile including at least one set of echelettes, each echelette of the set having a different width in r-squared space than any other echelette of the set and the at least one set of echelettes repeating at least once upon the optic.
Description
BACKGROUND

Embodiments of the present disclosure relate to vision treatment techniques and in particular, to ophthalmic lenses such as, for example, contact lenses, corneal inlays or onlays, or intraocular lenses (IOLs) including, for example, phakic IOLs and piggyback IOLs (i.e. IOLs implanted in an eye already having an IOL).


Presbyopia is a condition that affects the accommodation properties of the eye. As objects move closer to a young, properly functioning eye, the effects of ciliary muscle contraction and zonular relaxation allow the lens of the eye to change shape, and thus increase its optical power and ability to focus at near distances. This accommodation can allow the eye to focus and refocus between near and far objects.


Presbyopia normally develops as a person ages and is associated with a natural progressive loss of accommodation. The presbyopic eye often loses the ability to rapidly and easily refocus on objects at varying distances. The effects of presbyopia usually become noticeable after the age of 45 years. By the age of 65 years, the crystalline lens has often lost almost all elastic properties and has only a limited ability to change shape.


Along with reductions in accommodation of the eye, age may also induce clouding of the lens due to the formation of a cataract. A cataract may form in the hard central nucleus of the lens, in the softer peripheral cortical portion of the lens, or at the back of the lens. Cataracts can be treated by the replacement of the cloudy natural lens with an artificial lens. An artificial lens replaces the natural lens in the eye, with the artificial lens often being referred to as an intraocular lens or “IOL.”


Monofocal IOLs are intended to provide vision correction at one distance only, usually the far focus. At the very least, since a monofocal IOL provides vision treatment at only one distance and since the typical correction is for far distance, spectacles are usually needed for good vision at near distances and sometimes for good vision at intermediate distances. The term “near vision” generally corresponds to vision provided when objects are at a distance from the subject eye at equal; or less than 1.5 feet. The term “distant vision” generally corresponds to vision provided when objects are at a distance of at least ab out 5-6 feet or greater. The term “intermediate vision” corresponds to vision provided when objects are at a distance of about 1.5 feet to about 5-6 feet from the subject eye. Such characterizations of near, intermediate, and far vision correspond to those addressed in Morlock R, Wirth R J, Tally S R, Garufis C, Heichel C W D, Patient-Reported Spectacle Independence Questionnaire (PRSIQ): Development and Validation. Am J Ophthalmology 2017; 178:101-114.


There have been various attempts to address limitations associated with monofocal IOLs. For example, multifocal IOLs have been proposed that deliver, in principle, two foci, one near and one far, optionally with some degree of intermediate focus. Such multifocal, or bifocal, IOLs are intended to provide good vision at two distances, and include both refractive and diffractive multifocal IOLs. In some instances, a multifocal IOL intended to correct vision at two distances may provide a near (add) power of about 3.0 or 4.0 diopters.


Multifocal IOLs may, for example, rely on a diffractive optical surface to direct portions of the light energy toward differing focal distances, thereby allowing the patient to clearly see both near and far objects. Multifocal ophthalmic lenses (including contact lenses or the like) have also been proposed for treatment of presbyopia without removal of the natural crystalline lens. Diffractive optical surfaces, either monofocal or multifocal, may also be configured to provide reduced chromatic aberration.


Diffractive monofocal and multifocal lenses can make use of a material having a given refractive index and a surface curvature which provide a refractive power. Diffractive lenses have a diffractive profile which confers the lens with a diffractive power that contributes to the overall optical power of the lens. The diffractive profile is typically characterized by a number of diffractive zones. When used for ophthalmic lenses these zones are typically annular lens zones, or echelettes, spaced aboutthe optical axis of the lens. Each echelette may be defined by an optical zone, a transition zone between the optical zone and an optical zone of an adjacent echelette, and an echelette geometry. The echelette geometry includes an inner and outer diameter and a shape or slope of the optical zone, a height or step height, and a shape of the transition zone. The surface area or diameter of the echelettes largely determines the diffractive power(s) of the lens and the step height of the transition between echelettes largely determines the light distribution between the different powers. Together, these echelettes form a diffractive profile.


A multifocal diffractive profile of the lens may be used to mitigate presbyopia by providing two or more optical powers; for example, one for near vision and one for far vision. The lenses may also take the form of an intraocular lens placed within the capsular bag of the eye, replacing the original lens, or placed in front of the natural crystalline lens. The lenses may also be in the form of a contact lens, most commonly a bifocal contact lens, or in any other form mentioned herein.


Although multifocal ophthalmic lenses lead to improved quality of vision for many patients, additional improvements would be beneficial. For example, some pseudophakic patients experience undesirable visual effects (dysphotopsia), e.g. glare or halos. Halos may arise when light from the unused focal image creates an out-of-focus image that is superimposed on the used focal image. For example, if light from a distant point source is imaged onto the retina by the distant focus of a bifocal IOL, the near focus of the IOL will simultaneously superimpose a defocused image on top of the image formed by the distant focus. This defocused image may manifest itself in the form of a ring of light surrounding the in-focus image, and is referred to as a halo. Another area of improvement revolves around the typical bifocality of multifocal lenses. While multifocal ophthalmic lenses typically provide adequate near and far vision, intermediate vision may be compromised.


A lens with an extended range of vision may thus provide certain patients the benefits of good vision at a range of distances, while having reduced or no dysphotopsia. Various techniques for extending the depth of focus of an IOL have been proposed. One technique is embodied in the Tecnis Symfony® lens offered by Johnson& Johnson Vision. One technique may include a bulls-eye refractive principle, and may involve a central zone with a slightly increased power. One technique may include an asphere or include refractive zones with different refractive zonal powers.


Although certain proposed treatments may provide some benefit to patients in need thereof, further advances would be desirable. For example, it would be desirable to provide improved IOL systems and methods that confer enhanced image quality across a wide and extended range of foci without dysphotopsia. Embodiments of the present disclosure provide solutions that may address the problems described above, and hence may provide answers to at least some of these outstanding needs.


BRIEF SUMMARY

Embodiments herein described include ophthalmic lenses including an optic. The optic may include a diffractive profile including at least one set of echelettes, each echelette of the set having a different width in r-squared space than any other echelette of the set and the at least one set of echelettes repeating at least once upon the optic.


Embodiments herein described include a method comprising fabricating an optic for an ophthalmic lens, the optic including a diffractive profile including at least one set of echelettes, each echelette of the set having a different width in r-squared space than any other echelette of the set and the at least one set of echelettes repeating at least once upon the optic.


Embodiments herein described include a system for fabricating an ophthalmic lens. The system may include a processor configured to determine a diffractive profile of an optic, the diffractive profile including at least one set of echelettes, each echelette ofthe set having a different width in r-squared space than any other echelette of the set and the at least one set of echelettes repeating at least once upon the optic. The system may include a manufacturing assembly that fabricates the optic based on the diffractive profile.


Embodiments herein described include ophthalmic lenses including an optic. The optic may include a diffractive profile including a plurality of echelettes, at least one echelette of the diffractive profile having a same width in r-squared space as another echelette of the diffractive profile, and at least one echelette of the diffractive profile having a different width in r-squared space than any other echelette of the diffractive profile.


Embodiments herein described include a method comprising fabricating an optic for an ophthalmic lens, the optic including a diffractive profile including a plurality of echelettes, at least one echelette of the diffractive profile having a same width in r-squared space as another echelette of the diffractive profile, and at least one echelette of the diffractive profile having a different width in r-squared space than any other echelette of the diffractive profile.


Embodiments herein described include a system for fabricating an ophthalmic lens. The system may include a processor configured to determine a diffractive profile of an optic, the diffractive profile including a plurality of echelettes, at least one echelette of the diffractive profile having a same width in r-squared space as another echelette of the diffractive profile, and at least one echelette of the diffractive profile having a different width in r-squared space than any other echelette of the diffractive profile. The system may include a manufacturing assembly that fabricates the optic based on the diffractive profile.


Embodiments herein described include ophthalmic lenses including an optic. The optic may include a diffractive profile including at least one echelette having a power and having a different width in r-squared space than another echelette of the diffractive profile, the at least one echelette being configured to distribute light to a distance focus.


The optic may include a refractive profile having a refractive zone with a width corresponding to the width of the at least one echelette and having a power that is negative or positive with respect to the power of the at least one echelette, the refractive zone configured to vary the distance focus of the at least one echelette.


Embodiments herein described include a method comprising fabricating an optic for an ophthalmic lens. The optic may include a diffractive profile including at least one echelette having a power and having a different width in r-squared space than another echelette of the diffractive profile, the at least one echelette being configured to distribute light to a distance focus.


The optic may include a refractive profile having a refractive zone with a width corresponding to the width of the at least one echelette and having a power that is negative or positive with respect to the power of the at least one echelette, the refractive zone configured to vary the distance focus of the at least one echelette.


Embodiments herein described include a system for fabricating an ophthalmic lens. The system may include a processor configured to determine a diffractive profile and a refractive profile of an optic, the diffractive profile including at least one echelette having a power and having a different width in r-squared space than another echelette of the diffractive profile, the at least one echelette being configured to distribute light to a distance focus, and the refractive profile having a refractive zone with a width corresponding to the width of the at least one echelette and having a power that is negative or positive with respect to the power of the at least one echelette, the refractive zone configured to vary the distance focus of the at least one echelette.


The system may include a manufacturing assembly that fabricates the optic based on the diffractive profile and the refractive profile.


Embodiments herein described include ophthalmic lenses including an optic. The optic including a diffractive profile including a plurality of echelettes, each echelette of the diffractive profile having a different width in r-squared space than any other echelette of the diffractive profile.


Embodiments herein described include a method comprising fabricating an optic for an ophthalmic lens, the optic including a diffractive profile including a plurality of echelettes, each echelette of the diffractive profile having a different width in r-squared space than any other echelette of the diffractive profile.


Embodiments herein described include a system for fabricating an ophthalmic lens. The system may include a processor configured to determine a diffractive profile of an optic, the diffractive profile including a plurality of echelettes, each echelette of the diffractive profile having a different width in r-squared space than any other echelette of the diffractive profile. The system may include a manufacturing assembly that fabricates the optic based on the diffractive profile.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1A illustrates a cross-sectional view of an eye with an implanted multifocal refractive intraocular lens.



FIG. 1B illustrates a cross-sectional view of an eye having an implanted multifocal diffractive intraocular lens.



FIG. 2A illustrates a front view of a diffractive multifocal intraocular lens.



FIG. 2B illustrates a cross-sectional view of a diffractive multifocal intraocular lens.



FIGS. 3A-3B are graphical representations of a portion of the diffractive profile of a conventional diffractive multifocal lens.



FIG. 4 illustrates a diffractive profile of a bifocal optic.



FIG. 5 illustrates a diffractive profile of a trifocal optic.



FIG. 6 illustrates a profile of an optic in which a trifocal diffractive pattern is only positioned on a central zone of an optic, with a peripheral zone including a refractive surface.



FIG. 7 illustrates a profile of an optic that does not include echelettes that repeat having the same width in r-squared space.



FIG. 8 illustrates a profile of an optic including a set of echelettes that repeat.



FIG. 9 illustrates a graph of a predicted defocus curve for the profile of the optic shown in FIG. 8.



FIG. 10 illustrates a profile of an optic in which at least one echelette of the diffractive profile has a different width in r-squared space than any other echelette of the diffractive profile.



FIG. 11 illustrates a profile of an optic including a central zone including a refractive profile and a diffractive profile, and a peripheral zone including a refractive surface.



FIG. 12 illustrates a profile of an optic including a diffractive profile and having a plurality of refractive zones.



FIG. 13 illustrates an embodiment of a system.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION


FIGS. 1A, 1B, 2A, 2B, 3A and 3B illustrate multifocal IOL lens geometries, aspects of which are described in U.S. Patent Publication No. 2011-0149236 A1, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.



FIG. 1A is a cross-sectional view of an eye E fit with a multifocal IOL 11. As shown, multifocal IOL 11 may, for example, comprise a bifocal IOL. Multifocal IOL 11 receives light from at least a portion of cornea 12 at the front of eye E and is generally centered about the optical axis of eye E. For ease of reference and clarity, FIGS. 1A and 1B do not disclose the refractive properties of other parts of the eye, such as the corneal surfaces. Only the refractive and/or diffractive properties of the multifocal IOL 11 are illustrated.


Each major face of lens 11, including the anterior (front) surface and posterior (back) surface, generally has a refractive profile, e.g. biconvex, plano-convex, plano-concave, meniscus, etc. The two surfaces together, in relation to the properties of the surrounding aqueous humor, cornea, and other optical components of the overall optical system, define the effects of the lens 11 on the imaging performance by eye E. Conventional, monofocal IOLs have a refractive power based on the refractive index of the material from which the lens is made, and also on the curvature or shape of the front and rear surfaces or faces of the lens. One or more support elements may be configured to secure the lens 11 to a patient's eye.


Multifocal lenses may optionally also make special use of the refractive properties of the lens. Such lenses generally include different powers in different regions of the lens so as to mitigate the effects of presbyopia. For example, as shown in FIG. 1A, a perimeter region of refractive multifocal lens 11 may have a power which is suitable for viewing at far viewing distances. The same refractive multifocal lens 11 may also include an inner region having a higher surface curvature and a generally higher overall power (sometimes referred to as a positive add power) suitable for viewing at near distances.


Rather than relying entirely on the refractive properties of the lens, multifocal diffractive IOLs or contact lenses can also have a diffractive power, as illustrated by the IOL 18 shown in FIG. 1B. The diffractive power can, for example, comprise positive or negative power, and that diffractive power may be a significant (or even the primary) contributor to the overall optical power of the lens. The diffractive power is conferred by a plurality of concentric diffractive zones which form a diffractive profile. The diffractive profile may either b e imposed on the anterior face or posterior face or both.


The diffractive profile of a diffractive multifocal lens directs incoming light into a number of diffraction orders. As light 13 enters from the front of the eye, the multifocal lens 18 directs light 13 to form a far field focus 15a on retina 16 for viewing distant objects and a near field focus 15b for viewing objects close to the eye. Depending on the distance from the source of light 13, the focus on retina 16 may be the near field focus 15b instead. Typically, far field focus 15a is associated with 0th diffractive order and near field focus 15b is associated with the 1st diffractive order, although other orders may be used as well.


Bifocal ophthalmic lens 18 typically distributes the majority of light energy into two viewing orders, often with the goal of splitting imaging light energy about evenly (50%:50%), one viewing order corresponding to far vision and one viewing order corresponding to near vision, although typically, some fraction goes to non-viewing orders.


Corrective optics may be provided by phakic IOLs, which can be used to treat patients while leaving the natural lens in place. Phakic IOLs may be angle supported, iris supported, or sulcus supported. The phakic IOL can be placed over the natural crystalline lens or piggy-backed over another IOL. It is also envisioned that the present disclosure may be applied to inlays, onlays, accommodating IOLs, pseudophakic IOLs, other forms of intraocular implants, spectacles, and even laser vision correction.



FIGS. 2A and 2B show aspects of a conventional diffractive multifocal lens 20. Multifocal lens 20 may have certain optical properties that are generally similar to those of multifocal IOLs 11, 18 described above. Multifocal lens 20 has an anterior lens face 21 and a posterior lens face 22 disposed about an optical axis 24 that is at the central zone 25 of the lens 20. The faces 21, 22, or optical surfaces, extend radially outward from the optical axis 24 to an outer periphery 27 of the optic. The faces 21, 22, or optical surfaces, face opposite each other.


When fitted onto the eye of a subject or patient, the optical axis of lens 20 is generally aligned with the optical axis of eye E. The curvature of lens 20 gives lens 20 an anterior refractive profile and a posterior refractive profile. Although a diffractive profile may also be imposed on either anterior face 21 and posterior face 22 or both, FIG. 2B shows posterior face 22 with a diffractive profile. The diffractive profile is characterized by a plurality of annular diffractive zones or echelettes 23 spaced about optical axis 24. While analytical optics theory generally assumes an infinite number of echelettes, a standard multifocal diffractive IOL typically has at least 9 echelettes, and may have over 30 echelettes. For the sake of clarity, FIG. 2B shows only 4 echelettes. Typically, an IOL is biconvex, or possibly plano-convex, or convex-concave, although an IOL could be plano-plano, or other refractive surface combinations.



FIGS. 3A and 3B are graphical representations of a portion of a typical diffractive profile of a multifocal lens. While the graph shows only 3 echelettes, typical diffractive lenses extend to at least 9 echelettes to over 32 echelettes. In FIG. 3A, the height 32 of the surface relief profile (from a plane perpendicular to the light rays) of each point on the echelette surface is plotted against the square of the radial distance (r2 or ρ) from the optical axis of the lens (referred to as r-squared space). In multifocal lenses, each echelette 23 may have a diameter or distance from the optical axis which is often proportional to √n, n being the number of the echelette 23 as counted from the optical axis 24. Each echelette has a characteristic optical zone 30 and transition zone 31. Optical zone 30 typically has a shape or downward slope that is parabolic as shown in FIG. 3B. The slope of each echelette in r-squared space (shown in FIG. 3A), however, is the same. As for the typical diffractive multifocal lens, as shown here, all echelettes have the same surface area. The area of echelettes 23 determines the diffractive power of lens 20, and, as area and radii are correlated, the diffractive power is also related to the radii of the echelettes. The physical offset of the trailing edge of each echelette to the leading edge of the adjacent echelette is the step height. An exemplary step height between adjacent echelettes is marked as reference number 33 in FIG. 3A. The step heights remain the same in r-squared space (FIG. 3A) and in linear space (FIG. 3B). The step offset is the height offset of the transition zone from the underlying base curve. An exemplary step offset is marked as reference number 501 in FIG. 5.


Conventional multifocal diffractive lenses typically provide for near and far vision, neglecting visual performance at intermediate distances. FIG. 4, for example, illustrates a diffractive profile of a bifocal optic. The diffractive profile 400 is shown relative to the Y axis 402, which represents the phase shift of the diffractive profile 400. The height is shown in units of millimeter (mm), and may represent the distance from the base spherical wavefront generated by the lens. In other embodiments, other units or scalings may be utilized. The height or phase shift of the diffractive profile 400 is shown in relation to the radius on the X axis 404 from the optical axis 406 in r-squared space. The radial coordinate represents the distance from the optical axis 406 in r-squared space, and is shown in units of millimeters squared, although in other embodiments, other units or scalings may be utilized.


The diffractive profile 400 includes a plurality of echelettes (representative echelettes 408a, 408b, 408c are marked) that each have the same width in r-squared space. The step height of each echelette is also the same in the diffractive profile 400. The diffractive pattern accordingly may direct light to two focuses (forming a bifocal optic).



FIG. 5 illustrates a diffractive profile of a trifocal optic. The diffractive profile 500 is shown relative to the Y axis 502, which represents the phase shift of the diffractive profile 500. The height is shown in units of millimeter (mm), and may represent the distance from the base spherical wavefront generated by the lens. In other embodiments, other units or scalings may be utilized. The height or phase shift of the diffractive profile 500 is shown in relation to the radius on the X axis 504 from the optical axis 506 in r-squared space. The radial coordinate represents the distance from the optical axis 506 in r-squared space, and is shown in units of millimeters squared, although in other embodiments, other units or scalings may be utilized.


The diffractive profile 500 includes a plurality of echelettes. The echelettes are provided as repeating set of two different echelettes, with one configuration of echelette being marked in FIG. 5 as echelettes 508a, 508b, and another configuration of echelette being marked in FIG. 5 as echelette 510a, 510b. The width in r-squared space and the step height and step offset of each configuration of echelette (e.g., echelette 508a, 508b) is repeated upon the optic. The echelettes 508a, 508b for example have the same width in r-squared space as each other, and the echelettes 510a, 510b have the same width in r-squared space as each other. The diffractive pattern accordingly may direct light to three focuses (forming a trifocal optic).


The optic represented in FIG. 5 may be modified to include at least one zone that does not include the diffractive pattern. FIG. 6 for example represents an optic in which a trifocal diffractive pattern 600 is only positioned on a central zone of an optic, with a peripheral zone including a refractive surface 602. In FIG. 6, the diffractive profile 600 is shown relative to the Y axis 604, which represents the phase shift of the diffractive profile 600. The height is shown in units of millimeters (mm), and may represent the distance from the base spherical wavefront generated by the lens. In other embodiments, other units or scalings may be utilized. The height or phase shift of the diffractive profile 600 is shown in relation to the radius on the X axis 606 from the optical axis 608 in r-squared space. The radial coordinate represents the distance from the optical axis 608 in r-squared space, and is shown in units of millimeters squared, although in other embodiments, other units or scalings may be utilized.



FIG. 7 illustrates an embodiment of an optic that does not include echelettes that repeat having the same width in r-squared space. The optic includes a diffractive profile 700 including a plurality of echelettes, each echelette of the diffractive profile 700 having a different width in r-squared space than any other echelette of the diffractive profile 700. In embodiments, each echelette of the diffractive profile 700 may be configured to distribute light to a distance focus. The diffractive profile 700 may serve to provide for an extended range of vision that may help to improve the visual performance at intermediate distances and may reduce other visual symptoms associated with diffractive optics including glare and halos.


In the embodiment of FIG. 7, a diffractive profile 700 is provided that includes a plurality of echelettes 702a-d and that is disposed on a surface of an optic such that each one of the plurality of echelettes 702a-d have a different width than each other in r-squared space. The diffractive profile 700 is shown relative to the Y axis 706, which represents the phase shift of the diffractive profile 700. The height is shown in units of millimeter (mm), and may represent the distance from the base spherical wavefront generated by the lens. In other embodiments, other units or scalings may be utilized. The height or phase shift of the diffractive profile 700 is shown in relation to the radius on the X axis 708 from the optical axis 704 in r-squared space. The radial coordinate represents the distance from the optical axis 704 in r-squared space, and is shown in units of millimeters squared, although in other embodiments, other units or scalings may be utilized.


Each echelette 702a-d may be positioned on a surface of the optic, with the surface extending radially outward from the optical axis 704 to the outer periphery of the optic (such as the outer periphery 27 marked in FIG. 2B). Each echelette 702a-d may be positioned adjacent to each other, as shown in FIG. 7, or in other embodiments spacings may be provided between the echelettes 702a-d.


The different widths in r-squared space of the echelettes 702a-d may correspond to different diffractive or add powers of the optic. The echelette 702b for example, may correspond to a diffractive or add power of 3 diopter, for example. The echelette 702c for example, may correspond to a diffractive or add power of 2.4 diopter, for example. The echelette 702d for example, may correspond to a diffractive or add power of 1.8 diopter, for example. The corresponding diffractive or add power may be different for each echelette 702a-d. Various other diffractive or add powers may be utilized as desired.


In embodiments, the echelettes 702a-d may each distribute some light to a distance focus, to provide a smooth, extended depth of focus or extended range of vision for the individual, decreased visual symptoms, and improved distance vision. Further, at least one of the echelettes 702a-d may be configured to distribute light to a near focus or to an intermediate focus. In embodiments, the echelettes 702a-d may be configured to split light to both a distance focus and a near focus, or to a distance focus, an intermediate focus, and/or a near focus.


The irregular width of the echelettes 702a-d may provide a smooth, extended depth of focus or extended range of vision for the individual and may break the symmetry between the r-squared distances of transition zones between the echelettes, thus reducing undesired visual symptoms. The diffractive profile may form an extended depth of focus. The diffractive profile may also modify chromatic aberration in a distance focus. Combinations of features may be provided as desired.


One or more of the echelettes 702a-d may have the same step height as each other. For example, as shown in FIG. 7, the echelettes 702b-d may have the same step heights as each other. In other embodiments, any or at least two of the echelettes 702a-d may have a same step height or a different step height than each other.


In one embodiment, the diffractive profile 700 may include a plurality of echelettes 702a-d disposed on a surface of the optic such that each one of the plurality of echelettes 702a-d between the optical axis and the outer periphery of the optic has a different width in r-squared space than any other echelette on the surface of the optic between the optical axis and the outer periphery of the optic.


In one embodiment, the echelettes 702a-d of the diffractive profile 700 may be positioned in a central zone 710, that the optical axis 704 may pass through. The optic may include a peripheral zone 712 positioned radially outward of the central zone 710, which may not include a diffractive profile in certain embodiments. The peripheral zone 712 as shown in FIG. 7 may include a refractive surface, which may be adjacent to the central zone 710 and the diffractive profile 700. Other configurations of optic may be utilized, for example, the diffractive profile 700 may extend outward to the outer periphery of the optic in certain embodiments, or a central zone 710 may not include a diffractive profile, with a peripheral zone including a diffractive profile, or an intermediate zone (between refractive surfaces) including a diffractive profile. In embodiments, the central zone 710 may include a refractive surface that may be positioned radially inward of the diffractive profile 700. In embodiments, a refractive surface may provide one or more of an intermediate focus, a near focus, or an extended depth of focus.


The number of echelettes of the diffractive profile 700 may vary. For example, the number may include two echelettes. The number may include at least three echelettes. The number may include at least four echelettes. The number may include at least five echelettes. A greater or lesser number of echelettes may be utilized as desired. In each embodiment, a step height of at least two of the echelettes may be the same, or a step height of at least two of the echelettes may be different.


In embodiments, a diffractive profile may include at least one set of echelettes, with each echelette of the set having a different width in r-squared space than any other echelette of the set. In embodiments, the at least one set may repeat at least once upon the optic. FIG. 8, for example, illustrates an embodiment in solid lines of a diffractive profile 800 of such an embodiment. FIG. 8 illustrates in dashed lines a profile 802 of a trifocal optic, such as shown in FIG. 5, for comparison purposes with the diffractive profile 800 shown in solid lines.


The diffractive profile 800 includes at least one set 804 of echelettes 806a-d. The echelettes 806a-d of the set 804 each have a different width in r-squared space than any other echelette of the set 804. The set 804 includes four echelettes 806a-d, however, in embodiments, the set may include a greater or lesser number of echelettes. For example, the set 804 may include two echelettes, three echelettes, four echelettes, five echelettes, or may include at least two, at least three, at least four, at least five echelettes, etc. as desired.


The echelettes 806a-d of the set 804 are shown relative to the Y axis 808, which represents the phase shift of the diffractive profile 800. The height or phase shift of the diffractive profile 800 is shown in relation to the radius on the X axis 810 from the optical axis 812 in r-squared space. The radial coordinate represents the distance from the optical axis 812 in r-squared space, and is shown in units of millimeters squared, although in other embodiments, other units or scalings may be utilized.


Each echelette 806a-d may be positioned on a surface of the optic, with the surface extending radially outward from the optical axis 812 to the outer periphery of the optic (such as the outer periphery 27 marked in FIG. 2B). Each echelette 806a-d may be positioned adjacent to each other, as shown in FIG. 8, or in other embodiments spacings may be provided between the echelette 806a-d.


Each echelette 806a-d of the set 804 may have a different step height and step offset as shown in FIG. 8, or in embodiments any number may have the same step height or step offset as desired. For example, at least two echelettes 806a-d of the set may have a same step height and/or step offset, or at least two echelettes 806a-d of the set may have a different step height and/or step offset.


The set 804 may be positioned ata central zone 814 of the optic, or may be positioned at a different location as desired. For example, in embodiments, the set 804 may be at a distance from the optical axis 812 and may be in an intermediate zone or peripheral zone of the optic in embodiments. In embodiments, a peripheral zone may be provided that may include a refractive surface. In embodiments, the central zone 814 may include a refractive surface that is positioned radially inward of the diffractive profile. The optic may include a refractive surface that may provide one or more of an intermediate focus, a near focus, or an extended depth of focus.


The set 804 may repeat upon the optic at least once. In the embodiment shown in FIG. 8, for example, the set 804 is repeated upon the optic to form repeated set 804′ including the repeated echelettes 806a′, 806b′, 806c′, and 806d′. The repeated set 804′ is shown adjacent to the set 804, although in embodiments a spacing or other portion of the diffractive profile may be positioned betweenthe sets 804, 804′. The echelettes 806a′, 806b′, 806c′, and 806d′ of the repeated set 804′ may be identical to the respective echelettes 806a, 806b, 806c, and 806d of the original set 804, and may have the same width in r-squared space as the respective original echelette 806a, 806b, 806c, and 806d of the original set 804.


In embodiments, the set 804 may repeat more than once upon the optic. For example, the set 804 may repeat twice upon the optic, or at least twice upon the optic in embodiments (e.g, three times, four times, etc.). The set 804 may repeat at least three times upon the optic, or at least four times, etc. In embodiments, the set 804 may repeat along an entire pupillary zone of the optic, comprisingthe portion of the optic exposed to light through the patient's pupil. The pupillary zone may extend outward from the optical axis 812 towards the outer periphery of the optic. The set 804 may be repeated a desired number of times to cover the entire pupillary zone in embodiments as desired. In other embodiments, only a portion of the optic or the pupillary zone may include a repeating set of echelettes.


The optic may include a single repeating set of echelettes, or may include multiple different sets of echelettes that repeat. In embodiments, each echelette of the respective set may have a different width in r-squared space than any other echelette of that set. In embodiments, the set may not repeat upon the optic. For example, FIG. 7 illustrates an embodiment of a set 702a, 702b, 702c, 702d that does not repeat upon the optic.


In an embodiment as shown in FIG. 8, each echelette, or at least one echelette of the set, may be configured to distribute light to a near focus or may be configured to distribute light to an intermediate focus. The diffractive profile 800 may form an extended depth of focus. The diffractive profile may also modify chromatic aberration in a distance focus. Combinations of features may be provided as desired.


The repeating set of echelettes, as shown in FIG. 8, may be repeated throughout the whole pupil to provide improved distance and near vision, and a continuous range of vision for a variety of pupil sizes including large pupil sizes. FIG. 9, for example, illustrates a graph 900 of defocus for the diffractive profile 800 shown in FIG. 8, with defocus in units of diopter shown on the X-axis 902 and predicted visual acuity shown on the Y-axis 904. The defocus 906 of the diffractive profile 800 shown in FIG. 8 for a 3 millimeter pupil is shown in solid line, with the defocus 908 of a trifocal diffractive profile (as shown in FIG. 8 in dashed lines) shown for comparison. The defocus 906 of the diffractive profile is shown to provide an improved continuous range of vision, whereas the trifocal diffractive profile is shown to have three distinct peaks.


In embodiments, a diffractive profile may result in correction of chromatic aberration. A diffractive profile may inherently compensate partially or fully for a longitudinal chromatic aberration of the eye. Correction of chromatic aberration may occur by having a diffractive profile with a step size of 1 wavelength or higher. This may occur in monofocal, multifocal, or extended depth of focus lenses.


An aperiodic diffractive profile, as shown in FIGS. 7 and 8 for example, may result in correction of longitudinal chromatic aberration, yet may direct light to different distance foci. An echelette of an aperiodic diffractive profile having a corresponding diffractive power of 2.5 diopter, for example may direct light to a different distances than an echelette of the profile having a corresponding diffractive power of 1.5 diopter.


In embodiments, a diffractive profile may be provided that may include a plurality of echelettes, with at least one echelette of the diffractive profile having a same width in r-squared space as another echelette of the diffractive profile, and at least one echelette of the diffractive profile having a different width in r-squared space than any other echelette of the diffractive profile.



FIG. 10, for example, illustrates such an embodiment, in which a diffractive profile 1000 is provided, with at least one echelette 1002a having a same width in r-squared as another echelette 1002b of the diffractive profile 1000, and at least one echelette 1002h of the diffractive profile 1000 having a different width in r-squared space than any other echelette of the diffractive profile 1000. The echelettes 1002a-h of the profile 1000 are shown relative to the Y axis 1004, which represents the phase shift of the diffractive profile 1000. The height or phase shift of the diffractive profile 1000 is shown in relation to the radius on the X axis 1006 from an optical axis in r-squared space.


The echelette 1002a has a same width in r-squared space than other echelettes 1002b, c, d-g of the profile 1000, yet has a different width than the echelette 1002h. Thus, in embodiments, at least one echelette 1002h may have a different width in r-squared space than any other echelette of the profile 1000, with the remaining echelettes 1002a-c, d-g each having the same with in r-squared space. Various other modifications may be provided (e.g., at least two echelettes may have a different width in r-squared space than any other echelette of the diffractive profile, at least three, at least four, etc.). Further, the number of echelettes that have a same width in r-squared space may be varied in embodiments as desired, for example, two echelettes of the diffractive profile may have a same width in r-squared space as each other, at least three, at least four, etc.


The total number of echelettes of the diffractive profile 1000 may be varied as desired. For example, in embodiments, the plurality of echelettes of the diffractive profile 1000 may include at least three echelettes, at least four echelettes, at least five echelettes, etc. Eight echelettes are shown as marked in FIG. 10, however a greater or lesser number of echelettes may be provided in FIG. 10, and in all other embodiments of diffractive profiles disclosed herein. The echelettes of the diffractive profile 1000 may each have a same step height as each other or a different step height. In embodiments, at least two of the echelettes of the diffractive profile may have a different step height. In embodiments, at least two of the echelettes of the diffractive profile may have a same step height. Various modifications may be provided as desired.


Features of other embodiments disclosed herein may be utilized with the diffractive profile. For example, at least one echelette of the diffractive profile may be configured to distribute light to a distance focus. In embodiments, at least one echelette of the diffractive profile may be configured to distribute light to a near focus or to an intermediate focus. The diffractive profile may form an extended depth of focus. The diffractive profile may also modify chromatic aberration in a distance focus. Combinations of features may be provided as desired.


Other features may be utilized with the diffractive profile. For example, the diffractive profile 1000 may be disposed on a first surface of an optic such that at least one echelette of the diffractive profile on the first surface between the optical axis and the outer periphery of the optic has a same width in r-squared space as another echelette of the diffractive profile on the first surface between the optical axis and the outer periphery of the optic. At least one echelette of the diffractive profile on the first surface between the optical axis and the outer periphery of the optic may have a different width in r-squared space than any other echelette of the diffractive profile on the first surface between the optical axis and the outer periphery of the optic. The optic may include a central zone and a peripheral zone, and the diffractive profile may be positioned on the central zone, and the peripheral zone may include a refractive surface. A refractive surface as disclosed herein may provide one or more of an intermediate focus, a near focus, or an extended depth of focus.


In embodiments, a central zone may include a refractive surface that is positioned radially inward of the diffractive profile 1000. Various other modifications and combinations of features across embodiments may be provided as desired.



FIG. 11, for example, illustrates an embodiment of a diffractive profile 1100 configured similarly as the profile shown in FIG. 7, yet with a central zone 1102 including a refractive surface. The refractive surface of the central zone 1102 is positioned radially inward of the diffractive profile 1100. The profile further includes a refractive surface positioned in a peripheral zone 1104. The central zone 1102 includes the diffractive profile 1100, which may be intermediate of the refractive surfaces of the central zone 1102 and the peripheral zone 1104. The diffractive profile 1100 may be adjacent to the refractive surface of the central zone 1102 and the refractive surface of the peripheral zone 1104. Any embodiment of diffractive profile disclosed herein may include a central zone having a refractive surface positioned radially inward of the diffractive profile.


In embodiments, to receive benefits of correction of longitudinal chromatic aberration provided by an aperiodic diffractive profile, yet to have the echelettes of the diffractive profile direct light to the same distance foci, a refractive profile may be utilized to vary a distance focus of the echelettes of the diffractive profile. The diffractive profile may include at least one echelette having a power and having a different width in r-squared space than another echelette of the diffractive profile, and being configured to distribute light to a distance focus. The refractive profile may have a refractive zone with a width corresponding to a width of the at least one echelette and having a power that is negative or positive with respect to the power of the at least one echelette, and configured to vary a distance focus of the at least one echelette.



FIG. 12, for example, illustrates a profile of such an optic, including a diffractive profile 1200 and a refractive profile 1202. The diffractive profile 1200 may be configured as an aperiodic profile, and may be configured similarly as the profile 800 shown in FIG. 8 in embodiments. For example, the profile 1200 may include at least one set of echelettes 1204a-c that may repeat upon the optic (although not shown in FIG. 12, the echelettes 1204a-c may repeat upon the optic in a similar manner as shown in FIG. 8, e.g., once or twice, or a greater number of repetitions). In embodiments, the profile 1200 may include at least one set of echelettes that includes at least two echelettes and repeats upon the optic. In embodiments, a set may include at least three echelettes. In embodiments, the profile may be configured similarly as the profile 700 shown in FIG. 7 and may include a set that does not repeat upon the optic, or may have another profile. The diffractive profile may include at least one echelette having a power and having a different width in r-squared space than another echelette of the diffractive profile, and being configured to distribute light to a distance focus.


The diffractive profile 1200 may be configured in embodiments such that the echelettes 1204a-c each have corresponding diffractive powers between 1 and 2 diopters. In embodiments, other powers may be utilized for the echelettes 1204a-c. For example, in embodiments the corresponding diffractive powers may be between 1 and 3 diopters, or other powers as desired.


The refractive profile 1202 may be a multi-zonal profile and may include a plurality of refractive zones 1206a-c. Each refractive zone 1206a-c may have a width that corresponds to the width of a respective one of the echelettes 1204a-c, and may match the width as shown in FIG. 12 for example. Each refractive zone 1206a-c may have a power that is negative with respect to the power of the respective one of the echelettes 1204a-c. For example, if an echelette 1204c has a corresponding diffractive power of 1.5 diopters, the corresponding refractive zone 1206c may have a power of negative 1.5 diopters. In embodiments, each refractive zone 1206a-c may have a power that is positive with respect to the power of the respective one of the echelettes 1204a-c (e.g, either positive or negative). In embodiments, each refractive zone 1206a-c may be configured to have a power that counteracts the power of the corresponding one of the echelettes 1204a-c. In embodiments, each refractive zone 1206a-c may be configured to have a power that does not counteract the power of the corresponding one of the echelettes 1204a-c.


Each refractive zone 1206a-c may vary the distance focus of the corresponding echelette 1204a-c. In this manner, the correction of longitudinal chromatic aberration provided by the aperiodic diffractive profile 1200 may be achieved, while the distance focus of the echelettes 1204a-c may be the same.


Further, in embodiments herein in which a set of echelettes 1204a-c repeats, the refractive zones of the refractive profile 1202 may repeat, corresponding to the repeating echelettes 1204a-c of the diffractive profile 1200.


In some embodiments, the refractive profile 1202 may be positioned on an opposite optical surface of the optic, with each zone of the refractive profile 1202 positioned optically aligned with a corresponding one of the echelettes 1204a-c. In other embodiments, the refractive profile 1202 may be positioned on the same optical surface as the diffractive profile 1200.


The diffractive profile 1200 and refractive profile 1202 may extend along the optic from the optical axis outward, and may cover the entire pupillary zone of the optic. The optic may have a spatially varying amount of chromatic aberration correction, and may have an amount of longitudinal chromatic aberration correction that differs spatially from the optical axis outward towards the outer periphery of the optic. The amount of longitudinal chromatic aberration may differ over the pupil.


In embodiments, the diffractive profile and refractive profile may cover only a portion of the pupillary zone of the optic. For example, in an embodiment including a diffractive profile 700 such as shown in FIG. 7, in which a refractive profile is positioned at the peripheral zone 712 of the optic, a multizonal refractive profile 1202 as shown may not be utilized at the peripheral zone 712.


In embodiments, utilizing a multizonal refractive profile as disclosed may improve distance modulation transfer function (MTF) by, e.g., 15% for a 3 millimeter pupil and 30% for a 5 millimeter pupil, if diffractive powers of the diffractive profile 1200 are in the range of 1-3 diopter.


The optical or clinical behavior of the embodiments enclosed herein may characterized by a multifocal behavior or by and extended depth of focus behavior, or by a combination thereof. In all of these cases, the embodiments provide patients with an extended range of vision, being larger than that obtain with standard monofocal lenses.


In embodiments, longitudinal chromatic aberration may be reduced by combining two lens materials having different Abbe numbers. Such a doublet may be combined with an aperiodic diffractive profile as disclosed herein.


An optic for an ophthalmic lens that includes a diffractive profile or refractive profile disclosed herein may be fabricated utilizing a variety of methods. A method may include determining optical aberrations of a patient's eye. Measurements of a patient's eye may be made in a clinical setting, such as by an optometrist, ophthalmologist, or other medical or optical professional. The measurements may be made via manifest refraction, autorefraction, tomography, or a combination of these methods or other measurement methods. The optical aberrations of the patient's eye may be determined.


A determination of the visual range of the patient may also be determined. For example, the ability of the patient to focus on near objects (presbyopia) may be measured and determined. A range of corresponding diffractive powers for the ophthalmic lens may be determined.


The measurements of the patient's eye may be placed in an ophthalmic lens prescription, which includes features of an optic that are intended to address the optical aberrations of the patient's eye, as well as features that address the visual range for the patient (e.g., an amount of corresponding diffractive power, a number of focuses, or a range of vision to be provided by the optic).


The ophthalmic lens prescription may be utilized to fabricate an optic for the ophthalmic lens. A refractive profile of the optic may be determined based on the ophthalmic lens prescription, to correct for the optical aberrations of the patient's eye. Such a refractive profile may be applied to the optic, whether on a surface including the diffractive profile or on an opposite optical surface. The diffractive profile may also be determined to provide for the desired distribution of corresponding diffractive powers for the optic.


The determination of one or more of a refractive or diffractive profile and the fabrication of the optic may be performed remotely from the optometrist, ophthalmologist, or other medical or optical professional that performed the measurements of a patient's eye, or may be performed in the same clinical facility of such an individual. If performed remotely, the fabricated optic may be delivered to an optometrist, ophthalmologist, or other medical or optical professional, for being provided to a patient. For an intraocular lens, the fabricated optic may be provided for implant into a patient's eye.


The fabricated optic may be a custom optic fabricated specifically for the patient's eye, or may be fabricated in a manufacturing assembly and then selected by an optometrist, ophthalmologist, or other medical or optical professional for supply to a patient, which may include implantation in the patient's eye.



FIG. 13 illustrates an embodiment of a system 1300 that may be utilized to perform all ora portion of the methods disclosed herein. The system 1300 may include a processor 1302, an input 1304, and a memory 1306. In certain embodiments the system 1300 may include a manufacturing assembly 1308.


The processor 1302 may comprise a central processing unit (CPU) or other form of processor. In certain embodiments the processor 1302 may comprise one or more processors. The processor 1302 may include one or more processors that are distributed in certain embodiments, for example, the processor 1302 may be positioned remote from other components of the system 1300 or may be utilized in a cloud computing environment. The memory 1306 may comprise a memory that is readable by the processor 1302. The memory 1306 may store instructions, or features of intraocular lenses, or other parameters that may be utilized by the processor 1302 to perform the methods disclosed herein. The memory 1306 may comprise a hard disk, read-only memory (ROM), random access memory (RAM) or other form of non-transient medium for storing data. The input 1304 may comprise a port, terminal, physical input device, or other form of input. The port or terminal may comprise a physical port or terminal or an electronic port or terminal. The port may comprise a wired or wireless communication device in certain embodiments. The physical input device may comprise a keyboard, touchscreen, keypad, pointer device, or other form of physical input device. The input 1304 may be configured to provide an input to the processor 1302.


The system 1300 may be utilized to perform the methods disclosed herein, such as the processes of determining a diffractive profile of the optic, as well as a refractive profile of the optic. The processor 1302 may be configured to determine the diffractive profile to provide for various corresponding diffractive powers for the optic, as well as determining a refractive profile to correct for ocular aberrations of the patient.


The processor 1302 may provide the refractive profile and/or diffractive profile to the manufacturing assembly 1308, which may be configured to fabricate the optic for the ophthalmic lens based on the refractive profile and/or diffractive profile. The manufacturing assembly 1308 may comprise one or more apparatuses for forming the optic, and may comprise a high volume manufacturing assembly or a low volume manufacturing assembly. The manufacturing assembly 1308 may be used for manufacture remote to a clinic in which measurements of the individual's eye or made, or local to such a clinic. The manufacturing assembly may include apparatuses such as lathe tools, or other lens formation devices to fabricate the optic.


In one embodiment, the processor 1302 may be provided with an ophthalmic lens prescription for the individual's eye that may be provided as discussed herein. The processor 1302 may receive the ophthalmic lens via the input 1304. The system 1300 may fabricate the optic for the ophthalmic lens based on the prescription.


The system 1300 may be configured to fabricate any of the embodiments of ophthalmic lenses disclosed herein.


In one embodiment, a diffractive profile such as the profile 700, profile 800, profile 1000, profile 1100, or profile 1200 may be positioned on a surface of a lens that is opposite an aspheric surface. The aspheric surface on the opposite side of the lens may be designed to reduce comeal spherical aberration of the patient.


In one embodiment, one or both surfaces of the lens may be aspherical, or include a refractive surface designed to extend the depth of focus, or create multifocality.


In one embodiment, a refractive zone on one or both surfaces of the lens may be utilized that may be the same size or different in size as one of the diffractive zones. The refractive zone includes a refractive surface designed to extend the depth of focus, or create multifocality.


Any of the embodiments of lens profiles discussed herein may be apodized to produce a desired result. The apodization may result in the step heights and step offsets of the echelettes being gradually varied according to the apodization, as to gradually increasing the amount of light in the distance focus as a function of pupil diameter.


The features of the optics disclosed herein may be utilized by themselves, or in combination with refractive profiles of the optics and/or with features providing for correction of chromatic aberrations (e.g., achromats, which may be diffractive).


The ophthalmic lenses disclosed herein in the form of intraocular lenses are not limited to lenses for placement in the individual's capsular bag. For example, the intraocular lenses may comprise those positioned within the anterior chamber of the eye. In certain embodiments the intraocular lenses may comprise “piggy back” lenses or other forms of supplemental intraocular lenses.


Features of embodiments may be modified, substituted, excluded, or combined as desired.


In addition, the methods herein are not limited to the methods specifically described, and may include methods of utilizing the systems and apparatuses disclosed herein.


In closing, it is to be understood that although aspects of the present specification are highlighted by referring to specific embodiments, one skilled in the art will readily appreciate that these disclosed embodiments are only illustrative of the principles of the subject matter disclosed herein. Therefore, it should be understood that the disclosed subject matter is in no way limited to a particular methodology, protocol, and/or reagent, etc., described herein. As such, various modifications or changes to or alternative configurations of the disclosed subject matter can be made in accordance with the teachings herein without departing from the spirit of the present specification. Lastly, the terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only, and is not intended to limit the scope of systems, apparatuses, and methods as disclosed herein, which is defined solely by the claims. Accordingly, the systems, apparatuses, and methods are not limited to that precisely as shown and described.


Certain embodiments of systems, apparatuses, and methods are described herein, including the best mode known to the inventors for carrying out the same. Of course, variations on these described embodiments will become apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art upon reading the foregoing description. The inventor expects skilled artisans to employ such variations as appropriate, and the inventors intend for the systems, apparatuses, and methods to be practiced otherwise than specifically described herein. Accordingly, the systems, apparatuses, and methods include all modifications and equivalents of the subject matter recited in the claims appended hereto as permitted by applicable law. Moreover, any combination of the above-described embodiments in all possible variations thereof is encompassed by the systems, apparatuses, and methods unless otherwise indicated herein or otherwise clearly contradicted by context.


Groupings of alternative embodiments, elements, or steps of the systems, apparatuses, and methods are not to be construed as limitations. Each group member may be referred to and claimed individually or in any combination with other group members disclosed herein. It is anticipated that one or more members of a group may be included in, or deleted from, a group for reasons of convenience and/or patentability. When any such inclusion or deletion occurs, the specification is deemed to contain the group as modified thus fulfilling the written description of all Markush groups used in the appended claims.


The terms “a,” “an,” “the” and similar referents used in the context of describing the systems, apparatuses, and methods (especially in the context of the following claims) are to be construed to cover both the singular and the plural, unless otherwise indicated herein or clearly contradicted by context. All methods described herein can be performed in any suitable order unless otherwise indicated herein or otherwise clearly contradicted by context. The use of any and all examples, or exemplary language (e.g., “such as”) provided herein is intended merely to better illuminate the systems, apparatuses, and methods and does not pose a limitation on the scope of the systems, apparatuses, and methods otherwise claimed. No language in the present specification should be construed as indicating any non-claimed element essential to the practice of the systems, apparatuses, and methods.


All patents, patent publications, and other publications referenced and identified in the present specification are individually and expressly incorporated herein by reference in their entirety for the purpose of describing and disclosing, for example, the compositions and methodologies described in such publications that might be used in connection with the systems, apparatuses, and methods. These publications are provided solely for their disclosure prior to the filing date of the present application. Nothing in this regard should be construed as an admission that the inventors are not entitled to antedate such disclosure by virtue of prior invention or for any other reason. All statements as to the date or representation as to the contents of these documents is based on the information available to the applicants and does not constitute any admission as to the correctness of the dates or contents of these documents.

Claims
  • 1. An ophthalmic lens comprising: an optic including a first surface and a second surface each disposed about an optical axis and extending radially outward from the optical axis to an outer periphery of the optic, the first surface facing opposite the second surface, andthe optic including a plurality of echelettes disposed on the first surface between the optical axis and the outer periphery of the optic, each of the plurality of echelettes having a different width in r-squared space than any other echelette on the first surface between the optical axis and the outer periphery of the optic,wherein the optic includes a central zone and a peripheral zone, and the plurality of echelettes are positioned on the central zone, and the peripheral zone includes a refractive surface,wherein at least two of the echelettes of the plurality of echelettes have a different step height,wherein the plurality of echelettes define at least one set of echelettes, and the at least one set of echelettes repeating at least once upon the central zone of the optic,wherein the refractive surface is adjacent to the plurality of echelettes, and extends radially outward from the plurality of echelettes to the outer periphery of the optic,wherein the plurality of echelettes provide an extended depth of focus.
  • 2. The ophthalmic lens of claim 1, wherein the plurality of echelettes includes at least three echelettes.
  • 3. The ophthalmic lens of claim 1, wherein the plurality of echelettes includes at least four echelettes.
  • 4. The ophthalmic lens of claim 1, wherein the plurality of echelettes includes at least five echelettes.
  • 5. The ophthalmic lens of claim 1, wherein at least one echelette of the plurality of echelettes is configured to distribute light to a near focus or to an intermediate focus.
  • 6. The ophthalmic lens of claim 1, wherein the plurality of echelettes modify chromatic aberration in a distance focus.
  • 7. The ophthalmic lens of claim 1, wherein the refractive surface provides one or more of an intermediate focus, a near focus, or an extended depth of focus.
  • 8. The ophthalmic lens of claim 1, wherein the optical axis of the optic passes through the central zone.
  • 9. The ophthalmic lens of claim 1, wherein at least one of the plurality of echelettes is configured to distribute light to a near focus.
  • 10. The ophthalmic lens of claim 9, wherein at least one of the plurality of echelettes is configured to distribute light to an intermediate focus.
  • 11. The ophthalmic lens of claim 10, wherein each echelette is configured to distribute light to a distance focus.
  • 12. The ophthalmic lens of claim 1, wherein each echelette of the plurality of echelettes is positioned adjacent to another echelette of the plurality of echelettes.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/955,355, filed on Dec. 30, 2019, the entire contents of which are incorporated by reference herein.

US Referenced Citations (380)
Number Name Date Kind
3367734 Karl et al. Feb 1968 A
3722986 Tagnon Mar 1973 A
4210391 Cohen et al. Jul 1980 A
4340283 Cohen Jul 1982 A
4460275 Spriggs Jul 1984 A
4504892 Zulfilar Mar 1985 A
4504982 Burk Mar 1985 A
4580883 Shinohara Apr 1986 A
4606626 Shinohara Aug 1986 A
4637697 Freeman Jan 1987 A
4640593 Shinohara Feb 1987 A
4641934 Freeman Feb 1987 A
4642112 Freeman Feb 1987 A
4655565 Freeman Apr 1987 A
4710193 Volk Dec 1987 A
4762408 Shinohara Aug 1988 A
4778462 Grendahl Oct 1988 A
4795462 Grendahl Jan 1989 A
4798608 Grendahl Jan 1989 A
4798609 Grendahl Jan 1989 A
4856234 Goins Aug 1989 A
4856889 Guilino et al. Aug 1989 A
4881804 Cohen Nov 1989 A
4881805 Cohen Nov 1989 A
4898461 Portney Feb 1990 A
4932970 Portney Jun 1990 A
4936666 Futhey Jun 1990 A
4957506 Mercier Sep 1990 A
4978211 Cornu et al. Dec 1990 A
4995714 Cohen Feb 1991 A
4995715 Cohen Feb 1991 A
5016977 Baude et al. May 1991 A
5017000 Cohen May 1991 A
5019098 Mercier May 1991 A
5050981 Roffman Sep 1991 A
5054905 Cohen Oct 1991 A
5056908 Cohen Oct 1991 A
5061058 Guilino et al. Oct 1991 A
5066301 Wiley Nov 1991 A
5076684 Simpson et al. Dec 1991 A
5089023 Swanson Feb 1992 A
5089024 Christie et al. Feb 1992 A
5096285 Silberman Mar 1992 A
5100226 Freeman Mar 1992 A
5104212 Taboury et al. Apr 1992 A
5112351 Christie et al. May 1992 A
5114220 Baude et al. May 1992 A
5116111 Simpson et al. May 1992 A
5117306 Cohen May 1992 A
5120120 Cohen Jun 1992 A
5121979 Cohen Jun 1992 A
5121980 Cohen Jun 1992 A
5129718 Futhey et al. Jul 1992 A
5144483 Cohen Sep 1992 A
5148205 Guilino et al. Sep 1992 A
5161057 Johnson Nov 1992 A
5173723 Volk et al. Dec 1992 A
5178636 Silberman Jan 1993 A
5191366 Kashiwagi Mar 1993 A
5220359 Roffman Jun 1993 A
5225858 Portney Jul 1993 A
5229797 Futhey et al. Jul 1993 A
5236970 Christ et al. Aug 1993 A
5257132 Ceglio et al. Oct 1993 A
5260727 Oksman et al. Nov 1993 A
5322649 Rheinish et al. Jun 1994 A
5344447 Swanson Sep 1994 A
5349394 Freeman et al. Sep 1994 A
5349471 Morris et al. Sep 1994 A
5381190 Rehse et al. Jan 1995 A
5384606 Koch et al. Jan 1995 A
5408281 Zhang Apr 1995 A
5443506 Garabet Aug 1995 A
5443507 Jacobi Aug 1995 A
5444106 Zhou et al. Aug 1995 A
5446508 Kitchen Aug 1995 A
5448312 Roffman et al. Sep 1995 A
5485228 Roffman et al. Jan 1996 A
5581405 Meyers et al. Dec 1996 A
5589982 Faklis et al. Dec 1996 A
5629800 Hamblen May 1997 A
5652638 Roffman et al. Jul 1997 A
5674284 Chang et al. Oct 1997 A
5682223 Menezes et al. Oct 1997 A
5683457 Gupta et al. Nov 1997 A
5684560 Roffman et al. Nov 1997 A
5684595 Kato et al. Nov 1997 A
5699142 Lee et al. Dec 1997 A
5715031 Roffman et al. Feb 1998 A
5715091 Meyers Feb 1998 A
5724258 Roffman Mar 1998 A
5728156 Gupta et al. Mar 1998 A
5748282 Freeman May 1998 A
5760871 Kosoburd et al. Jun 1998 A
5777719 Williams et al. Jul 1998 A
5796462 Roffman et al. Aug 1998 A
5800532 Lieberman Sep 1998 A
5805260 Roffman et al. Sep 1998 A
5822091 Baker Oct 1998 A
5838496 Maruyama et al. Nov 1998 A
5847802 Menezes et al. Dec 1998 A
5888122 Gupta et al. Mar 1999 A
5895422 Hauber Apr 1999 A
5895610 Chang et al. Apr 1999 A
5929969 Roffman Jul 1999 A
5968094 Werblin et al. Oct 1999 A
5968095 Norrby Oct 1999 A
5982543 Fiala Nov 1999 A
6007747 Blake et al. Dec 1999 A
6019472 Koester et al. Feb 2000 A
6050687 Bille et al. Apr 2000 A
6070980 Obara et al. Jun 2000 A
6082856 Dunn et al. Jul 2000 A
6086204 Magnante Jul 2000 A
6089711 Blankenbecler et al. Jul 2000 A
6095651 Williams et al. Aug 2000 A
6120148 Fiala et al. Sep 2000 A
6126283 Wen et al. Oct 2000 A
6126286 Portney Oct 2000 A
6139145 Israel Oct 2000 A
6142625 Sawano et al. Nov 2000 A
6145987 Baude et al. Nov 2000 A
6154323 Kamo Nov 2000 A
6199986 Williams et al. Mar 2001 B1
6210005 Portney Apr 2001 B1
6215096 Von Wallfeld et al. Apr 2001 B1
6224211 Gordon May 2001 B1
6231603 Lang et al. May 2001 B1
6270220 Keren Aug 2001 B1
6271915 Frey et al. Aug 2001 B1
6325510 Golub et al. Dec 2001 B1
6338559 Williams et al. Jan 2002 B1
6353503 Spitzer et al. Mar 2002 B1
6413276 Werblin Jul 2002 B1
6429972 Ota et al. Aug 2002 B1
6439720 Graves et al. Aug 2002 B1
6457826 Lett Oct 2002 B1
6462874 Soskind Oct 2002 B1
6464355 Gil Oct 2002 B1
6474814 Griffin Nov 2002 B1
6488708 Sarfarazi Dec 2002 B2
6491721 Freeman et al. Dec 2002 B2
6497483 Frey et al. Dec 2002 B2
6511180 Guirao et al. Jan 2003 B2
6520638 Roffman et al. Feb 2003 B1
6527389 Portney Mar 2003 B2
6533416 Fermigier et al. Mar 2003 B1
6536899 Fiala Mar 2003 B1
6537317 Steinert et al. Mar 2003 B1
6547391 Ross, III et al. Apr 2003 B2
6547822 Lang Apr 2003 B1
6554425 Roffman et al. Apr 2003 B1
6554859 Lang et al. Apr 2003 B1
6557992 Dwyer et al. May 2003 B1
6576012 Lang Jun 2003 B2
6582076 Roffman et al. Jun 2003 B1
6585375 Donitzky et al. Jul 2003 B2
6609673 Johnson Aug 2003 B1
6609793 Norrby et al. Aug 2003 B2
6616275 Dick et al. Sep 2003 B1
6655802 Zimmermann et al. Dec 2003 B2
6685315 De Feb 2004 B1
6705729 Piers et al. Mar 2004 B2
6709103 Roffman et al. Mar 2004 B1
6755524 Rubinstein et al. Jun 2004 B2
6791754 Ogawa Sep 2004 B2
6802605 Cox et al. Oct 2004 B2
6808262 Chapoy et al. Oct 2004 B2
6818158 Pham et al. Nov 2004 B2
6827444 Williams et al. Dec 2004 B2
6830332 Piers et al. Dec 2004 B2
6835204 Stork et al. Dec 2004 B1
6846326 Zadno-Azizi et al. Jan 2005 B2
6848790 Dick et al. Feb 2005 B1
6851803 Wooley et al. Feb 2005 B2
6884261 Zadno-Azizi et al. Apr 2005 B2
6923539 Simpson et al. Aug 2005 B2
6923540 Ye et al. Aug 2005 B2
6951391 Morris et al. Oct 2005 B2
6957891 Fiala Oct 2005 B2
6972032 Aharoni et al. Dec 2005 B2
6986578 Jones Jan 2006 B2
7025456 Morris et al. Apr 2006 B2
7036931 Lindacher et al. May 2006 B2
7048759 Bogaert et al. May 2006 B2
7048760 Cumming May 2006 B2
7061693 Zalevsky Jun 2006 B2
7073906 Portney Jul 2006 B1
7093938 Morris et al. Aug 2006 B2
7111938 Andino et al. Sep 2006 B2
7137702 Piers et al. Nov 2006 B2
7156516 Morris et al. Jan 2007 B2
7159983 Menezes et al. Jan 2007 B2
7188949 Bandhauer et al. Mar 2007 B2
7198640 Nguyen Apr 2007 B2
7217375 Lai May 2007 B2
7221513 Cho et al. May 2007 B2
7232218 Morris et al. Jun 2007 B2
7287852 Fiala Oct 2007 B2
7293873 Dai et al. Nov 2007 B2
7365917 Zalevsky Apr 2008 B2
7377640 Piers et al. May 2008 B2
7377641 Piers et al. May 2008 B2
7441894 Zhang et al. Oct 2008 B2
7455404 Bandhauer et al. Nov 2008 B2
7475986 Dai et al. Jan 2009 B2
7481532 Hong et al. Jan 2009 B2
7543937 Piers et al. Jun 2009 B2
7572007 Simpson Aug 2009 B2
7604350 Dursteler et al. Oct 2009 B2
7615073 Deacon et al. Nov 2009 B2
7654667 Blum et al. Feb 2010 B2
7670371 Piers et al. Mar 2010 B2
7677725 Piers et al. Mar 2010 B2
7717558 Hong et al. May 2010 B2
7753521 Wooley et al. Jul 2010 B2
7871162 Weeber Jan 2011 B2
7883207 Iyer et al. Feb 2011 B2
7896916 Piers et al. Mar 2011 B2
7922326 Bandhauer et al. Apr 2011 B2
7984990 Bandhauer et al. Jul 2011 B2
7998198 Angelopoulos et al. Aug 2011 B2
8128222 Portney Mar 2012 B2
8157374 Bandhauer et al. Apr 2012 B2
8192022 Zalevsky Jun 2012 B2
8197063 Iyer et al. Jun 2012 B2
8216307 Schaper, Jr. Jul 2012 B2
8231219 Weeber Jul 2012 B2
8231673 Sacharoff et al. Jul 2012 B2
8235525 Lesage et al. Aug 2012 B2
8240850 Apter et al. Aug 2012 B2
8262728 Zhang et al. Sep 2012 B2
8292953 Weeber et al. Oct 2012 B2
8382281 Weeber Feb 2013 B2
8388137 Dreher et al. Mar 2013 B2
8444267 Weeber et al. May 2013 B2
8480228 Weeber Jul 2013 B2
8500805 Kobayashi et al. Aug 2013 B2
8506075 Bandhauer et al. Aug 2013 B2
8529623 Piers et al. Sep 2013 B2
8556416 Lawu Oct 2013 B2
8556417 Das et al. Oct 2013 B2
8573775 Weeber Nov 2013 B2
8619362 Portney Dec 2013 B2
8636796 Houbrechts et al. Jan 2014 B2
8652205 Hong et al. Feb 2014 B2
8678583 Cohen Mar 2014 B2
8709079 Zhang et al. Apr 2014 B2
8734511 Weeber et al. May 2014 B2
8740978 Weeber et al. Jun 2014 B2
8747466 Weeber et al. Jun 2014 B2
8755117 Kobayashi et al. Jun 2014 B2
8771348 Zhao Jul 2014 B2
8827446 Iyer et al. Sep 2014 B2
8906089 Piers et al. Dec 2014 B2
9069185 Zhao Jun 2015 B2
9078745 Zhang et al. Jul 2015 B2
9122074 Piers et al. Sep 2015 B2
9164201 Fermigier et al. Oct 2015 B2
9223148 Fiala et al. Dec 2015 B2
9304329 Zhao Apr 2016 B2
9310624 Argal et al. Apr 2016 B2
9320594 Schwiegerling Apr 2016 B2
9329309 Van May 2016 B2
9335563 Weeber May 2016 B2
9335564 Choi et al. May 2016 B2
9370416 Argal et al. Jun 2016 B2
9518864 Grossinger et al. Dec 2016 B2
9563070 Ando et al. Feb 2017 B2
9622856 Weeber et al. Apr 2017 B2
9869580 Grossinger et al. Jan 2018 B2
9925041 Gerlach et al. Mar 2018 B2
20010018612 Carson et al. Aug 2001 A1
20020082690 Sarbadhikari Jun 2002 A1
20020093701 Zhang et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020118337 Perrott et al. Aug 2002 A1
20030014107 Reynard Jan 2003 A1
20030076478 Cox Apr 2003 A1
20030169491 Bender et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030171808 Phillips Sep 2003 A1
20040085515 Roffman et al. May 2004 A1
20040088050 Norrby et al. May 2004 A1
20040106992 Lang et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040111153 Woods et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040189981 Ross et al. Sep 2004 A1
20050096226 Stock et al. May 2005 A1
20050099589 Ishak May 2005 A1
20050128432 Altmann Jun 2005 A1
20050203619 Altmann Sep 2005 A1
20050259222 Kelch et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050267575 Nguyen et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060004446 Aharoni et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060009816 Fang et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060030938 Altmann Feb 2006 A1
20060066808 Blum et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060109421 Ye et al. May 2006 A1
20060116763 Simpson Jun 2006 A1
20060116764 Simpson Jun 2006 A1
20060139570 Blum et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060238702 Glick et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060244904 Hong et al. Nov 2006 A1
20070052920 Stewart et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070129803 Cumming et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070171362 Simpson et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070258143 Portney Nov 2007 A1
20070268451 Raghuprasad Nov 2007 A1
20070282438 Hong et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080147185 Hong et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080161913 Brady et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080161914 Brady et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080269891 Hong et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080273169 Blum et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080300679 Altmann Dec 2008 A1
20090062911 Bogaert Mar 2009 A1
20090088840 Simpson et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090164008 Hong et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090210054 Weeber et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090240328 Treushnikov et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090295295 Shannon et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090323020 Zhao et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100016961 Hong et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100057202 Bogaert Mar 2010 A1
20100087921 Simpson Apr 2010 A1
20100131060 Simpson et al. May 2010 A1
20100161051 Hong Jun 2010 A1
20100274233 Dick et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100281021 Weeber et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100312336 Hong et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110022170 Simpson et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110109874 Piers et al. May 2011 A1
20110125261 Portney May 2011 A1
20110149236 Weeber Jun 2011 A1
20110166652 Bogaert et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110270596 Weeber Nov 2011 A1
20110313522 Hayes Dec 2011 A1
20110313523 Hayes Dec 2011 A1
20110313525 Cumming Dec 2011 A1
20120059464 Zhao Mar 2012 A1
20120140166 Zhao Jun 2012 A1
20120143326 Canovas et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120154740 Bradley et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120170121 Okada et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120320335 Weeber et al. Dec 2012 A1
20120323321 Simonov et al. Dec 2012 A1
20130035760 Portney Feb 2013 A1
20130046381 Zalevsky et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130060330 Weeber et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130107202 Liang May 2013 A1
20150022775 Ando et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150029460 Bradley et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150094807 Piers et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150359625 Argal et al. Dec 2015 A1
20160216535 Zhao Jul 2016 A1
20160220350 Gerlach Aug 2016 A1
20160220352 Choi et al. Aug 2016 A1
20160320633 Weeber et al. Nov 2016 A1
20160334640 De, Jr. et al. Nov 2016 A1
20160341978 Schwiegerling Nov 2016 A1
20170209259 Choi et al. Jul 2017 A1
20170216020 Weeber et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170219846 Ando Aug 2017 A1
20170227789 Ando et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170239038 Choi et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170245985 Canovas et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170245986 Canovas Vidal et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170245987 Canovas et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170252151 Mackool Sep 2017 A1
20180092739 Pagnoulle et al. Apr 2018 A1
20180132996 Tiwari et al. May 2018 A1
20180147050 Choi et al. May 2018 A1
20180147052 Hong et al. May 2018 A1
20180275428 Ando Sep 2018 A1
20180368972 Rosen Dec 2018 A1
20180373060 Knox et al. Dec 2018 A1
20190224000 Choi et al. Jul 2019 A1
20190254810 Tiwari et al. Aug 2019 A1
20190307557 De Carvalho et al. Oct 2019 A1
20190314148 Liu Oct 2019 A1
20200038172 Hussain et al. Feb 2020 A1
20210294123 Weeber et al. Sep 2021 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (133)
Number Date Country
2005230194 Dec 2010 AU
2501217 Apr 2004 CA
2507659 Jun 2004 CA
2590085 Jun 2006 CA
1951340 Apr 2007 CN
104918580 Sep 2015 CN
108646434 Oct 2018 CN
335731 Oct 1989 EP
342895 Nov 1989 EP
0369561 May 1990 EP
375291 Jun 1990 EP
412751 Feb 1991 EP
0457553 Nov 1991 EP
470811 Feb 1992 EP
605841 Jul 1994 EP
0316162 Oct 1995 EP
355230 Oct 1995 EP
681198 Nov 1995 EP
0537643 Mar 1997 EP
949529 Oct 1999 EP
1376203 Jan 2004 EP
1862148 Dec 2007 EP
1310267 Jan 2008 EP
1891912 Feb 2008 EP
2043558 Apr 2009 EP
2045648 Apr 2009 EP
1402308 May 2009 EP
1424049 Jun 2009 EP
2103279 Sep 2009 EP
2113226 Nov 2009 EP
2365379 Sep 2011 EP
2377493 Oct 2011 EP
2378319 Oct 2011 EP
2290411 May 2012 EP
2363097 Sep 2012 EP
2812882 Dec 2014 EP
2813881 Dec 2014 EP
2349093 Oct 2015 EP
3179293 Jun 2017 EP
3150170 Dec 2017 EP
3415980 Dec 2018 EP
2527908 Mar 2019 EP
1215851 Feb 1990 IT
1154119 Jun 1989 JP
2028615 Jan 1990 JP
2079815 Mar 1990 JP
2137814 May 1990 JP
2249631 Oct 1990 JP
3011315 Jan 1991 JP
2013101323 May 2013 JP
101154066 Jun 2012 KR
9002963 Mar 1990 WO
9222264 Dec 1992 WO
9303409 Feb 1993 WO
9413225 Jun 1994 WO
9417435 Aug 1994 WO
9724639 Jul 1997 WO
9744689 Nov 1997 WO
9831299 Jul 1998 WO
9907309 Feb 1999 WO
9923526 May 1999 WO
0019906 Apr 2000 WO
0076426 Dec 2000 WO
0121061 Mar 2001 WO
0163344 Aug 2001 WO
0182839 Nov 2001 WO
0189424 Nov 2001 WO
0221194 Mar 2002 WO
0234158 May 2002 WO
02084381 Oct 2002 WO
02088830 Nov 2002 WO
03009053 Jan 2003 WO
2004013680 Feb 2004 WO
2004034129 Apr 2004 WO
2004049979 Jun 2004 WO
2004090611 Oct 2004 WO
2004096014 Nov 2004 WO
2004113959 Dec 2004 WO
05019906 Mar 2005 WO
06025726 Mar 2006 WO
2006047698 May 2006 WO
06060477 Jun 2006 WO
2006060480 Jun 2006 WO
2006067255 Jun 2006 WO
2007092948 Aug 2007 WO
2007133384 Nov 2007 WO
2008045847 Apr 2008 WO
2008150982 Dec 2008 WO
2009017403 Feb 2009 WO
2009027438 Mar 2009 WO
2009043985 Apr 2009 WO
2009058755 May 2009 WO
2009076670 Jun 2009 WO
2009130610 Oct 2009 WO
2009148454 Dec 2009 WO
2010046356 Apr 2010 WO
2010054255 May 2010 WO
2010059764 May 2010 WO
2010079528 Jul 2010 WO
2010093975 Aug 2010 WO
2010100523 Sep 2010 WO
2010104530 Sep 2010 WO
2010144315 Dec 2010 WO
2011024125 Mar 2011 WO
2011055228 May 2011 WO
2011075641 Jun 2011 WO
2011075668 Jun 2011 WO
2012004746 Jan 2012 WO
2012031211 Mar 2012 WO
2012070313 May 2012 WO
2012078763 Jun 2012 WO
2012085917 Jun 2012 WO
2012122411 Sep 2012 WO
2012140389 Oct 2012 WO
2013018379 Feb 2013 WO
2013028992 Feb 2013 WO
2013093916 Jun 2013 WO
2013114209 Aug 2013 WO
2013116133 Aug 2013 WO
2013118177 Aug 2013 WO
2013118499 Aug 2013 WO
2014008343 Jan 2014 WO
2014033543 Mar 2014 WO
2014091528 Jun 2014 WO
2014111831 Jul 2014 WO
2014189049 Nov 2014 WO
2017137841 Aug 2017 WO
2017149403 Sep 2017 WO
2018093873 May 2018 WO
2018150236 Aug 2018 WO
2019002384 Jan 2019 WO
2019130030 Jul 2019 WO
2020115104 Jun 2020 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (67)
Entry
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/EP2019/083615, dated Mar. 17, 2020, 14 pages.
Morlock, R., et al., “Patient-Reported Spectacle Independence Questionnaire (PRSIQ): Development and Validation,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, Jun. 2017, vol. 178, pp. 101-114.
Albert D.M., “(Book Review) Intraocular Lenses: Evolution, Designs, Complications, and Pathology, by David Apple et al.,” Archieves of Opthalmology, 1990, vol. 108, pp. 650.
Alfonso J.F., et al., “Prospective Study of the Acri.LISA Bifocal Intraocular Lens,” Journal of Cataract Refractive Surgery, Nov. 2007, vol. 33 (11), pp. 1930-1935.
Alvarez S. L. et al., “Spectral threshold: measurement and clinical applications,” British Journal of Ophthalmology, 1983, 67, 504-507.
Apple D. J., et al., Eds., “Intraocular Lenses: Evolution, Designs, Complications and Pathology,” in: New Concepts in Intraocular Lens Implantation, Williams & Wilkins publisher, Jan. 1989, vol. 22 (36), pp. 205-221.
Apple D.J., et al., Eds., “Intraocular Lenses: Evolution, Designs, Complications and Pathology,” in: New Concepts in Intraocular Lens Implantation, Williams & Wilkins publisher, Jan. 1989, vol. 36 (1), pp. 21-36.
Artal P., et al., “Contributions of the Cornea and the Lens to the Aberrations of the Human Eye,” Optics Letters, 1998, vol. 23 (21), pp. 1713-1715.
Atchinson D.A., “Design of Aspheric Intraocular Lens,” Ophthamic & Physiological Optics, 1991, vol. 11 (2), pp. 137-146.
Atchinson D.A., et al., “Optical Design of Intraocular Lenses. II. Off-Axis performance,” Optometry & Vision Science, 1989, vol. 66 (9), pp. 579-590.
Atchinson D.A., et al., “Third-Order Aberrations Of Pseudophakic Eyes,” Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 1989, vol. 9, pp. 205-211.
Atchinson D.A., “Optical Design of Intraocular Lenses. I. On-Axis Performance,” American Academy of Optometry, 1989, vol. 66 (8), pp. 492-506.
Atchinson D.A., “Optical design of intraocular lenses III. On-Axis Performance in the Presence of Lens Displacement,” American Academy of Optometry, 1989, vol. 66 (10), pp. 671-681.
Atchinson, “Refractive errors induced by displacement of intraocular lenses within the pseudophakic eye,” Optometry & Vision Science, 1989, 66 (3), 146-152.
Bonnet R., et al., “New Method Of Topographical Ophthalmometry—Its Theoretical And Clinical Applications,” American Journal of Optometry, 1962, vol. 39 (5), pp. 227-251.
Bradley A. et al., “Achromatizing the Human Eye” Optometry & Vision Science, 1991, vol. 68 (8), pp. 608-616.
Buralli D.A., et al., “Optical Performance Of Holographic Kinoforms,” Applied Optics, Mar. 1989, vol. 28 (5), pp. 976-983.
Canovas C., et al., “Hybrid Adaptive-Optics Visual Simulator,” Optical Letters, Jan. 15, 2010, vol. 35 (2), pp. 196-198.
Castignoles F., et al., “Comparison of the Efficiency, MTF and Chromatic Properties of Four Diffractive Bifocal Intraocular Lens Designs, ” Optics Express, Mar. 2010, vol. 18 (5), pp. 5245-5256.
Cohen A.L., “Diffractive Bifocal Lens Design,” Optometry and Vision Science, Jun. 1993, vol. 70 (6), pp. 461-468.
Cohen A.L., “Practical Design of a Bifocal Hologram Contact Lens or Intraocular Lens,” Applied Optics, Jul. 1, 1992, vol. 31 (19), pp. 3750-3754.
Diffractive Lenses for Extended Depth of Focus and Presbyopic Correction, Presentation from Wavefront Congress field on Feb. 15, 2008, Rochester, New York.
Doskolovich L.L., et al., “Special Diffractive Lenses,” Lens and Optical Systems Design, Apr. 1992, vol. 1780, pp. 393-402.
Dwyer W. O. et al., “Racial Differences In Color Vision: Do They Exist”, American Journal of Optometry & Physiological Optics, 1975, 52, 224-229.
El Hage S.G., et al., “Contribution of the Crystalline Lens to the Spherical Aberration of the Eye,” 1973, vol. 63 (2), pp. 205-211.
Futhey J.A., “Diffractive Bifocal Intraocular Lens,” SPIE, 1989, vol. 1052, pp. 142-148.
Geun Y., et al., “Visual Performance after Correcting the Monchromatic and Chromatic Aberrations of the Eye,” Journal of the Optical Society of America, 2002, vol. 19 (2), pp. 266-275.
Glasser A. et al., “Presbyopia and the optical changes in the human crystalline lens with age,” Vision Res, 1998, 38 (2), 209-229.
Greivenkamp J.E., et al., “Visual Acuity Modeling Using Optical Raytracing Of Schematic Eyes,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, 1995, vol. 120 (2), pp. 227-240.
Griswold Scott et al., “Scotopic Spectral Sensitivity of Phakic and Aphakic Observers Extending into the Near Ultraviolet,” Vision res, 1992, 32 (9), 1739-1743.
Guirao A., et al., “Corneal Wave Aberration from Videokeratography: Accuracy And Limitations of the Procedure,” Journal of the Optical Society of America, 2000, vol. 17 (6), pp. 955-965.
IOVS, 1999, 40 (4), S535.
Kiely et al., “The mean shape of the human cornea,” Optica ACTA, 1982, 29 (8), 1027-1040.
Kokoschka S., et al., “Influence of Field Size on the Spectral Sensitivity of the Eye in the Photopic and Mesopic Range,” American Journal of Optometry and Physiological Optics, 1985, vol. 62 (2), pp. 119-126.
Liang J., et al., “Objective Measurement Of Wave Aberrations Of The Human Eye With The Use Of A Hartmann-Shack Wave-Front Sensor,” Journal of the Optical Society of America, 1994, vol. 11 (7), pp. 1949-1957.
Lindsay R., et al., “Descriptors of Corneal Shape,” Optometry and Vision Science, 1998, vol. 75 (2), pp. 156-158.
Liou H.L., et al., “Anatomically Accurate, Finite Model Eye for Optical Modeling,” Journal of Optical Society of America, Aug. 1997, vol. 14 (8), pp. 1684-1695.
Lotmar, “Theoretical eye model with aspherics,” Journal of the Optical Society of America, 1971, 61 (11), 1522-1529.
Malacara D., et al., “Wavefront Fitting With Discrete Orthogonal Polynomials In a Unit Radius Circle,” Optical Engineering, 1990, vol. 29 (6), pp. 672-675.
Mandell R.B., et al., “Mathematical Model of the Corneal Contour,” 1965, School of Optometry, University of California, Berkeley, pp. 183-197.
Marcos S., et al., “A New Approach to the Study of Ocular Chromatic Aberrations,” Vision Research, 1999, vol. 39 (26), pp. 4309-4323.
Marsack J.D., et al., “Metrics of Optical Quality Derived from Wave Aberrations Predict Visual Performance,” Journal of Vision, Apr. 2004, vol. 4 (4), pp. 322-328.
Monsoriu J.A., et al., “Devil's Lenses,” Optics Express, Oct. 17, 2007, vol. 15 (21), pp. 13858-13864.
Mordi J.A., et al., “Influence of Age of Chromatic Aberration of the Human Eye,” American Journal of Optometry & Physiological Optics, 1985, vol. 62 (12), pp. 864-869.
Navarro R., et al., “Accommodation-Dependent Model of the Human Eye with Aspherics,” Journal of the Optical Society of America, Aug. 1985, vol. 2 (8), pp. 1273-1281.
Norrby S., et al., “Model Eyes for Evaluation of Intraocular Lenses,” Applied Optics, Sep. 7, 2007, vol. 46 (26), pp. 6595-6605.
“Optical Design,” Military Standardization Handbook, 1962, Chapter 4, U.S. Department of Defense MIL-HDBK-141, 4-1-4-19.
Oshika T., et al., “Changes in Corneal Wavefront Aberrations with Aging,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 1999, vol. 40 (7), pp. 1351-1355.
Patel S., et al., “Shape and Radius of Posterior Corneal Surface,” Refractive and Corneal Surgery, 1993, vol. 9 (3), pp. 173-181.
Piers P.A.., et al., “Eye Models for the Prediction of Contrast Vision in Patients with New Intraocular Lens Designs,” Optics Letters, Apr. 1, 2004, vol. 29 (7), pp. 733-735.
Piers P.A., et al., “Theoretical Comparison of Aberration-Correcting Customized and Aspheric Intraocular Lenses,” Journal of Refractive Surgery, Apr. 2007, vol. 23 (4), pp. 374-384.
Said et al., “The Variation with Age of the Spectral Transmissivity of the Living Human Crystalline Lens,” Gerontologia, 1959, 213-231.
Schwiegerling et al., “Representation of videokeratoscopic height data with Zemike polynomials,” Journal of the Optical Society of America, 1995, 12 (10), 2105-2113.
Seitz B., et al., “Corneal Topography,” Current Opinion in Ophthalmolgy, 1997, vol. 8 (4), pp. 8-24.
Siedlecki D., et al., “Radial Gradient index Intraocular Lens: a Theoretical Model,” Journal of Modern Optics, Feb. 20-Mar. 10, 2008, vol. 55 (4-5), pp. 639-647.
Smith G., et al., “The Spherical Aberration of the Crystalline Lens of the Human Eye,” Vision Res., 2001, vol. 41 (2), pp. 235-243.
Smith Kinney, “Sensitivity of the eye to spectral radiation at scotopic and mesopic intensity levels,” Journal of the Optical Society of America, 1955,45 (7), 507-514.
Sokołowski M., et al. “Hybrid Heptafocal Intraocular Lenses, ” Optica Applicata, Dec. 2015, vol. 45 (3), pp. 285-298.
Terwee T., et al., “Visualization of the Retinal Image in an Eye Model With Spherical and Aspheric, Diffractive, and Refractive Multifocal Intraocular Lenses,” Journal of Refractive Surgery, Mar. 2008, vol. 24 (3), pp. 223-232.
Thibos L. N. et al., “The chromatic eye: a new reduced-eye model of ocular chromatic aberration in humans,” Applied Optics, 1992, 31 (19), 3594-3600.
Thibos L. N. et al., “Theork and measurement of ocular chromatic aberration,” Vision Res, 1988, 30 (1), 33-49.
Townsley, “New Knowledge of the corneal contour,” Contacto, 1970, pp. 38-43.
Van Den Berg T.J., “Analysis of Intraocular Straylight, Especially in Relation to Age,” Optometry and Vision Science, Feb. 1995, vol. 72 (2), pp. 52-59.
Van Meeteren A., “Calculations on the Optical Modulation Transfer Function of the Human Eye for White Light,” Optica Acta, May 1974, vol. 21 (5), pp. 395-412.
Verriest G., “The Spectral Curve of Relative Luminous Efficiency in Different Age Groups of Aphakic Eyes,” Mod Probl Ophthalmol., 1974, 13, 314-317.
Villegas E.A., et al., “Correlation between Optical and Psychophy, Sical Parameters as a Function of Defocus,” Optometry and Vision Science, Jan. 1, 2002, vol. 79 (1), pp. 60-67.
Wang J.Y., et al., “Wave-Front Interpretation With Zemike Polynomials,” Applied Optics, 1980, vol. 19 (9), pp. 1510-1518.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20210196452 A1 Jul 2021 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62955355 Dec 2019 US