The polymerization of olefins often uses comonomers to affect the final properties, such as density, crystallinity, and the like. The comonomers are generally alpha-olefins, such as 1-butene, 1-hexene, and 1-octene, among others. Alpha-olefins are also important feedstocks for numerous other products, including additives for drilling fluids, lubricants, synthetic oils, plasticizers, and other products.
One of the most important alpha-olefins is 1-butene. The market size projection for 1-butene has been projected to pass four billion USD in 2021. Satisfying the projected demand for 1-butene through the currently used method of ethylene dimerization may be impractical due to costs and its competitive use in polyethylene.
An embodiment described in examples herein provides a method for using an acid modified red mud (AMRM) catalyst for olefin isomerization. The method includes forming the AMRM catalyst by dissolving red mud in water to form a red mud solution, neutralizing the red mud solution with an acid, and forming a precipitant by adding a base to the red mud solution. The precipitant is filtered from the red mud solution, dried, and ground to form particles of less than 100 μm. The particles are calcined to form the AMRM catalyst. A butene feedstock is flowed over the AMRM catalyst in an isomerization reactor. 1-Butene is separated from a reactor effluent.
Another embodiment described in examples herein provides a method of making an acid modified red mud (AMRM) catalyst for olefin isomerization. The method includes dissolving red mud in water to form a red mud solution and neutralizing the red mud solution with an acid. A precipitant is formed by adding a base to the red mud solution and the precipitant is filtered from the red mud solution. The precipitant is dried, calcined, and ground to form the AMRM catalyst with a particle size of less than about 100 μm.
Another embodiment described in examples herein provides an isomerization unit for producing a 1-butene product stream from a butene feedstock. The isomerization unit includes an upstream purification system to separate a feed stream that includes trans-2-butene and cis-2-butene from an initial feedstock, generating the butene feedstock. The isomerization unit further includes a reactor including an acid modified red mud (AMRM) catalyst to isomerize the trans-2-butene and cis-2-butene to form 1-butene, and a product purification system to isolate the 1-butene product stream from an effluent from the reactor.
Alpha olefins used as comonomers for polymerization, such as 1-butene, 1-hexene, and 1-octene, may be produced by the isomerization of secondary olefins, for example, isolated from refinery feed streams. For example, one method for the production of 1-butene is the isomerization of 2-butene, which is an available material in refinery feed streams. The isomerization proceeds with aid of catalysts, such as SiO2, TiCl3, organo-aluminum, or zinc chromium ferrite (ZnxCryFezO4), acidized clay, alumina, or MgO catalysts, among others. However, improvements in cost, durability, selectivity, and efficiency of catalysts are desirable.
Red mud is a waste product generated during alumina production in the Bayer process, which is responsible for more than 95% of all alumina produced in the world. In this process, each ton of aluminum oxide that is produced results in 0.3 to 2.5 tons of bauxite tailings, or red mud. Consequently, about 155 million tons of red mud are created annually with worldwide storage at over 3.5 billion tons in 2014. Accordingly, red mud is a low cost material that is in high supply. Although red mud has significant heterogeneity, the generic composition is shown in Table 1. The complex mixture of metals indicates that red mud and modified red muds may be effective catalysts for the isomerization of olefins, such as 2-butene to 1-butene.
Methods for the use of acid modified red mud (AMRM) as a catalyst for olefin isomerization are described herein. The acid modification of the red mud increases the surface area of the red mud substantially. In one example, the surface area increased from about 16 m2/g to about 142 m2/g. For this reason, the AMRM catalyst shows a substantial increase in performance of over unmodified red mud used as a catalyst. Further, the metals content of the AMRM catalyst provides improved performance over other isomerization catalysts, such as SiO2 and MgO.
In embodiments described in examples herein, an AMRM catalyst is used to isomerize the 2-butene isomers 102 and 104 to produce 1-butene. This takes advantage of the mixture of metals constituting red mud, which include Ti, Fe, and Al. The mixture of the metal compounds in the red mud may enhance the isomerization yield and selectivity, for example, as compared to MgO or SiO2 catalysts. Further, red mud is a waste material of negligible cost, which improves the competitive advantage over synthesized catalysts containing MgO or SiO2.
Accordingly, even at comparable rates of isomerization yield and selectivity, and including the cost of the acid modification, the low cost of the red mud makes the use of the AMRM catalyst favorable over higher cost catalysts. Further, the acid modification improves the performance of the AMRM catalyst over an unmodified red mud catalyst.
At block 204, the AMRM catalyst, for example, prepared by the procedure of
At block 206, the 2-butene feedstock is flowed into the reactor for isomerization into the 1-butene. In some embodiments described herein, the 2-butene feedstock is a mixture of cis-2-butene and trans-2-butene, for example, at a 50-50 ratio. In various embodiments, such as in commercial usage, the 2-butene feedstock is a refinery stream that includes a number of hydrocarbons with boiling points in a range. For example, the 2-butene feedstock may be a light fraction from a hydrocracking unit, having a boiling point range of about −30° C. to about 40° C., about −20° C. to about 10° C., or about −10° C. to about 0° C. A narrower range of boiling points may be indicative of a feedstock that is higher in cis-2-butene and trans-2-butene, providing a higher purity 1-butene product stream, and decreasing the purification required before sales. The butene feedstock is flowed through the reactor at a weight-hour space velocity (WHSV) (hr−1) of between about 400 hr−1 and about 1400 hr−1, or between about 650 hr−1 and about 1150 hr−1, or about 900 hr−1.
At block 208, the 1-butene product is separated from the reactor effluent. The 1-butene may then be provided to other processes, such as polymerization of polyolefins. At block 210, the separated effluent, for example, including unreacted 2-butene, may be recycled to the reactor to increase yields. The separated effluent may be sent to purification systems upstream of the reactor to remove other hydrocarbons or may be provided directly to the reactor, for example, by being mixed with the initial feedstock.
At block 304, the red mud solution is neutralized with acid. For example, as formed, the red mud solution may have a pH of greater than about 10 or greater than about 8. The acid is added to bring the pH to about 7, or about 6, or about 5, or less. Lowering the pH enhances the solubility and homogeneity of the red mud solution. In some embodiments, the acid solution is diluted hydrochloric acid, for example, a 2 wt. % hydrochloric acid solution, a 4 wt. % hydrochloric acid solution, or a 10 wt. % hydrochloric acid solution.
At block 306, the neutralized red mud solution is stirred at an elevated temperature over a period of time to complete the dissolution. For example, the red mud solution may be heated to a temperature of between about 40° C. and about 100° C., or a temperature of between about 50° C. and about 70° C., or to a temperature of about 60° C. The red mud solution may be stirred at the elevated temperature for greater than about 1 hour, greater than about 2 hours, or for about 3 hours or greater.
At block 308, a base is slowly added to the red mud solution to form a precipitant. In some embodiments, the base is ammonium hydroxide. In some embodiments, the base is sodium hydroxide or potassium hydroxide, among others. As noted herein, though, the presence of other ions, such as sodium or potassium ions, may affect the catalyst activity. The base is added while stirring until the pH reaches about 8. At block 310, the precipitant is filtered from the red mud solution. For example, the filtration may be performed using a vacuum filtration apparatus at lab or commercial scales.
At block 312, the precipitant is dried. This may be performed, for example, at a temperature of greater than 60° C., or greater than 80° C., or greater than 100° C. The drying may be conducted under a vacuum or may be performed under ambient atmospheric conditions. The drying is performed for greater than 4 hours, greater than 8 hours, or greater than 12 hours, for example, depending on the temperature and atmospheric conditions.
At block 314, the precipitant is calcined. In various embodiments, the calcination is performed at a temperature of greater than about 400° C., or at a temperature of greater than about 500° C., or at a temperature equal to or greater than about 600° C. In various embodiments, the calcination is performed for a period of time greater than about 1 hour, greater than about 2 hours, greater than about 4 hours, or greater than about 8 hours.
At block 316, the calcined precipitant is ground to form fine particles of the final AMRM catalyst. In various embodiments, the particle size is less than about 100 μm, less than about 90 μm, less than about 80 μm, less than about 70 μm, less than about 60 μm, or smaller. The particle size may be chosen to fit the reactor and reaction conditions, for example, a fixed bed reactor may use a larger particle size while a flowing bed reactor or a fluidized bed reactor may use a smaller particle size.
In commercial usage, the catalyst may be dried and activated at a remote production facility, before being brought to the isomerization unit and loaded into the reactor. Any number of combinations of this may be performed. For example, the catalyst may be dried at the remote production facility and activated after being loaded into the commercial isomerization reactor.
The initial feedstock 408 is fed to the upstream purification system 402. In various embodiments, the upstream purification system 402 includes a distillation column, a cryogenic distillation column, a flash vessel, and the like. Other streams (not shown), having different boiling point ranges, are separated out in the upstream purification system 402 and sent to another processing units. An isomerization feedstock stream 410, for example, having a boiling point range that includes trans-2-butene and cis-2-butene, is provided to the reactor 404.
In the reactor 404, the isomerization feedstock stream 410 is flowed over the red mud, which catalyzes the isomerization reaction of at least a portion of the 2-butene feedstocks to a 1-butene product. A reactor effluent stream 412 is then provided to the product purification system 406. In some embodiments, the reactor 404 is a standard isomerization reactor used in a refinery.
In the product purification system 406, the 1-butene product is separated and provided as a product stream 414. In various embodiments, the product purification system 406 includes a distillation column, a cryogenic distillation column, a flash vessel, and the like. The product stream 414 may be sold to polyolefin manufacturers, used in other processes to form other products, and the like. Other streams (not shown) from the product purification system 406 may be sent to other processing units. In some implementations, a recycle stream 416 is returned from the product purification system 406 to the upstream purification system 402 after removal of the 1-butene product. This may be performed to allow the recovery of unreacted trans-2-butene and cis-2-butene to increase the overall yield of the process. In other implementations, the recycle stream 416 is combined with the isomerization feedstock stream 410 directly, and fed to the reactor 404.
Formation of the AMRM Catalyst
Acid modified red mud catalyst was prepared using a homogeneous precipitation process. First, a red mud solution was formed by dissolving 10 g of dry red mud in 100 ml deionized water. The red mud solution was ultrasonicated for 3 min, and then it was neutralized by adding 40.5 ml of 37% hydrochloric acid mixed with 359.5 ml of deionized water.
The resulting solution was heated at 60° C. in a water bath and magnetically stirred for 3 hours. After that, a precipitant was formed from the solution by slowly adding aqueous ammonia (around 30 ml of NH4OH) while stirring until the pH reached 8. After that, the solution was filtered to isolate the precipitant, which was dried in an oven at 105° C. overnight and calcined at 600° C. for 4 hours. The final product was ground to have particle size less than 70 μm.
Characterization of AMRM Catalyst
The surface area of the AMRM catalyst, the total pore volume, and the pore size were measured using a Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) technique. These measurements may be performed, for example, using the procedures in the ISO 9277 standard, “Determination of the specific surface area of solids by gas adsorption—BET method,” Second Edition, 1 Sep. 2010. The BET results of the AMRM catalyst compared with unmodified RM are shown in Table 1.
Elemental analyses were performed by X-ray Fluorescence (XRF) analysis. The XRF analysis was performed on a Horiba® XGT-7200. The X-ray tube is equipped with an Rh target, voltage was set at 30 kV, no X-ray filter was used, and analysis preset time was 400 s. Before measurement, samples were placed on a double-sized tape (NICETACK™, Prod. No NW-15) and then placed in the chamber, which was then degassed. The results are an average of four measurements were taken.
The composition of Saudi Arabian red mud is shown in Table 2 along with the composition of the acid modified red mud (AMRM). The red mud composition listed in Table 2 is the comprehensive composition, which includes both major and minor constituents. The mixture of metals is thought to grant red mud a performance advantage over other isomerization catalysts, especially MgO and SiO2.
Comparative Catalyst Tests
The performance of an acid modified Saudi Arabian red mud sample in the isomerization of a mixture of trans-2-butene and cis-2-butene to 1-butene was evaluated at different temperatures, 450° C., 500° C., and 550° C. As red mud is a waste material, the composition is heterogeneous, with a 5%, or higher, variation in the composition. The variations in composition do not substantially affect the products or selectivity.
The results of the isomerization were compared to MgO and SiO2 commercial catalysts, as well as to an unmodified Saudi Arabian red mud (RM) catalyst. The experimental runs were performed in a BTRS reactor unit from Autoclave Engineers division of Parker Hannifin Corp, having 9 mm ID and 30 cm length. The reactor is a stainless steel reactor with four different MFC units to control the flowing gases. The maximum temperature of the reactor system is 800° C. and the maximum pressure is 20 bar. The amount of catalyst used in each run was 2 mL (0.65 g).
Prior to evaluation, each catalyst sample was calcined under air at 650° C. to remove moisture or volatile gases, if present. The catalyst sample was then activated at 550° C. inside the reactor for 4 hrs under nitrogen. The 2-butene feed is a mixture of 50% cis-2-butene and 50% trans-2-butene. The concentration of 2-butene employed in the evaluation was 15% (5 ml) diluted with N2 (25 ml).
The amounts of hydrocarbons in the reactor effluent streams were measured by gas chromatography. This was performed using an Agilent GC-7890B instrument from Agilent. The column was a capillary column (HP-Al/KCL (50 mm×0.53 mm×15 μm) with an N2 stationary phase and He carrier gas. A hybrid detector including a flame ionization detector (FID) and a thermal conductivity detector (TCD) was used. The flow rate of the carrier gas was 15 ml/min. After injection, the temperature was ramped from 50° C. to 170° C. over a time span of 10 min., then the temperature was held at 220° C. for 15 min., before being cooled to the starting temperature.
From the GC results, yields and selectivities were calculated by the following formulas:
In these formulas, yield represents the yield of 1-butene as obtained through the GC Retention Factor. The conversion of 2-butene (cis and trans 2-butene) is also obtained though GC retention factor.
As described herein, red mud was modified with acid, substantially increasing its surface area from 16 m2/g to 142 m2/g. The increased surface area, among other factors, increased the isomerization yield by 140% for 1-butene production from 2-butene, when compared to unmodified red mud. In addition, the proposed red mud modification enhanced the 2-butene isomerization yield by 66% and 733%, when compared to the commercially utilized catalysts of MgO and SiO2, respectively. The yield increase took place at 450° C. as illustrated in
An embodiment described in examples herein provides a method for using an acid modified red mud (AMRM) catalyst for olefin isomerization. The method includes forming the AMRM catalyst by dissolving red mud in water to form a red mud solution, neutralizing the red mud solution with an acid, and forming a precipitant by adding a base to the red mud solution. The precipitant is filtered from the red mud solution, dried, and ground to form particles of less than 100 μm. The particles are calcined to form the AMRM catalyst. A butene feedstock is flowed over the AMRM catalyst in an isomerization reactor. 1-Butene is separated from a reactor effluent.
In an aspect, the method further includes calcining the AMRM catalyst to activate the AMRM catalyst at a temperature of between about 400° C. and about 700° C. for between about 2 hours and about 6 hours. In an aspect, the method further includes calcining the AMRM catalyst to activate the AMRM catalyst at a temperature of between about 500° C. and about 600° C. for between about 3 hours and about 5 hours. In an aspect, the method further includes calcining the AMRM catalyst to activate the AMRM catalyst at a temperature of about 550° C. for about 4 hours.
In an aspect, the butene feedstock is obtained from an upstream purification system in a refinery. In an aspect, the butene feedstock is obtained with a boiling point range of between about −30° C. and about 40° C. In an aspect, the butene feedstock is obtained with a boiling point range of between about −20° C. and about 10° C. In an aspect, the butene feedstock is obtained with a boiling point range of between about −10° C. and about 0° C.
In an aspect, the butene feedstock is flowed over the AMRM catalyst at a weight-hour space velocity of between about 400 hr−1 and 1300 hr−1. In an aspect, the butene feedstock is flowed over the AMRM catalyst at a weight-hour space velocity of between about 650 hr−1 and 1150 hr−1. In an aspect, the butene feedstock is flowed over the AMRM catalyst at a weight-hour space velocity of about 900 hr−1.
In an aspect, the 1-butene is separated from the reactor effluent in a distillation column. In an aspect, the reactor effluent is returned to an upstream purification system after removal of the 1-butene from the reactor effluent. In an aspect, the reactor effluent is combined with the butene feedstock after separating the 1-butene from the reactor effluent.
Another embodiment described in examples herein provides a method of making an acid modified red mud (AMRM) catalyst for olefin isomerization. The method includes dissolving red mud in water to form a red mud solution and neutralizing the red mud solution with an acid. A precipitant is formed by adding a base to the red mud solution and the precipitant is filtered from the red mud solution. The precipitant is dried, calcined, and ground to form the AMRM catalyst with a particle size of less than about 100 μm.
In an aspect, the red mud is dissolved in the water at a concentration of about 10 wt. %. In an aspect, the acid is added until the pH of the red mud solution is less than about 7. In an aspect, the base is added until the pH of the red mud solution is greater than about 8. In an aspect, the precipitant is dried at a temperature of greater than about 100° C. for a least about 8 hours.
In an aspect, the precipitant is calcined at a temperature of between about 500° C. and about 800° C. for between about 2 hours and about 6 hours. In an aspect, the precipitant is calcined at a temperature of between about 600° C. and about 700° C. for between about 3 hours and about 5 hours. In an aspect, the precipitant is calcined at a temperature of about 600° C. for about 4 hours.
Another embodiment described in examples herein provides an isomerization unit for producing a 1-butene product stream from a butene feedstock. The isomerization unit includes an upstream purification system to separate a feed stream that includes trans-2-butene and cis-2-butene from an initial feedstock, generating the butene feedstock. The isomerization unit further includes a reactor including an acid modified red mud (AMRM) catalyst to isomerize the trans-2-butene and cis-2-butene to form 1-butene, and a product purification system to isolate the 1-butene product stream from an effluent from the reactor.
In an aspect, the butene feedstock has a boiling point range of about −20° C. to about 10° C. In an aspect, the product purification system includes a distillation column configured to recycle the effluent to the upstream purification system, after removal of the 1-butene product stream.
Other implementations are also within the scope of the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
106836 | Kuhlmann | Aug 1870 | A |
665346 | Reed | Jan 1901 | A |
701987 | Alz | Jun 1902 | A |
978576 | Goodell | Dec 1910 | A |
2378905 | Bates | Jun 1945 | A |
2614066 | Cornell | Oct 1952 | A |
2910426 | Gluesenkamp | Oct 1959 | A |
3288692 | Leduc | Nov 1966 | A |
3409540 | Gould et al. | Nov 1968 | A |
3427235 | Leduc | Feb 1969 | A |
3527834 | Kehl et al. | Sep 1970 | A |
3533938 | Leas | Oct 1970 | A |
3585217 | Titzenthaler | Jun 1971 | A |
3632497 | Leduc | Jan 1972 | A |
3702292 | Burich | Nov 1972 | A |
3726789 | Kovach | Apr 1973 | A |
3755143 | Hosoi et al. | Aug 1973 | A |
3856659 | Owen | Dec 1974 | A |
3894059 | Selvaratnam | Jul 1975 | A |
4064062 | Yurko | Dec 1977 | A |
4090949 | Owen et al. | May 1978 | A |
4119507 | Simmrock et al. | Oct 1978 | A |
4134824 | Kamm et al. | Jan 1979 | A |
4230551 | Salyer et al. | Oct 1980 | A |
4264435 | Read et al. | Apr 1981 | A |
4297203 | Ford et al. | Oct 1981 | A |
4310501 | Reh et al. | Jan 1982 | A |
4332663 | Berneke | Jun 1982 | A |
4426276 | Dean et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
4434031 | Horowitz et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
4522802 | Setzer et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4527003 | Okamoto et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4560451 | Nielsen | Dec 1985 | A |
4587011 | Okamoto et al. | May 1986 | A |
4602986 | Ellis et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4655904 | Okamoto et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4725349 | Okamoto et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4735728 | Wemhoff | Apr 1988 | A |
4761394 | Lauritzen | Aug 1988 | A |
4786400 | Farnsworth | Nov 1988 | A |
4830728 | Herbat et al. | May 1989 | A |
4992160 | Long et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5012360 | Yamauchi et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5091351 | Murakawa et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5108581 | Aldridge | Apr 1992 | A |
5527436 | Cooker et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5601937 | Isenberg | Feb 1997 | A |
5624493 | Wagh et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5904837 | Fujiyama | May 1999 | A |
5906728 | Iaccino et al. | May 1999 | A |
5951850 | Ino et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6033555 | Chen et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6084142 | Yao et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6190533 | Bradow et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6210562 | Xie et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6280593 | Wiese et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6293979 | Choudhary et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6312658 | Hufton et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6319864 | Hannigan et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6336791 | O'Toole | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6531515 | Moore, Jr. et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6656346 | Ino et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6743961 | Powers | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6849356 | Dow et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6852901 | Hasenberg et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6979757 | Powers | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7019187 | Powers | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7045554 | Raje et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7132042 | Genetti et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7302795 | Vetrovec | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7374664 | Powers | May 2008 | B2 |
7378561 | Olah et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7396449 | Powers | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7404889 | Powers | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7419584 | Stell et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7460333 | Akamatsu et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7550642 | Powers | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7592290 | Hussain et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7642292 | Severinsky | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7744747 | Halsey | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7858834 | Powers | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7906559 | Olah et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7972498 | Buchanan et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7973087 | Kibby et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8152973 | Yamamoto et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8198338 | Shulenberger et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8287716 | Al-Sadah | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8303917 | Miyashiro et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8304567 | Kadota et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8628668 | Simonson | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8816137 | Olah et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8845940 | Niven et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8951333 | Cabourdin et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9085497 | Jennings | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9090543 | Schoedel et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9096806 | Abba et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9175409 | Sivasankar et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9221027 | Kuppler et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9242230 | Moon et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9255230 | Shafi et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9260366 | Verhaak et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9279088 | Shafi et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9284497 | Bourane et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9284502 | Bourane et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9296961 | Shafi et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9303323 | DiMascio et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9312454 | Itoh et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9328035 | Kuhn et al. | May 2016 | B1 |
9435404 | Goleski et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9555367 | Masel et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9559375 | Savinell et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9618264 | Berdut-Teruel | Apr 2017 | B1 |
9634343 | Munier et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9675979 | Hassell | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9752080 | Christensen et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9884313 | Shen et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9963392 | Deo et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
9970804 | Khousa et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
9973141 | Hammad et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
10179733 | Becker et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10252243 | Fadhel et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10252909 | Lofberg et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10329676 | Kaczur et al. | Jun 2019 | B2 |
10357759 | D'Souza et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10422754 | Al Hosani et al. | Sep 2019 | B2 |
20030233018 | Brown et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20050211603 | Guillaume et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060171065 | Akamatsu et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20080011644 | Dean | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080011645 | Dean | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080083648 | Bishop et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080194900 | Bhirud | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080277314 | Halsey | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080283445 | Powers | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090050523 | Halsey | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20100089795 | Fujiyama et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100137458 | Erling | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20110021858 | Ramachandran et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110083996 | Shafi et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110132770 | Sala et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110247500 | Akhras et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20130129610 | Kale | May 2013 | A1 |
20130220884 | Bourane et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130233766 | Shafi et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130248419 | Abba | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20150225295 | Mcandlish et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150337445 | Hasegawa et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150343416 | Fadhel et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160002035 | Ralston et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160264886 | Davydov | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160333487 | Rodriguez | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20170050845 | Lofberg et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170292197 | Lei et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20180057423 | Kimura et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20190194074 | Amr et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20210387929 | Fadhel et al. | Dec 2021 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2938299 | May 2015 | CA |
104923234 | Dec 2017 | CN |
111450841 | Jul 2020 | CN |
102006020843 | Nov 2007 | DE |
2000009633 | Feb 2000 | WO |
2009073436 | Jun 2009 | WO |
2010009077 | Jan 2010 | WO |
2010009082 | Jan 2010 | WO |
2010009089 | Jan 2010 | WO |
2010143783 | Dec 2010 | WO |
2015128045 | Sep 2013 | WO |
2014160168 | Oct 2014 | WO |
2015183200 | Dec 2015 | WO |
2016207892 | Dec 2016 | WO |
2019112555 | Jun 2019 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Sushil et al. (“Modification of red mud by acid treatment and its application for CO removal.” Journal of Hazardous Materials 203-204 (2012) 264-273) (Year: 2012). |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Appln. No. PCT/US2022/011194, dated Apr. 22, 2022, 12 pages. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Appln. No. PCT/US2021/036161, dated Sep. 9, 2021, 13 pages. |
Sushil et al., “Catalytic applications of red mud, an aluminium industry waste: A review,” Applied Catalysis B. Environmental, May 2008, 81(1-2): 64-77, 14 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/899,254, filed Jun. 11, 2020, Fadhel et al. |
Albrecht et al., “Unexpectedly efficient CO2 hydrogenation to higher hydrocarbons over non-doped Fe2O3,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 204: 119-126, May 2017, 8 pages. |
Bhuiyan, “Metathesis of Butene to Produce Propylene over Mesoporous Tungsten Oxide Catalyst: Synthesis, Characterization and Kinetic Modeling,” A Thesis Presented to the Deanship of Graduate Studies, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Chemical Engineering, Jun. 2013, 188 pages. |
Chew et al., “Effect of nitrogen doping on the reducibility, activity and selectivity of carbon nanotube-supported iron catalysts applied in CO2 hydrogenation,” Applied Catalysis A: General 482: 163-170, Jul. 2014, 29 pages. |
Choi et al., “Carbon dioxide Fischer-Tropsch synthesis: A new path to carbon-neutral fuels,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 202: 605-610, Mar. 2017, 6 pages. |
Choi et al., “Hydrogenation of carbon dioxide over alumina supported Fe—K catalysts,” Catalysis Letters 40: 115-118, Mar. 1996, 4 pages. |
Cowie et al., “Naturally occurring radioactive material and naturally occurring mercury assessment of black powder in sales gas pipelines,” Radiation Protection and Environment 42: 34-9, Jan.-Mar. & Apr.-Jun. 2019, 6 pages. |
Cramer et al., “The Mechanism of Isomerization of Olefins with transition metal catalysts,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, 88(15): 3534-3544, Aug. 5, 1966, 11 pages. |
Dinesh et al., “Iron-based flow batteries to store renewable energies,” Environmental Chemistry Letters, Feb. 2018, 12 pages. |
Ding et al., “CO2 Hydrogenation to Hydrocarbons over Iron-Based Catalyst: Effects of Physico-Chemical Properties of A12O3 Supports,” I&EC Research, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 53(45): 17563-17569, Oct. 2014, 30 pages. |
Du et al., “Sodium Hydroxide Production from Seawater Desalination Brine: Process Design and Energy Efficiency,” Environmental Science & Technology 52: 5949-5958, 2018, 10 pages. |
Fang et al., “A Nanomesoporous Catalyst from Modifier Red Mud and Its Application for Methane Decomposition to Hydrogran Production,” Article ID 6947636, Hindawi Publishing Corporation, Journal of Nanomaterials, 2016, 8 pages. |
Godoy et al., “210Pb content in natural gas pipeline residues (“black-powder”) and its correlation with the chemical composition,” Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 83: 101-111, 2005, 12 pages. |
Grafe et al., “Bauxite residue issues: IV. Old obstacles and new pathways for in situ residue bioremediation,” Hydrometallurgy 108: 46-59, 2011, 14 pages. |
Hu et al., “Hydrothermally stable MOFs for CO2 hydrogenation over iron-based catalyst to light olefins,” Journal of CO2 Utilization, 15: 89-95, 2016, 7 pages. |
Hua et al., “Transformation of 2-Butene into Propene on WO3/MCM-48: Metathesis and Isomerization of n-Butene,” Catalysts 8: 585, 2018, 11 pages. |
Kurtoglu and Uzun, “Red Mud as an Efficient, Stable, and Cost-Free Catalyst for Cox-Free Hydrogren Production from Ammonia,” Scientific Reports, 6:32279, 2016, 8 pages. |
Lee et al., “Selective Positional Isomerization of 2-Butene over Alumina and La-promoted Alumina Catalysts,” J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 13(7): 1062-1066, Dec. 2007, 5 pages. |
Life-greenlysis.eu [online], “Hydrogen and Oxygen production via electrolysis powered by renewable energies to reduce environmental footprint of a WWTP.,” Greenlysis, URL <www.life-greenlysis.eu>, 2010-2012, 16 pages. |
Liu et al. “Fe—MOF-derived highly active catalysts for carbon dioxide hydrogenation to valuable hydrocarbons,” Journal of CO2 Utilization 21:100-107, Oct. 2017, 8 pages. |
Liu et al., “Preparation of Modified Red Mud-Supported Fe Catalysts for Hydrogran Production by Catalytic Methane Decomposition,” Article ID 8623463, Hindawi, Journal of Nanomaterials, 2017, 11 pages. |
Liu et al., “Pyrolyzing ZIF-8 to N-doped porous carbon facilitated by iron and potassium for CO2 hydrogenation to value-added hydrocarbons,” Journal of CO2 Utilization 25: 120-127, May 2018, 8 pages. |
Madadkhani, “Red mud as an Ironbased Catalyst for Catalytic Cracking of Naphthalene,” a Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree of Master of Applied Science in the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies (Chemical and Biological Engineering), The University of British Columbia, Dec. 2016, 192 pages. |
Morrison, “Cis-trans Isomerization of Olefins by Intramolecular Energy Transfer,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 87(4): 932, Feb. 1965, 1 page. |
Naik et al. “Carbon Dioxide sequestration in cementitious products,” Report No. CNU-2009-02, REP-640, Department of Civil Engineering and Mechanics, College of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Jan. 2009, 53 pages. |
Nam et al., “Catalytic conversion of carbon dioxide into hydrocarbons over iron supported on alkali ion-exchanged Y-zeolite catalysts,” Applied Catalysis A: General 179: 155-163, Apr. 1999, 9 pages. |
Nam et al., “Catalytic Conversion of Carbon dioxide into hyrdrocarbons over zinc promoted iron catalysts,” Energy onvers. Manage. 38: S397-S402, 1997, 6 pages. |
Ndlela et al., “Reducibility of Potassium-Promoted Iron Oxide under Hydrogen Conditions,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 42: 2112-2121, 2003, 10 pages. |
Numpilai et al., “Pore size effects on physicochemical properties of Fe—Co/K—A12O3 catalysts and their catalytic activity in CO2 hydrogenation to light olefins,” Applied Surface Science 483: 581-592, Jul. 2019, 12 pages. |
Pall.com [online], “Cyclo-Filter System,” retrieved from URL <https://www.pall.com/en/oil-gas/midstream/midstream-black-powder.html>, retrieved on Jun. 16, 2020, available on or before 2020, 4 pages. |
Pavlov et al., “Processes of Synthesis of 1-Butene from 2-Butene by the Positional Isomerization on Sulfocation Exchangers,” Russian Journal of Applied Chemistry, 82:6, 2009, 1117-1122, 6 pages. |
Ramirez et al., “Metal Organic Framework—Derived Iron Catalysts for the Direct Hydrogenation of CO2 to Short Chain Olefins,” ACS Catalysis 8:9174-9182, 2018, 32 pages. |
Researchandmarkets.com [online], “Global 1 Butene Demand—Supply and Price Analysis,” 2002-2021, retrieved on Jan. 26, 2021, retrieved from URL <https://www.researchandmarkets.com/reports/3752113/global-1-butene-demand-supply-and-price-analysis>, 1 page. |
Russkikh et al. “Turning Waste into Value: Potassium-Promoted Red Mud as an Effective Catalyst for the Hydrogenation of CO2,” ChemSusChem 13.11, 2020,2981-2987, 7 pages. |
Russkikh et al., “Red mud as an efficient catalyst in turning CO2 hydrogenation,” Chemical Science Seminar, retrieved from URL: <https://pse.kaust.edu.sa/events/red-mud-as-an-efficient-catalyst-in-turning-co2-hydrogenationinto-useful-products>, Oct. 13, 2019, KAUST, 2019, 1 page, (abstract only). |
Shop.pall.com (online), “Black Powder Filter,” retrieved from URL <https://shop.pall.com/us/en/search?SearchTerm=black+powder+filter&resetsearch=true>, retrieved on Jun. 16, 2020, available on or before 2020, 7 pages. |
Thach et al., “Further Improvements in Isomerization of Olefins in Solvent-free conditions,” retrieved from URL: <https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00397919308011226>, Journal of Synthetic Communications 23:10, Nov. 1992, 1379-1384, 3 pages, (abstract only). |
Van Beurden, “On the Catalytic Aspects of Stream-Methane Reforming: A Literature Survey,” ECN-I--04-003, retrieved from URL: <https://publicaties.ecn.nl/PdfFetch.aspx?nr=ECN-I--04-003>, Dec. 2004, 27 pages. |
Visconti et al., “CO2 Hydrogentation to Lower Olefins on a High Surface Area K—Promoted Bulk FE-Catalyst,” Applied Catalyysis B: Environmental 200:530-542, 2017, 44 pages. |
Wahyudi et al., “Utilization of Modified Red Mud as a Heterogeneous Base Catalyst for Transesterification of Canola Oil,” Journal of Chemical Engineering of Japan, 50:7, 2017, 561-567, 7 pages. |
Wang et al., “Fe—Cu Bimetallic Catalysts for Selective CO2 Hydrogenation to Olefin-rich C2+ Hydrocarbons,” I&EC Research, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 57(13): 4535-4542, Feb. 2018, 37 pages. |
Wei et al., “New insights into the effect of sodium on Fe3O4-based nanocatalysts for CO2 hydrogenation to light olefins,” Catalysis Science & Technology 6(13): 4786-4793, 2016, 8 pages. |
Yensen et al., “Open source all-iron battery for renewable energy storage,” HardwareX 6: e00072, 2019, 11 pages. |
You et al., “Hydrogenation of carbon dioxide to light olefins over non-supported iron catalyst,” Chinese Journal of Catalysis 34(5): 956-963, May 2013, 8 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220213008 A1 | Jul 2022 | US |