Acid modified red mud as a catalyst for olefin isomerization

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11427519
  • Patent Number
    11,427,519
  • Date Filed
    Monday, January 4, 2021
    3 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, August 30, 2022
    2 years ago
Abstract
A system and a method for isomerizing a 2-butene feed stream to form a 1-butene product stream are provided. An exemplary method includes calcining the red mud, flowing a butene feedstock over the red mud in an isomerization reactor, and separating 1-butene from a reactor effluent.
Description
BACKGROUND

The polymerization of olefins often uses comonomers to affect the final properties, such as density, crystallinity, and the like. The comonomers are generally alpha-olefins, such as 1-butene, 1-hexene, and 1-octene, among others. Alpha-olefins are also important feedstocks for numerous other products, including additives for drilling fluids, lubricants, synthetic oils, plasticizers, and other products.


One of the most important alpha-olefins is 1-butene. The market size projection for 1-butene has been projected to pass four billion USD in 2021. Satisfying the projected demand for 1-butene through the currently used method of ethylene dimerization may be impractical due to costs and its competitive use in polyethylene.


SUMMARY

An embodiment described in examples herein provides a method for using an acid modified red mud (AMRM) catalyst for olefin isomerization. The method includes forming the AMRM catalyst by dissolving red mud in water to form a red mud solution, neutralizing the red mud solution with an acid, and forming a precipitant by adding a base to the red mud solution. The precipitant is filtered from the red mud solution, dried, and ground to form particles of less than 100 μm. The particles are calcined to form the AMRM catalyst. A butene feedstock is flowed over the AMRM catalyst in an isomerization reactor. 1-Butene is separated from a reactor effluent.


Another embodiment described in examples herein provides a method of making an acid modified red mud (AMRM) catalyst for olefin isomerization. The method includes dissolving red mud in water to form a red mud solution and neutralizing the red mud solution with an acid. A precipitant is formed by adding a base to the red mud solution and the precipitant is filtered from the red mud solution. The precipitant is dried, calcined, and ground to form the AMRM catalyst with a particle size of less than about 100 μm.


Another embodiment described in examples herein provides an isomerization unit for producing a 1-butene product stream from a butene feedstock. The isomerization unit includes an upstream purification system to separate a feed stream that includes trans-2-butene and cis-2-butene from an initial feedstock, generating the butene feedstock. The isomerization unit further includes a reactor including an acid modified red mud (AMRM) catalyst to isomerize the trans-2-butene and cis-2-butene to form 1-butene, and a product purification system to isolate the 1-butene product stream from an effluent from the reactor.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a reaction scheme showing the inter-conversions of 2-butene and 1-butene by isomerization.



FIG. 2 is a method for using an acid modified red mud (AMRM) catalyst to convert 2-butene in a feedstock to 1-butene.



FIG. 3 is a method for preparing an AMRM catalyst for olefin isomerization.



FIG. 4 is an isomerization unit for implementing olefin isomerization using an AMRM catalyst.



FIG. 5 is a schematic diagram of an experimental reactor tube for testing the conversion of 2-butene to 1-butene using a red mud catalyst.



FIG. 6 is a bar chart showing the comparative yield of four catalysts in the conversion of 2-butene to 1-butene.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Alpha olefins used as comonomers for polymerization, such as 1-butene, 1-hexene, and 1-octene, may be produced by the isomerization of secondary olefins, for example, isolated from refinery feed streams. For example, one method for the production of 1-butene is the isomerization of 2-butene, which is an available material in refinery feed streams. The isomerization proceeds with aid of catalysts, such as SiO2, TiCl3, organo-aluminum, or zinc chromium ferrite (ZnxCryFezO4), acidized clay, alumina, or MgO catalysts, among others. However, improvements in cost, durability, selectivity, and efficiency of catalysts are desirable.


Red mud is a waste product generated during alumina production in the Bayer process, which is responsible for more than 95% of all alumina produced in the world. In this process, each ton of aluminum oxide that is produced results in 0.3 to 2.5 tons of bauxite tailings, or red mud. Consequently, about 155 million tons of red mud are created annually with worldwide storage at over 3.5 billion tons in 2014. Accordingly, red mud is a low cost material that is in high supply. Although red mud has significant heterogeneity, the generic composition is shown in Table 1. The complex mixture of metals indicates that red mud and modified red muds may be effective catalysts for the isomerization of olefins, such as 2-butene to 1-butene.









TABLE 1







The generic composition of global red mud













Component
Fe2O3
Al2O3
SiO2
Na2O
CaO
TiO2





Percentage
30-60%
10-20%
3-50%
2-10%
2-8%
10%









Methods for the use of acid modified red mud (AMRM) as a catalyst for olefin isomerization are described herein. The acid modification of the red mud increases the surface area of the red mud substantially. In one example, the surface area increased from about 16 m2/g to about 142 m2/g. For this reason, the AMRM catalyst shows a substantial increase in performance of over unmodified red mud used as a catalyst. Further, the metals content of the AMRM catalyst provides improved performance over other isomerization catalysts, such as SiO2 and MgO.



FIG. 1 is a reaction scheme 100 showing the inter-conversions of 2-butene and 1-butene by isomerization. In the reaction scheme 100, trans-2-butene 102, cis-2-butene 104, and 1-butene 106 can be isomerized to each other. The lowest energy configuration is the trans-2-butene 102, and thus, a catalyst is used to form the 1-butene 106.


In embodiments described in examples herein, an AMRM catalyst is used to isomerize the 2-butene isomers 102 and 104 to produce 1-butene. This takes advantage of the mixture of metals constituting red mud, which include Ti, Fe, and Al. The mixture of the metal compounds in the red mud may enhance the isomerization yield and selectivity, for example, as compared to MgO or SiO2 catalysts. Further, red mud is a waste material of negligible cost, which improves the competitive advantage over synthesized catalysts containing MgO or SiO2.


Accordingly, even at comparable rates of isomerization yield and selectivity, and including the cost of the acid modification, the low cost of the red mud makes the use of the AMRM catalyst favorable over higher cost catalysts. Further, the acid modification improves the performance of the AMRM catalyst over an unmodified red mud catalyst.



FIG. 2 is a method 200 for using an AMRM catalyst to convert 2-butene in a feedstock to 1-butene. Although the isomerization described in examples herein is 2-butene to 1-butene, it can be noted that the AMRM catalyst may be used for isomerization of other materials, for example, to form 1-octene, 1-hexene, and the like. The method 200 begins at block 202, with loading the AMRM catalyst into the reactor.


At block 204, the AMRM catalyst, for example, prepared by the procedure of FIG. 3, is activated. As described in the examples, the prepared AMRM catalyst is calcined to drive off excess moisture and volatile components. The drying is performed under air at a temperature of between about between about 85° C. and about 125° C., or at a temperature of between 95° C. and about 115° C., or at about 105° C. The drying may be performed for between about 40 minutes and about 6 hours, or for between about 2 hours and about 5 hours, or for about 4 hours. The catalyst is further calcined for activation, for example, by the generation of surface groups. The activation may be performed under a flow of an inert gas. The activation is performed at a temperature of between about 500° C. and about 700° C., or at a temperature of between 550° C. and about 650° C., or at about 600° C. The activation may be performed for between about 2 hours and about 6 hours, or for between about 3 hours and about 5 hours, or for about 4 hours.


At block 206, the 2-butene feedstock is flowed into the reactor for isomerization into the 1-butene. In some embodiments described herein, the 2-butene feedstock is a mixture of cis-2-butene and trans-2-butene, for example, at a 50-50 ratio. In various embodiments, such as in commercial usage, the 2-butene feedstock is a refinery stream that includes a number of hydrocarbons with boiling points in a range. For example, the 2-butene feedstock may be a light fraction from a hydrocracking unit, having a boiling point range of about −30° C. to about 40° C., about −20° C. to about 10° C., or about −10° C. to about 0° C. A narrower range of boiling points may be indicative of a feedstock that is higher in cis-2-butene and trans-2-butene, providing a higher purity 1-butene product stream, and decreasing the purification required before sales. The butene feedstock is flowed through the reactor at a weight-hour space velocity (WHSV) (hr−1) of between about 400 hr−1 and about 1400 hr−1, or between about 650 hr−1 and about 1150 hr−1, or about 900 hr−1.


At block 208, the 1-butene product is separated from the reactor effluent. The 1-butene may then be provided to other processes, such as polymerization of polyolefins. At block 210, the separated effluent, for example, including unreacted 2-butene, may be recycled to the reactor to increase yields. The separated effluent may be sent to purification systems upstream of the reactor to remove other hydrocarbons or may be provided directly to the reactor, for example, by being mixed with the initial feedstock.



FIG. 3 is a method 300 for preparing an AMRM catalyst for olefin isomerization. The method 300 begins at block 302 with the dissolution of the red mud in water. The water may be purified, for example, distilled or deionized, or may be tap water. Generally, any water source having low total dissolved solids may be used, as the variation of the composition of the final AMRM catalyst will not be substantially increased over the natural variation of a red mud. However, it can be noted that water that is higher in potassium, sodium, or sulfates, among other ions, may affect the catalyst activity. The dissolution may be aided by stirring, sonication, and the like. The amount of the red mud used may be between about 5% and about 20% of the total weight of the solution, or between about 7.5% and about 15% of the total weight of the solution, or about 10% of the total weight of the solution.


At block 304, the red mud solution is neutralized with acid. For example, as formed, the red mud solution may have a pH of greater than about 10 or greater than about 8. The acid is added to bring the pH to about 7, or about 6, or about 5, or less. Lowering the pH enhances the solubility and homogeneity of the red mud solution. In some embodiments, the acid solution is diluted hydrochloric acid, for example, a 2 wt. % hydrochloric acid solution, a 4 wt. % hydrochloric acid solution, or a 10 wt. % hydrochloric acid solution.


At block 306, the neutralized red mud solution is stirred at an elevated temperature over a period of time to complete the dissolution. For example, the red mud solution may be heated to a temperature of between about 40° C. and about 100° C., or a temperature of between about 50° C. and about 70° C., or to a temperature of about 60° C. The red mud solution may be stirred at the elevated temperature for greater than about 1 hour, greater than about 2 hours, or for about 3 hours or greater.


At block 308, a base is slowly added to the red mud solution to form a precipitant. In some embodiments, the base is ammonium hydroxide. In some embodiments, the base is sodium hydroxide or potassium hydroxide, among others. As noted herein, though, the presence of other ions, such as sodium or potassium ions, may affect the catalyst activity. The base is added while stirring until the pH reaches about 8. At block 310, the precipitant is filtered from the red mud solution. For example, the filtration may be performed using a vacuum filtration apparatus at lab or commercial scales.


At block 312, the precipitant is dried. This may be performed, for example, at a temperature of greater than 60° C., or greater than 80° C., or greater than 100° C. The drying may be conducted under a vacuum or may be performed under ambient atmospheric conditions. The drying is performed for greater than 4 hours, greater than 8 hours, or greater than 12 hours, for example, depending on the temperature and atmospheric conditions.


At block 314, the precipitant is calcined. In various embodiments, the calcination is performed at a temperature of greater than about 400° C., or at a temperature of greater than about 500° C., or at a temperature equal to or greater than about 600° C. In various embodiments, the calcination is performed for a period of time greater than about 1 hour, greater than about 2 hours, greater than about 4 hours, or greater than about 8 hours.


At block 316, the calcined precipitant is ground to form fine particles of the final AMRM catalyst. In various embodiments, the particle size is less than about 100 μm, less than about 90 μm, less than about 80 μm, less than about 70 μm, less than about 60 μm, or smaller. The particle size may be chosen to fit the reactor and reaction conditions, for example, a fixed bed reactor may use a larger particle size while a flowing bed reactor or a fluidized bed reactor may use a smaller particle size.


In commercial usage, the catalyst may be dried and activated at a remote production facility, before being brought to the isomerization unit and loaded into the reactor. Any number of combinations of this may be performed. For example, the catalyst may be dried at the remote production facility and activated after being loaded into the commercial isomerization reactor.



FIG. 4 is an isomerization unit 400 for implementing olefin isomerization using an AMRM catalyst. The isomerization unit 400 may be part of a refinery system, producing a number of different hydrocarbon streams. In this example, the isomerization unit 400 includes three units, an upstream purification system 402, a reactor 404, and a product purification system 406.


The initial feedstock 408 is fed to the upstream purification system 402. In various embodiments, the upstream purification system 402 includes a distillation column, a cryogenic distillation column, a flash vessel, and the like. Other streams (not shown), having different boiling point ranges, are separated out in the upstream purification system 402 and sent to another processing units. An isomerization feedstock stream 410, for example, having a boiling point range that includes trans-2-butene and cis-2-butene, is provided to the reactor 404.


In the reactor 404, the isomerization feedstock stream 410 is flowed over the red mud, which catalyzes the isomerization reaction of at least a portion of the 2-butene feedstocks to a 1-butene product. A reactor effluent stream 412 is then provided to the product purification system 406. In some embodiments, the reactor 404 is a standard isomerization reactor used in a refinery.


In the product purification system 406, the 1-butene product is separated and provided as a product stream 414. In various embodiments, the product purification system 406 includes a distillation column, a cryogenic distillation column, a flash vessel, and the like. The product stream 414 may be sold to polyolefin manufacturers, used in other processes to form other products, and the like. Other streams (not shown) from the product purification system 406 may be sent to other processing units. In some implementations, a recycle stream 416 is returned from the product purification system 406 to the upstream purification system 402 after removal of the 1-butene product. This may be performed to allow the recovery of unreacted trans-2-butene and cis-2-butene to increase the overall yield of the process. In other implementations, the recycle stream 416 is combined with the isomerization feedstock stream 410 directly, and fed to the reactor 404.


EXAMPLES

Formation of the AMRM Catalyst


Acid modified red mud catalyst was prepared using a homogeneous precipitation process. First, a red mud solution was formed by dissolving 10 g of dry red mud in 100 ml deionized water. The red mud solution was ultrasonicated for 3 min, and then it was neutralized by adding 40.5 ml of 37% hydrochloric acid mixed with 359.5 ml of deionized water.


The resulting solution was heated at 60° C. in a water bath and magnetically stirred for 3 hours. After that, a precipitant was formed from the solution by slowly adding aqueous ammonia (around 30 ml of NH4OH) while stirring until the pH reached 8. After that, the solution was filtered to isolate the precipitant, which was dried in an oven at 105° C. overnight and calcined at 600° C. for 4 hours. The final product was ground to have particle size less than 70 μm.


Characterization of AMRM Catalyst


The surface area of the AMRM catalyst, the total pore volume, and the pore size were measured using a Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) technique. These measurements may be performed, for example, using the procedures in the ISO 9277 standard, “Determination of the specific surface area of solids by gas adsorption—BET method,” Second Edition, 1 Sep. 2010. The BET results of the AMRM catalyst compared with unmodified RM are shown in Table 1.









TABLE 1







BET results of AMRM catalyst compared with unmodified RM












Total Pore




Surface Area
Volume



Sample
(m2/g)
(cm3/g)
Pore Size (Å)













RM
16
0.0530
133.668


AMRM
142
0.3164
89.210









Elemental analyses were performed by X-ray Fluorescence (XRF) analysis. The XRF analysis was performed on a Horiba® XGT-7200. The X-ray tube is equipped with an Rh target, voltage was set at 30 kV, no X-ray filter was used, and analysis preset time was 400 s. Before measurement, samples were placed on a double-sized tape (NICETACK™, Prod. No NW-15) and then placed in the chamber, which was then degassed. The results are an average of four measurements were taken.


The composition of Saudi Arabian red mud is shown in Table 2 along with the composition of the acid modified red mud (AMRM). The red mud composition listed in Table 2 is the comprehensive composition, which includes both major and minor constituents. The mixture of metals is thought to grant red mud a performance advantage over other isomerization catalysts, especially MgO and SiO2.


Comparative Catalyst Tests


The performance of an acid modified Saudi Arabian red mud sample in the isomerization of a mixture of trans-2-butene and cis-2-butene to 1-butene was evaluated at different temperatures, 450° C., 500° C., and 550° C. As red mud is a waste material, the composition is heterogeneous, with a 5%, or higher, variation in the composition. The variations in composition do not substantially affect the products or selectivity.


The results of the isomerization were compared to MgO and SiO2 commercial catalysts, as well as to an unmodified Saudi Arabian red mud (RM) catalyst. The experimental runs were performed in a BTRS reactor unit from Autoclave Engineers division of Parker Hannifin Corp, having 9 mm ID and 30 cm length. The reactor is a stainless steel reactor with four different MFC units to control the flowing gases. The maximum temperature of the reactor system is 800° C. and the maximum pressure is 20 bar. The amount of catalyst used in each run was 2 mL (0.65 g).









TABLE 2







Typical composition of Saudi Arabian Red Mud in weight percent.









Component
RM (from source)
AMRM












Al2O3
23.34
26


CaO
6.82
4.9


CeO2
0.09
0.174


Cl
0.03
0.204


Cr2O3
0.15
0.15


Fe2O3
29.45
34


Ga2O3
0.01
0.015


HfO2
0.1
0.036


K2O
0.07
0.02


MgO
0.07
0.176


MnO
0.06
0.067


Na2O
4.74
0.5


Nb2O5
0.03
0.035


P2O5
0.16
0.025


PbO
0.03
0.04


Sc2O3
0.02
0.027


SiO2
23.1
15


SO3
0.09
0.33


SrO
0.36
0.22


ThO2
0.02
0.04


TiO2
10
16.5


ZnO
0.01
0.012


ZrO2
0.43
0.46


Y2O3
0.02
0.021










FIG. 5 is a schematic diagram of an experimental reactor tube 500 for testing the conversion of 2-butene to 1-butene using a red mud catalyst. To hold the material in place a layer of quartz wool 502 is inserted into the experimental reactor tube 500. An initial layer 504 of 14 g of silicon carbide is poured over the quartz wool 502. A catalyst layer 506 including about 2 mL of catalyst is inserted into the experimental reactor tube 500. For the red mud catalyst, the 2 mL corresponds to about 0.65 g. Finally, a top layer 508 of about 17 g of silicon carbide is poured over the catalyst layer 506. The experimental reactor tube 500 is then inserted into the BTRS catalyst testing system.


Prior to evaluation, each catalyst sample was calcined under air at 650° C. to remove moisture or volatile gases, if present. The catalyst sample was then activated at 550° C. inside the reactor for 4 hrs under nitrogen. The 2-butene feed is a mixture of 50% cis-2-butene and 50% trans-2-butene. The concentration of 2-butene employed in the evaluation was 15% (5 ml) diluted with N2 (25 ml).


The amounts of hydrocarbons in the reactor effluent streams were measured by gas chromatography. This was performed using an Agilent GC-7890B instrument from Agilent. The column was a capillary column (HP-Al/KCL (50 mm×0.53 mm×15 μm) with an N2 stationary phase and He carrier gas. A hybrid detector including a flame ionization detector (FID) and a thermal conductivity detector (TCD) was used. The flow rate of the carrier gas was 15 ml/min. After injection, the temperature was ramped from 50° C. to 170° C. over a time span of 10 min., then the temperature was held at 220° C. for 15 min., before being cooled to the starting temperature.


From the GC results, yields and selectivities were calculated by the following formulas:






Yield
=

Conversion





of





butenes
×
Selectivity





of





the





product






(

1


-


butene

)








Conversion
=

100
-

(


CisButene





Yield

+

TransButene





Yield


)









Conversion


-


C4

=

100
-

(


Cis


-


2


-


Butene





Yield

+

Trans


-


2


-


Butene





Yield


)








Selectivity
=



Yield





of





Product

Conversion

×
100






In these formulas, yield represents the yield of 1-butene as obtained through the GC Retention Factor. The conversion of 2-butene (cis and trans 2-butene) is also obtained though GC retention factor.



FIG. 6 is a bar chart 600 showing the comparative yield of four catalysts in the conversion of 2-butene to 1-butene. At all three tested temperatures, 450° C., 500° C., and 550° C., the AMRM catalyst provided a significantly higher yield of 1-butene than the other catalysts, including SiO2, MgO, and unmodified red mud.


As described herein, red mud was modified with acid, substantially increasing its surface area from 16 m2/g to 142 m2/g. The increased surface area, among other factors, increased the isomerization yield by 140% for 1-butene production from 2-butene, when compared to unmodified red mud. In addition, the proposed red mud modification enhanced the 2-butene isomerization yield by 66% and 733%, when compared to the commercially utilized catalysts of MgO and SiO2, respectively. The yield increase took place at 450° C. as illustrated in FIG. 6, which will reduce the energy used in commercial implementations and, thus, lower CO2 emissions.


An embodiment described in examples herein provides a method for using an acid modified red mud (AMRM) catalyst for olefin isomerization. The method includes forming the AMRM catalyst by dissolving red mud in water to form a red mud solution, neutralizing the red mud solution with an acid, and forming a precipitant by adding a base to the red mud solution. The precipitant is filtered from the red mud solution, dried, and ground to form particles of less than 100 μm. The particles are calcined to form the AMRM catalyst. A butene feedstock is flowed over the AMRM catalyst in an isomerization reactor. 1-Butene is separated from a reactor effluent.


In an aspect, the method further includes calcining the AMRM catalyst to activate the AMRM catalyst at a temperature of between about 400° C. and about 700° C. for between about 2 hours and about 6 hours. In an aspect, the method further includes calcining the AMRM catalyst to activate the AMRM catalyst at a temperature of between about 500° C. and about 600° C. for between about 3 hours and about 5 hours. In an aspect, the method further includes calcining the AMRM catalyst to activate the AMRM catalyst at a temperature of about 550° C. for about 4 hours.


In an aspect, the butene feedstock is obtained from an upstream purification system in a refinery. In an aspect, the butene feedstock is obtained with a boiling point range of between about −30° C. and about 40° C. In an aspect, the butene feedstock is obtained with a boiling point range of between about −20° C. and about 10° C. In an aspect, the butene feedstock is obtained with a boiling point range of between about −10° C. and about 0° C.


In an aspect, the butene feedstock is flowed over the AMRM catalyst at a weight-hour space velocity of between about 400 hr−1 and 1300 hr−1. In an aspect, the butene feedstock is flowed over the AMRM catalyst at a weight-hour space velocity of between about 650 hr−1 and 1150 hr−1. In an aspect, the butene feedstock is flowed over the AMRM catalyst at a weight-hour space velocity of about 900 hr−1.


In an aspect, the 1-butene is separated from the reactor effluent in a distillation column. In an aspect, the reactor effluent is returned to an upstream purification system after removal of the 1-butene from the reactor effluent. In an aspect, the reactor effluent is combined with the butene feedstock after separating the 1-butene from the reactor effluent.


Another embodiment described in examples herein provides a method of making an acid modified red mud (AMRM) catalyst for olefin isomerization. The method includes dissolving red mud in water to form a red mud solution and neutralizing the red mud solution with an acid. A precipitant is formed by adding a base to the red mud solution and the precipitant is filtered from the red mud solution. The precipitant is dried, calcined, and ground to form the AMRM catalyst with a particle size of less than about 100 μm.


In an aspect, the red mud is dissolved in the water at a concentration of about 10 wt. %. In an aspect, the acid is added until the pH of the red mud solution is less than about 7. In an aspect, the base is added until the pH of the red mud solution is greater than about 8. In an aspect, the precipitant is dried at a temperature of greater than about 100° C. for a least about 8 hours.


In an aspect, the precipitant is calcined at a temperature of between about 500° C. and about 800° C. for between about 2 hours and about 6 hours. In an aspect, the precipitant is calcined at a temperature of between about 600° C. and about 700° C. for between about 3 hours and about 5 hours. In an aspect, the precipitant is calcined at a temperature of about 600° C. for about 4 hours.


Another embodiment described in examples herein provides an isomerization unit for producing a 1-butene product stream from a butene feedstock. The isomerization unit includes an upstream purification system to separate a feed stream that includes trans-2-butene and cis-2-butene from an initial feedstock, generating the butene feedstock. The isomerization unit further includes a reactor including an acid modified red mud (AMRM) catalyst to isomerize the trans-2-butene and cis-2-butene to form 1-butene, and a product purification system to isolate the 1-butene product stream from an effluent from the reactor.


In an aspect, the butene feedstock has a boiling point range of about −20° C. to about 10° C. In an aspect, the product purification system includes a distillation column configured to recycle the effluent to the upstream purification system, after removal of the 1-butene product stream.


Other implementations are also within the scope of the following claims.

Claims
  • 1. A method for using an acid modified red mud (AMRM) catalyst for olefin isomerization, comprising: forming the AMRM catalyst by: dissolving red mud in water to form a red mud solution;neutralizing the red mud solution with an acid;forming a precipitant by adding a base to the neutralized red mud solution;filtering the precipitant from the red mud solution containing the added base;drying the precipitant;grinding the dried precipitant to form particles of less than 100 μm; andcalcining the particles to form the AMRM catalyst; andflowing a butene feedstock comprising 2-butene over the AMRM catalyst in an isomerization reactor to obtain a reactor effluent comprising 1-butene; andseparating 1-butene from the reactor effluent.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, further comprising calcining the AMRM catalyst to activate the AMRM catalyst at a temperature of between about 400° C. and about 700° C. for between about 2 hours and about 6 hours.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, further comprising calcining the AMRM catalyst to activate the AMRM catalyst at a temperature of between about 500° C. and about 600° C. for between about 3 hours and about 5 hours.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, further comprising calcining the AMRM catalyst to activate the AMRM catalyst at a temperature of about 550° C. for about 4 hours.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, further comprising obtaining the butene feedstock from an upstream purification system in a refinery.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, comprising obtaining the butene feedstock with a boiling point range of between about −30° C. and about 40° C.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, comprising obtaining the butene feedstock with a boiling point range of between about −20° C. and about 10° C.
  • 8. The method of claim 1, comprising obtaining the butene feedstock with a boiling point range of between about −10° C. and about 0° C.
  • 9. The method of claim 1, further comprising flowing the butene feedstock over the AMRM catalyst at a weight hour space velocity of between about 400 hr−1 and 1300 hr−1.
  • 10. The method of claim 1, further comprising flowing the butene feedstock over the AMRM catalyst at a weight hour space velocity of between about 650 hr−1 and 1150 hr−1.
  • 11. The method of claim 1, further comprising flowing the butene feedstock over the AMRM catalyst at a weight hour space velocity of about 900 hr−1.
  • 12. The method of claim 1, further comprising separating the 1-butene from the reactor effluent in a distillation column.
  • 13. The method of claim 1, further comprising returning the reactor effluent to an upstream purification system after removal of the 1-butene from the reactor effluent.
  • 14. The method of claim 1, further comprising combining the reactor effluent with the butene feedstock after separating the 1-butene from the reactor effluent.
US Referenced Citations (156)
Number Name Date Kind
106836 Kuhlmann Aug 1870 A
665346 Reed Jan 1901 A
701987 Alz Jun 1902 A
978576 Goodell Dec 1910 A
2378905 Bates Jun 1945 A
2614066 Cornell Oct 1952 A
2910426 Gluesenkamp Oct 1959 A
3288692 Leduc Nov 1966 A
3409540 Gould et al. Nov 1968 A
3427235 Leduc Feb 1969 A
3527834 Kehl et al. Sep 1970 A
3533938 Leas Oct 1970 A
3585217 Titzenthaler Jun 1971 A
3632497 Leduc Jan 1972 A
3702292 Burich Nov 1972 A
3726789 Kovach Apr 1973 A
3755143 Hosoi et al. Aug 1973 A
3856659 Owen Dec 1974 A
3894059 Selvaratnam Jul 1975 A
4064062 Yurko Dec 1977 A
4090949 Owen et al. May 1978 A
4119507 Simmrock et al. Oct 1978 A
4134824 Kamm et al. Jan 1979 A
4230551 Salyer et al. Oct 1980 A
4264435 Read et al. Apr 1981 A
4297203 Ford et al. Oct 1981 A
4310501 Reh et al. Jan 1982 A
4332663 Berneke Jun 1982 A
4426276 Dean et al. Jan 1984 A
4434031 Horowitz et al. Feb 1984 A
4522802 Setzer et al. Jun 1985 A
4527003 Okamoto et al. Jul 1985 A
4560451 Nielsen Dec 1985 A
4587011 Okamoto et al. May 1986 A
4602986 Ellis et al. Jul 1986 A
4655904 Okamoto et al. Apr 1987 A
4725349 Okamoto et al. Feb 1988 A
4735728 Wemhoff Apr 1988 A
4761394 Lauritzen Aug 1988 A
4786400 Farnsworth Nov 1988 A
4830728 Herbat et al. May 1989 A
4992160 Long et al. Feb 1991 A
5012360 Yamauchi et al. Apr 1991 A
5091351 Murakawa et al. Feb 1992 A
5108581 Aldridge Apr 1992 A
5527436 Cooker et al. Jun 1996 A
5601937 Isenberg Feb 1997 A
5624493 Wagh et al. Apr 1997 A
5904837 Fujiyama May 1999 A
5906728 Iaccino et al. May 1999 A
5951850 Ino et al. Sep 1999 A
6033555 Chen et al. Mar 2000 A
6084142 Yao et al. Jul 2000 A
6190533 Bradow et al. Feb 2001 B1
6210562 Xie et al. Apr 2001 B1
6280593 Wiese et al. Aug 2001 B1
6293979 Choudhary et al. Sep 2001 B1
6312658 Hufton et al. Nov 2001 B1
6319864 Hannigan et al. Nov 2001 B1
6336791 O'Toole Jan 2002 B1
6531515 Moore, Jr. et al. Mar 2003 B2
6656346 Ino et al. Dec 2003 B2
6743961 Powers Jun 2004 B2
6849356 Dow et al. Feb 2005 B2
6852901 Hasenberg et al. Feb 2005 B2
6979757 Powers Dec 2005 B2
7019187 Powers Mar 2006 B2
7045554 Raje et al. May 2006 B2
7132042 Genetti et al. Nov 2006 B2
7302795 Vetrovec Dec 2007 B2
7374664 Powers May 2008 B2
7378561 Olah et al. May 2008 B2
7396449 Powers Jul 2008 B2
7404889 Powers Jul 2008 B1
7419584 Stell et al. Sep 2008 B2
7460333 Akamatsu et al. Dec 2008 B2
7550642 Powers Jun 2009 B2
7592290 Hussain et al. Sep 2009 B2
7642292 Severinsky Jan 2010 B2
7744747 Halsey Jun 2010 B2
7858834 Powers Dec 2010 B2
7906559 Olah et al. Mar 2011 B2
7972498 Buchanan et al. Jul 2011 B2
7973087 Kibby et al. Jul 2011 B2
8152973 Yamamoto et al. Apr 2012 B2
8198338 Shulenberger et al. Jun 2012 B2
8287716 Al-Sadah Oct 2012 B2
8303917 Miyashiro et al. Nov 2012 B2
8304567 Kadota et al. Nov 2012 B2
8628668 Simonson Jan 2014 B2
8816137 Olah et al. Aug 2014 B2
8845940 Niven et al. Sep 2014 B2
8951333 Cabourdin et al. Feb 2015 B2
9085497 Jennings Jul 2015 B2
9090543 Schoedel et al. Jul 2015 B2
9096806 Abba et al. Aug 2015 B2
9175409 Sivasankar et al. Nov 2015 B2
9221027 Kuppler et al. Dec 2015 B2
9242230 Moon et al. Jan 2016 B2
9255230 Shafi et al. Feb 2016 B2
9260366 Verhaak et al. Feb 2016 B2
9279088 Shafi et al. Mar 2016 B2
9284497 Bourane et al. Mar 2016 B2
9284502 Bourane et al. Mar 2016 B2
9296961 Shafi et al. Mar 2016 B2
9303323 DiMascio et al. Apr 2016 B2
9312454 Itoh et al. Apr 2016 B2
9328035 Kuhn et al. May 2016 B1
9435404 Goleski et al. Sep 2016 B2
9555367 Masel et al. Jan 2017 B2
9559375 Savinell et al. Jan 2017 B2
9618264 Berdut-Teruel Apr 2017 B1
9634343 Munier et al. Apr 2017 B2
9675979 Hassell Jun 2017 B2
9752080 Christensen et al. Sep 2017 B2
9884313 Shen et al. Feb 2018 B2
9963392 Deo et al. May 2018 B2
9970804 Khousa et al. May 2018 B2
9973141 Hammad et al. May 2018 B2
10179733 Becker et al. Jan 2019 B2
10252243 Fadhel et al. Apr 2019 B2
10252909 Lofberg et al. Apr 2019 B2
10329676 Kaczur et al. Jun 2019 B2
10357759 D'Souza et al. Jul 2019 B2
10422754 Al Hosani et al. Sep 2019 B2
20030233018 Brown et al. Dec 2003 A1
20050211603 Guillaume et al. Sep 2005 A1
20060171065 Akamatsu et al. Aug 2006 A1
20080011644 Dean Jan 2008 A1
20080011645 Dean Jan 2008 A1
20080083648 Bishop et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080194900 Bhirud Aug 2008 A1
20080277314 Halsey Nov 2008 A1
20080283445 Powers Nov 2008 A1
20090050523 Halsey Feb 2009 A1
20100089795 Fujiyama et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100137458 Erling Jun 2010 A1
20110021858 Ramachandran et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110083996 Shafi et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110132770 Sala et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110247500 Akhras et al. Oct 2011 A1
20130129610 Kale May 2013 A1
20130220884 Bourane et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130233766 Shafi et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130248419 Abba Sep 2013 A1
20150225295 Mcandlish et al. Aug 2015 A1
20150337445 Hasegawa et al. Nov 2015 A1
20150343416 Fadhel et al. Dec 2015 A1
20160002035 Ralston et al. Jan 2016 A1
20160264886 Davydov Sep 2016 A1
20160333487 Rodriguez Nov 2016 A1
20170050845 Lofberg et al. Feb 2017 A1
20170292197 Lei et al. Oct 2017 A1
20180057423 Kimura et al. Mar 2018 A1
20190194074 Amr et al. Jun 2019 A1
20210387929 Fadhel et al. Dec 2021 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (15)
Number Date Country
2938299 May 2015 CA
104923234 Dec 2017 CN
111450841 Jul 2020 CN
102006020843 Nov 2007 DE
2000009633 Feb 2000 WO
2009073436 Jun 2009 WO
2010009077 Jan 2010 WO
2010009082 Jan 2010 WO
2010009089 Jan 2010 WO
2010143783 Dec 2010 WO
2015128045 Sep 2013 WO
2014160168 Oct 2014 WO
2015183200 Dec 2015 WO
2016207892 Dec 2016 WO
2019112555 Jun 2019 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (48)
Entry
Sushil et al. (“Modification of red mud by acid treatment and its application for CO removal.” Journal of Hazardous Materials 203-204 (2012) 264-273) (Year: 2012).
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Appln. No. PCT/US2022/011194, dated Apr. 22, 2022, 12 pages.
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Appln. No. PCT/US2021/036161, dated Sep. 9, 2021, 13 pages.
Sushil et al., “Catalytic applications of red mud, an aluminium industry waste: A review,” Applied Catalysis B. Environmental, May 2008, 81(1-2): 64-77, 14 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/899,254, filed Jun. 11, 2020, Fadhel et al.
Albrecht et al., “Unexpectedly efficient CO2 hydrogenation to higher hydrocarbons over non-doped Fe2O3,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 204: 119-126, May 2017, 8 pages.
Bhuiyan, “Metathesis of Butene to Produce Propylene over Mesoporous Tungsten Oxide Catalyst: Synthesis, Characterization and Kinetic Modeling,” A Thesis Presented to the Deanship of Graduate Studies, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Chemical Engineering, Jun. 2013, 188 pages.
Chew et al., “Effect of nitrogen doping on the reducibility, activity and selectivity of carbon nanotube-supported iron catalysts applied in CO2 hydrogenation,” Applied Catalysis A: General 482: 163-170, Jul. 2014, 29 pages.
Choi et al., “Carbon dioxide Fischer-Tropsch synthesis: A new path to carbon-neutral fuels,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 202: 605-610, Mar. 2017, 6 pages.
Choi et al., “Hydrogenation of carbon dioxide over alumina supported Fe—K catalysts,” Catalysis Letters 40: 115-118, Mar. 1996, 4 pages.
Cowie et al., “Naturally occurring radioactive material and naturally occurring mercury assessment of black powder in sales gas pipelines,” Radiation Protection and Environment 42: 34-9, Jan.-Mar. & Apr.-Jun. 2019, 6 pages.
Cramer et al., “The Mechanism of Isomerization of Olefins with transition metal catalysts,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, 88(15): 3534-3544, Aug. 5, 1966, 11 pages.
Dinesh et al., “Iron-based flow batteries to store renewable energies,” Environmental Chemistry Letters, Feb. 2018, 12 pages.
Ding et al., “CO2 Hydrogenation to Hydrocarbons over Iron-Based Catalyst: Effects of Physico-Chemical Properties of A12O3 Supports,” I&EC Research, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 53(45): 17563-17569, Oct. 2014, 30 pages.
Du et al., “Sodium Hydroxide Production from Seawater Desalination Brine: Process Design and Energy Efficiency,” Environmental Science & Technology 52: 5949-5958, 2018, 10 pages.
Fang et al., “A Nanomesoporous Catalyst from Modifier Red Mud and Its Application for Methane Decomposition to Hydrogran Production,” Article ID 6947636, Hindawi Publishing Corporation, Journal of Nanomaterials, 2016, 8 pages.
Godoy et al., “210Pb content in natural gas pipeline residues (“black-powder”) and its correlation with the chemical composition,” Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 83: 101-111, 2005, 12 pages.
Grafe et al., “Bauxite residue issues: IV. Old obstacles and new pathways for in situ residue bioremediation,” Hydrometallurgy 108: 46-59, 2011, 14 pages.
Hu et al., “Hydrothermally stable MOFs for CO2 hydrogenation over iron-based catalyst to light olefins,” Journal of CO2 Utilization, 15: 89-95, 2016, 7 pages.
Hua et al., “Transformation of 2-Butene into Propene on WO3/MCM-48: Metathesis and Isomerization of n-Butene,” Catalysts 8: 585, 2018, 11 pages.
Kurtoglu and Uzun, “Red Mud as an Efficient, Stable, and Cost-Free Catalyst for Cox-Free Hydrogren Production from Ammonia,” Scientific Reports, 6:32279, 2016, 8 pages.
Lee et al., “Selective Positional Isomerization of 2-Butene over Alumina and La-promoted Alumina Catalysts,” J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 13(7): 1062-1066, Dec. 2007, 5 pages.
Life-greenlysis.eu [online], “Hydrogen and Oxygen production via electrolysis powered by renewable energies to reduce environmental footprint of a WWTP.,” Greenlysis, URL <www.life-greenlysis.eu>, 2010-2012, 16 pages.
Liu et al. “Fe—MOF-derived highly active catalysts for carbon dioxide hydrogenation to valuable hydrocarbons,” Journal of CO2 Utilization 21:100-107, Oct. 2017, 8 pages.
Liu et al., “Preparation of Modified Red Mud-Supported Fe Catalysts for Hydrogran Production by Catalytic Methane Decomposition,” Article ID 8623463, Hindawi, Journal of Nanomaterials, 2017, 11 pages.
Liu et al., “Pyrolyzing ZIF-8 to N-doped porous carbon facilitated by iron and potassium for CO2 hydrogenation to value-added hydrocarbons,” Journal of CO2 Utilization 25: 120-127, May 2018, 8 pages.
Madadkhani, “Red mud as an Ironbased Catalyst for Catalytic Cracking of Naphthalene,” a Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree of Master of Applied Science in the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies (Chemical and Biological Engineering), The University of British Columbia, Dec. 2016, 192 pages.
Morrison, “Cis-trans Isomerization of Olefins by Intramolecular Energy Transfer,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 87(4): 932, Feb. 1965, 1 page.
Naik et al. “Carbon Dioxide sequestration in cementitious products,” Report No. CNU-2009-02, REP-640, Department of Civil Engineering and Mechanics, College of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Jan. 2009, 53 pages.
Nam et al., “Catalytic conversion of carbon dioxide into hydrocarbons over iron supported on alkali ion-exchanged Y-zeolite catalysts,” Applied Catalysis A: General 179: 155-163, Apr. 1999, 9 pages.
Nam et al., “Catalytic Conversion of Carbon dioxide into hyrdrocarbons over zinc promoted iron catalysts,” Energy onvers. Manage. 38: S397-S402, 1997, 6 pages.
Ndlela et al., “Reducibility of Potassium-Promoted Iron Oxide under Hydrogen Conditions,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 42: 2112-2121, 2003, 10 pages.
Numpilai et al., “Pore size effects on physicochemical properties of Fe—Co/K—A12O3 catalysts and their catalytic activity in CO2 hydrogenation to light olefins,” Applied Surface Science 483: 581-592, Jul. 2019, 12 pages.
Pall.com [online], “Cyclo-Filter System,” retrieved from URL <https://www.pall.com/en/oil-gas/midstream/midstream-black-powder.html>, retrieved on Jun. 16, 2020, available on or before 2020, 4 pages.
Pavlov et al., “Processes of Synthesis of 1-Butene from 2-Butene by the Positional Isomerization on Sulfocation Exchangers,” Russian Journal of Applied Chemistry, 82:6, 2009, 1117-1122, 6 pages.
Ramirez et al., “Metal Organic Framework—Derived Iron Catalysts for the Direct Hydrogenation of CO2 to Short Chain Olefins,” ACS Catalysis 8:9174-9182, 2018, 32 pages.
Researchandmarkets.com [online], “Global 1 Butene Demand—Supply and Price Analysis,” 2002-2021, retrieved on Jan. 26, 2021, retrieved from URL <https://www.researchandmarkets.com/reports/3752113/global-1-butene-demand-supply-and-price-analysis>, 1 page.
Russkikh et al. “Turning Waste into Value: Potassium-Promoted Red Mud as an Effective Catalyst for the Hydrogenation of CO2,” ChemSusChem 13.11, 2020,2981-2987, 7 pages.
Russkikh et al., “Red mud as an efficient catalyst in turning CO2 hydrogenation,” Chemical Science Seminar, retrieved from URL: <https://pse.kaust.edu.sa/events/red-mud-as-an-efficient-catalyst-in-turning-co2-hydrogenationinto-useful-products>, Oct. 13, 2019, KAUST, 2019, 1 page, (abstract only).
Shop.pall.com (online), “Black Powder Filter,” retrieved from URL <https://shop.pall.com/us/en/search?SearchTerm=black+powder+filter&resetsearch=true>, retrieved on Jun. 16, 2020, available on or before 2020, 7 pages.
Thach et al., “Further Improvements in Isomerization of Olefins in Solvent-free conditions,” retrieved from URL: <https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00397919308011226>, Journal of Synthetic Communications 23:10, Nov. 1992, 1379-1384, 3 pages, (abstract only).
Van Beurden, “On the Catalytic Aspects of Stream-Methane Reforming: A Literature Survey,” ECN-I--04-003, retrieved from URL: <https://publicaties.ecn.nl/PdfFetch.aspx?nr=ECN-I--04-003>, Dec. 2004, 27 pages.
Visconti et al., “CO2 Hydrogentation to Lower Olefins on a High Surface Area K—Promoted Bulk FE-Catalyst,” Applied Catalyysis B: Environmental 200:530-542, 2017, 44 pages.
Wahyudi et al., “Utilization of Modified Red Mud as a Heterogeneous Base Catalyst for Transesterification of Canola Oil,” Journal of Chemical Engineering of Japan, 50:7, 2017, 561-567, 7 pages.
Wang et al., “Fe—Cu Bimetallic Catalysts for Selective CO2 Hydrogenation to Olefin-rich C2+ Hydrocarbons,” I&EC Research, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 57(13): 4535-4542, Feb. 2018, 37 pages.
Wei et al., “New insights into the effect of sodium on Fe3O4-based nanocatalysts for CO2 hydrogenation to light olefins,” Catalysis Science & Technology 6(13): 4786-4793, 2016, 8 pages.
Yensen et al., “Open source all-iron battery for renewable energy storage,” HardwareX 6: e00072, 2019, 11 pages.
You et al., “Hydrogenation of carbon dioxide to light olefins over non-supported iron catalyst,” Chinese Journal of Catalysis 34(5): 956-963, May 2013, 8 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20220213008 A1 Jul 2022 US