This disclosure, in general, relates to acoustic damping compositions, construction materials formed using such acoustic damping compositions, and methods of using acoustic damping compositions.
Noise control has long been an issue in residential and business settings. With increasing urbanization and an increasing cost of real estate, individuals are living and working in closer proximity, increasing the need for noise reduction, particularly in high rise and apartment settings. To combat noise in such urban settings, several cities, states and countries have implemented noise control building codes. Further, many building owners specify noise tolerance in construction specifications during construction.
However, many conventional methods for controlling noise are either cumbersome to install or ineffective. Particularly in the case of walls, conventional techniques include the use of resilient members disposed between a wall panel and a support. Such resilient members can be difficult to install and are expensive. Other conventional methods include the installation of thick insulative members which have limited effectiveness and add additional steps to the installation and construction of walls or ceilings.
Another technique used for controlling noise is the use of a damping material between layers of construction material, such as plywood or drywall. Such damping materials are also referred to as constrained layer damping materials. However, conventional damping materials provide limited sound control for particular noise.
As such, an improved acoustic damping composition would be desirable.
The present disclosure may be better understood, and its numerous features and advantages made apparent to those skilled in the art by referencing the accompanying drawings.
The use of the same reference symbols in different drawings indicates similar or identical items.
In a particular embodiment, an acoustic damping composition includes a binder resin, a modifying resin, and elastomeric particles. In an example, the binder resin is an addition polymer having a carboxylic functional group. For example, the binder resin may be an acrylic component. The modifying resin may include a urethane component. The elastomeric particles may have an average particle size of not greater than 850 micrometers and may have a modulus of elasticity of not greater than 20 MPa. The acoustic damping composition has a Mode 1 Damping Parameter of at least 0.45. In addition, the acoustic damping composition may have a Mode 2 Damping Parameter of at least 0.27 or a Mode 3 Damping Parameter of at least 0.27. Such an acoustic damping composition may be incorporated into a construction panel, for example, between two rigid panels.
In an example, the acoustic damping composition may be extruded on a first major surface of a first rigid panel. A first major surface of a second rigid panel may be contacted with the acoustic damping composition to form a laminate that may be used in the construction of walls, ceilings, or floors. In particular, the acoustic damping composition may be formulated as a water-based emulsion including the binder resin, modifying resin, and elastomeric particles. When applied, the water of the water-based emulsion may evaporate to leave the binder resin, the modifying resin, and elastomeric particles of the acoustic damping composition.
In an exemplary embodiment, the binder resin is an addition polymer having a carboxylic functional group, such as a carboxylic acid or an ester derivative functional group. An addition polymer is a polymer formed through addition polymerization as opposed to condensation polymerization. In an example, the binder resin is formed from a monomer, such as acrylic acid, methyl methacrylate, ethyl methacrylate, methacrylate, methyl acrylate, ethyl acrylate, vinyl acetate, derivatives thereof, or any combination thereof. For example, the binder resin may include polyvinyl acetate, a derivative thereof, or a copolymer thereof. In a further example, the polyvinyl acetate may be modified, such as through hydroxylization to form a copolymer poly(vinyl acetate-co-vinyl alcohol).
In another example, the binder resin may be an acrylic resin. The acrylic resin may have an alkyl group having from 1-4 carbon atoms, a glycidyl group or a hydroxyalkyl group having from 1-4 carbon atoms. Representative acrylic polymers include polyacrylate, polymethyl methacrylate, polyethyl methacrylate, polybutyl methacrylate, polyglycidyl methacrylate, polyhydroxyethyl methacrylate, polymethyl acrylate, polyethyl acrylate, polybutyl acrylate, polyglycidyl acrylate, polyhydroxyethyl acrylate, or any combination thereof. In a particular example, the acrylic resin is in the form of an emulsion, such as a water-based emulsion. For example, the acrylic resin may be an adhesive acrylic resin, such as a pressure-sensitive adhesive acrylic resin.
In particular, the binder resin has a low glass transition temperature. For example, the glass transition temperature of the binder resin may be not greater than −25° C. In an example, the glass transition temperature is not greater than −40° C., such as not greater than −50° C. Further, the glass transition temperature of the binder resin may be not greater than −60° C.
In addition, the binder resin may have a molecular weight of at least 8,000 atomic units, such as at least 10,000 atomic units, at least 20,000 atomic units, or even as high as 25,000 atomic units or higher. In particular, the average molecular weight of the binder resin is not greater than 100,000 atomic units. In a particular embodiment, the binder resin is a viscoelastic resin, exhibiting a hysteresis on a stress versus strain graph.
Further, the acoustic damping composition includes a modifying resin. The modifying resin may be an acrylic resin, a urethane resin, an epoxy resin, an acrylate/amine resin, or any combination thereof. In general, the modifying resin is self-dispersible in aqueous emulsions and is immiscible with the binder resin.
In a particular embodiment, the modifying resin is a urethane resin formed from reactants including isocyanate, an ether alcohol, and an ester alcohol. In a particular embodiment, the isocyanate component includes a diisocyanate monomer. An exemplary diisocyanate monomer may include toluene diisocyanate, m-phenylene diisocyanate, p-phenylene diisocyanate, xylene diisocyanate, 4,4′-diphenylmethane diisocyanate, hexamethylene diisocyanate, isophorone diisocyanate, polymethylene polyphenyl diisocyanate, 3,3′-dimethyl-4,4′-biphenylene diisocyanate, 3,3′-dimethyl-4,4′-diphenylmethane diisocyanate, 3,3′-dichloro-4,4′-biphenylene diisocyanate, or 1,5-naphthalene diisocyanate; their modified products, for instance, carbodiimide-modified products; or the like, or any combination thereof. Such diisocyanate monomers may be used alone or in admixture of at least two kinds. In a particular example, the isocyanate component may include methylene diphenyl diisocyanate (MDI), toluene diisocyanate (TDI), hexamethylene diisocyanate (HDI), isophorone diisocyanate (IPDI), or any combination thereof. In an example, the isocyanate may include methylene diphenyl diisocyanate (MDI) or toluene diisocyanate (TDI). In particular, the isocyanate includes methylene diphenyl diisocyanate (MDI).
In an example, the isocyanate forms 10 wt % to 50 wt % of the reactants that form the urethane component. For example, the isocyanate may form 20 wt % to 40 wt % of the reactants, such as 25 wt % to 35 wt % of the reactants.
In an example, the ether alcohol may include a polyether polyol or an alkoxy derivative thereof. A suitable polyether polyol useful for production of the modifying resin can be produced by polyinsertion via double metal cyanide (DMC) catalysis of alkylene oxides, by anionic polymerization of alkylene oxides in the presence of alkali hydroxides or alkali alcoholates as catalysts and with the addition of at least one initiator molecule containing 2 to 6, preferably 2 to 4, reactive hydrogen atoms in bonded form, or by cationic polymerization of alkylene oxides in the presence of Lewis acids, such as antimony pentachloride or boron fluoride etherate. A suitable alkylene oxide may contain 2 to 4 carbon atoms in the alkylene radical. An example includes tetrahydrofuran, 1,2-propylene oxide, 1,2- or 2,3-butylene oxide; ethylene oxide, 1,2-propylene oxide, or any combination thereof. The alkylene oxides can be used individually, in succession, or as a mixture. In particular, mixtures of 1,2-propylene oxide and ethylene oxide may be used, whereby the ethylene oxide is used in quantities of 10% to 50% as an ethylene oxide terminal block so that the resulting polyols display over 70% primary OH terminal groups. An example of an initiator molecule includes water or dihydric or trihydric alcohols, such as ethylene glycol, 1,2-propanediol and 1,3-propanediol, diethylene glycol, dipropylene glycol, ethane-1,4-diol, glycerol, trimethylol propane, or any combination thereof.
Suitable polyether polyols, such as polyoxypropylene polyoxyethylene polyols, have average functionalities of 1.6 to 2.4, such as 1.8 to 2.4, and number-average molecular weights of 800 g/mol to 25,000 g/mol, such as 800 g/mol to 14,000 g/mol, particularly 2,000 g/mol to 9,000 g/mol. Difunctional or trifunctional polyether polyols having a number-average molecular weight of 800 g/mol to 25,000 g/mol, such as 800 g/mol to 14,000 g/mol, or even 2,000 g/mol to 9,000 g/mol, may be used as polyol components.
In a particular example, the polyether polyol includes polyethylene glycol, methoxy derivatives thereof, ethoxy derivatives thereof, or any combination thereof. The polyethylene glycol or derivative thereof may include between 3 and 20 ethylene glycol units, such as between 5 and 20 ethylene glycol units, or even between 5 and 15 ethylene glycol units. Further, the ether alcohol may include blends of polyethylene glycol or derivatives thereof having a different number of ethylene glycol units. Another exemplary ether alcohol includes phenyl alcohol-based glycol ethers.
In another example, the ether alcohol component may include a polypropylene glycol alkyl ether. In an example, the polypropylene glycol alkyl ether may include dipropylene glycol n-butyl ether, tripropylene glycol n-butyl ether, or any combination thereof.
In a particular embodiment, the reactants that form the polyurethane include at least 15% by weight of the dipropylene glycol n-butyl ether. For example, the reactants may include at least 20% by weight of the dipropylene glycol n-butyl ether, such as at least 25% by weight of the dipropylene glycol n-butyl ether. In particular, the reactants may include not greater than 50% by weight of the dipropylene glycol n-butyl ether. Further, the reactants may include tripropylene glycol n-butyl ether in an amount in a range of 0% to 30% by weight, such as a range of 5% to 20% by weight, or even a range of 10% to 20% by weight. When the reactants that form the polyurethane include both dipropylene glycol n-butyl ether and tripropylene glycol n-butyl ether, the components may be included in a ratio (dipropylene glycol n-butyl ether/tripropylene glycol n-butyl ether) of at least 0.5, such as at least 1.0, or even at least 1.5. Alternatively, the reactants may include tripropylene glycol n-butyl ether as the only polypropylene glycol alkyl ether.
In addition, the reactants of the urethane resin may include an ester alcohol. For example, the ester alcohol may be a polyester polyol. In an exemplary embodiment, a polyester polyol is derived from dibasic acids such as adipic, glutaric, fumaric, succinic or maleic acid, or anhydrides and di-functional alcohols, such as ethylene glycol, diethylene glycol, propylene glycol, di or tripropylene glycol, 1-4 butane diol, 1-6 hexane diol, or any combination. For example, the polyester polyol may be formed by the condensation reaction of the glycol and the acid with the continuous removal of the water by-product. A small amount of high functional alcohol, such as glycerin, trimethanol propane, pentaerythritol, sucrose or sorbitol or polysaccarides may be used to increase branching of the polyester polyol. The esters of simple alcohol and the acid may be used via an ester interchange reaction where the simple alcohols are removed continuously like the water and replaced by one or more of the glycols above. Additionally, polyester polyols may be produced from aromatic acids, such as terephthalic acid, phthalic acid, 1,3,5-benzoic acid, their anhydrides, such as phthalic anhydride.
In a particular example, the ester alcohol may include an alkyl diol alkyl ester. For example, the alkyl diol alkyl ester may include trimethyl pentanediol isobutyrate, such as 2,2,4-trimethyl-1,3-pentanediol isobutyrate. In particular, desirable acoustic damping is observed when the ester alcohol includes trimethyl pentanediol isobutyrate and the ether alcohol includes dipropylene glycol n-butyl ether. Alternatively, advantages are exhibited when the ester alcohol includes trimethyl pentanediol isobutyrate and the ether alcohol includes dipropylene glycol n-butyl ether and tripropylene glycol n-butyl ether. In an exemplary embodiment, the reactants may include the ester alcohol, such as the alkyl diol alkyl ester, in a range of 1.0 wt % to 8.0 wt %, such as a range of 2.0 wt % to 6.0 wt %.
In a particular embodiment, the acoustic damping composition includes a binder resin and modifying resin that are immiscible. For example, the binder resin and modifying resin form separate phases when dried as a film. In particular, the acoustic damping composition may have a haze value as measured by ASTM D1003 (method B) of at least 30%, such as at least 50%.
In the acoustic damping composition, the binder resin and modifying resin may be included in a ratio (binder resin/modifying resin) in a range between 0.5 and 1.5. For example, the range may be between 0.8 and 1.3. In particular, the binder resin is an acrylic component and the modifying resin is a urethane component. As such, the ratio of acrylic component to urethane component is in a range between 0.5 and 1.5, such as a range between 0.8 and 1.3.
In addition, the acoustic damping composition may include elastomeric particles. In an example, the elastomeric particles may include a polyolefin rubber, a diene elastomer, a silicone rubber, or any combination thereof. For example, the polyolefin may include a homopolymer, a copolymer, a terpolymer, an alloy, or any combination thereof formed from a monomer, such as ethylene, propylene, butene, pentene, methyl pentene, octene, or any combination thereof. An exemplary polyolefin includes polyethylene, ethylene propylene copolymer, ethylene butene copolymer, polypropylene (PP), polybutylene, polypentene, polymethylpentene, polystyrene, ethylene octene copolymer, or any combination thereof. In particular, the polyolefin rubber may include polybutylene.
In another example, the elastomeric particles may include a diene elastomer. In an exemplary embodiment, the diene elastomer is a copolymer formed from at least one diene monomer. For example, the diene elastomer may be a copolymer of ethylene, propylene and diene monomer (EPDM). An exemplary diene monomer includes a conjugated diene, such as butadiene, isoprene, chloroprene, or the like; a non-conjugated diene including from 5 to about 25 carbon atoms, such as 1,4-pentadiene, 1,4-hexadiene, 1,5-hexadiene, 2,5-dimethyl-1,5-hexadiene, 1,4-octadiene, or the like; a cyclic diene, such as cyclopentadiene, cyclohexadiene, cyclooctadiene, dicyclopentadiene, or the like; a vinyl cyclic ene, such as 1-vinyl-1-cyclopentene, 1-vinyl-1-cyclohexene, or the like; an alkylbicyclononadiene, such as 3-methylbicyclo-(4,2,1)-nona-3,7-diene, or the like; an indene, such as methyl tetrahydroindene, or the like; an alkenyl norbornene, such as 5-ethylidene-2-norbornene, 5-butylidene-2-norbornene, 2-methallyl-5-norbornene, 2-isopropenyl-5-norbornene, 5-(1,5-hexadienyl)-2-norbornene, 5-(3,7-octadienyl)-2-norbornene, or the like; a tricyclodiene, such as 3-methyltricyclo (5,2,1,0.sup.2,6)-deca-3,8-diene or the like; or any combination thereof. In a particular embodiment, the diene includes a non-conjugated diene. In another embodiment, the diene elastomer includes alkenyl norbornene. The diene elastomer may include, for example, ethylene from about 63 wt % to about 95 wt % of the polymer, propylene from about 5 wt % to about 37 wt %, and the diene monomer from about 0.2 wt % to about 15 wt %, based upon the total weight of the diene elastomer. In a particular example, the ethylene content is from about 70 wt % to about 90 wt %, propylene from about 17 wt % to about 31 wt %, and the diene monomer from about 2 wt % to about 10 wt % of the diene elastomer. In general, the diene elastomer includes a small amount of a diene monomer, such as a dicyclopentadiene, a ethylnorbornene, a methylnorbornene, a non-conjugated hexadiene, or the like, and typically has a number average molecular weight of from about 50,000 to about 100,000. Exemplary diene elastomers are commercially available under the tradename NORDEL from Dow, such as NORDEL IP 4725P. In a particular example, the elastomeric material includes a blend of a diene elastomer and a polyolefin.
In another example, the elastomeric particles may include a silicone elastomer, such as a polyalkylsiloxane, a phenyl silicone, a fluorosilicone, or any combination thereof. For example, the silicone polymer may, for example, include polyalkylsiloxanes, such as silicone polymers formed of a precursor, such as dimethylsiloxane, diethylsiloxane, dipropylsiloxane, methylethylsiloxane, methylpropylsiloxane, or any combination thereof. In a particular embodiment, the polyalkylsiloxane includes a polydialkylsiloxane, such as polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS).
In particular, the elastomeric particles form a separate phase from the binder resin and modifying resin. The separate phase takes the form of distinct particles. For example, the elastomeric particles may have an average size of not greater than 850 micrometers. In an example, the average particle size is not greater than 600 micrometers, such as not greater than 450 micrometers, or even not greater than 250 micrometers. In a particular example, the average particle size is at least 1 micrometer, such as at least 10 micrometers.
The elastomeric particles may be formed of a material having a desirable modulus of elasticity. In an example, the elastomeric particles may be formed of a material having a modulus of elasticity of not greater than 20 MPa. For example, the modulus of elasticity may be in a range of 0.1 MPa to 20 MPa, such as a range of 0.1 MPa to 10 MPa.
In a particular example, the acoustic damping composition may include the elastomeric particles in an amount of 0.1 wt % to 50 wt %. For example, the acoustic damping composition may include the elastomeric particles in an amount of 0.1 wt % to 25 wt %, such as an amount of 3 wt % to 12 wt %.
In a further exemplary embodiment, the acoustic damping composition may include a second set of elastomeric particles. For example, the second set of elastomeric particles may have an average particle size of at least 580 micrometers, such as at least 840 micrometers. In particular, the average particle size of the second elastomeric particles may be greater than the first elastomeric particles. The second elastomeric particles may be included in the acoustic damping composition in amounts of 0.1 wt % to 7 wt %, such as amounts of 0.5 wt % to 5 wt %. The composition of the second elastomeric particles may be selected from the compositions disclosed above in relation to the first elastomeric particles. In particular, the second elastomeric particles may have a composition similar to the first elastomeric particles. Alternatively, the composition of the second elastomeric particles may be different than the composition of the first elastomeric particles.
In an exemplary embodiment, the acoustic damping composition may be prepared as a water-based emulsion including the binder resin, the modifying resin, and the elastomeric particles. In an example, the solids content of the water-based emulsion, including the binder resin and modifying resin, is at least 40%. For example, the solids content of the water-based emulsion may be at least 50%, such as least 60%, or even at least 65%. In addition, the water-based emulsion may have a desirable pH. For example, the pH may be in a range of 6.8 to 8.0, such as in a range of 7.0 to 7.5.
Further, the water-based emulsion may have a viscosity in a range of 1,000 cps to 500,000 cps. For example, the viscosity may be in a range of 1,000 cps to 100,000 cps, such as a range of 5,000 cps to 50,000 cps, as measured with a #6 spindle at 10 rpm. In particular, the viscosity may be in a range of 10,000 cps to 40,000 cps, such as a range of 20,000 cps to 35,000 cps. To control the viscosity, a thickening agent may be added to the water-based emulsion. For example, the thickener may be an anionic thickener or a nonionic thickener. In a further example, the thickener may be a cellulose-based or modified cellulose-based thickener, an associative thickener, an inverse emulsion thickener, or an alkali swellable emulsion thickener. Compositionally, the thickener may include polyacrylate or polymethacrylate, carboxylate, polyvinyl alcohol, polyacrylamide, or any combination thereof. In a particular example, the thickener includes an acrylate thickener. Further, the thickener may have an average molecular weight in a range of 30,000 to 70,000 atomic units, such as a range of 40,000 to 55,000 atomic units. The thickener may be included in an amount 0.1 wt % to 5 wt %.
Once deployed and dried, the acoustic damping composition exhibits desirable acoustic damping, such as a desirable Mode 1 Damping Parameter, a Mode 2 Damping Parameter, or a Mode 3 Damping Parameter. The Mode 1 Damping Parameter, Mode 2 Damping Parameter, and Mode 3 Damping Parameter are defined below in relation to the specified testing method of the Examples. In an example, the acoustic damping composition may have a Mode 1 Damping Parameter of at least 0.45. For example, the Mode 1 Damping Parameter may be at least 0.5, such as at least 0.55, at least 0.6, at least 0.65, or even at least 0.7. Further, the acoustic damping composition may have a Mode 2 Damping Parameter of at least 0.27, such as at least 0.30, or even at least 0.32. In addition, the acoustic damping composition may have a Mode 3 Damping Parameter of at least 0.27, such as at least 0.31.
In a further example, the acoustic damping composition may exhibit a desirable Damping Performance, defined as the percent increase in mode Damping Parameter determined in accordance with the testing method specified in the Examples relative to the noiseproofing compound that is commercially available under the tradename GREEN GLUE in August 2008 from The Green Glue Company of West Fargo, N. Dak. For example, the acoustic damping composition may have a Mode 1 Damping Performance of at least 20%, such as at least 30%, at least 40%, at least 50% or even at least 60%. In another example, the acoustic damping composition may have a Mode 2 Damping Performance of at least 20%, such as at least 30%, at least 40%, or even at least 50%. In an additional example, the acoustic damping composition may have a Mode 3 Damping Performance of at least 10%.
In addition, the acoustic damping composition may include a ceramic particulate having an average particle size of not greater than 100 micrometers. For example, the acoustic damping composition may include not greater than 50 wt % of the ceramic particulate, such as between 2 wt % and 25 wt % of the ceramic particulate. In an example, the ceramic particulate has an average particle size of not greater than 50 micrometers, such as not greater than 25 micrometers, or even not greater than 10 micrometers. In a particular example, the average particle size of the ceramic particulate may be less than 1 micrometer, such as less than 100 nanometers. For example, the ceramic particulate may include an aluminous ceramic, such as alumina trihydrate. In another example, the ceramic particulate may include silica, zirconia, titania, alumina, or any combination thereof.
In use, the acoustic damping composition may be disposed between two relatively flat rigid members. For example, the acoustic damping composition may be laminated between two rigid panels to form a construction panel for use in forming walls, ceilings, or floors. For example, the rigid panels may include wood, plywood, gypsum board, cement board, plaster board, wallboard, gyproc, sheetrock, or any combination thereof. In an example, the acoustic damping composition may be used to form a laminate for manufacturing walls. In another example, the acoustic damping composition may be disposed between subflooring and flooring. In a further example, the acoustic damping composition may be disposed between rigid members of a ceiling panel.
For example, as illustrated in
In particular, preformed laminates may be formed using the acoustic damping composition. For example, the acoustic damping composition may be applied to a surface of a first rigid panel. The surface of the second rigid panel is placed in contact with the acoustic damping composition that is in contact with a major surface with the first rigid panel to form the laminate.
Particular embodiments of the above described acoustic damping composition exhibit technical advantages. In particular, embodiments of the above described exhibit desirable damping of Mode 1, Mode 2 and Mode 3 vibrations. In addition, embodiments of the acoustic damping composition enhance acoustic damping, particularly after installation.
As illustrated in
Each of the acoustic damping compositions described below are tested for damping of Mode 1, Mode 2, and Mode 3 vibrations. In particular, the test procedure is described below. The output of the procedure provides Damping Parameters for Mode 1, Mode 2, and Mode 3 vibrations, respectively defined as the Mode 1 Damping Parameter, the Mode 2 Damping Parameter, and the Mode 3 Damping Parameter. As defined herein, Mode 1 is the fundamental mode of the long dimension of the test panel, Mode 2 is the 2nd order mode of the long dimension of the test panel, and Mode 3 is the fundamental mode of the narrow dimension of the panel.
To test the formulations, each formulation is applied between two layers of ½ inch thick drywall having dimensions 8″×24″ to form a panel. The formulations are applied using a 3/16 inch plastic V notch trowel. The panels are dried for approximately 30 days.
To test the panels, an acoustic testing apparatus 200 includes the panel 202 placed on a 2-inch thick pad of low density/low modules open cell polyurethane acoustic foam 204 having a density of approximately 1.7 lb/cuft, as illustrated in
While the low density/low modulus open cell polyurethane foam may contribute to some damping, the damping contribution of the foam is not more than 0.01 and as such, is determined to be low enough to not affect the results of the experiments below.
Formulations are prepared from water-based emulsions having a 62% solids content. Each formulation includes 100 parts binder resin (FLEXACRYL AF-2027, available from Air Products), 90 parts of a modifying resin described in Table 1, and 45 parts water. Each formulation is thickened to approximately 30,000 cps as measured with a #6 spindle at 10 rpm. The viscosity is adjusted using TEXIPOL 237, available from Scott Bader, UK. Ammonia is used to raise the pH to between 7 and 7.5.
Table 2 illustrates the mode frequencies for each sample, and Table 3 illustrates the damping parameter for each sample. The Texanol component provides improvement in Mode 1 damping. In particular, those samples including Texanol exhibit an average Mode 1 Damping Parameter of 0.7, while those samples without Texanol exhibit an average Mode 1 Damping Parameter of 0.62. In addition, the presence of DPnB provides some advantages, as does the combination of DPnB with TPnB. For example, formulas with the combination of DPnB and TPnB exhibit an average Mode 1 damping of 0.7 compared to an average Mode 1 damping of 0.63 without the combination. Further, the presence of DPnB correlates well with Mode 2 damping. Furthermore, the combination of DPnB, TPnB and Texanol provides and average Mode 1 Damping Parameter of 0.73, while formulas not having this entire combination average 0.64.
Three samples are prepared having different solids content. The formulations are thickened with TEXIPOL 253, available from Scott Bader, UK. Table 4 illustrates the resonance frequencies for the Modes 1, 2 and 3.
As the solid content increases, the location of the resonance modes appears to drop in frequency, implying a softer damping film. Such an effect may also reflect changes in the thickness of the damping film. While the same trowel is used for each sample, the higher solids samples have slightly thicker films. Thicker films tend to translate to softer film, all things being equal.
Table 5 illustrates the effect of damping for each of the modes. As illustrated, the Mode 1 Damping Parameter increases with increasing solids content. However, Mode 3 damping appears to decrease with increasing solids content while the Mode 3 Damping Parameter undergoes a maximum around 65% solids.
Samples are prepared using different thickeners. In particular, samples are prepared using TEXIPOL 253, TEXIPOL 237, and TEXIPOL 258, available from Scott Bader, UK. The samples are prepared in accordance with Sample 3 of Example 1.
As illustrated in Table 6, only slight differences are exhibited in the resonance frequencies of the modes. As illustrated in Table 7, the thickener provides a large change in damping parameter, particularly the Mode 1 Damping Parameter.
Commercially available acoustic damping compositions are tested for comparison with a sample formed in a manner similar to the samples of Example 1. The samples are tested using the testing method described above with the exception that the test panel is suspended instead of placing it on the foam. Three different samples of QuietGlue® formulations that were acquired over a period of 2 years between 2006 and 2008 are tested. QuietGlue® is commercially available from Quiet Solution of Sunnyvale, Calif. In addition, GREEN GLUE acquired August 2008, available from Green Glue Company of West Fargo, N. Dak., is tested. As illustrated in Table 8, each of the commercially available compositions has a Mode 1 Damping Parameter 0.38 or less. In addition, the samples exhibit low Mode 2 Damping Parameters and low Mode 3 Damping Parameters. In contrast, the sample formed in a manner similar to the samples of Example 1 exhibits a Mode 1 Damping Parameter of at least 0.62 and a Mode 2 Damping Parameter of at least 0.42, far exceeding the damping parameters of the commercially available compositions. In particular, a Damping Performance, defined as the percent increase in damping parameter relative to the GREEN GLUE product as of August 2008, is at least 20% for Mode 1 and Mode 2, such as at least 30%, at least 40%, or even at least 50%.
Samples are prepared using the Formulation #3 of Example 1 with the addition of EPDM particles of 20 mesh size (<841 microns). The EPDM particles are added in amounts of 3%, 7%, 11%, or 16% by weight.
As illustrated in Table 9, the Mode 1 Damping Parameter decreases slightly with increasing EPDM particle content.
An acoustic damping composition is formed using the Formulation #3 of Example 1 and EPDM particles of 40 mesh size (<420 microns). As illustrated in Table 10, the Mode 1 damping parameter drops less significantly with increasing amounts of EPDM particles, when using EPDM particles of a smaller size than exemplified by the samples of Example 4. (With increasing amounts).
An acoustic damping composition is prepared in accordance with Formulation #3 of Example 1 with the addition of polybutylene particles having an average particle size of 60 mesh (<250 microns). In contrast to the samples of Examples 5 and 6, the acoustic damping represented by the Mode 1 Damping Parameter increases, exhibiting a maximum around 3%, as illustrated in Table 11. In addition, the Mode 2 Damping Parameter increases with increasing content of the polybutylene particles.
Table 12 illustrates the Mode Damping Parameters for each of the particle types when included in a sample at 7%, based on the Formulation #3 of Example 1. As illustrated, both the 30 mesh natural rubber and 60 mesh polybutylene exhibit improvements in Mode 1 Damping Parameter over the formulations that include no rubber. Further, the 60 mesh polybutylene sample exhibits an increase in the Mode 2 Damping Parameter.
In a first embodiment, an acoustic damping composition includes a binder resin including an addition polymer having a carboxylic functional group, a urethane component, and first elastomeric particles. In an example of the first embodiment, the first elastomeric particles have a modulus of elasticity of not greater than 20 MPa, such as in a range of 0.1 MPa to 20 MPa, or in a range of 0.1 MPa to 10 MPa. In another example, the composition includes 0.1 wt % to 50 wt % of the first elastomeric particles, such as 0.1 wt % to 25 wt % of the first elastomeric particles, or 3.0 wt % to 12 wt % of the first elastomeric particles.
In a further example of the first embodiment, the average particle size of the first elastomeric particles is not greater than 850 micrometers, such as not greater than 600 micrometers, not greater than 450 micrometers, or not greater than 250 micrometers. The average particle size may be at least 1 micrometer.
In an additional example of the first embodiment, the elastomeric particles include a polyolefin rubber, such as polybutylene. In another example, the elastomeric particles include a diene elastomer, such as ethylene propylene diene elastomer. In a further example, the elastomeric particles include a silicone rubber.
In another example of the first embodiment, the acoustic damping composition also includes second elastomeric particles having an average particle size of at least 580 micrometers. The second elastomeric particles have a particle size greater than the first elastomeric particles. For example, the second elastomeric particles have an average particle size of at least 840 micrometers. The composition may include 0.1 wt % to 7 wt % of the second elastomeric particles, such as 0.5 wt % to 5 wt % of the second elastomeric particles.
The acoustic damping composition of the first embodiment may have a Mode 1 Damping Parameter of at least 0.45, such as at least 0.5, at least 0.55, or even at least 0.6. The acoustic damping composition may have a Mode 2 Damping Parameter of at least 0.27, such as at least 0.30, or at least 0.32. The acoustic damping composition may have a Mode 3 Damping Parameter of at least 0.27, such as at least 0.31. The acoustic damping composition may have a Mode 1 Damping Performance of at least 20% or a Mode 2 Damping Performance of at least 20%.
In a further example of the first embodiment, the binder resin and the urethane component are included in a water-based emulsion.
In a second embodiment, a construction panel includes first and second rigid panels and an acoustic damping composition disposed between the first and second rigid panels. The acoustic damping composition includes a urethane component, elastomeric particles, and a binder resin including an addition polymer having a carboxylic functional group. In an example of the second embodiment, the elastomeric particles have a modulus of elasticity of not greater than 20 MPa. In another example, the acoustic damping composition has a Mode 1 Damping Parameter of at least 0.45.
In a third embodiment a method of preparing a construction panel includes applying an acoustic damping composition to a first major surface of a first rigid panel. The acoustic damping composition includes a urethane component, elastomeric particles, and a binder resin including an addition polymer having a carboxylic functional group. The method further includes contacting a first major surface of a second panel to the acoustic damping composition. In an example of the third embodiment, the elastomeric particles have a modulus of elasticity of not greater than 20 MPa. In another example, the acoustic damping composition has a Mode 1 Damping Parameter of at least 0.45.
In a fourth embodiment, an acoustic damping composition includes a binder resin and first elastomeric particles. The binder resin includes an addition polymer having a carboxylic functional group. The binder resin has a glass transition temperature of not greater than −25° C. In an example of the fourth embodiment, the glass transition temperature is not greater than −40° C., such as not greater than −50° C. In a further example of the fourth embodiment, the acoustic damping composition has a haze of at least 30%.
In an additional example of the fourth embodiment, the first elastomeric particles have a modulus of elasticity of not greater than 20 MPa. In another example, the acoustic damping composition includes 0.1 wt % to 50 wt % of the first elastomeric particles. In a further example the average particle size of the first elastomeric particles is not greater than 450 micrometers. In an additional example, the first elastomeric particles include a polyolefin rubber. Alternatively, the first elastomeric particles include a diene elastomer. In a further alternative, the first elastomeric particles include a silicone rubber.
In a further example, the acoustic damping composition further includes second elastomeric particles having an average particle size of at least 580 micrometers. The second elastomeric particles have a particle size greater than the first elastomeric particles.
In another example, the acoustic damping composition has a Mode 1 Damping Parameter of at least 0.45. In an additional example, the acoustic damping composition has a Mode 2 Damping Parameter of at least 0.27. In a further example, the acoustic damping composition has a Mode 3 Damping Parameter of at least 0.27.
In an additional example, the acoustic damping composition further includes a urethane component. For example, the binder resin and the urethane component can be included in a water-based emulsion.
Note that not all of the activities described above in the general description or the examples are required, that a portion of a specific activity may not be required, and that one or more further activities may be performed in addition to those described. Still further, the order in which activities are listed are not necessarily the order in which they are performed.
In the foregoing specification, the concepts have been described with reference to specific embodiments. However, one of ordinary skill in the art appreciates that various modifications and changes can be made without departing from the scope of the invention as set forth in the claims below. Accordingly, the specification and figures are to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense, and all such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of invention.
As used herein, the terms “comprises,” “comprising,” “includes,” “including,” “has,” “having” or any other variation thereof, are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion. For example, a process, method, article, or apparatus that comprises a list of features is not necessarily limited only to those features but may include other features not expressly listed or inherent to such process, method, article, or apparatus. Further, unless expressly stated to the contrary, “or” refers to an inclusive-or and not to an exclusive-or. For example, a condition A or B is satisfied by any one of the following: A is true (or present) and B is false (or not present), A is false (or not present) and B is true (or present), and both A and B are true (or present).
Also, the use of “a” or “an” are employed to describe elements and components described herein. This is done merely for convenience and to give a general sense of the scope of the invention. This description should be read to include one or at least one and the singular also includes the plural unless it is obvious that it is meant otherwise.
Benefits, other advantages, and solutions to problems have been described above with regard to specific embodiments. However, the benefits, advantages, solutions to problems, and any feature(s) that may cause any benefit, advantage, or solution to occur or become more pronounced are not to be construed as a critical, required, or essential feature of any or all the claims.
After reading the specification, skilled artisans will appreciate that certain features are, for clarity, described herein in the context of separate embodiments, may also be provided in combination in a single embodiment. Conversely, various features that are, for brevity, described in the context of a single embodiment, may also be provided separately or in any subcombination. Further, references to values stated in ranges include each and every value within that range.
The present application claims priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/168,466, filed Apr. 10, 2010, entitled “ACOUSTIC DAMPING COMPOSITIONS HAVING ELASTOMERIC PARTICULATE,” naming inventor Brian Ravnaas, which application is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3489242 | Gladding et al. | Jan 1970 | A |
3615961 | Meyer | Oct 1971 | A |
3658635 | Eustice | Apr 1972 | A |
3770560 | Elder et al. | Nov 1973 | A |
3894169 | Miller | Jul 1975 | A |
4299639 | Bayer | Nov 1981 | A |
4416790 | Schurmann et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
5004764 | Yamamoto et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5102924 | Williams et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5318837 | Yoshinaka et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5328957 | Sorathia et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5400296 | Cushman et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5691021 | Kobe | Nov 1997 | A |
5695867 | Saitoh et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5858521 | Okuda et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5923002 | McGrath et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
6006484 | Geissbuhler | Dec 1999 | A |
6022616 | Wu et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6060553 | Lenczyk et al. | May 2000 | A |
6077613 | Gaffigan | Jun 2000 | A |
6211320 | Dershem et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6228939 | Wang et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6267347 | Ryan et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6319969 | Walther et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6340519 | Tanaka et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6498547 | Morita | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6528563 | Kaiser et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6789645 | Deblander | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6920723 | Downey | Jul 2005 | B2 |
7019102 | Schoenfeld et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7022746 | Lockwood et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7025852 | Kumakura | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7094811 | Nodelman et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7181891 | Surace et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7263028 | Thomas et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7893149 | Hermes et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7893151 | Johnson et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
8028800 | Ravnaas | Oct 2011 | B2 |
20010009393 | Morita | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010018228 | Kumakura | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20020004538 | Kaiser et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020037381 | Ohira et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020160131 | Ohira et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030207491 | Kumakura | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040082721 | Miura et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040113483 | Sylvester et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20050094311 | Boss et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050126851 | Ikebe et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060003104 | Chao et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060052474 | Czerny | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060118355 | Blomeling et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060154078 | Watanabe et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060165977 | Rehfeld et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060173103 | Schmidt | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060183858 | Takesada et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060214341 | Sugiura et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070012509 | Shimada et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070065668 | Idei | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070088103 | Poncet | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070101679 | Harthcock et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070160851 | Barancyk et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070224395 | Rowitsch et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080001431 | Thompson et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080083497 | Dublineau et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080153969 | Hermes et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080249241 | Heiliger et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080250751 | Pavan et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090013506 | Mizuhara et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090121174 | Johnson et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090305595 | Ogawa et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090325446 | Hori et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100230206 | Tinianov et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102004016099 | Oct 2005 | DE |
0621931 | Jul 1997 | EP |
0897675 | Feb 1999 | EP |
0588563 | Mar 1999 | EP |
0965701 | Dec 1999 | EP |
1031671 | Aug 2000 | EP |
0966495 | Jul 2002 | EP |
1408075 | Apr 2004 | EP |
1161494 | Apr 2005 | EP |
1160387 | Sep 2005 | EP |
970392 | Sep 1964 | GB |
2136063 | Sep 1984 | GB |
S63-193977 | Aug 1988 | JP |
H01-139634 | Jun 1989 | JP |
H01-204954 | Aug 1989 | JP |
05-032844 | Feb 1993 | JP |
H05-032844 | Feb 1993 | JP |
H06-073228 | Mar 1994 | JP |
07-090126 | Apr 1995 | JP |
H07-090126 | Apr 1995 | JP |
H10-141434 | May 1998 | JP |
H11-30566 | Feb 1999 | JP |
2972186 | Nov 1999 | JP |
2001-040165 | Feb 2001 | JP |
2002-544353 | Dec 2002 | JP |
2003-244788 | Aug 2003 | JP |
2004-250461 | Sep 2004 | JP |
2004-269839 | Sep 2004 | JP |
2004250461 | Sep 2004 | JP |
2005-089017 | Apr 2005 | JP |
2006-152020 | Jun 2006 | JP |
2006152020 | Jun 2006 | JP |
2008133460 | Jun 2008 | JP |
2008-169382 | Jul 2008 | JP |
2008-174701 | Jul 2008 | JP |
9208856 | May 1992 | WO |
9315333 | Aug 1993 | WO |
9520820 | Aug 1995 | WO |
9731549 | Sep 1997 | WO |
9733051 | Sep 1997 | WO |
9919398 | Apr 1999 | WO |
9924520 | May 1999 | WO |
0048832 | Aug 2000 | WO |
0049085 | Aug 2000 | WO |
0069946 | Nov 2000 | WO |
0109078 | Feb 2001 | WO |
0116231 | Mar 2001 | WO |
0123466 | Apr 2001 | WO |
0139969 | Jun 2001 | WO |
0144136 | Jun 2001 | WO |
0220687 | Mar 2002 | WO |
02061010 | Aug 2002 | WO |
03087252 | Oct 2003 | WO |
2004063268 | Jul 2004 | WO |
2005035679 | Apr 2005 | WO |
2005100709 | Oct 2005 | WO |
2005118733 | Dec 2005 | WO |
2006032802 | Mar 2006 | WO |
2006092560 | Sep 2006 | WO |
2006116440 | Nov 2006 | WO |
2006131138 | Dec 2006 | WO |
2007017422 | Feb 2007 | WO |
2007019450 | Feb 2007 | WO |
2007053410 | May 2007 | WO |
2007054699 | May 2007 | WO |
2007070771 | Jun 2007 | WO |
2007084318 | Jul 2007 | WO |
2007149613 | Dec 2007 | WO |
2008002842 | Jan 2008 | WO |
2008005936 | Jan 2008 | WO |
2008057664 | May 2008 | WO |
2008115301 | Sep 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“Elastomers,” Obtained Mar. 21, 2015, Polymers International Australia, http://polymers.com.au/elastomers/. |
“Chapter 16. Polymers. Characteristics, Applications, and Processing,” Obtained Mar. 21, 2015, University of Virginia, http://www.virginia.edu/bohr/mse209/chapter16.htm. |
J.R. Herrera-Velarde, R. Zenit, D. Chehata, and B. Mena, “The Flow of Non-Newtonian Fluids Around Bubbles and its Connection to the Jump Discontinuity,” Mar. 13, 2003, http://iusti.polytech.univ-mrs.fr/˜gep/doctorants/chehata/publiperso/herrera—etal—JNNFM—2002.pdf. |
Zheng, Zhu et al.; “Elastomeric Reactive Microgels as Toughner for Epoxy Adhesives,” Chinese Journal of Polymer Science, 1987, vol. 5, pp. 76-80. |
Texanol, Case No. 25265-77-4; UNEP Publications; IRPTC Data Profile, Identifiers, Physical and Chemical Properties pp. 73-117. |
International Search Report from PCT/U52010/030586 dated Nov. 26, 2010, 1 pg. |
International Search Report from PCT/US2010/030587 dated Nov. 26, 2010, 1 pg. |
Wang, Horng-Jou et al., “Vibration and damping analysis of a three-layered composite annular plate with a viscoelastic mid-layer,” Composite Structures, Dec. 2002, pp. 563-570, vol. 58, No. 4, Elsevier Science Ltd. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100261023 A1 | Oct 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61168466 | Apr 2009 | US |