The present invention relates to methods and devices for acoustic-electric imaging.
Organs such as the heart, the skeletal muscles, and the brain are continuously traveled by electrical impulses that carry the information in the neurons, or that trigger muscle or myocardial contraction. It is extremely important to be able to image the propagation of these impulses in order to diagnose many diseases and to understand brain mechanisms through functional exploration of the brain.
Acoustic-electric imaging exploits the interaction between ultrasound and electric currents to determine the value of the electric current at points of interaction between ultrasound and tissue, typically at the focal spot of a focused ultrasonic wave.
U.S. Pat. No. 8,057,390 discloses an example of an acoustic-electric imaging method, in which focused ultrasonic waves are emitted so as to form an image of the current, line by line. This acquisition process is slow, and all the more so because, as the resulting electrical signals are very weak, a high level of averaging is required. Low frame rates are therefore obtained.
Kuchment et al., in “Synthetic focusing in ultrasound modulated tomography,” Inverse problem and imaging, 2009-10-01, pages 1-9, XP055116447, proposed a method for synthetic acoustic-electric imaging, in which the transducers emit spherical waves, one by one. The result is a slow process. In addition, the incident ultrasonic waves have too low of an amplitude.
The present invention is intended to overcome this disadvantage.
To this end, the invention proposes a method for acoustic-electric imaging, comprising:
(a) a measurement step during which an array of transducers Ti emits, in a field of view of a medium to be imaged, a number N at least equal to 2 of incident ultrasonic waves l that are not focused in the field of view and that have different wavefronts, each incident ultrasonic wave being emitted by a plurality of transducers Ti among the array of transducers, where N is at least equal to 2 and less than 100, and at least one electric sensor, in contact with the medium to be imaged, captures raw electrical signals Erawl(t) respectively during the propagation of the incident waves l,
(b) an image formation step, during which an image of the medium comprising a map of the electric currents (in other words, a map of the electrical values representative of local current densities at each point of the medium) is determined from the raw electrical signals Erawl(t) obtained in step (a).
With these arrangements, one can obtain ultrafast imaging of electrical impulses in the medium observed, and possibly film the propagation of electrical impulses deep in the tissue in real time and at a millimeter resolution.
In various embodiments of the method according to the invention, one or more of the following arrangements may possibly be used:
The invention also relates to a device for implementing a method for acoustic-electric imaging, comprising an array of transducers Ti, least one electric sensor, and control and processing means adapted for:
(a) causing an array of transducers Ti to emit, in a medium to be imaged, a number N of unfocused incident ultrasonic waves l having different wavefronts, each incident ultrasonic wave being emitted by a plurality of transducers Ti among the array of transducers, N being at least equal to 2 and less than 100, and causing at least one electric sensor, in contact with the medium to be imaged, to capture raw electrical signals Erawl(t) respectively during the propagation of the incident waves l,
(b) determining an image of the medium, comprising a map of the electric currents, from the raw electrical signals Erawl(t).
Other features and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following description of one of its embodiments, given by way of non-limiting example and with reference to the accompanying drawings.
In the drawings:
In the various figures, the same references designate identical or similar elements.
The medium 1 to be imaged may consist in particular of tissues of a patient or an animal, in particular muscle (myocardium or other) or brain.
The imaging device comprises, for example:
a computer 4 or the like for controlling the electronics bay 3 and for viewing ultrasound images obtained from said captured signals.
The transducer array 2 may, for example, be a linear array formed by a set of transducers placed next to one another along an axis X, with the Z axis perpendicular to the X axis denoting the depth direction in the field of view. In what follows, the transducers will be denoted Ti, where i is an index indicating the position of each transducer along the axis X. The following description uses this type of transducer array 2 for its example, but other forms of transducer array are also possible within the scope of the invention, including two-dimensional arrays.
The device further comprises at least one electric sensor El (
The number of electric sensors El used is relatively low, generally less than 10, preferably less than 5, and usually 1.
As represented in
Note that the n+1 analog-to-digital converters 5 (A/Di-A/De) may be identical, which is also the case for the n+1 buffers 6 (Bi-Be), so that the device used may simply be a device as conventionally used in ultrafast acoustic imaging.
This device allows implementing a method of acoustic-electric imaging of the medium 1, which in particular includes the following steps, carried out by the central processing unit 8 assisted by the processor 8 and the digital signal processor 10:
The transducer array 2 and the electric sensor El are placed in contact with the medium 1 and a number N of incident ultrasonic waves is emitted into medium 1 by the transducers Ti (N may be for example between 2 and 100, in particular between 5 and 10). The incident waves in question are unfocused (more specifically, not focused in the field of view) and have different respective wavefronts, meaning wavefronts of different shapes and/or different orientation. Advantageously, the incident waves are plane or divergent waves whose respective wavefronts F (the wavefront F of a single wave is represented in
The incident waves are generally pulses of less than a microsecond, typically about 1 to 10 cycles of the ultrasonic wave at the center frequency. The firing of incident waves may be space apart, for example by about 50 to 200 microseconds.
Each incident wave encounters reflectors in the medium 1, which reverberate the incident wave. The reverberated ultrasonic wave is captured by the transducers Ti of the array. The signal thus captured by each transducer Ti comes from the medium 1 as a whole, since the incident wave is not focused at emission. Similarly, the electric sensor El captures an electrical signal E(t) during propagation of the incident ultrasonic wave, and this electrical signal results from the interaction between the incident wave and the medium 1 to be imaged, along the entire line represented by the wavefront, at each measurement time.
Reverberant signals captured by the n transducers Ti are then digitized by the corresponding analog-to-digital converters A/Di and stored in the corresponding buffers Bi, while the electrical signal is digitized by the analog-to-digital converter A/De and stored in the corresponding buffer Be. These signals stored in the buffers after each incident firing will be referred to hereinafter as raw data. These raw data consist of n+1 raw time signals RFrawl,i(t) and Erawl(t) respectively captured by the transducers Ti and the electric sensor El after the firing l of incident ultrasonic waves.
After each firing l of incident waves, the signals stored in the buffers Bi-Be are transferred to the memory 9 of the signal processor 10 for processing by said processor. At the end of step (a), the memory 9 therefore contains N arrays (vectors) of n+1 raw signals.
Step (a) is repeated at a fast rate, such as 500 Hz or more, which is made possible by the low number N of incident waves used to obtain an image.
Two methods will be explained below for carrying out this step (b).
b1) First Method: Synthesis of Coherent Data:
From N arrays of raw data, a number M of arrays (vectors) of synthetic coherent data is calculated by the processor 8, respectively at M points Pk(x,z) of the field of view (k being an integer between 1 and M, and x, z being the coordinates of point Pk on the X, Z axes). Each of these M vectors of synthetic coherent data contains n time signals RFcoherentk,i(t) corresponding to the signals which would respectively be captured by the transducers Ti if the transducers were emitting an incident wave focused at point Pk.
The arrays of coherent data may be obtained for example by assuming a uniform propagation speed c for ultrasonic compression waves throughout the medium 1, according to the principle explained in particular in document EP2101191 or in the article by Montaldo et al.: “Coherent plane-wave compounding for very high frame rate ultrasonography and transient elastography” (IEEE Trans Ultrasound Ferroelectr Freq Control 2009 March; 56(3): 489-506).
As the direction of propagation of the plane wave corresponding to the each firing l is known, and the propagation speed v is known, the processor 8 can calculate for each point Pk the propagation time τec(l,k) of the incident wave l to point Pk, and the propagation time τrec(l,k,i) of the reverberated wave from point Pk to the transducer Ti, therefore the total round trip travel time τ(l,k,i)=τec(l,Pk)+(l,Pk,i).
The spatially coherent acoustic signal for transducer Ti, corresponding to virtual focal point Pk, is then calculated using the formula:
where B(l) is a weighting function for the contribution of each firing l of incident waves (in the current cases, the values of B(l) may all be equal to 1). This signal RFcoherentkij presents a single value for each point Pk.
In the same manner, one can calculate a coherent electrical signal Ecoherentk:
This electrical value is the one that would be measured by the electric sensor El if an incident ultrasonic wave focused at Pk had been emitted, particularly if a sufficient number of incident waves are emitted to obtain an acoustic-electric image, for example 40 to 100 incident waves to obtain a high-resolution image.
These values Ecoherentk are representative of the electric currents at the points Pk, in the same manner as the electrical values captured in the known acoustic-electric imaging methods mentioned above, and therefore provide a map of the electric currents within the field of view.
The arrays of coherent data RFcoherentk and possibly the values Ecoherentk may then possibly be refined by correcting the effects of aberrations in the medium 1, for example as described for example in patent EP2101191 or in the document by Montaldo et al: “Coherent plane-wave compounding for very high frame rate ultrasonography and transient elastography” (IEEE Trans Ultrasound Ferroelectr Freq Control 2009 March; 56(3): 489-506).
The electric current map can be presented on the screen of the computer 4, possibly superimposed on a B-mode ultrasound image of the medium 1 or on some other image of said medium 1, in particular an ultrasound image obtained from the arrays Ecoherentk by beamforming in receive mode, for example as explained in said document EP2101191.
b2) Second Method: Radon and Wavelet Transform:
From the electrical signals Erawk(t), it is also possible to send directly the local values of electric currents at the points Pk, as will be explained below.
The raw electrical signal Erawk(t) can be modeled as follows:
Erawk=∫volumeKρJ(x,y,z)ΔP(x,y,z)dxdydz (2)
where:
K is an interaction constant on the order of 10−9 Pa−1,
ρ is the resistivity of the medium,
ΔP is the pressure variation,
y is a coordinate along a Y axis perpendicular to plane (X, Z), and
J is the density distribution of the detected current, in other words the scalar product of the current density vector times the electrode sensitivity vector of the electrodes of the electric sensor El.
As the ultrasonic wave emitted is a pulse plane wave, ΔP(x,y,z) can be configured as a function of the emission angle θ and the time t. By ignoring the direction Y, we have:
ΔP(x,z)=ΔP(−q sin θ+ct cos θ,q cos θ+ct sin θ),
where q and ct are coordinates respectively in the direction of the wave front F and in the direction of propagation V.
By considering the emitted ultrasonic wave as a Dirac impulse, meaning an infinitely short impulse, the acoustic-electrical signal becomes:
or equivalently:
where R[J] is the Radon transform.
In practice, the incident wave is not a Dirac impulse but an impulse signal of finite frequency band, which will result in a convolution relative to variable ct of the Radon transform:
where W(ct) is the waveform emitted and {circle around (x)} is the convolution product.
For example, a typical ultrasound emission produces the following convolution kernel:
where n and m can be adjusted within the frequency band of the transducer. This convolution kernel is equivalent to a ridgelet transform [E. J. Candes, “Ridgelets: theory and applications,” Stanford University, 1998] of the current density distribution.
In practice, m=n and this convolution kernel becomes a ridgelet decomposition with the following parameters: a=nλ, b=ct and θ.
The ridgelet decomposition has several mathematical properties, such as a Parseval-Plancherel relation, a reconstruction formula, a sparse representation of slowly varying objects far from linear discontinuities, and can be expressed as a composition of a wavelet transform and the Radon transform.
More specifically, by denoting the wavelet and ridgelet transforms as WT[.] and RT[.] respectively, it can be demonstrated that
Inversions of the wavelet transform and Radon transform are well-known problems. Exact inversions exist, respectively WT−1 and R−1 for these two transforms, and we therefore have:
In practice, the inversion occurs in two steps: first, inverting the wavelet transform WT, then inverting the Radon transform R.
This provides a current density map across the entire field of view (area swept by the incident waves) within the medium to be imaged, and does so after very fast acquisition, allowing real-time monitoring of very rapid electrical phenomena by obtaining an actual movie of the propagation of electrical impulses.
It is also desirable to maximize the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), the resolution, and the frame rate.
One approach is to emit the incident waves in the form of the shortest possible impulses, thereby optimizing the resolution. However, this corresponds to emitting very low energy and therefore a low SNR.
It is also possible to divide the frequency band into sub-bands corresponding to longer emissions (and therefore more energy). In theory, there is a resulting increase in the SNR, but with a decrease in the frame rate (because it takes multiple emissions to form an image).
Lastly, a third approach involves emitting a “chirp” which can be used to perform the impulse compression. This approach maximizes the SNR while maintaining the frame rate.
The SNR can also be improved by limiting the effect of noise. Because the ridgelet transform is a sparse basis which represents the current density distribution with a small number of large coefficients and a large number of small coefficients, noise can be eliminated simply by applying a threshold to the signals obtained. A first approach consists of thresholding to eliminate the ‘small’ coefficients. Otherwise, it is also possible to use the physics of the problem. For example, the coefficients primarily containing noise can be identified by cross-correlation between windows of signals received for two emissions of opposite polarities. In addition, these signals can be subtracted to eliminate systemic artifacts.
Several techniques exist for inversion of the Radon transform. The most common is probably filtered back projection, which involves the application of a ramp filter before the back projection (corresponding to the beamforming). To avoid this step, which increases the noise level, it is also possible to emit the incident ultrasonic waves in the form of a suitable impulse which includes this filter. Other strategies such as compressed sensing are also suitable.
In addition, the arrays RFcoherentk can be calculated as explained above in method b1), in order to further form a two-dimensional (B-mode) ultrasound image of the field of view by beamforming in receive mode, as explained for example in said document EP2101191.
This B-mode ultrasound image (or some other image, possibly ultrasound) of the field of view may possibly be superimposed on the previously determined map of electrical values, and both the ultrasound image of the medium and the electric current map can be displayed on the computer 4 screen.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
13 57178 | Jul 2013 | FR | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/FR2014/051880 | 7/21/2014 | WO | 00 |