1. Technical Field
The invention relates to built-in vacuum cleaning systems in which a power unit containing a motor and a debris collection system is connected to various wall outlets through piping extending throughout the building. More particularly, the invention relates to such a power unit and to a sound reducer mounted in the unit to enhance the cooling and reduce the sound of the vacuum supplying motor mounted in the unit.
2. Background Information
Built-in vacuum cleaning systems are well-known in the building and cleaning industry and consists of a main power unit usually mounted in the basement or a garage for proper air circulation. The power unit contains a motor and a debris collection receptacle with various filters. When the motor is turned on, it creates a suction or vacuum at a plurality of wall outlets for drawing in dust and debris which is carried through tubing located in the walls of the building to the power unit where it is subsequently filtered and the cleaned air exhausted either to the outside or to a specific area in the building. Some examples of these in-wall vacuum cleaning systems are shown in U.S. Pat. Nos. 2,943,698 and 4,938,309. One problem with these types of systems is that the size of the motor required to generate the desired amount of vacuum can be relatively noisy when in operation which is annoying to the user thereof. Also it is desirable to provide adequate cooling for the motor to provide maximum efficiency and long motor life.
Thus, there has been a need to reduce the sound transmitted by the air vacuum motor by providing the unit with various types of sound dampening means while providing optimum cooling of the motor. Some examples of prior art systems having sound reducing means are shown in U.S. Pat. Nos. 2,731,194, 2,948,210, 4,786,299, 4,938,309, and 5,400,463. Although some of these cleaning systems and power units may have successfully dampened a certain amount of sound transmitted to the surrounding environment by the use of foam inserts, increased sound reduction is always desirable and with a less expensive and less complicated and bulky sound reducer than heretofore believed available. Also such foam inserts should not reduce the cooling of the motor by blocking the air passages thereto. The present invention is believed to achieve this result by the unique sound reducers described herein below.
One aspect of the present invention is to provide an improved power unit for a vacuum cleaning system having a unique sound reducer mounted therein which increases the effectiveness of dampening the amount of sound produced by the vacuum producing motor mounted within the unit without materially affecting the cooling air flow for the motor.
Another feature of the present invention is to provide an improved sound reducer which is formed of an acoustic foam insert mounted within the unit having a single central opening for receiving a portion of the motor therein, wherein the sound reducer provides a plurality of irregularly-shaped sound wave passages to assist in dampening the amount of sound transmitted externally of the power unit into the surrounding environment.
A further feature of the present invention is to form the sound reducer which is mounted within the power unit of three components, namely a circular base formed with a central opening and a pair of partitions formed of the same foam material and preferably secured on the base by an adhesive.
Still another aspect of the present invention is to mount the sound reducer in the unit on an annular liner or ring mounted on the inside wall of the power unit for supporting the sound reducer base and partitions thereof, eliminating the need for expensive mounting arrangements for the sound reducer.
These objections and advantages are obtained by the improved power unit of the present invention, the general nature of which may be stated as comprising a canister having a side wall, top and bottom walls, a first compartment which houses a motor and a second compartment for collecting debris; an acoustic foam sound reducer mounted in the first compartment having a single central opening for receiving a portion of the motor therein; said sound reducer having first and second spaced partitions extending about a portion of the central opening and forming a plurality of passages communicating with said central opening to breakup sound waves generated by the motor and provide for the movement of cooling air therethrough.
These objectives and advantages are further obtained by the improved sound reducer of the present invention which comprises a circular base of acoustic foam formed with a single central opening adapted to receive a portion of the motor therein; a first piece of acoustic foam mounted on the circular base having a curved surface located concentrically with respect to the central opening; and a second piece of acoustic foam mounted on the base, said second piece having a curved surface located concentrically with respect to the central opening, said acoustic foam piece forming a plurality of air passages communicating with the central opening to dispense sound waves generated by the motor and providing cooling air for the motor.
A preferred embodiment of the invention, illustrated of the best mode in which Applicant contemplates applying the principles, is set forth in the following description and is shown in the drawings and is particularly and distinctly pointed out and set forth in the appended claims.
Similar numbers refer to similar parts throughout the drawings.
A first embodiment of the improved sound reducer and power unit containing the same is shown in
A vacuum producing motor 13 is mounted in motor compartment 7 and usually communicates with an exhaust tube 15 which extends to the outside of the building or have a muffler or other device mounted thereon for controlling the exhaust air after it has been cleaned by the filters within compartment 9. Motor compartment 7 is separated from debris compartment 9 by various types of walls or partitions 17 which also may supply the structural support for motor 13. All of these components are well-known in the art, examples of which may be found in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,591,368, 4,938,309, 5,400,463, 6,237,186, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
The first embodiment of sound reducer 1 is shown in
As shown in
A modified or second embodiment sound reducer is indicated generally at 50, and is shown particularly in
Second embodiment 50 also is formed of three separate components, base 51 and partitions 55 and 57, each of which is an acoustic foam material such as the non-reticulated polyester foam as are the components of sound reducer 1. Also as shown in
When partitions 55 and 57 are mounted on base 51, a pair of linear passages 63 (
Sound reducer 50 is mounted in the upper portion of motor compartment 7 as shown in
A third embodiment of the improved sound reducer is indicated generally at 75, and is shown in
Again, sound reducer 75 is preferably formed of three separate components of the same material discussed previously, and with arcuate partitions 77 and 78 being secured on the top surface 86 of base 76 by an adhesive or other type of attachment means. Again, base 76 is formed with a central opening 87 similar to openings 25 and 53 discussed above, for receiving the circular top portion 27 of motor 13 therein. Also, as shown in
In summary, the improved sound reducers 1, 50 and 75 provide a very inexpensive yet highly efficient means of reducing the sound level produced by the motor of an in-wall vacuum cleaning power unit by forming the sound reducers of three simple components of an acoustic foam, two of which are mounted on a disc-shaped base preferably by an adhesive, which partitions form a plurality of sound passages which will break up the sound waves thereby reducing the sound level produced by the power unit motor. Preferably, all three components are formed of the same material to assist in the cost reduction and ease of manufacture. However the partitions could be formed of a different foam material than that of the base if desired without affecting the concept of the invention. Also, the general shapes of the partitions as shown in the drawings and discussed above could vary somewhat without affecting the sound reduction performance of the sound reducers, although the two embodiments shown in the drawings and described above have been proven to produce satisfactory results.
Also, the passageways formed by the sound reducers provide for the flow of the cooling air to the vacuum unit motor through the lid vents for subsequent exhaust to the surrounding atmosphere through vent openings formed in the canister body. Thus, in addition to providing the desired sound reduction, the sound reducers assist in supplying cooling air to the motor to provide for a cooler running motor thereby increasing its life and operational efficiency.
In the foregoing description, certain terms have been used for brevity, clearness, and understanding. No unnecessary limitations are to be implied therefrom beyond the requirement of the prior art because such terms are used for descriptive purposes and are intended to be broadly construed.
Moreover, the description and illustration of the invention is an example and the invention is not limited to the exact details shown or described.
This application is a continuation-in-part of pending U.S. Ser. No. 29/205,218, filed May 11, 2004.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2328236 | Stoner | Aug 1943 | A |
2731194 | Kent | Jan 1956 | A |
2748883 | Ralph | Jun 1956 | A |
2907405 | Marshall | Oct 1959 | A |
2943698 | Bishop | Jul 1960 | A |
2948210 | Conlan | Aug 1960 | A |
3898063 | Gazan | Aug 1975 | A |
4015683 | Williams | Apr 1977 | A |
4356591 | Lude | Nov 1982 | A |
4435877 | Berfield | Mar 1984 | A |
4786299 | DeMarco | Nov 1988 | A |
4938309 | Emdy | Jul 1990 | A |
D337914 | McDonald | Aug 1993 | S |
5248323 | Stevenson | Sep 1993 | A |
5293664 | Lim et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5297990 | Renz et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5400463 | Attard et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5513417 | Kim et al. | May 1996 | A |
5548867 | Hwang et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5720074 | Lee | Feb 1998 | A |
5737797 | Rittmueller et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5765257 | Steger et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5784946 | Malosh et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5894114 | Eigenmann | Apr 1999 | A |
5919030 | Iwatake et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
D417534 | Holston et al. | Dec 1999 | S |
D421359 | Liao | Mar 2000 | S |
6094774 | Larsen et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
D494331 | Nieschwitz et al. | Aug 2004 | S |
6804857 | Olewiler, III | Oct 2004 | B1 |
20040083572 | Song | May 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060070797 A1 | Apr 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 29205218 | May 2004 | US |
Child | 11260527 | US |