Acoustic panel

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11186988
  • Patent Number
    11,186,988
  • Date Filed
    Friday, September 9, 2016
    8 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, November 30, 2021
    3 years ago
  • Inventors
    • Mosiadz; Maciej Grzegorz
  • Original Assignees
  • Examiners
    • Cajilig; Christine T
    Agents
    • Tarolli, Sundheim, Covell & Tummino LLP
Abstract
Acoustic panels, grids for acoustic panels, suspended ceiling systems and a method for producing an acoustic panel, especially a man-made vitreous fibre (MMVF) panel, having a first major face and an opposite second major face, with the first major face comprising a facing with a surface coating. To provide high light reflection the coating comprises microspheres.
Description
RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application is a U.S. National Stage application under 35 USC 371 of PCT Application Serial No. PCT/EP2016/071378, filed on 9 Sep. 2016; which claims priority from EP Patent Application No. 15020158.0, filed 11 Sep. 2015, the entirety of both of which are incorporated herein by reference.


The invention relates to acoustic panels, grids for acoustic panels, suspended ceiling systems and a method for producing an acoustic panel, especially a man-made vitreous fibre (MMVF) panel, having a first major face and an opposite second major face, with the first major face comprising a facing with a surface coating.


Acoustic correction is an important part of creating good indoor environments, and this is of increasing concern, e.g. in open plan offices, schools and hospitals. Noise is a disturbing factor, which may have a negative influence on health and productivity. Acoustic panels can be used to achieve high level of acoustical comfort.


However in some cases acoustic panels are left out of consideration because the present panels have a surface, which is less than optimum in terms of light reflection.


US2007/0277948 A1 discloses an acoustical tile that includes a core and a surface treatment.


US3908059 discloses a ceiling tile that has a decorative face produced by applying a binder and a vast plurality of minute expandable plastic particles to patterned areas of the tile face and then applying heat to expand the particles and/or dry the binder.


According to a first aspect of the present invention it is an object to provide an acoustic panel with a high light reflection and still having acoustic performance.


This object is achieved by the surface coating comprising microspheres.


The microspheres may be made of silica, ceramics or glass. Choice of material for the microspheres may be influenced by cost, demand for strength or processing equipment.


The diameter of the microspheres may be chosen to fit the purpose, depending on the demands on e.g. acoustics, ease of cleaning, cost, whiteness, processing equipment etc. As an example the average diameter may be in the interval 10-200 μm, for example 10-120 μm, such as 15-70 μm. Generally a lower average diameter may give a more smooth texture, whereas a higher average diameter may reduce gloss. Microspheres with a relatively high average diameter may be more fragile and put constraints on the process equipment.


The microspheres provide high light reflection. The effect is comparable with a “bath foam effect”; although the bubbles are colourless, the surface curvature assures a white appearance. In some embodiments the effect may be further enhanced by adding pigment to the microspheres. Alternatively or supplementary the microspheres may have a surface coating or surface treatment.


A further advantage is that the microspheres hide the structure of the surface. Often front facings are directional in that e.g. fibres of the facing are predominantly directed in one direction, and this can often be seen in prior art panels. This means that the installer installing the panels must be careful to align all panels making up e.g. a suspended ceiling in the same direction. This is time consuming, and hence adds to the cost of the final ceiling. If adjacent panels are not aligned to have the same direction, it may have a negative effect on the aesthetics of the room.


Furthermore the microspheres are found to make the surface coating of the surface more robust, thereby making the surface coating more easy to clean.


According to an embodiment, the facing is a non-woven or a felt having an air permeability of 400-900 I/m2/s. Air permeability in this range is found to provide a good compromise between a closed surface with optimum visual quality in terms of smoothness, light reflection etc and an open surface to provide acoustic performance, in particular sound absorption. The facing may be based on glass fibres, which have a favourable reaction to fire, whereas in other cases the facing may be based on for example plastic fibres to provide a softer facing, or a combination of plastic fibres and glass fibres. The facing may include a pigment or dye to provide the colour wanted, e.g. to provide a white facing with an L-value of at least 95.


An aspect of the invention relates to a suspended ceiling grid comprising a surface coating on surfaces visible in the installed state of the suspended ceiling. The surface coating comprises microspheres, which have the effect that the light reflection of the grid surfaces is comparable with the light reflection of the panels. Further it is found that the microspheres make the coated surface more robust and thus easier to clean.


A further aspect of the invention relates to a suspended ceiling system comprising an acoustic panel as defined above and a grid as outlined above.


Another aspect of the invention relates to a method for producing an acoustic panel comprising the steps of providing an acoustic panel, especially a MMVF panel, attaching a front facing to a first major face of the panel, applying a surface coating on the front facing, the surface coating comprises microspheres, and that prior to applying the surface coating, the surface coating is conditioned to have a viscosity of 20-40 s DIN CUP4.


This specific viscosity range is found to provide a suitable compromise of ease of application of the surface coating, good coverage of the surface, while providing a coating, which will not be too detrimental on the acoustic properties of the panels, especially with regard to sound absorption. In some cases a more narrow range of 28-38 s DIN CUP4 may be appropriate.


The microspheres are typically balls of ceramics, glass or silica with vacuum or air filled, and hence the microspheres are relatively light (generally e.g. 0.2 kg/dm3). Due to the light weight of such microspheres, there is a tendency that the microspheres will migrate to the top of a tank containing the coating. Hence the surface coating is conditioned e.g. by mixing or stirring to have a homogeneous viscosity in tank, e.g. with a maximum variation in viscosity of 10% in the coating.


According to an embodiment the surface coating is applied using a low viscosity coating technique, such as using rollers, brushes, spray nozzles or curtain coating.





The invention will be described in the following by way of example with reference to the drawings in which:



FIG. 1 is a sketch of a panel,



FIG. 2 is a close-up photo of a coated surface,



FIG. 3 is a photo of a coated surface,



FIG. 4 is a sketch showing the principles in room acoustics, and



FIG. 5 is a sketch showing the principles in sound absorption of acoustic panels.



FIG. 6 is a sketch showing a ceiling system comprising an acoustic panel, as shown in FIG. 1, and a grid comprising a surface coating on surfaces visible in the installed state of the suspended ceiling.





In the sketch of FIG. 1 is seen a panel (1) having a first major face (2) and an opposite second major face. The first major face (2) is provided with a facing, such as a non-woven or felt.


Microspheres (3) of the coating can be seen in the close-up photo of FIG. 2. As can be seen a number of the microspheres are situated in the surface providing the optical effect and giving a high light reflection and robustness of the surface coating.



FIG. 3 is a photo of the surface of the panel, and it can be seen that the coating covers the surface in a way to conceal any directional nature of the facing or subsurface. Further it can be seen that the surface is highly irregular and matt. Irregularity of the surface and the existence of small pinholes in the surface coating safeguards the acoustic performance of the panel.


In the sketch of FIG. 4 is illustrated how the acoustic performance of a room is influenced by external sound sources, and further by sound in the room reflected by the floor, walls and ceiling.



FIG. 5 shows how incident sound may be absorbed in an acoustic panel if the incident sound is allowed to penetrate into the panel through the first major face (2), whereas some of the sound may be reflected back into the room.


Scrub Testing

A test to determine wet-scrub resistance of coated ceiling panels was carried out. Test samples were 430×110×6 mm panels of MMVF with a facing and coating including microspheres. The test was performed on an Erichsen scrub resistance tester in compliance with PN-EN ISO 11998:2007 requirements, however a soft PU sponge and not a brush, was used as a scrub body. The appearance of the coatings was assessed after 100, 200 and 500 cycles. Rating scale 1-5 was used to describe test results (1=Best, 5=Worst):

    • Class 1—minute changes visible,
    • Class 2—small thickness loss overall entire surface, no clearances to the surface, visible gloss loss, minute runs,
    • Class 3—visible thickness loss and clearances to the surface, significant gloss changes and runs,
    • Class 4—significant loss of a coating thickness and in some areas a panel surface becomes visible,
    • Class 5—the panel surface damages (up to 100%).


As can be seen in the table below the sample showed excellent scrub resistance.












TABLE 4








Results after 100
Results after 200
Results after 500



scrub cycles
scrub cycles
scrub cycles















Quality

Quality

Quality


Sample
Appearance
class
Appearance
class
Appearance
Class





Acoustic panel
No changes
1
Shine, minute
2
Shine, minute
2





thickness

thickness






loss

loss









Sound Absorption Test

A sample measuring 1200×600×20 mm was tested for sound absorption according to BS EN ISO 354:2003 with very favourable results. Sound absorption coefficient of αw=1.00 was reached (Class A), calculated to EN ISO 11654:1997 and NRC 0.95 calculated to ASTM C 423-01.


Light Reflection Testing

Measurement of light reflection of a sample of a panel provided with a coating with microspheres was performed. Spectral reflection was measured using a Perkin-Elmer Lambda 900 spectrophotometer equipped with an integrating sphere, geometry 8°/d. Reflection values, including and excluding specular components, was measured in steps of 5 nm from 380 up to and including 780 nm. From the results the X, Y, Z, x, y and L*, a* and b* coordinates were derived for a light source D65 and an observer of 10° (ISO 7724).


Additionally diffusivity measurements were executed with calibration in “including specular component” modus, while the actual measurement were executed in the “excluding specular components” modus. By doing so the amount of diffuse reflected light compared to the total amount of reflected light is measured.


Gloss was measured using a BYK-trigloss multiangle gloss measuring device. This device projects a light beam onto the sample's surface and measures the intensity of the specular reflected light. The angle can be chosen 20°, 60° or 85°. The intensity of the reflected light beam is expressed in gloss units.












TABLE 1







Sample, acoustic panel
L*



















Reflection, including specular
94.91



gloss, average




Reflection, excluding specular
94.57



gloss, average




















TABLE 2







Sample, acoustic panel
L*/L* incl gloss (%)









Diffuse reflection, average
99.78




















TABLE 3







Sample, acoustic panel
Gloss (gloss units)



Measuring angle
Average



















20°
1.2



60°
1.7



85°
0.2










Diffusivity is very high, and the very high diffusivity is confirmed by the results of the gloss measurements, which show extremely low values.


With the high light reflection and low gloss the panels provide more light in a room equipped with the panels, and thereby the cost of lighting may be reduced, and further the living conditions are improved with a positive influence on the mood and productivity of people in the room.

Claims
  • 1. Acoustic panel, especially a man-made vitreous fibre (MMVF) panel, having a first major face and an opposite second major face, with the first major face comprising a facing with a surface coating, wherein the surface coating comprises microspheres, wherein the average diameter of the microspheres is in the interval of 10-200 μm; wherein the facing is a non-woven or a felt having an air permeability of 400-900 l/m2/s;wherein the surface coating includes pinholes.
  • 2. Acoustic panel according to claim 1, wherein the microspheres are made of silica, ceramic or glass.
  • 3. Acoustic panel according to claim 1, wherein the average diameter of the microspheres is in the interval of 10-120 μm.
  • 4. Acoustic panel according to claim 1, wherein the panel is a MMVF panel having a density in the range of 40-150 kg/m3.
  • 5. Acoustic panel according to claim 1, wherein the facing is based on glass fibres.
  • 6. Suspended ceiling system comprising an acoustic panel according to claim 1 and a grid comprising a surface coating on surfaces visible in the installed state of the suspended ceiling, wherein the surface coating comprises microspheres.
  • 7. Method for producing an acoustic panel comprising the steps of: providing an acoustic panel, especially a MMVF panel, attaching a front facing to a first major face of the panel, applying a surface coating on the front facing, wherein the surface coating comprises microspheres and pinholes, wherein the facing is a non-woven or felt having an air permeability of 400-900 l/m2/s and wherein prior to applying the surface coating, the surface coating is conditioned to have a viscosity of 20-40 s DIN CUP4.
  • 8. Method according to claim 7, wherein the surface coating is applied using a low viscosity coating technique.
  • 9. Suspended ceiling system according to claim 6 wherein the average diameter of the microspheres of the surface coating of the grid is in the interval of 10-200 μm.
  • 10. Acoustic panel according to claim 1, wherein the microspheres include a pigment.
  • 11. Acoustic panel according to claim 1, having an NRC value of at least 0.95.
  • 12. Acoustic panel according to claim 1, wherein the facing is white with an L-value of at least 95.
  • 13. A highly-reflective, low gloss acoustic panel comprising: a man-made vitreous fibre (MMVF) panel having a first major surface and a second major surface;a facing attached to the first major surface, the facing comprising a non-woven or a felt having an air permeability of 400-900 l/m2/s; anda coating applied to the facing, the coating including microspheres having an average diameter of 10-200 μm and pinholes, which collectively provide the panel with high light diffusivity and low gloss.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
15020158 Sep 2015 EP regional
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/EP2016/071378 9/9/2016 WO 00
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO2017/042372 3/16/2017 WO A
US Referenced Citations (29)
Number Name Date Kind
3357516 Cadotte Dec 1967 A
3859110 Foster Jan 1975 A
3908059 Prince Sep 1975 A
4283457 Kolsky Aug 1981 A
4545165 Carey Oct 1985 A
5602221 Bennett Feb 1997 A
5620795 Haak Apr 1997 A
5683798 Bennett Nov 1997 A
5869166 Caldwell Feb 1999 A
6558369 Rosenblum May 2003 B2
8337976 Mayers Dec 2012 B2
9856638 Emborg Jan 2018 B2
20010047629 Andersen Dec 2001 A1
20020007910 Bennett Jan 2002 A1
20020170467 Naji Nov 2002 A1
20040137181 Ruid Jul 2004 A1
20070277948 Carbo et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070289238 Payne Dec 2007 A1
20090126886 Englert May 2009 A1
20090173570 Levit Jul 2009 A1
20100083838 Togashi Apr 2010 A1
20110076470 Zaveri Mar 2011 A1
20110147119 Cao Jun 2011 A1
20120076983 Yu Mar 2012 A1
20120103723 Pieper May 2012 A1
20120329898 Weikel Dec 2012 A1
20140250811 Krause Sep 2014 A1
20140251856 Larsson Sep 2014 A1
20140271440 Constantz Sep 2014 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (2)
Number Date Country
29817995 Jan 1999 DE
59091050 May 1984 JP
Non-Patent Literature Citations (3)
Entry
Machine translation of DE 29817995 U1.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 16, 2016 for corresponding International Application No. PCT/EP2016/071378.
Jiqing, Wang (2001), “Architectural Hall Acoustic Quality Design”, p. 90, and English translation thereof.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20180251976 A1 Sep 2018 US