Acoustic resonators and filters with reduced temperature coefficient of frequency

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 12028040
  • Patent Number
    12,028,040
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, March 10, 2022
    2 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, July 2, 2024
    5 months ago
Abstract
Acoustic resonator devices and filters. An acoustic resonator includes a substrate and a lithium niobate plate. A back surface of the lithium niobate plate faces the substrate. A portion of the lithium niobate plate forms a diaphragm that spans a cavity in the substrate. An interdigital transducer (IDT) is on a front surface of the lithium niobate plate such that interleaved fingers of the IDT are on the diaphragm. The IDT and the lithium niobate plate are configured such that a radio frequency signal applied to the IDT excites a shear primary acoustic mode within the diaphragm. Euler angles of the lithium niobate plate are [0°, β, 0° ], where β is greater than or equal to 40° and less than or equal to 70°.
Description
NOTICE OF COPYRIGHTS AND TRADE DRESS

A portion of the disclosure of this patent document contains material which is subject to copyright protection. This patent document may show and/or describe matter which is or may become trade dress of the owner. The copyright and trade dress owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent disclosure as it appears in the Patent and Trademark Office patent files or records, but otherwise reserves all copyright and trade dress rights whatsoever.


BACKGROUND
Field

This disclosure relates to radio frequency filters using acoustic wave resonators, and specifically to filters for use in communications equipment.


Description of the Related Art

A radio frequency (RF) filter is a two-port device configured to pass some frequencies and to stop other frequencies, where “pass” means transmit with relatively low signal loss and “stop” means block or substantially attenuate. The range of frequencies passed by a filter is referred to as the “pass-band” of the filter. The range of frequencies stopped by such a filter is referred to as the “stop-band” of the filter. A typical RF filter has at least one pass-band and at least one stop-band. Specific requirements on a passband or stop-band depend on the application. For example, a “pass-band” may be defined as a frequency range where the insertion loss of a filter is better than a defined value such as 1 dB, 2 dB, or 3 dB. A “stop-band” may be defined as a frequency range where the rejection of a filter is greater than a defined value such as 20 dB, 30 dB, 40 dB, or greater depending on application.


RF filters are used in communications systems where information is transmitted over wireless links. For example, RF filters may be found in the RF front-ends of cellular base stations, mobile telephone and computing devices, satellite transceivers and ground stations, IoT (Internet of Things) devices, laptop computers and tablets, fixed point radio links, and other communications systems. RF filters are also used in radar and electronic and information warfare systems.


RF filters typically require many design trade-offs to achieve, for each specific application, the best compromise between performance parameters such as insertion loss, rejection, isolation, power handling, linearity, size and cost. Specific design and manufacturing methods and enhancements can benefit simultaneously one or several of these requirements.


Performance enhancements to the RF filters in a wireless system can have broad impact to system performance. Improvements in RF filters can be leveraged to provide system performance improvements such as larger cell size, longer battery life, higher data rates, greater network capacity, lower cost, enhanced security, higher reliability, etc. These improvements can be realized at many levels of the wireless system both separately and in combination, for example at the RF module, RF transceiver, mobile or fixed sub-system, or network levels.


High performance RF filters for present communication systems commonly incorporate acoustic wave resonators including surface acoustic wave (SAW) resonators, bulk acoustic wave (BAW) resonators, film bulk acoustic wave resonators (FBAR), and other types of acoustic resonators. However, these existing technologies are not well-suited for use at the higher frequencies and bandwidths proposed for future communications networks.


The desire for wider communication channel bandwidths will inevitably lead to the use of higher frequency communications bands. Radio access technology for mobile telephone networks has been standardized by the 3GPP (3rd Generation Partnership Project). Radio access technology for 5th generation (5G) mobile networks is defined in the 5G NR (new radio) standard. The 5G NR standard defines several new communications bands. Two of these new communications bands are n77, which uses the frequency range from 3300 MHz to 4200 MHZ, and n79, which uses the frequency range from 4400 MHz to 5000 MHz. Both band n77 and band n79 use time-division duplexing (TDD), such that a communications device operating in band n77 and/or band n79 use the same frequencies for both uplink and downlink transmissions. Bandpass filters for bands n77 and n79 must be capable of handling the transmit power of the communications device. WiFi bands at 5 GHz and 6 GHz also require high frequency and wide bandwidth. The 5G NR standard also defines millimeter wave communication bands with frequencies between 24.25 GHz and 40 GHz.


The Transversely-Excited Film Bulk Acoustic Resonator (XBAR) is an acoustic resonator structure for use in microwave filters. The XBAR is described in U.S. Pat. No. 10,491,291, titled TRANSVERSELY EXCITED FILM BULK ACOUSTIC RESONATOR. An XBAR resonator comprises an interdigital transducer (IDT) formed on a thin floating layer, or diaphragm, of a single-crystal piezoelectric material. The IDT includes a first set of parallel fingers, extending from a first busbar and a second set of parallel fingers extending from a second busbar. The first and second sets of parallel fingers are interleaved. A microwave signal applied to the IDT excites a shear primary acoustic wave in the piezoelectric diaphragm. XBAR resonators provide very high electromechanical coupling and high frequency capability. XBAR resonators may be used in a variety of RF filters including band-reject filters, band-pass filters, duplexers, and multiplexers. XBARs are well suited for use in filters for communications bands with frequencies above 3 GHz.





DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1A includes a schematic plan view, two schematic cross-sectional views, and a detail view of a transversely-excited film bulk acoustic resonator (XBAR). FIG. 1B is cross-sectional view of an XBAR according to an alternative aspect.



FIG. 2 is a schematic block diagram of a bandpass filter implemented with XBARs.



FIG. 3 is a graph of possible combinations of piezoelectric coupling and temperature coefficient of velocity for lithium niobate.



FIG. 4 is a graph of piezoelectric coupling and temperature coefficient of velocity as functions of Euler angle β for lithium niobate.



FIG. 5 is a graph of the input-output transfer function of a filter with reduced temperature coefficient of frequency.



FIG. 6 is a graph of possible combinations of piezoelectric coupling and temperature coefficient of velocity for lithium tantalate.



FIG. 7 is a graph of piezoelectric coupling and temperature coefficient of velocity as functions of Euler angle β for lithium tantalate.





Throughout this description, elements appearing in figures are assigned three-digit or four-digit reference designators, where the two least significant digits are specific to the element and the one or two most significant digit is the figure number where the element is first introduced. An element that is not described in conjunction with a figure may be presumed to have the same characteristics and function as a previously-described element having the same reference designator.


DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Description of Apparatus



FIG. 1A shows a simplified schematic top view and orthogonal cross-sectional views of an XBAR 100. XBAR resonators such as the resonator 100 may be used in a variety of RF filters including band-reject filters, band-pass filters such as the bandpass filter 110, duplexers, and multiplexers.


The XBAR 100 is made up of a thin film conductor pattern formed on a surface of a piezoelectric plate 110 having substantially parallel front and back surfaces 112, 114, respectively. The piezoelectric plate is a thin single-crystal layer of a piezoelectric material such as lithium niobate, lithium tantalate, lanthanum gallium silicate, gallium nitride, or aluminum nitride. The piezoelectric plate is cut such that the orientation of the X, Y, and Z crystalline axes with respect to the front and back surfaces is known and consistent. The piezoelectric plate may be Z-cut, which is to say the Z axis is normal to the front and back surfaces 112, 114. The piezoelectric plate may be rotated Z-cut or rotated YX-cut. XBARs may be fabricated on piezoelectric plates with other crystallographic orientations.


The back surface 114 of the piezoelectric plate 110 is attached to a surface of a substrate 120 except for a portion of the piezoelectric plate 110 that forms a diaphragm 115 spanning a cavity 140 formed in the substrate. The portion of the piezoelectric plate that spans the cavity is referred to herein as the “diaphragm” 115 due to its physical resemblance to the diaphragm of a microphone. As shown in FIG. 1A, the diaphragm 115 is contiguous with the rest of the piezoelectric plate 110 around all of a perimeter 145 of the cavity 140. In this context, “contiguous” means “continuously connected without any intervening item”. In other configurations, the diaphragm 115 may be contiguous with the piezoelectric plate around at least 50% of the perimeter 145 of the cavity 140.


The substrate 120 provides mechanical support to the piezoelectric plate 110. The substrate 120 may be, for example, silicon, sapphire, quartz, or some other material or combination of materials. The back surface 114 of the piezoelectric plate 110 may be bonded to the substrate 120 using a wafer bonding process. Alternatively, the piezoelectric plate 110 may be grown on the substrate 120 or attached to the substrate in some other manner. The piezoelectric plate 110 may be attached directly to the substrate or may be attached to the substrate 120 via one or more intermediate material layers 122 as shown in FIG. 1B, for example.


“Cavity” has its conventional meaning of “an empty space within a solid body.” The cavity 140 may be a hole completely through the substrate 120 (as shown in Section A-A and Section B-B) or a recess in the substrate 120 under the diaphragm 115. The cavity 140 may be formed, for example, by selective etching of the substrate 120 before or after the piezoelectric plate 110 and the substrate 120 are attached.


The conductor pattern of the XBAR 100 includes an interdigital transducer (IDT) 130. The IDT 130 includes a first plurality of parallel fingers, such as finger 136, extending from a first busbar 132 and a second plurality of fingers extending from a second busbar 134. The first and second pluralities of parallel fingers are interleaved. The interleaved fingers overlap for a distance AP, commonly referred to as the “aperture” of the IDT. The center-to-center distance L between the outermost fingers of the IDT 130 is the “length” of the IDT.


The first and second busbars 132, 134 serve as the terminals of the XBAR 100. A radio frequency or microwave signal applied between the two busbars 132, 134 of the IDT 130 excites a primary acoustic mode within the piezoelectric plate 110. The primary acoustic mode is a bulk shear mode where acoustic energy propagates along a direction substantially orthogonal to the surface of the piezoelectric plate 110, which is also normal, or transverse, to the direction of the electric field created by the IDT fingers. Thus, the XBAR is considered a transversely-excited film bulk wave resonator.


The IDT 130 is positioned on the piezoelectric plate 110 such that at least the fingers of the IDT 130 are disposed on the diaphragm 115 that spans, or is suspended over, the cavity 140. As shown in FIG. 1A, the cavity 140 has a rectangular shape with an extent greater than the aperture AP and length L of the IDT 130. A cavity of an XBAR may have a different shape, such as a regular or irregular polygon. The cavity of an XBAR may more or fewer than four sides, which may be straight or curved.


For ease of presentation in FIG. 1A, the geometric pitch and width of the IDT fingers is greatly exaggerated with respect to the length (dimension L) and aperture (dimension AP) of the XBAR. A typical XBAR has more than ten parallel fingers in the IDT 110. An XBAR may have hundreds, possibly thousands, of parallel fingers in the IDT 110. Similarly, the thicknesses of the IDT fingers and the piezoelectric plate in the cross-sectional views are greatly exaggerated.


Referring now to the detailed schematic cross-sectional view, a front-side dielectric layer 150 may optionally be formed on the front side of the piezoelectric plate 110. The “front side” of the XBAR is, by definition, the surface facing away from the substrate. The front-side dielectric layer 150 may be formed only between the IDT fingers (e.g. IDT finger 138b) or may be deposited as a blanket layer such that the dielectric layer is formed both between and over the IDT fingers (e.g. IDT finger 138a). The front-side dielectric layer 150 may be a non-piezoelectric dielectric material, such as silicon dioxide, alumina, or silicon nitride. A thickness of the front side dielectric layer 150 is typically less than about one-third of the thickness of the piezoelectric plate 110. The front-side dielectric layer 150 may be formed of multiple layers of two or more materials. In some applications, a back-side dielectric layer (not shown) may be formed on the back side of the piezoelectric plate 110.


The IDT fingers 138a, 138b may be one or more layers of aluminum, an aluminum alloy, copper, a copper alloy, beryllium, gold, tungsten, molybdenum or some other conductive material. The IDT fingers are considered to be “substantially aluminum” if they are formed from aluminum or an alloy comprising at least 50% aluminum. The IDT fingers are considered to be “substantially copper” if they are formed from copper or an alloy comprising at least 50% copper. Thin (relative to the total thickness of the conductors) layers of other metals, such as chromium or titanium, may be formed under and/or over and/or as layers within the fingers to improve adhesion between the fingers and the piezoelectric plate 110 and/or to passivate or encapsulate the fingers and/or to improve power handling. The busbars (132, 134 in FIG. 1A) of the IDT may be made of the same or different materials as the fingers.


Dimension p is the center-to-center spacing or “pitch” of the IDT fingers, which may be referred to as the pitch of the IDT and/or the pitch of the XBAR. Dimension w is the width or “mark” of the IDT fingers. The geometry of the IDT of an XBAR differs substantially from the IDTs used in surface acoustic wave (SAW) resonators. In a SAW resonator, the pitch of the IDT is one-half of the acoustic wavelength at the resonance frequency. Additionally, the mark-to-pitch ratio of a SAW resonator IDT is typically close to 0.5 (i.e. the mark or finger width is about one-fourth of the acoustic wavelength at resonance). In an XBAR, the pitch p of the IDT is typically 2 to 20 times the width w of the fingers. In addition, the pitch p of the IDT is typically 2 to 20 times the thickness of the piezoelectric plate 210. The width of the IDT fingers in an XBAR is not constrained to be near one-fourth of the acoustic wavelength at resonance. For example, the width of XBAR IDT fingers may be 500 nm or greater, such that the IDT can be readily fabricated using optical lithography. The thickness of the IDT fingers may be from 100 nm to about equal to the width w. The thickness of the busbars (132, 134) of the IDT may be the same as, or greater than, the thickness tm of the IDT fingers.



FIG. 2 is a schematic circuit diagram and layout for a high frequency band-pass filter 200 using XBARs. The filter 200 has a conventional ladder filter architecture including three series resonators 210A, 210B, 210C and two shunt resonators 220A, 220B. The three series resonators 210A, 210B, and 210C are connected in series between a first port and a second port (hence the term “series resonator”). In FIG. 2, the first and second ports are labeled “In” and “Out”, respectively. However, the filter 200 is bidirectional and either port may serve as the input or output of the filter. The two shunt resonators 220A, 220B are connected from nodes between the series resonators to ground. A filter may contain additional reactive components, such as inductors, not shown in FIG. 2. All the shunt resonators and series resonators are XBARs. The inclusion of three series and two shunt resonators is exemplary. A filter may have more or fewer than five total resonators, more or fewer than three series resonators, and more or fewer than two shunt resonators. Typically, all of the series resonators are connected in series between an input and an output of the filter. All of the shunt resonators are typically connected between ground and the input, the output, or a node between two series resonators.


In the exemplary filter 200, the three series resonators 210A, B, C and the two shunt resonators 220A, B of the filter 200 are formed on a single plate 230 of piezoelectric material bonded to a silicon substrate (not visible). Each resonator includes a respective IDT (not shown), with at least the fingers of the IDT disposed over a cavity in the substrate. In this and similar contexts, the term “respective” means “relating things each to each”, which is to say with a one-to-one correspondence. In FIG. 2, the cavities are illustrated schematically as the dashed rectangles (such as the rectangle 235). In this example, each IDT is disposed over a respective cavity. In other filters, the IDTs of two or more resonators may be disposed over a single cavity.


Each of the resonators 210A, 210B, 210C, 220A, 220B in the filter 200 has resonance where the admittance of the resonator is very high and an anti-resonance where the admittance of the resonator is very low. The resonance and anti-resonance occur at a resonance frequency and an anti-resonance frequency, respectively, which may be the same or different for the various resonators in the filter 200. In over-simplified terms, each resonator can be considered a short-circuit at its resonance frequency and an open circuit at its anti-resonance frequency. The input-output transfer function will be near zero at the resonance frequencies of the shunt resonators and at the anti-resonance frequencies of the series resonators. In a typical filter, the resonance frequencies of the shunt resonators are positioned below the lower edge of the filter's passband and the anti-resonance frequencies of the series resonators are position above the upper edge of the passband.


The primary acoustic mode in an XBAR is a shear mode in which atomic displacements in the piezoelectric plate are lateral (i.e. parallel to the surfaces of the piezoelectric plate) but vary in a vertical direction. The direction of acoustic energy flow of the excited primary shear acoustic mode is substantially orthogonal to the surfaces of the piezoelectric plate.


The resonance frequency of an XBAR is proportional to the velocity of the shear primary acoustic mode in the diaphragm, and roughly inversely proportional to the diaphragm thickness. The resonance frequency of an XBAR is also dependent on the pitch and mark of the IDT fingers. In some broadband filters, a dielectric frequency setting layer, indicated by the broken rectangle 240, may be formed on the front and/or back surfaces to increase the diaphragm thickness above the thickness of the piezoelectric plate. This lowers the resonance frequencies of the shunt resonators relative to the resonance frequencies of the series resonators.


The shear wave velocity and the diaphragm thickness are both temperature dependent, with the temperature coefficient of shear wave velocity (TCV) being the dominant factor in the temperature dependence of resonance frequency.


The difference between the resonance and anti-resonance frequencies of an XBAR is determined, in part, by the electro-mechanical coupling between the electric field and the primary shear wave. This coupling depends on piezoelectric coupling coefficient e15. e15 is an element of a 3×6 matrix of piezoelectric coupling coefficients that describe the physical response of a piezoelectric material to an applied electric field. A larger value of e15 results in more efficient coupling to the primary shear acoustic mode, which results in wider spacing between the resonance and anti-resonance frequencies of an XBAR.



FIG. 3 is a chart 300 of possible combinations of piezoelectric coupling coefficient e15 and temperature coefficient of velocity TCV for all possible orientations of a lithium niobate crystal. Euler angles are a system, introduced by Swiss mathematician Leonhard Euler, to define the orientation of a body with respect to a fixed coordinate system. The orientation is defined by three successive rotations about angles α, β, and γ. The shaded area 310 contains the values of e15 and TCV for all possible combinations of angles α, β, and γ. The dashed line 320 is the locus of (e15, TCV) values for lithium niobate piezoelectric plates with Euler angles (0°, β, 0°) where 0≤β≤180°.



FIG. 4 is a chart 400 of piezoelectric coupling coefficient e15 and temperature coefficient of velocity TCV as functions of Euler angle β for lithium niobate with Euler angles (0°, β, 0°). Specifically, the solid curve 410 is a plot of TCV versus β. The solid curve 410 is read against the left-hand axis. TCV is expressed in part per million per degree Celsius (ppm/° C.). The dashed curve 420 is a plot of e15 versus β. The dashed curve 420 is read against the right-hand axis.


Lithium niobate crystal orientations previously used for XBARs include Z-cut and rotated Y-cut. Z-cut has Euler angles=(0°, 0°, 90°). Rotated Y-cut has Euler angles=(0°, β, 0°), with β between 30 and 38 degrees. Z-cut lithium niobate has a TCV of about −102 ppm/° ° C. and e15 of about 3.7. Rotated Y-cut lithium niobate has e15 about 4.4 and TCV between about −86 ppm/° C. and −92 ppm/° C.


Inspection of FIG. 4 shows that rotated Y-cut lithium niobate with β about 67 degrees (broken line 432) has a value of e15 of about 3.7 (broken line 434) which is equivalent to the e15 for Z-cut lithium niobate. Rotated Y-cut lithium niobate with β about 67 degrees has a TCV of about −73 ppm/° C., which is 30% smaller (in magnitude) than the TCV of Z-cut lithium niobate. Filters comprised of XBARs using lithium niobate piezoelectric plates with β substantially equal to 67° may have performance comparable to filters using Z-cut lithium niobate with significantly less frequency dependence on temperature. In this and similar contexts, “substantially equal” means equal with defined manufacturing tolerances. The range from β=38° to β=67° offers a continuous trade-off between piezoelectric coupling and TCV. For example, a rotated Y-cut lithium niobate plate with β=60° offers 5% higher piezoelectric coupling than a plate with β=67° with only a small increase in the magnitude of TCV.


The bandwidth and other requirements of a particular filter may dictate a minimum value for e15. The Euler angles (0°, β, 0°) of the piezoelectric plate may be selected with β set to the highest value in the range from 40° to 67° that provides the required minimum value of e15, while minimizing, to the extent possible, the TCF of the filter.



FIG. 5 is a chart 500 of the performance of a bandpass filter implemented with XBARs formed on a lithium niobate piezoelectric plate with Euler angles (0°, 67°, 0°). Specifically, the solid line 510 is a plot of S21, the input-output transfer function, of the filter at a temperature of 25 degrees Celsius. The dashed line 520 is a plot of S21 at a temperature of 75 degrees Celsius. Both plots are results of simulations of the filter using a finite element method. The temperature coefficient of frequency (TCF) for the upper and lower band edges is about −59 ppm/° C. These TCF values are an improvement (i.e. reduction in magnitude) of 8% to 17% for the lower band edge and 13% to 24% for the upper band edge compared to prior filter designs using Z-cut lithium niobate.



FIG. 6 is a chart 600 of possible combinations of piezoelectric coupling coefficient e15 and temperature coefficient of velocity TCV for all possible orientations of a lithium tantalate crystal. The shaded area 610 contains the values of e15 and TCV for all possible combinations of angles α, β, and γ. The dashed line 620 is the locus of (e15, TCV) values for lithium tantalate piezoelectric plates with Euler angles (0°, β, 0°) where 0≤β≤180°. FIG. 6 shows the maximum piezoelectric coupling coefficient for lithium tantalate is lower than the maximum for lithium niobate. However, lithium tantalate has a wider range of TCV values than lithium niobate. In particular, the TCV of a lithium tantalate piezoelectric plate can be selected within a wide range by selecting an appropriate value for the second Euler angle β.



FIG. 7 is a chart 700 of piezoelectric coupling coefficient e15 and temperature coefficient of velocity TCV as functions of Euler angle β for lithium tantalate with Euler angles (0°, β, 0°). Specifically, the solid curve 710 is a plot of TCV versus β. The solid curve 710 is read against the left-hand axis. TCV is expressed in part per million per degree Celsius (ppm/° C.). The dashed curve 720 is a plot of e15 versus temperature. The dashed curve 720 is read against the right-hand axis.


Inspection of FIG. 7 shows that rotated Y-cut lithium tantalate with Euler angles (0°, β, 0°) has a small positive TCV and e15 greater than 3.0 for β between about 18° and 54°. For comparison, Z-cut lithium tantalate has TCV equal to −20 ppm/° C. and e15 equal to about 2.65. Both TCV and e15 are maximized for β between about 30° and 40°. Lithium tantalate XBARs with β greater than or equal to 30° and less than or equal to 40° can be used for moderate bandwidth filters with low temperature dependence.


Closing Comments


Throughout this description, the embodiments and examples shown should be considered as exemplars, rather than limitations on the apparatus and procedures disclosed or claimed. Although many of the examples presented herein involve specific combinations of method acts or system elements, it should be understood that those acts and those elements may be combined in other ways to accomplish the same objectives. With regard to flowcharts, additional and fewer steps may be taken, and the steps as shown may be combined or further refined to achieve the methods described herein. Acts, elements and features discussed only in connection with one embodiment are not intended to be excluded from a similar role in other embodiments.


As used herein, “plurality” means two or more. As used herein, a “set” of items may include one or more of such items. As used herein, whether in the written description or the claims, the terms “comprising”, “including”, “carrying”, “having”, “containing”, “involving”, and the like are to be understood to be open-ended, i.e., to mean including but not limited to. Only the transitional phrases “consisting of” and “consisting essentially of”, respectively, are closed or semi-closed transitional phrases with respect to claims. Use of ordinal terms such as “first”, “second”, “third”, etc., in the claims to modify a claim element does not by itself connote any priority, precedence, or order of one claim element over another or the temporal order in which acts of a method are performed, but are used merely as labels to distinguish one claim element having a certain name from another element having a same name (but for use of the ordinal term) to distinguish the claim elements. As used herein, “and/or” means that the listed items are alternatives, but the alternatives also include any combination of the listed items.

Claims
  • 1. An acoustic resonator device comprising: a substrate;a lithium niobate plate having front and back surfaces, the back surface facing the substrate, a portion of the lithium niobate plate forming a diaphragm over a cavity of the acoustic resonator device; andan interdigital transducer (IDT) at the lithium niobate plate such that interleaved fingers of the IDT are on the diaphragm,wherein Euler angles of the lithium niobate plate are [0°, β, 0° ], where β is greater than or equal to 40° and less than or equal to 70°, and β is configured to set a piezoelectric coupling coefficient e15 to at least a predetermined value, andwherein the back surface of the lithium niobate plate is bonded to the substrate via an intermediate layer.
  • 2. The acoustic resonator device of claim 1, wherein β is substantially equal to 60°.
  • 3. The acoustic resonator device of claim 1, wherein β is the highest value in a range of between 40° and 67° that provides a required minimum value of the piezoelectric coupling coefficient e15, while minimizing a TCF of the filter.
  • 4. The acoustic resonator device of claim 1, wherein the lithium niobate plate and the IDT are configured such that a radio frequency signal applied to the IDT excites a primary shear acoustic mode in the diaphragms.
  • 5. A filter device, comprising: a plurality of acoustic resonators, with at least one of the acoustic resonators comprising: a substrate;a lithium niobate plate having front and back surfaces, the back surface facing the substrate, the lithium niobate plate include a portion that forms a diaphragm over a cavity of the acoustic resonator; anda conductor pattern at the lithium niobate plate and comprising an interdigital transducer (IDT) having interleaved fingers on the respective diaphragm,wherein Euler angles of the lithium niobate plate of the at least one acoustic resonator are 0°, β, 0°, where β is greater than or equal to 40° and less than or equal to 70°, and β is configured to set a piezoelectric coupling coefficient e15 to at least a predetermined value, andwherein the back surface of the lithium niobate plate of the at least one acoustic resonator is bonded to the substrate via an intermediate layer.
  • 6. The filter device of claim 5, wherein the lithium tantalate plate and the respective IDTs of all of the plurality of acoustic resonators are configured such that respective radio frequency signals applied to each of the IDTs excite respective primary shear acoustic modes in the respective diaphragms.
  • 7. The filter device of claim 5, wherein β is substantially equal to 60°.
  • 8. The filter device of claim 5, wherein β is a highest value in a range of between 40° and 67° that provides a required minimum value of the piezoelectric coupling coefficient e15, while minimizing a TCF of the filter.
  • 9. The filter device of claim 5, wherein the predetermined value is a minimum value of the piezoelectric coupling coefficient e15 that satisfies a set of requirements on the filter device.
  • 10. The filter device of claim 5, wherein the IDT of each of the plurality of acoustic resonators is on a respective diaphragm spanning a respective cavity.
  • 11. The filter device of claim 5, wherein the plurality of acoustic resonators is connected in a ladder filter circuit including one or more shunt resonators and one or more series resonators.
  • 12. The filter device of claim 11, further comprising a frequency-setting dielectric layer on one of the front surface and the back surface of the respective diaphragms of the one or more shunt resonators.
  • 13. A filter device, comprising: a plurality of acoustic resonators, with at least one of the acoustic resonators comprising: a substrate;a lithium tantalate plate having front and back surfaces, the back surface facing the substrate, the lithium tantalate plate include a portion that forms a diaphragm over a cavity of the acoustic resonator; anda conductor pattern at the tantalate niobate plate and comprising an interdigital transducer (IDT) having interleaved fingers on the respective diaphragm,wherein the lithium tantalate plate and the respective IDTs of all of the plurality of acoustic resonators are configured such that respective radio frequency signals applied to each of the IDTs excite respective primary shear acoustic modes in the respective diaphragms,wherein Euler angles of the lithium tantalate plate are 0°, β, 0°, where β is greater than or equal to 18° and less than or equal to 54°, andwherein, for each of the plurality of acoustic resonators, the back surface of the lithium tantalate plate is bonded to the substrate via an intermediate layer.
  • 14. The filter device of claim 13, wherein the plurality of acoustic resonators is connected in a ladder filter circuit including one or more shunt resonators and one or more series resonators.
  • 15. The filter device of claim 14, further comprising a frequency-setting dielectric layer on one of the front surface and the back surface of the respective diaphragms of the one or more shunt resonators.
  • 16. The filter device of claim 13, wherein β is configured to set a piezoelectric coupling coefficient e15 to at least a predetermined value.
  • 17. The filter device of claim 13, wherein each of the IDT of each of the plurality of acoustic resonators is on a respective diaphragm spanning a respective cavity.
RELATED APPLICATION INFORMATION

This patent is a continuation of application Ser. No. 17/460,133, filed Aug. 27, 2021, entitled ACOUSTIC RESONATORS AND FILTERS WITH REDUCED TEMPERATURE COEFFICIENT OF FREQUENCY, which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 17/122,977, filed Dec. 15, 2020, entitled ACOUSTIC RESONATORS AND FILTERS WITH REDUCED TEMPERATURE COEFFICIENT OF FREQUENCY, which claims priority to provisional patent application 63/053,584, filed Jul. 18, 2020, entitled TCF OPTIMIZED XBAR DEVICES, and provisional patent application 63/088,344, filed Oct. 6, 2020, entitled OPTIMAL CUT ANGLE TO REDUCE TCF OF XBAR FILTERS. All of these applications are incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (241)
Number Name Date Kind
5204575 Kanda et al. Apr 1993 A
5274345 Gau Dec 1993 A
5446330 Eda et al. Aug 1995 A
5552655 Stokes et al. Sep 1996 A
5631515 Mineyoshi et al. May 1997 A
5726610 Allen et al. Mar 1998 A
5729186 Seki et al. Mar 1998 A
5853601 Krishaswamy Dec 1998 A
6172582 Hickernell Jan 2001 B1
6271617 Yoneda et al. Aug 2001 B1
6377140 Ehara et al. Apr 2002 B1
6516503 Ikada et al. Feb 2003 B1
6540827 Levy et al. Apr 2003 B1
6570470 Maehara et al. May 2003 B2
6670866 Ella et al. Dec 2003 B2
6707229 Martin Mar 2004 B1
6710514 Ikada et al. Mar 2004 B2
6833774 Abbott et al. Dec 2004 B2
7009468 Kadota et al. Mar 2006 B2
7345400 Nakao et al. Mar 2008 B2
7463118 Jacobsen Dec 2008 B2
7535152 Ogami et al. May 2009 B2
7554427 Matsumoto Jun 2009 B2
7684109 Godshalk et al. Mar 2010 B2
7728483 Tanaka Jun 2010 B2
7868519 Umeda Jan 2011 B2
7939987 Solal et al. May 2011 B1
7941103 Iwamoto et al. May 2011 B2
7965015 Tai et al. Jun 2011 B2
8278802 Lee et al. Oct 2012 B1
8294330 Abbott et al. Oct 2012 B1
8344815 Yamanaka et al. Jan 2013 B2
8816567 Zuo et al. Aug 2014 B2
8829766 Milyutin et al. Sep 2014 B2
8932686 Hayakawa et al. Jan 2015 B2
9093979 Wang Jul 2015 B2
9112134 Takahashi Aug 2015 B2
9130145 Martin et al. Sep 2015 B2
9148121 Inoue Sep 2015 B2
9154111 Bradley Oct 2015 B2
9219466 Meltaus et al. Dec 2015 B2
9240768 Nishihara et al. Jan 2016 B2
9276557 Nordquist et al. Mar 2016 B1
9369105 Li et al. Jun 2016 B1
9425765 Rinaldi Aug 2016 B2
9525398 Olsson Dec 2016 B1
9640750 Nakanishi et al. May 2017 B2
9748923 Kando et al. Aug 2017 B2
9762202 Thalmayr et al. Sep 2017 B2
9780759 Kimura et al. Oct 2017 B2
9837984 Khlat et al. Dec 2017 B2
10079414 Guyette et al. Sep 2018 B2
10187039 Komatsu et al. Jan 2019 B2
10200013 Bower et al. Feb 2019 B2
10211806 Bhattacharjee Feb 2019 B2
10284176 Solal May 2019 B1
10389391 Ito Aug 2019 B2
10491192 Plesski Nov 2019 B1
10601392 Plesski et al. Mar 2020 B2
10637438 Garcia et al. Apr 2020 B2
10644674 Takamine May 2020 B2
10756697 Plesski et al. Aug 2020 B2
10790802 Yantchev et al. Sep 2020 B2
10797675 Plesski Oct 2020 B2
10812048 Nosaka Oct 2020 B2
10819309 Turner et al. Oct 2020 B1
10819319 Hyde Oct 2020 B1
10826462 Plesski et al. Nov 2020 B2
10868510 Yantchev et al. Dec 2020 B2
10868512 Garcia et al. Dec 2020 B2
10868513 Yantchev Dec 2020 B2
10911017 Plesski Feb 2021 B2
10911021 Turner et al. Feb 2021 B2
10911023 Turner Feb 2021 B2
10917070 Plesski et al. Feb 2021 B2
10917072 McHugh et al. Feb 2021 B2
10985726 Plesski Apr 2021 B2
10985728 Plesski et al. Apr 2021 B2
10985730 Garcia Apr 2021 B2
10992282 Plesski et al. Apr 2021 B1
10992283 Plesski et al. Apr 2021 B2
10992284 Yantchev Apr 2021 B2
10998877 Turner et al. May 2021 B2
10998882 Yantchev et al. May 2021 B2
11003971 Plesski et al. May 2021 B2
11114996 Plesski et al. Sep 2021 B2
11114998 Garcia et al. Sep 2021 B2
11139794 Plesski et al. Oct 2021 B2
11143561 Plesski Oct 2021 B2
11146231 Plesski Oct 2021 B2
11146232 Yandrapalli et al. Oct 2021 B2
11146238 Hammond et al. Oct 2021 B2
11146244 Yantchev Oct 2021 B2
11165407 Yantchev Nov 2021 B2
11171629 Turner Nov 2021 B2
11201601 Yantchev et al. Dec 2021 B2
11323089 Turner May 2022 B2
11368139 Garcia Jun 2022 B2
20020079986 Ruby et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020130736 Mukai Sep 2002 A1
20020158714 Kaitila et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020189062 Lin et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030042998 Edmonson Mar 2003 A1
20030080831 Naumenko et al. May 2003 A1
20030199105 Kub et al. Oct 2003 A1
20040041496 Imai et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040100164 Murata May 2004 A1
20040207033 Koshido Oct 2004 A1
20040207485 Kawachi et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040261250 Kadota et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050077982 Funasaka Apr 2005 A1
20050099091 Mishima May 2005 A1
20050185026 Noguchi et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050218488 Matsuo Oct 2005 A1
20050264136 Tsutsumi et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060131731 Sato Jun 2006 A1
20060152107 Tanaka Jul 2006 A1
20060179642 Kawamura Aug 2006 A1
20070090898 Kando et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070115079 Kubo et al. May 2007 A1
20070182510 Park Aug 2007 A1
20070188047 Tanaka Aug 2007 A1
20070194863 Shibata et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070267942 Matsumoto et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070278898 Miura et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070296304 Fujii et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080018414 Inoue et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080246559 Ayazi Oct 2008 A1
20080297280 Thalhammer Dec 2008 A1
20090273415 Frank Nov 2009 A1
20090315640 Umeda Dec 2009 A1
20100019866 Hara et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100064492 Tanaka Mar 2010 A1
20100123367 Tai et al. May 2010 A1
20100223999 Onoe Sep 2010 A1
20100301703 Chen et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110018389 Fukano et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110018654 Bradley et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110102107 Onzuka May 2011 A1
20110109196 Goto et al. May 2011 A1
20110278993 Iwamoto Nov 2011 A1
20120073390 Zaghloul et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120198672 Ueda et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120286900 Kadota et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120326809 Tsuda Dec 2012 A1
20130057360 Meltaus et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130127551 Yamanaka May 2013 A1
20130207747 Nishii et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130234805 Takahashi Sep 2013 A1
20130271238 Onda Oct 2013 A1
20130278609 Stephanou et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130321100 Wang Dec 2013 A1
20140009032 Takahashi et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140009247 Moriya Jan 2014 A1
20140113571 Fujiwara et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140130319 Iwamoto May 2014 A1
20140145556 Kadota May 2014 A1
20140151151 Reinhardt Jun 2014 A1
20140152145 Kando et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140173862 Kando et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140225684 Kando et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140312994 Meltaus et al. Oct 2014 A1
20150014795 Franosch Jan 2015 A1
20150042417 Onodera et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150165479 Lasiter et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150244149 Van Someren Aug 2015 A1
20150319537 Perois et al. Nov 2015 A1
20150333730 Meltaus et al. Nov 2015 A1
20150365067 Hori et al. Dec 2015 A1
20160028367 Shealy Jan 2016 A1
20160049920 Kishino Feb 2016 A1
20160079958 Burak Mar 2016 A1
20160087187 Burak Mar 2016 A1
20160182009 Bhattacharjee Jun 2016 A1
20160285430 Kikuchi et al. Sep 2016 A1
20160301382 Iwamoto Oct 2016 A1
20170104470 Koelle et al. Feb 2017 A1
20170063332 Gilbert et al. Mar 2017 A1
20170179225 Kishimoto Jun 2017 A1
20170179928 Raihn et al. Jun 2017 A1
20170187352 Omura Jun 2017 A1
20170201232 Nakamura et al. Jul 2017 A1
20170214381 Bhattacharjee Jul 2017 A1
20170214387 Burak et al. Jul 2017 A1
20170222617 Mizoguchi Aug 2017 A1
20170222622 Solal et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170264266 Kishimoto Sep 2017 A1
20170290160 Takano et al. Oct 2017 A1
20170370791 Nakamura et al. Dec 2017 A1
20180005950 Watanabe Jan 2018 A1
20180013400 Ito et al. Jan 2018 A1
20180013405 Takata Jan 2018 A1
20180026603 Iwamoto Jan 2018 A1
20180033952 Yamamoto Feb 2018 A1
20180041191 Park Feb 2018 A1
20180062615 Kato et al. Mar 2018 A1
20180062617 Yun et al. Mar 2018 A1
20180123016 Gong May 2018 A1
20180191322 Chang et al. Jul 2018 A1
20180212589 Meltaus et al. Jul 2018 A1
20180278227 Hurwitz Sep 2018 A1
20180309426 Guenard Oct 2018 A1
20190007022 Goto et al. Jan 2019 A1
20190068155 Kimura Feb 2019 A1
20190068164 Houlden et al. Feb 2019 A1
20190123721 Takamine Apr 2019 A1
20190131953 Gong May 2019 A1
20190148621 Feldman et al. May 2019 A1
20190181825 Schmalzl et al. Jun 2019 A1
20190181833 Nosaka Jun 2019 A1
20190207583 Miura et al. Jul 2019 A1
20190245518 Ito Aug 2019 A1
20190273480 Lin et al. Sep 2019 A1
20190305746 Ota Oct 2019 A1
20190348966 Campanella-Pineda Nov 2019 A1
20190379351 Miyamoto et al. Dec 2019 A1
20190386633 Plesski Dec 2019 A1
20190386635 Plesski et al. Dec 2019 A1
20190386636 Plesski et al. Dec 2019 A1
20190386638 Kimura et al. Dec 2019 A1
20200007110 Konaka et al. Jan 2020 A1
20200021271 Plesski Jan 2020 A1
20200021272 Segovia Fernandez et al. Jan 2020 A1
20200036357 Mimura Jan 2020 A1
20200228087 Michigami et al. Jul 2020 A1
20200235719 Yantchev et al. Jul 2020 A1
20200244247 Maeda Jul 2020 A1
20200259480 Pensala Aug 2020 A1
20200274520 Shin Aug 2020 A1
20200295729 Yantchev Sep 2020 A1
20200304091 Yantchev Sep 2020 A1
20200313645 Caron Oct 2020 A1
20200350891 Turner Nov 2020 A1
20210013859 Turner et al. Jan 2021 A1
20210265978 Plesski et al. Aug 2021 A1
20210273631 Jachowski et al. Sep 2021 A1
20210328574 Garcia Oct 2021 A1
20210351762 Dyer et al. Nov 2021 A1
20220103160 Jachowski et al. Mar 2022 A1
20220149808 Dyer et al. May 2022 A1
20220200567 Garcia Jun 2022 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (36)
Number Date Country
106788318 May 2017 CN
110417373 Nov 2019 CN
210431367 Apr 2020 CN
H10209804 Aug 1998 JP
2001244785 Sep 2001 JP
2002300003 Oct 2002 JP
2003078389 Mar 2003 JP
2004096677 Mar 2004 JP
2004129222 Apr 2004 JP
2004304622 Oct 2004 JP
2006173557 Jun 2006 JP
2007251910 Sep 2007 JP
2007329584 Dec 2007 JP
2010062816 Mar 2010 JP
2010103803 May 2010 JP
2010233210 Oct 2010 JP
2013528996 Jul 2013 JP
2013214954 Oct 2013 JP
2015054986 Mar 2015 JP
2016001923 Jan 2016 JP
2018093487 Jun 2018 JP
2018166259 Oct 2018 JP
2018207144 Dec 2018 JP
2020113939 Jul 2020 JP
2010047114 Apr 2010 WO
2015098694 Jul 2015 WO
2016017104 Feb 2016 WO
2016052129 Jul 2016 WO
2016147687 Sep 2016 WO
2017188342 Nov 2017 WO
2018003268 Jan 2018 WO
2018003273 Jan 2018 WO
2018163860 Sep 2018 WO
2019138810 Jul 2019 WO
2020092414 May 2020 WO
2020100744 May 2020 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (5)
Entry
International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2022/081068, mailed Apr. 18, 2023, 17 pages.
Office Action in JP2021175220, mailed Apr. 25, 2023, 10 pages.
Gorisse et al., “Lateral Field Excitation of membrane-based Aluminum Nitride resonators,” Joint Conference of the IEEE International Frequency Control and the European Frequency and Time Forum (FCS), May 2011, 5 pages.
Pang et al., “Self-Aligned Lateral Field Excitation Film Acoustic Resonator with Very Large Electromechanical Coupling,” IEEE International Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control Joint 50th Anniversary Conference, Aug. 2004, pp. 558-561.
Yandrapalli et al., “Toward Band n78 Shear Bulk Acoustic Resonators Using Crystalline Y-Cut Lithium Niobate Films With Spurious Suppression,” Journal of Microelectromechanical System, Aug. 2023, vol. 32, No. 4, pp. 327-334.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20220200569 A1 Jun 2022 US
Provisional Applications (2)
Number Date Country
63088344 Oct 2020 US
63053584 Jul 2020 US
Continuations (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 17460133 Aug 2021 US
Child 17692089 US
Parent 17122977 Dec 2020 US
Child 17460133 US