The present disclosure is generally related to acoustic signal material detection, and more particularly is related to acoustic signal material identification with nanotube couplant.
Pipes and pipelines are commonly used in a variety of industries to transport fluids. For instance, water pipes transport potable and sewer water in urban areas, pipes are used to transport chemicals within factories, and pipelines are used within the oil and gas industry for transporting petroleum products within refineries or between various locations. Similarly, various containers and vessels are often used to store fluids, such as oil storage tanks, chemical storage vessels, and the like. To determine the type of fluid within the vessel, container, pipes, or pipelines, acoustic-based sensors can be used to determine characteristics of the fluid which can be used to then identify the material type or material identity of the fluid.
Acoustic signals are commonly used for determining material identity of fluids, or otherwise assessing fluids and other materials within containers and pipelines, including those used to store oil and gas within the petroleum industry. There are many reasons to use acoustic waves for measurements of fluids or materials in a container or other type of enclosure. For instance, some containers are not easily accessible, such as underground storage tanks and large, multi-story fuel storage containers. Acoustic waves for measurements are also especially useful for metal enclosures and other non-transparent enclosures that encapsulate potentially hazardous materials, such as oil, gas, fuel, and various chemicals at different temperatures. These may be prevalent in processing plants, chemical plants, food industry plants, nuclear power stations, power grid transformers, and refineries.
However, despite the ability to use acoustic signals for determining material identity and otherwise assessing fluids and materials, such an approach is often complicated by faulty or subpart acoustic signal transmissions. In many cases, the acoustic signal transmission may be weakened or altered based on the surrounding environment or the materials within the acoustic signal transmission path. When acoustic signal transmissions are faulty or inaccurate, they lead to inaccurate readings which provide inaccurate results.
Thus, a heretofore unaddressed need exists in the industry to address the aforementioned deficiencies and inadequacies.
Embodiments of the present disclosure provide a system for improved, non-intrusive material identification. Briefly described, in architecture, one embodiment of the system, among others, can be implemented as follows. A vessel is holding or transporting at least one quantity of a fluid. At least one acoustic transducer is positioned on an exterior surface of a sidewall of the vessel. At least one coupling layer is positioned between the at least one acoustic transducer and the exterior surface of the sidewall of the vessel, wherein the at least one coupling layer is formed, at least in part, from nanotubes, wherein the nanotubes improve a reflection of an acoustic signal emitted from the at least one acoustic transducer. A computerized device is in communication with the at least one acoustic signal, the computerized device having a processor and a memory, wherein the computerized device determines a material identification of the quantity of fluid based on, at least in part, the reflection of the ultrasonic signal.
The present disclosure can also be viewed as providing methods for improved, non-intrusive material identification. In this regard, one embodiment of such a method, among others, can be broadly summarized by the following steps: holding or transporting at least one quantity of a fluid in a vessel; positioning at least one acoustic transducer on an exterior surface of a sidewall of the vessel; positioning at least one coupling layer between the at least one acoustic transducer and the exterior surface of the sidewall of the vessel, wherein the at least one coupling layer is formed, at least in part, from nanotubes, wherein the nanotubes improve a reflection of an acoustic signal emitted from the at least one acoustic transducer; and using a computerized device in communication with the at least one acoustic signal, the computerized device having a processor and a memory, determining a material identification of the quantity of fluid based on, at least in part, the reflection of the ultrasonic signal.
Other systems, methods, features, and advantages of the present disclosure will be or become apparent to one with skill in the art upon examination of the following drawings and detailed description. It is intended that all such additional systems, methods, features, and advantages be included within this description, be within the scope of the present disclosure, and be protected by the accompanying claims.
Many aspects of the disclosure can be better understood with reference to the following drawings. The components in the drawings are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead being placed upon clearly illustrating the principles of the present disclosure. Moreover, in the drawings, like reference numerals designate corresponding parts throughout the several views.
In the current era of nanotechnology, a variety of nanotube constituents are available which can be formed into nanoscopic fibers, for instance: carbon nanotubes or nanotubes created from other material or their composites. Advances in nanotechnology have provided acoustic researchers with a number of new materials with nanofibers and nano-pores that can potentially be used in transducer design and as coupling layers. Multiple composite materials were created to explore the capabilities on nanotubes which are waiting for utilization in various industries.
The extraordinary thermal and elastic properties of graphene have attracted great attention in its fundamental research and practical applications. Most of the physical properties of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) derive from graphene. In graphene, carbon atoms are densely organized in a regular bonded atomic-scale honeycomb (hexagonal) pattern, and this pattern is a basic structure for other carbon bonded materials (allotropes) such as fullerenes and carbon nanotubes. Carbon nanotube is a cylinder fabricated of rolled up grapheme sheet. Nanotubes can be single-walled carbon (and/or other materials) nanotubes (SWCNTs) and multiwalled carbon (and/or other materials) nanotubes (MWCNTs). Multi-walled nanotubes are multiple concentric nanotubes precisely nested within one another, which can be aligned in one direction and implemented as an array. The MWCNTs are just connected with Van der Waals forces, and no binder material is needed.
The CNT's have high anisotropic transport properties, including electrical conductivity and thermal conductivity. CNT hexagon two-dimensional structure shows high level of crystal quality. MWCNT show in addition striking telescoping property whereby an inner nanotube core may slide, almost without friction, within its outer nanotube shell, thus creating an atomically perfect linear or rotational motion that shows nearly no friction.
Chemical reactivity is a huge impetus for material identification applications where chemical substances undergo chemical reactions and this is usually coupled with an overall release of significant energy leading to extreme temperatures in the reactor itself or the walls of the container encapsulating the reactor. This may allow for material identification applications in harsh environments. The CNT specific strength is several orders of magnitude higher than steel as versus the stainless steel 63.1 kN·m·kg−1 or high-carbon steel 154 kN·m·kg−1. Temperatures that CNT's can withstand are until 2500 F and 1000 F, although in vacuum their resistance is close to the theoretical 4000 F. The CNT's can transmit a wide range of frequencies without significant absorption.
The unique properties of the carbon nanotubes make them ideal material for identification of material properties in multi-layered applications. Both single walled CNTs as well as CNTs with multi-walled structures may be used. MWCNTs are components of acoustic sensor design in the non-destructive material properties analysis and more scenically but not limited to ultrasonic testing. This approach presents implementation of the emerging molecular nanotechnology where precise positioning of atoms is applied to create useful machines and allows for exploration of quantum effects combined with electrical and mechanical dynamic of the nano material in measurements of the target material properties and environmental conditions like density and temperature as one example.
Although a number of applications of CNTs in noise management have been suggested their acoustic properties have not been widely studied. Nano technology enabled ultrasonic transducer and couplant design for material identification applications with wide frequency range and low energy loss that are capable of withstanding substantial heat and virtually no chemical reactivity for applications in harsh environments may be used, but many other applications are envisioned.
CNT/MWCNT arrays will guide the development of an effective acoustic transducers and coupling layers which will make use of various arrangements and compositions of (carbon, non-carbon, or composite) nanotube arrays.
The strength and flexibility of carbon nanotubes make them of potential use in controlling other nanoscale structures, which suggests they will have a significant role in nanotechnology engineering. Carbon can bond in different ways to construct structures with completely different properties. This may enable transducers to bond to materials without an added coupling.
Further efforts to quantify the acoustic characteristics and absorption performance of nanoscopic fibers and acoustic absorption coefficient of vertically aligned carbon nanotube (CNT) arrays will improve the design of coupling layers and transducers.
Typical piezoelectric ultrasonic transducer under free conditions loose significant power when converting electrical energy to mechanical due to the contributions of the mechanical and electric power losses. The losses in a Langevin ultrasonic transducer can be divided into three parts: dielectric loss of piezoelectric, structural damping loss of the transducer's mechanical components, and losses due to the friction of contact surfaces. Estimate dielectric losses of the piezoelectric ceramic can been measured directly. Dielectric power loss is obtained by calculating the electrical energy stored in a piezoelectric and using the loss factors. The structural damping of the mechanical components of the transducer is calculated using the mechanical quality factors of each component. The factors have been measured using the standard modal tests. Structural power losses are obtained by calculating the elastic energy stored in each component and using the mechanical quality factors. Based on the calculations for the transducer with the resonance frequency of 20 kHz, under free conditions, the input power is 532 W, the total structural power loss at the resonance frequency is 221.82 W, the dielectric power loss is W, and the power loss due to friction is 184.18 W. In this example nearly 80% of the energy is lost and in practice the losses can be higher due to using different frequencies in addition to impedance acoustic mismatch. Bulk of the losses in the above example are in the resonating element, therefore any improvement of the material used to generate (or convert from electrical) the mechanical waves will contribute to significant improvement of signal output without using additional input energy.
These losses can be mitigated by the use of multiwalled nanotubes of any type of material where the internal tubes slide nearly without any friction. Kinetic properties of single- and multi-walled nanotubes (like CNT's or MWCNT) or flat two-dimensional sheets (Graphene in the case of pure carbon) of nanomaterials will serve dual purposes of filters to reduce the noise or remove unwanted signals from the receiving transducer and eliminate unwanted signals when reflecting from the outside wall surface. Thus, improving the noise to signal ratio or selecting specific signals to measure. This way it is possible to select the information desired by selecting an appropriate nano technology enabled material and designing the appropriate internal metamaterial architecture with desired properties that will serve also as couplant in addition to transducer. They will be either implemented as a simple solution or in part of multilayered coupling or multipart transducer solution.
One part of any couplant or transducer design which may be important is the impedance of the material that is being investigated, such as, for example, the impedance of the outside layer of a container. When a multi-layered material is investigated, the maximum signal energy in a specific layer may depend on the losses in the surrounding layers. Therefore, it may be prudent to consider the system of material in its entirety to resolve the issue of signal strength.
Couplant layers can be assembled from nanomaterials in many forms like multi-layered graphene sheets of other two-dimensional single layer atomic sheets of mixed types of atoms and molecules that produce the correct impedance, adhesiveness and material mechanical properties needed for the couplant is a specific application. Additionally, nano tubes, nano spheres from different materials or mixtures can be used to create need impedance and mechanical response.
Multiple layers of materials may often perform better than a signal layer where the ideal material interface for one couplant layer or multiple layers can be calculated. In the case of multiple layers, it may be possible to perfect for all the layers at the same time. This optimization may start from the top layer and continue down to the last layer, as the perfect match for both layers is calculated in each step. It may be possible to change the number of layers, and the size of the step in terms of impedance may change during the optimization algorithm in the method described herein.
The layer(s) in the couplant can be mixture from nano components an any other materials including gels including but not limited to some of the existing couplants on the market.
The multiple layers may or may not be only from nano-materials or materials enhanced with nano materials in any form, i.e., randomly distributed through the host material of oriented in some fashion.
The subject disclosure is directed to the nanotube enabled systems and methods for improved transducer and couplant performance in ultrasonic applications for material identity detection and other material characteristic assessment.
The fluid 22 within the vessel 20 may include any type of fluid, such as, for instance, oil, gas, fuel, a chemical, water, a composition of materials, or any other type of material or mix of materials. In this disclosure, oil and gas are used as exemplary fluids 22 to provide clarity in disclosure.
At least one acoustic transducer 30 is positioned on an exterior surface 28 of the sidewall 24 of the vessel 20. The acoustic transducer 30 may be an acoustic or ultrasonic sensing device which is capable of emitting one or more acoustic or ultrasonic signals 32, e.g., an ultrasonic wave with particular characteristics, and may be capable of receiving one or more acoustic or ultrasonic signals 32. As shown in
Acoustic signals 32 are capable of being emitted into a sidewall 24 of a vessel 20 by the acoustic transducer 30, whereby the signals 32, or a portion thereof, move through the sidewall 24 proximate to the mounting location of the acoustic transducer 30, and into the fluid 22 within the vessel 20. All or a portion of the signals 32 may contact the opposing sidewall 24, e.g., distal or opposite from where the acoustic transducer 30 is mounted, where all or a portion of those signals 32 are reflected back to the acoustic transducer. The acoustic transducer 30, or another acoustic transducer 30, may sense the reflected signal.
At least one computerized device 50 may be in communication with the acoustic transducer 30, or any portion of a plurality of acoustic transducers, such that the computerized device 50 can receive the acoustic signal 32 or data derived from the acoustic signals 32. The computerized device 50 may include any computer having a memory 52 and a processor 54 which is capable of executing instructions for performing functions. The computerized device 50 may be in communication with the acoustic transducer 30 through any type of communication network, such as a wired or wireless network, direct or indirect, as well as be in communication with other devices, such as other computers, other networks, the Internet, or other computing architecture. The computerized device 50 may determine the material identity of the fluid 22 within the vessel 20, or otherwise assess or determine a characteristic or property of the fluid 22 or the sidewall 24 of the vessel, based at least in part on the acoustic signal 32.
To improve signal transmission into the sidewall 24 of the vessel 20, at least one coupling layer 40 may be positioned between the at least one acoustic transducer 30 and the exterior surface 28 of the sidewall 24 of the vessel 20. The couplant 40 may be formed, at least in part, from nanotubes, which may include nano particles or similar nano-materials, whereby the nanotube couplant improves reflection of the signal 32 emitted from the at least one acoustic transducer 30. In one example, the nanotube couplant may be formed from a couplant material with the addition of a nanotube materials, and optionally, other materials. The nanotube couplant 40 may help ensure that the system with the acoustic transducer 30 can be used for material identification applications with wide frequency range and less energy loss. Additionally, the nanotube couplant 40 may allow the acoustic transducer 30 to be capable of withstanding substantial heat and low chemical reactivity for applications in harsh environments.
In use, most materials which receive acoustic signals, despite being tactically smooth, are often very uneven on their surfaces, such that there are numerous inequalities, pits, cavities, or textures on the surface. On a micro-level, these inequalities trap air and other materials, which reduce the surface through which signals can be transmitted. The use of the nanotube couplant 40 acts to fill in these inequalities and gaps, such that there is a more homogeneous surface and material through which signals can be sent, which in turn, allows for signals to pass with greater energy. Building single or multiple layer nano particles for a nano layer may allow for the nano particles to coat the uneven parts of each surface so it is possible to use middle layer or layers for effective energy transfer among rigid objects.
The nanotube couplant 40 can be used in various different configurations. For example, as shown in
In
In another example,
Other configurations for using one or more nanotube couplants 40 with one or more acoustic transducers 30 are also contemplated, all of which are considered within the scope of the present disclosure.
Recent advances in nanotechnology have yielded a number of new materials with nanofibers and nano-pores that can be implemented in acoustic applications. Despite isolated measurements of the acoustic absorption properties of nano materials having not been studied widely, it has been discovered that applications of the acoustic properties presented from carbon nanotubes (CNT), or multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNT) arrays may provide benefits with designing effective acoustic transducers and coupling layers which may make use of various arrangements and compositions of nanotube arrays, including carbon, non-carbon or composite. Thus, the use of nanotube couplants 40 in any configuration can provide substantial improvements in preventing signal energy loss, in allowing a wide frequency range of signals to be used, and in withstanding substantial heat and low chemical reactivity for applications in harsh environments, among other benefits.
Using carbon nanotubes as an exemplary material, it is noted that the strength and flexibility of carbon nanotubes make them of potential use in controlling other nanoscale structures, which suggests they will have a significant role in nanotechnology engineering. Most of the physical properties of carbon nanotubes derive from graphene. In graphene, carbon atoms are densely organized in a regular sp2-bonded atomic-scale honeycomb (hexagonal) pattern, and this pattern is a basic structure for other sp2 carbon bonded materials (allotropes) such as fullerenes and carbon nanotubes. Carbon nanotubes are theoretically distinct as a cylinder fabricated of rolled up grapheme sheet. It can be divided into a single well or multiple wells.
Nanotubes with a single well are described as single-wall carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs), while the ones with more than one well are MWCNTs.
As shown in
Both SWCNTs as well as MWCNTs may be used within the nanotube couplant 40 of
In chemistry, reactivity is a huge impetus for material identification applications where chemical substances undergo chemical reactions. This is usually coupled with an overall release of significant energy leading to extreme temperatures in the reactor itself or the walls of the container encapsulating the reactor. For instance, the extraordinary thermal and elastic properties of graphene, mainly originating from its unique acoustic phonon branches near Γ point in Brillouin zone, have attracted great attention in its fundamental research and practical applications. The CNT's have high anisotropic transport properties, including electrical conductivity and thermal conductivity. Crystal quality of CNT has been confirmed by Raman scattering measurement. Intensity ratio of G-peak (1580 cm-1) and D-peak (1350 cm-1) represents quality of graphitization of carbon materials. G/D of CNT is ˜3, showing high crystal quality. The high crystallinity may also be supported by transmission electron microscopy.
With the use of nanotube couplants 40, acoustic signal transmission through walls of vessels 20 or other containment units can be improved, which can increase the accuracy of material type identification in the fluid within the vessel, where the signals 32 are used, at least in part, to make a determination of a material identification of the quantity of fluid using known techniques. It is noted that the nanotube material forming the couplant, in whole or part, may include various characteristics or designs. For instance, it may be possible to apply single or multiwalled nanotubes of any material as a coupling layer between the acoustic transducer 30 and the material which is desired to be analyzed or investigated, such as by applying a layer of carbon nanotubes on the outside of the vessel 20 or pipe to improve reflection of the ultrasound wave in multiple conditions. A standard transducer may be used with one or more nanotube coupling layers to improve existing transducers, thereby allowing existing transducer technology to operate better than it conventionally does. It may also be possible to apply one or more coupling layers, which may allow for future applications, such as a gigahertz mechanical oscillator where there are no losses in the transducer. It is also possible to use vertically aligned nanotube arrays to improve existing mechanical properties of the transducers, including with the speed of sound, impedance, and attenuation.
Tables 1 and 2, below, illustrate supporting data to the improvement of impedance by using nanotubes in couplants relative to various other materials:
Tables 3 and 4 illustrate practical examples of the benefit of the system 10. In particular, Table 3 illustrates traditional transducer using (PZT Ceramic) and couplant (Ultragel II) to interface with steel wall:
This table shows that traditional transducers loose potentially ˜90%+ of the initial signal in the transducer only, and there is evidence that 80% of these losses are centered in the conversion of electric to mechanical energy.
Table 4 illustrates data in an example where a transducer using (PZT Ceramic) and a nano base couplant (CNT) to interface with the wall is used:
Here, the nanotubes material is using “standard” maximum impedance, however it is possible to find appropriate design and material composition to achieve the target impedance for this case of 36.63 and therefore 100% signal transmission. For Tables 3-4, all impedance values are in MRayls units.
In both
It is also noted that a nanotube couplant can be used with
This nanotube oriented array couplant design may provide improved signal transmission and noise range filtering/selection as well as high-temperature applications, low signal losses and wide frequency range of signal transmission enabling for better detection of materials inside the pipe/container. The nano materials can vary widely that would lead to implementation of wide range of impedance for single or multiple layer matching for signal improvement.
In a similar design,
The use of the enhanced nanotube couplant or gel may provide significant benefits in the industry of acoustic signal transmission. Carbon nanotubes or sphere-enhanced couplant can be understood using the average impedance for a class of materials. As such, the only viable way to increase the energy of the signal is to reduce the impedance of the transducer by adding a modified carbon nanotube layer on the faces of the transducer with the desired impedance suitable for each application or class of applications. This is depicted in Tables 5-7:
From Tables 5-7, it can be seen that the transducer impedance needs to be closer to the class of the material that has been identified. Thus, for air, it needs to be in the range of 600-800 Rayls, whereas for polymers, between 6-8 Mrayls, and for metals, approximately around 50 Mraysl.
In some situations, a pipe formed with a polymer pipe wall, such as polyethylene (PE) can lead to a 50% signal increase, as shown in Table 8:
Exponentially reducing layers may help increase the energy that will cross into the material. It is noted that the optimization may advantageously be done top down, layer by layer. When the top layer impedance produces a maximum transmission, then it may be possible to move to the bottom layer.
Exemplary values of the polymer pipe wall example for Polyethylene (PE) are depicted in Table 9:
Better impedance may be achieved for layers adjusted for specific classes of pipe/container materials, such as, for instance, thermoplastic pipes. In particular, Tables 10-12 show the performance of using Ultragel II couplant for each pipe wall. Pipes formed from PEX and also PE-RT can be combined with a thin aluminum middle layer to alter performance. In this situation, the aluminum may serve two purposes: as an oxygen barrier and to increase the longitudinal stiffness of the pipe. Details of this alteration are shown in Tables 10-12:
Tables 13-18, below, illustrate using specific material adapted couplant rather that material class adapted couplant leads only to marginal improvement in signal energy.
Together, these tables show that it is more practical to select one couplant design for class of pipes/containers. For instance, thermoplastic pipe class couplant performs reasonably well that the one optimized for each plastic, and it has been found that 3-5 layers are optimal due to diminishing return of the performance curve, as indicated in
It should be emphasized that the above-described embodiments of the present disclosure, particularly, any “preferred” embodiments, are merely possible examples of implementations, merely set forth for a clear understanding of the principles of the disclosure. Many variations and modifications may be made to the above-described embodiment(s) of the disclosure without departing substantially from the spirit and principles of the disclosure. All such modifications and variations are intended to be included herein within the scope of this disclosure and the present disclosure and protected by the following claims.
This application claims benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 63/368,856 entitled, “Acoustic Signal Material Identification with Nanotube Couplant” filed Jul. 19, 2022, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2449054 | Chantlin | Sep 1948 | A |
3019650 | Worswick | Feb 1962 | A |
3703829 | Dougherty | Nov 1972 | A |
3837218 | Flambard et al. | Sep 1974 | A |
3971962 | Green | Jul 1976 | A |
4065958 | Krylova et al. | Jan 1978 | A |
4118983 | Braznikov | Oct 1978 | A |
4121468 | Glover et al. | Oct 1978 | A |
4182177 | Prough | Jan 1980 | A |
4208908 | Hickox | Jun 1980 | A |
4280126 | White | Jul 1981 | A |
4320659 | Lynnworth et al. | Mar 1982 | A |
4326173 | Newman | Apr 1982 | A |
4501146 | Greenhalgh | Feb 1985 | A |
4580448 | Skrgatic | Apr 1986 | A |
4596266 | Kinghorn et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
4599892 | Doshi | Jul 1986 | A |
4676098 | Erlenkämper et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4852416 | Boone et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4934191 | Kroening et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4954997 | Dieulesaint et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4977780 | Machida et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
5015995 | Holroyd | May 1991 | A |
5038611 | Weldon et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5040415 | Barkhoudarian | Aug 1991 | A |
5148700 | King | Sep 1992 | A |
5195058 | Simon | Mar 1993 | A |
5223822 | Stommes et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5295120 | McShane | Mar 1994 | A |
5325727 | Miller et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5415033 | Maresca, Jr. et al. | May 1995 | A |
5438868 | Holden et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5453944 | Baumoel | Sep 1995 | A |
5460046 | Maltby et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5469749 | Shimada et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5604314 | Grahn | Feb 1997 | A |
5663505 | Nakamura | Sep 1997 | A |
5770806 | Hiismaki | Jun 1998 | A |
5821427 | Byrd | Oct 1998 | A |
5836192 | Getman et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
6035903 | Few et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6105431 | Duffill et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6151956 | Takabashi et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6157894 | Hess et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6192751 | Stein et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6330831 | Lynnworth et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6354147 | Gysling et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6368281 | Solomon et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6443006 | Degrave | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6470744 | Usui et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6481287 | Ashworth et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6513385 | Han | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6575043 | Huang et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6578424 | Ziola et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6631639 | Dam et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6672163 | Han et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6691582 | Nawa et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6836734 | Rojas et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6925868 | Young et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6938488 | Diaz et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7085391 | Yamaya | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7114375 | Panetta et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7246522 | Diaz et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7299136 | DiFoggio et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7330797 | Bailey et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7359803 | Gysling et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7363174 | Kishiro et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7430924 | Gysling et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7437946 | Gysling et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7624650 | Gysling et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7624651 | Fernald et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7656747 | Mandal et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7694570 | Dam et al. | Apr 2010 | B1 |
7757560 | Hofmann | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7962293 | Gysling | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7966882 | Greenwood | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8249829 | Vass et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8346491 | Loose et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8482295 | Sadri et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8683882 | Jackson | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8820182 | Nikolay Nikolov et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8850882 | Qu et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8915145 | Van Orsdol | Dec 2014 | B1 |
9057677 | Field | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9383476 | Trehan et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9557208 | Kuroda et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9772311 | Liljenberg et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9816848 | Raykhman et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9835450 | Deleye et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9891085 | Muhammad et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9903840 | Altpeter et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
10122051 | Kuhne et al. | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10180410 | Takahashi et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10215613 | Kassubek et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10458871 | Norli | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10794871 | Blackshire et al. | Oct 2020 | B1 |
11020793 | De Monte et al. | Jun 2021 | B2 |
11047721 | Schöb et al. | Jun 2021 | B2 |
11274952 | Bober et al. | Mar 2022 | B2 |
11293791 | Firouzi et al. | Apr 2022 | B2 |
11536696 | Bivolarsky | Dec 2022 | B2 |
11585690 | Bivolarsky | Feb 2023 | B2 |
11729537 | Heim et al. | Aug 2023 | B2 |
11788904 | Bivolarsky et al. | Oct 2023 | B2 |
20020170753 | Clare | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020173230 | Mayes | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20040035208 | Diaz et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040079150 | Breed et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040173021 | Lizon et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040226615 | Morikawa et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050055136 | Hofmann et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050102109 | Dubois et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050128873 | LaBry | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050178198 | Freger et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050247070 | Arshansky et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060196224 | Esslinger | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070001028 | Gysling | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070068248 | Freger | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070068253 | Carodiskey | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070157737 | Gysling et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070205907 | Schenk | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080092623 | Lynch et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080101158 | Hosseini et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20090007678 | Fukutomi et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090143681 | Jurvelin et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20100046576 | Desai | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100111133 | Yuhas et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100199779 | Liu et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100218599 | Young et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100242593 | Lagergren et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100307249 | Lesage et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110029262 | Barkhouse | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110048551 | Tanaka et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110072904 | Lam et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110120218 | Aldridge | May 2011 | A1 |
20110239769 | Schmitt et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110271769 | Kippersund et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110284288 | Sawyer et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120024067 | Oberdoerfer et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120055239 | Sinha | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120173169 | Skelding | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120222471 | Raykhman et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120226159 | Sinclair et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120259560 | Woltring et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120262472 | Garr et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120265454 | Rudd et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120281096 | Gellaboina et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130002443 | Breed et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130041597 | Deleye et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130068027 | Sullivan et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130080081 | Dugger et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130090575 | Rupp et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130120155 | Hagg | May 2013 | A1 |
20130128035 | Johns et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130213714 | Fuida | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140020478 | Ao et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140027455 | Castellano et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140076415 | Dunki-Jacobs et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140107435 | Sharf et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140223992 | Harper et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140301902 | Fernald et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140375169 | Na et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150068311 | Tanaka et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150075278 | Dockendorff et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150177045 | Cobianu et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150198471 | Furlong et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150212045 | Raykhman et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150247751 | Kutlik et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150260003 | McHugh et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150276463 | Milne et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150369647 | Kumar et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160025545 | Saltzgiver et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160041024 | Reimer et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160108730 | Fanini et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160109304 | Yan et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160146653 | Skelding | May 2016 | A1 |
20160169839 | Gottlieb et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160216141 | Leaders et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160265954 | Bachmann et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160320226 | Schaefer et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20170002954 | Brown et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170010144 | Lenner et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170010145 | Lenner et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170010146 | Kassubek et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170059389 | Moore et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170082650 | Hies et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170087526 | Luharuka | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170102095 | Kunita et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170097322 | Giese et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170199295 | Mandal | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170202595 | Shelton, IV | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170239741 | Furuta | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170268915 | Gestner et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170295743 | Brown et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170309989 | Waelde et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20180035603 | Kremmer et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180044159 | Crouse et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180080809 | Tokarev et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180113663 | Jain | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180149505 | Ploss et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180266874 | Montoya et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180299317 | Truong et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180306628 | Parrott et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180348169 | Lee et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190011304 | Cunningham et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190063984 | Bowley | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190078927 | Takayama et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190137310 | Xiao et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190154480 | Schöb et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190195629 | Vaissiere | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190195830 | Tamura et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190272496 | Moeller | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190368908 | Aughton et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20200018628 | Head et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200182736 | Kim et al. | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200195449 | Obaidi | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200200711 | Fehran et al. | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200378283 | Zhang et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20200378812 | Heim | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20200378818 | Heim et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20210382014 | Xu et al. | Dec 2021 | A1 |
20220034850 | Zhang et al. | Feb 2022 | A1 |
20220178879 | Bivolarsky et al. | Jun 2022 | A1 |
20220178881 | Bivolarsky et al. | Jun 2022 | A1 |
20220276102 | Bivolarsky et al. | Sep 2022 | A1 |
20230258488 | Coleman | Aug 2023 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
204944617 | Jan 2016 | CN |
105333925 | Feb 2016 | CN |
105548370 | May 2016 | CN |
10 2010 029 254 | Dec 2011 | DE |
0372700 | Jun 1990 | EP |
2450701 | May 2012 | EP |
2962096 | Aug 2019 | EP |
2192717 | Jan 1990 | GB |
H1073385 | Mar 1998 | JP |
2000314651 | Nov 2000 | JP |
2002340654 | Nov 2002 | JP |
2013140029 | Jul 2013 | JP |
200174618 | Mar 2000 | KR |
WO 8704793 | Aug 1987 | WO |
WO 8809895 | Dec 1988 | WO |
WO 9010849 | Sep 1990 | WO |
WO 2007149605 | Dec 2007 | WO |
WO 2008079202 | Jul 2008 | WO |
WO 2009154719 | Dec 2009 | WO |
WO 2014021846 | Feb 2014 | WO |
WO 2014167471 | Oct 2014 | WO |
WO 2020136945 | Jul 2020 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Amjad, Umar et al, “Advanced signal processing technique for damage detection in steel tubes” Proceedings of SPIE, Health Monitoring of Structural and Biological Systems 2016, 980511 (Apr. 1, 2016); 14 pgs. |
Amjad, Umar et al. “Change in time-to-flight of longitudinal (axisymmetric) wave modes due to lamination in steel pipes” Proceedings of SPIE vol. 8695, Health Monitoring of Structural and Biological Systems 2013, 869515 (Apr. 17, 2013); 10 pgs. |
Amjad, Umar et al., “Effects of transducers on guided wave based structural health monitoring” Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 10600, Health Monitoring of Structural and Biological Systems XII, 106000F (Apr. 23, 2018), 10 pgs. |
Amjad, U. et al., “Generalized representations and universal aspects of Lamb wave dispersion relations” Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 7650, Health Monitoring of Structural and Biological Systems 2010, 76502F (Apr. 8, 2010), 9 pgs. |
Amjad, Umar et al., “Detection and quantification of pipe damage from change in time of flight and phase” Ultrasoncis vol. 62 (2015) pp. 223-236, Jun. 11, 2015, 14 pgs. |
Amjad, Umar et al., “Detection and quantification of diameter reduction due to corrosion in reinforcing steel bars” Structural Health Monitoring 2015, vol. 14(5) 532-543, 12 pgs. |
Amjad, Umar et al., “Detection and quantification of delamination in laminated plates from the phase of appropriate guided wave modes” Optical Engineering 55(1), Jan. 2016, 11 pgs. |
API: American Petroleum Institute Preliminary Program, Oct. 16-17, 2019, 5 pages. |
Gurkov, Andrey “Gigantic Druzhba oil pipeline paralyzed for weeks” May 7, 2019, 3 pages, https://www.dw.com/en/gigantic-druzhba-oil-pipeline-paralyzed-for-weeks/a-48638989. |
Hassanzadeh et al., “Investigation of factors affecting on viscosity reduction of sludge from Iranian crude oil storage tanks”, Petroleum Science, vol. 15, Jul. 2018, pp. 634-643. |
Kak et al., “Principles of Computerized Tomographic Imaging”, IEEE, 1988, Chapter 2, 48 pgs. |
Luck, Marissa “Deer Park fire a ‘blemish’ for the petrochemical industry's image” Houston Chronicle, Mar. 26, 2019, 3 pages https://www.houstonchronicle.com/business/energy/article/Deer-Park-fire-a-blemish-for-the-image-of-13717661.php. |
Pandey, “Ultrasonic attenuation in condensed matter”, Dissertation for V.B.S. Purvanchal University, 2009, Chapter 1, 36 pgs. |
Pluta et al., “Stress Dependent Dispersion Relations of Acoustic Waves Travelling on a Chain of Point Masses Connected by Anharmonic Linear and Torsional Springs” International Congress on Ultrasonics AIP Conf. Proc. 1433, 471-474 (2012); 5 pgs. |
Shelke, et al., “Mode-Selective Excitation and Detection of Ultrasonic Guided Waves for Delamination Detection in Laminated Aluminum Plates” IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, vol. 58, No. 3, Mar. 2011, 11 pgs. |
“TOPS Terminal Operating Practices Symposium” Program Agenda, Apr. 11, 2018, 1 page. |
Zadler, et al., “Resonant Ultrasound Spectroscopy: theory and application”, Geophysical Journal International, vol. 156, Issue 1, Jan. 2004, pp. 154-169. |
Vermeersch, “Influence of substrate thickness on thermal impedance of microelectronic structures”, Microelectronics Reliability, 47, 2007, pp. 437-443. |
Alpha Chemistry website, “Carbon nanotube sheet”, https://graphene.alfa- chemistry.com/product/carbon-nanotube-sheet-cas-308068-56-6-330280.html?id=, accessed Oct. 17, 2023, 6 pgs. |
Attiya, “Lower Frequency Limit of Carbon Nanotube Antenna”, Progress in Electromagnetics Research, PIER 94, 2009, pp. 419-433, 16 pgs. |
Ayub et al., “Acoustic absorption behaviour of carbon nanotube arrays”, Inter-Noise 2014, Melbourne Australia, Nov. 16-19, 2014, 10 pgs. |
Calculla.com “Acoustic impedance of various materials table”, https://calculla.com/acoustic_impedance, accessed Oct. 18, 2023, 4 pgs. |
Chico et al., “Pure Carbon Nanoscale Devices: Nanotube Heterojunctions”, Physical Review Letters, vol. 76, No. 6, Feb. 5, 1996, 4 pgs. |
Ciplys, et al., “Attenuation of Surface Acoustic Waves by Carbon Nanotubes”, Materials Research Society, vol. 750, 2003, 6 pgs. |
Cong et al., “Probing the acoustic phonon dispersion and sound velocity of graphene by Raman Spectroscopy”, Carbon 149, 2019, pp. 19-24, 6 pgs. |
Delogu et al., “Functionalized multiwalled carbon nanotubes as ultrasound contrast agents”, PNAS, vol. 109, No. 41, Oct. 9, 2012, 6 pgs. |
Dumitrica, et al., “Strain-rate and temperature dependent plastic yield in carbon nanotubes from ab initio calculations”, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 84, No. 15, Apr. 12, 2004, 3 pgs. |
Eatemadi et al., “Carbon nanotubes: properties, synthesis, purification, and medical applications”, Nanoscale Research Letters, 2014, 13 pgs. |
Engineering Toolbox website, “ASTM D3035—Polyethylene PE pipes—dimensions”, https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/ASTM-D3035-PE-pipes-d_2138.html , accessed Oct. 17, 2023, 9 pgs. |
Garcia-Gancedo et al., “AIN-based BAW resonators with CNT electrodes for gravimetric biosensing”, Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 2011, 8 pgs. |
Huang et al., “Kink Formation and Motion in Carbon Nanotubes at Hight Temperatures”, Physical Review Letters, PRL 97, Aug. 18, 2006, 4 pgs. |
Huang et al., “Superplastic carbon nanotubes”, Nature, vol. 439, Jan. 19, 2006, 1 pg. |
Iborra et al., “Acoustic Properties of Carbon Nanotube Electrodes in BAW Resonators”, IEEE, 2013, pp. 984-987, 4 pgs. |
Iijima et al., “Single-shell carbon nanotubes of 1-nm diameter”, Nature, vol. 363, Jun. 17, 1993, 3 pgs. |
Iijima, “Helical microtubules of graphitic carbon”, Nature, vol. 354, Nov. 7, 1991, 3 pgs. |
Kim et al., “Direct Observation of Localized Defect States in Semiconductor Nanotube Junctions”, Physical Review Letters, vol. 90, No. 21, May 30, 2003, 4 pgs. |
Kozlov et al., “Sound of carbon nanotube assemblies”, J. Appl Phys. 105, 2009, Abstract only, 1 pg. |
Magnin, et al., “Collapse phase diagram of carbon nanotubes with arbitrary number of walls. Collapse modes and macroscopic analog”, Carbon 179, 2021, pp. 552-562, 11 pgs. |
Minary-Jolandan et al., “Reversible radial deformation up to the complete flattening of carbon nanotubes in nanoindentation”, Journal of Applied Physics, 103, 2008, 5 pgs. |
Mori et al., “Energetics of plastic bending of carbon nanotubes”, Physical Review B 74, 2006, 5 pgs. |
Nakayama et al., “Current-Induced Plastic Deformation of Double-Walled Carbon Nanotubes”, Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 44, No. 23, 2005, pp. L720-L722, 4 pgs. |
Nano Werk website, https://www.nanowerk.com/nanotechnology/introduction/introduction_to_nanotechnology_22.php accessed Oct. 17, 2023, 14 pgs. |
Nardelli et al., “Mechanism of strain release in carbon nanotubes”, Physical Review B, vol. 57, No. 8, Feb. 15, 1998, 4 pgs. |
NDTNet website, https://www.ndt.net/links/proper.htm, accessed Oct. 17, 2023, 2 pgs. |
Ouyang et al., “Atomically Resolved Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube Intramolecular Junctions”, Science, vol. 291, No. 5501, Jan. 5, 2021, pp. 97-100, 5 pgs. |
Palaci et al., “Radial elasticity of multi-walled carbon nanotubes”, Physical Review Letters, vol. 94, No. 17, 2005, 5 pgs. |
PVC Pipe Dimensions—Schedule 40, https://www.pvcfittingsonline.com/resource-center/pvc-pipe-dimensions-18-through-24/, accessed Oct. 17, 2023, 2 pgs. |
“Velocity Speed of Sound in Various Materials—RF Cafe”, accessed Oct. 17, 2023, 3 pgs. |
Rudoff et al., “Radial deformation of carbon nanotubes by van der Waals forces”, Nature, vol. 364, Aug. 5, 1993, 3 pgs. |
Sato, “Elastic and Plastic Deformation of Carbon Nanotubes”, Procedia Engineering, 14, 2011, pp. 2366-2372, 7 pgs. |
Shima, et al., “Chapter 6, Topological Defects”, Elastic and Plastic Deformation of Carbon Nanotubes, CRC Press, pp. 81-98, 2013, 18 pgs. |
Signal Processing website, https://www.signal-processing.com/table.php, accessed Oct. 17, 2023, 3 ps. |
Teppfa, “Fast Guide to Materials”, https://www.teppfa.eu/benefits-of-plastic-pipes-and-fittings/fast-guide-to-materials/, accessed Oct. 17, 2023, 2 pgs. |
Wikipedia “Carbon nanotube”, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon nanotube, accessed Oct. 17, 2023, 35 pgs. |
Wikipedia “Mechanism properties of carbon nanotubes”, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mechanical_properties_of_carbon_nanotubes, accessed Oct. 17, 2023, 6 pgs. |
Wikipedia, “Speed of Sound”, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speed_of_sound, accessed Oct. 17, 2023, 19 pgs. |
Yang et al., “Radial elasticity of single-walled carbon nanotube measured by atomic force microscopy”, Applied Physics Letters, 98, 2011, 3 pgs. |
Yoon et al., “Sound wave propagation in multiwall carbon nanotubes”, J. Appl. Phys. 93, 2003, Abstract only, 1 pg. |
Yu, et al., “Strength and Breaking Mechanism of Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes Under Tensile Load”, Science, vol. 287, Jan. 28, 2000, 4 pgs. |
Yu, et al., “Investigation of the Radial Deformability of Individual Carbon Nanotubes under Controlled Indentation Force”, Physical Review Letters, vol. 85, No. 7, Aug. 14, 2000, 4 pgs. |
Zhang et al., “Plastic Deformations of Carbon Nanotubes”, Physical Review Letters, vol. 81, No. 24, Dec. 14, 1998, 4 pgs. |
Zhou et al., “Formation energy of Stone-Wales defects in carbon nanotubes”, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 83, No. 6, Aug. 11, 2003, 3 pgs. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 17/566,020, dated Oct. 23, 2023, 8 pgs. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 18/142,467, dated Dec. 6, 2023, 11 pgs. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 17/542,462, dated Jan. 8, 2024, 11 pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20240027405 A1 | Jan 2024 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
63368856 | Jul 2022 | US |