This patent document relates to systems, devices, and processes for acoustic energy diagnostics and therapies.
Acoustic imaging is an imaging modality that employs the properties of sound waves traveling through a medium to render a visual image. High frequency acoustic imaging has been used as an imaging modality for decades in a variety of biomedical fields to view internal structures and functions of animals and humans. High frequency acoustic waves used in biomedical imaging may operate in different frequencies, e.g., between 1 and 20 MHz, or even higher frequencies, and are often termed ultrasound waves. Some factors, including inadequate spatial resolution and tissue differentiation, can lead to less than desirable image quality using conventional techniques of ultrasound imaging, which can limit its use for many clinical indications or applications.
Techniques, systems, and devices are disclosed for coupling acoustic signal transducers to body structures for transmitting and receiving acoustic signals in ultrasound imaging, range-Doppler measurements, and therapies.
In one aspect, a couplant device of the disclosed technology for transmission of acoustic energy between transducers and a target includes a housing body structured to present an array of transducer elements on a curved section (e.g., curved lip) of the housing body (e.g., such as a semicircular or a circular portion that exposes the transducer elements of the array on a curved surface); and an acoustic coupling component including a hydrogel material (e.g., which may be at least partially contained in an outer lining). The acoustic coupling component is operable to conduct acoustic signals between a transducer element disposed in the housing body and a receiving medium (e.g., skin of a subject) in contact with the acoustic coupling component to propagate the acoustic signal toward a target volume, such that the acoustic coupling component is capable to conform to the target volume such that there is an acoustic impedance matching (e.g., very low attenuation) between the receiving medium and the transducer element.
The subject matter described in this patent document and attached appendices can be implemented in specific ways that provide one or more of the following features. For example, the couplant device can further include a flexible bracket coupled to and capable of moving with respect to the housing body, in which the flexible bracket secures the acoustic coupling component to the device. For example, the target volume includes a biological structure of a subject (e.g., an organ or tissue), and the receiving medium includes skin of the subject. In implementations of the couplant device, for example, the receiving medium can include hair on the exterior of the skin.
Acoustic imaging can be performed by emitting an acoustic waveform (e.g., pulse) within a physical elastic medium, such as a biological medium, including tissue. The acoustic waveform is transmitted from a transducer element (e.g., of an array of transducer elements) toward a target volume of interest (VOI). Propagation of the acoustic waveform in the medium toward the target volume can encounter structures that cause the acoustic waveform to become partly reflected from a boundary between two mediums (e.g., differing biological tissue structures) and partially transmitted. The reflection of the transmitted acoustic waveform can depend on the acoustic impedance difference between the two mediums (e.g., at the interface between two different biological tissue types). For example, some of the acoustic energy of the transmitted acoustic waveform can be scattered back to the transducer at the interface to be received, and processed to extract information, while the remainder may travel on and to the next medium. In some instances, scattering of the reflection may occur as the result of two or more impedances contained in the reflective medium acting as a scattering center. Additionally, for example, the acoustic energy can be refracted, diffracted, delayed, and/or attenuated based on the properties of the medium and/or the nature of the acoustic wave.
Acoustic wave speed and acoustic impedance differences can exist at the interface between the transducer and the medium to receive the acoustic waveform, e.g., referred to as the receiving medium, for propagation of the acoustic waveform toward the target volume, which can disrupt the transmission of the acoustic signal for imaging, range-Doppler measurement, or therapeutic applications. Acoustic impedance differences caused due to differing material properties (e.g., material density) of the two mediums and the acoustic wave velocity, such that a substantial amount of the emitted acoustic energy will be reflected at the interface rather than transferred in full across the interface. In typical acoustic (e.g., ultrasound) imaging or therapy applications, for example, a transmission gel is applied to the receiving medium (i.e., the skin of a subject) at the interface where the transducers will make contact to improve the transfer of the acoustic waveform(s) from the transducer to the body and the reception of the returned acoustic waveform(s) from the body back to the transducer. In such applications without the ultrasound gel, the interface may include air as a component of the medium between the receiving medium (e.g., living skin tissue) and the transducer, and an acoustic impedance mismatch in the transducer-to-air and the air-to-body discontinuity causes the scattering (e.g., reflection) of the emitted acoustic energy.
Despite relatively good success in reducing acoustic impedance difference at the interface, when applied, acoustic transmission gels may contain tiny packets of air that can disrupt the transmission of acoustic signals. Additionally, many patients complain of discomforts with the use of gels applied to their skin, e.g., such as temperature, stickiness, or other. More concerning, however, acoustic transmission gels can become contaminated during production or storage, which has led to infections within some patients. For subjects with hair on their skin at the location where the transducer is to be placed, these subjects typically must shave or otherwise remove the external hair which exasperates the trapping of air between the skin and gel.
For non-normal angles of incidence of the acoustic wave relative to the interface, the differences in the acoustic wave speed can result in refraction of the acoustic sound wave. Acoustic wave speed differences at the interface cause the propagation path of longitudinal acoustic waves to refract or change direction according to Snell's Law as a function of the angle of incidence and the acoustic wave speeds either side of the interface. Accumulations of infinitesimal amounts of refraction as the wave propagates in a heterogeneous material results in bending or curvature in the path of the acoustic wave.
As conventional ultrasound imaging assumes that acoustic waves travel in straight lines, refraction along the acoustic path causes degradation and distortion in the resulting image due the ambiguity it creates for the arrival time and location of an acoustic waveform in space for both transmission and reception. A material that matches the acoustic wave speed at the interface significantly reduces the effects of refraction, resulting in a clearer and less ambiguous image. Additionally, a material that has a homogeneous acoustic wave speed throughout will minimize the potential for curvature of acoustic wave paths inside the material.
Disclosed are techniques, systems, and devices for coupling acoustic signal transducers to body structures for transmitting and receiving acoustic signals in ultrasound imaging, range-Doppler measurements, and therapies. The disclosed acoustic signal transmission couplants can conform to the receiving medium (e.g., skin) of the subject such that there is an acoustic impedance matching between the receiving medium and the transducer.
Disclosed are also various embodiments of an acoustic coupling medium including a hydrogel formed from one or more polymerizable materials and capable of conforming or molding into specific three dimensional shapes for use in tomographic ultrasound imaging, large aperture ultrasound imaging, and therapeutic ultrasound.
In one embodiment, a couplant device of the disclosed technology for transmission of acoustic energy between transducers and a target includes a housing body including a curved surface on which an array of transducer elements may be disposed; and an acoustic coupling component including a hydrogel material, in which the acoustic coupling component is operable to conduct acoustic signals between a transducer element disposed in the housing body and a receiving medium (e.g., skin of a subject) in contact with the acoustic coupling component to propagate the acoustic signal toward a target volume, such that the acoustic coupling component is capable to conform to the receiving medium such that there is an acoustic impedance matching between the receiving medium and the transducer element. In some embodiments, the couplant device can further include a flexible bracket coupled to and capable of moving with respect to the housing body, in which the flexible bracket secures the acoustic coupling component to the device. For example, the target volume includes a biological structure of a subject (e.g., an organ or tissue), and the receiving medium includes skin of the subject. In implementations of the couplant device, for example, the receiving medium can include hair on the exterior of the skin.
For example, the acoustic coupler 105 can be attached to the housing structure 101 by molding the hydrogel material against the curved section of the housing structure 101 to directly couple the acoustic coupler 105 and the transducer elements 110 at an interface. In such implementations, the housing structure 101 can include a securement mechanism (e.g., such as a clip) at various locations at the curved section to secure the molded acoustic coupler 105 to the housing structure 101, in which the securement mechanism is located on the housing structure 101 at locations away from the transducer elements 110 to not interfere with acoustic signal propagation transmitted and received by the transducer elements. In addition, or alternatively, for example, the housing structure 101 and/or the acoustic coupler 105 can include an adhesive portion to attach the molded acoustic coupler 105 to the curved section of the housing structure 101. In some implementations, for example, the adhesive portion can be configured as an adhesive layer attached to the receiving surface of the curved section of the housing structure 101 and/or an outer portion of the acoustic coupler 105. In some implementations, for example, the adhesive portion can include pretreatment of the outer portion areas of the hydrogel material of the acoustic coupler 105 (e.g., such as applying a low pH solution) to cause such areas to become naturally adhesive.
In some implementations, the acoustic coupler 105 includes a hydrogel material engineered to conduct acoustic signals between transducer elements 110 and a receiving medium (e.g., body region or part of the subject, e.g., such as the subject's midsection, head, or appendage) where the couplant device 100 is to be placed in contact to transmit and receive the acoustic signals propagating toward and from a target volume of interest in the subject. The acoustic coupler 105 is able to conform to the receiving medium to provide acoustic impedance matching between the transducer elements and the receiving medium (e.g., the skin of the subject, including body hair protruded from the skin).
The hydrogel material can be configured to have a selected thickness based on the size of the receiving body of the subject or object of the acoustic imaging, measurement, or therapy application. The diagram of
In some embodiments of the acoustic coupler 105, for example, one side of the hydrogel and/or outer lining is configured to have a tacky surface to contact the transducer elements 110 to promote adherence to the transducer face such that air or other substances are prohibited from becoming entrapped once the couplant device 100 is applied.
In some embodiments of the couplant device 100, for example, the housing structure 101 includes a flexible bracket 102 that attaches to the curved section of the housing structure 101 body. In some implementations, for example, the acoustic coupler 105 can be molded into the flexible bracket 102, which can also include the acoustic coupler 105 being adhesively attached (e.g., glued) to the flexible bracket 102 at portions of the acoustic coupler 105 away from acoustic signal propagation with the transducer elements. The flexible bracket 102 is structured to flex such that it can conform to the receiving body that it surrounds. For example, the flexible bracket 102 can include flexible materials, e.g., including, but not limited to, ABS plastic, polyurethane, nylon, and/or acetyl copolymer.
In some implementations of the couplant device 100, for example, the surface of the acoustic coupler 105 in contact with the subject can be lubricated so it can slide over the skin easily without trapping air bubbles for optimum acoustic transmission. Examples of such lubricants can include treating the side of the hydrogel material that is to be in contact with the subject with degassed and/or deionized water to render that portion of the hydrogel material highly lubricated.
Referring back to
As depicted in
The couplant device 300 can include a flexible bracket 302 to attach to the circular section of the housing structure 301 body to couple the acoustic coupler 105 to the transducer elements 110 housed in the housing structure 301. In some implementations, for example, the acoustic coupler 105 can be molded into the flexible bracket 302, which can include the acoustic coupler 105 being adhesively attached to the flexible bracket 302 at portions of the acoustic coupler 105 away from acoustic signal propagation with the transducer elements.
Referring to
The following examples are illustrative of several embodiments of the present technology. Other exemplary embodiments of the present technology may be presented prior to the following listed examples, or after the following listed examples.
In one example of the present technology (example 1), a couplant device for transmission of acoustic energy between transducers and a target includes an array of transducer elements to transmit acoustic signals toward a target volume and to receive returned acoustic signals that return from at least part of the target volume; a housing body including a curved section on which the array of transducer elements are arranged; and an acoustic coupling component including a hydrogel material, the acoustic coupling component operable to conduct the acoustic signals between a transducer element disposed in the housing body and a receiving medium in contact with the acoustic coupling component to propagate the acoustic signals toward the target volume, in which the acoustic coupling component is capable to conform to the receiving medium and the transducer element such that there is an acoustic impedance matching between the receiving medium and the transducer element.
Example 2 includes the device of example 1, in which the device further includes a flexible bracket coupled to and capable of moving with respect to the housing body, in which the acoustic coupling component is attached to the flexible bracket.
Example 3 includes the device of example 1, in which the hydrogel material includes polyvinyl alcohol (PVA).
Example 4 includes the device of example 1, in which the hydrogel material includes polyacrylamide (PAA).
Example 5 includes the device of example 4, in which the hydrogel material includes alginate.
Example 6 includes the device of example 1, in which the acoustic coupling component includes an outer lining at least partially enclosing the hydrogel material.
Example 7 includes the device of example 1, in which the acoustic coupling component is operable to propagate the acoustic signals with an attenuation factor of 0.1 dB/MHz2·cm or less, or with an impedance of 1.5 MRayls or less.
Example 8 includes the device of example 1, in which the acoustic coupling component is capable to undergo a % elongation of 1000% or greater, or includes a shear modulus of 1 MPa.
Example 9 includes the device of example 1, in which the target volume includes a biological structure of a living subject and the receiving medium includes an anatomical structure of the living subject.
Example 10 includes the device of example 9, in which the curved section of the housing body includes a curvature to facilitate complete contact with the anatomical structure, such that the acoustic coupling component is in direct contact with skin of the anatomical structure.
Example 11 includes the device of example 10, in which the anatomical structure includes hair on the exterior of the skin.
Example 12 includes the device of example 9, in which the anatomical structure includes a breast, an arm, a leg, a neck including the throat, a knee joint, a hip joint, an ankle joint, an elbow joint, a shoulder joint, an abdomen, or a chest, or a head.
Example 13 includes the device of example 9, in which the biological structure includes a cancerous or noncancerous tumor, an internal legion, a connective tissue sprain, a tissue tear, or a bone.
Example 14 includes the device of example 9, in which the subject includes a human or a non-human animal.
Example 15 includes the device of example 1, in which the curved section of the housing body includes a semicircular geometry.
Example 16 includes the device of example 1, in which the curved section of the housing body includes a 360° circular geometry, and the array of transducer elements arranged along the 360° circular section of the housing body.
Example 17 includes the device of example 16, in which the 360° circular section of the housing body and the acoustic coupling component provide a curvature to facilitate complete contact around an anatomical structure of a living subject, and in which the device is operable to receive the returned acoustic signals from the target volume such that an acoustic imaging system in data communication with the device is able to produce a 360° image of the target volume.
Example 18 includes the device of example 1, in which the device further includes a multiplexing unit contained in an interior compartment of the housing body and in communication with the array of transducer elements to select one or more transducing elements of the array to transmit individual acoustic waveforms, and to select one or more transducing elements of the array to receive the returned acoustic waveforms.
In one example of the present technology (example 19), an acoustic waveform system includes a waveform generation unit, an acoustic signal transmission couplant, a multiplexing unit, and a controller unit. The waveform generation unit includes one or more waveform synthesizers coupled to a waveform generator, in which the waveform generation unit is operable to synthesize a composite waveform that includes a plurality of individual orthogonal coded waveforms corresponding to different frequency bands that are generated by the one or more waveform synthesizers according to waveform information provided by the waveform generator, in which the individual orthogonal coded waveforms are mutually orthogonal to each other and correspond to different frequency bands, such that each of the individual orthogonal coded waveforms includes a unique frequency with a corresponding phase. The acoustic signal transmission couplant includes a housing body including a curved section on which transducer elements are arranged; an array of transducer elements to transmit acoustic waveforms corresponding to the individual orthogonal coded waveforms toward a target volume and to receive returned acoustic waveforms that return from at least part of the target volume; and an acoustic coupling component including a hydrogel material, the acoustic coupling component operable to conduct the acoustic waveforms between a transducer element disposed on the housing body and a receiving medium in contact with the acoustic coupling component, in which the acoustic coupling component is capable to conform to the receiving medium and the transducer element such that there is an acoustic impedance matching between the receiving medium and the transducer element. The multiplexing unit is in communication with the array of transducer elements and operable to select one or more transducing elements of an array to transduce the individual orthogonal coded waveforms into the corresponding acoustic waveforms, and operable to select one or more transducing elements of the array to receive the returned acoustic waveforms. The controller unit, which is in communication with the waveform generation unit and the multiplexing unit, includes a processing unit to process the received returned acoustic waveforms to produce a data set including information of at least part of the target volume.
Example 20 includes the system of example 19, further including an array of analog to digital (A/D) converters to convert the received returned acoustic waveforms received by the array of transducer elements of the acoustic signal transmission couplant from analog format to digital format as a received composite waveform that includes information of at least part of the target volume.
Example 21 includes the system of example 19, further including a user interface unit in communication with the controller unit.
Example 22 includes the system of example 19, in which the produced data set includes an image of at least part of the target volume.
Example 23 includes the system of example 19, in which the acoustic signal transmission couplant includes a flexible bracket coupled to and capable of moving with respect to the housing body, in which the acoustic coupling component is attached to the flexible bracket.
Example 24 includes the system of example 23, in which the hydrogel material includes at least one of polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), polyacrylamide (PAA), or PAA with alginate.
Example 25 includes the system of example 19, in which the curved section of the housing body of the acoustic signal transmission couplant includes a semicircular geometry, or the curved section of the housing body of the acoustic signal transmission couplant includes a 360° circular geometry such that the array of transducer elements are arranged along the 360° circular section of the housing body.
Example 26 includes the system of example 25, in which the 360° circular section of the housing body and the acoustic coupling component provide a curvature to facilitate complete contact around an anatomical structure of a living subject, and in which the device is operable to receive the returned acoustic waveforms from the target volume such that the system is able to produce a 360° image of the target volume.
In one example of the present technology (example 27), a method of producing acoustic waveforms using an acoustic impedance matched couplant includes: synthesizing, in one or more waveform synthesizers, one or more composite waveforms to be transmitted toward a target, in which a composite waveform is formed of a plurality of individual orthogonal coded waveforms that are mutually orthogonal to each other and correspond to different frequency bands, such that each of the individual orthogonal coded waveforms includes a unique frequency with a corresponding phase; transmitting, from one or more transmitting positions relative to the target using an array of transducing elements of an acoustic signal transmission couplant, one or more composite acoustic waveforms that includes a plurality of acoustic waveforms, in which the transmitting includes selecting one or more of the transducing elements of the array to transduce the plurality of individual orthogonal coded waveforms of the respective one or more composite waveforms into the plurality of corresponding acoustic waveforms of the respective one or more composite acoustic waveforms; and receiving, at one or more receiving positions relative to the target, returned acoustic waveforms that are returned from at least part of the target corresponding to the transmitted acoustic waveforms, in which the receiving includes selecting at least some of the transducing elements of the array to receive the returned acoustic waveforms, in which the transmitting positions and the receiving positions each include (i) spatial positions of the array of transducer elements relative to the target and/or (ii) beam phase center positions of the array, in which the acoustic signal transmission couplant includes an acoustic coupling component including a hydrogel material operable to conduct the acoustic waveforms between the transducer elements and a receiving medium in contact with the acoustic coupling component, in which the acoustic coupling component is capable to conform to the receiving medium and the transducer element such that there is an acoustic impedance matching between the receiving medium and the transducer element, and in which the transmitted acoustic waveforms and the returned acoustic waveforms produce an enlarged effective aperture.
Example 28 includes the method of example 27, further including processing the received returned acoustic waveforms to produce an image of at least part of the target.
As noted earlier, some of the disclosed embodiments relate to an acoustic coupling medium including a hydrogel formed from one or more polymerizable materials and capable of conforming or molding into specific three dimensional shapes for use in tomographic ultrasound imaging, large aperture ultrasound imaging, and therapeutic ultrasound.
Hydrogel materials contain mostly water, thus, the acoustic wave speed of the hydrogel is dominated by water. The acoustic wave speed in water is approximately proportional to temperature through a high order empirically-determined polynomial relationship from 0 to 100° C. The acoustic wave speed of pure water varies from 1482 m/s to 1524 m/s from 20° C. to 37° C., respectively. Thus, the acoustic wave speed in a polymeric material will vary with temperature.
A material with a calibrated acoustic wave speed may be used in combination with a delay-and-sum beamformer to correct the propagation times on transmission and reception in order to reduce image distortion created by uncalibrated coupling materials. For example, the location of a structure such as a tissue-bone interface is ambiguous without knowledge of the average acoustic wave speed between the array and the bone. The true location of the bone may be deeper or shallower than it measures on the ultrasound image.
A material with a temperature calibrated acoustic wave speed such that the material may be heated in order to provide a more comfortable interface to the patient without creating image distortion. Besides patient comfort, a heated material also supports increased blood flow in the region in contact with the patient and in regions peripheral to the region in contact, thus facilitating more accurate Doppler measurements. A material with a calibrated acoustic wave speed will also function optimally at a target temperature (e.g. 37° C.) or target range of temperatures (e.g. 20-37° C.).
Thermocouples, thermistors, fiber-optic thermometers or other temperature sensing devices may be implanted into the hydrogel to provide real-time temperature feedback. Additionally, wires, resistors, thermopiles, electrical current, infrared radiation, water pipes, conduction, or other means to heat the hydrogel may be utilized to heat the gel. A temperature feedback and control device may be utilized to precisely and accurately control the temperature of the hydrogel.
The disclosed acoustic coupling medium can be employed in acoustic imaging, range-Doppler measurement, and therapeutic systems to transfer emitted and returned acoustic waveforms between such acoustic systems and a receiving medium, such as tissue of a living organism.
In some implementations of the disclosed acoustic coupling technology, for example, a hydrogel acoustic coupling medium of the present technology can provide spatially-varying acoustic absorption for use with acoustic imaging, diagnostic and/or therapeutic devices or systems to provide tomographic ultrasound imaging, large aperture ultrasound imaging arrays, and therapeutic ultrasound arrays for such acoustic devices and systems. In some implementations of the disclosed technology, the hydrogel acoustic coupling medium can couple acoustic waves from acoustic energy sources into the hydrogel acoustic coupling medium and subsequently into secondary media with acoustic sound speeds ranging from 1400 m/s up to 1700 m/s. Examples of the secondary media include, but are not limited to, mammalian tissues and water. The secondary media may contain structures with sound speeds outside the sound speed range of the coupling medium, e.g., such as bone, implanted devices, plastics, ceramics, glass, and metals.
In practical applications of ultrasound imaging, particularly for imaging human and nonhuman animals, ultrasound image formation typically occurs in the near field of an acoustic emission aperture, which poses several challenges for obtaining high resolution and quality ultrasound images. For example, in such ultrasound imaging applications, generally, one or more transducer elements are included in an acoustic imaging device, forming an array, to generate the acoustic aperture. These transducer elements typically require several wavelengths to transition from the near field to the far field regime following an acoustic emission, thus requiring an acoustic buffer region, also known as an acoustic standoff. For example, this acoustic buffer region or acoustic standoff may be necessary for image formation close to the acoustic aperture. Furthermore, focused image formation typically requires that the ratio of the focal depth divided by the aperture size (e.g., also known as the f-number) be greater than one, e.g., for points of the image formation closest to the acoustic aperture. Likewise, the acoustic standoff is necessary for image formation close to the acoustic aperture in order to satisfy the f-number condition.
In implementations of the disclosed technology, the image formation is generated using combinations of the transducer elements, in which a selected group of transducer elements are used to produce an acoustic emission followed by reception of return acoustic echoes on some, the same, and/or other transducer elements of the group. For example, the transducer elements producing the acoustic emission are referred to as transmit elements. Likewise, the transducer elements that receive the return acoustic echoes are referred to as receive elements. In some examples, the combinations may be divided into combinations of individual pairs of transmit and receive elements such that the linear combination of the pairs produces an approximately equivalent image as obtained using the combinations of one or more elements on both transmit and receive. For example, each time sample of an echo recorded from the pair of transmit and receive elements is an integration of acoustic reflectivity over the corresponding round-trip time or time delay corresponding to the time sample. The integration is a line integral over linear paths of the constant round-trip time or time delay. The linear paths can be circular or elliptical as determined by the location of the pair of transmit and receive elements. In practice, for example, the circular or elliptical paths may extend to highly reflective interfaces including, but not limited to, the interface between the acoustic coupling medium and a low acoustic impedance material, e.g., such as air or plastic, or the interface between the acoustic coupling medium and a high acoustic impedance material, e.g., such as metal or ceramic.
Acoustic reflections from the interfaces, also known as specular reflections, contaminate the line integrals of reflectivity and the corresponding echo samples obtained from the transmit and receive combinations. In general, for the acoustic reflections observed for the combination of transmit and receive elements, the angle of incidence measured from the transmit element to a point on the reflective interface to the surface normal vector for a point lying on the reflective interface equals the angle of reflection measured from the same normal vector to the vector defined by the point on reflective interface to the receive element. The acoustic reflection can have mirror or amphichiral symmetry. The acoustic reflection has power equal to the acoustic impedance of the secondary medium minus the acoustic impedance of the coupling medium, divided by the acoustic impedance of the secondary medium plus the acoustic impedance of the coupling medium, as described in Equation (1).
The contamination caused by the acoustic reflection can preclude the use of the transmit and receive combinations in beamformers based on delayed and summed echo samples, also known as a delay-and-sum beamformer. Such preclusion of echo samples can result in removal of the transmit and receive combination from the delay-and-sum beamformer, thus limiting the quality of the image pixel corresponding to the delay-and-sum beamformer. The image pixel quality is a function of the point-spread-function of the limited set of transmit and receive combinations.
Such preclusion of echo samples can also reduce the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) for the image pixel. Additionally, for the apertures with an array pitch greater than one-half wavelength, the image pixel locations that require transmitter and receiver combinations to steer away from zero degrees 0°) will be increasingly subject to grating lobes with increasing steering angle and increasing array pitch. Such grating lobes add to the sensitivity and complexity of the specular reflections.
The acoustic coupling medium of the disclosed technology can be configured in an acoustic couplant device and operable to conduct acoustic signals between a transducer element disposed in a housing body of the couplant device and a receiving medium (i.e., the secondary medium, e.g., skin of a subject) in contact with the acoustic coupling medium to propagate the acoustic signal toward a target volume. The disclosed acoustic coupling medium is capable to conform to the target volume such that there is an acoustic impedance matching (e.g., very low reflection) between the receiving medium and the transducer element.
The disclosed acoustic coupling medium is configured to have three-dimensional shape. In some examples of the disclosed acoustic coupling medium, for example, an acoustic coupling medium is engineered into a specific three-dimensional shape for a particular implementation utility, e.g., for tomographic acoustic imaging, large aperture acoustic imaging, and/or therapeutic acoustic treatment. In one example embodiment shown in
Additionally, the tubular coupling medium is compatible with tomographic apertures ranging from 0 to 360 degrees around the secondary medium, e.g., subject's limbs, torso, head, etc., while maintaining acoustic contact over the entire aperture and secondary medium, simultaneously. With applied force, constant contact may be maintained with movement of the aperture over the coupling medium. For example, the tomographic apertures with a polygon shape, the flexible coupling medium maintains contact over the surface of the entire aperture, including between facets of the polygon. The exemplary tubular shape of the acoustic coupling medium 505A may be molded to match any three-dimensional shape of the aperture, including polygon shapes. For example, for tomographic apertures less than 360 degrees, the exemplary tubular acoustic coupling medium 505A does not have highly reflective air interfaces at sharp edges that would exist for coupling media extending only over the aperture. At the edges of the aperture, the transmit and receive combinations are able to function unrestricted by the tubular coupling medium 505A, thus obviating the need for preclusion of the combination from the beamformer. The reflective air interface extending around the entire coupling medium keeps wide angle and primary reflections internally reflecting around the acoustic coupling medium 505A, where they are attenuated and end up being incoherent acoustic noise.
In addition to a tubular shape, the acoustic coupling medium may be shaped with a partial tubular shape of less than 360 degrees in the transverse plane, such that it can partially cover the secondary medium of the subject, e.g., subject's limbs, torso, head, etc., and can extend up to or beyond the boundaries of the aperture, as shown in
In some embodiments of the acoustic coupling medium, the partial tubular acoustic coupling medium 505F may be structured to include acoustically attenuating regions in one or more portions of the acoustic coupling medium. As shown in
In various embodiments of the disclosed acoustic coupling medium, the hydrogel can include one or more polymerizable materials that polymerize in the presence of water into hydrophilic gels formed from a natural or synthetic network of polymer chains. Examples of such polymerizable materials include, but are not limited to, polymers and polymer derivatives, alginate, agarose, sodium alginate, chitosan, starch, hydroxyethyl starch, dextran, glucan, gelatin, Poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA), Poly (N-isopropylacrylamide) (NIPAAm), Poly(vinylpyrrolidone) (PVP), Poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG), Poly(acrylic acid) (PAA), acrylate polymers, Polyacrylamide (PAM), Poly(hydroxyethyl acrylate) (PHEA), Poly(2-propenamide), Poly(1-carbamoylethylene), and Poly(hydroxyethyl methacrylate) (PHEMA). In fabrication techniques to produce the hydrogel, the polymerizable materials can be polymerized through several processes, which may involve toxic or non-toxic chemical compounds, ultraviolet light, irradiation, toxic or nontoxic solvents, temperature cycling, and freeze-thaw cycling. In some implementations to produce the hydrogel, polymerization of the hydrogel through freeze-thaw cycling can be performed, due to the absence of potentially toxic compounds.
For example, the hydrogel can include a material structure that allows acoustic signal propagation with an attenuation factor of 1.0 dB/MHz/cm or less, an impedance of 2.0 MRayls or less, and a longitudinal speed of sound of 1700 m/s or less at 20° C. The acoustic coupler 105 is engineered to have a % elongation of 100% or greater, a density ranging from 1.00-1.20 g/cm3, a shear modulus of less than 1 MPa, and melting and freezing points near 70° C. and −5° C., respectively. For example, the hydrogel material can be at least 90% water and have a pH of ˜7.0.
In a some embodiments of the acoustic coupling medium, the hydrogel can primarily include water or equivalent solvent and the polymer Poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) through the example polymerization process of freeze-thaw cycling, which is a biocompatible polymer and a biocompatible polymerization process for the polymer. The addition of other components, e.g., such as solvents (such as ethyl alcohol or dimethyl sulfoxide) and/or other polymers (such as alginate or gelatin), to this example PVA hydrogel may be employed, as such additional components can be used to improve mechanical or acoustic properties. For example, the addition of one or more bacteriostatic chemicals with sufficient concentration and compatibility with the hydrogel integrity can maintain sterility of the hydrogel during storage and use. Notwithstanding other mechanically, acoustically, and biologically equivalent formulations, the utility of a hydrogel for its acoustic properties due to its high water content, its high tensile strength, and its elasticity is an advantageous feature of the disclosed acoustic coupling medium. The sound speed and acoustic attenuation of the hydrogel may be controlled by varying polymer concentration, water concentration, additional solvent concentration, degree of polymerization, method of polymerization, and inclusion of additional materials such as scattering and/or acoustically absorbing materials.
In one embodiment, for example, the hydrogel includes PVA in a weight ratio of 1-10% and H2O in a weight ratio of 90-99%. The hydrogel is cross-linked through application of 1-10 controlled freeze-thaw cycles cycling in the range of −40° C. to 70° C.
In another embodiment, for example, the hydrogel includes PVA in a weight ratio of 1-10%, DMSO in a weight ratio of 1-10%, and H2O in a weight ratio of 80-98%. The hydrogel is cross-linked through application of 1-10 controlled freeze-thaw cycles cycling in the range of −40° C. to 70° C.
In another embodiment, for example, the hydrogel includes PVA in a weight ratio of 4-10%, PVP in a weight ratio of 1-5%, DMSO in a weight ratio of 1-10%, and H2O in a weight ratio of 75-94%. The hydrogel is cross-linked through application of 1-10 controlled freeze-thaw cycles cycling in the range of −40° C. to 70° C.
In another embodiment, for example, the hydrogel includes PVA in a weight ratio of 4-10%, PVP in a weight ratio of 1-5%, polyethylene glycol in a weight ratio of 1-5%, and H2O in a weight ratio of 80-94%. The hydrogel is cross-linked through application of 1-10 controlled freeze-thaw cycles cycling in the range of −40° C. to 70° C.
In another embodiment, for example, the hydrogel includes PVA in a weight ratio of 4-10%, PVP in a weight ratio of 1-5%, sodium tetraborate in a weight ratio of 1-5%, and H2O in a weight ratio of 80-94%. The borate ions react with hydroxyl groups to cross-link the polymer. The mixture is maintained at a constant temperature during cross-linking.
Implementations of the subject matter and the functional operations described in this patent document can be implemented in various systems, digital electronic circuitry, or in computer software, firmware, or hardware, including the structures disclosed in this specification and their structural equivalents, or in combinations of one or more of them. Implementations of the subject matter described in this specification can be implemented as one or more computer program products, i.e., one or more modules of computer program instructions encoded on a tangible and non-transitory computer readable medium for execution by, or to control the operation of, data processing apparatus. The computer readable medium can be a machine-readable storage device, a machine-readable storage substrate, a memory device, a composition of matter effecting a machine-readable propagated signal, or a combination of one or more of them. The term “data processing apparatus” encompasses all apparatus, devices, and machines for processing data, including by way of example a programmable processor, a computer, or multiple processors or computers. The apparatus can include, in addition to hardware, code that creates an execution environment for the computer program in question, e.g., code that constitutes processor firmware, a protocol stack, a database management system, an operating system, or a combination of one or more of them.
A computer program (also known as a program, software, software application, script, or code) can be written in any form of programming language, including compiled or interpreted languages, and it can be deployed in any form, including as a stand-alone program or as a module, component, subroutine, or other unit suitable for use in a computing environment. A computer program does not necessarily correspond to a file in a file system. A program can be stored in a portion of a file that holds other programs or data (e.g., one or more scripts stored in a markup language document), in a single file dedicated to the program in question, or in multiple coordinated files (e.g., files that store one or more modules, sub programs, or portions of code).
A computer program can be deployed to be executed on one computer or on multiple computers that are located at one site or distributed across multiple sites and interconnected by a communication network.
The processes and logic flows described in this specification can be performed by one or more programmable processors executing one or more computer programs to perform functions by operating on input data and generating output. The processes and logic flows can also be performed by, and apparatus can also be implemented as, special purpose logic circuitry, e.g., an FPGA (field programmable gate array) or an ASIC (application specific integrated circuit).
Processors suitable for the execution of a computer program include, by way of example, both general and special purpose microprocessors, and any one or more processors of any kind of digital computer. Generally, a processor will receive instructions and data from a read only memory or a random access memory or both. The essential elements of a computer are a processor for performing instructions and one or more memory devices for storing instructions and data. Generally, a computer will also include, or be operatively coupled to receive data from or transfer data to, or both, one or more mass storage devices for storing data, e.g., magnetic, magneto optical disks, or optical disks. However, a computer need not have such devices. Computer readable media suitable for storing computer program instructions and data include all forms of nonvolatile memory, media and memory devices, including by way of example semiconductor memory devices, e.g., EPROM, EEPROM, and flash memory devices. The processor and the memory can be supplemented by, or incorporated in, special purpose logic circuitry.
While this patent document contain many specifics, these should not be construed as limitations on the scope of any invention or of what may be claimed, but rather as descriptions of features that may be specific to particular embodiments of particular inventions. Certain features that are described in this patent document in the context of separate embodiments can also be implemented in combination in a single embodiment. Conversely, various features that are described in the context of a single embodiment can also be implemented in multiple embodiments separately or in any suitable subcombination. Moreover, although features may be described above as acting in certain combinations and even initially claimed as such, one or more features from a claimed combination can in some cases be excised from the combination, and the claimed combination may be directed to a subcombination or variation of a subcombination.
Similarly, while operations are depicted in the drawings in a particular order, this should not be understood as requiring that such operations be performed in the particular order shown or in sequential order, or that all illustrated operations be performed, to achieve desirable results. Moreover, the separation of various system components in the embodiments described in this patent document should not be understood as requiring such separation in all embodiments.
Only a few implementations and examples are described and other implementations, enhancements and variations can be made based on what is described and illustrated in this patent document.
This patent document claims the benefit of priority of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/120,839, filed on Feb. 25, 2015, and U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/174,999, filed on Jun. 12, 2015. The entire contents of the before-mentioned patent applications are incorporated by reference as part of the disclosure of this document.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4105018 | Greenleaf et al. | Aug 1978 | A |
4110755 | Zottl | Aug 1978 | A |
4159462 | Rocha et al. | Jun 1979 | A |
4277367 | Madsen et al. | Jul 1981 | A |
4437468 | Sorenson | Mar 1984 | A |
4463608 | Takeuchi et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
4620546 | Aida et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4821206 | Arora | Apr 1989 | A |
4830015 | Okazaki | May 1989 | A |
4888746 | Wurster et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
5039774 | Shikinami et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5181513 | Touboul et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5241964 | McQuilkin | Sep 1993 | A |
5269309 | Fort et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5284143 | Rattner | Feb 1994 | A |
5329944 | Fabian et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5394877 | Orr et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5417218 | Spivey | May 1995 | A |
5445144 | Wodicka et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5465722 | Fort et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5533510 | Koch, III et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5608690 | Hossack et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5623928 | Wright et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5793701 | Wright et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5800356 | Criton et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5803089 | Ferre et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5806518 | Mittelstadt | Sep 1998 | A |
5829444 | Ferre et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5868676 | McCabe et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5873830 | Hossack et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5882557 | Hayakawa | Mar 1999 | A |
5902244 | Kobayashi et al. | May 1999 | A |
5913823 | Hedberg et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5967980 | Ferre et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6016285 | Wright et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6045507 | Muzilla et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6050945 | Peterson et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6083164 | Oppelt et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6106464 | Bass et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6110114 | Nock et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6113544 | Mo | Sep 2000 | A |
6123669 | Kanda | Sep 2000 | A |
6132375 | Napolitano | Oct 2000 | A |
6157592 | Kriz et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6205411 | DiGioia, III et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6231834 | Unger et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6241676 | Savord | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6322567 | Mittelstadt et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6338765 | Statnikov | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6340363 | Bolger et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6341231 | Ferre et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6402707 | Ernst | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6436045 | Rafter et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6445943 | Ferre et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6508766 | Sato et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6537216 | Shifrin | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6583392 | Hershey et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6585648 | Robinson | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6620101 | Azzam et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6626916 | Yeung et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6652461 | Levkovitz | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6687531 | Ferre et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6725082 | Sati et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6736780 | Song et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6757582 | Brisson et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6785571 | Glossop | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6786097 | Song et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6796988 | Melkent et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6808494 | Shifrin | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6843957 | Statnikov | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6918877 | Hossack et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6934575 | Ferre et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6939300 | Petersen et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6960173 | Babaev | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7004906 | Guracar et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7066886 | Song et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7207939 | Husher | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7226456 | O'Neil et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7291119 | de Guise et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7344609 | Statnikov | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7395181 | Foxlin | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7473250 | Makin et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7532201 | Quistgaard et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7542790 | Jensen et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7566304 | Nakamura et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7678049 | Tsoref et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7719515 | Fujiwara et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7719689 | Lee et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7728487 | Adachi et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7763035 | Melkent et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7798585 | Oguri | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7806823 | Sakai et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7826889 | David et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7835778 | Foley et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7835784 | Mire et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7837625 | Abe | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7905836 | Dan | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7917317 | McKeon | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7938777 | Amiot et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7938778 | Sakai | May 2011 | B2 |
7982362 | Adachi et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8002705 | Napolitano et al. | Aug 2011 | B1 |
8038616 | Angelsen et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8043220 | Okada et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8103461 | Glaser et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8105339 | Melkent et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8126533 | Lavallee | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8147409 | Shifrin | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8152726 | Amiot et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8165658 | Waynik et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8241217 | Chiang et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8251908 | Vortman et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8253578 | Watabe et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8311611 | Csavoy et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8323200 | Kunita | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8372070 | Tanaka et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8374674 | Gertner | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8409099 | Vitek et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8409103 | Grunwald et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8444564 | Mahfouz et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8447388 | Igarashi | May 2013 | B2 |
8491476 | Iwama et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8556834 | Gertner | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8565860 | Kimchy et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8626267 | Lavallee | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8675939 | Moctezuma de la Barrera | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8771188 | Schers et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8774900 | Buly et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8814810 | Roche et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8864686 | Roche et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8880152 | Lavallee | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8909325 | Kimchy et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8939909 | Wegner | Jan 2015 | B2 |
9060794 | Kang et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9101394 | Arata et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9174065 | Gertner | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9196046 | Meyer | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9220571 | Lavallee | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9244169 | Fan et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9248001 | Colombet et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9352171 | Gertner | May 2016 | B2 |
9387276 | Sun et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9420999 | Wegner | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9572548 | Moctezuma de la Barrera | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9597058 | Kanayama et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9844359 | Wegner | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9872667 | Wegner | Jan 2018 | B2 |
1008572 | Wegner | Oct 2018 | A1 |
1032188 | Wegner | Jun 2019 | A1 |
10426429 | Kruse et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
20020068871 | Mendlein | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020099290 | Haddad | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020122536 | Kerrien et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020188229 | Ryaby | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030036702 | Davidsen | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030125628 | Song et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040066708 | Ogawa | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040236223 | Barnes et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050101861 | Satoh | May 2005 | A1 |
20050101867 | Johnson et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050203399 | Vaezy | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050215893 | Barnes et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060004290 | Smith et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060119223 | Ossmann | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060173305 | Asafusa et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070066897 | Sekins | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070156050 | Barnes et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070226976 | Zipparo et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070239001 | Mehi et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070239002 | Alam | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070265690 | Lichtenstein et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070276238 | Sudol | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080110263 | Klessel et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080119737 | Urbano et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080200810 | Buchalter | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080208055 | Bertram et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080281202 | Fraser | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080281237 | Slayton | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090043206 | Towfiq et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090124871 | Arshak et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090306497 | Manzke et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100029789 | Chen | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100204577 | Sekins et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100268072 | Hall et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100274139 | Fukukita et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100280379 | Satoh | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100286518 | Lee et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100286527 | Cannon | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110092862 | Chivers | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110264012 | Lautzenhiser | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120029345 | Mahfouz et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120238875 | Savitsky et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120281507 | Rikoski | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130060121 | Patwardhan et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130123635 | Wegner | May 2013 | A1 |
20130144135 | Mahfouz et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130144166 | Specht et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130150863 | Baumgartner | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130165005 | Berard-Andersen | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130218013 | Barthe et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140163377 | Kang et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140180116 | Lindekugel | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140353248 | Kuraray | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150018682 | Schers et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150038613 | Sun | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150080725 | Wegner | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150088040 | Barthe et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150133788 | Mauldin, Jr. et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150164467 | Suetoshi et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150182191 | Caluser et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150313572 | Gerbaulet | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160000409 | Bruder et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160100821 | Eggers et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160270763 | Hayes et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160354520 | Sun et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20180126677 | Zhao et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20190167234 | Wegner | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190200957 | Freiburg et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2427186 | May 2001 | CA |
2852801 | May 2013 | CA |
100354651 | Dec 2007 | CN |
102258399 | Nov 2012 | CN |
104169739 | Nov 2014 | CN |
0952461 | Oct 1999 | EP |
1707124 | Apr 2006 | EP |
1795917 | Jun 2007 | EP |
1854406 | Nov 2007 | EP |
1955668 | Aug 2008 | EP |
2033579 | Mar 2009 | EP |
2379392 | Mar 2003 | GB |
2472066 | Jan 2011 | GB |
232148 | Jul 2019 | IL |
55051351 | Apr 1980 | JP |
58195550 | Nov 1983 | JP |
60048736 | Mar 1985 | JP |
62117535 | May 1987 | JP |
08038473 | Feb 1996 | JP |
2000041980 | Feb 2000 | JP |
2000287988 | Oct 2000 | JP |
2003190157 | Jul 2003 | JP |
2004147852 | May 2004 | JP |
2005152608 | Jun 2005 | JP |
2007152127 | Jun 2007 | JP |
2010082425 | Apr 2010 | JP |
2011062531 | Mar 2011 | JP |
2011177461 | Sep 2011 | JP |
2012002586 | Jan 2012 | JP |
2013056156 | Mar 2013 | JP |
2013539715 | Oct 2013 | JP |
2014533154 | Dec 2014 | JP |
2002024094 | Mar 2002 | WO |
2007023477 | Mar 2007 | WO |
2009009064 | Jan 2009 | WO |
2009020617 | Feb 2009 | WO |
2009063421 | May 2009 | WO |
2013066821 | May 2013 | WO |
2013103956 | Jul 2013 | WO |
2014128593 | Aug 2014 | WO |
2014150780 | Sep 2014 | WO |
2014150961 | Sep 2014 | WO |
2014186904 | Nov 2014 | WO |
2015038554 | Mar 2015 | WO |
2016044830 | Mar 2016 | WO |
2016138257 | Sep 2016 | WO |
2016149427 | Sep 2016 | WO |
2017164902 | Sep 2017 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Koch, A., et al., “An Ultrasound Tomography System With Polyvinyl Alcohol (PVA) Moldings for Coupling: In Vivo Results for 3-D Pulse-Echo Imaging of the Female Breast,” IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, 62(2):266-279, Feb. 2015. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 6, 2016 for International Application No. PCT/US2016/019554, filed on Feb. 25, 2016 (12 pages). |
Australian Exam Report dated Nov. 1, 2019 for Australian Application No. 2016233279, filed on Mar. 16, 2016 (3 pages). |
Australian Exam Report dated Oct. 18, 2019 for Australian Application No. 2016222637, filed on Feb. 25, 2016 (3 pages). |
Callow, H.J., “Signal Processing for Synthetic Aperture Sonar Image Enhancement,” Thesis for Ph.D. in Electrical and Electronic Engineering at the University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand, 273 pages, Apr. 2003. |
Cao, Z. et al., “Fabrication and properties of thermosensitive organic/inorganic hybrid hydrogel thin films,” Langmuir, American Chemical Society, vol. 24, No. 10, May 20, 2008, pp. 5543-5551. |
Chiao, R., “Coded Excitation for Diagnostic Ultrasound: A System Developer's Perspective,” IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, 52(2):160-170, Feb. 2005. |
Choe, J.W., et al., “Volumetric real-time imaging using a CMUT ring array,” IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, 59(6):1201-1211, Jun. 2012. |
Demi, L., et al., “In Vitro and In Vivo Tissue Harmonic Images Obtained With Parallel Transmit Beamforming by Means of Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing,” IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, 62(1):230-235, Jan. 2015. |
European Search Report dated Apr. 19, 2017 for European Application No. 14844538.0, filed on Sep. 9, 2014 (10 pages). |
European Search Report dated Feb. 1, 2019 for European Application No. 16756353.5, filed on Feb. 25, 2016 (14 pages). |
European Search Report dated Jun. 29, 2015 for European Application No. 12845256.2, filed on Oct. 29, 2012 (8 pages). |
European Search Report dated Nov. 9, 2018 for European Application No. 16765701.4, filed on Mar. 16, 2016 (6 pages). |
Extended European Search Report dated Feb. 15, 2019 for European Application No. 16765701.4, filed on Mar. 16, 2016 (14 pages). |
Extended European Search Report dated Jul. 2, 2019 for European Application No. 16756353.5, filed on Feb. 25, 2016 (14 pages). |
Extended Search Report dated Jun. 18, 2019 for European Application No. 16854507.7, filed on Oct. 7, 2016 (11 pages). |
Hunter, A.J., et al., “A Comparison of Fast Factorised Back-Projection and Wavenumber Algorithms for SAS Image Reconstruction,” Proceedings of the World Congress on Ultrasonics, 4 pages, (2003). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Dec. 29, 2016 for International Application No. PCT/US2016/056159, filed on Oct. 7, 2016 (7 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 3, 2015 for International Application No. PCT/US2014/054855, filed on Sep. 9, 2014 (11 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 15, 2013 for International Application No. PCT/US2012/062435, filed on Oct. 29, 2012 (9 pages). |
Ito, T., et al., “Evaluation of Acoustic Imaging System Using Correlation Division in Synthetic Transmit Aperture with Multicarrier Signals,” IEICE Transactions on Fundamentals of Electronics, Communications and Computer Sciences, E94-A(10):1907-1919, Oct. 2011. |
Jensen, J.A., et al., “Synthetic Aperture Ultrasound Imaging,” Ultrasonics, 44(Suppl 1):e5-e15, Dec. 2006. |
Kundur, D., et al., “A Novel Blind Deconvolution Scheme for Image Restoration Using Recursive Filtering,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 46(2):375-390, Feb. 1998. |
Misaridis, T., “Use of Modulated Excitation Signals in Medical Ultrasound. Part I: Basic Concepts and Expected Benefits,” IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, 52(2):177-191, Feb. 2005. |
Misaridis, T., “Use of Modulated Excitation Signals in Medical Ultrasound. Part II: Design and Performance for Medical Imaging Applications,” IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, 52(2):192-207, Feb. 2005. |
Misaridis, T., “Use of Modulated Excitation Signals in Medical Ultrasound. Part III: High Frame Rate Imaging,” IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, 52(2):208-219, Feb. 2005. |
O'Donnell, M., “Coded Excitation for Synthetic Aperture Ultrasound Imaging,” IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, 52(2):171-176, Feb. 2005. |
Office Action dated Jul. 3, 2018 for Japanese Application No. 2017-187288, filed on Oct. 29, 2012 (6 pages). |
Office Action dated Sep. 13, 2016 for Japanese Application No. 2014-539114, filed on Oct. 29, 2012 (4 pages). |
Office Action dated Sep. 19, 2017 for Japanese Application No. 2016-542050, filed on Sep. 9, 2014 (15 pages). |
Office Action dated Jun. 4, 2019 for Japanese Application No. 2017-187288, filed on Oct. 29, 2012 (3 pages). |
Office Action dated Oct. 29, 2019 for Japanese Application No. 2018-145683, filed on Sep. 9, 2014 (3 pages). |
Office Action dated Sep. 2, 2015 for Chinese Application No. 201280065031.4, filed on Oct. 29, 2012 (26 pages). |
Prokop A F et al., “Polyacrylamide gel as an acoustic coupling medium for focused ultrasound therapy.” Ultrasound in Medicine and Biol, New York, NY, US, vol. 29, No. 9, Sep. 1, 2003, pp. 1351-1358. |
Rui Silva, S., et al., “2 Synthetic Aperture Techniques for Sonar Systems,” Advances in Sonar Technology, edited by Sergio Rui Silva, publisher I-Tech Education and Publishing, ISBN 978-3-902613-48-6, pp. 15-42, Feb. 2009. |
Singapore Exam Report dated Feb. 26, 2019 for Singapore Application No. 11201706953Y, filed on Feb. 25, 2016 (6 pages). |
Singapore Search Report dated Sep. 24, 2018 for Singapore Application No. 11201706953Y, filed on Feb. 25, 2016 (13 pages). |
Singapore Written Opinion dated Jul. 10, 2017 for Singapore Application No. 11201601906P, filed on Sep. 9, 2014 (8 pages). |
Singapore Written Opinion dated Jun. 21, 2018 for Singapore Application No. 11201707641P, filed on Mar. 16, 2016 (8 pages). |
Zhu, S., et al., “SAS Autofocus Based on Phase Gradient Autofocus,” IEEE 2011 Fourth International Workshop on Chaos-Fractals Theories and Applications (IWCFTA), pp. 298-301, Oct. 19-22, 2011. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 18, 2020 for International Application No. PCT/US20/18123, filed on Feb. 13, 2020 (11 pages). |
Office Action dated Dec. 4, 2019 for Chinese Application No. 201680023999.9, filed on Feb. 25, 2016 (23 pages). |
Examination Report dated Dec. 20, 2019 for Europe Patent Application No. 14844538.0, filed on Sep. 9, 2014 (7 pages). |
Office Action dated Jan. 13, 2020 for Chinese Application No. 201680028663.1, filed on Mar. 16, 2016 (17 pages). |
Office Action dated Jan. 14, 2020 for Japanese Application No. 2017-563504, filed on Feb. 25, 2016 (14 pages). |
Office Action dated Mar. 17, 2020 for Japanese Application No. 2018-145683, filed on Sep. 9, 2014 (4 pages). |
Office Action dated Feb. 25, 2020 for Japanese Application No. 2017-549178, filed on Mar. 16, 2016 (8 pages). |
Singapore Written Opinion dated Mar. 11, 2020 for Singapore Application No. 11201707641P, filed on Mar. 16, 2016 (8 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160242736 A1 | Aug 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62120839 | Feb 2015 | US | |
62174999 | Jun 2015 | US |