Patent Application
20110300332
The object of the invention is a new perforated acoustic tile that presents the advantage of ensuring air pollution removal under visible and ultraviolet light irradiation, particularly by photocatalysis.
Acoustic tiles are well known products that are intended to be applied to walls or ceilings. The acoustic tiles related to the invention are perforated acoustic tile supports that are covered on their entire rear surface, that is, their non-visible face, with a nonwoven material. The support may vary and generally is most often in the form of plaster boards, but also, in certain cases, in the form of metal boards, wood boards or PVC boards and, more generally, in any type of material.
The boards of the invention have numerous applications, particularly in public buildings, train stations, airports, hospitals, nurseries, offices, etc.
The principle of photocatalysis consisting of destroying various organic pollutants in air is also a well known principle. In practice, the photocatalytic reaction is initiated by activating a semi-conductive solid and particularly TiO2 by UV radiation with a wavelength of less than 380 nm or visible radiation (depending on the characteristics of the TiO2), causing electronic changes within the semiconductor and leading to, in the presence of air, the creation of oxygenated radicals at the surface of the semiconductor. These radicals attack the organic compounds adsorbed on the semiconductor and, by a succession of chemical reactions involving water and oxygen from the air, degrade the organic compounds until the carbon from the carbon chains is completely transformed into carbon dioxide.
The idea of conferring photocatalytic properties to acoustic tiles is already known and, in particular, was described in document WO-A1-99/51345of the Applicant. In particular, this document describes the possibility of applying a TiO2-based paint onto the acoustic tile support. Although it is satisfactory in terms of pollution removal, such a solution prohibits the reworking of the ceiling or wall inasmuch as the application of a new paint layer on the photocatalytic composition will destroy its effects. It is thus necessary in such a case to apply a new layer of photocatalytic paint, which is a particularly costly measure. Considering these major disadvantages, this solution has never been implemented.
To get around this problem, a second solution could have been to incorporate the photocatalytic agent, particularly TiO2 directly into the support.
However, this solution is not completely satisfactory inasmuch as the photocatalytic effect would only be effective near the perforations and not on the entire tile surface. In addition, such a solution would be likely to only relate to plaster tiles and not to wood or metal tiles.
Document U.S.-A1-2006/0137276 describes the idea of incorporating zeolite into plaster boards. The zeolite will have the effect of adsorbing the pollutant, but contrary to what has been indicated, the zeolite will not be regenerated since zeolite is not a semiconductor. Thus, it does not act like a photocatalytic agent and does not destroy, in contact with UV or visible radiation, the previously attached pollutant agents. By operating according to an adsorption mechanism, the efficacy of zeolite is thus independent from the radiation to which it is subjected. In other words, even if the zeolite ensures effective pollution removal, this short-term efficiency is limited due to the saturation phenomenon.
Document DE-U1-20102074 describes an acoustic tile consisting of a perforated support to the reverse face of which a continuous sheet of plastic or aluminum is applied and the front side of which is provided with a waterproof sheet capable of receiving an ‘acoustic treatment’. The nature of the treatment or the sheet itself is not discussed. In any case, due to the waterproof character of the sheet, it cannot be a nonwoven support.
Document US-A1-2003/0082367 describes a support covered with a photocatalytic composition. Different kinds of supports (glass, plastic, textile) can be used for different applications (siding, ceiling, walls). The woven or nonwoven character of the textile is not discussed.
For this reason, the Applicant is focused on the development of an acoustic tile that removes pollution by the photocatalysis phenomenon, which does not present the disadvantages of the tiles described in document WO-A1-99/51345.
The Applicant has observed that in a completely surprising manner, the application of TiO2 directly onto the nonwoven material of the tile confers a particularly effective pollution removing activity to said tile.
In other words, the object of the invention is an acoustic tile comprising a perforated support in which one of the faces is covered by a nonwoven material over its entire surface.
The tile is characterized in that at least one face of the nonwoven material is covered by a photocatalytic composition comprising at least one photocatalytic agent.
In other words, the invention consists of applying the photocatalytic composition not on the front face of the tile, directly on the support, but on at least one of the faces of the nonwoven material arranged onto the rear face of the tile. Such a configuration avoids the tile reworking problem while ensuring optimal photocatalytic activity, particularly in offices in daylight or artificial light. In fact, in the two cases, the radiation spectrum is comprised of UV and visible light allowing the photocatalysis phenomenon to be activated. In addition, application of the photocatalytic composition on the sheet material instead of the tile does not affect in any way the acoustic properties of the tile only existing due to presence of the holes.
As has already been said, the composition based on at least one photocatalytic agent is applied on at least one of the material faces.
In a first embodiment, the composition is applied to the surface of the nonwoven material facing the support. In practice, the composition is applied at a rate of 2 to 50 g/m2, advantageously on the order of 4 to 12 g/m2. Application of the layer is particularly carried out by coating, spraying or an equivalent method.
In a second embodiment, the composition is applied to the two faces of the nonwoven material, in particular by impregnation or an equivalent method. In this hypothesis, the photocatalytic composition is applied at a rate of 2 to 100 g/m2, advantageously between 8 and 20 g/m2.
As regards the photocatalytic agent-based composition, this contains, in addition to the photocatalytic agent, at least one binding agent, in particular an inorganic binding agent.
The photocatalytic agent is particularly chosen from the group comprising metallic oxides, alkaline-earth oxides, actinide oxides and rare earth oxides. Advantageously, the photocatalytic agent is titanium dioxide (TiO2), preferably anatase. In practice, the titanium dioxide particles have a diameter of between 10 and 30 nm.
In a preferred embodiment, the TiO2 has a specific surface area greater than 225 m2/g and a particle size on the order of 15 nm. Advantageously, the TiO2 is the TiO2 sold by the Kronos company under the brand KRONOS® VLP 7000.
In a particular embodiment, the photocatalytic composition contains, in addition, adsorbent particles such as, for example, zeolite. The adsorbent particles such as, for example, zeolite represent in practice between 1 and 50% by weight of the photocatalytic composition, advantageously between 5 and 25%.
As regards the inorganic binder, it is advantageously present in the form of an aqueous colloidal dispersion of silicon dioxide comprising silica particles able to be bound to one another after having coated the photocatalytic agent.
More precisely, the phrase “aqueous colloidal dispersion of silicon dioxide SiO2”, refers to a negatively charged dispersion of amorphous silica particles, with a high specific surface area, in water. In practice, the specific surface area of the silica particles is greater than 80 m2/g, advantageously 100 m2/g for a particle size of between 25 and 30 nm. Furthermore, it is greater than 300 m2/g, advantageously 350 m2/g for a particle size of between 4 and 6 nm. On their surface, the silica particles present OH groups and OH− ions, which form a double electric layer, conferring self-bonding properties to said particles.
In an advantageous embodiment, the particles of SiO2 represent from 20 to 50% by weight of the aqueous colloidal dispersion and have a diameter of between 10 and 50 nm, preferably of between 20 and 30 nm.
The Applicant has observed that particularly effective results are obtained with a photocatalytic composition containing from 10 to 60 parts (dry), advantageously 50 dry parts of an aqueous colloidal dispersion of SiO2 containing between 20 and 50% by weight of SiO2 with a size of between 10 and 50 nm, advantageously of between 20 and 30 nm, the complement to 100% being constituted of TiO2 and, if necessary, of adsorbent particles.
In a particular embodiment, the complement to 100% is constituted of 25 to 45 parts of TiO2 and from 5 to 25 parts of adsorbent particles, such as, in particular, zeolite.
If necessary and according to demand, the photocatalytic composition may also contain pigments, particularly black pigments.
According to another characteristic, the perforated support is advantageously a plaster support. It may also, nevertheless, be present in the form of a wooden board, a metal board or a PVC board.
The nonwoven material designates materials comprising artificial and/or synthetic and/or natural fibers. The expression ‘artificial and/or synthetic fibers’ designates fibers chosen from a group comprising, among artificial fibers, viscose fibers, and among synthetic fibers, polyester, polypropylene, polyamide, polyacrylic, polyvinyl alcohol, and polyethylene fibers, alone or in mixture. The expression ‘natural fibers’ designates especially cellulose fibers.
The invention and its resulting advantages will emerge more clearly from the following embodiments, supported by the attached figures.
a and 1b are schematic partial cross sections of two preferred embodiments of the present invention.
a is a schematical partial cross section of an acoustic tile in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention. The acoustic tile 10 of
b is a schematical partial cross section of an acoustic tile in accordance with another preferred embodiment of the present invention. The only exception compared to the acoustic tile of
In this example, the pollution removal efficiency of a tile of the invention, in UV or visible light, is compared to that of an acoustic tile sold by the KNAUF company under the CLEANEO brand and to standard tiles.
The following products are tested:
This figure shows that under UV irradiation, the tile of the invention is the tile that degrades toluene most effectively and that generates the most CO2 by photocatalysis, and that, thanks to the combined action of zeolite, attaches the pollutant near the TiO2, which acts by photocatalysis.
The CLEANEO product also attaches the pollutant thanks to the presence of zeolite. On the other hand, there is no regeneration of zeolite due to the absence of photocatalytic agent. The very low generation of CO2 is probably due to the fact that the plaster boards are not constituted of pure calcium carbonates and that the board produces a carbonation phenomenon with UV contact. This cannot be a photocatalysis phenomenon under any circumstances.
The LAFARGE standard boards/tiles with and without nonwoven material and lacking the photocatalyst agent and zeolite have an insignificant pollution removal activity.
In this experiment, UV radiation was replaced by visible light whose spectrum was between 400 and 700 nm.
As the figure shows, the tile of the invention presents very good pollution removal efficiency still with the same principle, a combination of the adsorbent effect of zeolite with the photocatalyst effect of TiO2.
From all of these results, it may be deduced that the tile of the invention, with or without zeolite, may be used in offices in daylight or artificial light, these two sources comprising both UV (in low proportion) and visible (in high proportion) radiation.
The invention and the resulting advantages clearly emerge from the previous description. In particular, the development of an acoustic board able to ensure removal of pollution from ambient air, particularly in offices, without any saturation of the pollution removal sites, should be noted.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0854997 | Jul 2008 | FR | national |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/FI2009/050632 | 5/17/2009 | WO | 00 | 8/13/2011 |
