The present invention relates to an acoustic wave device and an electronic apparatus including the acoustic wave device.
Dielectric film 104 is made of silicon oxide. The temperature coefficient of frequency (TCF) of silicon oxide has a sign opposite to that of piezoelectric substrate 102, so that dielectric film 104 made of silicon oxide may improve the TCF of acoustic wave device 101. Conventional acoustic wave device 101 may provide electrode fingers 103 with corrosion.
The shapes of electrode fingers 602 and 608 are formed by a lift-off method employing a photolithography technique, or by an etching method employing a micro-process technique. Conventional acoustic wave device 601 may have a small reflectivity.
An acoustic wave device includes a piezoelectric substrate, an IDT electrode including plural electrode fingers disposed above an upper surface of the piezoelectric substrate, a first dielectric film made of oxide disposed above the upper surface of the substrate for covering the electrode fingers, and a second dielectric film made of non-oxide disposed on upper surfaces of the electrode fingers and between the first dielectric film and each of the electrode fingers. The first dielectric film contacts the upper surface of the piezoelectric substrate between electrode fingers out of the plural electrode fingers adjacent to each other.
The acoustic wave device prevents the electrode fingers of the IDT electrode from corrosion.
Acoustic wave device 1 includes piezoelectric substrate 2, IDT electrode 21 including plural electrode fingers 3 disposed on upper surface 2A of piezoelectric substrate 2, dielectric film 4 disposed above upper surface 2A of substrate 2 to cover plural electrode fingers 3, and dielectric film 6 disposed on upper surfaces 3A of plural electrode fingers 3 and between dielectric film 4 and each of electrode fingers 3. Electrode fingers 3 are configured to excite a surface wave, such as Rayleigh wave, as a main acoustic wave. Dielectric film 4 is made of oxide while dielectric film 6 is made of non-oxide. Dielectric film 4 contacts upper surface 2A of piezoelectric substrate 2 at positions between electrode fingers 3 adjacent to each other.
Conventional acoustic wave device 101 shown in
Acoustic wave device 1 includes dielectric film 6 made of non-oxide and disposed on upper surfaces 3A of electrode fingers 3, thereby preventing electrode fingers 3 from being oxidized or corroding due to dielectric film 4 disposed above upper surfaces 3A of electrode fingers 3.
In acoustic wave device 1 in accordance with Embodiment 1, dielectric film 4 contacts piezoelectric substrate 2 at positions between electrode fingers 3 adjacent to each other. This structure prevents variation in frequency of the main acoustic wave caused by dielectric film 6, and prevents the characteristics of acoustic wave device 1 from degrading caused by the frequency variation.
Piezoelectric substrate 2 allows, for instance, a Rayleigh wave to propagate through piezoelectric substrate 2 as the main acoustic wave; however, piezoelectric substrate 2 may allow other acoustic waves, such as a Shear Horizontal (SH) wave or a bulk wave as the main acoustic wave, to propagate through piezoelectric substrate 2. The effect on the frequency variation obtained by dielectric film 4 contacting substrate 2 at the positions between electrode fingers 3 can be produced remarkably in the case that piezoelectric substrate 2 allows the Rayleigh wave to propagate through piezoelectric substrate 2 as the main acoustic wave.
Characteristics of acoustic wave device 1 in accordance with Embodiment 1 will be demonstrated below. A sample of acoustic wave device 1 is prepared. In this sample, piezoelectric substrate 2 is made of a lithium niobate (LiNbO3)-based substrate having cut angles and a propagation direction of the main acoustic wave expressed as an Euler angle) (φ,θ,ψ)=(0°,38°,0°). In this context, angles φ and θ represent the cut angle of piezoelectric substrate 2, and angle ψ represents the propagation direction of the main acoustic wave exited by IDT electrode 21. Electrode fingers 3 of IDT electrode 21 are arranged at pitches P3 each of which is a half of wavelength λ of the main acoustic wave. Pitches P3 of this sample are 2 μm. IDT electrode 21 is made of molybdenum. A distance from a lower surface of electrode finger 3 to upper surface 3A, namely a film thickness of electrode finger 3 is 0.055λ. Dielectric film 4 is made of silicon dioxide (SiO2). A height from upper surface 2A of piezoelectric substrate 2 to an upper surface of dielectric film 4, namely film thickness H4 of dielectric film 4 is 0.3λ. Dielectric film 6 is made of silicon nitride (SiN).
In the case that piezoelectric substrate 2 is a substrate that propagates a Rayleigh wave as the main acoustic wave, piezoelectric substrate 2 is made of a lithium niobate (LiNbO3)-based substrate having cut angles and a propagation direction of the main acoustic wave expressed as an Euler angle (φ,θ,ψ) satisfying: −10°≤φ≤10°, 33°≤θ≤43°, and −10°≤ψ≤10°. Piezoelectric substrate 2 may be a quartz-based substrate having cut angles and a propagation direction of the main acoustic wave expressed as Euler angle (φ,θ,ψ) satisfying: −1°≤φ≤1°, 113°≤θ≤135°, and −5°≤ψ≤5°. Piezoelectric substrate 2 may be a lithium tantalite (LiTaO3)-based substrate having cut angles and a propagation direction of the main acoustic wave expressed as Euler angle (φ,θ,ψ) satisfying −7.5°≥φ≤2.5°, 111°≤θ≤121°, and −2.5°≤ψ≤7.5°.
Piezoelectric substrate 2 may be made of a piezoelectric medium other than the above substrates, such as the quartz-based substrate, the lithium niobate (LiNbO3)-based substrate, or the lithium tantalite (LiTaO3)-based substrate, or a thin film as long as the medium satisfies an Euler angle other than the above Euler angles. In this context, angles φ and θ represent the cut-angles of piezoelectric substrate 2, and angle ψ represents the propagation direction of the main acoustic wave. For instance, piezoelectric substrate 2 may be a lithium niobate substrate that propagates an SH wave or a Love wave and has a rotation Y-cut of −25° to +25°, or a lithium tantalite substrate that propagates an SH wave or a Love wave and has rotation Y-cut of 25° to 50°.
As shown in
A total film thickness of electrode finger 3 expressed by where a total density Db of electrode finger 3 and a density Da of aluminum is preferably not smaller than 0.05λ×Db/Da and not larger than 0.15λ×Db/Da. This condition allows the main acoustic wave to concentrate at the surface of acoustic wave device 1.
Dielectric film 4 is an inorganic insulating film made of oxide, and may be made of any medium allowing a transverse wave to propagate through the medium at a speed lower than a speed of a Rayleigh wave excited by comb-shaped electrode 3. For instance, dielectric film 4 is made of the medium mainly containing silicon dioxide (SiO2). SiO2 has a temperature coefficient of frequency (TCF) having a sign opposite to that of piezoelectric substrate 2. Dielectric film 4 made of SiO2 improves the frequency-temperature characteristics of acoustic wave device 1.
In the case that dielectric film 4 is made of SiO2, the film thickness is determined such that an absolute value of an amount of change in frequency of the main acoustic wave excited by electrode fingers 3 of IDT electrode 21 with respect to a temperature is not larger than a predetermined value (40 ppm/° C.). According to Embodiment 1, the film thickness of dielectric film 4 is a distance from the upper surface of dielectric film 4 to a boundary between upper surface 2A of substrate 2 and dielectric film 4 disposed between finger electrodes 3 adjacent to each other of the IDT electrode. The thickness of dielectric film 4 satisfying the above predetermined value and made of silicon dioxide is not smaller than 0.2λ, and not larger than 0.5λ.
Dielectric film 6 is an inorganic insulating film made of non-oxide. Dielectric film 6 prevents electrode fingers 3 from being oxidized or corroding when dielectric film 4 is formed above electrode fingers 3. Dielectric film 6, namely inorganic insulating film particularly made of nitride, such as silicon nitride, or carbide, such as silicon carbide, produce this effect remarkably. Dielectric film 6 is made of a medium allowing a transverse wave to propagate through the medium at a speed higher than a speed of the main acoustic wave excited by electrode fingers 3 of IDT electrode 21, or is made of a medium allowing a transverse wave to propagate the medium at a speed higher than a speed of a transverse wave propagating through dielectric film 4. The medium can be mainly made of, for instance, diamond, silicon nitride, silicon nitride oxide, aluminum nitride, or aluminum oxide.
A film thickness of portion 156 of dielectric film 56 disposed on upper surface 3A of electrode finger 3 is preferably larger than that of portion 256 disposed on side surface 3C of electrode finger 3. This structure allows dielectric film 56 to protect electrode finger 3 effectively, and to suppress effectively the frequency variation of the main acoustic wave.
A dielectric constant of dielectric film 7 is smaller than that of piezoelectric substrate 2, hence allowing an electromechanical coupling coefficient of acoustic wave device 1E to be adjusted precisely. Acoustic wave device 1E thus can be used in a filter that has a pass bandwidth appropriate for a communication system, such as portable phones. In this case, if piezoelectric substrate 2 is made of a lithium niobate (LiNbO3)-based substrate, a lithium tantalite (LiTaO3)-based substrate, or a potassium niobate (KNbO3)-based substrate, dielectric film 7 is preferably made of dielectric material, such as aluminum oxide (Al2O3), diamond, silicon nitride, silicon nitride oxide, or aluminum nitride.
A speed of a transverse wave propagating through dielectric film 7 (Al2O3) is higher than the speed of an acoustic wave (e.g. main acoustic wave) propagating through piezoelectric substrate 2. This arrangement allows an energy of the acoustic wave propagating through substrate 2 to concentrate at dielectric film 4 (SiO2), and improves the temperature characteristics of a resonator constituted by acoustic wave device 1E.
In
Filter 12 includes resonator 91 and filter 22 both connected between antenna terminal 15 and output terminals 16 as balanced terminals. Filter 12 receives a signal at antenna terminal 15 and outputs the received signal from output terminals 16. Filter 22 is a vertical-mode coupling type filter.
Antenna duplexer 10 further includes phase shifter 23 connected between filters 11 and 12. Phase shifter 23 has low impedance in one of the first pass-band and the second pass-band, and high impedance in another of the first pass-band and the second pass-band, thereby improving isolation between filters 11 and 12.
Acoustic wave device 1 (1C to 1F) in accordance with Embodiment 1 used in filter 11 or 12 prevents corrosion of electrode fingers of the IDT electrode of antenna duplexer 10, and also prevent deterioration of characteristics of antenna duplexer 10 caused by a frequency variation of main acoustic waves in filters 11 and 12.
Acoustic wave device 1 (1C to 1F) in accordance with Embodiment 1 used in electronic apparatus 50 improves communication quality of apparatus 50.
Acoustic wave device 201 further includes dielectric film 207 disposed between piezoelectric substrate 2 and each of plural electrode fingers 3. To be more specific, dielectric film 207 is disposed on upper surface 2A of piezoelectric substrate 2 while plural electrode fingers 3 are disposed on upper surface 207A of dielectric film 207. Dielectric film 207 is made of medium allowing a transverse wave to propagate through the medium at a speed higher than that of a main acoustic wave propagating through piezoelectric substrate 2. This structure allows an electromechanical coefficient of acoustic wave device 201 to be adjusted precisely while reducing a loss caused by dielectric film 207, hence providing a filter having a pass bandwidth appropriate for a communication system, such as portable phones.
Dielectric film 4 adjoins upper surface 207A of dielectric film 207 at positions between electrode fingers 3 adjacent to each other.
In acoustic wave device 201, dielectric film 6 made of non-oxide prevents corrosion or oxidation of electrode fingers 3, similarly to acoustic wave device 1 according to Embodiment 1.
In acoustic wave device 201, dielectric film 4 disposed between electrode fingers 3 adjacent to each other contacts upper surface 207A of dielectric film 207. This structure suppresses the frequency variation, caused by the presence of dielectric film 6, in the main acoustic wave, thus preventing deterioration of characteristics caused by this frequency variation of acoustic wave device 201.
Piezoelectric substrate 2 allows a Rayleigh wave to propagate through piezoelectric substrate 2 as the main acoustic wave; however, piezoelectric substrate 2 can be a piezoelectric substrate allowing another acoustic wave, such as a Shear Horizontal (SH) wave or a bulk wave, to propagate as the main acoustic wave. The frequency variation of the main acoustic wave can be remarkably reduced by the structure in which dielectric film 4 contacts dielectric film 207 at positions between electrode fingers 3 particularly in the case that piezoelectric substrate 2 allows a Rayleigh wave to propagate through piezoelectric substrate 2 as the main acoustic wave.
Dielectric film 207 is made of medium allowing a transverse wave propagates at a speed higher than that of the main acoustic wave propagating through piezoelectric substrate 2. This structure allows an electromechanical coefficient of acoustic wave device 201 to be adjusted precisely while reducing a loss caused by dielectric film 207, thus providing a filter having a pass bandwidth appropriate for a communication system, such as portable phones. In the case that piezoelectric substrate 2 is made of a quartz-based substrate, a lithium niobate (LiNbO3)-based substrate, a lithium tantalite (LiTaO3)-based substrate, or a potassium niobate (KNbO3)-based substrate, dielectric film 207 is preferably made of dielectric material, such as aluminum oxide (Al2O3), diamond, silicon nitride, silicon nitride oxide, aluminum nitride, or titanium nitride.
Dielectric film 207 may be made of medium having a dielectric constant smaller than that of piezoelectric substrate 2, thereby allowing an electromechanical coupling coefficient of acoustic wave device 201 to be adjusted precisely. Acoustic wave device 201 thus can be used in a filter that has a pass bandwidth appropriate for a communication system, such as portable phones. In the case that piezoelectric substrate 2 is made of a lithium niobate (LiNbO3)-based substrate, a lithium tantalite (LiTaO3)-based substrate, or a potassium niobate (KNbO3)-based substrate, dielectric film 207 is preferably made of dielectric material, such as aluminum oxide (Al2O3), diamond, silicon nitride, silicon nitride oxide, or aluminum nitride.
Acoustic wave device 201 in accordance with Embodiment 2 prevents deterioration of characteristics caused by the frequency variation comparing to Comparison Example 2, acoustic wave device 60.
A film thickness of portion 156 of dielectric film 56 disposed on upper surface 3A of electrode finger 3 is preferably larger than that of portion 256 disposed on side surface 3C of electrode finger 3. This structure allows dielectric film 56 to protect electrode finger 3 more effectively and yet, to prevent electrode fingers 3 from being oxidized as well as to prevent effectively the frequency variation of the main acoustic wave.
Acoustic wave devices 70, 80, and 201 in accordance with Embodiment 2 may be employed in antenna duplexer 10 and electronic apparatus 50 shown in
Each of electrode fingers 302 includes electrode layer 308 disposed on upper surface 303A of substrate 303 and electrode layer 307 disposed on upper surface 308A of electrode layer 308. Electrode layer 308 has lower surface 308B facing upper surface 303A of piezoelectric substrate 303, and has side surface 308C connected to upper surface 308A and lower surface 308B. Electrode layer 307 has lower surface 307B facing upper surface 308A of electrode layer 308, upper surface 307A opposite to lower surface 307B, and side surface 307C connected to upper surface 307A and lower surface 307B. Angle θ1 formed by side surface 307C and plane 309 parallel to upper surface 303A of substrate 303 inside electrode layer 307 is an acute angle. In other words, side surface 307C faces upward. Angle θ1 of electrode layer 307 is larger than angle θ2 that is the largest angle among angles formed by upper surface 305A of projection 305 and plane 310 parallel to upper surface 303A of substrate 303.
Angle θ1 being an acute angle decreases projection 305 formed on dielectric film 304. Small projection 305 decreases angle θ2, and consequently, allows angle θ1 to be larger than angle θ2. Angle θ1 of electrode layer 307 is preferably close to 90 degrees to increase a reflectivity. Angle θ1 is thus preferably larger than angle θ2.
The above structure does not excessively decrease angle θ1 and thus, provides a certain reflectivity of the acoustic wave. This structure decreases projections 305 formed on upper surface 304A of dielectric film 304, and prevents the reflectivity from decreasing. As a result, the reflectivity of acoustic wave device 301 can be greater.
In acoustic wave device 301 having a Rayleigh wave propagating through as a main acoustic wave, projections 305 scatter the acoustic wave, thereby reducing a reflectivity and increasing an insertion loss. Smaller projections 305 improve the reflectivity.
Piezoelectric substrate 303 may be made of lithium niobate, lithium tantalite, lithium tetraborate, or quartz. Piezoelectric substrate 303 of acoustic wave device 301 having a Rayleigh wave propagating as the main acoustic wave is preferably made of a rotation Y-cut X-propagation substrate having an Euler angle (φ,θ,ψ) satisfying −5°≤φ≤5°, −5°≤θ≤5°, and −5°≤ψ≤5°.
A cross section of upper surface 305A of projection 305 perpendicular to extension direction 302P is downward convex. This shape can be formed by laminating dielectric films 304 by a biased-sputtering method.
The downward convex shape of upper surface 305A of projection 305 reduces a volume of projection 305, and prevents the reflectivity of acoustic wave device 301 from decreasing. In the case that the cross section of upper surface 305A of projection 305 is downward convex, the largest angle θ2 among angles formed by upper surface 305A and plane 310 parallel with upper surface 303A of piezoelectric substrate 303 is located at top 305B. In this case, angle θ1 is larger than angle θ2 in acoustic wave device 301.
Projection 305 has a small volume, and angle θ1 is larger than angle θ2 at top 305B, hence providing electrode layer 307 with a large volume. This structure allows electrode fingers 302 to provide a certain reflectivity of the acoustic wave since angle θ1 is not excessively small. This structure prevents positively the reflectivity from lowering since projection 305 on upper surface 304A of dielectric film 304 is small.
In electrode layer 308 disposed between electrode layer 307 and piezoelectric substrate 303, side surface 308C of electrode layer 308 and plane 311 parallel with upper surface 303A of substrate 303 form angle θ3 larger than angle θ1. Angle θ3 preferably ranges from 85° to 95°, and more preferably, is 90°. In other words, side surface 308C of electrode layer 308 may preferably be substantially perpendicular to upper surface 303A of piezoelectric substrate 303.
A ladder filter or a Double Mode Saw (DMS) filter that includes acoustic wave device 301 requires a relatively large reflectivity of the acoustic wave for each electrode finger 302 in order to obtain preferable filter characteristics. A small reflectivity of each electrode finger 302 may increase an insertion loss in the pass-band of the filter, or may produce ripples having the characteristics deteriorate. A desirable reflectivity per one electrode finger 302 is determined by the desirable pass-band width of the filter. Reflectivity γ per one electrode finger 302 and stop-bandwidth SBW of the filter is expressed as formula 1 with a center frequency f0 of the reflection characteristics.
If stop-bandwidth SBW is narrower than the pass-bandwidth of the filter, acoustic wave device 301 cannot confine the acoustic wave completely therein at frequencies in the pass-band, and produces a leakage of the acoustic wave, thereby having the pass-band characteristics deteriorate. Angle θ3 of electrode layer 308 ranging from 85° to 95° provides large reflectivity γ. Since this reflectivity γ has a linear relation as shown in formula 1 with respect to stop-bandwidth SBW, large reflectivity γ reduces the insertion loss as well as prevents characteristics from deteriorating due to ripples.
The range of angle θ3 from 85° to 95° is a range that does not decrease reflectivity γ of the acoustic wave in acoustic wave device 301. The shape of the side surfaces (307C, 308C) of electrode finger 302 can be formed by controlling the manufacturing process.
On the cross section of electrode finger 302 perpendicular to extension direction 302P, width L1 of lower surface 307B of electrode layer 307 in propagation direction 302Q of the main acoustic wave is smaller than width L2 of upper surface 308A of electrode layer 308 in propagation direction 302Q. On a cross section of electrode finger 302 perpendicular to extension direction 302P, this structure reduces a width of upper surface 307A of electrode layer 307 in propagation direction 302Q. As a result, this structure further decreases projection 305 formed on upper surface 304A of dielectric film 304, thereby preventing more positively the reflectivity γ from decreasing.
Electrode fingers 302 are made of single metal, alloy or a laminated structure. Electrode layer 308 is made of material having an average density larger than that of electrode layer 307. Electrode layer 307 is made of metal having a small resistivity to reduce a resistance loss caused by electrode layer 307. Electrode layer 308 is preferably made mainly of molybdenum (Mo) or tungsten (W). Electrode layer 307 is mainly made of aluminum (Al) or copper (Cu). A preferable height range of electrode layer 307 or 308 changes depending on the metal materials used for these layers. For instance, in the case of a filter having a center frequency of 897 MHz corresponding to a transmission filter for Band 8 specified by the Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS), for wavelength λ (=4.0 μm) of an acoustic wave determined by pitches P302 of electrode fingers 302, the preferable height of electrode layer 308 ranges from 170 nm to 230 nm, and more preferably, the height is about 200 nm if electrode layer 308 is mainly made of Mo. If electrode layer 308 is mainly made of W, the preferable height of electrode layer 308 ranges from 60 nm to 120 nm, and more preferably, the height is about 90 nm. If electrode layer 307 is mainly made of Al, the preferable height of electrode layer 307 ranges from 250 nm to 350 nm, and more preferably, the height is about 320 nm. Electrode layer 307 is thus preferably thicker than electrode layer 308. Electrode layer 307 out of electrode layers 307 and 308 having a density smaller than that of electrode layer 308 has a volume larger than that of electrode layer 308. This structure reduces a resistance of electrode fingers 302, and reducing a resistance loss accordingly.
Dielectric film 304 may be made of silicon nitride (SiN), aluminum nitride (AlN), tantalum pentoxide (Ta2O5), tellurium oxide (TeO2, TeO3), or silicon dioxide (SiO2). Dielectric material, such as SiO2, having a temperature coefficient of frequency (TCF) has a sign opposite to that of piezoelectric substrate 303 is preferably used for dielectric film 304, thereby improving the TCF of acoustic wave device 301.
A method for manufacturing acoustic wave device 301 will be detailed below. In this description, electrode layer 307 is made of Al, and electrode layer 308 is made of Mo.
First, piezoelectric substrate 303 made of mono-crystal lithium niobate of rotary Y-cut and X propagation is prepared, as shown in
Then, as shown in
Next, as shown in
Then, as shown in
The amount of the residue depends on a bias electric power during the dry etching. The larger the bias electric power is, the larger the amount of the residue is, so that the masking effect can be increased. As a result, electrode layer 307 has a large width in propagation direction 302Q of the main acoustic wave, thus being thick. The bias electric power is controlled to adjust the amount of etching electrode layer 307, thereby controlling angle θ1 of electrode layer 307 made of Al.
Next, as shown in
Angle θ1 of electrode layer 307 which is an acute angle reduces the height of projections 305 formed above electrode fingers 302 during the lamination of dielectric film 304. Since the width of lower surface 307B of electrode layer 307 in propagation direction 302Q of the main acoustic wave is smaller than that of upper surface 308A of electrode layer 308 in the direction 302Q, the height of projections 305 formed above electrode fingers 302 during the lamination of dielectric film 304 can be reduced.
Conventional acoustic wave device 601 shown in
In acoustic wave device 301 in accordance with Embodiment 3, projections 305 produced when dielectric film 304 is formed, scatters the acoustic wave. A higher projection 305 may reduce the reflectivity, and increase the insertion loss due to the scattering of the acoustic wave in the acoustic wave device allowing the Rayleigh wave to propagate as the main acoustic wave.
In ordinary manufacturing processes, since a section having the IDT electrode therein has a height different from a height of a section having no IDT electrode therein, the dielectric film formed on the IDT electrode produces projections on the upper surface of the dielectric film above the electrode fingers. It is necessary to grind these projections to prevent the characteristics of the acoustic wave device from deteriorating.
Acoustic wave device 301 in accordance with Embodiment 3 decreases the heights of projections 305 formed above electrode fingers 302, thereby preventing the acoustic wave from scattering. Even if the process of grinding projections 305 is omitted, the reflectivity and the insertion loss of acoustic wave device 301 can be improved. As a result, the cost of acoustic wave device 301 can be reduced. Meanwhile, to further improve the characteristics of device 301, projections 305 may be ground to have smaller sizes.
Stop-bandwidth SBW is found as 68.2 MH, 68.6 MHz, and 71.4 MHz corresponding to heights H305 of 289 nm, 277 nm, and 206 nm, respectively. Therefore, the lower height H305 of projection 305 is, the larger stop-bandwidth SBW of acoustic wave device 301 is. Normalized heights H305/λ obtained by dividing heights H305 of projection 305 by wavelength X are 0.072, 0.069, and 0.052. Stop-bandwidth SBW/fs normalized by respective resonance frequencies fs (893 MHz, 891 MHz, and 890 MHz) are 0.0764, 0.0770, and 0.0801. Normalized height H305/λ normalized by wavelength λ, and normalized stop-bandwidth SBW/fs normalized by resonance frequencies fs do not depend on wavelength λ and resonance frequency fs, respectively, so that the filter is not necessarily limited to a particular filter.
In acoustic wave device 301 used as the filter working for lower frequencies of antenna duplexer 323, the normalized height H305/λ of projection 305 preferably satisfies formula 3 with a relative bandwidth w obtained by dividing the bandwidth by the center frequency.
For instance, when antenna duplexer 323 is used as an antenna duplexer for Band 8, the pass-band frequency of filter 326 ranges from 880 MHz to 915 MHz, and center frequency is 897.5 MHz, thus providing the relative bandwidth w of 0.0390. The normalized stop-bandwidth is thus preferably not smaller than 0.0780. The normalized height H305/λ of projection 305 preferably ranges from 0 to 0.0637. Height H302 of electrode finger 302 is 520 nm and is normalized similarly to height H305. Normalized height H302/λ normalized by wavelength X is 0.13. Height H305 of projection 305 is thus preferably larger than 0% and not larger than 49.0% of height H302 of electrode finger 302.
If an acoustic wave device that does not satisfy formula 3 is used as a filter working on the lower frequencies of the antenna duplexer, the ripples of the series arm resonators overlap the pass-band of the higher frequencies, hence causing the passing characteristics of the antenna duplexer to deteriorate. Acoustic wave device 301 in accordance with Embodiment 3 satisfying formula 3 prevents the passing characteristics on the higher frequencies of antenna duplexer 323 from deteriorating.
Acoustic wave device 301 can be used in a ladder type filter in which the stop-bandwidth of the parallel resonator influences the passing characteristics of the filter. Wavelength λ of the main acoustic wave of the parallel resonator is about 4.2 μm. In the ladder filter, a stop-bandwidth is preferably not narrower than 1.5 times of the pass bandwidth. The normalized height H305/λ of acoustic wave device 301 preferably satisfies formula 4 with respect to relative bandwidth w.
If an acoustic wave device that does not satisfy formula 4 is used in the ladder filter, the ripples of the parallel resonators overlap the pass-band of the filter, hence causing the passing characteristics of the filter to deteriorate. Acoustic wave device 301 in accordance with Embodiment 3 satisfying formula 4 prevents the passing characteristics of the ladder filter from degrading.
The height of projection 305 of acoustic wave device 301 is determined based on particular relative bandwidth w to widen the stop-bandwidth and to improve the characteristics of acoustic wave device 301.
In the case that electrode 372 includes plural electrode layers, namely, electrode layers 307 and 398A to 398C, electrode layer 307 is preferably disposed on the top of these layers. This structure allows electrode finger 372 to be tapered in propagation direction 302Q of the main acoustic wave on an upper surface of the cross section perpendicular to extension direction 302P in which electrode finger 372 extends while electrode finger 372 maintains its volume. As a result, the size of projection 305 formed on dielectric film 304 can be further reduced. This structure thus maintains the reflectivity of the acoustic wave excited by electrode finger 372, and yet, the size of projection 305 formed on the upper surface of dielectric film 304 can be reduced, thereby preventing more positively the reflectivity from decreasing.
Acoustic wave device 301 in accordance with Embodiment 3 can be employed in antenna duplexer 10 or electronic apparatus 50 shown in
In Embodiments 1 to 3, terms, such as “upper surface”, “lower surface”, “above”, and “below”, indicating directions indicate relative directions defined only by relative positional relations of structural elements, such as the piezoelectric substrate, the IDT electrode, and the dielectric film, of the acoustic wave devices, and do not indicate absolute directions, such as a vertical direction.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2013-027414 | Feb 2013 | JP | national |
2013-047493 | Mar 2013 | JP | national |
2013-187919 | Sep 2013 | JP | national |
This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §120 as a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/176,149 titled “ACOUSTIC WAVE DEVICE AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUS INCLUDING SAME,” filed Feb. 10, 2014. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/176,149 claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §119 to Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-027414, filed Feb. 15, 2013, Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-047493, filed Mar. 11, 2013, and to Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-187919, filed Sep. 11, 2013. The content of each of these applications is incorporated herein in its entirety for all purposes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
7939989 | Solal et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
8531255 | Loseu | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8698578 | Nakanishi et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
20040070313 | Furukawa et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20070096592 | Kadota et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20120104897 | Nishiyama et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20130335170 | Ikuta et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140232239 | Iwasaki | Aug 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
S51-3183 | Jan 1976 | JP |
S52-9389 | Jan 1977 | JP |
H10145171 | May 1998 | JP |
2000502236 | Feb 2000 | JP |
2008067289 | Mar 2008 | JP |
2008109413 | May 2008 | JP |
2011135245 | Jul 2011 | JP |
2013201468 | Oct 2013 | JP |
2003058813 | Jul 2003 | WO |
2005034347 | Apr 2005 | WO |
2012098816 | Jul 2012 | WO |
2012102131 | Aug 2012 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170040969 A1 | Feb 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14176149 | Feb 2014 | US |
Child | 15332279 | US |