The present invention relates to flooring systems designed to reduce airborne and impact sound transmission, and more specifically relates to an improved flooring system which improves acoustical isolation while having a relatively space-conserving profile to enhance compliance with existing building design parameters. Conventional flooring systems include a subfloor of poured concrete or plywood. Various underlayments located between the subfloor and the finished floor (typically ceramic tile, vinyl tile or hardwood) have been used to reduce sound transmission.
Sound rated or floating floor systems are known in the prior art for acoustically isolating a room beneath a floor on which impacts may occur, such as pedestrian footfalls, sports activities, dropping of toys, or scraping caused by moving furniture. Impact noise generation can generally be reduced by using thick carpeting, but where concrete, ceramic tile, sheet vinyl, or hardwood finishes are to be used a sound rated floor may be particularly desirable. The transmission of impact noise to the area below can be reduced by resiliently supporting the floor away from the floor substructure, which typically transmits the noise into the area below. If the floor surface receiving the impact is isolated from the substructure, then the impact sound transmission will be greatly reduced. Likewise, if the ceiling below is isolated from the substructure, the impact sound will be restricted from traveling into the area below.
Sound rated floors are typically evaluated by ASTM Standard #492 and are rated as to impact insulation class (IIC). The greater the IIC rating, the less impact noise will be transmitted to the area below. Floors may also be rated as to Sound Transmission Class (STC) per ASTM E90. The greater the STC rating, the less airborne sound will be transmitted to the area below. Sound rated floors typically are specified to have an IIC rating of not less than 50 and an STC rating of not less than 50. Even though an IIC rating of 50 meets many building codes, experience has shown that in luxury condominium applications even floor-ceiling systems having an IIC of rating 56-57 may not be acceptable because some impact noise is still audible.
In addition to having an adequate STC and IIC rating, an acceptable sound rated floor must also have a relatively low profile. Low profile is important to maintain minimum transition height between a finished sound rated floor and adjacent areas, such as carpeted floors, which ordinarily do not need the sound rated construction. Low profile is also important for maintaining door threshold and ceiling height dimensions, restraining construction costs, and maintaining other architectural parameters.
Also, a sound rated floor must exhibit enough vertical stiffness to reduce cracking, creaking, and deflection of the finished covering. At the same time, the sound rated floor must be resilient enough to isolate the impact noise from the area to be protected below. Thus, designers of acoustic flooring must strike a balance between vibration dampening and structural integrity of the floor.
Two isolation media currently used and also approved by the Ceramic Tile Institute for sound rated tile floors are (i) 0.4 inch ENKASONIC® brand matting (nylon and carbon black spinerette extruded 630 g/sq. meter) manufactured by Colbond Inc. of Enka, N.C. and (ii) 0.25 inch Dow ETHAFOAM™ (polyethylene foam 2.7 pcf) manufactured by Dow Chemical Co., Midland Mich. While both of these systems are statically relatively soft and provide some degree of resiliency for impact insulation, the added effect of air stiffness in the 0.25 and 0.40 inch thick media makes the system very stiff dynamically and limits the amount of impact insulation. Because the systems are statically soft, they do not provide a high degree of support for the finished floor, and a relatively thick ( 7/16 inch) glass mesh mortar board, such as a product called Wonderboard, is used on top of the media to provide rigidity for preventing grout, tiles, and other finished flooring from cracking. Alternatively, a relatively thick (1¼ inch) reinforced mortar bed must be installed on top of the resilient mat.
Another known isolation system includes the installation of pads or mounts placed on a subfloor, wooden sleepers are then laid over the isolation pads or mounts, and a plywood deck is fastened to the sleepers to form a secondary subfloor. Often, glass fiber insulation is placed in the cavity defined between the sleepers. A poured or sheet-type underlayment material is then applied to the secondary subfloor. While acoustically effective in reducing sound transmissions, this system adds as much as 6 inches to the thickness of a floor. This thickness is undesirable in most commercial and multi-family residential buildings.
Other known acoustic flooring materials include a poured settable underlayment sold under the mark LEVELROCK™ by United States Gypsum Company of Chicago, Ill. (USG). LEVELROCK underlayment is a mixture of Plaster of Paris, Portland Cement and Crystalline Silica. LEVELROCK underlayments have been used with sound reduction mats (SRM) located between the underlayment and the subfloor. Such mats are made of polymeric material and are typically a matrix of hollow cylindrical shapes held together by a thin mesh. Another material used to dampen sound transmission is Sound Reduction Board (SRB) sold by USG of Chicago, Ill., also under the mark LEVELROCK™. SRB is a mixture of man-made vitreous fiber and minerals, including slag wool fiber, expanded Perlite, starch, cellulose, Kaolin and crystalline silica.
However, known acoustic flooring systems have been unable to consistently achieve IIC values greater than 50 and in the desired range of 55-60. Accordingly, there is a need for an improved sound reduction flooring which addresses the above-identified design parameters.
The above-listed objects are met or exceeded by the present acoustical isolation floor underlayment system, which features enhanced sound reduction properties, maintenance of acceptable floor structural integrity and maintains a relatively low profile. One of the ways in which these goals are achieved is by providing a composite underlayment of a plurality of layers of materials, each layer having discontinuous acoustic properties, which reduce the amount of sound energy transmitted between the layers, and ultimately, through the floor. In addition, the arrangement and selection of the materials distributes impact loading to dissipate compression of relatively resilient materials.
More specifically, the present invention provides an acoustic isolation medium configured for placement between a subfloor and a finished floor with a poured underlayment, includes a first layer being a sound reduction mat disposed upon the subfloor, a second layer placed upon the first layer and being one of a sheet of fibrous material and a web of high-density limp mass material with a high internal damping coefficient, and a third layer placed upon the second layer and being the other of a sheet of the fibrous material and a web of the high-density limp mass material.
In another embodiment, an acoustic flooring isolation underlayment system is configured for placement between a subfloor and a finished floor, and includes a first layer being a sound reduction mat disposed upon the subfloor. A second layer is placed upon the first layer, being made of a material discontinuous from the first layer, being homogeneous and providing cushioning and sound absorption. A third layer is placed upon the second layer, being made of a material which is discontinuous from the second layer, is homogeneous and is compression resistant.
Referring now to
The present flooring system 10 includes an acoustical isolation floor underlayment, generally designated 14 which is disposed between the subfloor 12 and a finished floor 16 which is typically ceramic tile, vinyl tile, hardwood or other hard materials other than carpeting. An adhesive layer 17 such as mortar, mastic or chemical adhesive secures the finished floor 16 to the underlayment 14.
A first layer 18 which is disposed upon the subfloor 12 is a sound reduction mat (SRM) made of a polymeric material and configured as a plurality of open hollow, cylinders 20 disposed in an array of spaced, preferably parallel rows with lower ends 22 facing the subfloor 12. The cylinders 20 are held together at opposite ends 24 by a polymeric lattice 26. Three functions are served by the SRM layer 18: it provides a water or vapor barrier, the cylinders 20 cushion the floor system 10 and absorb impact forces, and it provides one level of discontinuity of material and substantially reduced contact area, which is an important factor in reducing sound transmissions through the flooring system 10.
A preferred SRM is sold by USG under LEVELROCK™ SRM-25 sound reduction mat, having a polyethylene core forming the cylinders 22 and a polypropylene fabric forming the lattice 26. The lattice 26 also preferably has a textured upper surface 27 as shown fragmentarily in
A second layer of the acoustical isolation underlayment 14 is generally designated 28 and is preferably a sheet of fibrous material of homogeneous thickness and construction. In the present application, “homogeneous” shall refer to the sheet having a substantially uniform height or thickness, and being substantially uniform across its area to provide consistent shock and sound absorption. Preferably, the second layer 28 is a sheet of fiberglass having a height or thickness of approximately ¼ inch and a density of approximately 3 pounds per cubic foot (pcf) (48.06 kg/cu.m). The second layer 28 is loosely disposed above the SRM 18, preferably without adhesive or other fasteners. Another important feature of the second layer 28 is that it is discontinuous with the SRM 18. As such, sound energy being transmitted through the floor system 10 is dampened and/or dissipated as it progresses through the layers 18, 28.
A third layer of the acoustical isolation underlayment 14 is generally designated 30 and is preferably a high-density limp mass material with a high internal damping coefficient. In the present application, “high density” refers to densities in the preferred range of 22-72 pcf; however densities beginning at 10 pcf and exceeding 72 pcf are contemplated as being suitable. For the purposes of the present application, “high internal damping coefficient” refers to a coefficient of 0.01 or greater at 1000 Hz. Such material is discontinuous with the second layer 28. In addition, the material used in the layer 30 prevents compression of the fibrous second layer 28.
Preferably, the third layer 30 is provided as sheets of Sound Reduction Board having a composition of at least 30% by weight slag wool fiber; no more than 40% by weight expanded Perlite, less than 15% by weight starch, at least 5% by weight cellulose and, less than 10% by weight Kaolin and less than 5% by weight crystalline silica. The ingredients are mixed, formed into slurry, formed into sheets and dried. A suitable type of such SRB is sold by USG under the LEVELROCK™ SRB brand, however equivalent types of SRB are commercially available. The SRB 30 is preferably laid upon the second layer 28 without adhesive or fasteners.
Referring now to
Referring now to
As is the case with the SRB board, the DUROCK® brand cementitious board is preferably disposed above the fibrous layer 28, but it is also contemplated that the fibrous layer is located above the third layer 30′. It will also be understood that the DUROCK® brand cementitious board, when used as the third layer 30′, is acoustically discontinuous with the fibrous layer 28 and the SRM layer 18, as is the SRB.
In situations where the DUROCK® brand cement board is unsuitable, it is also contemplated that the third layer 30, 30′ may be provided in the form of a poured, settable high-density limp mass material having a high internal damping coefficient, such as DUROCK® brand formulation supplied by USG. An alternative material to DUROCK® material is FIBEROCK® brand aquatough fiber reinforced sheathing panels manufactured by USG.
To address the low profile requirement discussed above, it is preferred that the combined assembled height or thickness “T” of the layers 18, 28 and 30 or 30′ (
Once the acoustic isolation underlayment 14 is assembled upon the subfloor 12, in the preferred embodiment a poured layer of settable underlayment 32 is applied to an upper surface 34 of the third layer 30. In the preferred embodiment, the poured underlayment 32 is USG LEVELROCK™ floor underlayment 2500, having a composition of at least 85% by weight Plaster of Paris (CaSO4½H2O), less than 10% by weight Portland Cement and less than 5% by weight crystalline silica. Upon setting of the underlayment 32, the finished floor 16 is applied as is well known in the art. In practice, due to the tendency of the settable underlayment to migrate into the fibrous layer 28, the underlayment 14 is considered preferable in many applications to that of the underlayment 14a.
In the present preferred application, regarding the underlayment 14, the IIC values were determined using a full scale test per ASTM E497 and were found to meet or exceed stated requirements of 55-60 IIC.
In either formulation, having the highly damped limp mass material adjacent to the rigid dense underlayment helps to dampen the initial acoustical vibration and thus improves the overall performance of the floor system.
Referring now to
Thus, it will be seen that the present acoustical isolation underlayment system addresses the needs identified above, and provides a low profile system featuring several thin layers of discontinuous materials for absorbing sound energy between floors. Also, the structural integrity of the floor is maintained while also providing shock absorbing characteristics.
While particular embodiments of the present acoustical isolation floor underlayment system have been described herein, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that changes and modifications may be made thereto without departing from the invention in its broader aspects and as set forth in the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2174581 | Hoge | Oct 1939 | A |
3095943 | Kemp | Jul 1963 | A |
3166149 | Hulse et al. | Jan 1965 | A |
3229785 | Pottash | Jan 1966 | A |
3666606 | Stokes | May 1972 | A |
3712846 | Daniels et al. | Jan 1973 | A |
3770560 | Elder et al. | Nov 1973 | A |
4084367 | Saylor et al. | Apr 1978 | A |
4130175 | Hehmann | Dec 1978 | A |
4205110 | Jean | May 1980 | A |
4235303 | Dhoore et al. | Nov 1980 | A |
4294329 | Rose et al. | Oct 1981 | A |
4313524 | Rose | Feb 1982 | A |
4318453 | Rose et al. | Mar 1982 | A |
4340129 | Salyers | Jul 1982 | A |
4379191 | Beggs et al. | Apr 1983 | A |
4384020 | Beggs et al. | May 1983 | A |
4418108 | Lin | Nov 1983 | A |
4421811 | Rose et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4433021 | Riel | Feb 1984 | A |
4504346 | Newsam | Mar 1985 | A |
4522863 | Keck et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4539244 | Beggs et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
4541879 | Riel | Sep 1985 | A |
4671841 | Stephens | Jun 1987 | A |
4681786 | Brown | Jul 1987 | A |
4685259 | Eberhart et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4698249 | Brown | Oct 1987 | A |
4741945 | Brant et al. | May 1988 | A |
4849276 | Bendig et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4909003 | Hennigan | Mar 1990 | A |
4990391 | Veta et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5068001 | Haussling | Nov 1991 | A |
5106668 | Turner et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5172527 | Ault | Dec 1992 | A |
5187905 | Pourtau et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5205091 | Brown | Apr 1993 | A |
5414232 | Wilson | May 1995 | A |
5445861 | Newton et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5501895 | Finley et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5543198 | Wilson | Aug 1996 | A |
5578363 | Finley et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5584950 | Gaffigan | Dec 1996 | A |
5632844 | Pate et al. | May 1997 | A |
5867957 | Holtrop | Feb 1999 | A |
5968630 | Foster | Oct 1999 | A |
6065717 | Boock | May 2000 | A |
6077613 | Gaffigan | Jun 2000 | A |
6167668 | Fine et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6176964 | Parente et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6179086 | Bansemir et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6179371 | Miller | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6319579 | Strandgaard | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6369120 | Chaudhary et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6371242 | Wilson et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6435784 | De Mattia et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6440521 | Moore | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6569509 | Alts | May 2003 | B1 |
6576577 | Garner | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6599599 | Buckwater et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6620487 | Tonyan et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6676199 | Buisson et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6830796 | Murray et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6986229 | Collison et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7226656 | Coates et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7311957 | Bargo, II | Dec 2007 | B2 |
20030219582 | Ramesh et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20050089678 | Mead | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20070000198 | Payne et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070289238 A1 | Dec 2007 | US |