This application is related to commonly assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/658,814 filed Sep. 8, 2003, by Kevin J. Surace and Marc U. Porat, entitled “Accoustical Sound Proofing Material and Methods for Manufacturing Same” which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
This invention relates to acoustical damping materials and, in particular, to soundproofing materials of a novel laminar construction which significantly improves the soundproofing ability of walls, ceilings, floors, and doors, thereby to prevent the transmission of sounds from one area to another.
Noise is emerging as both an economic and public policy issue. Soundproof rooms are required for a variety of purposes. For example, apartments, hotels and schools all require rooms with walls, ceilings and floors that minimize the transmission of sound thereby to avoid annoying people in adjacent rooms. Soundproofing is particularly important in buildings adjacent to public transportation, such as highways, airports and railroad lines, as well as in theaters, home theaters, music practice rooms, recording studios and others. One measure of the severity of the problem is the widespread emergence of city building ordinances that specify a minimum Sound Transmission Class (“STC”) rating. Another measure is the broad emergence of litigation between homeowners and builders over the issue of unacceptable noise. To the detriment of the U.S. economy, both problems have resulted in major builders refusing to build homes, condos and apartments in certain municipalities; and in widespread cancellation of liability insurance for builders.
In the past, walls typically were made up of studs with drywall on both exterior surfaces of the studs and baffles or plates commonly placed between the studs in an attempt to reduce the transmission of sound from one room to the next. Unfortunately, even the best of such walls using standard drywall are capable of only reducing sound transmission by approximately 30 db, and much of that is focused on mid-range and high frequencies rather than lower frequencies which cause most of the complaints and litigation.
Various techniques and products have emerged to abate this problem, such as: replacement of wooden studs by steel studs; resilient channels to offset and isolate drywall panels from studs; mass-loaded vinyl barriers; cellulose sound boards; cellulose and fiberglass batt insulation; and techniques such as staggered-beam and double-beam construction. All help reduce the transmission of noise, but, again, not to such an extent that certain sounds (e.g., lower frequencies, high decibel) in a given room are prevented from being transmitted to an adjacent room, including rooms above or below. A brief review of commercially available products shows that there has been little innovation in these techniques and technologies for many years.
Accordingly, what is needed is a new material and a new method of construction to reduce the transmission of sound from a given room to an adjacent room.
In accordance with this invention a new laminar structure and associated manufacturing process is provided which significantly improves the ability of a wall, ceiling, floor or door to reduce the transmission of sound from one room to an adjacent room, or from the exterior to the interior of a room, or from the interior to the exterior of a room.
The new laminar structure comprises a lamination of several different materials. In accordance with one embodiment, a laminar substitute for plywood comprises a sandwich of two outer layers of selected thickness of a cellulose material or wood which are glued each to an interior constraining layer, such as a metal, cellulose (e.g., wood) or a petroleum-based product such as vinyl, composite plastic or rubber, using a sound absorbent adhesive. In one embodiment, the constraining layer comprises a selected thickness galvanized steel and the glue layer is a specially formulated QuietGlue of a specific thickness which is a viscoelastic material. Formed on the interior surfaces of the two cellulose layers, the glue layers are each about 1/16 inch thick and the galvanized steel between 0.005 and 0.5 inch thick.
In one embodiment, the galvanized steel metal layer is preferably not oiled and of regular spackle. The resulting product, even though it contains the galvanized steel center sheet, can be cut with a standard hand saw using wood blades.
The laminated sheets of this invention use unique glues capable of substantially absorbing sound and vibration together with one or more constraining layers which reduce the transmissibility of the sound from one layer to the adjacent layers of material. The constraining layers can be metal, cellulose, wood, plastic composites, vinyl or other porous or semi-porous materials. The resulting attenuation of sound is significantly improved compared to the attenuation of sound obtained using standard plywood. Throughout this application, wood or cellulose material can be several different types of cellulose sheet material, such as but not limited to plywood, OSB, compressed fiber board or MDF.
This invention will be more fully understood in light of the following drawings taken together with the following detailed description.
The following detailed description is meant to be exemplary only and not limiting. Other embodiments of this invention—such as the number, type, thickness and placement order of both external and internal layer materials—will be obvious to those skilled in the art in view of this description.
The process for creating such laminar panels takes into account many factors: the exact chemical composition of the glue; the various symmetric and non-symmetric thicknesses of glue and layered material; the pressing process; the drying and dehumidification process.
The wood or cellulose material in top layer 11 typically is fabricated using standard well-known techniques and thus the method for fabricating the wood or cellulose material will not be described. Next, on the bottom of the wood or cellulose material 11 is a layer of glue 12 called “Quiet glue” sometimes abbreviated QG. Glue 12, made of a unique viscoelastic polymer, has the property that the energy in the sound and vibration which strikes the glue, when constrained by surrounding layers, will be significantly absorbed by the glue thereby reducing the sound and vibration's amplitude across a broad frequency spectrum, and thus the energy of sound which will transmit through the resulting laminar structure. Typically, this glue is made of the materials as set forth in TABLE 1, although other glues having the characteristics set forth directly below Table 1 can also be used in this invention.
The physical solid-state characteristics of QuietGlue include:
Following glue layer 12 is a metal layer 13. Metal layer 13 is, in one embodiment, 30 gauge galvanized steel of 0.013 inch thickness. Of course, other gauge galvanized steel and even other metals can be used if desired. For example, aluminum can also be used if desired, as can specialty metals such as sheets of ultra-light weight titanium and laminated layers of metal including laminates of aluminum and titanium. The thickness of metal layer 13 may range from 1/100th to twice the thickness of layer 11. Of importance is that galvanized steel, if used, be non-oiled and of regular spackle. Non-oil is required to insure that the QuietGlue layer 12 will adhere to the top surface of metal layer 13 and the adjacent QuietGlue layer 14 on the bottom of metal layer 13 will also adhere to the surfaced metal 13. Regular spackle insures that the metal has uniform properties over its whole area.
Next, glue layer 14 is placed in a carefully controlled manner with respect to coverage and thickness on the bottom of metal layer 13. Glue layer 14 is again a viscoelastic material which absorbs sound and vibration and is typically the same material as glue layer 12. Finally, gypsum board layer 15 is placed on the bottom of the structure and carefully pressed in a controlled manner with respect to uniform pressure (pound per square inch), temperature and time.
Finally, the assembly is subjected to dehumidification and drying to allow the panels to dry, typically for forty-eight (48) hours.
Typical fire codes require a wall or floor structure capable of withstanding flames for up to one hour. The metal core, together with the external wood or cellulose board layers are intended to give to the resulting laminar structure a minimum of one hour resistance to fire, and possibly as high as four (4) hours in certain configurations, and thereby allows the resulting structure to meet typical fire codes.
Metal layer 13, typically 30-gauge steel (but may be other metals, ranging for example from 10 gauge to 40 gauge, depending on weight, thickness, and STC desired), is about the thickness of a business card. Of importance, before assembling, this metal should not be creased because creasing will ruin the ability of this metal to assist in reducing the transmission of sound. Only completely flat, undamaged pieces of metal can be used in the laminar structure.
An advantage of this structure is that the presence of metal layer 13 in the middle of the laminar panel results in a structure which will be capable of substantially attenuating radio frequency (RF) energy and electromagnetic radiation. In other words, the panels of this invention incorporating the sheet metal in the middle of the panels are capable of being used in a room so as to cause the room to be impervious to RF signals and suppress electromagnetic interference or radiation. As a result, a room paneled on the walls, ceiling and floor and using a door likewise containing the panels of this invention can be a secure room incapable of being penetrated by RF signals and electromagnetic interference. In particular, tests show that the steel of the sheet in the middle of the laminate panel of this invention reduces RF radiation by up to 60 decibels (60 db) thereby effectively allowing a room to be constructed which is totally shielded from RF radiation. The advantage of this embodiment of the invention is that the contractor installing the laminate panels containing the steel sheet will be installing the panels without knowing that the resulting structure will be impervious to RF signals and electromagnetic interference. Thus secure rooms can be fabricated using the panels of this invention without contractors knowing that in fact they are constructing such secure rooms. The panels of this invention when attached to steel studs using metal screws automatically electrically tie to all the other panels in the room and in the ceiling, floor, and door, and thereby result in a totally grounded shield surrounding the enclosed space or room. No additional electrical conductors must be attached to the walls with the result that the structure is much more economical to fabricate than in the prior art.
In an alternative embodiment, steel 13 is replaced by mass-loaded vinyl or a similar product. However, the steel has much less forgiveness than vinyl and thus can outperform vinyl as a constraining layer. However, for other ease-of-cutting reasons, vinyl can be used in the laminar structure in place of steel, if desired. Cellulose, wood, gypsum, plastic, ceramics, or composites of other constraining materials may also be used in place of vinyl or metal. The alternative material can be any type and of any appropriate thickness.
The resulting structure is capable of being cut using standard wood saws with wood blades.
Again, the galvanized steel is non-oiled and regular spackle for the reasons discussed above in conjunction with the embodiment of
In fabricating the structures of
The structure of
It is noted that uneven application of QuietGlue or leaving an air gap at the ends of the sheets of soundproofing material described above may hurt the STC ratings by several points. Moreover, to improve the soundproofing qualities of walls, floors, ceilings or doors made with these materials, glue must be evenly applied all the way to the ends and corners of the sheets. All of the panels described above may be cut with a regular saw blade using a typical saw.
The sound transmission class numbers given above basically are numbers which are used in the architectural field to rate partitions, doors and windows for their effectiveness in blocking sound. The number assigned to a particular partition design as a result of STC testing represents a best fit type of approach to a set of curves that define the sound transmission class. The test is conducted in such a way to make it independent of the test environment and gives a number for the partition only. The STC measurement method is defined by ASTM E90 laboratory test for sound measurements obtained in ⅓ octave bands, and ASTM E413 for calculating “STC” (Sound Transmission Class) numbers from the sound transmission loss in each partition, and these standards are available on the internet at http://www.astm.org.
Data showing the transmission loss in decibels as a function of frequency for the soundproofing material of this invention is set forth in
The center frequency of the ⅓ octave bands is set forth in the two rows of the table. The top line of each row represents the ⅓ octave band center frequency. The second row of numbers in each horizontal category represents the transmission loss (TL) in decibels (db) and the third set of numbers represents a 95% confidence level in db deficiencies. The EWR and OITC stand for External Wall Rating and Outdoor-Indoor Transmission Class, respectively, and represent other methods of measuring transmission loss. The final sound transmission class number is set forth under the notation STC in the lower right corner. For the use of two panels of the type shown in
It is known to those practicing in this field that a similar configuration with standard ⅝ inch plywood on both sides of standard 2×4 construction yields an STC of 29. Accordingly, this invention yields a 20 STC point improvement over standard drywall in this particular construction.
The National Research Council of Canada (NRC) has documented the STC rating of many other configurations (e.g., using wood and steel studs in standard, staggered beam or double beam construction with various isolators such as resilient channels and with various acoustic insulation fillers such as sound board, cellulose and fiberglass batt). This invention has been subjected to the same types of tests.
The use of a single panel, alone, of the type shown in
One embodiment of the present invention is illustrated in
If galvanized steel is utilized for constraining layer 52, it should be non-oiled and regular spackle, and as noted above it should not be creased and should be perfectly flat. In constructing laminar panel 45, viscoelastic glue layers 50 and 51 are rolled onto surfaces 48 and 49, respectively, of layers 46 and 47. Next, constraining layer 52 is placed on the exposed surface of viscoelastic glue layer 51, and layer 46 with its associated layer 50 of viscoelastic glue is then placed on top of the constraining layer 52. The structure is then compressed using a pressure of approximately one to five lbs. per square inch. Application of heat may also be used and if so the temperature range would be about 90 degrees to 130 degrees fahrenheit.
Laminar panel 45 is particularly advantageous when used as a material for floors or in other applications where wood alone would normally be utilized.
Accordingly, the laminar structure of this invention provides a significant improvement in the sound transmission class number associated with the structures and thus reduces significantly the sound transmitted from one room to adjacent rooms.
An alternative embodiment of this invention is asymmetric, being made up of a relatively thick layer of material on one surface of which is placed viscoelastic glue. Over the viscoelastic glue is placed a thin layer of material relative to the first layer of material. This thin layer of material can be a constraining layer, such as metal or vinyl or rubber or any other appropriate thin material. This structure has sound reducing qualities, but is lighter and easier to handle than the structures described in
The dimensions given for each material in the laminar structures of this invention can be varied as desired to control cost, overall thickness, weight and STC results. The described embodiments and their dimensions are illustrative only and not limiting.
Other embodiments of this invention will be obvious in view of the above description.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2811906 | Chappell | Nov 1957 | A |
3092250 | Knutson et al. | Jun 1963 | A |
3106503 | Randall et al. | Oct 1963 | A |
3160549 | Caldwell et al. | Dec 1964 | A |
3215225 | Kirschner | Nov 1965 | A |
3336710 | Raynes | Aug 1967 | A |
3399104 | Ball, III et al. | Aug 1968 | A |
3424270 | Hartman et al. | Jan 1969 | A |
3462899 | Sherman | Aug 1969 | A |
3468750 | Taylor et al. | Sep 1969 | A |
3579941 | Tibbals | May 1971 | A |
3642511 | Cohn et al. | Feb 1972 | A |
3652360 | Hartman et al. | Mar 1972 | A |
3728209 | Watanabe et al. | Apr 1973 | A |
3828504 | Egerborg et al. | Aug 1974 | A |
3956563 | Spang et al. | May 1976 | A |
4003752 | Osohata et al. | Jan 1977 | A |
4112176 | Bailey | Sep 1978 | A |
4117197 | Krejci et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
4134956 | Suzuki et al. | Jan 1979 | A |
4156615 | Cukier et al. | May 1979 | A |
4195713 | Hagbjer et al. | Apr 1980 | A |
4259220 | Bunnelle et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
4347912 | Flocke et al. | Sep 1982 | A |
4364017 | Tokunaga et al. | Dec 1982 | A |
4375516 | Barrall | Mar 1983 | A |
4412255 | Kurihara et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
4487793 | Haines et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
4488619 | O'Neill | Dec 1984 | A |
4557970 | Holtrop et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4618370 | Green et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
4642951 | Mortimer | Feb 1987 | A |
4663224 | Tabata et al. | May 1987 | A |
4678515 | Green et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4685259 | Eberhart et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4719261 | Bunnelle et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4759164 | Abendroth et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4778028 | Staley | Oct 1988 | A |
4786543 | Ferm | Nov 1988 | A |
4791044 | Yoshino | Dec 1988 | A |
4806703 | Sims | Feb 1989 | A |
4924969 | K'Heureux | May 1990 | A |
4941207 | Maeda et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4956321 | Barrall | Sep 1990 | A |
4965408 | Chapman et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4967530 | Clunn | Nov 1990 | A |
4977926 | Hocking | Dec 1990 | A |
5016413 | Counihan | May 1991 | A |
5026593 | O'Brien | Jun 1991 | A |
5033247 | Clunn | Jul 1991 | A |
5063098 | Niwa et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5110660 | Wolf et al. | May 1992 | A |
5125475 | Duchame et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5158612 | Savoly et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5240639 | Diez et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5256223 | Alberts et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5258585 | Juriga | Nov 1993 | A |
5304415 | Kurihara et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5334806 | Avery | Aug 1994 | A |
5342465 | Bronowicki et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5368914 | Barrett | Nov 1994 | A |
5439735 | Jamison | Aug 1995 | A |
5473122 | Kodiyalam et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5474840 | Landin | Dec 1995 | A |
5496966 | Hightower et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5502931 | Munir | Apr 1996 | A |
5585178 | Calhoun et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5595801 | Fahy et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5603192 | Dickson | Feb 1997 | A |
5629503 | Thomasen | May 1997 | A |
5643666 | Eckart et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5644880 | Lehnert et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5664397 | Holz | Sep 1997 | A |
5691037 | McCutcheon et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5695867 | Saitoh et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5768841 | Swartz et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5824973 | Haines et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5827609 | Ercillo et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5867957 | Holtrop | Feb 1999 | A |
5907932 | LeConte et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5910082 | Bender et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5918437 | Dobija | Jul 1999 | A |
5945208 | Richards et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5945643 | Casser | Aug 1999 | A |
5954497 | Cloud et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6077613 | Gaffigan | Jun 2000 | A |
6103640 | Yoshikawa et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6123171 | McNett et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6133172 | Sevenish et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6213252 | Ducharme | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6238594 | Turpin et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6240704 | Porter | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6266427 | Mathur | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6286280 | Fahmy et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6290021 | Strandgaard | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6309985 | Virnelson et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6342284 | Yu et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6381196 | Hein et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6389771 | Moller | May 2002 | B1 |
6391958 | Luongo | May 2002 | B1 |
6443256 | Baig | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6443257 | Wiker et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6536555 | Kesic et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6632550 | Yu et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6676744 | Merkley et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6699426 | Burke | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6715241 | Gelin et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6747074 | Buckingham et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6758305 | Gelin et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6790520 | Todd et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6790525 | Takeuchi et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6800161 | Takigawa | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6803110 | Drees et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6815049 | Veramasuneni | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6822033 | Yu | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6825137 | Fu et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6877585 | Tinianov | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6910667 | O'Leary et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6913667 | Nudo et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6920723 | Downey | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6941720 | Deford et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7012190 | Price | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7041377 | Miura et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7068033 | Sellers et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7087670 | Hoch et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7160610 | Takeuchi et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7181891 | Surace et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7194846 | Swiszez et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7197855 | Della Pepa | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7307223 | Tyson et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7745005 | Tinianov | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7798287 | Surace et al. | Sep 2010 | B1 |
7799410 | Tnianov | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7874402 | Doneux et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7883763 | Tinianov | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7909136 | Surace et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7921965 | Surace | Apr 2011 | B1 |
8028800 | Ravnaas | Oct 2011 | B2 |
20020009622 | Goodson | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020029929 | Tinianov | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020092703 | Gelin et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020139611 | Baig | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030006090 | Reed | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030070367 | Gelin et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030102184 | Brisson et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030114064 | Fu et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030117787 | Nakauchi | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040016184 | Huebsch et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040087721 | Bruhn et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040168853 | Gunasekera et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040177590 | Nudo et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040214008 | Dobrusky et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050040825 | Sellers et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050080193 | Wouters et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050103568 | Sapoval et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050136276 | Borup et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050263925 | Heseltine et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060048682 | Wagh et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060057345 | Surace et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060059806 | Gosling et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060108175 | Surace et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060124388 | Pompei | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070094950 | Surace et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070107350 | Surace et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070175173 | Babineau, Jr. et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080264721 | Tinianov et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090000245 | Tinianov et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20100170746 | Restuccia et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2219785 | Oct 1996 | CA |
2134439 | May 1993 | CN |
1358684 | Jul 2002 | CN |
0412816 | Feb 1991 | EP |
1154087 | Nov 2001 | EP |
1388836 | Feb 2004 | EP |
2007-506158 | Jul 1995 | JP |
2008-156173 | Jun 1996 | JP |
09-203153 | Aug 1997 | JP |
2011-219186 | Aug 1999 | JP |
2001-522751 | Nov 2001 | JP |
2002-117825 | Apr 2002 | JP |
2002-164690 | Jun 2002 | JP |
2002-188231 | Jul 2002 | JP |
2002-520544 | Jul 2002 | JP |
2003-071834 | Mar 2003 | JP |
2003-221496 | Aug 2003 | JP |
2006-250669 | Sep 2006 | JP |
2010-054096 | Mar 2010 | JP |
WO 9321402 | Oct 1993 | WO |
WO 9634261 | Oct 1996 | WO |
WO 9719033 | May 1997 | WO |
WO 9924290 | May 1999 | WO |
WO 0002204 | Jan 2000 | WO |
WO 0024690 | May 2000 | WO |
Entry |
---|
IES 2000 (Jul. 2, 2003) AUanta.com/product pp. 1-6. |
Wikipedia: the free encyclopeida, Hot-dip galvanizing, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galvanized—steel. |
“Damping of plate flexural vibrations by means of viscoelastic laminae” by D. Ross, E.E. Ungar, and E.M. Kerwin—Structural Damping, Section III, ASME, 1959, New York (41 pages). |
IES 2000 Dampening and Visocelastic Membranes (Jul. 2, 2003) Atlanta.com/product (pp. 1-6). |
WAYBACKMACHINE search results for Jan. 1, 1996-May 3, 2006 (1 page). |
Noise and Vibration Control Engineering: Principles and Applications, Edited by Leo Beranek and Instvan Ver, Chapter 11, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1002, (12 pages), 1992. |
Handbook of Acoustical Measurements and Noise Control, Edited by Cyril Harris, Chapter 32; Structureborne Sound Isolation, Chapter 33; Noise Control in Buildings, McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1991, (36 pages). |
“Green Glue is your soundproofing solution and noise reduction material”, www.greengluecompany.com (2 pages), Nov. 9, 2006. |
Acoustical: A Sound Approach to Testing, www.archest.com/pages (2 pages), 2000. |
STC—Sound Transmission Class—Discussion and Use, www.sota.ca/stc—info.htm (3 pages), Aug. 13, 2003. |
ASTM International, Designation: C 1396/C 1396M-04, Standard Specification for Gypsum Board (7 pages), Jan. 5, 2007. |
Barbara C. Lippiatt, National Institute of Standards and Technology. BEES 3.0, “Building for Environmental and Economic Sustainability Technical Manual and User Guide”, Oct. 2002, (198 pages). |
Takada, et al., Effect in Reducing Floor Impact Noise of Recycled Paper Damper Members, Bulletin of Tokyo Metropolitan Industrial Technology Research Institute, No. 2 (1999) [certified English translation] (13 pages). |
Architectural Acoustics, M. David Egan, J. Ross Publishing (Reprint 2007) p. 211; originally published McGraw-Hill, 1988 (5 pages). |
Hastings, Mardi C.; Godfrey, Richard; Babcock, G. Madison, Application of Small Panel Damping Measurements to Larger Walls, Proc. SPIE vol. 2720, p. 70-76, Smart Structures and Materials 1996: Passive Damping and Isolation (7 pages). |
van Vuure, A.W.; Verpoest, I., Ko, F.K., Sandwich-Fabric Panels as Spacers in a Constrained Layer Structural Damping Application, Composites Part B 32 (2001) 11-19, Elsevier Science Ltd. (9 pages). |
Noise and Vibration Control, Revised Edition, pp. 306-315, Institute of Noise Control Engineering, 1988, Beranek, Leo L. (editor) (9 pages). |
Noise and Vibration Control, Chapter Fourteen, Damping of Panels, Ungar, Eric E., pp. 434-473, McGraw-Hill, 1971, Beranek, Leo L. (editor) (7 pages). |
Noise and Vibration Control Engineering, Principles and Application, pp. 466-479, John Wiley & Sons, 1992, Beranek, Leo L. and Ver, Istvan L. (editors) (9 pages). |
Nashif, Ahid D.; Jones, David I.G.; Henderson, John P., Vibration Damping, pp. 290-305, John Wiley & Sons, 1985 (18 pages). |
Architectural Acoustics, Principles and Practice, John Wiley & sons, 1992, Cavanaugh, William J. and Wilkes, Joseph A. (editors) (332 pages). |
FIRE Resistance Design Manual, Sound Control, Gypsum Association, GA-600-94 (14th Ed) (107 pages), 1994. |
FIRE Resistance Design Manual, Sound Control, Gypsum Association, GA-600-97 (15th Ed.) (120 pages), 1997. |
FIRE Resistance Design Manual, Sound Control, Gypsum Association, GA-600-2000 (16th Ed.) (139 pages), 2000. |
Noxon, Arthur M., The Chain is as Strong as its Weakest Link, An article written for the first Hong Kong HiFi Show, 1993, Translated and Published in Chinese, http://www.acousticsciences.com/articles/chain.htm (7 pages). |
Quiet Lightweight Floor Systems, Reprint from Sound and Vibration Magazine, Jul. 1992, by David A. Harris, Building & Acoustic Design Consultants (7 pages). |
Joyal, Brian, Constrained-Layer Systems Provide Weight-Efficient, High Level Damping (4 pages), Sep. 13, 2007. |
Frankovich, David, The Four-Fold Method of Noise and Vibration Control (8 pages), Sep. 13, 2007. |
Renninger, Jennifer, Understanding Damping Techniques for Noise and Vibration Control (8 pages), Sep. 13, 2007. |
Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC) Noise and Vibration Control, UFC 3-450-01. 15 May 200, Department of Defense (152 pages). |
United States Gypsum, Architectural and Construction Services, Design Data for Acousticians, Feb. 1986 (79 pages). |
A Study of Techniques to Increase the Sound of Insulation of Building Elements, Wyle Laboratories, Prepared for Dept. of Housing and Urban Development, Jun. 1973 (12 pages). |
dB-Ply materials Sound Reducing Panels from Greenwood Forest Products, Inc., Apr. 24, 1997 (9 pages). |
dB-Rock materials OMNI Products, Inc. (3 pages), Sep. 13, 2007. |
ASC WallDamp materials from Acoustic Sciences Corporation http://web.archive.org/web/20021013031149/www.asc-soundproof.com/index-walldamp . . . May 18, 2007 (21 pages). |
Sounddown Viscoelastic Glue DG-A2, Soundown Corporation (2 pages), Sep. 13, 2007. |
Nordisk Akustik A/S materials, http://web.archive.org/web/200206240933724/www.nordisk-akustik.dk/html—uk/prod03.ht . . . Jun. 11, 2007 (4 pages). |
Dynamat materials http://web.archive.org/web/20010525113753/www.admteschusa.com/Dynamat.html Jun. 12, 2007, ADM Tech—Dynamic Control (15 pages). |
Noise Killer: Pro Damping Compound Materials http://www.tnt-audio.com/clinica/noise.html May 18, 2007, 1998 (3 pages). |
WAYBACKMACHINE search results for Jan. 1, 1996-Jun. 12, 2007 (1 page). |
Vandersall , H. L., “Intumescent Coating Systems, Their development and Chemistry” J. Fire & Flammability, vol. 2 (Apr. 1971) pp. 97-140 (45 pages). |
English Language Abstract, JP Patent First Publication No. 09-203153, Aug. 5, 1997, (2 pages). |
A Study of Techniques to Increase the Sound of Insulation of Building Elements, Wyle Laboratories, Prepared for Dept. of Housing and Urban Development, Jun. 1973 (16 pages). |
Field Sound Insulation Evaluation of Load-Beating Sandwich Panels for Housing, Final Report, Prepared by Robert E. Jones, Forest Products Laboratory, Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Aug. 1975 (53 pages). |
Sound Studio Construction on a Budget, F. Alton Evererst, McGraw-Hill, 1997 (7 pages). |
Wood Handbook/Wood as an Engineering Material, United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-113, Mar. 1999 (24 pages). |
Transmission Loss of Plasterboard Walls by T. D. Northwood, Building Research Note, Division of Building Research, National Research Counsel, Ottawa, Canada (10 pages), Jan. 19, 1970. |
A Guide to Airborne, Impact, and Structureborne Noise Control in Multifamily Dwellings, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Prepared for the National Bureau of Standards, Washington, D.C., Jan. 1963 (5 pages). |
Transmission Loss of Leaded Building Materials, Paul B. Ostergaard, Richmond L. Cardinell, and Lewis S. Goodfriend, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 35, No. 6, Jun. 1963 (7 pages). |
Dictionary of Architecture & Construction 2200 illustrations, Third Edition, Edited By Cyril M. Harris, Professor Emeritus of Architecture Columbia University, McGraw-Hill, 2000 (7 pages). |
Dictionary of Engineering Materials, Harald Keller, Uwe Erb, Wiley-Interscience by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2004 (4 pages). |
Chamber Science and Technology Dictionary, by Professor Peter M. B. Walker, W & R Chambers Ltd and Cambridge University Press, 1988 (3 pages). |
Supplementary European Search Report, EP Application No. 06827584, dated Nov. 4, 2009. |
PCT/US06/43247, International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, 4 pages, dated Dec. 5, 2007. |
M.N. Darrouj et al., Optimum Design of Constrained Layer Damping Panels, Materials and Design, vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 202-208, Jul.-Aug. 1989. |
D.I.G. Jones, Handbook of Viscoelastic Vibration Damping, John Wiley and Sons, pp. 284-297, Aug. 2001. |
English Abstract of Japanese Patent No. 2002-164690, published Jun. 7, 2002, 2 pages. |
English Abstract of Chinese Patent No. 1358684, Jul. 17, 2002, 1 page. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2010/36411 dated Aug. 4, 2010. |
Z. Xie et al., An Enhanced Beam Model for Constrained Layer Damping and a Parameter Study of Damping Contribution, Journal of Suond and Vibration, vol. 319, Iss 3-5, pp. 1271-1284, Jan. 23, 2009. |
G. Lepoittevin et al., Optimization of Segmented Constrained Layer Damping With Mathematical Programming Using Strain Energy Analysis and Modal Data, Materials and Design, vol. 31, Iss. 1, pp. 14-24, Jan. 2010. |
Sidney Lauren, Adhesives for Wallboard, in Adhesives in Building, Apr. 20, 1962, Building Research Institute, pp. 11-16. |
Creton, Constantino, Pressure-Sensitive Adhesives: An Introductory Course, MRS Bulletin, Jun. 2003, pp. 434-439. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion in related International Application No. Pct/US08/68861 dated Sep. 5, 2008, 7 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion in related International Application No. PCT/US08/68863 dated Sep. 17, 2008, 6 pages. |
Pritz, Loss Factor Peak of Viscoelastic Materials: Magnitude to Width Relations, J. of Sound and Vibration, 246(2): pp. 265-280, 2001. |
Japanese Office Action dated May 12, 2009 for related Japanese Application No. 2006-525373. |
Japanese Office Action dated Dec. 22, 2009 for related Japanese Application No. 2006-525373. |
Chinese Office Action dated Dec. 26, 2008 for related Chinese Application No. 2004800325949. |
Supplementary European Search Report dated Mar. 24, 2009 for related European Application No. 04782564.1. |
Spec-Data Quiet Solution Datahseet, Reed Construction Data, 2005. |
Armstrong Basic Drywall Grid Installation Guide, http://web.archive.org/web/*/http:www.armstrong.com/common/c2002/content/files/4279.pdf original publication dated May 30, 2005, retrieved Aug. 19, 2008. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion in related International Application No. PCT/US2008/59960 dated Jul. 11, 2008, 6 pages. |
www.acousticalsolutions.com/products/pdfs/install—green—glue.pdf accessed Nov. 5, Using Green Glue is a Straightforward Process, retrieved Nov. 5, 2009, 12 pages. |
Cheng et al., Vibration Attenuation of Panel Structures by Optimally Shaped Viscoelastic Coating With Added Weight Considerations, Thin-Walled Structures, 21 (1995), pp. 307-326. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion in related International Application No. PCT/US10/50272 dated Nov. 15, 2010, 8 pages. |
Patent Examination Report No. 1 dated Apr. 24, 2013 from related Australian Application No. 2008237205, 5 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated May 3, 2013 from related U.S. Appl. No. 11/697,691, 15 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060057345 A1 | Mar 2006 | US |