Noise control and moisture management constitute two rapidly growing economic and public policy concerns for the construction industry. Areas with high acoustical isolation (commonly referred to as ‘soundproofed’) are requested and required for a variety of purposes. Apartments, condominiums, hotels, schools and hospitals all require rooms with walls, ceilings and floors that reduce the transmission of sound thereby minimizing, or eliminating, the disturbance to people in adjacent rooms. Soundproofing is particularly important in buildings adjacent to public transportation, such as highways, airports and railroad lines. Additionally theaters, home theaters, music practice rooms, recording studios and others require increased noise abatement. Likewise, hospitals and general healthcare facilities have begun to recognize acoustical comfort as an important part of a patient's recovery time. One measure of the severity of multi-party residential and commercial noise control issues is the widespread emergence of model building codes and design guidelines that specify minimum Sound Transmission Class (STC) ratings for specific wall structures within a building. Another measure is the broad emergence of litigation between homeowners and builders over the issue of unacceptable noise levels. To the detriment of the U.S. economy, both problems have resulted in major builders refusing to build homes, condos and apartments in certain municipalities; and in widespread cancellation of liability insurance for builders. The International Code Council has established that the minimum sound isolation between multiple tenant dwellings or between dwellings and corridors is a lab certified STC 50. Regional codes or builder specifications for these walls are often STC 60 or more.
In addition the issue of noise control, fire resistance is an equally important construction industry concern. In fact, the primary objective of today's model building codes is ensuring that building occupants are safe from fire. The model building codes such as that of the International Code Council (ICC) or the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) are written so that buildings will protect occupants who aren't intimate with the initial fire development for as long as they need to evacuate, relocate, or defend themselves in place. Buildings are also designed to provide firefighters and emergency responders with a reasonable degree of safety during search and rescue operations, and reasonably protect people near the fire from injury and death. Finally, the codes intend to protect adjacent buildings from substantial damage during a fire. These building codes use fire resistance to create safe structures in a strategy is known as compartmentation. The concept is to prevent a fire from spreading from the compartment of origin to an adjacent compartment for a prescribed length of time. For this purpose, a compartment can be defined in many ways: such as the occupied rooms of multi-family dwellings; as an entire building or some portion of a building (e.g. one floor in a high-rise); or as a single room like a hotel room. Buildings with mixed or multiple occupancies may be divided either vertically or horizontally into separate occupancies by fire-resistance-rated construction.
It is obvious that the problem is compounded when a single wall or structure needs to effectively both abate high noise levels and offer superior fire resistance.
For example, a traditional method for ensuring the fire resistance of a wall assembly is though the use of multiple layers of specially formulated gypsum wallboard. This wallboard, termed type X by the manufacturer, has a high density core reinforced with fiberglass fibers and sold in typical thicknesses of ⅝ inch and 1 inch. Major US manufacturers of type X gypsum include United States Gypsum of Chicago, Ill., National Gypsum of Charlotte, N.C., Georgia Pacific of Atlanta, Ga. and Lafarge of Paris, France. The conflict in the two requirements is evident in the case of many typical wood framed wall assemblies. A single stud wall assembly with a single layer of type X gypsum wallboard on each side is recognized as having a one-hour rating. Similarly, a single stud wall assembly with two layers of type X gypsum wallboard per side has a two-hour fire resistance rating. Unfortunately, while these example walls may meet or exceed the fire resistance requirements of the applicable building code, their acoustical performance is inadequate. That same single stud wall with a single layer of type X gypsum wallboard has been laboratory tested to an STC 34—well below code requirements. A similar wall configuration consisting of two layers of type X gypsum wall board on one side and a single layer of type X gypsum board on the other is an STC 36—only a slightly better result. Obviously, type X gypsum wallboard is an excellent fire resistive element, but a poor acoustical material. Other systems for improving the acoustical performance do exist, including mass loaded vinyl, resilient channels, and sound isolating clips. However, these techniques only add steps and materials to the assembly and do not contribute in any way to the final assembly's fire resistance.
Accordingly, what is needed is a new material and a new method of construction to reduce the transmission of sound from a given room to an adjacent area while simultaneously providing adequate fire resistance.
A figure of merit for the sound attenuating qualities of a material or method of construction is the material's Sound Transmission Class (STC). The STC numbers are ratings which are used in the architectural field to rate partitions, doors and windows for their effectiveness in reducing the transmission of sound. The rating assigned to a particular partition design is a result of acoustical testing and represents a best fit type of approach to a set of curves that define the sound transmission class. The test is conducted in such a way as to make measurement of the partition independent of the test environment and gives a number for the partition performance only. The STC measurement method is defined by ASTM E90 “Standard Test Method Laboratory Measurement of Airborne Sound Transmission Loss of Building Partitions and Elements,” and ASTM E413 “Classification for Sound Insulation,” used to calculate STC ratings from the sound transmission loss data for a given structure. These standards are available on the Internet at http://www.astm.org.
A figure of merit for the measurement of the fire resistance of a material or method of construction, is its fire resistance rating as measured in minutes (or hours) of time. The ASTM E119, “Standard Test Methods for Fire Tests of Building Construction and Materials” is conducted using a furnace with opening dimensions of approximately 9 feet high by 12 feet wide (2.77 m×3.7 m). The assembly is installed onto the open face of the furnace and loaded to its design capacity. The furnace temperature is regulated along a standard time-temperature curve. The test starts at room temperature and then rises to 1,000° F. (540° C.) at 5 minutes, 1,300° F. (705° C.) at 10 minutes, 1,700° F. (9250° C.) at one hour, and 1,850° F. (1,010° C.) at two hours. The test is terminated and the rating time established when one of the following events occurs: hot gases passing through the assembly ignite cotton waste; thermocouples on top of the assembly show a temperature rise averaging 250° F. (140° C.); a single rise of 325° F. (180° C.) is achieved; the assembly collapses. The E119 test of doors and ceilings is similar to the wall test. In the case of a ceiling test, a horizontal furnace is used. Reference is sometimes made to Underwriter Laboratories Test Standards in both Canada and the United States, but these standards are identical to E119 in all important features.
The building codes require fire-resistance ratings, depending on area and height of building, the type of construction, and the intended occupancy. When fire resistance is required for combustible assemblies, the ratings are usually one hour in the United States and either 45 minutes or one hour in Canada. Data presented hereinafter was taken using the ASTM E119 method modified for small scale test samples. Further information may be found on the Internet at http://www.astm.org.
In accordance with the present invention, a new laminated structure and associated manufacturing process are disclosed which significantly improves the ability of a wall, ceiling, floor or door to resist the penetration of a fire while simultaneously reducing the transmission of sound from one room to an adjacent room, or from the exterior to the interior of a room, or from the interior to the exterior of a room.
The material comprises a lamination of several different materials. In accordance with one embodiment, a laminated substitute for drywall comprises a sandwich of two outer layers of selected thickness gypsum board which are glued to each other, using an intumescent, sound dissipating adhesive wherein the sound dissipating adhesive is applied in a certain pattern to some or all of the interior surfaces of the two outer layers. In one embodiment, the glue layer is a specially formulated intumescent fire-resistive FE QuietGlue® adhesive, which is a viscoelastic material available from Serious Materials, 1250 Elko Drive, Sunnyvale, Calif. 94089. In addition to the typical chemicals that make up the fire-resistive FE QuietGlue® adhesive, additional fire retardant compounds are added to aid the formation of a char layer and increase the fire resistance of the laminated panel.
Formed on the interior surfaces of the two gypsum boards, the glue layer is about 1/16 inch thick. In one instance, a 4 foot×8 foot panel consisting of two ¼ inch thick gypsum wall board panels laminated together using a 1/16 layer inch thick of glue has a total thickness of approximately ½ inch. When used in a standard single wood stud frame, the assembly has a fire resistance rating of approximately 41 minutes and an STC value of approximately 49. For comparison, a similar wall assembly constructed with ½ inch thick standard gypsum wallboard has a fire resistance rating of 27 minutes and an STC rating of approximately 34. The result is a reduction in noise transmitted through the wall structure of approximately 15 decibels and an increase of the fire resistance by 14 minutes compared to the same structure using common (untreated) gypsum boards of equivalent mass and thickness, and construction effort.
This invention will be more fully understood in light of the following drawings taken together with the following detailed description in which:
The following detailed description is meant to be exemplary only and not limiting. Other embodiments of this invention, such as the number, type, thickness, dimensions, area, shape, and placement order of both external and internal layer materials, will be obvious to those skilled in the art in view of this description.
The process for creating laminated panels in accordance with the present invention takes into account many factors: exact chemical composition of the glue; pressing process; and drying and dehumidification process.
The gypsum board in top layer 101 typically is fabricated using standard well-known techniques and thus the method for fabricating the gypsum board will not be described. Next, on the bottom surface 101-1 of the gypsum board 101 is a patterned layer of intumescent glue 102 called “Fire-Enhanced (FE) QuietGlue®” adhesive. Glue 102, made of a viscoelastic polymer doped with fire retardants, has the properties of sound dissipation and enhanced fire resistance. The layer 102 may have a thickness from about 1/64 inch to about ⅛ inch thickness although other configurations may be used. When energy in the sound interacts with the glue when constrained by surrounding layers, it will be significantly dissipated thereby reducing the sound's amplitude across a broad frequency spectrum. As a result, the energy of sound which will transmit through the resulting laminated structure is significantly reduced. Typically, glue 102 is made of the materials as set forth in TABLE 1, although other glues having similar characteristics to those set forth directly below Table 1 can also be used in this invention.
An important component of the glue composition and the overall laminated structure is the addition of intumescent compounds. Intumescent compositions are materials which, when heated above their critical temperature, will bubble and swell, thereby forming a thick non-flammable multi-cellular insulative barrier, up to 200 or more times their original thickness. When applied as intumescent coatings they can provide the protective, serviceable and aesthetic properties of non fire-retardant coatings or layers without occupying any additional initial volume. Intumescent coatings are discussed in detail in Intumescent Coating Systems, Their Development and Chemistry, H. L. Vandersall, J. Fire & Flammability, Vol. 2 (April 1971) pages 97-140, the content of which article is herein incorporated by reference.
Although the majority of commercially available intumescent coatings provide a substantially carbonaceous foam, it is within the scope of this invention to employ inorganic foaming mixtures, (e.g. phosphate/borate) mixtures, expandable graphite intercalation compounds, or a combination of both. The intumescent materials which may be employed in the practice of this invention should swell to at least about two times their original thickness when heated above their critical temperature.
Expandable graphite intercalation compounds are also known as expanding graphite and are commercially available. They are compounds, which contain foreign components intercalated between the lattice layers of the graphite. Such expandable graphite intercalation compounds usually are prepared by dispersing graphite particles in a solution, which contains an oxidizing agent and a guest compound, which is to be intercalated. Usually, nitric acid, potassium chlorate, chromic acid, potassium permanganate and the like are used as oxidizing agent.
The preferred formulation is but one example of a viscoelastic glue. Other formulations may be used to achieve similar results and the range given is an example of successful formulations investigated here.
The physical solid-state characteristics of FE QuietGlue® adhesive include:
Gypsum board layer 103 is placed on the bottom of the structure and carefully pressed in a controlled manner with respect to uniform pressure (measured in pounds per square inch), temperature and time.
Finally, the assembly is subjected to dehumidification and drying to allow the panels to dry, typically for forty-eight (48) hours.
In one embodiment of this invention, the glue 102, when spread over the bottom surface 101-1 of top layer 101 or any other material, is subject to a gas flow for about forty-five seconds to partially dry the glue. The gas can be heated, in which case the flow time may be reduced. The glue 102, when originally spread out over any material to which it is being applied, is liquid. By partially drying out the glue 102, either by air drying for a selected time or by providing a gas flow over the surface of the glue, the glue 102 becomes a sticky paste much like the glue on a tape, commonly termed a pressure sensitive adhesive. The second panel, for example the bottom layer 103, is then placed over the glue 102 and pressed against the material beneath the glue 102 (as in the example of
In one embodiment the glue 102 is about 1/16th of an inch thick, however other thicknesses may be used. The glue 102 may be applied with a brush, putty knife, caulking gun, sprayed on, applied using glue tape or other means.
In
As a further example, constraining layer 202 can be galvanized steel of a thickness such as 30 gauge (0.012 inch thick). Steel has a higher Young's Modulus than vinyl and thus can outperform vinyl as an acoustic constraining layer. However, for other ease-of-cutting reasons, vinyl can be used in the laminated structure in place of steel. Cellulose, wood, plastic, cement or other constraining materials may also be used in place of vinyl or metal. The alternative material can be any type and any appropriate thickness. In the example of
In fabricating the structure of
In fabricating the structure of
Referring to
Referring to
An embodiment of the present invention is illustrated in
For
Referring to
According to
A further embodiment of the present invention is illustrated in
Referring to
A further embodiment of the present invention is illustrated in
Turning to
A further embodiment of the present invention is illustrated in
A further embodiment of the present invention is illustrated in
A further embodiment of the present invention is illustrated in
Yet another embodiment of the present invention is disclosed in
Yet another embodiment of the present invention is illustrated in
A further embodiment of the present invention is illustrated in
Another embodiment of the present invention is disclosed
The dimensions given for each material in the laminated structures of the present invention can be varied in light of consideration such as cost, overall thickness, weight and STC and fire intrusion resistance. The above-described embodiments and their dimensions are illustrative and not limiting. In addition, further other embodiments of this invention will be obvious in view of the above description.
Accordingly, the laminated structure of this invention provides a significant improvement in the sound transmission class number associated with the structures and thus reduces significantly the sound transmitted from one room to adjacent rooms while simultaneously providing for significant improvement of the fire resistance of these structures.
The dimensions given for each material in the laminated structures of this invention can be varied as desired to control cost, overall thickness, weight, anticipated fire resistance, and STC results. The described embodiments and their dimensions are illustrative only and not limiting.
Other embodiments of this invention will be obvious in view of the above description.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2811906 | Chappell | Nov 1957 | A |
3092250 | Knutson et al. | Jun 1963 | A |
3106503 | Randall et al. | Oct 1963 | A |
3160549 | Caldwell et al. | Dec 1964 | A |
3215225 | Kirschner | Nov 1965 | A |
3336710 | Raynes | Aug 1967 | A |
3399104 | Ball, III et al. | Aug 1968 | A |
3424270 | Hartman et al. | Jan 1969 | A |
3462899 | Sherman | Aug 1969 | A |
3468750 | Pfeifer et al. | Sep 1969 | A |
3513009 | Austin et al. | May 1970 | A |
3579941 | Tibbals | May 1971 | A |
3642511 | Cohn et al. | Feb 1972 | A |
3652360 | Hartman et al. | Mar 1972 | A |
3728209 | Sugaike et al. | Apr 1973 | A |
3828504 | Egerborg et al. | Aug 1974 | A |
3879248 | Kest | Apr 1975 | A |
3956563 | Spang et al. | May 1976 | A |
3960580 | Stierli et al. | Jun 1976 | A |
4003752 | Osohata et al. | Jan 1977 | A |
4112176 | Bailey | Sep 1978 | A |
4117197 | Krejci et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
4134956 | Suzuki et al. | Jan 1979 | A |
4156615 | Cukier et al. | May 1979 | A |
4174229 | Boberski et al. | Nov 1979 | A |
4195713 | Hagbjer et al. | Apr 1980 | A |
4259220 | Bunnelle et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
4311767 | Kennedy | Jan 1982 | A |
4347912 | Flocke et al. | Sep 1982 | A |
4364017 | Tokunaga et al. | Dec 1982 | A |
4375516 | Barrall | Mar 1983 | A |
4412255 | Kuhlman et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
4487793 | Haines et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
4488619 | O'Neill | Dec 1984 | A |
4557970 | Holtrop et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4618370 | Green et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
4642951 | Mortimer | Feb 1987 | A |
4663224 | Tabata et al. | May 1987 | A |
4678515 | Green et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4685259 | Eberhart et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4719261 | Bunnelle et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4759164 | Abendroth et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4778028 | Staley | Oct 1988 | A |
4786543 | Ferm | Nov 1988 | A |
4791044 | Yoshino | Dec 1988 | A |
4806703 | Sims | Feb 1989 | A |
4924969 | K'Heureux | May 1990 | A |
4941207 | Maeda et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4956321 | Barrall | Sep 1990 | A |
4965408 | Chapman et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4967530 | Clunn | Nov 1990 | A |
4977926 | Hocking | Dec 1990 | A |
5016413 | Counihan | May 1991 | A |
5026593 | O'Brien | Jun 1991 | A |
5033247 | Clunn | Jul 1991 | A |
5063098 | Niwa et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5110660 | Wolf et al. | May 1992 | A |
5125475 | Duchame et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5143790 | Sattinger | Sep 1992 | A |
5158612 | Savoly et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5240639 | Diez et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5256223 | Alberts et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5258585 | Juriga | Nov 1993 | A |
5283998 | Jong | Feb 1994 | A |
5304415 | Kurihara et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5334806 | Avery | Aug 1994 | A |
5342465 | Bronowicki et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5368914 | Barrett | Nov 1994 | A |
5439735 | Jamison | Aug 1995 | A |
5473122 | Kodiyalam et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5474840 | Landin | Dec 1995 | A |
5496966 | Hightower et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5502931 | Munir | Apr 1996 | A |
5535920 | Blair, Jr. et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5585178 | Calhoun et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5595801 | Fahy et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5603192 | Dickson | Feb 1997 | A |
5629503 | Thomasen | May 1997 | A |
5643666 | Eckart et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5644880 | Lehnert et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5664397 | Holz | Sep 1997 | A |
5674338 | Parker et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5691037 | McCutcheon et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5695867 | Saitoh et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5768841 | Swartz et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5824973 | Haines et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5827609 | Ercillo et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5867957 | Holtrop | Feb 1999 | A |
5907932 | LeConte et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5910082 | Bender et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5918437 | Dobija | Jul 1999 | A |
5945208 | Richards et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5945643 | Casser | Aug 1999 | A |
5954497 | Cloud et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6077613 | Gaffigan | Jun 2000 | A |
6103640 | Yoshikawa et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6123171 | McNett et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6133172 | Sevenish et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6213252 | Ducharme | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6238594 | Turpin et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6240704 | Porter | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6266427 | Mathur | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6286280 | Fahmy et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6290021 | Standgaard | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6309985 | Virnelson et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6342284 | Yu | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6381196 | Hein et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6389771 | Moller | May 2002 | B1 |
6443256 | Baig | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6443257 | Wiker et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6536555 | Kelsic et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6632550 | Yu | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6672426 | Kakimoto et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6676744 | Merkley et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6699426 | Burke | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6715241 | Gelin et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6747074 | Buckingham et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6758305 | Gelin et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6790520 | Todd et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6790525 | Takeuchi et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6800161 | Takigawa | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6803110 | Drees et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6815049 | Veeramasuneni | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6822033 | Yu | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6825137 | Fu et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6877585 | Tinianov | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6913667 | Nudo et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6920723 | Downey | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6941720 | Deford et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7012190 | Price | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7041377 | Miura et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7068033 | Sellers et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7160610 | Takeuchi et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7181891 | Surace et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7197855 | Della Pepa | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7254894 | Halpert | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7255907 | Feigin et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7307223 | Tyson et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7745005 | Tinianov | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7798287 | Surace et al. | Sep 2010 | B1 |
7874402 | Doneux et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7883763 | Tinianov | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7908818 | Tinianov et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7909136 | Surace et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7921965 | Surace | Apr 2011 | B1 |
8028800 | Ravnaas | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8029881 | Surace et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8181417 | Surace et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8181738 | Tinianov | May 2012 | B2 |
20020009622 | Goodson | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020029929 | Tinianov | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20030006090 | Reed | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030070367 | Gelin et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030102184 | Brisson et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030117787 | Nakauchi | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030125447 | Hoch et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030188826 | Miller | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030232190 | O'Leary et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040016184 | Huebsch et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040087721 | Bruhn et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040168853 | Gunasekera et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040177590 | Nudo et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040213973 | Hara et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040214008 | Dobrusky et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050040825 | Sellers et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050050846 | Surace et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050080193 | Wouters et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050103568 | Sapoval et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050130541 | Shah | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050136276 | Borup et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060048682 | Wagh et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060057345 | Surace et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060059806 | Gosling et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060108175 | Tinianov et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060124388 | Pompei | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060260272 | Swiszcz et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070094950 | Surace et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070102237 | Baig | May 2007 | A1 |
20070107350 | Surace et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070175173 | Babineau, Jr. et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080251198 | Tinianov | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080264721 | Tinianov et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090000245 | Tinianov et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090000866 | Tinianov | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090004448 | Tinianov | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090107059 | Kipp et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090239429 | Kipp et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090280356 | Tinianov et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100047461 | Colbert | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100116405 | Kipp et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100170746 | Restuccia et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100230206 | Tinianov | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110061324 | Tinianov | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110165429 | Tinianov et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2219785 | Oct 1996 | CA |
2134439 | May 1993 | CN |
1358684 | Jul 2002 | CN |
1358684 | Jul 2002 | CN |
1894474 | Jan 2007 | CN |
0412816 | Feb 1991 | EP |
1154087 | Nov 2001 | EP |
1388836 | Feb 2004 | EP |
2-117825 | May 1990 | JP |
06-250669 | Sep 1994 | JP |
07-506158 | Jul 1995 | JP |
08-156173 | Jun 1996 | JP |
09-203153 | Aug 1997 | JP |
09203153 | Aug 1997 | JP |
10-054096 | Feb 1998 | JP |
11-219186 | Aug 1999 | JP |
2001-522751 | Nov 2001 | JP |
2002-164690 | Jun 2002 | JP |
2002-520544 | Jul 2002 | JP |
2003-071834 | Mar 2003 | JP |
9321402 | Oct 1993 | WO |
WO 9634261 | Oct 1996 | WO |
WO 9719033 | May 1997 | WO |
9924290 | May 1999 | WO |
0002204 | Jan 2000 | WO |
WO 0024690 | May 2000 | WO |
2007055835 | May 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
English Language Abstract, JP Patent First Publication No. 09-203153, Aug. 5, 1997, (2 pages). |
A Study of Techniques to Increase the Sound of Insulation of Building Elements, Wyle Laboratories, Prepared for Dept. of Housing and Urban Development, Jun. 1973 (16 pages). |
Field Sound Insulation Evaluation of Load-Beating Sandwich Panels for Housing, Final Report, Prepared by Robert E. Jones, Forest Products Laboratory, Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Aug. 1975 (53 pages). |
Sound Studio Construction on A Budget, F. Alton Evererst, McGraw-Hill, 1997 (7 pages). |
Wood Handbook/Wood as an Engineering Material, United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-113, Mar. 1999 (24 pages). |
Transmission Loss of Plasterboard Walls by T. D. Northwood, Building Research Note, Division of Building Research, National Research Counsel, Ottawa, Canada (10 pages). |
A Guide to Airborne, Impact, and Structureborne Noise Control in Multifamily Dwellings, U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Prepared for the National Bureau of Standards, Washington, D. C., Jan. 1963 (5 pages). |
Transmission Loss of Leaded Building Materials, Paul B. Ostergaard, Richmond L. Cardinell, and Lewis S. Goodfriend, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 35, No. 6, Jun. 1963 (7 pages). |
Dictionary of Architecture & Construction 2200 illustrations, Third Edition, Edited by Cyril M. Harris, Professor Emeritus of Architecture Columbia University, McGraw-Hill, 2000 (7 pages). |
Dictionary of Engineering Materials, Harald Keller, Uwe Erb, Wiley-Interscience by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2004 (4 pages). |
Chamber Science and Technology Dictionary, by Professor Peter M. B. Walker, W & R Chambers Ltd and Cambridge University Press, 1988 (3 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jan. 15, 2009. |
Noise and Vibration Control Engineering: Principles and Applications, Edited by Leo Beranek and Instvan Ver, Chapter 11, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1002, (12 pages). |
Handbook of Acoustical Measurements and Noise Control, Edited by Cyril Harris, Chapter 32; Structureborne Sound Isolation, Chapter 33; Noise Control in Buildings, McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1991, (36 pages). |
“Green Glue is your soundproofing solution and noise reduction material”, www.greengluecompany.com (2 pages). |
Acoustical: A Sound Approach to Testing, www.archest.com/pages (2 pages). |
STC—Sound Transmission Class—Discussion and Use, www.sota.ca/stc—info.htm (3 pages). |
ASTM International, Designation: C 1396/C 1396M-04, Standard Specification for Gypsum Board (7 pages). |
Barbara C. Lippiatt, National Institute of Standards and Technology. BEES 3.0, “Building for Environmental and Economic Sustainability Technical Manual and User Guide”, Oct 2002, (198 pages). |
Takada, et al., Effect in Reducing Floor Impact Noise of Recycled Paper Damper Members, Bulletin of Tokyo Metropolitan Industrial Technology Research Institute, No. 2 (1999) [certified English translation] (13 pages). |
Architectural Acoustics, M. David Egan, J. Ross Publishing (Reprint 2007) p. 211; originally published McGraw-Hill, 1988 (5 pages). |
Hastings, Mardi C.; Godfrey, Richard; Babcock, G. Madison, Application of Small Panel Damping Measurements to Larger Walls, Proc. SPIE vol. 2720, p. 70-76, Smart Structures and Materials 1996: Passive Damping and Isolation (7 pages). |
van Vuure, A. W.; Verpoest, I., Ko, F.K., Sandwich-Fabric Panels as Spacers in a Constrained Layer Structural Damping Application, Composites Part B 32 (2001) 11-19, Elsevier Science Ltd. (9 pages). |
Noise and Vibration Control, Revised Edition, pp. 306-315, Institute of Noise Control Engineering, 1988, Beranek, Leo L. (editor) (9 pages). |
Noise and Vibration Control, Chapter Fourteen, Damping of Panels, Ungar, Eric E., pp. 434-473, McGraw-Hill, 1971, Beranek, Leo L. (editor) (7 pages). |
Noise and Vibration Control Engineering, Principles and Application, pp. 466-479, John Wiley & Sons, 1992, Beranek, Leo L. and Ver, Istvan L. (editors) (9 pages). |
Nashif, Ahid D.; Jones, David I. G.; Henderson, John P., Vibration Damping, pp. 290-305, John Wiley & Sons, 1985 (18 pages). |
Architectural Acoustics, Principles and Practice, John Wiley & sons, 1992, Cavanaugh, William J. and Wilkes, Joseph A. (editors) (332 pages). |
FIRE Resistance Design Manual, Sound Control, Gypsum Association, GA-600-94 (14th Ed.) (107 pages). |
FIRE Resistance Design Manual, Sound Control, Gypsum Association, GA-600-97 (15th Ed.) (120 pages). |
FIRE Resistance Design Manual, Sound Control, Gypsum Association, GA-600-2000 (16th Ed.) (139 pages). |
Noxon, Arthur M., The Chain Is as Strong as its Weakest Link, An article written for the first Hong Long HiFi Show, 1993, Translated and Published in Chinese, http://www.acousticsciences.com/articles/chain.htm (7 pages). |
Quiet Lightweight Floor Systems, Reprint from Sound and Vibration Magazine, Jul. 1992, by David A. Harris, Building & Acoustic Design Consultants (7 pages). |
Joyal, Brian, Constrained-Layer Systems Provide Weight-Efficient, High Level Damping (4 pages). |
Dynamat materials http://web.archive.org/web/20010525113753/www.admteschusa.com/Dynamat.html Jun. 12, 2007, ADM Tech—Dynamic Control (15 pages). |
Noise Killer: Pro Damping Compound Materials http://www.tnt-audio.com/clinica/noise.html May 18, 2007, 1998 (3 pages). |
Waybackmachine search results for Jan 1, 1996—Jun. 12, 2007 (1 page). |
Frankovich, David, The Four-Fold Method of Noise and Vibration Control (8 pages). |
Renninger, Jennifer, Understanding Damping Techniques for Noise and Vibration Control (8 pages). |
Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC) Noise and Vibration Control, UFC 3-450-01. 15 May 200, Department of Defense (156 pages). |
United States Gypsum, Architectural and Construction Services, Design Data for Acousticians, Feb. 1986 (4 pages). |
A Study of Techniques to Increase the Sound of Insulation of Building Elements, Wyle Laboratories, Prepared for Dept. of Housing and Urban Development, Jun. 1973 (12 pages). |
dB-Ply materials Sound Reducing Panels from Greenwood Forest Products, Inc., Apr. 24, 1997 (9 pages). |
dB-Rock materials OMNI Products, Inc. (3 pages). |
ASC WallDamp materials from Acoustic Sciences Corporation http://web.archive.org/web/20021013031149/www.asc-soundproof.com/index-walldamp . . . May 18, 2007 (21 pages). |
Sounddown Viscoelastic Glue DG-A2, Soundown Corporation (2 pages). |
Nordisk Akustik A/S materials, http://web.archive.org/web/200206240933724/www.nordisk-akustik.dk/html—uk/prod03.ht . . . Jun. 11, 2007 (4 pages). |
IES 2000 Dampening and Visocelastic Membranes (Jul. 2, 2003) Atlanta.com/product (pp. 1-6). |
Waybackmachine search results for Jan 1, 1996-May 3, 2006 (1 page). |
“Damping of plate flexural vibrations by means of viscoelastic laminae” by D. Ross, E.E. Ungar, and E.M. Kerwin—Structural Damping, Section III, ASME, 1959, New York (41 pages). |
Vandersall , H. L., “Intumescent Coating Systems, Their development and Chemistry” J. Fire & Flammability, vol. 2 (Apr. 1971) pp. 97-140 (45 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US10/36411 dated Jul. 27, 2010. |
M.N. Darrouj et al., “Optimum Design of Constrained Layer Damping Panels”, Materials & Design, vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 202-208, Jul.-Aug. 1989. |
Z. Xie et al., “An enhanced beam model for constrained layer damping and a parameter study of damping contribution”, Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 319, Issues 3-5, pp. 1271-1284, Jan. 23, 2009. |
G. Lepoittevin et al., “Optimization of segmented constrained layer damping with mathematical programming using strain energy analysis and modal data”, Materials & Design, vol. 31, Issue 1, pp. 14-24, Jan. 2010. |
D.I.G. Jones, Handbook of Viscoelastic Vibration Damping, John Wiley and Sons, pp. 284-297, Aug. 2001. |
Pritz. “Loss Factor Peak of Viscoelastic Materials: Magnitude to Width Relations”, J. of Sound and Vibration, 246(2): 265-280, 2001. |
Creton, Costantino, “Pressure-Sensitive Adhesives: An Introductory Course”, MRS Bulletin, Jun. 2003, pp. 434-439. www.mrs.org/publications/bulletin. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion in corresponding International Application No. PCT/US08/68861 dated Sep. 5, 2008. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion in corresponding International Application No. PCT/US08/68863 dated Sep. 17, 2008. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion in corresponding International Application No. PCT/US08/68676 dated Sep. 25, 2008. |
Japanese Office Action dated May 12, 2009 for corresponding Japanese Application No. 2006-525373, English Translation. |
Japanese Office Action dated Dec. 22, 2009 for corresponding Japanese Application No. 2006-525373, English Translation. |
Chinese Office Action dated Dec. 26, 2008 for corresponding Chinese Application No. 200480032594.9, English Translation. |
Supplementary European Search Report dated Mar. 24, 2009 for corresponding European Application No. 04782564.1. |
Spec-Data Quiet Solution Datasheet, Reed Construction Data, (2005). |
Armstrong Basic Drywall Grid Installation Guide, http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.armstrong.com/common/c2002/content/files/4279.pdf. (Original Publication Date May 30, 2005, Retrieved Aug. 19, 2008). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion in corresponding International Application No. PCT/US08/59960 dated Aug. 1, 2008. |
www.acousticalsolutions.com/products/pdfs/install—green—glue.pdf. accessed Nov. 5, 2009. web date Jun. 19, 2006. |
Cheng et al. “Vibration Attenuation of Panel Structures by Optimally Shaped Viscoelastic Coating with Added Weight Considerations”. Thin-Walled Structures, 21 (1995), pp. 307-326. |
AVS Forum “Green Glue(R)”, http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/archive/index.php/t-456614-p-2.html. retrieved Jul. 19, 2010, 4 pages total. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US10/50272 dated Nov. 15, 2010. |
Wikipedia: the free encyclopedia, Hot-dip galvanizing, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galvanized—steel. |
Supplementary European Search Report, Application No. EP 06827584.1, dated Nov. 4, 2009. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US06/43247 dated Dec. 5, 2007. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US08/59540 dated Aug. 15, 2008. |
PCT International Search Report (ISR) and the Written Opinion mailed May 3, 2012, in related International Application No. PCT/US2012/022073. |
Chinese Office Action dated Feb. 23, 2012 for corresponding Chinese Application No. 200980115534.6, English Translation. |
PCT International Search Report (ISR) and the Written Opinion mailed Jul. 7, 2009, in related International Application No. PCT/US2009/043373. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080264721 A1 | Oct 2008 | US |