There is an increasing demand for communication devices capable of operating across a variety of different frequency bands. For example, there is an increasing demand for cellular or mobile telephones that can operate in multiple frequency bands. In such devices, separate transmit and receive filters are in general employed for each transmit and receive frequency band. In practice, bulk acoustic wave (BAW) filters, surface acoustic wave (SAW) filters, thin film bulk acoustic resonator (FBAR) filters and coupled resonator filters (CRF) may be employed in appropriate applications.
A typical implementation of an acoustic resonator comprises a layer of piezoelectric material arranged between two metal electrodes. Common piezoelectric materials include, for example, aluminum nitride (AlN) and zinc oxide (ZnO).
If an electric field is applied between first electrode T and second electrode B of acoustic resonator 10, the reciprocal or inverse piezoelectric effect will cause acoustic resonator 10 to mechanically expand or contract, the case of expansion or of contraction depending on the polarization of the piezoelectric material. This means that the opposite case applies if the electric field is inversely applied between the T and B electrodes. In the case of an alternating field, an acoustic wave is generated in piezo layer 12, and, depending on the implementation of acoustic resonator 10, this wave will propagate, for example, in parallel with the electric field, as a longitudinal wave, or, as a transversal wave, transverse to the electric field, and will be reflected, for example, at the interface of piezo layer 12. For longitudinal waves, whenever the thickness d of piezo layer 12 and of the top and bottom electrodes equals an integer multiple of half the wavelength λ of the acoustic waves, resonance states and/or acoustic resonance vibrations will occur. Because each acoustic material has a different propagation velocity for the acoustic wave the fundamental resonance frequency, i.e. the lowest resonance frequency FRES, will then be inversely proportional to weighted sum of all thicknesses of the resonator layers.
The piezoelectric properties and, thus, also the resonance properties of an acoustic resonator depend on various factors, e.g. on the piezoelectric material, the production method, the polarization impressed upon the piezoelectric material during manufacturing, and the size of the crystals. As has been mentioned above, it is the resonance frequency in particular which depends on total thickness of the resonator.
As noted above, acoustic resonators can be employed in electrical filters, and in particular in radio frequency (RF) and microwave filters. These resonators can be combined in various ways to produce a variety of filter configurations. One particular configuration is a coupled resonator filter (CRF) wherein a coupling layer combines the acoustic action of the two acoustic resonators, which leads to a bandpass filter transfer function.
In particular, as noted above, such filters are often employed in cellular or mobile telephones that can operate in multiple frequency bands. In such devices, it is important that a filter intended to pass one particular frequency band (“the passband”) should have a high level of attenuation at other nearby frequency bands which contain signals that should be rejected. Specifically, there may be one or more frequencies or frequency bands near the passband which contain signals at relatively high amplitudes that should be rejected by the filter. In such cases, it would be beneficial to be able to increase the filter's rejection characteristics at those particular frequencies or frequency bands, even if the rejection at other frequencies or frequency bands does not receive the same level of rejection.
What is needed, therefore, is an acoustic resonator filter structure having increased near-band rejection, and in particular exhibits increased rejection at specific desired frequencies. What is also needed is an acoustic resonator filter structure which can be designed to tune its attenuation characteristics to reject one or more desired frequencies or frequency ranges.
In an example embodiment, a signal processing device comprises: an input terminal adapted to receive an input signal; a first acoustic resonator having a first electrode, a second electrode, and a piezoelectric layer extending between the first and second electrodes of the first acoustic resonator, wherein the first electrode of the first acoustic resonator is connected to the input terminal; a second acoustic resonator having a first electrode, a second electrode, and a piezoelectric layer extending between the first and second electrodes of the second acoustic resonator; an acoustic coupling layer having a first side connected to the second electrode of the first acoustic resonator, and a second side opposite the first side connected to the first electrode of the second acoustic resonator, the acoustic coupling layer being adapted to couple acoustic energy from the first acoustic resonator to the second acoustic resonator; an output terminal connected to the second electrode of the second acoustic resonator; and a capacitor extending between the input terminal and the output terminal. A transmission path from the input terminal to the output terminal has a frequency response exhibiting a passband and a central passband frequency and at least two transmission zeros. The first transmission zero is at a frequency that is less than the central passband frequency and at least 10% of the central passband frequency, and the second transmission zero is at a frequency that is greater the central passband frequency and is no more than 1000% of the central passband frequency.
In another example embodiment, a radio frequency filter comprises: an input terminal; an output terminal; an acoustic coupling layer; a first acoustic resonator disposed between the input terminal and the acoustic coupling layer; a second acoustic resonator disposed between the acoustic coupling layer and the output terminal; and a capacitor extending between the input terminal and the output terminal.
In yet another example embodiment, a bandpass filter comprises a coupled resonator structure having a first acoustic resonator coupled to a second acoustic resonator by an acoustic coupling layer, the filter having a passband and a central passband frequency and at least two transmission zeros in its frequency response.
The example embodiments are best understood from the following detailed description when read with the accompanying drawing figures. It is emphasized that the various features are not necessarily drawn to scale. In fact, the dimensions may be arbitrarily increased or decreased for clarity of discussion. Wherever applicable and practical, like reference numerals refer to like elements.
In the following detailed description, for purposes of explanation and not limitation, example embodiments disclosing specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of an embodiment according to the present teachings. However, it will be apparent to one having ordinary skill in the art having had the benefit of the present disclosure that other embodiments according to the present teachings that depart from the specific details disclosed herein remain within the scope of the appended claims. Moreover, descriptions of well-known apparati and methods may be omitted so as to not obscure the description of the example embodiments. Such methods and apparati are clearly within the scope of the present teachings.
Device 300 may operate as a bandpass filter, receiving an input signal applied to the input terminal 305 connected to the first acoustic resonator 310, and providing a bandpass-filtered output signal at output terminal 355.
In one common application, a bandpass filter is employed in a cellular or mobile telephone. The mobile telephone may operate in one or more frequency bands. However at any given time, the mobile telephone may operate in the presence of a number of strong signals in nearby frequency bands. For proper operation of the mobile telephone, it is necessary for the bandpass filter to pass the signals in the frequency band on which the mobile telephone operates, while at the same time providing a high level of rejection of these signals on the nearby frequency bands.
The arrangement shown in
For example, consider an application where it is desirable to pass signals in a frequency band centered around 2.4 GHz, while rejecting signals at frequencies near 2.0 GHz and/or 2.8 GHz.
To address this shortcoming,
Device 500 includes input terminal 505, output terminal 555, a coupled resonator filter (CRF) 525, and a capacitor 550. CRF 525 includes a first acoustic resonator 510, a second acoustic resonator 520, and acoustic coupling layer 530.
First resonator 510 includes a first electrode 512, a second electrode 514, and a piezoelectric layer 516 extending between first and second electrodes 512 and 514. First electrode 512 is connected to input terminal 505. In one embodiment, first resonator 510 is a thin film bulk acoustic resonator (FBAR). In one embodiment, first and second electrodes 512 and 514 are made of molybdenum, and piezoelectric layer 516 is made of aluminum nitride (AlN).
Second resonator 520 includes a first electrode 522, a second electrode 524, and a piezoelectric layer 526 extending between first and second electrodes 522 and 524. Second electrode 524 is connected to output terminal 555. In one embodiment, second resonator 520 is a thin film bulk acoustic resonator (FBAR). In one embodiment, first and second electrodes 522 and 524 are made of molybdenum, and piezoelectric layer 526 is made of aluminum nitride (AlN).
Acoustic coupling layer 530 is provided between first resonator 510 and second acoustic resonator 520. Acoustic coupling layer 530 has a first side connected to second electrode 514 of first acoustic resonator 510, and has a second side opposite the first side connected to first electrode 522 of second acoustic resonator 520. Acoustic coupling layer 530 couples acoustic energy from first acoustic resonator 510 to second acoustic resonator 520. To facilitate this coupling, the acoustic impedance of acoustic coupling layer 530 is less than the acoustic impedance of second electrode 514 of first acoustic resonator 510, and is also less than the acoustic impedance of first electrode 522 of second acoustic resonator 520. In one embodiment, acoustic coupling layer 530 comprises a low dielectric constant (“low-k”) silicon material layer. For example, at frequencies of interest, acoustic coupling layer may have an acoustic impedance of <5 megarayls, for example 2-3 megarayls. In contrast, second electrode 514 of first acoustic resonator 510, and first electrode 522 of second acoustic resonator 520 (each of which may made of molybdenum, for example), may have an acoustic impedance of 65 megarayls. The high ratio of acoustic impedances between acoustic resonator electrodes 514/522 and acoustic coupling layer 530 facilitates coupling of acoustic energy between acoustic resonators 510 and 520 by acoustic coupling layer 530.
Capacitor 550 extends between input terminal 505 and output terminal 555. In other words, capacitor 550 extends between first electrode 512 of first acoustic resonator 510, and second electrode 524 of second acoustic resonator 520. As will be explained in greater detail below, capacitor 550 can be selected to provide a pair of transmission zeroes (or localized transmission minima) in the transmission frequency response of device 500.
Of particular benefit, in some embodiments capacitor 550 is small enough that it can be implemented in the layout of the CRF 525 itself and thus does not require an external element.
To better understand how the frequencies of the transmission zeros (or localized transmission minima) in the frequency response of signal processing device 500 are determined,
In
where Kt2≅0.065 and f0 is the central passband frequency of signal processing device 500;
θ and θ0 can be calculated as follows:
To facilitate the analysis of the electrical model of signal processing device 500,
It can be shown that the condition for a zero to occur in the transmission frequency response of signal processing device 500 is defined by equation (1):
Thus, if the B coefficient of the matrix
is negative and imaginary, then equation (3) will produce physically realizable (positive) values and the transmission minima can occur. When certain simplifying assumptions are made, it can be shown that the frequencies F1 and F2 of the first and second transmission zeros can be calculated as:
Thus, from equations (4) and (5) it can be seen that by proper selection of various parameters of first and second acoustic resonators 510 and 520, acoustic coupling layer 530, and capacitor 530, it is possible to place transmission zeros F1 and F2 (which may in practice appear as localized transmission minima) in the frequency response of signal processing device 500 at desired frequencies. In particular, it can be seen from equations (4) and (5) that most material parameters are fixed and the rest (except for Cp) are determined by the passband requirements (bandwidth, center frequency, etc) of the filter. Thus, the two transmission zeros F1 and F2 are not independent, but rather they move together when the value Cp changes.
In operation, device 500 may function as a bandpass filter. In that case, second electrode 514 of first acoustic resonator 510, and first electrode 522 of second acoustic resonator 520 are each connected to ground as shown in
In a particular embodiment, a first (lower frequency) transmission zero may be produced at a frequency that is less than the central passband frequency, and a second transmission zero may be produced at a frequency that is greater than the central passband frequency. In particular, it is often desirable to produce the “lower” transmission zero at a frequency that is at least 10% of the central passband frequency (thus, for example, excluding any transmission zero that may naturally occur at DC). It is also often desirable to produce the “upper” transmission zero at a frequency that is greater than 1000% of the central passband frequency (thus, for example, excluding any transmission zero that may theoretically occur at “infinite frequency”). So, for example, in a case where the central passband frequency is 2.0 GHz, then the frequency of the lower transmission zero in general should be greater than 200 MHz, and the frequency of the upper transmission zero in general should be less than 20 GHz. However these ranges are merely exemplary and not limiting.
While example embodiments are disclosed herein, one of ordinary skill in the art appreciates that many variations that are in accordance with the present teachings are possible and remain within the scope of the appended claims. The embodiments therefore are not to be restricted except within the scope of the appended claims.