This application is related to U.S. Provisional patent application Ser. No. 13/404,496, filed on Feb. 24, 2012, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
The present subject matter relates generally to hearing device components, and in particular to apparatus and method for mitigation of earwax, oil, moisture, debris, and other foreign material for hearing device components.
One of the recurring problems with a body-worn device having transducers (e.g., acoustic sensors) is the accumulation of material that might block the proper operation of the transducer. Hearing assistance devices that are body worn and which have one or more transducers frequently encounter an accumulation of moisture, wax or other foreign material that can occlude apertures for the transducers and cause damage to the transducers eventually. One example of a hearing assistance device is a hearing aid. Hearing assistance devices often include on or more acoustic sensors, such as a microphone or receiver. These acoustic sensors are exposed to unwanted substances, such as wax, debris, moisture, or vapor. Hearing assistance devices may include a barrier layer arranged to reduce the amount of unwanted substances that can reach the acoustic sensor. However, occlusion and other effects of the buildup of wax, moisture and other materials continue to be an issue with such devices.
What is needed in the art is an improved method or apparatus for manufacturing barrier layers that meet requirements for acoustical transparency, resistance, repellency, and other characteristics. Such method and apparatus should not only improve the longevity of the transducers, but also provide reduced occurrences of partial or full blockage of apertures used for sound reception by hearing assistance devices. Such method and apparatus will allow less foreign material through to the transducer.
Disclosed herein, among other things, are methods and apparatuses for providing a sealed and acoustically transparent barrier layer for mitigating foreign material buildup for hearing assistance device components.
The present subject matter includes a hearing assistance acoustically transparent barrier layer configured to resist accumulation and passage of foreign materials, wherein the barrier layer is acoustically transparent but prevents the accumulation and passage of unwanted materials. In various embodiments of the present subject matter, the barrier layer is a thin, low-density layer that is arranged around or on an exposed or open surface of an acoustic sensor. The barrier layer includes a membrane that is comprised of or coated with at least one of oleophobic and hydrophobic materials. The barrier layer neutral rest position is designed to move with its use environment changes, such as pressure or temperature, without introducing tension. In an embodiment, the balancing motion of sealed layer equalizes outside pressure with the internal pressure of sealed sensor(s) cavity, thereby reducing the need for pressure-equalizing leak path.
In one embodiment, where the ratio of internal volume of sealed cavity to barrier layer surface area is large, environmental changes require large motion for balancing motion of barrier layer. In such cases, slower environmental changes (e.g. hourly or daily static pressure variations) may be balanced by other or additional pressure balancing mechanisms. One such pressure balancing mechanism may include provision of leak passages through the capture frame of the barrier layer. The irregularities (e.g., “waviness”) in the contact surface of the barrier layer and the mating capture frame can provide a minute leak passage. Another pressure balancing mechanism may include the use of porous plastic material in the capture frame. One other pressure balancing mechanism may include a narrow passage in the capture frame, where the narrow passage does not affect capture frame integrity. Other aspects are provided without departing from the scope of the present subject matter.
This Summary is an overview of some of the teachings of the present application and not intended to be an exclusive or exhaustive treatment of the present subject matter. Further details about the present subject matter are found in the detailed description and appended claims. The scope of the present invention is defined by the appended claims and their legal equivalents.
The following detailed description of the present subject matter refers to subject matter in the accompanying drawings that show, by way of illustration, specific aspects and embodiments in which the present subject matter may be practiced. These embodiments are described in sufficient detail to enable those skilled in the art to practice the present subject matter. References to “an,” “one,” or “various” embodiments in this disclosure are not necessarily to the same embodiment, and such references contemplate more than one embodiment. The following detailed description is demonstrative and not to be taken in a limiting sense. The scope of the present subject matter is defined by the appended claims, along with the full scope of legal equivalents to which such claims are entitled.
The present subject matter includes method and apparatus for preventing moisture, earwax, and other foreign materials from entering into a transducer (including, but not limited to, a microphone or receiver) of a hearing assistance device. The following examples will be provided for a hearing aid, which is only one type of hearing assistance device. It is understood however, that the disclosure is not limited to hearing aids and that the teachings provided herein can be applied to a variety of hearing assistance devices.
Different embodiments are provided in which a barrier layer configuration is used to protect the receiver and to reduce the effects of wax, moisture, and other unwanted substances. The present subject matter is demonstrated for hearing assistance devices, including hearing aids, including but not limited to, behind-the-ear (BTE), in-the-ear (ITE), in-the-canal (ITC), receiver-in-canal (RIC) or receiver-in-the-ear (RITE), completely-in-the-canal (CIC) type hearing aids, and deep insertion devices having a transducer, such as a receiver or microphone, whether custom fitted, standard, open fitted or occlusive fitted. The present subject matter can be used with any device having an acoustic transducer, and especially one configured to be placed in or proximal the ear canal of a wearer.
In order to shield acoustic sensors, barrier layers must meet several resistance and repellency requirements, and the barrier layer must be non-rigid, moveable, thin, lightweight, and stretch-resistant. To meet requirements and exhibit required characteristics, existing methods of creating barrier layers encounter several obstacles, including heat bonding, pressure leakage path, barrier resistance, and strain.
The present barrier prevents earwax, oils, moisture, and other foreign materials from reaching the transducer and causing damage. Therefore, this device will reduce repairs and warranty costs. Owners will not have to replace the barriers as frequently as other designs.
One aspect of the present subject matter is that in certain embodiments it provides a barrier to divert unwanted substances such as earwax, oils, moisture, and other foreign materials before entering an aperture. For example, by placing the barrier at an inlet, unwanted substances are diverted from the microphone or receiver or other device attached to or within the aperture. Thus, in certain embodiments, the present subject matter acts to divert unwanted substances as opposed to trapping them. In various embodiments, the barrier is accessible for cleaning. In certain applications, the barrier may be wiped clean.
Thus, several approaches and combinations of oleophobic and/or hydrophobic coatings, aperture shape, location, and sizes can be performed to migrate foreign material in such devices. The examples provided herein are not intended in an exclusive or exhaustive sense.
In one embodiment of the present subject matter, an apparatus includes a plug for protecting an acoustic transducer having an acoustic aperture with a known cross section, including a first portion that is generally hollow and elongate, the first portion having a shape substantially similar to the cross section geometry of the aperture of the acoustic transducer and configured to fit within the aperture of the acoustic transducer; and a second portion comprising a frame for capture of a substantially acoustically transparent thin film, the frame configured to be secured proximal to one end of the first portion, the frame configured to mechanically retain the film over at least a portion of the aperture of the acoustic transducer to maintain the film at a desired relaxed geometry to allow for free movement of the film, wherein the first portion and the second portion are shaped to be disposed within the aperture of the acoustic transducer and thereby retain the film to form an acoustically transparent plug with a barrier that prevents passage of foreign materials into the aperture to protect the acoustic transducer.
In some variations, the frame is configured in two pieces that mate to capture the film. In some embodiments, the plug includes two pieces that are configured to snap together, or the plug includes two pieces that are configured to mate using a compression fit. In some embodiments, the plug includes at least a portion of the frame that is made from an adhesive tape. In some embodiments, the plug includes at least a portion of the frame that is made from plastic, where the plug plastic may be porous plastic. In some embodiments, at least one of the two pieces that snap together is plastic, where the plastic of the two pieces that snap together may be porous plastic. In some embodiments, at least one of the two pieces that mate using a compression fit is plastic, where the plastic of the two pieces that mate using a compression fit may be porous plastic. In some embodiments, at least a portion of the plug includes hydrophobic materials, or at least a portion of the plug includes oleophobic materials. In some embodiments, the plug or two pieces may be made of one or more other materials.
In one embodiment of the present subject matter, a method for thin film capture for an acoustically transparent plug for a transducer includes cutting an acoustically transparent thin film; disposing the thin film within a capture frame; deforming the thin film; and capturing the thin film on the capture frame. The capturing the thin film on the capture frame may achieve a desired relaxed geometry to allow for free movement of the thin film, reduce accumulation of foreign materials, or reduce passage of foreign materials to a transducer when the capture frame is secured to an acoustic aperture of the transducer.
In some embodiments, the cutting includes mechanical cutting, heat cutting, ultrasonic cutting, or laser cutting. In some embodiments, the bonding includes mechanical snap fitting of the frame to capture the thin film, or friction fitting of the frame to capture the thin film. In some embodiments, the bonding includes RF bonding, ultrasonic bonding, or injection molding bonding. In some variations, the captured thin film is thermoplastic material, a thermoset material, or an elastomeric material. In some variations, the captured thin film is a blend of a thermoplastic material, a thermoset material, or an elastomeric material. In some variations, the thin film is loosely bonded to the substrate. In some variations, the thin film has predefined slack relative to a taut plane. In some embodiments, the thin film is metallic, such as using an aluminum film. In some variations, the thin film is coated with a metal, coated with a hydrophobic material, or coated with an oleophobic material. In some embodiments, the thin film is coated with a color-changing layer to indicate presence of oil or moisture, such that a visual observation of the film coating color may indicate that the film should be cleaned. In some embodiments, the thin film is a graphic material such as grapheme, and may exhibit characteristics such as low density or high strength. In some embodiments, the thin film may be made of one or more other materials.
The present subject matter is demonstrated for hearing assistance devices, including hearing aids, including but not limited to, behind-the-ear (BTE), in-the-ear (ITE), in-the-canal (ITC), receiver-in-canal (RIC), or completely-in-the-canal (CIC) type hearing aids. It is understood that behind-the-ear type hearing aids may include devices that reside substantially behind the ear or over the ear. Such devices may include hearing aids with receivers associated with the electronics portion of the behind-the-ear device, or hearing aids of the type having receivers in the ear canal of the user, including but not limited to receiver-in-canal (RIC) or receiver-in-the-ear (RITE) designs. The present subject matter can also be used for devices with transducers generally, such as receivers for cochlear implant type hearing devices and such as deep insertion devices having a transducer, such as a receiver or microphone, whether custom fitted, standard, open fitted, or occlusive fitted. It is understood that other hearing assistance devices not expressly stated herein may be used in conjunction with the present subject matter.
This application is intended to cover adaptations or variations of the present subject matter. It is to be understood that the above description is intended to be illustrative, and not restrictive. The scope of the present subject matter should be determined with reference to the appended claims, along with the full scope of legal equivalents to which such claims are entitled.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4879750 | Nassler | Nov 1989 | A |
4972488 | Weiss et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4987597 | Haertl | Jan 1991 | A |
5864628 | Posen et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
6068911 | Shouji et al. | May 2000 | A |
6134333 | Flagler | Oct 2000 | A |
6164409 | Berger | Dec 2000 | A |
6212283 | Fletcher et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6310961 | Oliveira et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6449373 | Baker | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6671381 | Lux-Wellenhof | Dec 2003 | B1 |
7267847 | Karamuk | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7313245 | Shennib | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7372973 | Meier | May 2008 | B2 |
7401679 | Ipsen | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7443992 | Fideler | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7499561 | Hanses et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7551747 | Huynh et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7751579 | Schulein et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7773764 | Niederdrank | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7983434 | Röhrlein | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8416974 | Ammitzboll et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
9369816 | Yoong et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
20030035917 | Hyman | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030196687 | Campbell et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030198360 | Niederdrank | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040179709 | Niederdraenk et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050018866 | Schulein et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050084122 | Norris | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050141738 | Karamuk | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20070047752 | Wagner et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20080200779 | Zimmerling et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080240479 | Linford | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080310660 | Lin | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090154747 | Vestergaard et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20100322452 | Ladabaum et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110015063 | Gil | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110182452 | Lin | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20120219167 | Yoong | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120237065 | Higgins et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20140168864 | Lin | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20150382118 | Vaishya | Dec 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1432281 | Jun 2004 | EP |
1432285 | Jun 2004 | EP |
1458217 | Sep 2004 | EP |
2003929 | Dec 2008 | EP |
2003931 | Dec 2008 | EP |
2493216 | Aug 2012 | EP |
2501159 | Sep 2012 | EP |
61203800 | Sep 1986 | JP |
WO-1993012626 | Jun 1993 | WO |
WO-1999048328 | Sep 1999 | WO |
WO-2003094574 | Nov 2003 | WO |
WO-2004104116 | Dec 2004 | WO |
WO-2007005852 | Jan 2007 | WO |
WO-2007005866 | Jan 2007 | WO |
WO-2008025355 | Mar 2008 | WO |
WO-2008080397 | Jul 2008 | WO |
WO-2008154954 | Dec 2008 | WO |
WO-0103468 | Jan 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/404,496, Advisory Action dated Jan. 28, 2014”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/404,496, Response filed Jan. 29, 2014 to Advisory Action dated Jan. 28, 2014 and Final Office Action dated Oct. 29, 2013”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/404,496, Response filed Dec. 30, 2013 to Final Office Action dated Oct. 29, 2013”, 8 pgs. |
Boersma, Paul, “Accurate Short-Term Analysis of the Fundamental Frequency and the Harmonics-to-Noise Ratio of a Sampled Sound”, Institute of Phonetic Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Proceedings 17, (1993), 97-110. |
Chou, Wen-Sheng, et al., “A binaural algorithm for space and pitch detection”, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), (2011), 4976-4979. |
Mitre, Adriano, et al., “Accurate and Efficient Fundamental Frequency Determination from Precise Partial Estimates”, Proceedings of the 4th AES Brazil Conference, (2006), 113-118. |
Noll, A. Michael, “Pitch Determination of Human Speech by the Harmonic Product Spectrum, the Harmonic Sum Spectrum and a Maximum Likelihood Estimate”, Proceedings of the Symposium on Computer Processing in Communications, vol. XIX, Polytechnic Press: Brooklyn, New York, (1970), 779-797. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/404,496, Advisory Action dated May 13, 2015”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/404,496, Advisory Action dated Aug. 20, 2014”, 2 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/404,496, Examiner Interview Summary dated Aug. 21, 2014”, 2 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/404,496, Final Office Action dated Jun. 3, 2014”, 16 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/404,496, Final Office Action dated Dec. 31, 2014”, 17 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/404,496, Non Final Office Action dated Feb. 13, 2014”, 16 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/404,496, Non Final Office Action dated Jun. 23, 2015”, 18 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/404,496, Non Final Office Action dated Sep. 18, 2014”, 17 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/404,496, Response filed Apr. 30, 2015 to Final Office Action dated Dec. 31, 2014”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/404,496, Response filed May 13, 2014 to Non Final Office Action dated Feb. 13, 2014”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/404,496, Response filed Aug. 4, 2014 to Final Office Action dated Jun. 3, 2014”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/404,496, Response filed Sep. 3, 2014 to Advisory Action dated Aug. 20, 2014”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/404,496, Response filed Dec. 18, 2014 to Non Final Office Action dated Sep. 8, 2014”, 9 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 14176621.2, Extended European Search Report dated Jan. 16, 2015”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/404,496, Final Office Action dated Oct. 30, 2015”, 18 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/404,496, Response filed Jan. 29, 2016 to Final Office Action dated Oct. 30, 2015”, 10 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 14176621.2, Extended European Search Report Response filed Aug. 20, 2015 to dated Jan. 16, 2015”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/404,496, Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 9, 2016”, 7 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 14176621.2, Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC dated Jun. 14, 2018”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/138,267 , Response filed Jan. 11, 2013 to Final Office Action dated Oct. 11, 2012”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/138,267 , Response filed Mar. 9, 2012 to Final Office Action dated Dec. 9, 2011”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/138,267 , Response filed Sep. 25, 2012 to Non Final Office Action dated Apr. 25, 2012”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/138,267, Advisory Action dated Jan. 24, 2013”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/138,267, Advisory Action dated Mar. 21, 2012”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/138,267, Final Office Action dated Oct. 11, 2012”, 17 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/138,267, Final Office Action dated Dec. 9, 2011”, 16 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/138,267, Non Final Office Action dated Apr. 25, 2012”, 16 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/138,267, Non Final Office Action dated Jun. 30, 2011”, 16 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/138,267, Response filed Sep. 30, 2011 to Non-Final Office Action dated Jun. 30, 2011”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/980,672, Final Office Action dated Feb. 22, 2013”, 21 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/980,672, Non Final Office Action dated Sep. 28, 2012”, 17 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/980,672, Response filed May 22, 2013 to Final Office Action dated Feb. 22, 2013”, 12 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/980,672, Response filed Dec. 28, 2012 to Non Final Office Action dated Sep. 28, 2012”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/404,496, Final Office Action dated Oct. 29, 2013”, 14 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/404,496, Non Final Office Action dated Apr. 16, 2013”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/404,496, Preliminary Amendment dated May 14, 2012”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/404,496, Response filed Jul. 16, 2013 to Non Final Office Action dated Apr. 16, 2013”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/408,826, Non Final Office Action dated May 28, 2013”, 10 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 08252008.1, Extended European Search Report dated Dec. 6, 2010”, 10 Pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 08252008.1, Office Action dated Oct. 27, 2011”, 5 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 08252008.1, Response filed Jul. 1, 2011 to Extended European Search Report dated Dec. 6, 2010”, 6 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 08252008.1, Response filed Feb. 28, 2012 to Office Action dated Oct. 27, 2011”, 10 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 10252241.4, Extended Search Report Response filed Jan. 27, 2012”, 11 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 10252241.4; Search Report dated Mar. 31, 2011”, 7 Pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150016648 A1 | Jan 2015 | US |