1. Technical Field
Embodiments of the subject matter disclosed herein generally relate to methods and systems and, more particularly, to mechanisms and techniques for generating an acquisition scheme for vibroseis marine sources.
2. Discussion of the Background
Reflection seismology is a method of geophysical exploration to determine the properties of a portion of a subsurface layer in the earth, which information is especially helpful in the oil and gas industry. Marine reflection seismology is based on the use of a controlled source that sends energy waves into the earth. By measuring the time it takes for the reflections to come back to plural receivers, it is possible to estimate the depth and/or composition of the features causing such reflections. These features may be associated with subterranean hydrocarbon deposits.
For marine applications, seismic sources are essentially impulsive (e.g., compressed air is suddenly allowed to expand). One of the most used sources are airguns. The airguns produce a high amount of acoustics energy over a short time. Such a source is towed by a vessel either at the water surface or at a certain depth. The acoustic waves from the airguns propagate in all directions. A typical frequency range of the acoustic waves emitted by the impulsive sources is between 6 and 300 Hz. However, the frequency content of the impulsive sources is not fully controllable and different sources are selected depending on the needs of a particular survey. In addition, the use of impulsive sources can pose certain safety and environmental concerns.
Thus, another class of sources that may be used are vibratory sources. Vibratory sources, including hydraulically powered sources and sources employing piezoelectric or magnetostrictive material, have been used in marine operations. However, there is no large scale use of such sources as they have limited power and are not reliable due to the number of moving parts required to generate the seismic waves. A positive aspect of the vibratory sources is that they can generate signals over various frequency bands, commonly referred to as “frequency sweeps”. The frequency band of such sources may be better controlled compared to impulsive sources. However, the known vibratory sources do not have a high vertical resolution as the typical frequency range of a marine seismic source represents approximately four octaves. A few examples of such sources are now discussed.
The vibratory sources need to be spatially arranged, when towed, so that they reasonably cover the subsurface desired to be investigated and also provide a high energy output so that the receivers are able to record the reflected seismic waves. Various arrangements are known in the art for impulsive sources that may also be used for the vibratory sources. For example,
With this arrangement, the cross-line bin size is half the cross-line distance 42 between two consecutive streamers. It is noted that the streamers are typically placed 100 m from each other. The inline bin size may be much smaller as it depends mainly on the separation between the receivers in the streamer itself, which may be around 12 to 15 m. Thus, it is desired to decrease the cross-line bin size. With a cross-line bin size in the order of 50 m, aliasing effects may be produced, especially for the highest frequencies as the maximum bin size is inversely proportional to the frequency.
A common technique for reducing the cross-line bin size is the flip-flop acquisition scheme. In this mode, the vessel tows two sources 20 and 20′ as shown in
However, due to the particulars of the vibro-acoustic sources, there are additional acquisition schemes, not applicable to impulsive sources, that can be used to increase the performances of the acquisition as discussed next.
According to one exemplary embodiment, there is an incoherent acquisition method for driving vibrational source arrays under water. The method includes a step of towing with a vessel a first source array and a second source array underwater, wherein the first source array includes plural first individual source elements and the second source array includes plural first individual source elements; and a step of activating simultaneously the first source array and the second source array so that incoherent coded driving signals drive the first and second source arrays.
According to still another exemplary embodiment, there is a control mechanism configured to implement an incoherent acquisition method for driving vibrational source arrays under water. The control mechanism includes a processor configured to activate simultaneously a first source array and a second source array so that incoherent coded driving signals drive the first and second source arrays. The first source array includes plural first individual source elements and the second source array includes plural first individual source elements.
According to yet another exemplary embodiment, there is a coherent acquisition method for driving vibrational source arrays under water. The method includes a step of towing with a vessel high-frequency first and second source arrays and a low-frequency source array underwater, wherein the high-frequency first and second source arrays include plural high-frequency individual source elements and the low-frequency source array includes plural low-frequency individual source elements; a step of activating simultaneously the high-frequency first source array and the high-frequency second source array so that incoherent coded driving signals drive the high-frequency first and second source arrays; and a step of activating simultaneously the plural low-frequency individual source elements of the low-frequency source array so that coherent coded driving signals drive the low-frequency individual source elements.
According to still another exemplary embodiment, there is a control mechanism configured to implement a coherent acquisition method for driving vibrational source arrays under water. The control mechanism includes a processor configured to, activate simultaneously a high-frequency first source array and a high-frequency second source array so that incoherent coded driving signals drive the high-frequency first and second source arrays; and activate simultaneously plural low-frequency individual source elements of a low-frequency source array so that coherent coded driving signals drive the low-frequency individual source elements. The first and second source arrays include plural high-frequency individual source elements.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of the specification, illustrate one or more embodiments and, together with the description, explain these embodiments. In the drawings:
a to 4d are schematic diagrams of an incoherent acquisition scheme according to an exemplary embodiment;
a and 5b are schematic diagrams of a coherent acquisition scheme according to an exemplary embodiment;
a and 7b illustrate another coherent acquisition scheme according to an exemplary embodiment;
a and 8b illustrate various arrangements of individual source elements in a source array;
The following description of the exemplary embodiments refers to the accompanying drawings. The same reference numbers in different drawings identify the same or similar elements. The following detailed description does not limit the invention. Instead, the scope of the invention is defined by the appended claims. The following embodiments are discussed, for simplicity, with regard to the terminology and structure of a vibroseis acoustic source array. However, the embodiments to be discussed next are not limited to this structure, but may be applied to other arrays or sources that generate a seismic wave having a controlled frequency range.
Reference throughout the specification to “one embodiment” or “an embodiment” means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with an embodiment is included in at least one embodiment of the subject matter disclosed. Thus, the appearance of the phrases “in one embodiment” or “in an embodiment” in various places throughout the specification is not necessarily referring to the same embodiment. Further, the particular features, structures or characteristics may be combined in any suitable manner in one or more embodiments.
According to an exemplary embodiment, there are at least two source arrays, each array having two or more individual source elements. The source arrays are operated (i) simultaneously and incoherently with coded driving signals or (ii) simultaneously and coherently. By operating the source arrays simultaneously and incoherently, a total energy output is doubled relative to a conventional source array using a flip-flop acquisition scheme. By operating the source arrays simultaneously and coherently, a total energy output quadruples relative to a conventional source array using a flip-flop acquisition scheme. In one application, each source array is made up of two sub-arrays. A first sub-array may include individual source elements optimized for a first frequency range (e.g., low-frequency range, between 2 and 32 Hz) and a second sub-array may include individual source elements optimized for a second frequency range (e.g., high-frequency range, between 32 and 128 Hz). A larger number of sub-arrays or different frequencies are also possible.
Before discussing a novel acquisition scheme, an example of a source element is now discussed. It is noted that this one possible source element and the novel acquisition scheme may be applied to different source elements (e.g., any vibro-acoustic source element). According to an exemplary embodiment, an individual source element is illustrated in
The size and configuration of the electro-magnetic actuators depend on the acoustic output of the individual source element.
In order to provide the pistons 130 and 132 with the ability to move relative to the enclosure 120 in order to generate the seismic waves, a sealing mechanism 160 is provided between the pistons and the enclosure. The sealing mechanism 160 may be configured to slide back and forth with the pistons. The sealing mechanism 160 may be made of an elastomeric material, or may be a metallic flexible structure. In another application, the sealing mechanism 160 may be a gas or liquid seal. A gas seal (air bearing seal) is configured to inject a gas at the interface between the enclosure and the pistons to prevent the ambient water from entering the enclosure. A liquid seal may use, e.g., a ferromagnetic fluid, at the interface between the enclosure and the pistons to prevent the ambient water from entering the enclosure. Other seals may be used as will be recognized by those skilled in the art.
The embodiment shown in
The pneumatic mechanism 170 may be fluidly connected to a pressure source (not shown) on the vessel towing the individual source element 100. The pneumatic mechanism 170 may also be configured to provide an additional force on the pistons 130 and 132, e.g., at lower frequencies, to increase an acoustic output of the individual source element and also to extend a frequency spectrum of the individual source element.
The embodiment illustrated in
In one application, heat is generated by the actuation system 140. This heat may affect the motion of the shafts and/or the functioning of the actuator system. For this reason, a cooling system 194 may be provided at the individual source element. The cooling system 194, as will be discussed later, may be configured to transfer heat from the actuator system 140 to the ambient 150.
The pistons 130 and 132 are desired to generate an output having a predetermined frequency spectrum. To control this output, a local control system 200 may be provided, inside, outside or both relative to the enclosure 120. The local control system 200 may be configured to act in real-time to correct the output of the individual source element 100. As such, the local control system 200 may include one or more processors and sensors that monitor the status of the individual source element 100 and provide commands for the actuator system 140 and/or the pneumatic mechanism 170.
The source arrays discussed above may be made up entirely of the individual source element illustrated in
According to an exemplary embodiment, an incoherent acquisition scheme is now discussed. This acquisition scheme is exemplified with reference to
a and 4b show each source array having two sub-arrays as the quality of the subsurface's image is better when having two sub-arrays. For example, the sub-arrays 340a and 340b may include high-frequency individual source elements and the sub-arrays 360a and 360b may include low-frequency individual source elements. The high-frequency individual source elements are towed at a first depth D1 while the low-frequency individual source elements are towed at a second depth D2, larger than D1.
As coded driving signals are applied to the vibrating individual source elements for emitting the seismic waves (acoustic waves for example), the individual source elements may be driven simultaneously and in an incoherent way. A driving signal may include but is not limited to a random noise, a frequency sweep, etc. A coded driving signal has a signature that can be recovered later, i.e., when the seismic wave are recorded, during a processing stage, the recorded waves may be separated based on the sources that emitted those waves. Driving the sources incoherently means that coded driving signals for source array 320a do not overlap (are not correlated) with coded driving signals for source array 320b. For these reasons, the recorded seismic waves (after reflection on the subsurface) can be recovered and separated during processing, for example, by using signature deconvolution or cross-correlation with a pilot. This is not possible for the airgun sources.
By driving the source arrays 320a and 320b simultaneously and incoherently with coded driving signals, the total energy emitted by the two source arrays is doubled (total energy output +3 dB) relative to the case that the sources are using a flip-flop acquisition scheme. A flip-flop acquisition scheme drives sources in a given pattern. For example, considering that it is possible to drive a source in modes A and B, by driving the source ABAB . . . or ABBABB . . . it is achieved a flip-flop acquisition scheme. It is noted that a source array may include a predetermined number of individual source elements, e.g., between 16 and 30. Other numbers of individual source elements are also possible. The term “simultaneously” indicates that all individual source elements of both the source array 320a and the source array 320b are driven at the same time. However, the term “incoherently” means that the individual source elements of the source array 320a have a content different from the individual source elements of the source array 320b. In other words, the individual source elements of the source array 320a all emit the same content and the individual source elements of the source array 320b all emit a different content and thus, any pair of sources, one from the source array 320a and one from the source array 320b have a different content.
In another exemplary embodiment, it is possible to drive simultaneously and incoherently only the sub-arrays 340a and 340b or only the sub-arrays 360a and 360b. In still another exemplary embodiment which is illustrated in
According to another exemplary embodiment a coherent acquisition scheme is now discussed. This acquisition scheme is exemplified with reference to
As the vibrating individual source elements use coded driving signals for emitting the seismic waves (acoustic waves for example), the high-frequency individual source elements may be driven simultaneously and in an incoherent way while the low-frequency individual source elements may be driven simultaneously and in a coherent way. That means that a content of the signals from source array 440a does not overlap with a content of the signals from source array 440b. For these reasons, the recorded seismic waves for the high-frequency spectrum (after reflection on the subsurface) can be recovered and separated during processing, for example, by using signature deconvolution or cross-correlation with a pilot. However, that is not the case now for the low-frequency spectrum as these individual source elements are driven by coherent driving signals.
This specific arrangement for the low and high-frequency individual source elements is made because the high-frequency spectrum is desired for accurately determining relative positions of the various layers and/or interfaces in the subsurface while the low-frequency spectrum does not affect the clarity of these features but provide the general background trend. Also, the maximum bin size to prevent aliasing depends on the frequency and the high frequencies sources need to be kept separated for this reason.
By driving the source arrays 440a and 440b simultaneously and incoherently with coded driving signals, the energy emitted by the two source arrays is doubled (total energy output +3 dB) relative to the case that the sources are using a flip-flop acquisition scheme. Further, by driving the individual source elements of the source array 460 simultaneously and coherently, the energy emitted by the low-frequency individual source elements quadruple (total energy output +6 dB) at a cost of a bigger bin size, which is acceptable for the low-frequencies because they can be interpolated.
As shown in
In another exemplary embodiment, it is possible to drive simultaneously and coherently the source arrays 440a and 440b in addition to the source array 460. In still another exemplary embodiment illustrated in
The incoherent and coherent acquisition schemes discussed above may be implemented in a control mechanism illustrated, for example, in
Any of the source arrays discussed above may include plural individual source elements. In this respect,
The acquisition schemes previously discussed may be implemented by the following methods. According to an exemplary embodiment illustrated in
According to another exemplary embodiment illustrated in
An example of a representative control system capable of carrying out operations in accordance with the exemplary embodiments discussed above is illustrated in
The exemplary control system 1100 suitable for performing the activities described in the exemplary embodiments may include server 1101. Such a server 1101 may include a central processor unit (CPU) 1102 coupled to a random access memory (RAM) 1104 and to a read-only memory (ROM) 1106. The ROM 1106 may also be other types of storage media to store programs, such as programmable ROM (PROM), erasable PROM (EPROM), etc. The processor 1102 may communicate with other internal and external components through input/output (I/O) circuitry 1108 and bussing 1110, to provide control signals and the like. For example, the processor 1102 may communicate with the sensors, electro-magnetic actuator system and/or the pneumatic mechanism. The processor 1102 carries out a variety of functions as is known in the art, as dictated by software and/or firmware instructions.
The server 1101 may also include one or more data storage devices, including hard and floppy disk drives 1112, CD-ROM drives 1114, and other hardware capable of reading and/or storing information such as a DVD, etc. In one embodiment, software for carrying out the above discussed steps may be stored and distributed on a CD-ROM 1116, diskette 1118 or other form of media capable of portably storing information. These storage media may be inserted into, and read by, devices such as the CD-ROM drive 1114, the disk drive 1112, etc. The server 1101 may be coupled to a display 1120, which may be any type of known display or presentation screen, such as LCD displays, plasma displays, cathode ray tubes (CRT), etc. A user input interface 1122 is provided, including one or more user interface mechanisms such as a mouse, keyboard, microphone, touch pad, touch screen, voice-recognition system, etc.
The server 1101 may be coupled to other computing devices, such as the equipment of a vessel, via a network. The server may be part of a larger network configuration as in a global area network (GAN) such as the Internet 1128, which allows ultimate connection to the various landline and/or mobile client/watcher devices.
As also will be appreciated by one skilled in the art, the exemplary embodiments may be embodied in a wireless communication device, a telecommunication network, as a method or in a computer program product. Accordingly, the exemplary embodiments may take the form of an entirely hardware embodiment or an embodiment combining hardware and software aspects. Further, the exemplary embodiments may take the form of a computer program product stored on a computer-readable storage medium having computer-readable instructions embodied in the medium. Any suitable computer readable medium may be utilized including hard disks, CD-ROMs, digital versatile discs (DVD), optical storage devices, or magnetic storage devices such a floppy disk or magnetic tape. Other non-limiting examples of computer readable media include flash-type memories or other known types of memories.
The disclosed exemplary embodiments provide a source array, computer software, and method for generating acquisition schemes for under water vibrational sources. It should be understood that this description is not intended to limit the invention. On the contrary, the exemplary embodiments are intended to cover alternatives, modifications and equivalents, which are included in the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims. Further, in the detailed description of the exemplary embodiments, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a comprehensive understanding of the claimed invention. However, one skilled in the art would understand that various embodiments may be practiced without such specific details.
Although the features and elements of the present exemplary embodiments are described in the embodiments in particular combinations, each feature or element can be used alone without the other features and elements of the embodiments or in various combinations with or without other features and elements disclosed herein.
This written description uses examples of the subject matter disclosed to enable any person skilled in the art to practice the same, including making and using any devices or systems and performing any incorporated methods. The patentable scope of the subject matter is defined by the claims, and may include other examples that occur to those skilled in the art. Such other examples are intended to be within the scope of the claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
11 59433 | Oct 2011 | FR | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3288243 | Silverman | Nov 1966 | A |
3331050 | Kilmer et al. | Jul 1967 | A |
3691516 | Graham et al. | Sep 1972 | A |
3885225 | Anstey et al. | May 1975 | A |
4030063 | Wallen | Jun 1977 | A |
4069470 | Cunningham et al. | Jan 1978 | A |
4159463 | Silverman | Jun 1979 | A |
4168485 | Payton et al. | Sep 1979 | A |
4188610 | Nelson | Feb 1980 | A |
4272226 | Osborne | Jun 1981 | A |
4295213 | Mifsud | Oct 1981 | A |
4391299 | Holmes | Jul 1983 | A |
4441174 | Ray et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
4514834 | Hanson et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4556963 | Hugus et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4636956 | Vannier et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4715020 | Landrum, Jr. | Dec 1987 | A |
4799201 | Nelson | Jan 1989 | A |
4823326 | Ward | Apr 1989 | A |
4885726 | Myers | Dec 1989 | A |
4953657 | Edington | Sep 1990 | A |
4969129 | Currie | Nov 1990 | A |
4982374 | Edington et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5062089 | Willard et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5128900 | Cole | Jul 1992 | A |
5199005 | Forsberg | Mar 1993 | A |
5410517 | Andersen | Apr 1995 | A |
5426618 | Chen et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5703833 | Allen | Dec 1997 | A |
5719821 | Sallas et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5721710 | Sallas et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5901112 | Walker | May 1999 | A |
5959939 | Tengham et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6028818 | Jeffryes | Feb 2000 | A |
6049507 | Allen | Apr 2000 | A |
6076629 | Tengham | Jun 2000 | A |
6076630 | Ambs | Jun 2000 | A |
6161076 | Barr et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6181646 | Bouroucos et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6253156 | Bui-Tran et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6327537 | Ikelle | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6366857 | Bird et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6370477 | Vermeer | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6464035 | Chelminski | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6545944 | de Kok | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6597632 | Khan | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6606958 | Bouyoucos | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6664788 | Hornbostel et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6687619 | Moerig et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6704245 | Becquey | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6714867 | Meunier | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6754590 | Moldoveanu | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6766256 | Jeffryes | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6807508 | Becquey | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6842701 | Moerig et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6942059 | Smith | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7257049 | Laws et al. | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7327633 | Bagaini et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7515505 | Krohn et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7551518 | Tenghamn | Jun 2009 | B1 |
7859945 | Sallas et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7881160 | Rouquette | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7974152 | Tenghamn | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8271173 | Wilmanowicz et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8339896 | van Borselen et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
20030176974 | Baliguet et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040089499 | Smith | May 2004 | A1 |
20070133354 | Bagaini et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20090251994 | Rouquette | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100118647 | Tenghamn | May 2010 | A1 |
20100232260 | Zowarka et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110038225 | Tenghamn | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110085416 | Sallas | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110085422 | Thompson et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110128818 | Eick et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110162906 | Harper et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110317515 | Tenghamn | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120188845 | Jeffryes | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120314536 | Bagaini | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130100764 | Ruet | Apr 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2 267 486 | Dec 2010 | EP |
2 183 834 | Jun 1987 | GB |
2259141 | Mar 1993 | GB |
2 280 032 | Jan 1995 | GB |
2 306 219 | Apr 1997 | GB |
8603015 | May 1986 | WO |
0116621 | Mar 2001 | WO |
2009077762 | Jun 2009 | WO |
2012123883 | Sep 2012 | WO |
2012170608 | Dec 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Great Britain Search Report in corresponding Great Britain Application No. 1215264.1 dated Dec. 5, 2012. |
Great Britain Search Report in corresponding Great Britain Application No. 1215276.5 dated Dec. 21, 2012. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority in corresponding International Application No. PCT/EP2012/067998 mailed Oct. 17, 2012. |
International Search Report in corresponding International Application No. PCT/EP2012/067998 mailed Oct. 17, 2012. |
William H. Dragoset, “Marine Vibrators and the Doppler Effect”. Geophysics, vol. 53., No. 11, Nov. 1989, pp. 1388-1398. |
Gary Hampson et al., “Effects of Source and Receiver Motion on Seismic Data”, Geophysical Prospecting vol. 43, Issue 2, Feb. 1995, pp. 221-244. |
J.E. Martin et al., Abstract of “Simultaneous Vibroseis Recording”, Geophysical Prospecting, vol. 41, Apr. 1993. |
Choon Byong Park et al., “Swept Impact Seismic Technique (SIST)”, Geophysics, vol. 61, No. 6, Nov.-Dec. 1996, pp. 1789-1803. |
William C. Pritchett, “An Example of Simultaneous Recording Where Necessary Signal Separation is Easily Achieved”, Geophysics, vol. 56, No. 1, Jan. 1991 pp. 9-17. |
E. Rietsch, “Vibroseis Signals With Prescribed Power Spectrum”, Geophysical Prospecting, vol. 25, Issue 4, Dec. 1977, pp. 614-620. |
Abd El-Aziz Khairy Abd El-Aal, “Harmonic by Harmonic Removal Technique for Improving Vibroseis Data Quality”, Geophysical Prospecting, vol. 59, Issue 2, Mar. 2011, pp. 279-294. |
E. Rietsch, “Computerized Analysis of Vibroseis Signal Similarity”, Geophysical Prospecting, vol. 25, Issue 3, Sep. 1977, pp. 541-552. |
Ulrich Polom, “Elimination of source-genrated noise from correlated vibroseis data (the ‘ghost-seep’ problem)”, Geophysical Prospecting, vol. 45, Issue 4, Jul. 1997, pp. 571-591. |
US Office Action mailed on Apr. 8, 2013, in related U.S. Appl. No. 13/677,661. |
US Office Action mailed on Mar. 25, 2013, in related U.S. Appl. No. 13/677,713. |
US Office Action mailed on May 9, 2013, in related U.S. Appl. No. 13/687,028. |
US Office Action mailed on Apr. 15, 2013, in related U.S. Appl. No. 13/687,084. |
Danish First Technical Examination mailed Jun. 4, 2013 with Search Report in related Application No. PA 2012 70503. |
US Office Action mailed May 29, 2013, in related U.S. Appl. No. 13/415,216. |
Danish First Technical Examination mailed Jun. 10, 2013 with Search Report in related Application No. PA 2012 70507. |
US Office Action mailed Aug. 26, 2013, in related U.S. Appl. No. 13/677,713. |
International Search Report in related International Application No. PCT/EP2012/067999, mailed Aug. 9, 2013 (All references cited in the ISR were previously provided to the USPTO in a prior IDS) (US 2009/0251994 issued as USP 7,881,160). |
Written Opinion in related International Application No. PCT/EP2012/067999, mailed Aug. 9, 2013. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130100765 A1 | Apr 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13415225 | Mar 2012 | US |
Child | 13687059 | US |