This invention relates to the carbonization of pitch-infiltrated fibrous preforms. Such pitch infiltrated fibrous preforms are manufactured into carbon-carbon composites having utility in such demanding applications as aircraft brake discs.
Carbonization of pitch-infiltrated fibrous preforms during the manufacture of carbon-carbon composites poses many difficulties. Among the difficulties are the phenomena that when the fibrous pitch-infiltrated preform is held in a constraint fixture during a carbonization process, (1) the pitch may bond the preform to the fixture, (2) unequal coefficients of thermal expansion between the preform and an adjacent wall of the constraint fixture may break or stress the preform, and (3) the pitch may foam during carbonization, causing backpressure from the constraint fixture which may break or stress the preform. US 2005/0093188 A1 discloses a method for making a carbon-carbon composite preform using e.g. a steel constraint fixture. The method disclosed therein is operative, but in some cases foaming of pitch causes untidiness in the carbonization furnace. Also, it is sometimes difficult to remove the preform from the constraint fixture due to unwanted bonding.
The present invention provides embodiments that overcome problems such as those discussed above. In one aspect of the present invention, a friable inert material such as activated carbon is placed between the preform and the constraint fixture. The activated carbon or other inert friable material adsorbs the pitch molecules that escape the preform during carbonization, which reduces problems with foaming. The layer of activated carbon or other friable material between the fibrous preform and the constraint fixture also provides an easily crushable region that facilitates removal of the preform from the constraint fixture after carbonization.
In one embodiment, this invention provides a method of carbonizing a pitch-infiltrated fibrous annular preform by: infiltrating the fibrous annular preform with pitch; placing the pitch-infiltrated annular fibrous preform in a constraint fixture having an ejector base plate, an inner wall, an outer wall, and a top press plate, the relative sizes of the preform and the constraint fixture being selected so that a layer of inert friable material may be situated between the preform and walls of the constraint fixture; placing inert friable material (e.g., activated carbon, typically having a bulk density of from 0.09 g/cc to 0.25 g/cc) between the preform and the top, bottom, and walls of the constraint fixture; and subjecting the pitch-infiltrated fibrous preform to carbonization in the constraint fixture. In the practice of this embodiment of the invention, the relative sizes of the preform and the constraint fixture may be selected to leave a gap of any convenient size (e.g., ⅛ inch to 1 inch) between the preform and the walls of the constraint fixture.
To practice this method of the invention, the step of placing the inert friable material between the preform and the top, bottom, and walls of the constraint fixture may be accomplished, for instance, by dusting a layer of the material up to ¼ inch thick onto the ejector base plate, placing the annular preform on top of the layer of material on the base plate, placing the inner wall inside of the annular preform, placing the outer wall around the outside of the preform, pouring the inert friable material into the gaps between the inner and outer walls of the constraint fixture and the preform, dusting a layer of the material up to ¼ inch thick onto the top of the preform, and placing the top press plate on top of the layer of material on top of the preform.
The present invention will be more fully understood by reference to the detailed description given hereinbelow and to the accompanying drawings. The drawings are not to scale, and are given by way of illustration only. Accordingly, the drawings should not be construed as limiting the scope of the present invention.
One type of constraint fixture which may be used in the practice of this invention is illustrated in
Referring to the drawings,
US 2005/0093188 A1, entitled BINDERLESS PREFORM MANUFACTURE, provides more details concerning the configuration and use of such mold constraint fixtures. The entire contents of published application US 2005/0093188 A1 are expressly incorporated by reference herein.
As indicated above, another type of constraint fixture that can be used to practice the present invention is the flexible constraint fixture described in application Ser. No. 11/435,763 entitled EXPANDABLE/FLEXIBLE CONSTAINT FIXTURE FOR CARBONIZATION OF CARBON-CARBON PREFORMS. The entire contents of application Ser. No. 11/435,763 are expressly incorporated by reference herein.
For the sake of comparison, comparable pitch-infiltrated fibrous annular preforms may be carbonized by similar processes, with one iteration employing activated carbon in accordance with the present invention and another iteration not employing activated carbon between the preform and the top, bottom, and walls of the constraint fixture. Significantly more (e.g., approximately 50% more) residual carbonized pitch will be found on the outside of the constraint fixture that does not employ activated carbon (illustrated in
This invention has been described hereinabove in terms of preferred or typical embodiments. However, modifications and additions to this invention will be readily apparent to those skilled in the relevant arts upon reading and understanding of the foregoing description. It is intended that all such modifications and additions form a part of the present invention to the extent that they fall within the scope of the several claims appended hereto.
This application claims priority to provisional application Ser. No. 60/690,157, filed Jun. 14, 2005. All of the disclosure of Ser. No. 60/690,157 is expressly incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3249964 | Shaler | May 1966 | A |
3265798 | Lyle, Jr. et al. | Aug 1966 | A |
3405205 | Rowe et al. | Oct 1968 | A |
3867491 | Marin | Feb 1975 | A |
4567007 | Harder | Jan 1986 | A |
4569835 | Di Cio et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4657717 | Cattanach et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
5087193 | Herbert, Jr. | Feb 1992 | A |
5609815 | Bauer | Mar 1997 | A |
5686117 | Snyder et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5916633 | Lackey et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
6033506 | Klett | Mar 2000 | A |
6077464 | Murdie et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6242171 | Gourlaouen | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6323160 | Murdie et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6447893 | Hanzawa et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6521152 | Wood et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6673328 | Klett et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6780505 | Klett et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
20020135090 | Koren | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030015811 | Klett et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030232897 | Pfister et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040033361 | Hamaguchi | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20050093188 | Forest et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060280671 A1 | Dec 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60690157 | Jun 2005 | US |