Patent Grant
10079839
The embodiments described herein relate generally to a method and apparatus for improving the capabilities of security systems in home and business applications. More particularly, the embodiments described herein relate to a touchscreen device that integrates security system control and functionality with network content interactivity, management and presentation.
The field of home and small business security is dominated by technology suppliers who build comprehensive ‘closed’ security systems, where the individual components (sensors, security panels, keypads) operate solely within the confines of a single vendor solution. For example, a wireless motion sensor from vendor A cannot be used with a security panel from vendor B. Each vendor typically has developed sophisticated proprietary wireless technologies to enable the installation and management of wireless sensors, with little or no ability for the wireless devices to operate separate from the vendor's homogeneous system. Furthermore, these traditional systems are extremely limited in their ability to interface either to a local or wide area standards-based network (such as an IP network); most installed systems support only a low-bandwidth, intermittent connection utilizing phone lines or cellular (RF) backup systems. Wireless security technology from providers such as GE Security, Honeywell, and DSC/Tyco are well known in the art, and are examples of this proprietary approach to security systems for home and business.
Furthermore, with the proliferation of the internet, ethernet and WiFi local area networks (LANs) and advanced wide area networks (WANs) that offer high bandwidth, low latency connections (broadband), as well as more advanced wireless WAN data networks (e.g. GPRS or CDMA 1×RTT) there increasingly exists the networking capability to extend these traditional security systems to offer enhanced functionality. In addition, the proliferation of broadband access has driven a corresponding increase in home and small business networking technologies and devices. It is desirable to extend traditional security systems to encompass enhanced functionality such as the ability to control and manage security systems from the world wide web, cellular telephones, or advanced function internet-based devices. Other desired functionality includes an open systems approach to interface home security systems to home and small business networks.
Due to the proprietary approach described above, the traditional vendors are the only ones capable of taking advantage of these new network functions. To date, even though the vast majority of home and business customers have broadband network access in their premises, most security systems do not offer the advanced capabilities associated with high speed, low-latency LANs and WANs. This is primarily because the proprietary vendors have not been able to deliver such technology efficiently or effectively. Solution providers attempting to address this need are becoming known in the art, including three categories of vendors: traditional proprietary hardware providers such as Honeywell and GE Security; third party hard-wired module providers such as Alarm.com, NextAlarm, and uControl; and new proprietary systems providers such as InGrid.
A disadvantage of the prior art technologies of the traditional proprietary hardware providers arises due to the continued proprietary approach of these vendors. As they develop technology in this area it once again operates only with the hardware from that specific vendor, ignoring the need for a heterogeneous, cross-vendor solution. Yet another disadvantage of the prior art technologies of the traditional proprietary hardware providers arises due to the lack of experience and capability of these companies in creating open internet and web based solutions, and consumer friendly interfaces.
A disadvantage of the prior art technologies of the third party hard-wired module providers arises due to the installation and operational complexities and functional limitations associated with hardwiring a new component into existing security systems. Moreover, a disadvantage of the prior art technologies of the new proprietary systems providers arises due to the need to discard all prior technologies, and implement an entirely new form of security system to access the new functionalities associated with broadband and wireless data networks. There remains, therefore, a need for systems, devices, and methods that easily interface to and control the existing proprietary security technologies utilizing a variety of wireless technologies.
Each patent, patent application, and/or publication mentioned in this specification is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety to the same extent as if each individual patent, patent application, and/or publication was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference.
An integrated security system is described that integrates broadband and mobile access and control with conventional security systems and premise devices to provide a tri-mode security network (broadband, cellular/GSM, POTS access) that enables users to remotely stay connected to their premises. The integrated security system, while delivering remote premise monitoring and control functionality to conventional monitored premise protection, complements existing premise protection equipment. The integrated security system integrates into the premise network and couples wirelessly with the conventional security panel, enabling broadband access to premise security systems. Automation devices (cameras, lamp modules, thermostats, etc.) can be added, enabling users to remotely see live video and/or pictures and control home devices via their personal web portal or webpage, mobile phone, and/or other remote client device. Users can also receive notifications via email or text message when happenings occur, or do not occur, in their home.
Although the detailed description herein contains many specifics for the purposes of illustration, anyone of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that many variations and alterations to the following details are within the scope of the embodiments described herein. Thus, the following illustrative embodiments are set forth without any loss of generality to, and without imposing limitations upon, the claimed invention.
As described herein, computer networks suitable for use with the embodiments described herein include local area networks (LAN), wide area networks (WAN), Internet, or other connection services and network variations such as the world wide web, the public internet, a private internet, a private computer network, a public network, a mobile network, a cellular network, a value-added network, and the like. Computing devices coupled or connected to the network may be any microprocessor controlled device that permits access to the network, including terminal devices, such as personal computers, workstations, servers, mini computers, main-frame computers, laptop computers, mobile computers, palm top computers, hand held computers, mobile phones, TV set-top boxes, or combinations thereof. The computer network may include one of more LANs, WANs, Internets, and computers. The computers may serve as servers, clients, or a combination thereof.
The integrated security system can be a component of a single system, multiple systems, and/or geographically separate systems. The integrated security system can also be a subcomponent or subsystem of a single system, multiple systems, and/or geographically separate systems. The integrated security system can be coupled to one or more other components (not shown) of a host system or a system coupled to the host system.
One or more components of the integrated security system and/or a corresponding system or application to which the integrated security system is coupled or connected includes and/or runs under and/or in association with a processing system. The processing system includes any collection of processor-based devices or computing devices operating together, or components of processing systems or devices, as is known in the art. For example, the processing system can include one or more of a portable computer, portable communication device operating in a communication network, and/or a network server. The portable computer can be any of a number and/or combination of devices selected from among personal computers, personal digital assistants, portable computing devices, and portable communication devices, but is not so limited. The processing system can include components within a larger computer system.
The processing system of an embodiment includes at least one processor and at least one memory device or subsystem. The processing system can also include or be coupled to at least one database. The term “processor” as generally used herein refers to any logic processing unit, such as one or more central processing units (CPUs), digital signal processors (DSPs), application-specific integrated circuits (ASIC), etc. The processor and memory can be monolithically integrated onto a single chip, distributed among a number of chips or components, and/or provided by some combination of algorithms. The methods described herein can be implemented in one or more of software algorithm(s), programs, firmware, hardware, components, circuitry, in any combination.
The components of any system that includes the integrated security system can be located together or in separate locations. Communication paths couple the components and include any medium for communicating or transferring files among the components. The communication paths include wireless connections, wired connections, and hybrid wireless/wired connections. The communication paths also include couplings or connections to networks including local area networks (LANs), metropolitan area networks (MANs), wide area networks (WANs), proprietary networks, interoffice or backend networks, and the Internet. Furthermore, the communication paths include removable fixed mediums like floppy disks, hard disk drives, and CD-ROM disks, as well as flash RAM, Universal Serial Bus (USB) connections, RS-232 connections, telephone lines, buses, and electronic mail messages.
Aspects of the integrated security system and corresponding systems and methods described herein may be implemented as functionality programmed into any of a variety of circuitry, including programmable logic devices (PLDs), such as field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), programmable array logic (PAL) devices, electrically programmable logic and memory devices and standard cell-based devices, as well as application specific integrated circuits (ASICs). Some other possibilities for implementing aspects of the integrated security system and corresponding systems and methods include: microcontrollers with memory (such as electronically erasable programmable read only memory (EEPROM)), embedded microprocessors, firmware, software, etc. Furthermore, aspects of the integrated security system and corresponding systems and methods may be embodied in microprocessors having software-based circuit emulation, discrete logic (sequential and combinatorial), custom devices, fuzzy (neural) logic, quantum devices, and hybrids of any of the above device types. Of course the underlying device technologies may be provided in a variety of component types, e.g., metal-oxide semiconductor field-effect transistor (MOSFET) technologies like complementary metal-oxide semiconductor (CMOS), bipolar technologies like emitter-coupled logic (ECL), polymer technologies (e.g., silicon-conjugated polymer and metal-conjugated polymer-metal structures), mixed analog and digital, etc.
It should be noted that any system, method, and/or other components disclosed herein may be described using computer aided design tools and expressed (or represented), as data and/or instructions embodied in various computer-readable media, in terms of their behavioral, register transfer, logic component, transistor, layout geometries, and/or other characteristics. Computer-readable media in which such formatted data and/or instructions may be embodied include, but are not limited to, non-volatile storage media in various forms (e.g., optical, magnetic or semiconductor storage media) and carrier waves that may be used to transfer such formatted data and/or instructions through wireless, optical, or wired signaling media or any combination thereof. Examples of transfers of such formatted data and/or instructions by carrier waves include, but are not limited to, transfers (uploads, downloads, e-mail, etc.) over the Internet and/or other computer networks via one or more data transfer protocols (e.g., HTTP, FTP, SMTP, etc.). When received within a computer system via one or more computer-readable media, such data and/or instruction-based expressions of the above described components may be processed by a processing entity (e.g., one or more processors) within the computer system in conjunction with execution of one or more other computer programs.
Unless the context clearly requires otherwise, throughout the description and the claims, the words “comprise,” “comprising,” and the like are to be construed in an inclusive sense as opposed to an exclusive or exhaustive sense; that is to say, in a sense of “including, but not limited to.” Words using the singular or plural number also include the plural or singular number respectively. Additionally, the words “herein,” “hereunder,” “above,” “below,” and words of similar import, when used in this application, refer to this application as a whole and not to any particular portions of this application. When the word “or” is used in reference to a list of two or more items, that word covers all of the following interpretations of the word: any of the items in the list, all of the items in the list and any combination of the items in the list.
The above description of embodiments of the integrated security system and corresponding systems and methods is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the systems and methods to the precise forms disclosed. While specific embodiments of, and examples for, the integrated security system and corresponding systems and methods are described herein for illustrative purposes, various equivalent modifications are possible within the scope of the systems and methods, as those skilled in the relevant art will recognize. The teachings of the integrated security system and corresponding systems and methods provided herein can be applied to other systems and methods, not only for the systems and methods described above.
The elements and acts of the various embodiments described above can be combined to provide further embodiments. These and other changes can be made to the integrated security system and corresponding systems and methods in light of the above detailed description.
In accordance with the embodiments described herein, a wireless system (e.g., radio frequency (RF)) is provided that enables a security provider or consumer to extend the capabilities of an existing RF-capable security system or a non-RF-capable security system that has been upgraded to support RF capabilities. The system includes an RF-capable Gateway device (physically located within RF range of the RF-capable security system) and associated software operating on the Gateway device. The system also includes a web server, application server, and remote database providing a persistent store for information related to the system.
The security systems of an embodiment, referred to herein as the iControl security system or integrated security system, extend the value of traditional home security by adding broadband access and the advantages of remote home monitoring and home control through the formation of a security network including components of the integrated security system integrated with a conventional premise security system and a premise local area network (LAN). With the integrated security system, conventional home security sensors, cameras, touchscreen keypads, lighting controls, and/or Internet Protocol (IP) devices in the home (or business) become connected devices that are accessible anywhere in the world from a web browser, mobile phone or through content-enabled touchscreens. The integrated security system experience allows security operators to both extend the value proposition of their monitored security systems and reach new consumers that include broadband users interested in staying connected to their family, home and property when they are away from home.
The integrated security system of an embodiment includes security servers (also referred to herein as iConnect servers or security network servers) and an iHub gateway (also referred to herein as the gateway, the iHub, or the iHub client) that couples or integrates into a home network (e.g., LAN) and communicates directly with the home security panel, in both wired and wireless installations. The security system of an embodiment automatically discovers the security system components (e.g., sensors, etc.) belonging to the security system and connected to a control panel of the security system and provides consumers with full two-way access via web and mobile portals. The gateway supports various wireless protocols and can interconnect with a wide range of control panels offered by security system providers. Service providers and users can then extend the system's capabilities with the additional IP cameras, lighting modules or security devices such as interactive touchscreen keypads. The integrated security system adds an enhanced value to these security systems by enabling consumers to stay connected through email and SMS alerts, photo push, event-based video capture and rule-based monitoring and notifications. This solution extends the reach of home security to households with broadband access.
The integrated security system builds upon the foundation afforded by traditional security systems by layering broadband and mobile access, IP cameras, interactive touchscreens, and an open approach to home automation on top of traditional security system configurations. The integrated security system is easily installed and managed by the security operator, and simplifies the traditional security installation process, as described below.
The integrated security system provides an open systems solution to the home security market. As such, the foundation of the integrated security system customer premises equipment (CPE) approach has been to abstract devices, and allows applications to manipulate and manage multiple devices from any vendor. The integrated security system DeviceConnect technology that enables this capability supports protocols, devices, and panels from GE Security and Honeywell, as well as consumer devices using Z-Wave, IP cameras (e.g., Ethernet, wifi, and Homeplug), and IP touchscreens. The DeviceConnect is a device abstraction layer that enables any device or protocol layer to interoperate with integrated security system components. This architecture enables the addition of new devices supporting any of these interfaces, as well as add entirely new protocols.
The benefit of DeviceConnect is that it provides supplier flexibility. The same consistent touchscreen, web, and mobile user experience operate unchanged on whatever security equipment selected by a security system provider, with the system provider's choice of IP cameras, backend data center and central station software.
The integrated security system provides a complete system that integrates or layers on top of a conventional host security system available from a security system provider. The security system provider therefore can select different components or configurations to offer (e.g., CDMA, GPRS, no cellular, etc.) as well as have iControl modify the integrated security system configuration for the system provider's specific needs (e.g., change the functionality of the web or mobile portal, add a GE or Honeywell-compatible TouchScreen, etc.).
The integrated security system integrates with the security system provider infrastructure for central station reporting directly via Broadband and GPRS alarm transmissions. Traditional dial-up reporting is supported via the standard panel connectivity. Additionally, the integrated security system provides interfaces for advanced functionality to the CMS, including enhanced alarm events, system installation optimizations, system test verification, video verification, 2-way voice over IP and GSM.
The integrated security system is an IP centric system that includes broadband connectivity so that the gateway augments the existing security system with broadband and GPRS connectivity. If broadband is down or unavailable GPRS may be used, for example. The integrated security system supports GPRS connectivity using an optional wireless package that includes a GPRS modem in the gateway. The integrated security system treats the GPRS connection as a higher cost though flexible option for data transfers. In an embodiment the GPRS connection is only used to route alarm events (e.g., for cost), however the gateway can be configured (e.g., through the iConnect server interface) to act as a primary channel and pass any or all events over GPRS. Consequently, the integrated security system does not interfere with the current plain old telephone service (POTS) security panel interface. Alarm events can still be routed through POTS; however the gateway also allows such events to be routed through a broadband or GPRS connection as well. The integrated security system provides a web application interface to the CSR tool suite as well as XML web services interfaces for programmatic integration between the security system provider's existing call center products. The integrated security system includes, for example, APIs that allow the security system provider to integrate components of the integrated security system into a custom call center interface. The APIs include XML web service APIs for integration of existing security system provider call center applications with the integrated security system service. All functionality available in the CSR Web application is provided with these API sets. The Java and XML-based APIs of the integrated security system support provisioning, billing, system administration, CSR, central station, portal user interfaces, and content management functions, to name a few. The integrated security system can provide a customized interface to the security system provider's billing system, or alternatively can provide security system developers with APIs and support in the integration effort.
The integrated security system provides or includes business component interfaces for provisioning, administration, and customer care to name a few. Standard templates and examples are provided with a defined customer professional services engagement to help integrate OSS/BSS systems of a Service Provider with the integrated security system.
The integrated security system components support and allow for the integration of customer account creation and deletion with a security system. The iConnect APIs provides access to the provisioning and account management system in iConnect and provide full support for account creation, provisioning, and deletion. Depending on the requirements of the security system provider, the iConnect APIs can be used to completely customize any aspect of the integrated security system backend operational system.
The integrated security system includes a gateway that supports the following standards-based interfaces, to name a few: Ethernet IP communications via Ethernet ports on the gateway, and standard XML/TCP/IP protocols and ports are employed over secured SSL sessions; USB 2.0 via ports on the gateway; 802.11b/g/n IP communications; GSM/GPRS RF WAN communications; CDMA 1×RTT RF WAN communications (optional, can also support EVDO and 3G technologies).
The gateway supports the following proprietary interfaces, to name a few: interfaces including Dialog RF network (319.5 MHz) and RS485 Superbus 2000 wired interface; RF mesh network (908 MHz); and interfaces including RF network (345 MHz) and RS485/RS232bus wired interfaces.
Regarding security for the IP communications (e.g., authentication, authorization, encryption, anti-spoofing, etc), the integrated security system uses SSL to encrypt all IP traffic, using server and client-certificates for authentication, as well as authentication in the data sent over the SSL-encrypted channel. For encryption, integrated security system issues public/private key pairs at the time/place of manufacture, and certificates are not stored in any online storage in an embodiment.
The integrated security system does not need any special rules at the customer premise and/or at the security system provider central station because the integrated security system makes outgoing connections using TCP over the standard HTTP and HTTPS ports. Provided outbound TCP connections are allowed then no special requirements on the firewalls are necessary.
The integrated security system service (also referred to as iControl service) can be managed by a service provider via browser-based Maintenance and Service Management applications that are provided with the iConnect Servers. Or, if desired, the service can be more tightly integrated with existing OSS/BSS and service delivery systems via the iConnect web services-based XML APIs.
The integrated security system service can also coordinate the sending of alarms to the home security Central Monitoring Station (CMS) 199. Alarms are passed to the CMS 199 using standard protocols such as Contact ID or SIA and can be generated from the home security panel location as well as by iConnect server 104 conditions (such as lack of communications with the integrated security system). In addition, the link between the security servers 104 and CMS 199 provides tighter integration between home security and self-monitoring devices and the gateway 102. Such integration enables advanced security capabilities such as the ability for CMS personnel to view photos taken at the time a burglary alarm was triggered. For maximum security, the gateway 102 and iConnect servers 104 support the use of a mobile network (both GPRS and CDMA options are available) as a backup to the primary broadband connection.
The integrated security system service is delivered by hosted servers running software components that communicate with a variety of client types while interacting with other systems.
The iConnect servers 104 support a diverse collection of clients 120 ranging from mobile devices, to PCs, to in-home security devices, to a service provider's internal systems. Most clients 120 are used by end-users, but there are also a number of clients 120 that are used to operate the service.
Clients 120 used by end-users of the integrated security system 100 include, but are not limited to, the following:
In addition to the end-user clients, the iConnect servers 104 support PC browser-based Service Management clients that manage the ongoing operation of the overall service. These clients run applications that handle tasks such as provisioning, service monitoring, customer support and reporting.
There are numerous types of server components of the iConnect servers 104 of an embodiment including, but not limited to, the following: Business Components which manage information about all of the home security and self-monitoring devices; End-User Application Components which display that information for users and access the Business Components via published XML APIs; and Service Management Application Components which enable operators to administer the service (these components also access the Business Components via the XML APIs, and also via published SNMP MIBs).
The server components provide access to, and management of, the objects associated with an integrated security system installation. The top-level object is the “network.” It is a location where a gateway 102 is located, and is also commonly referred to as a site or premises; the premises can include any type of structure (e.g., home, office, warehouse, etc.) at which a gateway 102 is located. Users can only access the networks to which they have been granted permission. Within a network, every object monitored by the gateway 102 is called a device. Devices include the sensors, cameras, home security panels and automation devices, as well as the controller or processor-based device running the gateway applications.
Various types of interactions are possible between the objects in a system. Automations define actions that occur as a result of a change in state of a device. For example, take a picture with the front entry camera when the front door sensor changes to “open”. Notifications are messages sent to users to indicate that something has occurred, such as the front door going to “open” state, or has not occurred (referred to as an iWatch notification). Schedules define changes in device states that are to take place at predefined days and times. For example, set the security panel to “Armed” mode every weeknight at 11:00 pm.
The iConnect Business Components are responsible for orchestrating all of the low-level service management activities for the integrated security system service. They define all of the users and devices associated with a network (site), analyze how the devices interact, and trigger associated actions (such as sending notifications to users). All changes in device states are monitored and logged. The Business Components also manage all interactions with external systems as required, including sending alarms and other related self-monitoring data to the home security Central Monitoring System (CMS) 199. The Business Components are implemented as portable Java J2EE Servlets, but are not so limited.
The following iConnect Business Components manage the main elements of the integrated security system service, but the embodiment is not so limited:
Additional iConnect Business Components handle direct communications with certain clients and other systems, for example:
The iConnect Business Components store information about the objects that they manage in the iControl Service Database 240 and in the iControl Content Store 242. The iControl Content Store is used to store media objects like video, photos and widget content, while the Service Database stores information about users, networks, and devices. Database interaction is performed via a JDBC interface. For security purposes, the Business Components manage all data storage and retrieval.
The iControl Business Components provide web services-based APIs that application components use to access the Business Components' capabilities. Functions of application components include presenting integrated security system service data to end-users, performing administrative duties, and integrating with external systems and back-office applications.
The primary published APIs for the iConnect Business Components include, but are not limited to, the following:
Each API of an embodiment includes two modes of access: Java API or XML API. The XML APIs are published as web services so that they can be easily accessed by applications or servers over a network. The Java APIs are a programmer-friendly wrapper for the XML APIs. Application components and integrations written in Java should generally use the Java APIs rather than the XML APIs directly.
The iConnect Business Components also have an XML-based interface 260 for quickly adding support for new devices to the integrated security system. This interface 260, referred to as DeviceConnect 260, is a flexible, standards-based mechanism for defining the properties of new devices and how they can be managed. Although the format is flexible enough to allow the addition of any type of future device, pre-defined XML profiles are currently available for adding common types of devices such as sensors (SensorConnect), home security panels (PanelConnect) and IP cameras (CameraConnect).
The iConnect End-User Application Components deliver the user interfaces that run on the different types of clients supported by the integrated security system service. The components are written in portable Java J2EE technology (e.g., as Java Servlets, as JavaServer Pages (JSPs), etc.) and they all interact with the iControl Business Components via the published APIs.
The following End-User Application Components generate CSS-based HTML/JavaScript that is displayed on the target client. These applications can be dynamically branded with partner-specific logos and URL links (such as Customer Support, etc.). The End-User Application Components of an embodiment include, but are not limited to, the following:
A number of Application Components are responsible for overall management of the service. These pre-defined applications, referred to as Service Management Application Components, are configured to offer off-the-shelf solutions for production management of the integrated security system service including provisioning, overall service monitoring, customer support, and reporting, for example. The Service Management Application Components of an embodiment include, but are not limited to, the following:
The iConnect servers 104 also support custom-built integrations with a service provider's existing OSS/BSS, CSR and service delivery systems 290. Such systems can access the iConnect web services XML API to transfer data to and from the iConnect servers 104. These types of integrations can compliment or replace the PC browser-based Service Management applications, depending on service provider needs.
As described above, the integrated security system of an embodiment includes a gateway, or iHub. The gateway of an embodiment includes a device that is deployed in the home or business and couples or connects the various third-party cameras, home security panels, sensors and devices to the iConnect server over a WAN connection as described in detail herein. The gateway couples to the home network and communicates directly with the home security panel in both wired and wireless sensor installations. The gateway is configured to be low-cost, reliable and thin so that it complements the integrated security system network-based architecture.
The gateway supports various wireless protocols and can interconnect with a wide range of home security control panels. Service providers and users can then extend the system's capabilities by adding IP cameras, lighting modules and additional security devices. The gateway is configurable to be integrated into many consumer appliances, including set-top boxes, routers and security panels. The small and efficient footprint of the gateway enables this portability and versatility, thereby simplifying and reducing the overall cost of the deployment.
The gateway application layer 302 is the main program that orchestrates the operations performed by the gateway. The Security Engine 304 provides robust protection against intentional and unintentional intrusion into the integrated security system network from the outside world (both from inside the premises as well as from the WAN). The Security Engine 304 of an embodiment comprises one or more sub-modules or components that perform functions including, but not limited to, the following:
As standards evolve, and new encryption and authentication methods are proven to be useful, and older mechanisms proven to be breakable, the security manager can be upgraded “over the air” to provide new and better security for communications between the iConnect server and the gateway application, and locally at the premises to remove any risk of eavesdropping on camera communications.
A Remote Firmware Download module 306 allows for seamless and secure updates to the gateway firmware through the iControl Maintenance Application on the server 104, providing a transparent, hassle-free mechanism for the service provider to deploy new features and bug fixes to the installed user base. The firmware download mechanism is tolerant of connection loss, power interruption and user interventions (both intentional and unintentional). Such robustness reduces down time and customer support issues. Gateway firmware can be remotely download either for one gateway at a time, a group of gateways, or in batches.
The Automations engine 308 manages the user-defined rules of interaction between the different devices (e.g. when door opens turn on the light). Though the automation rules are programmed and reside at the portal/server level, they are cached at the gateway level in order to provide short latency between device triggers and actions.
DeviceConnect 310 includes definitions of all supported devices (e.g., cameras, security panels, sensors, etc.) using a standardized plug-in architecture. The DeviceConnect module 310 offers an interface that can be used to quickly add support for any new device as well as enabling interoperability between devices that use different technologies/protocols. For common device types, pre-defined sub-modules have been defined, making supporting new devices of these types even easier. SensorConnect 312 is provided for adding new sensors, CameraConnect 316 for adding IP cameras, and PanelConnect 314 for adding home security panels.
The Schedules engine 318 is responsible for executing the user defined schedules (e.g., take a picture every five minutes; every day at 8 am set temperature to 65 degrees Fahrenheit, etc.). Though the schedules are programmed and reside at the iConnect server level they are sent to the scheduler within the gateway application. The Schedules Engine 318 then interfaces with SensorConnect 312 to ensure that scheduled events occur at precisely the desired time.
The Device Management module 320 is in charge of all discovery, installation and configuration of both wired and wireless IP devices (e.g., cameras, etc.) coupled or connected to the system. Networked IP devices, such as those used in the integrated security system, require user configuration of many IP and security parameters—to simplify the user experience and reduce the customer support burden, the device management module of an embodiment handles the details of this configuration. The device management module also manages the video routing module described below.
The video routing engine 322 is responsible for delivering seamless video streams to the user with zero-configuration. Through a multi-step, staged approach the video routing engine uses a combination of UPnP port-forwarding, relay server routing and STUN/TURN peer-to-peer routing.
Referring to the WAN portion 410 of the gateway 102, the gateway 102 of an embodiment can communicate with the iConnect server using a number of communication types and/or protocols, for example Broadband 412, GPRS 414 and/or Public Switched Telephone Network (PTSN) 416 to name a few. In general, broadband communication 412 is the primary means of connection between the gateway 102 and the iConnect server 104 and the GPRS/CDMA 414 and/or PSTN 416 interfaces acts as back-up for fault tolerance in case the user's broadband connection fails for whatever reason, but the embodiment is not so limited.
Referring to the LAN portion 420 of the gateway 102, various protocols and physical transceivers can be used to communicate to off-the-shelf sensors and cameras. The gateway 102 is protocol-agnostic and technology-agnostic and as such can easily support almost any device networking protocol. The gateway 102 can, for example, support GE and Honeywell security RF protocols 422, Z-Wave 424, serial (RS232 and RS485) 426 for direct connection to security panels as well as WiFi 428 (802.11b/g) for communication to WiFi cameras.
The integrated security system includes couplings or connections among a variety of IP devices or components, and the device management module is in charge of the discovery, installation and configuration of the IP devices coupled or connected to the system, as described above. The integrated security system of an embodiment uses a “sandbox” network to discover and manage all IP devices coupled or connected as components of the system. The IP devices of an embodiment include wired devices, wireless devices, cameras, interactive touchscreens, and security panels to name a few. These devices can be wired via ethernet cable or Wifi devices, all of which are secured within the sandbox network, as described below. The “sandbox” network is described in detail below.
The examples described above with reference to
The integrated security system of an embodiment includes a touchscreen (also referred to as the iControl touchscreen or integrated security system touchscreen), as described above, which provides core security keypad functionality, content management and presentation, and embedded systems design. The networked security touchscreen system of an embodiment enables a consumer or security provider to easily and automatically install, configure and manage the security system and touchscreen located at a customer premise. Using this system the customer may access and control the local security system, local IP devices such as cameras, local sensors and control devices (such as lighting controls or pipe freeze sensors), as well as the local security system panel and associated security sensors (such as door/window, motion, and smoke detectors). The customer premise may be a home, business, and/or other location equipped with a wired or wireless broadband IP connection.
The system of an embodiment includes a touchscreen with a configurable software user interface and/or a gateway device (e.g., iHub) that couples or connects to a premise security panel through a wired or wireless connection, and a remote server that provides access to content and information from the premises devices to a user when they are remote from the home. The touchscreen supports broadband and/or WAN wireless connectivity. In this embodiment, the touchscreen incorporates an IP broadband connection (e.g., Wifi radio, Ethernet port, etc.), and/or a cellular radio (e.g., GPRS/GSM, CDMA, WiMax, etc.). The touchscreen described herein can be used as one or more of a security system interface panel and a network user interface (UI) that provides an interface to interact with a network (e.g., LAN, WAN, internet, etc.).
The touchscreen of an embodiment provides an integrated touchscreen and security panel as an all-in-one device. Once integrated using the touchscreen, the touchscreen and a security panel of a premise security system become physically co-located in one device, and the functionality of both may even be co-resident on the same CPU and memory (though this is not required).
The touchscreen of an embodiment also provides an integrated IP video and touchscreen UI. As such, the touchscreen supports one or more standard video CODECs/players (e.g., H.264, Flash Video, MOV, MPEG4, M-JPEG, etc.). The touchscreen UI then provides a mechanism (such as a camera or video widget) to play video. In an embodiment the video is streamed live from an IP video camera. In other embodiments the video comprises video clips or photos sent from an IP camera or from a remote location.
The touchscreen of an embodiment provides a configurable user interface system that includes a configuration supporting use as a security touchscreen. In this embodiment, the touchscreen utilizes a modular user interface that allows components to be modified easily by a service provider, an installer, or even the end user. Examples of such a modular approach include using Flash widgets, HTML-based widgets, or other downloadable code modules such that the user interface of the touchscreen can be updated and modified while the application is running. In an embodiment the touchscreen user interface modules can be downloaded over the internet. For example, a new security configuration widget can be downloaded from a standard web server, and the touchscreen then loads such configuration app into memory, and inserts it in place of the old security configuration widget. The touchscreen of an embodiment is configured to provide a self-install user interface.
Embodiments of the networked security touchscreen system described herein include a touchscreen device with a user interface that includes a security toolbar providing one or more functions including arm, disarm, panic, medic, and alert. The touchscreen therefore includes at least one screen having a separate region of the screen dedicated to a security toolbar. The security toolbar of an embodiment is present in the dedicated region at all times that the screen is active.
The touchscreen of an embodiment includes a home screen having a separate region of the screen allocated to managing home-based functions. The home-based functions of an embodiment include managing, viewing, and/or controlling IP video cameras. In this embodiment, regions of the home screen are allocated in the form of widget icons; these widget icons (e.g. for cameras, thermostats, lighting, etc) provide functionality for managing home systems. So, for example, a displayed camera icon, when selected, launches a Camera Widget, and the Camera widget in turn provides access to video from one or more cameras, as well as providing the user with relevant camera controls (take a picture, focus the camera, etc.)
The touchscreen of an embodiment includes a home screen having a separate region of the screen allocated to managing, viewing, and/or controlling internet-based content or applications. For example, the Widget Manager UI presents a region of the home screen (up to and including the entire home screen) where internet widgets icons such as weather, sports, etc. may be accessed). Each of these icons may be selected to launch their respective content services.
The touchscreen of an embodiment is integrated into a premise network using the gateway, as described above. The gateway as described herein functions to enable a separate wireless network, or sub-network, that is coupled, connected, or integrated with another network (e.g., WAN, LAN of the host premises, etc.). The sub-network enabled by the gateway optimizes the installation process for IP devices, like the touchscreen, that couple or connect to the sub-network by segregating these IP devices from other such devices on the network. This segregation of the IP devices of the sub-network further enables separate security and privacy policies to be implemented for these IP devices so that, where the IP devices are dedicated to specific functions (e.g., security), the security and privacy policies can be tailored specifically for the specific functions. Furthermore, the gateway and the sub-network it forms enables the segregation of data traffic, resulting in faster and more efficient data flow between components of the host network, components of the sub-network, and between components of the sub-network and components of the network.
The touchscreen of an embodiment includes a core functional embedded system that includes an embedded operating system, required hardware drivers, and an open system interface to name a few. The core functional embedded system can be provided by or as a component of a conventional security system (e.g., security system available from GE Security). These core functional units are used with components of the integrated security system as described herein. Note that portions of the touchscreen description below may include reference to a host premise security system (e.g., GE security system), but these references are included only as an example and do not limit the touchscreen to integration with any particular security system.
As an example, regarding the core functional embedded system, a reduced memory footprint version of embedded Linux forms the core operating system in an embodiment, and provides basic TCP/IP stack and memory management functions, along with a basic set of low-level graphics primitives. A set of device drivers is also provided or included that offer low-level hardware and network interfaces. In addition to the standard drivers, an interface to the RS 485 bus is included that couples or connects to the security system panel (e.g., GE Concord panel). The interface may, for example, implement the Superbus 2000 protocol, which can then be utilized by the more comprehensive transaction-level security functions implemented in PanelConnect technology (e.g SetAlarmLevel (int level, int partition, char *accessCode)). Power control drivers are also provided.
More specifically, the touchscreen, when configured as a home security device, includes but is not limited to the following application or software modules: RS 485 and/or RS-232 bus security protocols to conventional home security system panel (e.g., GE Concord panel); functional home security classes and interfaces (e.g. Panel ARM state, Sensor status, etc.); Application/Presentation layer or engine; Resident Application; Consumer Home Security Application; installer home security application; core engine; and System bootloader/Software Updater. The core Application engine and system bootloader can also be used to support other advanced content and applications. This provides a seamless interaction between the premise security application and other optional services such as weather widgets or IP cameras.
An alternative configuration of the touchscreen includes a first Application engine for premise security and a second Application engine for all other applications. The integrated security system application engine supports content standards such as HTML, XML, Flash, etc. and enables a rich consumer experience for all ‘widgets’, whether security-based or not. The touchscreen thus provides service providers the ability to use web content creation and management tools to build and download any ‘widgets’ regardless of their functionality.
As discussed above, although the Security Applications have specific low-level functional requirements in order to interface with the premise security system, these applications make use of the same fundamental application facilities as any other ‘widget’, application facilities that include graphical layout, interactivity, application handoff, screen management, and network interfaces, to name a few.
Content management in the touchscreen provides the ability to leverage conventional web development tools, performance optimized for an embedded system, service provider control of accessible content, content reliability in a consumer device, and consistency between ‘widgets’ and seamless widget operational environment. In an embodiment of the integrated security system, widgets are created by web developers and hosted on the integrated security system Content Manager (and stored in the Content Store database). In this embodiment the server component caches the widgets and offers them to consumers through the web-based integrated security system provisioning system. The servers interact with the advanced touchscreen using HTTPS interfaces controlled by the core engine and dynamically download widgets and updates as needed to be cached on the touchscreen. In other embodiments widgets can be accessed directly over a network such as the Internet without needing to go through the iControl Content Manager
Referring to
The application engine of the touchscreen provides the presentation and interactivity capabilities for all applications (widgets) that run on the touchscreen, including both core security function widgets and third party content widgets.
A component of the application engine is the Presentation Engine, which includes a set of libraries that implement the standards-based widget content (e.g., XML, HTML, JavaScript, Flash) layout and interactivity. This engine provides the widget with interfaces to dynamically load both graphics and application logic from third parties, support high level data description language as well as standard graphic formats. The set of web content-based functionality available to a widget developer is extended by specific touchscreen functions implemented as local web services by the Core Engine.
The resident application of the touchscreen is the master service that controls the interaction of all widgets in the system, and enforces the business and security rules required by the service provider. For example, the resident application determines the priority of widgets, thereby enabling a home security widget to override resource requests from a less critical widget (e.g. a weather widget). The resident application also monitors widget behavior, and responds to client or server requests for cache updates.
The core engine of the touchscreen manages interaction with other components of the integrated security system, and provides an interface through which the resident application and authorized widgets can get information about the home security system, set alarms, install sensors, etc. At the lower level, the Core Engine's main interactions are through the PanelConnect API, which handles all communication with the security panel, and the gateway Interface, which handles communication with the gateway. In an embodiment, both the iHub Interface and PanelConnect API are resident and operating on the touchscreen. In another embodiment, the PanelConnect API runs on the gateway or other device that provides security system interaction and is accessed by the touchscreen through a web services interface.
The Core Engine also handles application and service level persistent and cached memory functions, as well as the dynamic provisioning of content and widgets, including but not limited to: flash memory management, local widget and content caching, widget version management (download, cache flush new/old content versions), as well as the caching and synchronization of user preferences. As a portion of these services the Core engine incorporates the bootloader functionality that is responsible for maintaining a consistent software image on the touchscreen, and acts as the client agent for all software updates. The bootloader is configured to ensure full update redundancy so that unsuccessful downloads cannot corrupt the integrated security system.
Video management is provided as a set of web services by the Core Engine. Video management includes the retrieval and playback of local video feeds as well as remote control and management of cameras (all through iControl CameraConnect technology).
Both the high level application layer and the mid-level core engine of the touchscreen can make calls to the network. Any call to the network made by the application layer is automatically handed off to a local caching proxy, which determines whether the request should be handled locally. Many of the requests from the application layer are web services API requests, although such requests could be satisfied by the iControl servers, they are handled directly by the touchscreen and the gateway. Requests that get through the caching proxy are checked against a white list of acceptable sites, and, if they match, are sent off through the network interface to the gateway. Included in the Network Subsystem is a set of network services including HTTP, HTTPS, and server-level authentication functions to manage the secure client-server interface. Storage and management of certificates is incorporated as a part of the network services layer.
Server components of the integrated security system servers support interactive content services on the touchscreen. These server components include, but are not limited to the content manager, registry manager, network manager, and global registry, each of which is described herein.
The Content Manager oversees aspects of handling widget data and raw content on the touchscreen. Once created and validated by the service provider, widgets are ‘ingested’ to the Content Manager, and then become available as downloadable services through the integrated security system Content Management APIs. The Content manager maintains versions and timestamp information, and connects to the raw data contained in the backend Content Store database. When a widget is updated (or new content becomes available) all clients registering interest in a widget are systematically updated as needed (a process that can be configured at an account, locale, or system-wide level).
The Registry Manager handles user data, and provisioning accounts, including information about widgets the user has decided to install, and the user preferences for these widgets.
The Network Manager handles getting and setting state for all devices on the integrated security system network (e.g., sensors, panels, cameras, etc.). The Network manager synchronizes with the gateway, the advanced touchscreen, and the subscriber database.
The Global Registry is a primary starting point server for all client services, and is a logical referral service that abstracts specific server locations/addresses from clients (touchscreen, gateway 102, desktop widgets, etc.). This approach enables easy scaling/migration of server faints.
The touchscreen of an embodiment operates wirelessly with a premise security system. The touchscreen of an embodiment incorporates an RF transceiver component that either communicates directly with the sensors and/or security panel over the panel's proprietary RF frequency, or the touchscreen communicates wirelessly to the gateway over 802.11, Ethernet, or other IP-based communications channel, as described in detail herein. In the latter case the gateway implements the PanelConnect interface and communicates directly to the security panel and/or sensors over wireless or wired networks as described in detail above.
The touchscreen of an embodiment is configured to operate with multiple security systems through the use of an abstracted security system interface. In this embodiment, the PanelConnect API can be configured to support a plurality of proprietary security system interfaces, either simultaneously or individually as described herein. In one embodiment of this approach, the touchscreen incorporates multiple physical interfaces to security panels (e.g. GE Security RS-485, Honeywell RF, etc.) in addition to the PanelConnect API implemented to support multiple security interfaces. The change needed to support this in PanelConnect is a configuration parameter specifying the panel type connection that is being utilized.
So for example, the setARMState( )function is called with an additional parameter (e.g., Armstate=setARMState(type=“ARM STAYS ARM AWAY DISARM”, Parameters=“ExitDelay=30|Lights=OFF”, panelType=“GE Concord4 RS485”)). The ‘panelType’ parameter is used by the setARMState function (and in practice by all of the PanelConnect functions) to select an algorithm appropriate to the specific panel out of a plurality of alogorithms.
The touchscreen of an embodiment is self-installable. Consequently, the touchscreen provides a ‘wizard’ approach similar to that used in traditional computer installations (e.g. InstallShield). The wizard can be resident on the touchscreen, accessible through a web interface, or both. In one embodiment of a touchscreen self-installation process, the service provider can associate devices (sensors, touchscreens, security panels, lighting controls, etc.) remotely using a web-based administrator interface.
The touchscreen of an embodiment includes a battery backup system for a security touchscreen. The touchscreen incorporates a standard Li-ion or other battery and charging circuitry to allow continued operation in the event of a power outage. In an embodiment the battery is physically located and connected within the touchscreen enclosure. In another embodiment the battery is located as a part of the power transformer, or in between the power transformer and the touchscreen.
The example configurations of the integrated security system described above with reference to
The touchscreen of this alternative embodiment integrates the components of the gateway with the components of the touchscreen as described herein. More specifically, the touchscreen of this alternative embodiment includes software or applications described above with reference to
As standards evolve, and new encryption and authentication methods are proven to be useful, and older mechanisms proven to be breakable, the security manager can be upgraded “over the air” to provide new and better security for communications between the iConnect server and the gateway application, and locally at the premises to remove any risk of eavesdropping on camera communications.
A Remote Firmware Download module 306 of the touchscreen allows for seamless and secure updates to the gateway firmware through the iControl Maintenance Application on the server 104, providing a transparent, hassle-free mechanism for the service provider to deploy new features and bug fixes to the installed user base. The firmware download mechanism is tolerant of connection loss, power interruption and user interventions (both intentional and unintentional). Such robustness reduces down time and customer support issues. Touchscreen firmware can be remotely download either for one touchscreen at a time, a group of touchscreen, or in batches.
The Automations engine 308 of the touchscreen manages the user-defined rules of interaction between the different devices (e.g. when door opens turn on the light). Though the automation rules are programmed and reside at the portal/server level, they are cached at the gateway level in order to provide short latency between device triggers and actions.
DeviceConnect 310 of the touchscreen touchscreen includes definitions of all supported devices (e.g., cameras, security panels, sensors, etc.) using a standardized plug-in architecture. The DeviceConnect module 310 offers an interface that can be used to quickly add support for any new device as well as enabling interoperability between devices that use different technologies/protocols. For common device types, pre-defined sub-modules have been defined, making supporting new devices of these types even easier. SensorConnect 312 is provided for adding new sensors, CameraConnect 316 for adding IP cameras, and PanelConnect 314 for adding home security panels.
The Schedules engine 318 of the touchscreen is responsible for executing the user defined schedules (e.g., take a picture every five minutes; every day at 8 am set temperature to 65 degrees Fahrenheit, etc.). Though the schedules are programmed and reside at the iConnect server level they are sent to the scheduler within the gateway application of the touchscreen. The Schedules Engine 318 then interfaces with SensorConnect 312 to ensure that scheduled events occur at precisely the desired time.
The Device Management module 320 of the touchscreen is in charge of all discovery, installation and configuration of both wired and wireless IP devices (e.g., cameras, etc.) coupled or connected to the system. Networked IP devices, such as those used in the integrated security system, require user configuration of many IP and security parameters, and the device management module of an embodiment handles the details of this configuration. The device management module also manages the video routing module described below.
The video routing engine 322 of the touchscreen is responsible for delivering seamless video streams to the user with zero-configuration. Through a multi-step, staged approach the video routing engine uses a combination of UPnP port-forwarding, relay server routing and STUN/TURN peer-to-peer routing. The video routing engine is described in detail in the Related Applications.
The gateway of an embodiment, whether a stand-along component or integrated with a touchscreen, enables couplings or connections and thus the flow or integration of information between various components of the host premises and various types and/or combinations of IP devices, where the components of the host premises include a network (e.g., LAN) and/or a security system or subsystem to name a few. Consequently, the gateway controls the association between and the flow of information or data between the components of the host premises. For example, the gateway of an embodiment forms a sub-network coupled to another network (e.g., WAN, LAN, etc.), with the sub-network including IP devices. The gateway further enables the association of the IP devices of the sub-network with appropriate systems on the premises (e.g., security system, etc.). Therefore, for example, the gateway can form a sub-network of IP devices configured for security functions, and associate the sub-network only with the premises security system, thereby segregating the IP devices dedicated to security from other IP devices that may be coupled to another network on the premises.
The gateway of an embodiment, as described herein, enables couplings or connections and thus the flow of information between various components of the host premises and various types and/or combinations of IP devices, where the components of the host premises include a network, a security system or subsystem to name a few. Consequently, the gateway controls the association between and the flow of information or data between the components of the host premises. For example, the gateway of an embodiment forms a sub-network coupled to another network (e.g., WAN, LAN, etc.), with the sub-network including IP devices. The gateway further enables the association of the IP devices of the sub-network with appropriate systems on the premises (e.g., security system, etc.). Therefore, for example, the gateway can form a sub-network of IP devices configured for security functions, and associate the sub-network only with the premises security system, thereby segregating the IP devices dedicated to security from other IP devices that may be coupled to another network on the premises.
In an example embodiment,
An embodiment of the IP device discovery and management begins with a user or installer activating 1302 the gateway and initiating 1304 the install mode of the system. This places the gateway in an install mode. Once in install mode, the gateway shifts to a default (Install) Wifi configuration. This setting will match the default setting for other integrated security system-enabled devices that have been pre-configured to work with the integrated security system. The gateway will then begin to provide 1306 DHCP addresses for these IP devices. Once the devices have acquired a new DHCP address from the gateway, those devices are available for configuration into a new secured Wifi network setting.
The user or installer of the system selects 1308 all devices that have been identified as available for inclusion into the integrated security system. The user may select these devices by their unique IDs via a web page, Touchscreen, or other client interface. The gateway provides 1310 data as appropriate to the devices. Once selected, the devices are configured 1312 with appropriate secured Wifi settings, including SSID and WPA/WPA-2 keys that are used once the gateway switches back to the secured sandbox configuration from the “Install” settings. Other settings are also configured as appropriate for that type of device. Once all devices have been configured, the user is notified and the user can exit install mode. At this point all devices will have been registered 1314 with the integrated security system servers.
The installer switches 1316 the gateway to an operational mode, and the gateway instructs or directs 1318 all newly configured devices to switch to the “secured” Wifi sandbox settings. The gateway then switches 1320 to the “secured” Wifi settings. Once the devices identify that the gateway is active on the “secured” network, they request new DHCP addresses from the gateway which, in response, provides 1322 the new addresses. The devices with the new addresses are then operational 1324 on the secured network.
In order to ensure the highest level of security on the secured network, the gateway can create or generate a dynamic network security configuration based on the unique ID and private key in the gateway, coupled with a randomizing factor that can be based on online time or other inputs. This guarantees the uniqueness of the gateway secured network configuration.
To enable the highest level of performance, the gateway analyzes the RF spectrum of the 802.11x network and determines which frequency band/channel it should select to run.
An alternative embodiment of the camera/IP device management process leverages the local ethernet connection of the sandbox network on the gateway. This alternative process is similar to the Wifi discovery embodiment described above, except the user connects the targeted device to the ethernet port of the sandbox network to begin the process. This alternative embodiment accommodates devices that have not been pre-configured with the default “Install” configuration for the integrated security system.
This alternative embodiment of the IP device discovery and management begins with the user/installer placing the system into install mode. The user is instructed to attach an IP device to be installed to the sandbox Ethernet port of the gateway. The IP device requests a DHCP address from the gateway which, in response to the request, provides the address. The user is presented the device and is asked if he/she wants to install the device. If yes, the system configures the device with the secured Wifi settings and other device-specific settings (e.g., camera settings for video length, image quality etc.). The user is next instructed to disconnect the device from the ethernet port. The device is now available for use on the secured sandbox network.
Referring to
In an embodiment of this security system connection, the touchscreen 1403 communicates to the gateway 1402, and has no direct communication with the security panel. In this embodiment, the touchscreen core application 1410 accesses the remote service APIs 1412 which provide security system functionality (e.g. ARM/DISARM panel, sensor state, get/set panel configuration parameters, initiate or get alarm events, etc.). In an embodiment, the remote service APIs 1412 implement one or more of the following functions, but the embodiment is not so limited: Armstate=setARMState(type=“ARM STAY|ARM AWAY|DISARM”, Parameters=“ExitDelay=30|Lights=OFF”); sensorState=getSensors(type=“ALL|SensorName|SensorNameList”); result=setSensorState(SensorName, parameters=“Option1, Options2, . . . Option n”); interruptHandler=SensorEvent( ) and, interruptHandler=alarmEvent( ).
Functions of the remote service APIs 1412 of an embodiment use a remote PanelConnect API 1424 which resides in memory on the gateway 1402. The touchscreen 1403 communicates with the gateway 1402 through a suitable network interface such as an Ethernet or 802.11 RF connection, for example. The remote PanelConnect API 1424 provides the underlying Security System Interfaces 1426 used to communicate with and control one or more types of security panel via wired link 1430 and/or RF link 3. The PanelConnect API 1224 provides responses and input to the remote services APIs 1426, and in turn translates function calls and data to and from the specific protocols and functions supported by a specific implementation of a Security Panel (e.g. a GE Security Simon XT or Honeywell Vista 20P). In an embodiment, the PanelConnect API 1224 uses a 345 MHz RF transceiver or receiver hardware/firmware module to communicate wirelessly to the security panel and directly to a set of 345 MHz RF-enabled sensors and devices, but the embodiment is not so limited.
The gateway of an alternative embodiment communicates over a wired physical coupling or connection to the security panel using the panel's specific wired hardware (bus) interface and the panel's bus-level protocol.
In an alternative embodiment, the Touchscreen 1403 implements the same PanelConnect API 1414 locally on the Touchscreen 1403, communicating directly with the Security Panel 2 and/or Sensors 2 over the proprietary RF link or over a wired link for that system. In this embodiment the Touchscreen 1403, instead of the gateway 1402, incorporates the 345 MHz RF transceiver to communicate directly with Security Panel 2 or Sensors 2 over the RF link 2. In the case of a wired link the Touchscreen 1403 incorporates the real-time hardware (e.g. a PIC chip and RS232-variant serial link) to physically connect to and satisfy the specific bus-level timing requirements of the SecurityPanel2.
In yet another alternative embodiment, either the gateway 1402 or the Touchscreen 1403 implements the remote service APIs. This embodiment includes a Cricket device (“Cricket”) which comprises but is not limited to the following components: a processor (suitable for handling 802.11 protocols and processing, as well as the bus timing requirements of SecurityPanel1); an 802.11 (WiFi) client IP interface chip; and, a serial bus interface chip that implements variants of RS232 or RS485, depending on the specific Security Panel.
The Cricket also implements the full PanelConnect APIs such that it can perform the same functions as the case where the gateway implements the PanelConnect APIs. In this embodiment, the touchscreen core application 1410 calls functions in the remote service APIs 1412 (such as setArmStateQ). These functions in turn couple or connect to the remote Cricket through a standard IP connection (“Cricket IP Link”) (e.g., Ethernet, Homeplug, the gateway's proprietary Wifi network, etc.). The Cricket in turn implements the PanelConnect API, which responds to the request from the touchscreen core application, and performs the appropriate function using the proprietary panel interface. This interface uses either the wireless or wired proprietary protocol for the specific security panel and/or sensors.
Unlike conventional systems that extend an existing security system, the system of an embodiment operates utilizing the proprietary wireless protocols of the security system manufacturer. In one illustrative embodiment, the gateway is an embedded computer with an IP LAN and WAN connection and a plurality of RF transceivers and software protocol modules capable of communicating with a plurality of security systems each with a potentially different RF and software protocol interface. After the gateway has completed the discovery and learning 1540 of sensors and has been integrated 1550 as a virtual control device in the extant security system, the system becomes operational. Thus, the security system and associated sensors are presented 1550 as accessible devices to a potential plurality of user interface subsystems.
The system of an embodiment integrates 1560 the functionality of the extant security system with other non-security devices including but not limited to IP cameras, touchscreens, lighting controls, door locking mechanisms, which may be controlled via RF, wired, or powerline-based networking mechanisms supported by the gateway or servers.
The system of an embodiment provides a user interface subsystem 1570 enabling a user to monitor, manage, and control the system and associated sensors and security systems. In an embodiment of the system, a user interface subsystem is an HTML/XML/Javascript/Java/AJAX/Flash presentation of a monitoring and control application, enabling users to view the state of all sensors and controllers in the extant security system from a web browser or equivalent operating on a computer, PDA, mobile phone, or other consumer device.
In another illustrative embodiment of the system described herein, a user interface subsystem is an HTML/XML/Javascript/Java/AJAX presentation of a monitoring and control application, enabling users to combine the monitoring and control of the extant security system and sensors with the monitoring and control of non-security devices including but not limited to IP cameras, touchscreens, lighting controls, door locking mechanisms.
In another illustrative embodiment of the system described herein, a user interface subsystem is a mobile phone application enabling users to monitor and control the extant security system as well as other non-security devices.
In another illustrative embodiment of the system described herein, a user interface subsystem is an application running on a keypad or touchscreen device enabling users to monitor and control the extant security system as well as other non-security devices.
In another illustrative embodiment of the system described herein, a user interface subsystem is an application operating on a TV or set-top box connected to a TV enabling users to monitor and control the extant security system as well as other non-security devices.
Moreover, other elements of the system of an embodiment may be conventional, well-known elements that need not be explained in detail herein. For example, security system 1610 could be any type home or business security system, such devices including but not limited to a standalone RF home security system or a non-RF-capable wired home security system with an add-on RF interface module. In the integrated security system 1600 of this example, security system 1610 includes an RF-capable wireless security panel (WSP) 1611 that acts as the master controller for security system 1610. Well-known examples of such a WSP include the GE Security Concord, Networx, and Simon panels, the Honeywell Vista and Lynx panels, and similar panels from DSC and Napco, to name a few. A wireless module 1614 includes the RF hardware and protocol software necessary to enable communication with and control of a plurality of wireless devices 1613. WSP 1611 may also manage wired devices 1614 physically connected to WSP 1611 with an RS232 or RS485 or Ethernet connection or similar such wired interface.
In an implementation consistent with the systems and methods described herein, Gateway 1620 provides the interface between security system 1610 and LAN and/or WAN for purposes of remote control, monitoring, and management. Gateway 1620 communicates with an external web server 1640, database 1650, and application server 1660 over network 1630 (which may comprise WAN, LAN, or a combination thereof). In this example system, application logic, remote user interface functionality, as well as user state and account are managed by the combination of these remote servers. Gateway 1620 includes server connection manager 1621, a software interface module responsible for all server communication over network 1630. Event manager 1622 implements the main event loop for Gateway 1620, processing events received from device manager 1624 (communicating with non-security system devices including but not limited to IP cameras, wireless thermostats, or remote door locks). Event manager 1622 further processes events and control messages from and to security system 1610 by utilizing WSP manager 1623.
WSP manager 1623 and device manager 1624 both rely upon wireless protocol manager 1626 which receives and stores the proprietary or standards-based protocols required to support security system 1610 as well as any other devices interfacing with gateway 1620. WSP manager 1623 further utilizes the comprehensive protocols and interface algorithms for a plurality of security systems 1610 stored in the WSP DB client database associated with wireless protocol manager 1626. These various components implement the software logic and protocols necessary to communicate with and manager devices and security systems 1610. Wireless Transceiver hardware modules 1625 are then used to implement the physical RF communications link to such devices and security systems 1610. An illustrative wireless transceiver 1625 is the GE Security Dialog circuit board, implementing a 319.5 MHz two-way RF transceiver module. In this example, RF Link 1670 represents the 319.5 MHz RF communication link, enabling gateway 1620 to monitor and control WSP 1611 and associated wireless and wired devices 1613 and 1614, respectively.
In one embodiment, server connection manager 1621 requests and receives a set of wireless protocols for a specific security system 1610 (an illustrative example being that of the GE Security Concord panel and sensors) and stores them in the WSP DB portion of the wireless protocol manager 1626. WSP manager 1623 then utilizes such protocols from wireless protocol manager 1626 to initiate the sequence of processes detailed in
In another embodiment, gateway 1620 incorporates a plurality of wireless transceivers 1625 and associated protocols managed by wireless protocol manager 1626. In this embodiment events and control of multiple heterogeneous devices may be coordinated with WSP 1611, wireless devices 1613, and wired devices 1614. For example a wireless sensor from one manufacturer may be utilized to control a device using a different protocol from a different manufacturer.
In another embodiment, gateway 1620 incorporates a wired interface to security system 1610, and incorporates a plurality of wireless transceivers 1625 and associated protocols managed by wireless protocol manager 1626. In this embodiment events and control of multiple heterogeneous devices may be coordinated with WSP 1611, wireless devices 1613, and wired devices 1614.
Of course, while an illustrative embodiment of an architecture of the system of an embodiment is described in detail herein with respect to
Gateway 1620 utilizes the appropriate protocols to mimic 1760 the first identified device 1614. In this operation gateway 1620 identifies itself using the unique or pseudo-unique identifier of the first found device 1614, and sends an appropriate change of state message over RF Link 1670. In the event that WSP 1611 responds to this change of state message, the device 1614 is then added 1770 to the system in database 1650. Gateway 1620 associates 1780 any other information (such as zone name or token-based identifier) with this device 1614 in database 1650, enabling gateway 1620, user interface modules, or any application to retrieve this associated information.
In the event that WSP 1611 does not respond to the change of state message, the device 1614 is not added 1770 to the system in database 1650, and this device 1614 is identified as not being a part of security system 1610 with a flag, and is either ignored or added as an independent device, at the discretion of the system provisioning rules. Operations hereunder repeat 1785 operations 1760, 1770, 1780 for all devices 1614 if applicable. Once all devices 1614 have been tested in this way, the system begins operation 1790.
In another embodiment, gateway 1620 utilizes a wired connection to WSP 1611, but also incorporates a wireless transceiver 1625 to communicate directly with devices 1614. In this embodiment, operations under 1720 above are removed, and operations under 1740 above are modified so the system of this embodiment utilizes wireline protocols to add itself as an authorized control device in security system 1610.
A description of an example embodiment follows in which the Gateway (
The automatic security system installation begins with the assignment of an authorization key to components of the security system (e.g., gateway, kit including the gateway, etc.). The assignment of an authorization key is done in lieu of creating a user account. An installer later places the gateway in a user's premises along with the premises security system. The installer uses a computer to navigate to a web portal (e.g., integrated security system web interface), logs in to the portal, and enters the authorization key of the installed gateway into the web portal for authentication. Once authenticated, the gateway automatically discovers devices at the premises (e.g., sensors, cameras, light controls, etc.) and adds the discovered devices to the system or “network”. The installer assigns names to the devices, and tests operation of the devices back to the server (e.g., did the door open, did the camera take a picture, etc.). The security device information is optionally pushed or otherwise propagated to a security panel and/or to the server network database. The installer finishes the installation, and instructs the end user on how to create an account, username, and password. At this time the user enters the authorization key which validates the account creation (uses a valid authorization key to associate the network with the user's account). New devices may subsequently be added to the security network in a variety of ways (e.g., user first enters a unique ID for each device/sensor and names it in the server, after which the gateway can automatically discover and configure the device).
A description of another example embodiment follows in which the security system (
GE Security's Dialog network is one of the most widely deployed and tested wireless security systems in the world. The physical RF network is based on a 319.5 MHz unlicensed spectrum, with a bandwidth supporting up to 19 Kbps communications. Typical use of this bandwidth—even in conjunction with the integrated security system—is far less than that. Devices on this network can support either one-way communication (either a transmitter or a receiver) or two-way communication (a transceiver). Certain GE Simon, Simon XT, and Concord security control panels incorporate a two-way transceiver as a standard component. The gateway also incorporates the same two-way transceiver card. The physical link layer of the network is managed by the transceiver module hardware and firmware, while the coded payload bitstreams are made available to the application layer for processing.
Sensors in the Dialog network typically use a 60-bit protocol for communicating with the security panel transceiver, while security system keypads and the gateway use the encrypted 80-bit protocol. The Dialog network is configured for reliability, as well as low-power usage. Many devices are supervised, i.e. they are regularly monitored by the system ‘master’ (typically a GE security panel), while still maintaining excellent power usage characteristics. A typical door window sensor has a battery life in excess of 5-7 years.
The gateway has two modes of operation in the Dialog network: a first mode of operation is when the gateway is configured or operates as a ‘slave’ to the GE security panel; a second mode of operation is when the gateway is configured or operates as a ‘master’ to the system in the event a security panel is not present. In both configurations, the gateway has the ability to ‘listen’ to network traffic, enabling the gateway to continually keep track of the status of all devices in the system. Similarly, in both situations the gateway can address and control devices that support setting adjustments (such as the GE wireless thermostat).
In the configuration in which the gateway acts as a ‘slave’ to the security panel, the gateway is ‘learned into’ the system as a GE wireless keypad. In this mode of operation, the gateway emulates a security system keypad when managing the security panel, and can query the security panel for status and ‘listen’ to security panel events (such as alarm events).
The gateway incorporates an RF Transceiver manufactured by GE Security, but is not so limited. This transceiver implements the Dialog protocols and handles all network message transmissions, receptions, and timing. As such, the physical, link, and protocol layers of the communications between the gateway and any GE device in the Dialog network are totally compliant with GE Security specifications.
At the application level, the gateway emulates the behavior of a GE wireless keypad utilizing the GE Security 80-bit encrypted protocol, and only supported protocols and network traffic are generated by the gateway. Extensions to the Dialog RF protocol of an embodiment enable full control and configuration of the panel, and iControl can both automate installation and sensor enrollment as well as direct configuration downloads for the panel under these protocol extensions.
As described above, the gateway participates in the GE Security network at the customer premises. Because the gateway has intelligence and a two-way transceiver, it can ‘hear’ all of the traffic on that network. The gateway makes use of the periodic sensor updates, state changes, and supervisory signals of the network to maintain a current state of the premises. This data is relayed to the integrated security system server (e.g.,
The gateway can directly (or indirectly through the Simon XT panel) control two-way devices on the network. For example, the gateway can direct a GE Security Thermostat to change its setting to ‘Cool’ from ‘Off’, as well as request an update on the current temperature of the room. The gateway performs these functions using the existing GE Dialog protocols, with little to no impact on the network; a gateway device control or data request takes only a few dozen bytes of data in a network that can support 19 Kbps.
By enrolling with the Simon XT as a wireless keypad, as described herein, the gateway includes data or information of all alarm events, as well as state changes relevant to the security panel. This information is transferred to the gateway as encrypted packets in the same way that the information is transferred to all other wireless keypads on the network.
Because of its status as an authorized keypad, the gateway can also initiate the same panel commands that a keypad can initiate. For example, the gateway can arm or disarm the panel using the standard Dialog protocol for this activity. Other than the monitoring of standard alarm events like other network keypads, the only incremental data traffic on the network as a result of the gateway is the infrequent remote arm/disarm events that the gateway initiates, or infrequent queries on the state of the panel.
The gateway is enrolled into the Simon XT panel as a ‘slave’ device which, in an embodiment, is a wireless keypad. This enables the gateway for all necessary functionality for operating the Simon XT system remotely, as well as combining the actions and information of non-security devices such as lighting or door locks with GE Security devices. The only resource taken up by the gateway in this scenario is one wireless zone (sensor ID).
The gateway of an embodiment supports three forms of sensor and panel enrollment/installation into the integrated security system, but is not limited to this number of enrollment/installation options. The enrollment/installation options of an embodiment include installer installation, kitting, and panel, each of which is described below.
Under the installer option, the installer enters the sensor IDs at time of installation into the integrated security system web portal or iScreen. This technique is supported in all configurations and installations.
Kits can be pre-provisioned using integrated security system provisioning applications when using the kitting option. At kitting time, multiple sensors are automatically associated with an account, and at install time there is no additional work required.
In the case where a panel is installed with sensors already enrolled (i.e. using the GE Simon XT enrollment process), the gateway has the capability to automatically extract the sensor information from the system and incorporate it into the user account on the integrated security system server.
The gateway and integrated security system of an embodiment uses an auto-learn process for sensor and panel enrollment in an embodiment. The deployment approach of an embodiment can use additional interfaces that GE Security is adding to the Simon XT panel. With these interfaces, the gateway has the capability to remotely enroll sensors in the panel automatically. The interfaces include, but are not limited to, the following: EnrollDevice(ID, type, name, zone, group); SetDeviceParameters(ID, type, Name, zone, group), GetDeviceParameters(zone); and RemoveDevice(zone).
The integrated security system incorporates these new interfaces into the system, providing the following install process. The install process can include integrated security system logistics to handle kitting and pre-provisioning. Pre-kitting and logistics can include a pre-provisioning kitting tool provided by integrated security system that enables a security system vendor or provider (“provider”) to offer pre-packaged initial ‘kits’. This is not required but is recommended for simplifying the install process. This example assumes a ‘Basic’ kit is preassembled and includes one (1) Simon XT, three (3) Door/window sensors, one (1) motion sensor, one (1) gateway, one (1) keyfob, two (2) cameras, and ethernet cables. The kit also includes a sticker page with all Zones (1-24) and Names (full name list).
The provider uses the integrated security system kitting tool to assemble ‘Basic’ kit packages. The contents of different types of starter kits may be defined by the provider. At the distribution warehouse, a worker uses a bar code scanner to scan each sensor and the gateway as it is packed into the box. An ID label is created that is attached to the box. The scanning process automatically associates all the devices with one kit, and the new ID label is the unique identifier of the kit. These boxes are then sent to the provider for distribution to installer warehouses. Individual sensors, cameras, etc. are also sent to the provider installer warehouse. Each is labeled with its own barcode/ID.
An installation and enrollment procedure of a security system including a gateway is described below as one example of the installation process.
An installation and enrollment procedure of a security system including a gateway is described below as an alternative example of the installation process. This installation process is for use for enrolling sensors into the SimonXT and integrated security system and is compatible with all existing GE Simon panels.
The integrated security system supports all pre-kitting functionality described in the installation process above. However, for the purpose of the following example, no kitting is used.
The panel of an embodiment can be programmed remotely. The CMS pushes new programming to SimonXT over a telephone or GPRS link. Optionally, iControl and GE provide a broadband link or coupling to the gateway and then a link from the gateway to the Simon XT over GE RF.
In addition to the configurations described above, the gateway of an embodiment supports takeover configurations in which it is introduced or added into a legacy security system. A description of example takeover configurations follow in which the security system (
The security system can optionally include RF wireless sensors (e.g., GE wireless sensors utilizing the GE Dialog RF technology), IP cameras, a GE-iControl Touchscreen (the touchscreen is assumed to be an optional component in the configurations described herein, and is thus treated separately from the iHub; in systems in which the touchscreen is a component of the base security package, the integrated iScreen (available from iControl Networks, Palo Alto, Calif.) can be used to combine iHub technology with the touchscreen in a single unit), and Z-Wave devices to name a few.
The takeover configurations described below assume takeover by a “new” system of an embodiment of a security system provided by another third party vendor, referred to herein as an “original” or “legacy” system. Generally, the takeover begins with removal of the control panel and keypad of the legacy system. A GE Concord panel is installed to replace the control panel of the legacy system along with an iHub with GPRS Modem. The legacy system sensors are then connected or wired to the Concord panel, and a GE keypad or touchscreen is installed to replace the control panel of the legacy system. The iHub includes the iControl RF card, which is compatible with the legacy system. The iHub finds and manages the wireless sensors of the legacy system, and learns the sensors into the Concord by emulating the corresponding GE sensors. The iHub effectively acts as a relay for legacy wireless sensors.
Once takeover is complete, the new security system provides a homogeneous system that removes the compromises inherent in taking over or replacing a legacy system. For example, the new system provides a modern touchscreen that may include additional functionality, new services, and supports integration of sensors from various manufacturers. Furthermore, lower support costs can be realized because call centers, installers, etc. are only required to support one architecture. Additionally, there is minimal install cost because only the panel is required to be replaced as a result of the configuration flexibility offered by the iHub.
The system takeover configurations described below include but are not limited to a dedicated wireless configuration, a dedicated wireless configuration that includes a touchscreen, and a fished Ethernet configuration. Each of these configurations is described in detail below.
The GE-iControl Touchscreen can be used with either of an 802.11 connection or Ethernet connection with the iHub. Because the takeover involves a GE Concord panel (or Simon XT), the touchscreen is always an option. No extra wiring is required for the touchscreen as it can use the 4-wire set from the replaced keypad of the legacy system. This provides power, battery backup (through Concord), and data link (RS485 Superbus 2000) between Concord and touchscreen. The touchscreen receives its broadband connectivity through the dedicated 802.11 link to the iHub.
The takeover installation process is similar to the installation process described above, except the control panel of the legacy system is replaced; therefore, only the differences with the installation described above are provided here. The takeover approach of an embodiment uses the existing RS485 control interfaces that GE Security and iControl support with the iHub, touchscreen, and Concord panel. With these interfaces, the iHub is capable of automatically enrolling sensors in the panel. The exception is the leverage of an iControl RF card compatible with legacy systems to ‘takeover’ existing RF sensors. A description of the takeover installation process follows.
During the installation process, the iHub uses an RF Takeover Card to automatically extract all sensor IDs, zones, and names from the legacy panel. The installer removes connections at the legacy panel from hardwired wired sensors and labels each with the zone. The installer pulls the legacy panel and replaces it with the GE Concord panel. The installer also pulls the existing legacy keypad and replaces it with either a GE keypad or a GE-iControl touchscreen. The installer connects legacy hardwired sensors to appropriate wired zone (from labels) on the Concord. The installer connects the iHub to the local network and connects the iHub RS485 interface to the Concord panel. The iHub automatically ‘enrolls’ legacy RF sensors into the Concord panel as GE sensors (maps IDs), and pushes or otherwise propagates other information gathered from HW panel (zone, name, group). The installer performs a test of all sensors back to CMS. In operation, the iHub relays legacy sensor data to the Concord panel, emulating equivalent GE sensor behavior and protocols.
The areas of the installation process particular to the legacy takeover include how the iHub extracts sensor info from the legacy panel and how the iHub automatically enrolls legacy RF sensors and populates Concord with wired zone information. Each of these areas is described below.
In having the iHub extract sensor information from the legacy panel, the installer ‘enrolls’ iHub into the legacy panel as a wireless keypad (use install code and house ID available from panel). The iHub legacy RF Takeover Card is a compatible legacy RF transceiver. The installer uses the web portal to place iHub into ‘Takeover Mode’, and the web portal the automatically instructs the iHub to begin extraction. The iHub queries the panel over the RF link (to get all zone information for all sensors, wired and RF). The iHub then stores the legacy sensor information received during the queries on the iConnect server.
The iHub also automatically enrolls legacy RF sensors and populates Concord with wired zone information. In so doing, the installer selects ‘Enroll legacy Sensors into Concord’ (next step in ‘Takeover’ process on web portal). The iHub automatically queries the iConnect server, and downloads legacy sensor information previously extracted. The downloaded information includes an ID mapping from legacy ID to ‘spoofed’ GE ID. This mapping is stored on the server as part of the sensor information (e.g., the iConnect server knows that the sensor is a legacy sensor acting in GE mode). The iHub instructs Concord to go into install mode, and sends appropriate Superbus 2000 commands for sensor learning to the panel. For each sensor, the ‘spoofed’ GE ID is loaded, and zone, name, and group are set based on information extracted from legacy panel. Upon completion, the iHub notifies the server, and the web portal is updated to reflect next phase of Takeover (e.g., ‘Test Sensors’).
Sensors are tested in the same manner as described above. When a HW sensor is triggered, the signal is captured by the iHub legacy RF Takeover Card, translated to the equivalent GE RF sensor signal, and pushed to the panel as a sensor event on the SuperBus 2000 wires.
In support of remote programming of the panel, CMS pushes new programming to Concord over a phone line, or to the iConnect CMS/Alarm Server API, which in turn pushes the programming to the iHub. The iHub uses the Concord Superbus 2000 RS485 link to push the programming to the Concord panel.
Components of the gateway of the integrated security system described herein control discovery, installation and configuration of both wired and wireless IP devices (e.g., cameras, etc.) coupled or connected to the system, as described herein with reference to
By way of reference, conventional video cameras have the ability to stream digital video in a variety of formats and over a variety of networks. Internet protocol (IP) video cameras, which include video cameras using an IP transport network (e.g., Ethernet, WiFi (IEEE 802.11 standards), etc.) are prevalent and increasingly being utilized in home monitoring and security system applications. With the proliferation of the internet, Ethernet and WiFi local area networks (LANs) and advanced wide area networks (WANs) that offer high bandwidth, low latency connections (broadband), as well as more advanced wireless WAN data networks (e.g. GPRS or CDMA 1×RTT), there increasingly exists the networking capability to extend traditional security systems to offer IP-based video. However, a fundamental reason for such IP video in a security system is to enable a user or security provider to monitor live or otherwise streamed video from outside the host premises (and the associated LAN).
The conventional solution to this problem has involved a technique known as ‘port fowarding’, whereby a ‘port’ on the LAN's router/firewall is assigned to the specific LAN IP address for an IP camera, or a proxy to that camera. Once a port has been ‘forwarded’ in this manner, a computer external to the LAN can address the LAN's router directly, and request access to that port. This access request is then forwarded by the router directly to the IP address specified, the IP camera or proxy. In this way an external device can directly access an IP camera within the LAN and view or control the streamed video.
The issues with this conventional approach include the following: port forwarding is highly technical and most users do not know how/why to do it; automatic port forwarding is difficult and problematic using emerging standards like UPnP; the camera IP address is often reset in response to a power outage/router reboot event; there are many different routers with different ways/capabilities for port forwarding. In short, although port forwarding can work, it is frequently less than adequate to support a broadly deployed security solution utilizing IP cameras.
Another approach to accessing streaming video externally to a LAN utilizes peer-to-peer networking technology. So-called peer-to-peer networks, which includes networks in which a device or client is connected directly to another device or client, typically over a Wide Area Network (WAN) and without a persistent server connection, are increasingly common. In addition to being used for the sharing of files between computers (e.g., Napster and KaZaa), peer-to-peer networks have also been more recently utilized to facilitate direct audio and media streaming in applications such as Skype. In these cases, the peer-to-peer communications have been utilized to enable telephony-style voice communications and video conferencing between two computers, each enabled with an IP-based microphone, speaker, and video camera. A fundamental reason for adopting such peer-to-peer technology is the ability to transparently ‘punch through’ LAN firewalls to enable external access to the streaming voice and video content, and to do so in a way that scales to tens of millions of users without creating an untenable server load.
A limitation of the conventional peer-to-peer video transport lies in the personal computer (PC)-centric nature of the solution. Each of the conventional solutions uses a highly capable PC connected to the video camera, with the PC providing the advanced software functionality required to initiate and manage the peer-to-peer connection with the remote client. A typical security or remote home monitoring system requires multiple cameras, each with its own unique IP address, and only a limited amount of processing capability in each camera such that the conventional PC-centric approach cannot easily solve the need. Instead of a typical PC-centric architecture with three components (a “3-way IP Video System”) that include a computer device with video camera, a mediating server, and a PC client with video display capability, the conventional security system adds a plurality of fourth components that are standalone IP video cameras (requiring a “4-way IP Video System”), another less-than-ideal solution.
In accordance with the embodiments described herein, IP camera management systems and methods are provided that enable a consumer or security provider to easily and automatically configure and manage IP cameras located at a customer premise. Using this system IP camera management may be extended to remote control and monitoring from outside the firewall and router of the customer premise.
With reference to
Alternatively, with reference to
When a server relay is present 2330, the IP camera is instructed 2331 to stream to the server, and the connection is managed 2332 through the server. In response to the stream terminating 2351, operations return to gateway operation 2313, and waits to receive another request 2320 for a stream from one of the plurality of IP video cameras available on the LAN.
When a server relay is not present 2330, the requestor's WAN IP address/port is provided 2333 to the gateway or gateway relay. When a gateway relay is present 2340, the IP camera is instructed 2341 to stream to the gateway, and the gateway relays 2342 the connection to the requestor. In response to the stream terminating 2351, operations return to gateway operation 2313, and waits to receive another request 2320 for a stream from one of the plurality of IP video cameras available on the LAN. When a gateway relay is not present 2340, the IP camera is instructed 2343 to stream to an address, and a handoff 2344 is made resulting in direct communication between the camera and the requestor. In response to the stream terminating 2351, operations return to gateway operation 2313, and waits to receive another request 2320 from one of the plurality of IP video cameras available on the LAN.
The integrated security system of an embodiment supports numerous video stream formats or types of video streams. Supported video streams include, but are not limited to, Motion Picture Experts Group (MPEG)-4 (MPEG-4)/Real-Time Streaming Protocol (RTSP), MPEG-4 over Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP), and Motion Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG) (MJPEG).
The integrated security system of an embodiment supports the MPEG-4/RTSP video streaming method (supported by video servers and clients) which uses RTSP for the control channel and Real-time Transport Protocol (RTP) for the data channel. Here the RTSP channel is over Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) while the data channel uses User Datagram Protocol (UDP). This method is widely supported by both streaming sources (e.g., cameras) and stream clients (e.g., remote client devices, Apple Quicktime, VideoLAN, IPTV mobile phones, etc).
Encryption can be added to the two channels under MPEG-4/RTSP. For example, the RTSP control channel can be encrypted using SSL/TLS. The data channel can also be encrypted.
If the camera or video stream source inside the home does not support encryption for either RTSP or RTP channels, the gateway located on the LAN can facilitate the encrypted RTSP method by maintaining separate TCP sessions with the video stream source device and with the encrypted RTSP client outside the LAN, and relay all communication between the two sessions. In this situation, any communication between the gateway and the video stream source that is not encrypted could be encrypted by the gateway before being relayed to the RTSP client outside the LAN. In many cases the gateway is an access point for the encrypted and private Wifi network on which the video stream source device is located. This means that communication between the gateway and the video stream source device is encrypted at the network level, and communication between the gateway and the RTSP client is encrypted at the transport level. In this fashion the gateway can compensate for a device that does not support encrypted RTSP.
The integrated security system of an embodiment also supports reverse RTSP. Reverse RTSP includes taking a TCP-based protocol like RTSP, and reversing the roles of client and server (references to “server” include the iControl server, also referred to as the iConnect server) when it comes to TCP session establishment. For example, in standard RTSP the RTSP client is the one that establishes the TCP connection with the stream source server (the server listens on a port for incoming connections). In Reverse RTSP, the RTSP client listens on a port for incoming connections from the stream source server. Once the TCP connection is established, the RTSP client begins sending commands to the server over the TCP connection just as it would in standard RTSP.
When using Reverse RTSP, the video stream source is generally on a LAN, protected by a firewall. Having a device on the LAN initiate the connection to the RTSP client outside the firewall enables easy network traversal.
If the camera or video stream source inside the LAN does not support Reverse RTSP, then the gateway facilitates the Reverse RTSP method by initiating separate TCP sessions with the video stream source device and with the Reverse RTSP client outside the LAN, and then relays all communication between the two sessions. In this fashion the gateway compensates for a stream source device that does not support Reverse RTSP.
As described in the encryption description above, the gateway can further compensate for missing functionalities on the device such as encryption. If the device does not support encryption for either RTSP or RTP channels, the gateway can communicate with the device using these un-encrypted streams, and then encrypt the streams before relaying them out of the LAN to the RTSP Reverse client.
Servers of the integrated security system can compensate for RTSP clients that do not support Reverse RTSP. In this situation, the server accepts TCP connections from both the RTSP client and the Reverse RTSP video stream source (which could be a gateway acting on behalf of a stream source device that does not support Reverse RTSP). The server then relays the control and video streams from the Reverse RTSP video stream source to the RTSP client. The server can further compensate for the encryption capabilities of the RTSP client; if the RTSP client does not support encryption then the server can provide an unencrypted stream to the RTSP client even though an encrypted stream was received from the Reverse RTSP streaming video source.
The integrated security system of an embodiment also supports Simple Traversal of User Datagram Protocol (UDP) through Network Address Translators (NAT) (STUN)/Traversal Using Relay NAT (TURN) peer-to-peer routing. STUN and Turn are techniques for using a server to help establish a peer-to-peer UDP data stream (it does not apply to TCP streams). The bandwidth consumed by the data channel of a video stream is usually many thousands of times larger than that used by the control channel. Consequently, when a peer-to-peer connection for both the RTSP and RTP channels is not possible, there is still a great incentive to use STUN/TURN techniques in order to achieve a peer-to-peer connection for the RTP data channel.
Here, a method referred to herein as RTSP with STUN/TURN is used by the integrated security system. The RTSP with STUN/TURN is a method in which the video streaming device is instructed over the control channel to stream its UDP data channel to a different network address than that of the other end of the control TCP connection (usually the UDP data is simply streamed to the IP address of the RTSP client). The result is that the RTSP or Reverse RTSP TCP channel can be relayed using the gateway and/or the server, while the RTP UDP data channel can flow directly from the video stream source device to the video stream client.
If a video stream source device does not support RTSP with STUN/TURN, the gateway can compensate for the device by relaying the RTSP control channel via the server to the RTSP client, and receiving the RTP data channel and then forwarding it directly to the RTSP with STUN/TURN enabled client. Encryption can also be added here by the gateway.
The integrated security system of an embodiment supports MPEG-4 over HTTP. MPEG-4 over HTTP is similar to MPEG-4 over RTSP except that both the RTSP control channel and the RTP data channel are passed over an HTTP TCP session. Here a single TCP session can be used, splitting it into multiple channels using common HTTP techniques like chunked transfer encoding.
The MPEG-4 over HTTP is generally supported by many video stream clients and server devices, and encryption can easily be added to it using SSL/TLS. Because it uses TCP for both channels, STUN/TURN techniques may not apply in the event that a direct peer-to-peer TCP session between client and server cannot be established.
As described above, encryption can be provided using SSL/TLS taking the form of HTTPS. And as with MPEG-4 over RTSP, a gateway can compensate for a stream source device that does not support encryption by relaying the TCP streams and encrypting the TCP stream between the gateway and the stream client. In many cases the gateway is an access point for the encrypted and private Wifi network on which the video stream source device is located. This means that communication between the gateway and the video stream source device is encrypted at the network level, and communication between the gateway and the video stream client is encrypted at the transport level. In this fashion the gateway can compensate for a device that does not support HTTPS.
As with Reverse RTSP, the integrated security system of an embodiment supports Reverse HTTP. Reverse HTTP includes taking a TCP-based protocol like HTTP, and reversing the roles of client and server when it comes to TCP session establishment. For example, in conventional HTTP the HTTP client is the one that establishes the TCP connection with the server (the server listens on a port for incoming connections). In Reverse HTTP, the HTTP client listens on a port for incoming connections from the server. Once the TCP connection is established, the HTTP client begins sending commands to the server over the TCP connection just as it would in standard HTTP.
When using Reverse HTTP, the video stream source is generally on a LAN, protected by a firewall. Having a device on the LAN initiate the connection to the HTTP client outside the firewall enables easy network traversal.
If the camera or video stream source inside the LAN does not support Reverse HTTP, then the gateway can facilitate the Reverse HTTP method by initiating separate TCP sessions with the video stream source device and with the Reverse HTTP client outside the LAN, and then relay all communication between the two sessions. In this fashion the gateway can compensate for a stream source device that does not support Reverse HTTP.
As described in the encryption description above, the gateway can further compensate for missing functionalities on the device such as encryption. If the device does not support encrypted HTTP (e.g., HTTPS), then the gateway can communicate with the device using HTTP, and then encrypt the TCP stream(s) before relaying out of the LAN to the Reverse HTTP client.
The servers of an embodiment can compensate for HTTP clients that do not support Reverse HTTP. In this situation, the server accepts TCP connections from both the HTTP client and the Reverse HTTP video stream source (which could be a gateway acting on behalf of a stream source device that does not support Reverse HTTP). The server then relays the TCP streams from the Reverse HTTP video stream source to the HTTP client. The server can further compensate for the encryption capabilities of the HTTP client; if the HTTP client does not support encryption then the server can provide an unencrypted stream to the HTTP client even though an encrypted stream was received from the Reverse HTTP streaming video source.
The integrated security system of an embodiment supports MJPEG as described above. MJPEG is a streaming technique in which a series of JPG images are sent as the result of an HTTP request. Because MJPEG streams are transmitted over HTTP, HTTPS can be employed for encryption and most MJPEG clients support the resulting encrypted stream. And as with MPEG-4 over HTTP, a gateway can compensate for a stream source device that does not support encryption by relaying the TCP streams and encrypting the TCP stream between the gateway and the stream client. In many cases the gateway is an access point for the encrypted and private Wifi network on which the video stream source device is located. This means that communication between the gateway and the video stream source device is encrypted at the network level, and communication between the gateway and the video stream client is encrypted at the transport level. In this fashion the gateway can compensate for a device that does not support HTTPS.
The integrated system of an embodiment supports Reverse HTTP. Reverse HTTP includes taking a TCP-based protocol like HTTP, and reversal of the roles of client and server when it comes to TCP session establishment can be employed for MJPEG streams. For example, in standard HTTP the HTTP client is the one who establishes the TCP connection with the server (the server listens on a port for incoming connections). In Reverse HTTP, the HTTP client listens on a port for incoming connections from the server. Once the TCP connection is established, the HTTP client begins sending commands to the server over the TCP connection just as it would in standard HTTP.
When using Reverse HTTP, the video stream source is generally on a LAN, protected by a firewall. Having a device on the LAN initiate the connection to the HTTP client outside the firewall enables network traversal.
If the camera or video stream source inside the LAN does not support Reverse HTTP, then the gateway can facilitate the Reverse HTTP method by initiating separate TCP sessions with the video stream source device and with the Reverse HTTP client outside the LAN, and then relay all communication between the two sessions. In this fashion the gateway can compensate for a stream source device that does not support Reverse HTTP.
As described in the encryption description above, the gateway can further compensate for missing functionalities on the device such as encryption. If the device does not support encrypted HTTP (e.g., HTTPS), then the gateway can communicate with the device using HTTP, and then encrypt the TCP stream(s) before relaying out of the LAN to the Reverse HTTP client.
The servers can compensate for HTTP clients that do not support Reverse HTTP. In this situation, the server accepts TCP connections from both the HTTP client and the Reverse HTTP video stream source (which could be a gateway acting on behalf of a stream source device that does not support Reverse HTTP). The server then relays the TCP streams from the Reverse HTTP video stream source to the HTTP client. The server can further compensate for the encryption capabilities of the HTTP client; if the HTTP client does not support encryption then the server can provide an unencrypted stream to the HTTP client even though an encrypted stream was received from the Reverse HTTP streaming video source.
The integrated security system of an embodiment considers numerous parameters in determining or selecting one of the streaming formats described above for use in transferring video streams. The parameters considered in selecting a streaming format include, but are not limited to, security requirements, client capabilities, device capabilities, and network/system capabilities.
The security requirements for a video stream are considered in determining an applicable streaming format in an embodiment. Security requirements fall into two categories, authentication and privacy, each of which is described below.
Authentication as a security requirement means that stream clients must present credentials in order to obtain a stream. Furthermore, this presentation of credentials should be done in a way that is secure from network snooping and replays. An example of secure authentication is Basic Authentication over HTTPS. Here a username and password are presented over an encrypted HTTPS channel so snooping and replays are prevented. Basic Authentication alone, however, is generally not sufficient for secure authentication.
Because not all streaming clients support SSL/TLS, authentication methods that do not require it are desirable. Such methods include Digest Authentication and one-time requests. A one-time request is a request that can only be made by a client one time, and the server prevents a reuse of the same request. One-time requests are used to control access to a stream source device by stream clients that do not support SSL/TLS. An example here is providing video access to a mobile phone. Typical mobile phone MPEG-4 viewers do not support encryption. In this case, one of the MPEG-4 over RTSP methods described above can be employed to get the video stream relayed to an server. The server can then provide the mobile phone with a one-time request Universal Resource Locator (URL) for the relayed video stream source (via a Wireless Application Protocol (WAP) page). Once the stream ends, the mobile phone would need to obtain another one-time request URL from the server (via WAP, for example) in order to view the stream again.
Privacy as a security requirement means that the contents of the video stream must be encrypted. This is a requirement that may be impossible to satisfy on clients that do not support video stream encryption, for example many mobile phones. If a client supports encryption for some video stream format(s), then the “best” of those formats should be selected. Here “best” is determined by the stream type priority algorithm.
The client capabilities are considered in determining an applicable streaming format in an embodiment. In considering client capabilities, the selection depends upon the supported video stream formats that include encryption, and the supported video stream formats that do not support encryption.
The device capabilities are considered in determining an applicable streaming format in an embodiment. In considering device capabilities, the selection depends upon the supported video stream formats that include encryption, the supported video stream formats that do not support encryption, and whether the device is on an encrypted private Wifi network managed by the gateway (in which case encryption at the network level is not required).
The network/system capabilities are considered in determining an applicable streaming format in an embodiment. In considering network/system capabilities, the selection depends upon characteristics of the network or system across which the stream must travel. The characteristics considered include, for example, the following: whether there is a gateway and/or server on the network to facilitate some of the fancier video streaming types or security requirements; whether the client is on the same LAN as the gateway, meaning that network firewall traversal is not needed.
Streaming methods with the highest priority are peer-to-peer because they scale best with server resources. Universal Plug and Play (UPnP) can be used by the gateway to open ports on the video stream device's LAN router and direct traffic through those ports to the video stream device. This allows a video stream client to talk directly with the video stream device or talk directly with the gateway which can in turn facilitate communication with the video stream device.
Another factor in determining the best video stream format to use is the success of STUN and TURN methods for establishing direct peer-to-peer UDP communication between the stream source device and the stream client. Again, the gateway and the server can help with the setup of this communication.
Client bandwidth availability and processing power are other factors in determining the best streaming methods. For example, due to its bandwidth overhead an encrypted MJPEG stream should not be considered for most mobile phone data networks.
Device bandwidth availability can also be considered in choosing the best video stream format. For example, consideration can be given to whether the upstream bandwidth capabilities of the typical residential DSL support two or more simultaneous MJPEG streams.
Components of the integrated security system of an embodiment, while considering various parameters in selecting a video streaming format to transfer video streams from streaming source devices and requesting client devices, prioritize streaming formats according to these parameters. The parameters considered in selecting a streaming format include, as described above, security requirements, client capabilities, device capabilities, and network/system capabilities. Components of the integrated security system of an embodiment select a video streaming format according to the following priority, but alternative embodiments can use other priorities.
The selected format is UPnP or peer-to-peer MPEG-4 over RTSP with encryption when both requesting client device and streaming source device support this format.
The selected format is UPnP or peer-to-peer MPEG-4 over RTSP with authentication when the requesting client device does not support encryption or UPnP or peer-to-peer MPEG-4 over RTSP with encryption.
The selected format is UPnP (peer-to-peer) MPEG-4 over HTTPS when both requesting client device and streaming source device support this format.
The selected format is UPnP (peer-to-peer) MPEG-4 over HTTP when the requesting client device does not support encryption or UPnP (peer-to-peer) MPEG-4 over HTTPS.
The selected format is UPnP (peer-to-peer) MPEG-4 over RTSP facilitated by gateway or touchscreen (including or incorporating gateway components) (to provide encryption), when the requesting client device supports encrypted RTSP and the streaming source device supports MPEG-4 over RTSP.
The selected format is UPnP (peer-to-peer) MPEG-4 over HTTPS facilitated by gateway or touchscreen (including or incorporating gateway components) (to provide encryption) when the requesting client device supports MPEG-4 over HTTPS and the streaming source device supports MPEG-4 over HTTP.
The selected format is UPnP (peer-to-peer) MJPEG over HTTPS when the networks and devices can handle the bandwidth and both requesting client device and streaming source device support MJPEG over HTTPS.
The selected format is Reverse RTSP with STUN/TURN facilitated by the server when the streaming source device initiates SSL/TLS TCP to server, the streaming source device supports Reverse RTSP over SSL/TLS with STUN/TURN, and the requesting client device supports RTSP with STUN/TURN.
The selected format is Reverse RTSP with STUN/TURN facilitated by server and gateway or touchscreen (including or incorporating gateway components) when the gateway initiates SSL/TLS TCP to the server and to the streaming source device, the streaming source device supports RTSP, and the requesting client device supports RTSP with STUN/TURN.
The selected format is Reverse MPEG over RTSP/HTTP facilitated by the server when the streaming source device initiates SSL/TLS TCP to server, the streaming source device supports Reverse RTSP or HTTP over SSL/TLS, and the requesting client device supports MPEG over RTSP/HTTP.
The selected format is Reverse MPEG over RTSP/HTTP facilitated by server and gateway or touchscreen (including or incorporating gateway components) when the gateway initiates SSL/TLS TCP to server and to streaming source device, the streaming source device supports MPEG over RTSP or HTTP, and the requesting client device supports MPEG over RTSP/HTTP.
The selected format is UPnP (peer-to-peer) MJPEG over HTTP when the networks and devices can handle the bandwidth and when the requesting client device does not support encryption and does not support MPEG-4.
The selected format is Reverse MJPEG over HTTPS facilitated by the server when the streaming source device initiates SSL/TLS TCP to server, the streaming source device supports Reverse MJPEG over SSL/TLS, and the requesting client device supports MJPEG.
The selected format is Reverse MJPEG over HTTPS facilitated by server and gateway or touchscreen (including or incorporating gateway components) when the gateway initiates SSL/TLS TCP to the server and to the streaming source device, the streaming source device supports MJPEG, and the requesting client device supports MJPEG.
Additional detailed description of camera tunnel implementation details follow.
An embodiment uses XMPP for communication with a remote video camera as a lightweight (bandwidth) method for maintaining real-time communication with the remote camera. More specifically, the remote camera is located on another NAT (e.g., NAT traversal).
An embodiment comprises a method for including a remotely located camera in a home automation system. For example, using XMPP via cloud XMPP server to couple or connect camera to home automation system. This can be used with in-car cameras, cell phone cameras, and re-locatable cameras (e.g., dropped in the office, the hotel room, the neighbor's house, etc.).
Components of an embodiment are distributed so that any one can be offline while system continues to function (e.g., panel can be down while camera still up, motion detection from camera, video clip upload etc. continue to work.
Embodiments extend the PSIA in one or more of the following areas: wifi roaming configuration; video relay commands; wifi connectivity test; media tunnel for live video streaming in the context of a security system; motion notification mechanism and configuration (motion heartbeat) (e.g., helps with scalable server); XMPP for lightweight communication (helps with scalable server, reduced bandwidth, for maintaining persistent connection with a gateway); ping request sent over XMPP as health check mechanism; shared secret authentication bootstrapping process; asynchronous error status delivery by the camera for commands invoked by the gateway if the camera is responsible for delivering errors to the gateway in an asynchronous fashion (e.g., gateway requests a firmware update or a video clip upload).
Embodiments extend the home automation system to devices located on separate networks, and make them useable as general-purpose communication devices. These cameras can be placed in the office, vacation home, neighbor house, software can be put onto a cell phone, into a car, navigation system, etc.
Embodiments use a global device registry for enabling a device/camera to locate the server and home to which it is assigned.
Embodiments include methods for bootstrapping and re-bootstrapping of authentication credentials. The methods include activation key entry by installer into the cloud web interface. Activation key generation is based upon mac address and a shared secret between manufacturer and the service provider. Embodiments of the system allow activation of a camera with valid activation key that is not already provisioned in the global registry server.
Embodiments include a web-based interface for use in activating, configuring, remote firmware update, and re-configuring of a camera.
Embodiments process or locate local wifi access points and provide these as options during camera configuring and re-configuring. Embodiments generate and provide recommendations around choosing a best wifi access point based upon characteristics of the network (e.g., signal strength, error rates, interference, etc.). Embodiments include methods for testing and diagnosing issues with wifi and network access.
Embodiments include cameras able to perform this wifi test using only one physical network interface, an approach that enables the camera to dynamically change this physical interface from wired to wifi. Embodiments are able to change the network settings (wifi etc) remotely using the same process.
Cameras of an embodiment can be configured with multiple network preferences with priority order so that the camera can move between different locations and the camera can automatically find the best network to join (e.g., can have multiple ssid+bssid+password sets configured and prioritized).
Regarding firmware download, embodiments include a mechanism to monitor the status of the firmware update, provide feedback to the end user and improve overall quality of the system.
Embodiments use RTSP over SSL to a cloud media relay server to allow live video NAT traversal to a remote client (e.g., PC, cell phone, etc.) in a secure manner where the camera provides media session authentication credentials to the server. The camera initiates the SSL connection to the cloud and then acts as a RTSP server over this connection.
Embodiments include methods for using NAT traversal for connecting to the cloud for remote management and live video access allows the integrated security components to avoid port forwarding on the local router(s) and as a result maintain a more secure local network and a more secure camera since no ports are required to be open.
Embodiments enable camera sensors (e.g., motion, audio, heat, etc.) to serve as triggers to other actions in the automation system. The capture of video clips or snapshots from the camera is one such action, but the embodiments are not so limited.
A camera of an embodiment can be used by multiple systems.
A detailed description of flows follows relating to the camera tunnel of an embodiment.
A detailed description of camera startup and installation follows as it pertains to the camera tunnel of an embodiment.
Activation Key
To Configure Camera During Installation
returns other response code with error code description upon any failure.
To Reconfigure Wifi SSID and Key
A detailed description follows for additional flows relating to the camera tunnel of an embodiment.
Motion Detection
Embodiments of the integrated system described herein include installation or activation of a gateway device or device hardware of the iControl security system in a user's home. Under the iControl system, home device hardware units are deployed in the field and ultimately must be associated with a user of an integrated security system. The hardware device may reach a user through mail order fulfillment, e-commerce fulfillment, installer based delivery or brick and mortar sellers. The iControl security system does not know what device in the field may be associated with which user account. Nevertheless, installation of a security system must tie a user's account in the iControl system to the hardware device installed in a home.
A pairing of the device and user must occur to enable operation and functionality of the iControl security system. From the perspective of the security system, a random device is paired with a random account. A user may activate the iControl security system services using a PC based web browser where the PC is connected to a home router. The hardware device is then coupled to a home router and is assigned an IP address by the home router. Once connected to the home router, the hardware device contacts a provisioning server where the user is then forced to choose a service provider. The provisioning server then redirects the user's web client to a third party server of a service provider where user is presented with activation workflow of the provider. Under this embodiment, service provider may provide services including security, automation, elder care, and health care but embodiments are not so limited. Once a service provider has been selected, the iControl system matches the user's web client address to the address of the hardware device assigned by the home router. This matching depends under one embodiment upon the fact that that both addresses (i.e., address of the web client and address of the home device) originate from a common source address. The hardware device is then associated with the user (i.e., the iControl user account) without further information from or action by user.
Under an alternative embodiment, a user may attempt to activate the hardware device using a mobile phone that is not connected to the home network of the user. Under this embodiment, the mobile phone is not on the user's Wi-Fi network and uses a network address assigned by a cellular provider. Because the mobile phone is not on the Wi-Fi network together with the hardware device, the iControl system is not able to automatically match hardware device and user. The iControl system then prompts the user to manually inspect the device to find a code attached or affixed to the device itself. The user is prompted to enter the code located on the device. The user under this embodiment may select a service provider. The user is routed directly to a service provider server thereby bypassing the provisioning server. The iControl system uses the entered device code to associate the user with the hardware device.
Under either embodiment described above, matching of user and device hardware occurs after a selection of a service provider. The hardware device may be associated directly with a single provider or may provide user option to select one provider among a plurality of providers. The matching process may under an embodiment be dependent upon the user's account information being pre-loaded into a database of the iControl security system.
Once the pairing of device and user is accomplished, the user may then complete activation of iControl and/or service provider services from any client. As one example, a user initiates activation of security system services using a client behind a router where the hardware device is also coupled to the router. Once the iControl security system is able to pair the device and user (using IP matching under this embodiment), the user may complete enrollment procedures using a cell phone client outside the range of the user's home network.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Patent Application No. 61/791,397, filed Mar. 15, 2013. This application claims the benefit of U.S. Patent Application No. 61/782,345, filed Mar. 14, 2013. This application claims the benefit of U.S. Patent Application No. 61/802,077, filed Mar. 15, 2013. This application claims the benefit of U.S. Patent Application No. 61/777,061, filed Mar. 12, 2013. This application claims the benefit of U.S. Patent Application No. 61/778,853, filed Mar. 13, 2013. This application claims the benefit of U.S. Patent Application No. 61/779,028, filed Mar. 13, 2013. This application claims the benefit of U.S. Patent Application No. 61/779,753, filed Mar. 13, 2013. This application claims the benefit of U.S. Patent Application No. 61/780,092, filed Mar. 13, 2013. This application claims the benefit of U.S. Patent Application No. 61/780,290, filed Mar. 13, 2013. This application claims the benefit of U.S. Patent Application No. 61/780,435, filed Mar. 13, 2013. This application claims the benefit of U.S. Patent Application No. 61/780,538, filed Mar. 13, 2013. This application claims the benefit of U.S. Patent Application No. 61/780,637, filed Mar. 13, 2013. This application claims the benefit of U.S. Patent Application No. 61/781,401, filed Mar. 14, 2013. This application claims the benefit of U.S. Patent Application No. 61/781,713, filed Mar. 14, 2013. This application is a continuation in part application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/197,946, filed Aug. 25, 2008. This application is a continuation in part application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/718,851, filed Dec. 18, 2012. This application is a continuation in part application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/932,837, filed Jul. 1, 2013. This application is a continuation in part application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/761,745, filed Jun. 12, 2007. This application is a continuation in part application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/019,568, filed Jan. 24, 2008. This application is a continuation in part application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/925,181, filed Jun. 24, 2013. This application is a continuation in part application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/531,757, filed Jun. 25, 2012. This application is a continuation in part application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/335,279, filed Dec. 22, 2011. This application is a continuation in part application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/539,537, filed Aug. 11, 2009. This application is a continuation in part application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/750,470, filed Mar. 30, 2010. This application is a continuation in part application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/104,932, filed May 10, 2011.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 686838 | Richard | Nov 1901 | A |
| 1738540 | Replogle et al. | Dec 1929 | A |
| 3803576 | Dobrzanski et al. | Apr 1974 | A |
| 3852541 | Altenberger | Dec 1974 | A |
| 4006460 | Hewitt et al. | Feb 1977 | A |
| 4141006 | Braxton | Feb 1979 | A |
| 4257038 | Rounds et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
| 4286331 | Anderson et al. | Aug 1981 | A |
| 4304970 | Fahey et al. | Dec 1981 | A |
| 4363031 | Reinowitz | Dec 1982 | A |
| 4520503 | Kirst et al. | May 1985 | A |
| 4559526 | Tani et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
| 4559527 | Kirby | Dec 1985 | A |
| 4574305 | Campbell et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
| 4581606 | Mallory | Apr 1986 | A |
| 4591834 | Kyle | May 1986 | A |
| D284084 | Ferrara, Jr. | Jun 1986 | S |
| 4641127 | Hogan et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
| 4652859 | Van Wienen | Mar 1987 | A |
| 4670739 | Kelly, Jr. | Jun 1987 | A |
| 4683460 | Nakatsugawa | Jul 1987 | A |
| 4694282 | Tamura et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
| 4716973 | Cobern | Jan 1988 | A |
| 4730184 | Bach | Mar 1988 | A |
| 4754261 | Marino | Jun 1988 | A |
| 4779007 | Schlanger et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
| 4801924 | Burgmann et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
| 4812820 | Chatwin | Mar 1989 | A |
| 4818970 | Natale et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
| 4833339 | Luchaco et al. | May 1989 | A |
| 4833449 | Gaffigan | May 1989 | A |
| 4855713 | Brunius | Aug 1989 | A |
| 4860185 | Brewer et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
| 4887064 | Drori et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
| 4897630 | Nykerk | Jan 1990 | A |
| 4918623 | Lockitt et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
| 4918717 | Bissonnette et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
| 4951029 | Severson | Aug 1990 | A |
| 4959713 | Morotomi et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
| 4962473 | Crain | Oct 1990 | A |
| 4980666 | Hwang | Dec 1990 | A |
| 4993059 | Smith et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
| 4994787 | Kratt et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
| 5023901 | Sloan et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5083106 | Kostusiak et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5086385 | Launey et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
| 5091780 | Pomerleau | Feb 1992 | A |
| 5109278 | Erickson et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5132968 | Cephus | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5134644 | Garton et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5159315 | Schultz et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
| 5160879 | Tortola et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5164703 | Rickman | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5164979 | Choi | Nov 1992 | A |
| D337569 | Kando | Jul 1993 | S |
| 5227776 | Starefoss | Jul 1993 | A |
| 5237305 | Ishikuro et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5245694 | Zwern | Sep 1993 | A |
| 5280527 | Gullman et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5283816 | Gomez Diaz | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5299971 | Hart | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5319394 | Dukek | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5319698 | Glidewell et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5334974 | Simms et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5400011 | Sutton | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5406260 | Cummings et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5410343 | Coddington et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5412708 | Katz | May 1995 | A |
| 5414409 | Voosen et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5414833 | Hershey et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5428293 | Sinclair et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5438607 | Przygoda, Jr. et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5446445 | Bloomfield et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5448290 | Vanzeeland | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5452344 | Larson | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5465081 | Todd | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5471194 | Guscott | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5483224 | Rankin et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5486812 | Todd | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5499014 | Greenwaldt | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5499196 | Pacheco | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5510975 | Ziegler, Jr. | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5519878 | Dolin, Jr. | May 1996 | A |
| RE35268 | Frolov et al. | Jun 1996 | E |
| 5525966 | Parish | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5526428 | Arnold | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5534845 | Issa | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5541585 | Duhame et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5543778 | Stouffer | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5546072 | Creuseremee et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5546074 | Bernal et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5546447 | Skarbo et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5548646 | Aziz et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5550984 | Gelb | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5557254 | Johnson et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5570079 | Dockery | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5572438 | Ehlers et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5578989 | Pedtke | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5579197 | Mengelt et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5579221 | Mun | Nov 1996 | A |
| D377034 | Matsushita | Dec 1996 | S |
| 5587705 | Morris | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5598086 | Somerville | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5602918 | Chen et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5604493 | Behlke | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5606615 | Lapointe et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5621662 | Humphries et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5623601 | Vu | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5625338 | Pildner et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5625410 | Washino et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5629687 | Sutton et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5630216 | McEwan | May 1997 | A |
| 5631630 | McSweeney | May 1997 | A |
| 5638046 | Malinowski | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5651070 | Blunt | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5652567 | Traxler | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5675321 | McBride | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5680131 | Utz | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5682133 | Johnson et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5686885 | Bergman | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5686896 | Bergman | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5689235 | Sugimoto et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5689708 | Regnier et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5691697 | Carvalho et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5694335 | Hollenberg | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5694595 | Jacobs et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5696486 | Poliquin et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5696898 | Baker et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| D389501 | Mascarenas, Sr. et al. | Jan 1998 | S |
| 5706191 | Bassett et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5712679 | Coles | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5714933 | Le Van Suu | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5715394 | Jabs | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5717378 | Malvaso et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5717379 | Peters | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5717578 | Afzal | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5719551 | Flick | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5726912 | Krall et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5731756 | Roddy | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5736927 | Stebbins et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5737391 | Dame et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5748084 | Isikoff | May 1998 | A |
| 5748089 | Sizemore | May 1998 | A |
| 5757616 | May et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5761206 | Kackman | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5774051 | Kostusiak | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5777551 | Hess | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5777837 | Eckel et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5784461 | Shaffer et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5784463 | Chen et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5793028 | Wagener et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5793763 | Mayes et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5794128 | Brockel et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5796401 | Winer | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5798701 | Bernal et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5801618 | Jenkins | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5805056 | Mueller et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5805064 | Yorkey | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5809013 | Kackman | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5812054 | Cohen | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5819124 | Somner et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5844599 | Hildin | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5845070 | Ikudome | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5854588 | Dockery | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5859966 | Hayman et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5861804 | Fansa et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5867484 | Shaunfield | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5874952 | Morgan | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5877696 | Powell | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5880775 | Ross | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5881226 | Veneklase | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5886894 | Rakoff | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5892442 | Ozery | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5898831 | Hall et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5905438 | Weiss et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5907279 | Bruins et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5909183 | Borgstahl et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5914655 | Clifton et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5924069 | Kowalkowski et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5926209 | Glatt | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5933098 | Haxton | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5940387 | Humpleman | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5943394 | Ader et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5952815 | Rouillard et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5955946 | Beheshti et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5958053 | Denker | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5959528 | Right et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5963916 | Kaplan | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5967975 | Ridgeway | Oct 1999 | A |
| D416910 | Vasquez | Nov 1999 | S |
| 5982418 | Ely | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5991795 | Howard et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6002430 | McCall et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6009320 | Dudley | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6011921 | Takahashi et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6032036 | Maystre et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6037991 | Thro et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6038289 | Sands | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6040770 | Britton | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6049272 | Lee et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6049273 | Hess | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6049598 | Peters et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6052052 | Delmonaco | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6060994 | Chen | May 2000 | A |
| 6067346 | Akhteruzzaman et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6067440 | Diefes | May 2000 | A |
| 6069655 | Seeley et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6078253 | Fowler | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6078257 | Ferraro | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6078649 | Small et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6085030 | Whitehead et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6091771 | Seeley et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6094134 | Cohen | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6097429 | Seeley et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6104785 | Chen | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6107918 | Klein et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6107930 | Behlke et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6108034 | Kim | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6117182 | Alpert et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6124882 | Voois et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6134303 | Chen | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6134591 | Nickles | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6138249 | Nolet | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6139177 | Venkatraman et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6140987 | Stein et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6154133 | Ross et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6161182 | Nadooshan | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6167186 | Kawasaki et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6181341 | Shinagawa | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6192418 | Hale et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6198475 | Kunimatsu et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6198479 | Humpleman et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6208247 | Agre et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6209011 | Vong et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6211783 | Wang | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6215404 | Morales | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6218938 | Lin | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6219677 | Howard | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6226031 | Barraclough et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6229429 | Horon | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6239892 | Davidson | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6243683 | Peters | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6246320 | Monroe | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6271752 | Vaios | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6275227 | Destefano | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6281790 | Kimmel et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6282569 | Wallis et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6286038 | Reichmeyer et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6288716 | Humpleman et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6289382 | Bowman-Amuah | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6292766 | Mattos et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6292827 | Raz | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6295346 | Markowitz et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6314425 | Serbinis et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6320506 | Ferraro | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6323897 | Kogane et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| D451529 | Vasquez | Dec 2001 | S |
| 6331122 | Wu | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6332193 | Glass et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6347393 | Alpert et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6351213 | Hirsch et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6351595 | Kim | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6351829 | Dupont et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6353853 | Gravlin | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6353891 | Borella et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6359560 | Budge et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6363417 | Howard et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6363422 | Hunter et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6369695 | Horon | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6369705 | Kennedy | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6370436 | Howard et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6374079 | Hsu | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6377861 | York | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6378109 | Young et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6385772 | Courtney | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6392538 | Shere | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6400265 | Saylor et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6405348 | Fallah-Tehrani et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| D460472 | Wang | Jul 2002 | S |
| 6418037 | Zhang | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6421080 | Lambert | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6430629 | Smyers | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6433683 | Robinson | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6434700 | Alonso et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6437692 | Petite et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6442241 | Tsumpes | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6446192 | Narasimhan et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6452490 | Garland et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6452923 | Gerszberg et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6453687 | Sharood et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
| D464328 | Vasquez et al. | Oct 2002 | S |
| D464948 | Vasquez et al. | Oct 2002 | S |
| 6462507 | Fisher et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
| 6462663 | Wilson et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6467084 | Howard et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6476858 | Ramirez et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6480901 | Weber et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6493020 | Stevenson et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6496927 | McGrane et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6499131 | Savithri et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6504479 | Lemons et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6526581 | Edson | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6529230 | Chong | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6529723 | Bentley | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6542075 | Barker et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
| 6542992 | Peirce et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6553336 | Johnson et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6559769 | Anthony et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
| 6563800 | Salo et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6563910 | Menard et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
| 6567122 | Anderson et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6567502 | Zellner et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
| 6574234 | Myer et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6580950 | Johnson et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6587046 | Joao | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6587455 | Ray | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6587736 | Howard et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6591094 | Bentley | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6597703 | Li et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6601086 | Howard et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6603488 | Humpleman et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
| 6609127 | Lee et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6611206 | Eshelman et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
| 6615088 | Myer et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6621827 | Rezvani et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6624750 | Marman et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6631416 | Bendinelli et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
| 6636893 | Fong | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6643652 | Helgeson et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6643669 | Novak et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6648682 | Wu | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6658091 | Naidoo et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6661340 | Saylor et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6662340 | Rawat et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6667688 | Menard et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6675365 | Elzinga | Jan 2004 | B2 |
| 6680730 | Shields et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
| 6686838 | Rezvani et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6690411 | Naidoo et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6693530 | Dowens et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6693545 | Brown et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6697103 | Fernandez et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6704786 | Gupta et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6720990 | Walker et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
| 6721689 | Markle et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6721740 | Skinner et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
| 6721747 | Lipkin | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6727811 | Fendis | Apr 2004 | B1 |
| 6728688 | Hirsch et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
| 6738824 | Blair | May 2004 | B1 |
| 6741171 | Palka et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6754717 | Day, III et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6756896 | Ford | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6756998 | Bilger | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6762686 | Tabe | Jul 2004 | B1 |
| 6778085 | Faulkner et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6779019 | Mousseau et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 6781509 | Oppedahl et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 6785542 | Blight et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 6789147 | Kessler et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
| 6795322 | Aihara et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6795863 | Doty, Jr. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
| 6798344 | Faulkner et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6804638 | Fiedler | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6810409 | Fry et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
| 6826173 | Kung et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
| 6826233 | Oosawa | Nov 2004 | B1 |
| 6829478 | Layton et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
| 6834208 | Gonzales et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
| 6850252 | Hoffberg | Feb 2005 | B1 |
| 6856236 | Christensen et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6865690 | Kocin | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6871193 | Campbell et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
| 6873256 | Lemelson et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6885362 | Suomela | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| D504889 | Andre et al. | May 2005 | S |
| 6891838 | Petite et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
| 6912429 | Bilger | Jun 2005 | B1 |
| 6914533 | Petite | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6918112 | Bourke-Dunphy et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6920502 | Araujo et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6920615 | Campbell et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
| 6928148 | Simon et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6930599 | Naidoo et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6930730 | Maxon et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6931445 | Davis | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6941258 | Van Heijningen et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6943681 | Rezvani et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6956477 | Chun | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 6957186 | Guheen | Oct 2005 | B1 |
| 6957275 | Sekiguchi | Oct 2005 | B1 |
| 6959341 | Leung | Oct 2005 | B1 |
| 6959393 | Hollis et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 6963908 | Lynch et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
| 6963981 | Bailey et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
| 6965294 | Elliott et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
| 6965313 | Saylor et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
| 6970183 | Monroe | Nov 2005 | B1 |
| 6971076 | Chen | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6972676 | Kimmel et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
| 6975220 | Foodman et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
| 6977485 | Wei | Dec 2005 | B1 |
| 6983432 | Hayes | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 6990591 | Pearson | Jan 2006 | B1 |
| 6993658 | Engberg et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
| 6999992 | Deen et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
| 7015806 | Naidoo | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7016970 | Harumoto et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7019639 | Stilp | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7020697 | Goodman et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
| 7020701 | Gelvin et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
| 7023913 | Monroe | Apr 2006 | B1 |
| 7023914 | Furukawa et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7023975 | Mansfield et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7024676 | Klopfenstein | Apr 2006 | B1 |
| 7028328 | Kogane et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7030752 | Tyroler | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7032002 | Rezvani et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
| 7034681 | Yamamoto et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7035907 | Decasper et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
| 7039391 | Rezvani et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7043537 | Pratt | May 2006 | B1 |
| 7047088 | Nakamura et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7047092 | Wimsatt | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7050388 | Kim et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7053764 | Stilp | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7053765 | Clark | May 2006 | B1 |
| 7068164 | Duncan et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
| 7072934 | Helgeson et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7073140 | Li et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
| 7075429 | Marshall | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7079020 | Stilp | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7080046 | Rezvani et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
| 7081813 | Winick et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7082460 | Hansen et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7085814 | Gandhi et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
| 7085937 | Rezvani et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
| 7086018 | Ito | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7099944 | Anschutz et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
| 7099994 | Thayer et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7103152 | Naidoo et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7106176 | La et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7107322 | Freeny, Jr. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
| 7110774 | Davis et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
| 7113090 | Saylor et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
| 7113099 | Tyroler et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7114554 | Bergman et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7119609 | Naidoo et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7119674 | Sefton | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7120232 | Naidoo et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7120233 | Naidoo et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7126473 | Powell | Oct 2006 | B1 |
| 7130383 | Naidoo et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7130585 | Ollis et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
| 7134138 | Scherr | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7136711 | Duncan et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
| 7142503 | Grant et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
| 7148810 | Bhat | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7149798 | Rezvani et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7149814 | Neufeld et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7158026 | Feldkamp et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7158776 | Estes | Jan 2007 | B1 |
| 7158920 | Ishikawa | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7164907 | Cochran et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7166987 | Lee et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7171466 | Van Der Meulen | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7171686 | Jansen et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
| 7174564 | Weatherspoon et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
| 7180889 | Kung et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
| 7181207 | Chow et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
| 7181716 | Dahroug | Feb 2007 | B1 |
| 7183907 | Simon et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7184848 | Krzyzanowski et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7187986 | Johnson et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7203486 | Patel | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7209945 | Hicks et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7212570 | Akiyama et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7213061 | Hite et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
| 7218217 | Adonailo et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7222359 | Freund et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7237267 | Rayes et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7240327 | Singh et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7248150 | Mackjust et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7248161 | Spoltore et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7249317 | Nakagawa et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
| 7250854 | Rezvani et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7250859 | Martin et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7254779 | Rezvani et al. | Aug 2007 | B1 |
| 7262690 | Heaton et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7277010 | Joao | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7292142 | Simon et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
| 7298253 | Petricoin et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
| 7305461 | Ullman | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7310115 | Tanimoto | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7313102 | Stephenson | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| D558460 | Yu et al. | Jan 2008 | S |
| D558756 | Andre et al. | Jan 2008 | S |
| 7337217 | Wang | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7337473 | Chang et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7340314 | Duncan et al. | Mar 2008 | B1 |
| 7343619 | Ofek et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7346338 | Calhoun et al. | Mar 2008 | B1 |
| 7349682 | Bennett, III et al. | Mar 2008 | B1 |
| 7349761 | Cruse | Mar 2008 | B1 |
| 7349967 | Wang | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7356372 | Duncan et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
| 7359843 | Keller et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
| 7362221 | Katz | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7367045 | Ofek et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7370115 | Bae et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
| 7383339 | Meenan et al. | Jun 2008 | B1 |
| 7383522 | Murgai et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7403838 | Deen et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7409045 | Naidoo et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
| 7409451 | Meenan et al. | Aug 2008 | B1 |
| 7412447 | Hilbert et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
| 7425101 | Cheng | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7428585 | Owens, II et al. | Sep 2008 | B1 |
| 7430614 | Shen et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7437753 | Nahum | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7440434 | Chaskar et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7454731 | Oh et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7457869 | Kernan | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7466223 | Sefton | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7469139 | Van de Groenendaal | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7469294 | Luo et al. | Dec 2008 | B1 |
| 7469381 | Ording | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7469391 | Carrere et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| D584738 | Kim et al. | Jan 2009 | S |
| D585399 | Hwang | Jan 2009 | S |
| 7477629 | Tsirtsis | Jan 2009 | B2 |
| 7479949 | Jobs et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
| 7480713 | Ullman | Jan 2009 | B2 |
| 7480724 | Zimler et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
| 7493651 | Vaenskae et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 7498695 | Gaudreau et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7506052 | Qian et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7509687 | Ofek et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7511614 | Stilp et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7512965 | Amdur et al. | Mar 2009 | B1 |
| 7526539 | Hsu | Apr 2009 | B1 |
| 7526762 | Astala et al. | Apr 2009 | B1 |
| 7528723 | Fast et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7549134 | Li et al. | Jun 2009 | B1 |
| 7551071 | Bennett, III | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7554934 | Abraham et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7558379 | Winick | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7558903 | Kinstler | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7562323 | Bai et al. | Jul 2009 | B1 |
| 7568018 | Hove et al. | Jul 2009 | B1 |
| 7571459 | Ganesh et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7577420 | Srinivasan et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7587464 | Moorer et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7590953 | Chang | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7596622 | Owen et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| D602014 | Andre et al. | Oct 2009 | S |
| D602015 | Andre et al. | Oct 2009 | S |
| D602017 | Andre et al. | Oct 2009 | S |
| D602486 | Andre et al. | Oct 2009 | S |
| D602487 | Maskatia | Oct 2009 | S |
| 7606767 | Couper et al. | Oct 2009 | B1 |
| 7610555 | Klein et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 7619512 | Trundle et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7620427 | Shanahan | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7627665 | Barker et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7633385 | Cohn et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7634519 | Creamer et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7651530 | Winick | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| 7653911 | Doshi et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| 7671729 | Hershkovitz et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7679503 | Mason et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7681201 | Dale et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7697028 | Johnson | Apr 2010 | B1 |
| 7701970 | Krits et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| D615083 | Andre et al. | May 2010 | S |
| 7711796 | Gutt et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7720654 | Hollis | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7734020 | Elliot et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7734286 | Almeda et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7734906 | Orlando et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7739596 | Clarke-Martin et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7747975 | Dinter et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7751409 | Carolan | Jul 2010 | B1 |
| 7755506 | Clegg et al. | Jul 2010 | B1 |
| 7761275 | Chopra et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7787863 | Groenendaal | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7804760 | Schmukler et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| D624896 | Park et al. | Oct 2010 | S |
| D626437 | Lee et al. | Nov 2010 | S |
| 7827252 | Hopmann et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7847675 | Thyen et al. | Dec 2010 | B1 |
| 7855635 | Cohn et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7859404 | Chul Lee et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7882466 | Ishikawa | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7882537 | Okajo et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7884855 | Ortiz | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7890612 | Todd et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7890915 | Celik et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7899732 | Van Beaumont et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7904074 | Karaoguz et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7904187 | Hoffberg | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7911341 | Raji et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| D636769 | Wood et al. | Apr 2011 | S |
| 7921686 | Bagepalli et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| D637596 | Akana et al. | May 2011 | S |
| 7949960 | Roessler et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| D639805 | Song et al. | Jun 2011 | S |
| D640663 | Arnholt et al. | Jun 2011 | S |
| 7956736 | Cohn et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 7970863 | Fontaine | Jun 2011 | B1 |
| D641018 | Lee et al. | Jul 2011 | S |
| 7974235 | Ghozati et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| D642563 | Akana et al. | Aug 2011 | S |
| 8001219 | Moorer et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| D645015 | Lee et al. | Sep 2011 | S |
| D645435 | Kim et al. | Sep 2011 | S |
| D645833 | Seflic et al. | Sep 2011 | S |
| 8022833 | Cho | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8028041 | Olliphant et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8032881 | Holmberg et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8042049 | Killian et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8046411 | Hayashi et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8069194 | Manber | Nov 2011 | B1 |
| D650381 | Park et al. | Dec 2011 | S |
| 8073931 | Dawes et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8086702 | Baum et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8086703 | Baum et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| D654460 | Kim et al. | Feb 2012 | S |
| D654497 | Lee | Feb 2012 | S |
| 8122131 | Baum et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8125184 | Raji et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| D656137 | Chung et al. | Mar 2012 | S |
| 8140658 | Gelvin et al. | Mar 2012 | B1 |
| 8144836 | Naidoo et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8159519 | Kurtz et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8159945 | Muro et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8196064 | Krzyzanowski et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8200827 | Hunyady et al. | Jun 2012 | B1 |
| 8205181 | Singla et al. | Jun 2012 | B1 |
| 8209400 | Baum et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| D663298 | Song et al. | Jul 2012 | S |
| D664540 | Kim et al. | Jul 2012 | S |
| 8214494 | Slavin | Jul 2012 | B1 |
| 8214496 | Gutt et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| D664954 | Kim et al. | Aug 2012 | S |
| D666198 | Van Den Nieuwenhuizen et al. | Aug 2012 | S |
| 8239477 | Sharma et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| D667395 | Lee | Sep 2012 | S |
| D667396 | Koh | Sep 2012 | S |
| D667397 | Koh | Sep 2012 | S |
| D667398 | Koh | Sep 2012 | S |
| D667399 | Koh | Sep 2012 | S |
| 8269376 | Elberbaum | Sep 2012 | B1 |
| 8269623 | Addy et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8271881 | Moorer et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8272053 | Markham et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| D668650 | Han | Oct 2012 | S |
| D668651 | Kim et al. | Oct 2012 | S |
| D668652 | Kim et al. | Oct 2012 | S |
| D669469 | Kang | Oct 2012 | S |
| D670692 | Akana et al. | Nov 2012 | S |
| D671514 | Kim et al. | Nov 2012 | S |
| 8311526 | Forstall et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| D671938 | Hsu et al. | Dec 2012 | S |
| D672344 | Li | Dec 2012 | S |
| D672345 | Li | Dec 2012 | S |
| D672739 | Sin | Dec 2012 | S |
| D672768 | Huang et al. | Dec 2012 | S |
| 8335842 | Raji | Dec 2012 | B2 |
| 8335854 | Eldering | Dec 2012 | B2 |
| 8336010 | Chang et al. | Dec 2012 | B1 |
| D673561 | Hyun et al. | Jan 2013 | S |
| D673948 | Andre et al. | Jan 2013 | S |
| D673950 | Li et al. | Jan 2013 | S |
| D674369 | Jaewoong | Jan 2013 | S |
| D675203 | Yang | Jan 2013 | S |
| 8350694 | Trundle et al. | Jan 2013 | B1 |
| D675588 | Park | Feb 2013 | S |
| D675612 | Andre et al. | Feb 2013 | S |
| D676443 | Canizares et al. | Feb 2013 | S |
| D676819 | Choi | Feb 2013 | S |
| 8373313 | Garcia et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
| D677255 | McManigal et al. | Mar 2013 | S |
| D677640 | Kim et al. | Mar 2013 | S |
| D677659 | Akana et al. | Mar 2013 | S |
| D677660 | Groene et al. | Mar 2013 | S |
| D678271 | Chiu | Mar 2013 | S |
| D678272 | Groene et al. | Mar 2013 | S |
| D678877 | Groene et al. | Mar 2013 | S |
| 8400767 | Yeom et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| D679706 | Tang et al. | Apr 2013 | S |
| D680151 | Katori | Apr 2013 | S |
| D680524 | Feng et al. | Apr 2013 | S |
| D681032 | Akana et al. | Apr 2013 | S |
| 8413204 | White et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
| D681583 | Park | May 2013 | S |
| D681591 | Sung | May 2013 | S |
| D681632 | Akana et al. | May 2013 | S |
| D682239 | Yeh et al. | May 2013 | S |
| 8451986 | Cohn et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
| D684553 | Kim et al. | Jun 2013 | S |
| D684968 | Smith et al. | Jun 2013 | S |
| 8456293 | Trundle et al. | Jun 2013 | B1 |
| 8473619 | Baum et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
| D685778 | Fahrendorff et al. | Jul 2013 | S |
| D685783 | Bryan et al. | Jul 2013 | S |
| 8478450 | Lu et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 8478844 | Baum et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 8478871 | Gutt et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 8483853 | Lambourne | Jul 2013 | B1 |
| 8493202 | Trundle et al. | Jul 2013 | B1 |
| 8499038 | Vucurevich | Jul 2013 | B1 |
| 8520068 | Naidoo et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8520072 | Slavin et al. | Aug 2013 | B1 |
| 8525664 | Hadizad et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
| 8543665 | Ansari et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
| D692042 | Dawes et al. | Oct 2013 | S |
| 8570993 | Austin et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8584199 | Chen et al. | Nov 2013 | B1 |
| D695735 | Kitchen et al. | Dec 2013 | S |
| 8599018 | Kellen | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8612591 | Dawes et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8634533 | Strasters | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 8635350 | Gutt et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 8635499 | Cohn et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 8638211 | Cohn et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 8666560 | Lu et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
| 8675071 | Slavin et al. | Mar 2014 | B1 |
| 8713132 | Baum et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8730834 | Marusca et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
| 8738765 | Wyatt | May 2014 | B2 |
| 8812654 | Gelvin et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
| 8819178 | Baum et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
| 8825871 | Baum et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8836467 | Cohn et al. | Sep 2014 | B1 |
| 8885552 | Bedingfield, Sr. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
| 8902740 | Hicks, III | Dec 2014 | B2 |
| 8914526 | Lindquist et al. | Dec 2014 | B1 |
| 8935236 | Morita et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
| 8937658 | Hicks et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
| 8953479 | Hall et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
| 8953749 | Naidoo et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
| 8963713 | Dawes et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
| 8976763 | Shrestha et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 8988217 | Piccolo, III | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 8988221 | Raji et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 8996665 | Baum et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 9047753 | Dawes et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
| 9059863 | Baum et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
| 9100446 | Cohn et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
| 9141276 | Dawes et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
| 9144143 | Raji et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
| 9147337 | Cohn et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
| 9160784 | Jeong et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
| 9170707 | Laska et al. | Oct 2015 | B1 |
| 9172532 | Fuller et al. | Oct 2015 | B1 |
| 9172553 | Dawes et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
| 9172605 | Hardy et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
| 9189934 | Jentoft et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
| 9191228 | Fulker | Nov 2015 | B2 |
| 9202362 | Hyland et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
| 9246921 | Vlaminck et al. | Jan 2016 | B1 |
| 9287727 | Egan et al. | Mar 2016 | B1 |
| 9300921 | Naidoo et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
| 9306809 | Dawes et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
| 9412248 | Cohn et al. | Aug 2016 | B1 |
| 9426720 | Cohn et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
| 9450776 | Baum et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
| 9462041 | Hagins et al. | Oct 2016 | B1 |
| 9510065 | Cohn et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
| 9529344 | Hagins et al. | Dec 2016 | B1 |
| 9600945 | Naidoo et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
| 9609003 | Chmielewski et al. | Mar 2017 | B1 |
| 9613524 | Lamb et al. | Apr 2017 | B1 |
| 9621408 | Gutt et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
| 9729342 | Cohn et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
| 9779595 | Thibault | Oct 2017 | B2 |
| 9843458 | Cronin | Dec 2017 | B2 |
| 9876651 | Cho et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
| 9978238 | Fadell et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
| 9979625 | McLaughlin et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
| 20010016501 | King | Aug 2001 | A1 |
| 20010029585 | Simon et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20010030597 | Inoue et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20010034754 | Elwahab et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20010034759 | Chiles et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20010036192 | Chiles et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20010046366 | Susskind | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20010053207 | Jeon et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20010054115 | Ferguson et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20020004828 | Davis et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020005894 | Foodman et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020016639 | Smith et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020018057 | Sano | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020026476 | Miyazaki et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020026531 | Keane et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020027504 | Davis et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020028696 | Hirayama et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020029276 | Bendinelli et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020031120 | Rakib | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020037004 | Bossemeyer et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020038380 | Brawn et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020052719 | Alexander et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020052913 | Yamada et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020055977 | Nishi | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020059078 | Valdes et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020059148 | Rosenhaft et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020059637 | Rakib | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020068984 | Alexander et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020077077 | Rezvani et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020083342 | Webb et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020085488 | Kobayashi | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020091815 | Anderson et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020095490 | Barker et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020099809 | Lee | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020099829 | Richards et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020103898 | Moyer et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020103927 | Parent | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020107910 | Zhao | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020109580 | Shreve et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020111698 | Graziano et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020112051 | Ullman | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020112182 | Chang et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020114439 | Dunlap | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020116117 | Martens et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020118107 | Yamamoto et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020118796 | Menard et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020120696 | Mousseau et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020120790 | Schwalb | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020128728 | Murakami et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020131404 | Mehta | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020133539 | Monday | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020133578 | Wu | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020143805 | Hayes et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020143923 | Alexander | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020147982 | Naidoo et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020152298 | Kikta et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020156564 | Preston et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020163534 | Choi et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020163997 | Bergman et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020165006 | Haller et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020174367 | Kimmel et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020174434 | Lee et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020177428 | Menard et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020177482 | Cheong et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020178211 | Singhal et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020180579 | Nagaoka et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020184301 | Parent | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020184527 | Chun et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020191636 | Hallenbeck | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030005030 | Sutton et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030009552 | Benfield et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030009553 | Benfield et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030023839 | Burkhardt et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030025599 | Monroe | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030028398 | Yamashita et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030030548 | Kovacs et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030031165 | O'Brien | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030038730 | Imafuku et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030038849 | Craven et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030039242 | Moore | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030041137 | Horie et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030041167 | French et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030051009 | Shah et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030051026 | Carter et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030052905 | Gordon et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030052923 | Porter | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030056012 | Modeste et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030056014 | Verberkt et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030061344 | Monroe | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030061615 | Van Der Meulen | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030061621 | Petty et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030062997 | Naidoo et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030065407 | Johnson et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030065757 | Mentze et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030065791 | Garg et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030067923 | Ju et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030071724 | D'Amico | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030081768 | Caminschi | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030090473 | Joshi | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030096590 | Satoh | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030101459 | Edson | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030103088 | Dresti et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030112866 | Yu et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030113100 | Hecht et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030115345 | Chien et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030128115 | Giacopelli et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030132018 | Okita et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030137426 | Anthony et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030147534 | Ablay et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030149671 | Yamamoto et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030153325 | Veerepalli et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030155757 | Larsen et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030158635 | Pillar et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030159135 | Hiller et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030174154 | Yukie et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030174648 | Wang et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030177236 | Goto et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030182396 | Reich et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030182640 | Alani et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030184436 | Seales et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030187920 | Redkar | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030187938 | Mousseau et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030189509 | Hayes et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030197847 | Shinoda | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030200285 | Hansen et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030200325 | Krishnaswamy et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030201889 | Zulkowski | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030210126 | Kanazawa | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030217136 | Cho et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030225883 | Greaves et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20030230934 | Cordelli et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20030233155 | Slemmer et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20030233332 | Keeler et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20030236841 | Epshteyn | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20040003051 | Krzyzanowski et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040003241 | Sengodan et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040008724 | Devine et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040015572 | Kang | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040024851 | Naidoo et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040034798 | Yamada et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040036615 | Candela | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040037295 | Tanaka et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040041910 | Naidoo et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040054789 | Breh et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040068657 | Alexander et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040086088 | Naidoo et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040086090 | Naidoo et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040086093 | Schranz | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040093492 | Daude et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040103308 | Paller | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040107299 | Lee et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040113770 | Falk et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040113778 | Script et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040113937 | Sawdey et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040117330 | Ehlers et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040117462 | Bodin et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040117465 | Bodin et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040123149 | Tyroler | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040125146 | Gerlach et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040137915 | Diener et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040139227 | Takeda | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040143749 | Tajalli et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040155757 | Litwin et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040162902 | Davis | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040163073 | Krzyzanowski et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040163118 | Mottur | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040169288 | Hsieh et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040170155 | Omar et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040172396 | Vanska et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040177163 | Casey et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040181693 | Milliot et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040183756 | Freitas et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040189460 | Heaton et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040189871 | Kurosawa et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040196844 | Hagino | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040198386 | Dupray | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040199645 | Rouhi | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040201472 | McGunn et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040202351 | Park et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040212497 | Stilp | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040212503 | Stilp | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040215694 | Podolsky | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040215700 | Shenfield et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040215750 | Stilp | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040223605 | Donnelly | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040229569 | Franz | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040243835 | Terzis et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040243996 | Sheehy et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040246339 | Ooshima et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040249613 | Sprogis et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040249922 | Hackman et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040257433 | Lia et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040260407 | Wimsatt | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040260427 | Wimsatt | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040260527 | Stanculescu | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040263314 | Dorai et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040267385 | Lingemann | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040267937 | Klemets | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050010866 | Humpleman et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050015805 | Iwamura | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050021309 | Alexander et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050022210 | Zintel et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050023858 | Bingle et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050024203 | Wolfe | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050030928 | Virtanen et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050033513 | Gasbarro | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050038325 | Moll | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050038326 | Mathur | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050044061 | Klemow | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050052831 | Chen | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050055716 | Louie et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050057361 | Giraldo et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050060163 | Barsness et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050060411 | Coulombe et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050066045 | Johnson et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050066912 | Korbitz et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050069098 | Kalervo et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050079855 | Jethi et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050081161 | MacInnes et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050086126 | Patterson | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050086211 | Mayer | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050086366 | Luebke et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050088983 | Wesslen et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050089023 | Barkley et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050090915 | Geiwitz | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050091435 | Han et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050091696 | Wolfe et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050096753 | Arling et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050097478 | Killian et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050102152 | Hodges | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050108091 | Sotak et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050108369 | Sather et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050114900 | Ladd et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050119913 | Hornreich et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050120082 | Hesselink et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050125083 | Kiko | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050128068 | Winick et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050128083 | Puzio et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050128093 | Genova et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050144312 | Kadyk et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050148356 | Ferguson et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050149639 | Vrielink et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050149746 | Lu et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050154494 | Ahmed | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050155757 | Paton | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050156568 | Yueh | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050159823 | Hayes et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050159911 | Funk et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050169288 | Kamiwada et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050174229 | Feldkamp et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050184865 | Han | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050188315 | Campbell et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050197847 | Smith | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050200474 | Behnke | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050204076 | Cumpson et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050207429 | Akita et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050210532 | Winick | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050216302 | Raji et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050216580 | Raji et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050222820 | Chung | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050222933 | Wesby | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050231349 | Bhat | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050234568 | Chung et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050237182 | Wang | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050249199 | Albert et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050256608 | King et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050260973 | Van De Groenendaal | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050262241 | Gubbi et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050267605 | Lee et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050270151 | Winick | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050273831 | Slomovich et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050276389 | Hinkson et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050280964 | Richmond et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050285941 | Haigh et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060009863 | Lingemann | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060010078 | Rezvani et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060018328 | Mody et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060022816 | Yukawa | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060023847 | Tyroler et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060025132 | Karaoguz et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060031852 | Chu et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060045074 | Lee | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060050692 | Petrescu | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060050862 | Shen et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060051122 | Kawazu et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060053447 | Krzyzanowski et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060053491 | Khuti et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060063534 | Kokkonen et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060064305 | Alonso | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060064478 | Sirkin | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060067344 | Sakurai | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060067356 | Kim et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060067484 | Elliot et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060075235 | Renkis | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060077254 | Shu et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060078344 | Kawazu et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060080465 | Conzola et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060088092 | Chen et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060093365 | Dybsetter et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060101062 | Godman et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060103510 | Chen et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060103520 | Clark | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060104312 | Friar | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060105713 | Zheng et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060109113 | Reyes et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060111095 | Weigand | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060129837 | Im et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060132302 | Stilp | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060136558 | Sheehan et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060142880 | Deen et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060142968 | Han et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060143268 | Chatani | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060145842 | Stilp | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060154642 | Scannell, Jr. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060155851 | Ma et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060159032 | Ukrainetz et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060161270 | Luskin et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060161662 | Ng et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060161960 | Benoit | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060167784 | Hoffberg | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060168178 | Hwang et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060181406 | Petite et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060182100 | Li et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060183460 | Srinivasan et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060187900 | Akbar | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060190458 | Mishina et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060190529 | Morozumi et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060197660 | Luebke et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060200845 | Foster et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060206220 | Amundson | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060208872 | Yu et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060208880 | Funk et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060209857 | Hicks, III | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060215650 | Wollmershauser et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060218593 | Afshary et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060220830 | Bennett, III et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060222153 | Tarkoff et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060229746 | Ollis et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060230270 | Goffin | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060235963 | Wetherly et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060242395 | Fausak | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060245369 | Schimmelpfeng et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060246919 | Park et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060250235 | Astrin | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060258342 | Fok et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060265489 | Moore | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060271695 | Lavian | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060282886 | Gaug | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060288288 | Girgensohn et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060291507 | Sarosi et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060294565 | Walter | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070001818 | Small et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070002833 | Bajic | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070005736 | Hansen et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070005957 | Sahita et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070006177 | Aiber et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070043478 | Ehlers | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070043954 | Fox | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070047585 | Gillespie | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070052675 | Chang | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070055770 | Karmakar et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070058627 | Smith et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070061018 | Callaghan et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070061266 | Moore et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070061430 | Kim | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070061878 | Hagiu et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070063836 | Hayden et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070063866 | Webb | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070064714 | Bi et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070079151 | Connor et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070079385 | Williams et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070090944 | Du Breuil | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070096981 | Abraham | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070101345 | Takagi | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070103433 | Katz | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070106124 | Kuriyama et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070116020 | Cheever et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070117464 | Freeman | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070118609 | Mullan et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070130286 | Hopmann et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070140267 | Yang | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070142022 | Madonna et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070142044 | Fitzgerald et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070143440 | Reckamp et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070146484 | Horton et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070147419 | Tsujimoto et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070150616 | Baek et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070154010 | Wong | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070155325 | Bambic et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070160017 | Meier et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070162228 | Mitchell | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070162680 | Mitchell et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070168860 | Takayama et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070182543 | Luo | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070183345 | Fahim et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070185989 | Corbett et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070192486 | Wilson et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070198698 | Boyd et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070214262 | Buchbinder et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070216764 | Kwak | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070216783 | Ortiz et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070218895 | Saito et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070223465 | Wang et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070226182 | Sobotka et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070230415 | Malik | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070245223 | Siedzik et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070255856 | Reckamp et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070256105 | Tabe | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070257986 | Ivanov et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070260713 | Moorer et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070263782 | Stock et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070265866 | Fehling et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070271398 | Manchester et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070275703 | Lim et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070282665 | Buehler et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070283001 | Spiess et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070286210 | Gutt et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070286369 | Gutt et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070287405 | Radtke | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070288849 | Moorer et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070288858 | Pereira | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070290830 | Gurley | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070296814 | Cooper et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070298772 | Owens et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080001734 | Stilp et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080013957 | Akers et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080027587 | Nickerson et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080042826 | Hevia et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080048975 | Leibow | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080056261 | Osborn et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080059533 | Krikorian | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080059622 | Hite et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080065681 | Fontijn et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080072244 | Eker et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080074258 | Bennett et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080082186 | Hood et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080084294 | Zhiying et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080084296 | Kutzik et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080086564 | Putman et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080091793 | Diroo et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080102845 | Zhao | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080103608 | Gough | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080104215 | Excoffier et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080104516 | Lee | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080109302 | Salokannel | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080109650 | Shim et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080112340 | Luebke | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080112405 | Cholas et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080117029 | Dohrmann et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080117201 | Martinez et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080126535 | Zhu et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080129821 | Howarter et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080130949 | Ivanov et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080133725 | Shaouy | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080134343 | Pennington et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080141303 | Walker et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080141341 | Vinogradov et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080147834 | Quinn et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080155470 | Khedouri et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080163355 | Chu | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080168404 | Ording | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080170511 | Shorty et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080180240 | Raji et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080181239 | Wood et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080183483 | Hart | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080183842 | Raji et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080189609 | Larson et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080204219 | Cohn et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080209505 | Ghai et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080209506 | Ghai et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080215450 | Gates et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080219239 | Bell et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080221715 | Krzyzanowski et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080235326 | Parsi et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080235600 | Harper et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080239075 | Mehrotra et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080240372 | Frenette | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080240696 | Kucharyson | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080253391 | Krits et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080261540 | Rohani et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080266080 | Leung et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080266257 | Chiang | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080271150 | Boerger et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080284587 | Saigh et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080297599 | Donovan et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080313316 | Hite et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080316024 | Chantelou et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090007596 | Goldstein et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090019141 | Bush et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090036142 | Yan | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090041467 | Carleton et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090042649 | Hsieh et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090049488 | Stransky | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090055760 | Whatcott et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090063582 | Anna et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090066534 | Sivakkolundhu | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090066788 | Baum et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090066789 | Baum et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090067395 | Curtis et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090070436 | Dawes et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090070473 | Baum et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090070477 | Baum et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090070681 | Dawes et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090070682 | Dawes et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090070692 | Dawes et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090074184 | Baum et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090076211 | Yang et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090077167 | Baum et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090077622 | Baum et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090077623 | Baum et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090077624 | Baum et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090079547 | Oksanen et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090086660 | Sood et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090100329 | Espinoza | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090100492 | Hicks, III et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090113344 | Nesse et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090119397 | Neerdaels | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090125708 | Woodring et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090128365 | Laskin | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090134998 | Baum et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090138600 | Baum et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090138958 | Baum et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090146846 | Grossman | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090158189 | Itani | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090158292 | Rattner et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090161609 | Bergstrom | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090165114 | Baum et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090177906 | Paniagua, Jr. et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090187297 | Kish et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090193373 | Abbaspour et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090204693 | Andreev et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090221368 | Yen et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090224875 | Rabinowitz et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090228445 | Gangal | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090240730 | Wood | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090240787 | Denny | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090240814 | Brubacher et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090240946 | Yeap et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090256708 | Hsiao et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090259515 | Belimpasakis et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090260052 | Bathula et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090260430 | Zamfes | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090265042 | Mollenkopf et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090289787 | Dawson | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090303100 | Zemany | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090307255 | Park | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090313693 | Rogers | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090322510 | Berger et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090324010 | Hou | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100000791 | Alberty | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100001812 | Kausch | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100008274 | Kneckt et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100023865 | Fulker et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100026487 | Hershkovitz | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100030578 | Siddique et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100030810 | Marr | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100052612 | Raji et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100066530 | Cohn et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100067371 | Gogic et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100074112 | Derr et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100077111 | Holmes et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100082744 | Raji et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100095111 | Gutt et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100095369 | Gutt et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100102951 | Rutledge | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100121521 | Kiribayashi | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100122091 | Huang et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100138758 | Mizumori et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100138764 | Hatambeiki et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100145485 | Duchene et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100153853 | Dawes et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100159898 | Krzyzanowski et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100159967 | Pounds et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100164736 | Byers et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100177749 | Essinger et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100177750 | Essinger et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100185857 | Neitzel et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100197219 | Issa et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100204839 | Behm et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100210240 | Mahaffey et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100212012 | Touboul et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100218104 | Lewis | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100238286 | Boghossian et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100241711 | Ansari et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100245107 | Fulker et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100248681 | Phills | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100267390 | Lin et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100274366 | Fata et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100277300 | Cohn et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100277302 | Cohn et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100277315 | Cohn et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100280635 | Cohn et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100280637 | Cohn et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100281135 | Cohn et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100281161 | Cohn et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100281312 | Cohn et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100298024 | Choi | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100321151 | Matsuura et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100325107 | Kenton et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100332164 | Aisa et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110000521 | Tachibana | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110029875 | Milch | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110040415 | Nickerson et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110040877 | Foisy | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110093799 | Hatambeiki et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110096678 | Ketonen | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110102588 | Trundle et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110125333 | Gray | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110125846 | Ham et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110128378 | Raji | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110156914 | Sheharri et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110197327 | McElroy et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110200052 | Mungo et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110230160 | Felgate | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110234392 | Cohn et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110257953 | Li et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110283006 | Ramamurthy | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110286437 | Austin et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110309929 | Myers | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120016607 | Cottrell et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120023151 | Bennett, III et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120062026 | Dawes | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120062370 | Feldstein et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120066608 | Fulker | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120066632 | Fulker | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120081842 | Ewing et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120154126 | Kitchen | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120154138 | Cohn et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120182245 | Hutton | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120209951 | Enns et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120232788 | Diao | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120242788 | Chuang et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120257061 | Edwards et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120260184 | Dawes et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120265892 | Ma et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120278877 | Baum et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120296486 | Marriam et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120309354 | Du | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20120315848 | Smith et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20120327242 | Barley et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20120331109 | Wood | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20130007871 | Meenan et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130082835 | Shapiro et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130115972 | Ziskind et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130120134 | Hicks, III | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130136102 | MacWan et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130154822 | Kumar et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130174239 | Kim et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130183924 | Saigh et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130191755 | Balog et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130218959 | Sa et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130222133 | Schultz et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130223279 | Tinnakornsrisuphap et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130261821 | Lu et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130266193 | Tiwari et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130314542 | Jackson | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130318231 | Gutt | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130318443 | Bachman et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130331109 | Dhillon et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20140035726 | Schoner et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140075464 | McCrea | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140098247 | Rao et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140112405 | Jafarian et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140126425 | Burd et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140136936 | Patel et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140140575 | Wolf | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140143695 | Fulker | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140143851 | Dawes | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140143854 | Lopez et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140146171 | Brady et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140153695 | Yanagisawa et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140167928 | Burd | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140172957 | Dawes | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140176797 | Silva et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140180968 | Song et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140201291 | Russell | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140218517 | Kim et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140278281 | Vaynriber et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140282934 | Miasnik et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140289384 | Kao et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140293046 | Ni | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140340216 | Puskarich | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20140355588 | Cho et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20140359101 | Dawes et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20140368331 | Quain | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20140369584 | Fan et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20140372599 | Gutt et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20140372811 | Cohn et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20150009325 | Kardashov | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150054947 | Dawes | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150074206 | Baldwin | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150077553 | Dawes | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150082414 | Dawes | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150088982 | Johnson et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150097949 | Ure et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150097961 | Ure et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150106721 | Cha et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150116108 | Fadell et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150142991 | Zaloom | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150161875 | Cohn et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| 20150205465 | Robison et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20150222517 | McLaughlin et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20150325106 | Dawes et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
| 20150331662 | Lambourne | Nov 2015 | A1 |
| 20150334087 | Dawes | Nov 2015 | A1 |
| 20150348554 | Orr et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20150350031 | Burks et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20150365217 | Scholten et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20150373149 | Lyons | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20160012715 | Raji et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
| 20160019763 | Raji et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
| 20160019778 | Raji et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
| 20160023475 | Bevier et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
| 20160027295 | Raji et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
| 20160036944 | Kitchen et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
| 20160062624 | Sundermeyer et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
| 20160065413 | Sundermeyer et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
| 20160065414 | Sundermeyer et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
| 20160100348 | Cohn et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
| 20160164923 | Dawes | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20160171853 | Naidoo et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20160183073 | Saito et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20160189509 | Malhotra et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20160189527 | Peterson et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20160191265 | Cohn et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20160191621 | Oh et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20160226732 | Kim et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
| 20160231916 | Dawes | Aug 2016 | A1 |
| 20160232780 | Cohn et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
| 20160234075 | Sirpal et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
| 20160260135 | Zomet et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
| 20160261932 | Fadell et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
| 20160267751 | Fulker et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
| 20160269191 | Cronin | Sep 2016 | A1 |
| 20160274759 | Dawes | Sep 2016 | A1 |
| 20160364089 | Blackman et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
| 20160373453 | Ruffner et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
| 20170005818 | Gould | Jan 2017 | A1 |
| 20170006107 | Dawes et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
| 20170052513 | Raji et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
| 20170054571 | Kitchen et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
| 20170054594 | Dawes | Feb 2017 | A1 |
| 20170063967 | Kitchen et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
| 20170063968 | Kitchen et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
| 20170068419 | Sundermeyer et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
| 20170070361 | Sundermeyer et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
| 20170070563 | Sundermeyer et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
| 20170078298 | Vlaminck et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
| 20170103646 | Naidoo et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
| 20170109999 | Cohn et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
| 20170118037 | Kitchen et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
| 20170154507 | Dawes et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
| 20170155545 | Baum et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
| 20170180198 | Dawes | Jun 2017 | A1 |
| 20170180306 | Gutt et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
| 20170185277 | Sundermeyer et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
| 20170185278 | Sundermeyer et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
| 20170192402 | Karp et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
| 20170227965 | Decenzo et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
| 20170244573 | Baum et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
| 20170255452 | Barnes et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
| 20170257257 | Dawes | Sep 2017 | A1 |
| 20170279629 | Raji | Sep 2017 | A1 |
| 20170289360 | Baum et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
| 20170301216 | Cohn et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
| 20170302469 | Cohn et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
| 20170310500 | Dawes | Oct 2017 | A1 |
| 20170331781 | Gutt et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
| 20170337806 | Cohn et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
| 20170353324 | Baum et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
| 20180004377 | Kitchen et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
| 20180019890 | Dawes | Jan 2018 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2005223267 | Dec 2010 | AU |
| 2005223267 | Dec 2010 | AU |
| 2010297957 | May 2012 | AU |
| 2011250886 | Jan 2013 | AU |
| 2011250886 | Jan 2013 | AU |
| 2011305163 | May 2013 | AU |
| 2013284428 | Feb 2015 | AU |
| 2010297957 | Oct 2016 | AU |
| 2011305163 | Dec 2016 | AU |
| 1008939 | Oct 1996 | BE |
| 2203813 | Jun 1996 | CA |
| 2174482 | Oct 1997 | CA |
| 2346638 | Apr 2000 | CA |
| 2389958 | Mar 2003 | CA |
| 2878117 | Jan 2014 | CA |
| 2559842 | May 2014 | CA |
| 2559842 | May 2014 | CA |
| 2992429 | Dec 2016 | CA |
| 102834818 | Dec 2012 | CN |
| 102985915 | Mar 2013 | CN |
| 0295146 | Dec 1988 | EP |
| 0308046 | Mar 1989 | EP |
| 0591585 | Apr 1994 | EP |
| 1117214 | Jul 2001 | EP |
| 1119837 | Aug 2001 | EP |
| 0978111 | Nov 2001 | EP |
| 2112784 | Oct 2009 | EP |
| 2868039 | May 2015 | EP |
| 3031206 | Jun 2016 | EP |
| 1738540 | Oct 2017 | EP |
| 2584217 | Jan 1987 | FR |
| 2661023 | Oct 1991 | FR |
| 2793334 | Nov 2000 | FR |
| 2222288 | Feb 1990 | GB |
| 2273593 | Jun 1994 | GB |
| 2286423 | Aug 1995 | GB |
| 2291554 | Jan 1996 | GB |
| 2319373 | May 1998 | GB |
| 2320644 | Jun 1998 | GB |
| 2324630 | Oct 1998 | GB |
| 2325548 | Nov 1998 | GB |
| 2335523 | Sep 1999 | GB |
| 2349293 | Oct 2000 | GB |
| 2370400 | Jun 2002 | GB |
| 2428821 | Feb 2007 | GB |
| 2442628 | Apr 2008 | GB |
| 2442628 | Apr 2008 | GB |
| 2442633 | Apr 2008 | GB |
| 2442633 | Apr 2008 | GB |
| 2442640 | Apr 2008 | GB |
| 2442640 | Apr 2008 | GB |
| 2428821 | May 2008 | GB |
| 2428821 | Jun 2008 | GB |
| 63-033088 | Feb 1988 | JP |
| 05-167712 | Jul 1993 | JP |
| 06-339183 | Dec 1993 | JP |
| 08-227491 | Sep 1996 | JP |
| 8227491 | Sep 1996 | JP |
| 10-004451 | Jan 1998 | JP |
| 2000-006343 | Jan 2000 | JP |
| 2000-023146 | Jan 2000 | JP |
| 2000-278671 | Oct 2000 | JP |
| 2001-006088 | Jan 2001 | JP |
| 2001-006343 | Jan 2001 | JP |
| 2001-069209 | Mar 2001 | JP |
| 2002055895 | Feb 2002 | JP |
| 2002-185629 | Jun 2002 | JP |
| 2003085258 | Mar 2003 | JP |
| 2003141659 | May 2003 | JP |
| 2004192659 | Jul 2004 | JP |
| 2007-529826 | Oct 2007 | JP |
| 20060021605 | Mar 2006 | KR |
| 340934 | Sep 1998 | TW |
| I239176 | Sep 2005 | TW |
| I480839 | Apr 2015 | TW |
| I480840 | Apr 2015 | TW |
| I509579 | Nov 2015 | TW |
| I517106 | Jan 2016 | TW |
| WO-8907855 | Aug 1989 | WO |
| 8911187 | Nov 1989 | WO |
| WO-9403881 | Feb 1994 | WO |
| 9513944 | May 1995 | WO |
| WO-9636301 | Nov 1996 | WO |
| 9713230 | Apr 1997 | WO |
| 9825243 | Jun 1998 | WO |
| 9852343 | Nov 1998 | WO |
| WO-9849663 | Nov 1998 | WO |
| 9859256 | Dec 1998 | WO |
| WO-9934339 | Jul 1999 | WO |
| WO 0036812 | Jun 2000 | WO |
| 0072598 | Nov 2000 | WO |
| 0111586 | Feb 2001 | WO |
| WO-0152478 | Jul 2001 | WO |
| 0171489 | Sep 2001 | WO |
| WO-0199078 | Dec 2001 | WO |
| 0211444 | Feb 2002 | WO |
| WO-0221300 | Mar 2002 | WO |
| 2002100083 | Dec 2002 | WO |
| WO-02097584 | Dec 2002 | WO |
| 2003026305 | Mar 2003 | WO |
| WO-03040839 | May 2003 | WO |
| WO-2004004222 | Jan 2004 | WO |
| WO-2004098127 | Nov 2004 | WO |
| WO-2004107710 | Dec 2004 | WO |
| WO-2005091218 | Sep 2005 | WO |
| WO-2005091218 | Jul 2006 | WO |
| WO-2007038872 | Apr 2007 | WO |
| WO-2007124453 | Nov 2007 | WO |
| 2008056320 | May 2008 | WO |
| WO-2009006670 | Jan 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009023647 | Feb 2009 | WO |
| 2009029597 | Mar 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009029590 | Mar 2009 | WO |
| 2009064795 | May 2009 | WO |
| WO-2009145747 | Dec 2009 | WO |
| WO 2010019624 | Feb 2010 | WO |
| 2010025468 | Mar 2010 | WO |
| 2010127009 | Nov 2010 | WO |
| 2010127194 | Nov 2010 | WO |
| 2010127200 | Nov 2010 | WO |
| 2010127203 | Nov 2010 | WO |
| WO 2011038409 | Mar 2011 | WO |
| 2011063354 | May 2011 | WO |
| WO 2011143273 | Nov 2011 | WO |
| WO 2012040653 | Mar 2012 | WO |
| 2014004911 | Jan 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014004911 | Jan 2014 | WO |
| 2015021469 | Feb 2015 | WO |
| 2015134520 | Sep 2015 | WO |
| 2016201033 | Dec 2016 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Alarm.com—Interactive Security Systems, Elders [retrieved on Nov. 4, 2003], 1 page. |
| Alarm.com—Interactive Security Systems, Frequently Asked Questions [retrieved on Nov. 4, 2003], 3 pages. |
| Alarm.com—Interactive Security Systems, Overview [retrieved on Nov. 4, 2003], 2 pages. |
| Alarm.com—Interactive Security Systems, Product Advantages [retrieved on Nov. 4, 2003], 3 pages. |
| Australian Patent App. No. 2010297957. |
| Australian Patent App. No. 2011250886. |
| Australian Patent App. No. 2011305163. |
| Canadian Patent App. No. 2559842. |
| Chinese Patent App. No. 201080053845.7. |
| Chinese Patent App. No. 201180034090.0. |
| Control Panel Standard—Features for False Alarm Reduction, The Security Industry Association, SIA 2009, pp. 1-48. |
| Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 11/761,745, filed Jun. 12, 2007. |
| Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/019,568, filed Jan. 24, 2008. |
| Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/189,780, filed Aug. 11, 2008. |
| Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/189,785, filed Aug. 11, 2008. |
| Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/197,931, filed Aug. 25, 2008. |
| Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/197,946, filed Aug. 25, 2008. |
| Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/197,958, filed Aug. 25, 2008. |
| Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/198,039, filed Aug. 25, 2008. |
| Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/198,051, filed Aug. 25, 2008. |
| Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/198,060, filed May 28, 2008. |
| Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/198,066, filed Aug. 25, 2008. |
| Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/269,735, filed Nov. 12, 2008. |
| Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/539,537, filed Aug. 11, 2009. |
| Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/568,718, filed Sep. 29, 2009. |
| Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/630,092, filed Dec. 3, 2009. |
| Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/691,992, filed Jan. 22, 2010. |
| Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/718,385, filed Mar. 5, 2010. |
| Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/732,879, filed Mar. 26, 2010. |
| Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/750,470, filed Mar. 30, 2010. |
| Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/770,253, filed Apr. 29, 2010. |
| Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/770,365, filed Apr. 29, 2010. |
| Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/771,071, filed Apr. 30, 2010. |
| Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/771,372, filed Apr. 30, 2010. |
| Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/771,471, filed Apr. 30, 2010. |
| Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/771,624, filed Apr. 30, 2010. |
| Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/892,303, filed Sep. 28, 2010. |
| Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/892,801, filed Sep. 28, 2010. |
| Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/952,080, filed Nov. 22, 2010. |
| Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/970,313, filed Dec. 16, 2010. |
| Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/971,282, filed Dec. 17, 2010. |
| Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/972,740, filed Dec. 20, 2010. |
| Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/099,293, filed May 2, 2011. |
| Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/104,932, filed May 10, 2011. |
| Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/104,936, filed May 10, 2011. |
| Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/153,807, filed Jun. 6, 2011. |
| Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/244,008, filed Sep. 23, 2011. |
| Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/311,365, filed Dec. 5, 2011. |
| Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/334,998, filed Dec. 22, 2011. |
| Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/335,279, filed Dec. 22, 2011. |
| Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/400,477, filed Dec. 22, 2011. |
| Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/406,264, filed Feb. 27, 2012. |
| Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/486,276, filed Jun. 1, 2012. |
| Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/531,757, filed Jun. 25, 2012. |
| Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/718,851, filed Dec. 18, 2012. |
| Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/725,607, filed Dec. 21, 2012. |
| Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/925,181, filed Jun. 24, 2013. |
| Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/929,568, filed Jun. 27, 2013. |
| Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/932,816, filed Jul. 1, 2013. |
| Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/932,837, filed Jul. 1, 2013. |
| Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 29/419,628, filed Apr. 30, 2012. |
| Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 29/420,377, filed May 8, 2012. |
| European Patent App. No. 05725743.8. |
| European Patent App. No. 08797646.0. |
| European Patent App. No. 08828613.3. |
| European Patent App. No. 09807196.2. |
| European Patent App. No. 10819658.5. |
| European Patent App. No. 11781184.4. |
| European Patent App. No. 11827671.6. |
| Examination Report under Section 18(3) re for UK Patent Application No. GB0620362.4, dated Aug. 13, 2007. |
| Examination Report under Section 18(3) re for UK Patent Application No. GB0724248.0, dated Jun. 4, 2008. |
| Examination Report under Section 18(3) re for UK Patent Application No. GB0724248.0, dated Jan. 30, 2008. |
| Examination Report under Section 18(3) re for UK Patent Application No. GB0724760.4, dated Jan. 30, 2008. |
| Examination Report under Section 18(3) re for UK Patent Application No. GB0800040.8, dated Jan. 30, 2008. |
| Faultline, “AT&T Targets Video Home Security as Next Broadband Market,” The Register, Nov. 2, 2006, 2 pages. |
| Final Office Action dated Aug. 1, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/630,092, filed Dec. 3, 2009. |
| Final Office Action dated Jun. 1, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/084,232, filed Mar. 16, 2005. |
| Final Office Action mailed Jun. 5, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/771,071, filed Apr. 30, 2010. |
| Final Office Action dated May 9, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/189,780, filed Aug. 11, 2008. |
| Final Office Action dated May 9, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/952,080, filed Nov. 22, 2010. |
| Final Office Action dated Jan. 10, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/189,785, filed Aug. 11, 2008. |
| Final Office Action dated Jun. 10, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/084,232, filed Mar. 16, 2005. |
| Final Office Action dated Jul. 12, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/019,554, filed Jan. 24, 2008. |
| Final Office Action dated Jan. 13, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/189,780, filed Aug. 11, 2008. |
| Final Office Action dated Sep. 14, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/197,931, filed Aug. 25, 2008. |
| Final Office Action dated Feb. 16, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/019,568, filed Jan. 24, 2008. |
| Final Office Action dated Oct. 17, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/637,671, filed Dec. 14, 2009. |
| Final Office Action dated Sep. 17, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/197,958, filed Aug. 25, 2008. |
| Final Office Action dated Mar. 21, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/691,992, filed Jan. 22, 2010. |
| Final Office Action dated Jul. 23, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/531,757, filed Jun. 25, 2010. |
| Final Office Action dated Feb. 26, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/771,471, filed Apr. 30, 2010. |
| Final Office Action dated Jun. 29, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/539,537, filed Aug. 11, 2009. |
| Final Office Action dated Dec. 31, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/770,365, filed Apr. 29, 2010. |
| Final Office Action dated Oct. 31, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/771,624, filed Apr. 30, 2010. |
| Form PCT/ISA/210, “PCT International Search Report for the Application No. PCT/US05/08766,” dated May 23, 2006, 2 pages. |
| Form PCT/ISA/210, “PCT International Search Report for the Application No. PCT/US08/72831,” dated Nov. 4, 2008, 2 pages. |
| Form PCT/ISA/210, “PCT International Search Report for the Application No. PCT/US08/74246,” dated Nov. 14, 2008, 2 pages. |
| Form PCT/ISA/210, “PCT International Search Report for the Application No. PCT/US08/74260,” dated Nov. 13, 2008, 2 pages. |
| Form PCT/ISA/210, “PCT International Search Report for the Application No. PCT/US09/53485,” dated Oct. 22, 2009, 2 pages. |
| Form PCT/ISA/210, “PCT International Search Report for the Application No. PCT/US09/55559,” dated Nov. 12, 2009, 2 pages. |
| Form PCT/ISA/210, “PCT International Search Report for the Application No. PCT/US10/50585,” dated Dec. 30, 2010, 2 pages. |
| Form PCT/ISA/210, “PCT International Search Report for the Application No. PCT/US10/57674,” dated Mar. 2, 2011, 2 pages. |
| Form PCT/ISA/210, “PCT International Search Report for the Application No. PCT/US11/34858,” dated Oct. 3, 2011, 2 pages. |
| Form PCT/ISA/210, “PCT International Search Report for the Application No. PCT/US11/35994,” dated Sep. 28, 2011, 2 pages. |
| Form PCT/ISA/210, “PCT International Search Report for the Application No. PCT/US11/53136,” dated Jan. 5, 2012, 2 pages. |
| Form PCT/ISA/210, “PCT International Search Report of the Application No. PCT/US08/83254,” dated Jan. 14, 2009, 2 pages. |
| Form PCT/ISA/220, “PCT Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration,” 1 pg. |
| Form PCT/ISA/220, “PCT Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration for the Application No. PCT/US05/08766,” dated May 23, 2006, 1 page. |
| Form PCT/ISA/220, “PCT Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration for the Application No. PCT/US08/72831,” dated Nov. 4, 2008, 1 page. |
| Form PCT/ISA/220, “PCT Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration for the Application No. PCT/US08/74246” dated Nov. 14, 2008, 1 page. |
| Form PCT/ISA/220, “PCT Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration for the Application No. PCT/US08/74260,” dated Nov. 13, 2008, 1 page. |
| Form PCT/ISA/220, “PCT Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration for the Application No. PCT/US09/53485,” dated Oct. 22, 2009, 1 page. |
| Form PCT/ISA/220, “PCT Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration for the Application No. PCT/US09/55559,” dated Nov. 12, 2009, 1 page. |
| Form PCT/ISA/220, “PCT Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration for the Application No. PCT/US10/50585,” dated Dec. 30, 2010, 1 page. |
| Form PCT/ISA/220, “PCT Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration for the Application No. PCT/US10/57674,” dated Mar. 2, 2011, 1 page. |
| Form PCT/ISA/220, “PCT Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration for the Application No. PCT/US11/35994,” dated Sep. 28, 2011, 1 page. |
| Form PCT/ISA/220, “PCT Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration of the Application No. PCT/US08/83254,” dated Jan. 14, 2009, 1 page. |
| Form PCT/ISA/237, “PCT Written Opinion ofthe International Searching Authority for the Application No. PCT/US05/08766,” dated May 23, 2006, 5 pages. |
| Form PCT/ISA/237, “PCT Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority,” 6 pgs. |
| Form PCT/ISA/237, “PCT Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for the Application No. PCT/US08/72831,” dated Nov. 4, 2008, 6 pages. |
| Form PCT/ISA/237, “PCT Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for the Application No. PCT/US08/74246,” dated Nov. 14, 2008, 6 pages. |
| Form PCT/ISA/237, “PCT Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for the Application No. PCT/US08/74260,” dated Nov. 13, 2008, 6 pages. |
| Form PCT/ISA/237, “PCT Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for the Application No. PCT/US09/53485,” dated Oct. 22, 2009, 8 pages. |
| Form PCT/ISA/237, “PCT Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for the Application No. PCT/US09/55559,” dated Nov. 12, 2009, 6 pages. |
| Form PCT/ISA/237, “PCT Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for the Application No. PCT/US10/50585,” dated Dec. 30, 2010, 7 pages. |
| Form PCT/ISA/237, “PCT Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for the Application No. PCT/US10/57674,” dated Mar. 2, 2011, 6 pages. |
| Form PCT/ISA/237, “PCT Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for the Application No. PCT/US11/34858,” dated Oct. 3, 2011, 8 pages. |
| Form PCT/ISA/237, “PCT Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for the Application No. PCT/US11/35994,” dated Sep. 28, 2011, 11 pages. |
| Form PCT/ISA/237, “PCT Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for the Application No. PCT/US11/53136,” dated Jan. 5, 2012. |
| Form PCT/ISA/237, “PCT Written Opinion ofthe International Searching Authority of the Application No. PCT/US08/83254,” dated Jan. 14, 2009, 7 pages. |
| Gutierrez J.A., “On the Use of IEEE 802.15.4 to Enable Wireless Sensor Networks in Building Automation,” Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC), 15th IEEE International Symposium, 2004, vol. 3, pp. 1865-1869. |
| Indian Patent App. No. 10698/DELNP/2012. |
| Indian Patent App. No. 3687/DELNP/2012. |
| International Patent Application No. PCT/US2013/048324. |
| International Search Report for Application No. PCT/US13/48324, dated Jan. 14, 2014, 2 pages. |
| International Search Report for Application No. PCT/US2014/050548, dated Mar. 18, 2015, 4 pages. |
| Lagotek Wireless Home Automation System, May 2006 [retrieved on Aug. 22, 2012]. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Apr. 4, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/197,931, filed Aug. 25, 2008. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Mar. 4, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/400,477, filed Feb. 20, 2012. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Jan. 5, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/019,554, filed Jan. 24, 2008. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated May 5, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/189,780, filed Aug. 11, 2008. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated May 5, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/189,785, filed Aug. 11, 2008. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Feb. 7, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/637,671, filed Dec. 14, 2009. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Feb. 7, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/970,313, filed Dec. 16, 2010. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Feb. 8, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/630,092, filed Dec. 3, 2009. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Apr. 9, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/771,624, filed Apr. 30, 2010. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Dec. 9, 2008 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/084,232, filed Mar. 16, 2005. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Aug. 10, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/771,471, filed Apr. 30, 2010. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Oct. 11, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/019,568, filed Jan. 24, 2008. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Apr. 12, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/770,365, filed Apr. 29, 2010. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Jul. 12, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/691,992, filed Jan. 22, 2010. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Oct. 12, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/630,092, filed Dec. 3, 2009. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Sep. 12, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/952,080, filed Nov. 22, 2010. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Apr. 13, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/761,745, filed Jun. 12, 2007. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Jul. 13, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/019,568, filed Jan. 24, 2008. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Nov. 14, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/531,757, filed Jun. 25, 2012. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Sep. 14, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/084,232, filed Mar. 16, 2005. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Sep. 16, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/539,537, filed Aug. 11, 2009. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Sep. 17, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/189,780, filed Aug. 11, 2008. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Aug. 18, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/197,958, filed Aug. 25, 2008. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Feb. 18, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/630,092, filed Dec. 3, 2009. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Jan. 18, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/771,071, filed Apr. 30, 2010. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Feb. 21, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/771,372, filed Apr. 30, 2010. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Jul. 21, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/630,092, filed Dec. 3, 2009. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Dec. 22, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/197,931, filed Aug. 25, 2008. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Jul. 22, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/630,092, filed Dec. 3, 2009. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated May 23, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/104,932, filed May 10, 2011. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated May 23, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/104,936, filed May 10, 2011. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Jan. 26, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/019,568, filed Jan. 24, 2008. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Nov. 26, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/197,958, filed Aug. 25, 2008. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Jun. 27, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/019,568, filed Jan. 24, 2008. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated Dec. 30, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/084,232, filed Mar. 16, 2005. |
| Non-Final Office Action dated May 30, 2008 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/084,232, filed Mar. 16, 2005. |
| Notice of Allowance dated May 14, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/637,671, filed Dec. 14, 2009. |
| Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 25, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/084,232, filed Mar. 16, 2005. |
| Requirement for Restriction/Election dated Jan. 22, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/104,932, filed May 10, 2011. |
| Requirement for Restriction/Election dated Jan. 22, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/104,936, filed May 10, 2011. |
| Requirement for Restriction/Election dated Oct. 24, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/750,470, filed Mar. 30, 2010. |
| Security for the Future, Introducing 5804BD—Advanced two-way wireless remote technology, Advertisement, ADEMCO Group, Syosset, NY, circa 1997. |
| South African Patent App. No. 2013/02668. |
| Supplemental European Search Report for Application No. EP05725743.8 dated Sep. 14, 2010, 2 pages. |
| Supplementary European Search Report for Application No. EP10819658, dated Mar. 10, 2015, 2 pages. |
| Supplementary European Search Report for Application No. EP11827671, dated Mar. 10, 2015, 2 pages. |
| Supplementary European Search Report for Application No. EP2191351, dated Jun. 23, 2014, 2 pages. |
| Supplementary Non-Final Office Action dated Oct. 28, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/630,092, filed Dec. 3, 2009. |
| Supplementary Partial European Search Report for Application No. EP09807196, dated Nov. 17, 2014, 5 pages. |
| Taiwanese Patent App. No. 99113848. |
| Taiwanese Patent App. No. 99113853. |
| Taiwanese Patent App. No. 99113855. |
| Taiwanese Patent App. No. 99113856. |
| Topalis E., et al., “A Generic Network Management Architecture Targeted to Support Home Automation Networks and Home Internet Connectivity, Consumer Electronics, IEEE Transactions,” 2000, vol. 46 (1), pp. 44-51. |
| United Kingdom Patent No. 2428821. |
| United Kingdom Patent No. 2442628. |
| United Kingdom Patent No. 2442633. |
| United Kingdom Patent No. 2442640. |
| Wireless, Battery-Powered Smoke Detectors, Brochure, SafeNight Technology, Inc. Roanoke, VA, 1995. |
| WLS906 Photoelectric Smoke Alarm, Data Sheet, DSC Security Products, Ontario, Canada, Jan. 1998. |
| X10—ActiveHome, Home Automation Made Easy [retrieved on Nov. 4, 2003], 3 pages. |
| “Modular programming”, The Authoritative Dictionary of IEEE Standard Terms. 7th ed. 2000. |
| “Application” The Authoritative Dictionary of IEEE Standard Terms. 7th ed. 2000. |
| J. David Eisenberg, SVG Essentials: Producing Scalable Vector Graphics with XML. O'Reilly & Associates, Inc., Sebastopol, CA 2002. |
| Condry M et al., Open Service Gateway architecture overview, Industrial Electronics Society, 1999, IECON '99 Proceedings, The 25th Annual Conference of the IEEE, San Jose, CA, USA, Nov. 29-Dec. 3, 1999, Piscataway, NJ, USA, IEEE, US, vol. 2, Nov. 29, 1999 (Nov. 29, 1999), pp. 735-742, XP010366642. |
| Diaz, Redondo R P et al., Enhancing Residential Gateways: OSGI Service Composition, IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, IEEE Service Center, New York, NY, US, vol. 53, No. 1, Feb. 1, 2007 (Feb. 1, 2007), pp. 87-95, XP011381790. |
| EP Search report with examination report issued in EP08797646.0, dated May 17, 2017, 16 pages. |
| CorAccess Systems, Companion 6 User Guide, Jun. 17, 2002. |
| Gong, Li, A Software architecture for open service gateways, Internet Computing, IEEE 5.1, Jan.-Feb. 2001, 64-70. |
| Valtchev, Service gateway architecture for a smart home, Communications Magazine, IEEE 40.4, Apr. 2002, 126-132. |
| Network Working Group, Request for Comments, H. Schulzrinne, Apr. 1998. |
| 6270 Touch Screen Keypad Notes, Honeywell, Sep. 2006. |
| Yanni Zhai et al., Design of Smart Home Remote Monitoring System Based on Embedded System, 2011 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Computing, Control and Industrial Engineering, vol. 2, pp. 41-44. |
| Wilkinson, S: “Logitech Harmony One Universal Remote” Ultimate AV magazine May 2008 (May 2008), XP002597782 Retrieved from the Internet : Original URL: http://www.ultimateavmag.com/remotecontrols/508logi) [retrieved on Aug. 23, 2010] the whole document; Updated URL: https://www.soundandvision.com/content/logitech-harmony-one-universal-remote, Retrieved from intemet on Jan. 11, 2018. |
| Visitalk, Communication with Vision, http://www.visitalk.jimbo.com; website accessed Jan. 10, 2018. |
| U.S. Patent Application dated Nov. 30, 2017, entitled “Controller and Interface for Home Security, Monitoring and Automation Having Customizable Audio Alerts for SMA Events”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/828,030. |
| U.S. Patent Application dated Nov. 28, 2017, entitled “Forming a Security Network Including Integrated Security System Components”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/824,503. |
| U.S. Patent Application dated Oct. 27, 2017, entitled “Security System With Networked Touchscreen”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/796,421. |
| U.S. Patent Application dated Oct. 13, 2017, entitled “Notification of Event Subsequent to Communication Failure With Security System”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/783,858. |
| U.S. Patent Application dated Aug. 9, 2016, entitled “Controller and Interface for Home Security, Monitoring and Automation Having Customizable Audio Alerts for SMA Events”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/232,135. |
| U.S. Patent Application dated Aug. 8, 2016, entitled “Security, Monitoring and Automation Controller Access and Use of Legacy Security Control Panel Information”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/231,273. |
| U.S. Patent Application dated Jul. 28, 2016, entitled “Method and System for Automatically Providing Alternate Network Access for Telecommunications”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/222,416. |
| U.S. Patent Application dated Mar. 10, 2014, entitled “Communication Protocols Over Internet Protocol (IP) Networks”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/202,579. |
| U.S. Patent Application dated Mar. 10, 2014, entitled “Communication Protocols Over Internet Protocol (IP) Networks”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/202,505. |
| U.S. Patent Application dated Mar. 10, 2014, entitled “Communication Protocols in Integrated Systems”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/203,219 |
| U.S. Patent Application dated Mar. 10, 2014, entitled “Communication Protocols in Integrated Systems”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/203,141. |
| U.S. Patent Application dated Mar. 10, 2014, entitled “Communication Protocols in Integrated Systems”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/203,128. |
| U.S. Patent Application dated Mar. 10, 2014, entitled “Communication Protocols in Integrated Systems”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/203,084. |
| U.S. Patent Application dated Mar. 10, 2014, entitled “Communication Protocols in Integrated Systems”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/203,077. |
| U.S. Patent Application dated Mar. 10, 2014, entitled “Communication Protocols in Integrated Systems”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/202,685. |
| U.S. Patent Application dated Mar. 10, 2014, entitled “Communication Protocols in Integrated Systems”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/202,627. |
| U.S. Patent Application dated Mar. 10, 2014, entitled “Communication Protocols in Integrated Systems”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/202,592. |
| U.S. Patent Application dated Mar. 10, 2014, entitled “Communication Protocols in Integrated Systems”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/202,573. |
| U.S. Patent Application dated Mar. 7, 2014, entitled “Security System Integrated With Social Media Platform”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/201,133. |
| U.S. Patent Application dated Mar. 7, 2014, entitled “Integrated Security and Control System With Geofencing”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/201,189. |
| U.S. Patent Application dated Mar. 7, 2014, entitled “Device Integration Framework”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/201,227. |
| U.S. Patent Application dated Mar. 7, 2014, entitled “Communication Protocols in Integrated Systems”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/200,921. |
| U.S. Patent Application dated Mar. 2, 2017, entitled “Generating Risk Profile Using Data of Home Monitoring and Security System”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/447,982. |
| PCT Application filed on Nov. 17, 2016, entitled “Mobile Premises Automation Platform”, PCT/US2016/062519. |
| PCT Application filed on Oct. 13, 2016, entitled “Coordinated Control of Connected Devices in a Premise”, PCT/US2016/056842. |
| PCT Application filed on Aug. 17, 2016, entitled “Automation System User Interface”, PCT/US2016/047262. |
| PCT Application filed on Aug. 16, 2016, entitled “Automation System User Interface”, PCT/US2016/047172. |
| PCT Application filed on Jul. 7, 2016, entitled “Automation System User Interface with Three-Dimensional Display”, PCT/US2016/041353. |
| PCT Application filed on Jun. 30, 2016, entitled “Integrated Cloud System with Lightweight Gateway for Premises Automation”, PCT/US2016/040451. |
| PCT Application filed on Jun. 29, 2016, entitled “Integrated Cloud System for Premises Automation”, PCT/US2016/040046. |
| PCT Application filed on Jun. 9, 2016, entitled “Virtual Device Systems and Methods”, PCT/US2016/036674. |
| GTI Genex Technologies, Inc. OmniEye.(Trademark). Product Brochure, Sep. 14, 1999 (5 pages). |
| GrayElectronics, http://www.grayelectronics.com; webpage accessed on Jan. 10, 2018. |
| GrayElectronics, “Digitizing TV cameras on TCP/IP Computer Networks,” http://www.grayelectronics.com/default.htm, printed on Oct. 12, 1999 (2 pages). |
| Genex Technologies, Genex OmniEye, www.av-iq.com/avcat/images/documents/pdfs/omnieye%20nightwatch_brochure.pdf; webpage accessed Jan. 10, 2018. |
| Foreign communication from a related counterpart application—International Search Report, App No. PCT/US02/14450, Dec. 17, 2002, 6 pgs. |
| Foreign communication from a related counterpart application—International Preliminary Examination Report, App No. PCT/US02/14450, Mar. 2, 2004, 4 pgs. |
| EP application filed on Aug. 16, 2017, entitled, “Automation System User Interface”, 17186497.8. |
| EP application filed on Jun. 9, 2016, entitled, “Data Model for Home Automation”, 16808247.7. |
| Elwahab et al.; Device, System and . . . Customer Premises Gateways; Sep. 27, 2001; WO 01/71489. |
| CA application filed on Aug. 16, 2017, entitled “Automation System User Interface”, 2976802. |
| CA application filed on Aug. 15, 2017, entitled “Automation System User Interface”, 2976682. |
| AU application filed on Mar. 8, 2017, entitled “Integrated Security Network with Security Alarm Signaling System”, 2017201585. |
| AU application filed on Feb. 28, 2017, entitled “Control System User Interface”, 2017201365. |
| U.S. Patent Application dated May 23, 2018, entitled “Networked Touchscreen With Integrated Interfaces”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/987,638. |
| U.S. Patent Application dated May 2, 2018, entitled “Automation System With Mobile Interface”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/969,514. |
| U.S. Patent Application dated Jul. 7, 2018, entitled “Integrated Security System with Parallel Processing Architecture”, U.S. Appl. No. 16/034,132. |
| U.S. Patent Application dated Jul. 3, 2018, entitled “WIFI-To-Serial Encapsulation In Systems”, U.S. Appl. No. 16/026,703. |
| U.S. Patent Application dated Jun. 27, 2018, entitled “Activation Of Gateway Device”, U.S. Appl. No. 16/020,499. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61791397 | Mar 2013 | US | |
| 61782345 | Mar 2013 | US | |
| 61802077 | Mar 2013 | US | |
| 61777061 | Mar 2013 | US | |
| 61778853 | Mar 2013 | US | |
| 61779028 | Mar 2013 | US | |
| 61779753 | Mar 2013 | US | |
| 61780092 | Mar 2013 | US | |
| 61780290 | Mar 2013 | US | |
| 61780435 | Mar 2013 | US | |
| 61780538 | Mar 2013 | US | |
| 61780637 | Mar 2013 | US | |
| 61781401 | Mar 2013 | US | |
| 61781713 | Mar 2013 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 12197946 | Aug 2008 | US |
| Child | 14201162 | US | |
| Parent | 13718851 | Dec 2012 | US |
| Child | 12197946 | US | |
| Parent | 13932837 | Jul 2013 | US |
| Child | 13718851 | US | |
| Parent | 11761745 | Jun 2007 | US |
| Child | 13932837 | US | |
| Parent | 12019568 | Jan 2008 | US |
| Child | 11761745 | US | |
| Parent | 13925181 | Jun 2013 | US |
| Child | 12019568 | US | |
| Parent | 13531757 | Jun 2012 | US |
| Child | 13925181 | US | |
| Parent | 13335279 | Dec 2011 | US |
| Child | 13531757 | US | |
| Parent | 12539537 | Aug 2009 | US |
| Child | 13335279 | US | |
| Parent | 12750470 | Mar 2010 | US |
| Child | 12539537 | US | |
| Parent | 13104932 | May 2011 | US |
| Child | 12750470 | US |
