This is a National Phase Application in the United States of International Patent Application No. PCT/EP2010/003565 filed Jun. 15, 2010, which claims priority on German Patent Application No. DE 10 2009 030 870.9, filed Jun. 26, 2009. The entire disclosures of the above patent applications are hereby incorporated by reference.
The invention relates to a so-called “active body,” consisting of individual flares that are arranged alongside one another or one behind the other, and, in particular, to the optimization of flare disk separation by means of a hydrophobic separating layer.
One such active body is described briefly in DE 199 51 767 C2, for example, and, in that case, carries out the task of a dual-mode decoy body. The active mass, which emits radiation in the infrared (IR) band, is, in that case, formed from flares. A camouflage and decoy munition of this type for protection of objects against guided missiles, which contains active substances that form smoke and/or decoy targets, is furthermore dealt with in DE 10 2005 020 159 B4.
Red phosphorus (RP) has already been a component of military applications for decades, for example, in smoke grenades for protection of infantry, artillery and watercraft, or aircraft decoy targets with an infrared (IR) effect. The smoke or IR effect is developed by the RP by combustion after corresponding ignition by activation. The RP unit is, itself, traditionally ignited and distributed by means of an ignition or break-up charge, which ensures that the active body or the active mass is ignited and distributed optimally for its respective purpose, that is to say, that the IR decoy target blooms optimally to form a cloud or a decoy target over an area.
However, in conjunction with civil applications, ignition and break-up charges, that is to say, explosives, are undesirable and should not be used in bodies or masses such as these. However, dispensing with a break-up charge has the problem that it is not possible for the IR decoy target to bloom in an ideal manner. New concepts are accordingly required, although these will not be investigated in any more detail here.
Thinking ahead, it should be noted that RP flares with an IR effect are currently produced by application of red phosphorus in conjunction with a binding agent to a mounting film (substrate). This material is shaped in the desired manner (single flare) by stamping, and is stacked for the size of the active body. Until the process of binding has been completed, the individual flares stick to one another in an undesired manner. Since the flares not only have residual moisture but also absorb moisture (they are hygroscopic), these flares often stick to one another in an undesirable manner after processing.
The binding could admittedly be forced by a separate drying process, but this would not prevent permanent adhesion. In order to minimize the residual moisture in the RP flares, the time-controlled and temperature-controlled (complex) drying process is once again tedious, and once again nevertheless results in remaining adhesion. Since, furthermore, the material is hygroscopic, it must be permanently protected against environmental moisture. This condition is satisfied by complex vacuum packages and/or storage in air-conditioned rooms.
However, in any case, ideal blooming of the IR decoy target to form a cloud after activation (i.e., ignition) and deployment of the red phosphorus is made more difficult, and it is even impossible for the alternative ignition and deployment concept for civil aviation and maritime use. However, if optimum blooming is not ensured, this leads to a low radiation yield, a poor radiation profile, and therefore not to an optimum decoy target over an area.
The purpose of the present invention is, therefore, to provide an active body that prevents the disadvantages known from practical use and allows optimum blooming, and not just of the active bodies with a break-up charge. One aim, in this case, is to suppress the adhesion or sticking of the individual flares, which is caused by adhesion as well as residual and environmental moisture.
The object of the present invention is achieved by the features of a first embodiment, which pertains to an active body (1) consisting of flares (2), which are arranged alongside one another, one above the other or one behind the other, characterized in that at least one hydrophobic (separating) layer (3, 5) is included between the flares or flare disks (2).
In accordance with a second embodiment of the present invention, the first embodiment is modified so that the layer (3) can be fitted to the flares (2) on one side or on both sides. In accordance with a third embodiment of the present invention, the first embodiment and the second embodiment are further modified so that the layer (3) is formed by a granulate or powder. In accordance with a fourth embodiment of the present invention, the third embodiment is further modified so that the powder is micro-glass balls.
In accordance with a fifth embodiment of the present invention, the first embodiment, the second embodiment, the third embodiment, and the fourth embodiment are further modified so that the powder is applied to the flares (2) by surface treatment. In accordance with a sixth embodiment of the present invention, the first embodiment is modified so the separating layer (5) is a hydrophobically, anti-cohesively and anti-adhesively coated paper. In accordance with a seventh embodiment of the present invention, the first embodiment, the second embodiment, the third embodiment, the fourth embodiment, the fifth embodiment and the sixth embodiment are further modified so that the flare disks (2, 6, 7) are based on RP (red phosphorus) or NC (nitrocellulose).
The present invention is based on the idea of detaching the flares instantaneously (quickly without delay) and permanently, with minimal throughput times and operating costs in the production process. This is done by the introduction of a hydrophobic material. The adhesion, as well as the sticking, between the individual flares are suppressed by covering the entire surface of the individual flares with a hydrophobic layer, preferably granulate/powder—for example, micro-glass balls. In this case, the adhesion is suppressed permanently, with the hydrophobic character of the material (preferably in the form of granulate)—which is used as the separating layer—ensuring that no sticking occurs even when the environmental humidity is raised.
It is therefore proposed that at least one hydrophobic separating layer be included between the flares in an active body having flares, which are arranged alongside one another, one above the other or one behind the other. The hydrophobic separating layer is preferably provided by a powder, for example, consisting of micro-balls etc., which is applied, or the like, to at least one side of the flares. From the production-engineering point of view, the granulate or powder can be applied to the unstamped flare webs, or, for example, by mixing of granulate and the flares in a mixing drum. A person skilled in the art will be aware of alternatives.
In a further variant of the invention, a separating disk is located as a separating layer between the flares, and additionally has anti-cohesive and anti-adhesive characteristics. An active body design such as this inter alia has the advantage that there is no need for long time-controlled and temperature-controlled processes (e.g., heating-drying). Furthermore, the active bodies can be stored more easily. Furthermore, the RP active mass can be saved by the improved performance of the IR decoy target.
The idea can also be implemented in conjunction with nitrocellulose flares (NC flares) and in conjunction with an active mass mix composed of RP and NC.
The present invention will be explained in more detail with reference to two exemplary embodiments and drawings, in which:
An active body 1, which is illustrated schematically in
The other variant of an active body, as shown in
The layer structure itself, according to the present invention, can be individually configured, that is to say, alternately uniformly or non-uniformly, in a sequence or as a mix. Furthermore, the disks can also be formed from NC and from RP in this case.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2009 030 870 | Jun 2009 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2010/003565 | 6/15/2010 | WO | 00 | 3/19/2012 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2010/149288 | 12/29/2010 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2678603 | Prince, Jr. et al. | May 1954 | A |
2787217 | Mahaffie | Apr 1957 | A |
3216410 | Trombatore et al. | Nov 1965 | A |
3628416 | Kernan | Dec 1971 | A |
3760729 | Freeman | Sep 1973 | A |
4002122 | Gould | Jan 1977 | A |
4060435 | Schroeder | Nov 1977 | A |
4068591 | Betts | Jan 1978 | A |
4096804 | Bilsbury | Jun 1978 | A |
4374494 | Maury | Feb 1983 | A |
4409898 | Blix et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
4624186 | Widera et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4838167 | Prahauser et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
H778 | Carlton et al. | May 1990 | H |
5074216 | Dunne et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5635666 | Bannasch et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5929369 | Bissig et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5992327 | Wardecki et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6055909 | Sweeny | May 2000 | A |
6427599 | Posson et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6513438 | Fegg et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6659012 | Grassl et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6666351 | Hartz et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
7343861 | Baker | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7363861 | Brune et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7421950 | Dillard et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7516700 | Callaway | Apr 2009 | B1 |
7584702 | Sutherland et al. | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7866265 | Kravel et al. | Jan 2011 | B1 |
7992496 | Dillard et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8146504 | Wallner et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8276518 | Dillard et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
20020011173 | Schildknecht et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20030116050 | Brum et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040139876 | Wilson et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040244626 | Ehmig | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20060032391 | Brune et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060201372 | Nicolae | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070039505 | Dillard et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20090007768 | Wallner et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090095186 | Dillard et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090301336 | Wardercki et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100288111 | Kunz | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110146520 | Guth | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110174182 | Guth et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20120137913 | Prelic et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2146015 | Feb 1995 | CA |
649 530 | Aug 1937 | DE |
2359758 | Jul 1988 | DE |
94 14 263 | Oct 1994 | DE |
197 56 204 | Mar 1999 | DE |
199 10 074 | Sep 2000 | DE |
199 51 767 | May 2001 | DE |
103 23 531 | Feb 2005 | DE |
10 2005 020 159 | Nov 2006 | DE |
10 2006 004 912 | Jul 2007 | DE |
196 49 892 | Jul 2008 | DE |
10 2007 032 112 | Jan 2009 | DE |
10 2009 020558 | Nov 2010 | DE |
10 2009 030 868 | Jan 2011 | DE |
0 204 115 | Dec 1986 | EP |
715 614 | Dec 1931 | FR |
250 271 | Oct 1926 | GB |
11173796 | Jul 1999 | JP |
0019164 | Apr 2000 | WO |
2007087948 | Aug 2007 | WO |
2010003496 | Jan 2010 | WO |
2010019291 | Dec 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority in PCT/EP2010/003565 (English Translation Jan. 2012; WIPO). |
International Search Report and IPRP issued in PCT/EP2010/003565, completed Aug. 31, 2010 and mailed Sep. 7, 2010. |
International Search Report and IPRP issued in PCT/EP2010/003566, completed Aug. 27, 2010 and mailed Sep. 7, 2010. |
International Search Report and IPRP issued in PCT/EP2010/003567, completed Sep. 16, 2010 and mailed Sep. 22, 2010. |
International Search Report issued in International Application No. PCT/EP20091004113, completed Sep. 29, 2009, mailed Oct. 6, 2009. |
International Search Report issued in International Application No. PCT/EP20091004114, completed Oct. 1, 2009, mailed Oct. 13, 2009. |
International Search Report issued in corresponding application PCT/EP2010/002332, completed Jun. 29, 2010 and mailed Jul. 6, 2010. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/291,281 on Sep. 5, 2013. |
McGraw-Hill Dictionary of Scientific and Technical Terms (Sixth Ed.) 814 (2003). |
“United States Naval Pyrotechnical Compositions,” at http://www.google.com/urlsa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=9&ved=0CGYQFjAl&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ammunitionpages.com%2Fdownload%2F237%2FUS%2520navy%2520pyrotechnicspdf&ei=zjI6UsagMLXi4AOnw4Fw&usg=AFQjCNGhmOURaXkLjZAol124l0jajOvmlg&sig2=vw04ff4-VMe—PYiiD8aZzw&bvm=bv.52434380,d.dmg (downloaded Sep. 18, 2013, five pages). |
S.M. Danali et al., Developments in Pyrotechnics, 60 Defense Science Journal 152-158 (2010). |
Clarence W. Gilliam et al., Flare, Igniter and Pyrotechnic Disposal: Red Phosphorous Smokes, Naval Ammunition Depot, AD-A013 182 (1975). |
“Pyrotechnic Chemistry,” at http://www.islandgroup.com/military/pyrotechnic—chemistry.php (2013)(downloaded Sep. 18, 2013, two pages). |
Charles A. Knapp, New Infrared Flare and High-altitude Igniter Compositions, Feltman Research and Engineering Laboratories, Picatany Arsenal (1959). |
Rui Shu, Explosive Chemistry: The History and Chemistry of Explosives, Dartmouth Undergraduate Journal of Science 21-23 (2012). |
Gao Guangyan, Nitrocellulose Synthesis Outline, at http://www.loneoceans.com/labs/nitrocellulose/ (2012). |
Random House Webster's College Dictionary 506 (1991). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120160121 A1 | Jun 2012 | US |