Patent Grant
10037735
This invention relates to active matrix displays, and more particularly to such displays having dual driving modes. This invention is especially, but not exclusively, intended for use with particle-based electrophoretic displays in which one or more types of electrically charged particles are present in a fluid and are moved through the fluid under the influence of an electric field to change the appearance of the display.
The term “electro-optic”, as applied to a material or a display, is used herein in its conventional meaning in the imaging art to refer to a material having first and second display states differing in at least one optical property, the material being changed from its first to its second display state by application of an electric field to the material. Although the optical property is typically color perceptible to the human eye, it may be another optical property, such as optical transmission, reflectance, luminescence or, in the case of displays intended for machine reading, pseudo-color in the sense of a change in reflectance of electromagnetic wavelengths outside the visible range.
The term “gray state” is used herein in its conventional meaning in the imaging art to refer to a state intermediate two extreme optical states of a pixel, and does not necessarily imply a black-white transition between these two extreme states. For example, several of the E Ink patents and published applications referred to below describe electrophoretic displays in which the extreme states are white and deep blue, so that an intermediate “gray state” would actually be pale blue. Indeed, as already mentioned, the change in optical state may not be a color change at all. The terms “black” and “white” may be used hereinafter to refer to the two extreme optical states of a display, and should be understood as normally including extreme optical states which are not strictly black and white, for example the aforementioned white and dark blue states. The term “monochrome” may be used hereinafter to denote a drive scheme which only drives pixels to their two extreme optical states with no intervening gray states.
The terms “bistable” and “bistability” are used herein in their conventional meaning in the art to refer to displays comprising display elements having first and second display states differing in at least one optical property, and such that after any given element has been driven, by means of an addressing pulse of finite duration, to assume either its first or second display state, after the addressing pulse has terminated, that state will persist for at least several times, for example at least four times, the minimum duration of the addressing pulse required to change the state of the display element. It is shown in U.S. Pat. No. 7,170,670 that some particle-based electrophoretic displays capable of gray scale are stable not only in their extreme black and white states but also in their intermediate gray states, and the same is true of some other types of electro-optic displays. This type of display is properly called “multi-stable” rather than bistable, although for convenience the term “bistable” may be used herein to cover both bistable and multi-stable displays.
The term “impulse” is used herein in its conventional meaning of the integral of voltage with respect to time. However, some bistable electro-optic media act as charge transducers, and with such media an alternative definition of impulse, namely the integral of current over time (which is equal to the total charge applied) may be used. The appropriate definition of impulse should be used, depending on whether the medium acts as a voltage-time impulse transducer or a charge impulse transducer.
Some of the discussion below will focus on methods for driving one or more pixels of an electro-optic display through a transition from an initial gray level to a final gray level (which may or may not be different from the initial gray level). The term “waveform” will be used to denote the entire voltage against time curve used to effect the transition from one specific initial gray level to a specific final gray level. Typically such a waveform will comprise a plurality of waveform elements; where these elements are essentially rectangular (i.e., where a given element comprises application of a constant voltage for a period of time); the elements may be called “pulses” or “drive pulses”. The term “drive scheme” denotes a set of waveforms sufficient to effect all possible transitions between gray levels for a specific display. A display may make use of more than one drive scheme; for example, the aforementioned U. S. Pat. No. 7,012,600 teaches that a drive scheme may need to be modified depending upon parameters such as the temperature of the display or the time for which it has been in operation during its lifetime, and thus a display may be provided with a plurality of different drive schemes to be used at differing temperature etc. A set of drive schemes used in this manner may be referred to as “a set of related drive schemes.” It is also possible, as described in several of the aforementioned MEDEOD applications, to use more than one drive scheme simultaneously in different areas of the same display, and a set of drive schemes used in this manner may be referred to as “a set of simultaneous drive schemes.”
Several types of electro-optic displays are known. One type of electro-optic display is a rotating bichromal member type as described, for example, in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,808,783; 5,777,782; 5,760,761; 6,054,071 6,055,091; 6,097,531; 6,128,124; 6,137,467; and 6,147,791 (although this type of display is often referred to as a “rotating bichromal ball” display, the term “rotating bichromal member” is preferred as more accurate since in some of the patents mentioned above the rotating members are not spherical). Such a display uses a large number of small bodies (typically spherical or cylindrical) which have two or more sections with differing optical characteristics, and an internal dipole. These bodies are suspended within liquid-filled vacuoles within a matrix, the vacuoles being filled with liquid so that the bodies are free to rotate. The appearance of the display is changed by applying an electric field thereto, thus rotating the bodies to various positions and varying which of the sections of the bodies is seen through a viewing surface. This type of electro-optic medium is typically bistable.
Another type of electro-optic display uses an electrochromic medium, for example an electrochromic medium in the form of a nanochromic film comprising an electrode formed at least in part from a semi-conducting metal oxide and a plurality of dye molecules capable of reversible color change attached to the electrode; see, for example O'Regan, B., et al., Nature 1991, 353, 737; and Wood, D., Information Display, 18(3), 24 (March 2002). See also Bach, U., et al., Adv. Mater., 2002, 14(11), 845. Nanochromic films of this type are also described, for example, in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,301,038; 6,870,657; and 6,950,220. This type of medium is also typically bistable.
Another type of electro-optic display is an electro-wetting display developed by Philips and described in Hayes, R. A., et al., “Video-Speed Electronic Paper Based on Electrowetting”, Nature, 425, 383-385 (2003). It is shown in U.S. Pat. No. 7,420,549 that such electro-wetting displays can be made bistable.
One type of electro-optic display, which has been the subject of intense research and development for a number of years, is the particle-based electrophoretic display, in which a plurality of charged particles move through a fluid under the influence of an electric field. Electrophoretic displays can have attributes of good brightness and contrast, wide viewing angles, state bistability, and low power consumption when compared with liquid crystal displays. Nevertheless, problems with the long-term image quality of these displays have prevented their widespread usage. For example, particles that make up electrophoretic displays tend to settle, resulting in inadequate service-life for these displays.
As noted above, electrophoretic media require the presence of a fluid. In most prior art electrophoretic media, this fluid is a liquid, but electrophoretic media can be produced using gaseous fluids; see, for example, Kitamura, T., et al., “Electrical toner movement for electronic paper-like display”, IDW Japan, 2001, Paper HCS1-1, and Yamaguchi, Y., et al., “Toner display using insulative particles charged triboelectrically”, IDW Japan, 2001, Paper AMD4-4). See also U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,321,459 and 7,236,291. Such gas-based electrophoretic media appear to be susceptible to the same types of problems due to particle settling as liquid-based electrophoretic media, when the media are used in an orientation which permits such settling, for example in a sign where the medium is disposed in a vertical plane. Indeed, particle settling appears to be a more serious problem in gas-based electrophoretic media than in liquid-based ones, since the lower viscosity of gaseous suspending fluids as compared with liquid ones allows more rapid settling of the electrophoretic particles.
Numerous patents and applications assigned to or in the names of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and E Ink Corporation describe various technologies used in encapsulated electrophoretic and other electro-optic media. Such encapsulated media comprise numerous small capsules, each of which itself comprises an internal phase containing electrophoretically-mobile particles in a fluid medium, and a capsule wall surrounding the internal phase. Typically, the capsules are themselves held within a polymeric binder to form a coherent layer positioned between two electrodes. The technologies described in these patents and applications include:
Many of the aforementioned patents and applications recognize that the walls surrounding the discrete microcapsules in an encapsulated electrophoretic medium could be replaced by a continuous phase, thus producing a so-called polymer-dispersed electrophoretic display, in which the electrophoretic medium comprises a plurality of discrete droplets of an electrophoretic fluid and a continuous phase of a polymeric material, and that the discrete droplets of electrophoretic fluid within such a polymer-dispersed electrophoretic display may be regarded as capsules or microcapsules even though no discrete capsule membrane is associated with each individual droplet; see for example, the aforementioned U.S. Pat. No. 6,866,760. Accordingly, for purposes of the present application, such polymer-dispersed electrophoretic media are regarded as sub-species of encapsulated electrophoretic media.
A related type of electrophoretic display is a so-called “microcell electrophoretic display”. In a microcell electrophoretic display, the charged particles and the fluid are not encapsulated within microcapsules but instead are retained within a plurality of cavities formed within a carrier medium, typically a polymeric film. See, for example, U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,672,921 and 6,788,449, both assigned to Sipix Imaging, Inc.
Although electrophoretic media are often opaque (since, for example, in many electrophoretic media, the particles substantially block transmission of visible light through the display) and operate in a reflective mode, many electrophoretic displays can be made to operate in a so-called “shutter mode” in which one display state is substantially opaque and one is light-transmissive. See, for example, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,872,552; 6,130,774; 6,144,361; 6,172,798; 6,271,823; 6,225,971; and 6,184,856. Dielectrophoretic displays, which are similar to electrophoretic displays but rely upon variations in electric field strength, can operate in a similar mode; see U.S. Pat. No. 4,418,346. Other types of electro-optic displays may also be capable of operating in shutter mode. Electro-optic media operating in shutter mode may be useful in multi-layer structures for full color displays; in such structures, at least one layer adjacent the viewing surface of the display operates in shutter mode to expose or conceal a second layer more distant from the viewing surface.
An encapsulated electrophoretic display typically does not suffer from the clustering and settling failure mode of traditional electrophoretic devices and provides further advantages, such as the ability to print or coat the display on a wide variety of flexible and rigid substrates. (Use of the word “printing” is intended to include all forms of printing and coating, including, but without limitation: pre-metered coatings such as patch die coating, slot or extrusion coating, slide or cascade coating, curtain coating; roll coating such as knife over roll coating, forward and reverse roll coating; gravure coating; dip coating; spray coating; meniscus coating; spin coating; brush coating; air knife coating; silk screen printing processes; electrostatic printing processes; thermal printing processes; ink jet printing processes; electrophoretic deposition (See U.S. Pat. No. 7,339,715); and other similar techniques.) Thus, the resulting display can be flexible. Further, because the display medium can be printed (using a variety of methods), the display itself can be made inexpensively.
Other types of electro-optic media may also be used in the displays of the present invention.
Whether or not the electro-optic medium used is bistable, to obtain a high-resolution display, individual pixels of a display must be addressable without interference from adjacent pixels. One way to achieve this objective is to provide an array of non-linear elements, such as transistors or diodes, with at least one non-linear element associated with each pixel, to produce an “active matrix” display. An addressing or pixel electrode, which addresses one pixel, is connected to an appropriate voltage source through the associated non-linear element. Typically, when the non-linear element is a transistor, the pixel electrode is connected to the drain of the transistor, and this arrangement will be assumed in the following description, although it is essentially arbitrary and the pixel electrode could be connected to the source of the transistor. Conventionally, in high resolution arrays, the pixels are arranged in a two-dimensional array of rows and columns, such that any specific pixel is uniquely defined by the intersection of one specified row and one specified column. The sources of all the transistors in each column are connected to a single column electrode, while the gates of all the transistors in each row are connected to a single row electrode; again the assignment of sources to rows and gates to columns is conventional but essentially arbitrary, and could be reversed if desired. The row electrodes are connected to a row driver, which essentially ensures that at any given moment only one row is selected, i.e., that there is applied to the selected row electrode a voltage such as to ensure that all the transistors in the selected row are conductive, while there is applied to all other rows a voltage such as to ensure that all the transistors in these non-selected rows remain non-conductive. The column electrodes are connected to column drivers, which place upon the various column electrodes voltages selected to drive the pixels in the selected row to their desired optical states. (The aforementioned voltages are relative to a common front electrode which is conventionally provided on the opposed side of the electro-optic medium from the non-linear array and extends across the whole display.) After a pre-selected interval known as the “line address time” the selected row is deselected, the next row is selected, and the voltages on the column drivers are changed so that the next line of the display is written. This process is repeated so that the entire display is written in a row-by-row manner.
The minimum time for a global refresh of the entire display (hereinafter referred to as the “frame time”) is therefore the product of the number of rows and the line address time for each row as defined above. This frame time is limited by (among other variables) the efficiency of the transistors that comprise the active matrix, and this efficiency depends upon the semiconductor material from which the transistors are made.
For certain purposes, it is desirable to be able to drive an active matrix display in at least two different modes. The discussion below will focus on the application of such dual mode driving to electrophoretic displays, as discussed above, but this invention is not limited to such displays and the invention may be used with any of the aforementioned types of display and with liquid crystal and micromechanical (MEMS) displays.
It is known in the prior art to drive electrophoretic displays in a dual mode manner, in which the first mode uses pixel-specific waveforms (i.e., waveforms which vary between individual pixels) to induce electrophoretic motion of pigment particles parallel to the applied field in the manner commonly used to render images. For example, an electrophoretic display may comprise positively charged white (scattering) particles and negatively charged black particles dispersed in a fluid; applying a negative voltage to a backplane pixel electrode will move the white pigment towards the front (viewing) surface of the display and the black pigment towards the back plane to produce a white state of the pixel (as seen through the viewing surface); conversely, applying a positive voltage to a backplane pixel electrode will produce a dark state by inducing motion of the white and black particles in the opposite directions.
In the second mode, rapidly-varying (alternating) voltages are used; see for example, U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,106,296, 7,116,466, 7,259,744, 7,304,787, 7,327,511, 7,583,251, and 7,999,787. In these patents, alternating voltages are used to induce spatially inhomogeneous distributions of particles in the plane of the display, leading to optical states that differ in transparency from states attainable by means of direct current (DC) driving. The frequency of alternating voltages (typically square waves) used to induce such changes of transparency may be in excess of 50 Hz, requiring individual square wave pulses shorter than 10 milliseconds, and frame times of similar duration. Such frame times may be beyond the capability of conventional thin film transistor arrays. In some cases alternating voltage frequencies higher than 1 kHz are required, which are far beyond the present day capabilities of commercial thin film transistor arrays.
Accordingly, the desired, rapidly-changing voltage profile required for the second driving mode may not be available through conventional driving of the backplane, i.e., the desired drive mode may involve frequencies of voltage variation or voltage values that are not accessible through the backplane by means of its row and column drivers. While conventional active matrix display modules are designed for driving in the first mode described above, they may not, therefore, allow for effective driving using the second mode.
The present invention seeks to provide a solution to this problem and thus to provide an electro-optic display, and a method for driving such a display, which permits a rapidly-changing voltage profile to be applied to the pixels of an active matrix display.
Accordingly, this invention provides an electro-optic display comprising:
In one form of this electro-optic display, in the second position of the switching means, each capacitor electrode is connected to a source of constant voltage, such as ground.
In one form of the electro-optic display of the present invention, each pixel electrode is connected to the drain of a transistor that is also connected to a source line and a gate line.
In the electro-optic display of the present invention, the portion of the pixel electrode which lies adjacent the electro-optic medium (and thus applies an electric field to this medium when the display is operating) need not be the same portion that forms a capacitor with the capacitor electrode, although the two portions of the pixel electrode (if different) must be electrically connected to one another. In particular, the electro-optic display of the present invention may make use of so-called “buried transistors” (see for example U.S. Pat. No. 7,176,880) in which each pixel electrode is in two portions lying on opposed sides of a layer of dielectric material, a first portion lying adjacent the layer of electro-optic material, and a second portion being connected to the drain or source of an associated transistor, and connected to the first portion by means of a conductive via passing through the layer of dielectric material.
The present invention also provides a method for addressing an electro-optic display comprising:
In a preferred form of this method of the present invention, each pixel electrode is connected to the drain of a transistor that is also connected to a source line and a gate line, and in step (i) of the method the voltage is applied to the pixel electrode through the transistor via the source line.
The display and method of the present invention may make use of any of the types of bistable electro-optic material discussed above. Thus, for example, in the display and method of the present invention the electro-optic material may comprise a rotating bichromal member, electrochromic or electro-wetting material. Alternatively, the electro-optic material may comprise an electrophoretic material comprising a plurality of electrically charged particles disposed in a fluid and capable of moving through the fluid under the influence of an electric field. The electrically charged particles and the fluid may be confined within a plurality of capsules or microcells, or may be present as a plurality of discrete droplets surrounded by a continuous phase comprising a polymeric material. The fluid may be liquid or gaseous.
The displays and methods of the present invention may be used in any application in which prior art electro-optic displays have been used. Thus, for example, the present displays and methods may be used in electronic book readers, portable computers, tablet computers, cellular telephones, smart cards, signs, watches, shelf labels, variable transmission windows and flash drives.
As indicated above, the present invention provides a dual drive mode electro-optic display and a corresponding driving method. The present invention allows for driving an active matrix display in two different modes. In the first mode, differing voltage pulses (or waveforms) may be provided to each individual pixel electrode of the display within a frame time (as defined above), while in the second mode a plurality of pixels comprising more than one row of the display may be addressed simultaneously with a particular voltage or waveform. Optionally, every pixel in the entire display may be addressed simultaneously in the second driving mode, but this is not a requirement of the present invention. The present invention can also provide means for switching the mode of display addressing so that it can be alternately driven in the first and second modes in distinct time segments.
Some prior art active-matrix electro-optic displays (see for example the aforementioned U.S. Pat. No. 7,176,880) make use of capacitor electrodes which form capacitors with the pixel electrodes and which are electrically connected to the (front) light-transmissive electrode through metal traces on the periphery of the backplane. This type of connection is desirable in the first driving mode of the display of the present invention because it eliminates undesirable voltage transients across the display pixels that occur whenever the voltage on the top plane and the voltage on the capacitor electrodes do not track each other faithfully.
However, such an electrical connection between the front electrode 102 and the capacitor electrodes 110 and 112 is detrimental in the second driving mode of the present display because when the capacitor electrodes are electrically tied to the front plane electrode, time variation of voltages applied to the front electrode 102 will lead to a near matching voltage variation on the pixel electrodes 106 and 108, because of capacitive coupling between the pixel electrodes 106 and 108 and the capacitor electrodes 110 and 112 for voltage variations occurring at frequencies significantly larger than a critical frequency defined below. When the pixel electrode voltages closely track the front electrode voltage, the voltage drop across the electro-optic material 104 is nearly zero, so there is unlikely to be a strong change in optical state of electro-optic layer 104 resulting from variations in the voltage applied to the front electrode 102. Essentially, the front electrode voltage changes are defeated by matching voltage changes on the capacitor electrodes.
If, however, in accordance with the second driving mode of the present electro-optic display and method, the capacitor electrodes 110 and 112 are tied to a constant voltage such as a circuit ground or a “Vcom” voltage (a voltage shifted from ground to compensate for gate-pixel voltage kickback; see U.S. Pat. No. 7,034,783), rapid variations in the voltage applied to the front electrode 102 can induce large voltage drops between the front electrode 102 and the pixel electrodes 106 and 108 (i.e., can produce large voltages across the electro-optic layer 104) and can therefore induce substantial change in optical state of electro-optic layer 104. In this case, each storage capacitor holds the voltage of its pixel electrode nearly constant when the front electrode voltage varies, because the storage capacitance is much larger than the pixel capacitance (defined, for example, by pixel electrodes 106 and 108 and the front electrode 102). For example, if the pixel capacitance is 50 fF and the pixel storage capacitor is 3 pF, neglecting other parasitic capacitances to the pixel electrode, the pixel electrode will track only about (50 fF/(50 fF+3 pF))=1.6% of the variation of the front electrode. This leaves about 98.4% of the voltage variation between the front electrode and the pixel electrode, i.e, across the electro-optic layer 104. (This calculation neglects small pixel voltage shifts due to resistive coupling between each pixel electrode and the front electrode.)
In the display 100 shown in
The operation of the switch 120 in the dual mode driving method of the present invention is as follows. The switch 120 is held in Position 1 in order to hold the capacitor electrodes at the same voltage as the front electrode and to permit driving of the display in the first (DC) mode as defined above. The switch is held in Position 2 in order to hold the capacitor electrodes at a constant voltage (such as ground or Vcom) in order to permit driving in the second (AC) mode as defined above. During second mode driving, the pixel electrode voltages will be held nearly constant because, as described above, the storage capacitance is much larger than the pixel capacitance (between the pixel electrode and the front electrode) and also much larger than other so-called parasitic capacitances between each pixel electrode and other nearby electrodes such as a source line. To be precise, because of pixel capacitance and other parasitic capacitances, the pixel electrode voltages will lift off from a constant value when the front electrode voltage is varied, but this lift off will be small when, as mentioned, the pixel storage capacitance is large compared to other capacitances with the pixel electrode capacitance.
Resistive contact between the pixel electrodes and adjacent electrodes including the front electrode and adjacent pixel electrodes will cause the pixel voltage not to stay constant. However, for rapidly-varying front electrode voltages, the voltage liftoff from a constant value will be small. Here, a front electrode voltage is considered to be “rapidly varying” when important frequencies making up the front electrode voltage are much larger than the inverse of a “pixel relaxation time.” This pixel relaxation time is given by the product of the sum of the capacitances experienced by a pixel electrode (mostly, this is the storage capacitor) and the harmonic sum of the resistances between the pixel electrode and the front electrode and neighboring pixels and the pixel transistor “off state” resistance. For ease of calculation, this harmonic sum of resistances is approximately the resistance between the pixel electrode and the front electrode (for a well-designed display), as this resistance is typically the smallest among the resistive couplings to other conductors.
The update sequence depicted in
It should be understood that the voltage on the capacitor electrodes is held constant during drive when the switch controlling these electrodes is in Position 1 as stated earlier. However, this voltage is not expected to stay constant before and after the end of the update. For example, it may be convenient or desirable to have this electrode voltage move with the “Vcom” voltage that is used to drive the front electrode when the display is not being switched through variation of the front electrode voltage. Typically, this Vcom voltage is brought to a non-zero value when beginning backplane scanning in the first display driving mode, and allowed to relax to zero at the end of backplane scanning
More than one front electrode may employed in a display, in which case more than one switch (exemplified by switch 120 in
It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that numerous changes and modifications can be made in the specific embodiments of the invention described above without departing from the scope of the invention. Accordingly, the whole of the foregoing description is to be interpreted in an illustrative and not in a limitative sense.
This application claims benefit of copending Application Ser. No. 61/727,639, filed Nov. 16, 2012. This application is also related to U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,930,026; 6,445,489; 6,504,524; 6,512,354; 6,531,997; 6,753,999; 6,825,970; 6,900,851; 6,995,550; 7,012,600; 7,023,420; 7,034,783; 7,116,466; 7,119,772; 7,193,625; 7,202,847; 7,259,744; 7,304,787; 7,312,794; 7,327,511; 7,453,445; 7,492,339; 7,528,822; 7,545,358; 7,583,251; 7,602,374; 7,612,760; 7,679,599; 7,688,297; 7,729,039; 7,733,311; 7,733,335; 7,787,169; 7,952,557; 7,956,841; 7,999,787; 8,077,141; 8,125,501; 8,139,050; 8,174,490; 8,289,250; 8,300,006; and 8,314,784; and U.S. Patent Applications Publication Nos. 2003/0102858; 2005/0122284; 2005/0179642; 2005/0253777; 2007/0091418; 2007/0103427; 2008/0024429; 2008/0024482; 2008/0136774; 2008/0150888; 2008/0291129; 2009/0174651; 2009/0179923; 2009/0195568; 2009/0322721; 2010/0045592; 2010/0220121; 2010/0220122; 2010/0265561; 2011/0187684; 2011/0193840; 2011/0193841; 2011/0199671; and 2011/0285754 The aforementioned patents and applications may hereinafter for convenience collectively be referred to as the “MEDEOD” (MEthods for Driving Electro-Optic Displays) applications. The entire contents of these patents and copending applications, and of all other U.S. patents and published and copending applications mentioned below, are herein incorporated by reference.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4132465 | Rode et al. | Jan 1979 | A |
| 4418346 | Batchelder | Nov 1983 | A |
| 5760761 | Sheridon | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5777782 | Sheridon | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5808783 | Crowley | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5872552 | Gordon, II et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5930026 | Jacobson et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 6054071 | Mikkelsen, Jr. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6055091 | Sheridon et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6097531 | Sheridon | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6128124 | Silverman | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6130774 | Albert et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6137467 | Sheridon et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6144361 | Gordon, II et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6147791 | Sheridon | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6172798 | Albert et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6184856 | Gordon, II et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6225971 | Gordon, II et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6241921 | Jacobson et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6271823 | Gordon, II et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6301038 | Fitzmaurice et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6445489 | Jacobson et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6504524 | Gates et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6512354 | Jacobson et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
| 6531997 | Gates et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6672921 | Liang et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
| 6753999 | Zehner et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6788449 | Liang et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6825970 | Goenaga et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6866760 | Paolini, Jr. et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6870657 | Fitzmaurice et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
| 6900851 | Morrison et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6922276 | Zhang et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6950220 | Abramson et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6982178 | LeCain et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 6995550 | Jacobson et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7002728 | Pullen et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7012600 | Zehner et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7023420 | Comiskey et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7034783 | Gates et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7075502 | Drzaic et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
| 7106296 | Jacobson | Sep 2006 | B1 |
| 7116318 | Amundson et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7116466 | Whitesides et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7119772 | Amundson et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7170670 | Webber | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7176880 | Amundson et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7193625 | Danner et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7202847 | Gates | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7236291 | Kaga et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7259744 | Arango et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7304787 | Whitesides et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7312784 | Baucom et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7312794 | Zehner et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7321459 | Masuda et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7327511 | Whitesides et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7339715 | Webber et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7411719 | Paolini, Jr. et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
| 7420549 | Jacobson et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7492339 | Amundson | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 7528822 | Amundson et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7535624 | Amundson et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7538757 | Zhou et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7545358 | Gates et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7583251 | Arango et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7602374 | Zehner et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 7612760 | Kawai | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7652649 | Huang | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| 7679599 | Kawai | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7679814 | Paolini et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7688297 | Zehner et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7729039 | LeCain et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7733311 | Amundson et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7733335 | Zehner et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7787169 | Abramson et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7839564 | Whitesides et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7952557 | Amundson et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7956841 | Albert et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 7999787 | Amundson et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8009348 | Zehner et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8077141 | Duthaler et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8125501 | Amundson et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8139050 | Jacobson et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8174490 | Whitesides et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8289250 | Zehner et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8300006 | Zhou et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8305341 | Arango et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8314784 | Ohkami et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8319759 | Jacobson et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8340628 | Taylor et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
| 8384658 | Albert et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
| 8558783 | Wilcox et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8558785 | Zehner et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8593396 | Amundson et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8593438 | Komatsu et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8928562 | Gates et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
| 20030102858 | Jacobson et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20050057477 | Yun et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050253777 | Zehner et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20060059748 | Wescott et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060119753 | Luo et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060284811 | Huang et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070013683 | Zhou et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070091418 | Danner et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070103427 | Zhou et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20080024429 | Zehner | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080024482 | Gates et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080136774 | Harris et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080291129 | Harris et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20090174651 | Jacobson et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090179923 | Amundson et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090195568 | Sjodin | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090322721 | Zehner et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100220121 | Zehner et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100265561 | Gates et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20110057868 | Chen | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110141082 | Yamazaki | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110149183 | Cho | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110193840 | Amundson | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110193841 | Amundson et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110199671 | Amundson et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110205195 | Komatsu et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110279491 | Liu et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110285754 | Harrington et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20120092753 | Heikenfeld et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2006251093 | Sep 2006 | JP |
| 2007316346 | Dec 2007 | JP |
| 2009-300771 | Dec 2009 | JP |
| 20070071037 | Jul 2007 | KR |
| Entry |
|---|
| Bach, U., et al., “Nanomaterials-Based Electrochromics for Paper-Quality Displays”, Adv. Mater, 14(11), 845 (2002). |
| Hayes, R.A., et al., “Video-Speed Electronic Paper Based on Electrowetting”, Nature, vol. 425, Sep. 25, pp. 383-385 (2003). |
| Kitamura, T., et al., “Electrical toner movement for electronic paper-like display”, Asia Display/IDW '01, p. 1517, Paper HCS1-1 (2001). |
| O'Regan, B. et al., “A Low Cost, High-efficiency Solar Cell Based on Dye-sensitized colloidal TiO2 Films”, Nature, vol. 353, Oct. 24, 1991, 773-740. |
| Wood, D., “An Electrochromic Renaissance?” Information Display, 18(3), 24 (Mar. 2002). |
| Yamaguchi, Y., et al., “Toner display using insulative particles charged triboelectrically”, Asia Display/IDW '01, p. 1729, Paper AMD4-4 (2001). |
| Korean Intellectual Property Office; International Search Report and Written Opinion; PCT/US2013/070226; dated Feb. 17, 2004, dated Feb. 17, 2004. |
| European Patent Office; Extended European Search Report; EP Appl. No. 13856038.8; dated Apr. 4, 2016, dated Apr. 4, 2016. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20140139501 A1 | May 2014 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61727639 | Nov 2012 | US |
