The present invention is directed to vehicle noise controls, and more particularly to a system that controls the noise created by a vehicle door closing.
Vehicle purchasers and owners are often aware of the noise the vehicle door makes when it closes. Many people equate the quality and tone of this sound with the quality of the vehicle, and at least one vehicle manufacturer has even used this sound in its advertising.
More expensive vehicles have vehicle doors made from thicker, heavier metal. As a result, the sound made by these doors when closed tend to have low frequency content with no reverberations. Doors on less expensive vehicles, by contrast, create a noise having higher frequency content and multiple reverberations when closed. The lower frequency noise can be described as a “thunk,” while the higher frequency noise can be described as “tinny.” The impressions formed by these various noises is intuitive and is often made without any conscious effort by the listener.
Because the sound of the vehicle door closing is so important in creating a favorable user impression of the vehicle, there is a desire for a system that can control and modify the noise of the vehicle door when it closes.
The present invention is directed to an active noise control system that controls and modifies the noise generated by a closing vehicle door. The system includes a switch, such as a two-stage switch, that indicates the velocity at which the vehicle door is closing. The door velocity is linked to a control noise amplitude so that the system can output a control noise through a speaker near the closing vehicle door.
The frequency spectrum of the control noise itself is selected based on the desired characteristics of the door closing noise. For example, the frequency spectrum of the control noise may be selected to cancel out higher frequency noise and/or reverberations generated when the vehicle door closes. The resulting mixed noise will then have a more pleasing lower frequency spectrum with no reverberation.
In one embodiment, the mixed noise is compared with a template reflecting the desired mixed noise. The control noise is then adjusted based on any deviations between the mixed noise and the template, allowing feedback and correction.
As is known in the art, active noise control systems generally use a speaker to output a generated noise that attenuates one or more undesired noises. The wavelengths in the generated noise are designed to be out-of-phase with the undesired noise, thereby cancelling out the undesired noise's wavelengths when the two noises are mixed together. The generated noise can be created by any known signal generator.
The inventive system uses the active noise control concept to control and modify the noises generated by a vehicle door closing. For purposes of this disclosure, the term “vehicle door” includes any vehicle closure, such as a passenger door, lift gate, hood, trunk, etc.
One embodiment of the system 100 includes a signal generator 102, a switch 104, a processor 105 and one or more speakers 106 that output the noise generated by the signal generator 102. The signal generator 102 may be part of the air induction ANC system or may be a dedicated unit for the inventive system 100. Further, the speakers 106 may themselves be part of the air induction ANC system or the ICE system or may be dedicated units for the inventive system 100. The location of the speakers 106 in the vehicle, as well as the noise output by a given speaker, depends on the specific vehicle closure that is being closed. For example, the system 100 may output a control noise through a speaker in the air induction ANC system for the hood, but may output a control noise through rear speakers in the ICE system for the trunk. The spectral content of the control noise is selected so that the mixture of the actual door closing noise and the control noise has a desired characteristic (e.g., relatively low frequency, no reverberation, etc.).
One or more optional microphones 108 may be included in the system 100 as well. The microphones 108 should be located in an area where they will pick up the mixture of the door closing noise and the control noise.
Note that the noise modification can be conducted via an open loop system or by a closed loop system.
Referring to
The processor 105 monitors the elapsed time between the closing of the first switch and the closing of the second switch in the two-stage switch 104. This elapsed time corresponds to a door velocity (block 300). If the door is moving quickly, the elapsed time between the two switch closings will be shorter than if the door is moving slowly. The processor 105 then determines an appropriate delay time based on the door velocity as indicated by the elapsed time (block 302); if, for example, the door velocity is high, then the calculated delay time would be smaller than if the door velocity was lower. This delay time coordinates the control noise with the door movement so that the control noise is output at the same time the door fully closes and generates its own noise, which mixes with the control noise.
The processor 105 then selects a speaker 106 for outputting the control noise based on which switch 104 is being closed (block 303). In one embodiment, the processor 105 selects the speaker 106 closest to the vehicle door 200 being closed and ensure that the noise generated by the vehicle door closing is effectively modified. Because each door 200 in the vehicle has its own corresponding switch 104, the processor 105 will be able to tell which door 200 is being closed without requiring any additional sensors in the system.
The processor 105 also selects an appropriate amplitude for the control noise appropriate for the door velocity (block 304). For example, if the two-stage switch 104 indicates that the door 202 is moving quickly, the processor 105 will select a high amplitude to generate a loud, door slamming noise. If the door 202 is moving more slowly, the selected amplitude will be lower. Note that the processor 105 may also check whether the door velocity falls below a selected threshold, indicating that the door is being closed very slowly and will not generate a loud noise; if this occurs, the processor 105 may decide not to output a control noise at all at block 304.
The system 100 then re-arms the sound system so that it is ready to generate another control noise the next time the door 200 is closed (block 306). Note that this re-arming may occur even if no control noise is output at block 304.
As a result, the inventive active noise control system modifies the noise of a closing vehicle door to make it more pleasant. The inventive system is not limited to vehicle passenger doors and can be incorporated into any vehicle closure, such as a trunk, hood, and/or lift gate.
It should be understood that various alternatives to the embodiments of the invention described herein may be employed in practicing the invention. It is intended that the following claims define the scope of the invention and that the method and apparatus within the scope of these claims and their equivalents be covered thereby.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Appln. No. 60/380,702, filed May 15, 2002.
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
03243437 | Oct 1991 | JP |
11149290 | Jun 1999 | JP |
2002 023766 | Jan 2002 | JP |
2002023766 | Jan 2002 | JP |
WO 01 41123 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO 200141123 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO 01 65540 | Sep 2001 | WO |
WO 200165540 | Sep 2001 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030215099 A1 | Nov 2003 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60380702 | May 2002 | US |