This patent application claims priority from EP application no. 10 154 629.9 filed Feb. 25, 2010, which is hereby incorporated by reference.
This invention relates generally to noise reduction and, more particularly, to active noise reduction in headphones.
A set of headphones may include an active noise reduction system, also known as an active noise cancelling (ANC) system. Generally, such a noise reduction system may be classified as a feedback noise reduction system or a feedforward noise reduction system.
A feedback noise reduction system typically includes a microphone, an acoustic tube and a speaker. The microphone is positioned in the acoustic tube, which may be attached to the ear of a user. The speaker is positioned between the microphone and a noise source. External noise from the noise source is collected by the microphone within the acoustic tube, and is inverted in phase and emitted from the speaker to reduce the external noise.
A feedforward noise reduction system typically includes a first microphone, a second microphone, an acoustic tube and a speaker. The first microphone is positioned in the acoustic tube between the speaker and an auditory meatus, i.e., in the proximity of the ear. The second microphone is positioned between a noise source and the speaker, and is used to collect external sound. The output of the second microphone is used to make a transmission characteristic of a path from the first microphone to the speaker the same as a transmission characteristic of a path along which the external noise reaches the meatus. The speaker is positioned between the first microphone and the noise source. External noise from the noise source is collected by the first microphone, and is inverted in phase and emitted from the speaker to reduce the external noise.
The microphones in both feedback and feedforward noise reduction systems are typically arranged in front of the speakers and close to the user's ear. Such an arrangement, however, may be uncomfortable for the user. In addition, the microphones have little mechanical protection and therefore are susceptible to serious damage during use.
According to a first aspect of the invention, an active noise reduction system includes an earphone, a first acoustic path, a second acoustic path and a control unit. The earphone includes a cupped housing, a transmitting transducer and a receiving transducer. The transmitting transducer converts a first electrical signal into a first acoustical signal, and radiates the first acoustical signal to the ear. The transmitting transducer is arranged at an aperture of the cupped housing thereby defining an earphone cavity. The receiving transducer converts a second acoustical signal into a second electrical signal. The receiving transducer is arranged within the earphone cavity. The first acoustical path extends from the transmitting transducer to the ear, and has a first transfer characteristic. The second acoustical path extends from the transmitting transducer to the receiving transducer, and has a second transfer characteristic. The control unit communicates with the receiving transducer and the transmitting transducer. The control unit compensates for ambient noise by generating a noise reducing electrical signal that is supplied to the transmitting transducer. The noise reducing electrical signal is derived from a filtered electrical signal, which is provided by filtering the second electrical signal with a third transfer characteristic. The second and the third transfer characteristics together model the first transfer characteristic.
According to a second aspect of the invention, a system for actively reducing noise at a listening point (e.g., within an ear of a user) includes a cupped earphone housing, a transmitting transducer, a receiving transducer, and a controller. The cupped earphone housing has an earphone aperture and an inner earphone cavity. The transmitting transducer is positioned at the earphone aperture. The transmitting transducer converts a first electric signal into a first acoustic signal, and radiates the first acoustic signal along a first acoustic path having a first transfer characteristic and along a second acoustic path having a second transfer characteristic. The receiving transducer is positioned within the earphone cavity. The receiving transducer converts the first acoustic signal and ambient noise into a second electrical signal. The controller compensates for the ambient noise by providing a noise reducing electrical signal to the transmitting transducer. The noise reducing electrical signal is derived from a filtered electrical signal that is provided by filtering the second electrical signal with a third transfer characteristic. The first acoustic path extends from the transmitting transducer to the listening point. The second acoustic path extends from the transmitting transducer to the receiving transducer. The second and the third transfer characteristics together model the first transfer characteristic.
Various embodiments of the active noise reduction system are described below with reference to the following figures. Unless stated otherwise, identical components are labeled in the figures with the same reference numbers. In the drawings:
A transmitting transducer 52 (e.g., a speaker) that converts electrical signals into acoustical signals to be radiated to the ear 44 is positioned at the aperture 50 of the housing 48 thereby forming an earphone cavity 54. The speaker 52 may be hermetically mounted to the housing 48 to provide an air tight cavity 54, i.e., to create a hermetically sealed volume (not shown). Alternatively, the cavity 54 may be vented as shown in
A receiving transducer 56 (e.g., an error microphone) that converts acoustical signals into electrical signals is positioned within the earphone cavity 54. The error microphone 56 therefore is positioned between the speaker 52 and the noise source 20. An acoustical path 58 extends from the speaker 52 to the ear 44 and has a transfer characteristic of HSE(z). An acoustical path 60 extends from the speaker 52 to the error microphone 56 and has a transfer characteristic of HSM(z).
The microphone 68 receives the sound radiated from the speaker 66 and noise N[n] (e.g., ambient noise) from a noise source (not shown), and generates an electrical signal e[n] therefrom. The signal e[n] is supplied on line 71 to a subtractor 72 that subtracts an output signal of a filter 74 from the signal e[n] to generate a signal N*[n]. The signal N*[n] is an electrical representation of the noise N[n]. The filter 74 has a transfer characteristic of H*SM(z), which is an estimate of the transfer characteristic HSM(z) of the secondary path 70. The signal N* [n] is output on line 75 and filtered by filter 76, which has a transfer characteristic substantially equal to the inverse of transfer characteristic H*SM(z). The output of the filter 76 is supplied via line 77 to a subtractor 78, which subtracts the output signal of the filter 76 from the source signal x[n] on line 65 to generate a signal to be supplied to the speaker 66 via line 79. The filter 74 is supplied with the same signal as the speaker 66 via the line 79. The noise reduction system 62 shown in
HSC(z)=HSE(z)−HSC(z).
The transfer characteristics HSM(z) of the secondary path 70 and the transfer characteristic HSC(z) of the filter 82 therefore together model the transfer characteristic HSE(z) of a virtual signal path 84 between the speaker 66 and a virtual microphone (e.g., the user's ear 44) at a desired signal position (listening position). When applying the aforesaid transfer characteristics, for example, to the system in
Referring to the noise reduction system 36 in
The microphone 68 receives the sound from the speaker 66 and the noise N[n], and generates the electrical signal e[n] therefrom. Signal e[n] is supplied via the line 71 to an adder 88 that adds the output signal of filter 74 to the signal e[n] to generate the signal N*[n]. The signal N*[n] on the line 75 may be an electrical representation of noise N[n]. The filter 74 has the transfer characteristic H*SM(z) that corresponds to the transfer characteristic HSM(z) of the secondary path 70. The signal N* [n] is filtered by a filter 90, which has a transfer characteristic substantially equal to the inverse of transfer characteristic HSE(z). The output of the filter 90 is supplied via line 91 to the subtractor 78. The subtractor 78 subtracts the output signal of the filter 90 from the source signal x[n] to generate a signal to be supplied via the line 79 to the speaker 66. The filter 74 is supplied with an output signal of a subtractor 92 that subtracts the signal x[n] on the line 65 from the output signal of filter 90 on the line 91.
The error signal e[n] is supplied via line 99 to an adder 100. The adder 100 subtracts an output signal on line 103 of a filter 102 from the signal e[n] on the line 99 to generate a signal d^[n]. The signal d^[n] on line 105 is an estimated representation of the noise signal d′[n] on line 97. The filter 102 has a transfer characteristic S^(z), which is an estimation of the transfer characteristic S(z) of the secondary path 104. The signal d^[n] on the line 105 is filtered by a filter 106 having a transfer characteristic W(z). The output of the filter 106 is supplied via line 107 to a subtractor 108. The subtractor 108 subtracts the output signal on the line 107 from the source signal x[n] (e.g., music or speech) on line 109, which is supplied by a signal source 110, to generate a signal to be supplied to the speaker 112 on line 111. The speaker 112 transmits the signal on line 111 to the error microphone 96 via a secondary transmission path 104, which has a transfer characteristic S(z). The filter 102 receives the output signal from the subtractor 108 on the line 111.
In some embodiments, the system shown in
Feedback ANC systems like those shown in
W(z)=P(z)/S(z),
and subtracted from the source signal x[n]. Signal e[n] may be expressed as follows:
e[n]=d[n]·P(z)+x[n]·S(z)−d^[n]·(P(z)/S^(z))·S(z)=x[n]·S(z)
if, and only if S^(z)=S(z) and as such d^[n]=d′[n]. The estimated noise signal d^[n] may be expressed as follows:
Accordingly, the estimated noise signal d^[n] models the actual noise signal d[n].
Closed-loop systems such as the ones described above may decrease an unwanted reduction of a source signal by subtracting an estimated noise signal from the source signal before the source signal is supplied to the speaker. In open-loop systems, on the other hand, an error signal is fed through a special filter in which the error signal is low-pass filtered (e.g., below 1 kHz) and gain controlled to achieve a moderate loop gain for stability, and phase adapted (e.g., inverted) in order to achieve a certain noise reducing effect. Open-loop systems therefore are less complex than close-loop systems. An open-loop system, however, may cause the desired signal to be reduced.
A typical closed loop ANC system exhibits its best performance when the error microphone is mounted as close to the ear as possible (e.g., in the ear). Locating the error microphone in the ear, however, may be inconvenient for the listener, and may deteriorate the sound perceived by the listener. Alternatively, locating the error microphone outside the ear may reduce the quality of the ANC system. Some known ANC systems therefore have modified the mechanical structure, for example, to provide a compact enclosure between the speaker and the error microphone. The compact enclosure is used such that the microphone ideally is not disturbed by the way a user wears the headphone or by different users. Although such mechanical modifications are able to solve the stability problem to a certain extent, they still may distort the acoustical performance because they are located between the speaker and the listener's ear.
The present system may overcome the aforesaid disadvantages using analog and/or digital signal processing to allow, on one hand, the error microphone to be located distant from the ear and, on the other hand, to provide substantially constant and stable performance. The present system may overcome the stability problem by placing the error microphone behind the speaker; e.g., between the ear-cup and the speaker. This position provides a defined enclosure which does not distort the acoustical performance of the speaker. In order to overcome decreased ANC performance due to the location of the error microphone, the present system utilizes a “virtual microphone” located directly in the ear of the user. The term “virtual microphone” describes how the microphone is actually arranged at one location but appears to be located at another “virtual” location using signal filtering. The following examples are based on digital signal processing so that each signal and transfer characteristic used may be in a discrete time and spectral domain (n, z). For analog processing, signals and transfer characteristics in the continuous time and spectral domain (t, s) are used such that n may be substituted by t and z may be substituted by s in the following examples.
Referring again to
The estimated noise signal N[n] that forms the input signal of the ANC system may be expressed as follows:
Relatively high (e.g., optimal) noise suppression is achieved therefore when the estimated noise signal N[n] at the virtual position is substantially the same as the actual noise in the listener's ear.
The quality of the noise suppression algorithm depends at least in part on how accurately the secondary path S(z) having, for example, the transfer characteristic HSM(z) is determined. The system therefore may adapt to changes in the secondary path S(z) in order to maintain the accuracy of the secondary path S(z) determination. Such adaptations, however, may consume additional time and increase signal processing costs. The system therefore may keep the secondary path S(z) essentially stable (i.e., maintain a substantially constant transfer characteristic HSM(z)) in order to reduce signal processing complexity.
The error microphone is arranged in a position where different modes of operation do not create significant fluctuations of the transfer function HSM(z) to maintain a stable secondary path S(z). The error microphone, for example, may be arranged within the earphone cavity (see
The performance of an ANC system employing a virtual microphone essentially depends on the difference between the noise signals at the positions of the actual error microphone and the virtual microphone (e.g., the ear). For an estimation of the performance of such ANC system in the continuous spectral domain, a so-called Maximum Square Coherence (MSC) Function Cij(ω) is used, which may be expressed as follows:
where PXiXi(ω) and PXjXj(ω) are the Auto Power Density Spectra, and PXiXj(ω) is the Cross Power Density Spectrum of signals Xi and Xj. Gij(ω) is the Complex Coherent Function of two microphones i and j. The Complex Coherent Function Gij(ω) basically depends on the local noise field. A diffuse noise field is assumed for the worst case considerations made below. Such field can be expressed as follows:
where f is the frequency in Hertz (Hz), dij is the distance between microphones i and j in meters (m), c is sound velocity in air at room temperature (c=340 [m/s]), and M is the number of microphones (e.g., 2). The SI function may be expressed as follows:
The distance dij may be expressed as follows:
The MSC function is, similar to the correlation coefficient in the time domain, the degree of the linear interdependency of the two processes. The MSC function Cij(ω) is at its maximum 1 where, for example, the signals xi(t) and xj(t) at the respective frequencies ω are correlated. The MSC function Cij(ω) is at its minimum 0 where, for example, the signals xi(t) and xj(t) are uncorrelated. Accordingly:
1≧Cij(ω)≧0.
The MSC function describes the error that occurs when the signal from microphone j is linearly estimated based on the signal from microphone i. If the distance is d=2 cm in a diffuse noise field, the MSC function may behave as illustrated in
Dij(ω)=20·log10(1−Cij(ω)) in [dB].
Although various examples to realize the invention have been disclosed, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various changes and modifications can be made which will achieve some of the advantages of the invention without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. It will be obvious to those reasonably skilled in the art that other components performing the same functions may be suitably substituted. Such modifications to the inventive concept are intended to be covered by the appended claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10154629 | Feb 2010 | EP | regional |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4494074 | Bose | Jan 1985 | A |
6735316 | Wurtz | May 2004 | B1 |
8422691 | Asada et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
20030095670 | Wurtz | May 2003 | A1 |
20080107282 | Asada | May 2008 | A1 |
20080112569 | Asada | May 2008 | A1 |
20080112570 | Asada et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080159555 | Asada et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080181422 | Christoph | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20090086988 | Ou et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2765416 | Mar 2006 | CN |
102007001980 | Jul 2008 | DE |
2270441 | Mar 1994 | GB |
2002-224500 | Sep 1990 | JP |
2001-142469 | May 2001 | JP |
2008029336 | Mar 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Kuo et al., “Active Noise Control: A Tutorial Review”, Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 87, No. 6, Jun. 1999. |
Chinese Office Action. |
Japanese Office Action dated Apr. 2, 2014. |
Canadian Office Action. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110206214 A1 | Aug 2011 | US |