The present invention relates to retractable seals for rotary machines such as steam turbines, gas turbines, aircraft engines, and compressors.
Rotary machines such as steam and gas turbines used for power generation and mechanical drive applications, aircraft engines used for propulsion, and compressors used for pressurization, are generally large machines consisting of multiple turbine and compressor stages. In such machines, pressurized fluid flowing through the turbine and/or compressor stages passes through a series of stationary and rotary components. In a typical steam turbine, the stationary components may include the machine casing and packing head, and the rotary component is the rotor. Annular seals mounted on the stationary components are used to control leakage of fluid along the path between the stationary and rotary components. In fact, the efficiency of the turbine is directly dependent on the ability of these seals to prevent such leakage. These seals can be radial or axial in orientation, and can be one of several kinds such as labyrinth packing seals, leaf seals, abradable seals, compliant plate seals, etc. Radial seals are often segmented for assembly reasons and/or for displacement in the radial direction. While radial segmented labyrinth seals have proved to be quite reliable in steam turbines, their performance degrades over time as a result of transient events in which the stationary and rotary components interfere, rubbing the labyrinth teeth into a “mushroom” profile and opening the seal clearance. On the other hand, near-contact seals such as brush seals and compliant plate seals can possibly contact the rotor during transient events leading to wear and heat generation. Heat generation, in turn, can cause rotordynamic instabilities, which are detrimental to the machine's operation and performance.
One means of reducing the negative effects of rubs or contact during transient events has been to employ the variable clearance “positive-pressure” (VCPP) arrangement, in which springs are used to hold the seal segments open at a large running clearance under the no- or low-flow transient conditions, when such rubbing is most likely to occur. During steady-state conditions, when the machine is typically operating at a higher load with higher fluid pressures, the ambient pressure around the seal segment overcomes the spring force acting to close the rings to a close running clearance. Examples of known variable clearance positive-pressure (VCPP) labyrinth seals may be found in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,695,316; 6,022,027; 5,810,365; 5,603,510; 5,002,288; and 4,443,311.
However, the variable clearance positive-pressure arrangement employs segmented seals that respond solely to the machine load. Once the machine reaches a design load, the packing ring segments close and remain closed until the machine load, and therefore the fluid pressure inside the machine, drops adequately. Thermal transients may persist, however, even after the design load has been reached. Therefore, it is ideally desired that the seal segments remain open until the thermal transients subside. Furthermore, the VCPP seals are susceptible to rubbing in case of rotor vibrations during steady-state operation, when the seal segments are forced close by the ambient fluid pressure. In such circumstances, the current VCCP arrangement is not effective in avoiding rubs since it is a passive method for positioning the seal segments. It would be desirable to provide an “actively controlled” seal positioning arrangement in which the seal segments are held open not just during no- or low-flow conditions, which correspond to the start-up and shut-down transients, but can be opened at any other operating condition, when rubbing might occur, and for any desired period of time. During the operating conditions under which rubbing is unlikely, such as steady-state full or partial load machine operation in the absence of rotor vibration, it would be desirable to ‘actively’ move the segments radially inward to their close running clearance. This would enable optimal sealing between the stationary and rotary components during steady-state operation, sustained over the machine life.
So-called “Smart Seals” employ high force capacity pneumatic actuators to provide a radially outward force to “actively” open the seal segments under any machine operating condition. The need to preserve actuator life, however, requires pressure balancing that is achieved by means of pressure control systems. Also, the actuators must be externally pressurized to overcome the fluid ambient pressure, which necessitates an external high-pressure gas supply system. Examples of “Smart Seals” configurations may be found in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,786,487; 6,655,696; 6,572,115 and 6,502,823.
In one non-limiting example, it is now proposed to provide an arrangement that allows seal segments to be retracted at any time during the operation of a turbo-machine by providing a flow bypass that neutralizes the pressure drop across the seal segments of interest. By eliminating or reducing this pressure drop, the radially inward force on the seal segments due to ambient fluid pressure is effectively reduced and the seal segments are then retracted open by springs or other suitable low-force capacity actuators. In this way, unlike the VCPP arrangement, the seal segments can be opened at any partial or full machine load, including the duration of start-up thermal transients when a design load has been reached.
Accordingly, in the exemplary and non-limiting embodiment, a pair of adjacent packing rings (each comprised of plural arcuate segments) among a group of, for example, six axially spaced rings, may be selected for active seal positioning via a bypass circuit. In other words, if it is desirable to actively retract packing rings R2 and R3, a shunt or bypass path is created for flow between a location upstream of R2 (i.e., between rings R1 and R2) and a location downstream of R3 (i.e., between rings R3 and R4). The shunt or bypass offers significantly less resistance to flow as compared to the leakage path between the seal rings and the turbine rotor. This ensures that the pressure drop across the chosen packing rings R2 and R3 will be significantly reduced when the shunt path is opened, even when the turbo-machine is operating at full load. Reduction of pressure drop across these two seal rings will allow them to retract or open due to the action of springs that are configured to nominally bias the packing segments in the open condition. Nominal, in this context, refers to the unloaded no- or low-flow machine condition.
It will be appreciated that opening and closing of the shunt path may be controlled by manual or automatic valve(s). The automatic valve(s) may be operated directly or in conjunction with the overall controller for the turbo-machine.
While the described embodiment relates to radially movable seals that are generally in the form of at least two arcuate segments, the invention described herein is equally applicable to closed, annular seals that move axially between open and closed positions as typically found in aircraft engines.
Accordingly, in one aspect, the invention relates to an active retractable seal assembly for use between rotating and non-rotating turbomachinery components comprising: at least one seal ring mounted to the non-rotating component, the seal ring movable toward and away from the rotating component between respective closed and open positions as a function of pressure drop across the seal ring; and a fluid bypass circuit for directing fluid around the at least one seal ring to reduce the pressure drop thereby resulting in the at least one seal ring moving towards an open position under the action of one or more springs or actuators.
In another aspect, the invention relates to a retractable seal assembly for use between a stationary turbine stator and a turbine rotor component of a turbine, the seal assembly comprising: a plurality of seal rings fixed to the turbine stator, each ring having at least two arcuate seal segments movable toward and away from the turbine rotor between respective closed and open positions as a function of pressure drop in a fluid flowing axially along the rotor; and a fluid bypass circuit for directing fluid around one or more of the plurality of seal rings to thereby reduce the pressure drop across the one or more of the seal rings thereby resulting in the seal segments of the one or more of the seal rings moving towards the open position under the action of one or more springs or actuators.
In another exemplary embodiment, there is provided a method of actively controlling at least one seal ring in a turbo-machine where the seal rings substantially surround a rotating component, the at least one seal ring moveable toward or away from a portion of the rotating component as a function of pressure drop in process fluid flowing along the rotating component, the method comprising: (a) establishing a fluid bypass circuit around the at least one seal ring; and (b) controlling the bypass circuit to selectively admit process fluid into the bypass circuit to thereby reduce the pressure drop across the at least one seal ring and resulting in the at least one seal ring moving away from the rotating component.
With initial reference to
Typically, the seal segments have a necked-in center portion 40 with flanges 42 at the end opposite the sealing face 30. A packing head cavity 44 is shaped to include opposed hooks 46 received within the necked-in portion 40, thus mounting the seal segments for radially inward and outward movement, toward and away from the rotor 12. Springs 48 may be located between the hooks 46 and flanges 42 to nominally bias the seal ring segment to a radially retracted or open position. These springs hold the ring segments 19 in an open or retracted position during unloaded no- or low-flow conditions, such as startup or shutdown. As the turbine is brought up to operating load, the upstream high-pressure process fluid (e.g., steam or the gaseous products of combustion) enters the cavity 44 via gap 50 or other features, such as conventionally arranged feed holes, such that the pressure force overcomes the spring force, moving the seal segment 19 radially inwardly toward the rotor 12 to a close running clearance. This is a conventional VCPP arrangement well understood in the turbine art.
For explanation purposes only, the description below assumes a determination has been made to have the segmented ring seals 18 and 20 (R2 and R3) actively retractable under any operating conditions of the turbine. To this end, and with reference again to
The upstream position for a given seal ring represents all possible positions between the seal joints for this seal ring and the immediately upstream seal ring. Similarly, the downstream position for a given seal ring represents all possible positions between the seal joint for this seal ring and the immediately downstream seal ring.
It is important to note that the seal rings to be actively controlled may be chosen based on retrofitability requirements. Using the example of
Turning now to
In the illustrated embodiment, a pair of annular seal rings 68, 70 (R1, R2, respectively) are mounted within the stator 64 such that high pressure fluid may flow in the gaps 72, 74 and into the respective ring cavity 76, 78 to move the seal rings 68, 70 toward the rotor axial plate 66. As in the previously described embodiment, at least one of the seal rings (70 as illustrated in
Turning to
In the embodiment illustrated in
In the design of the bypass path, one may utilize multiple pipes emanating from different circumferential positions at the upstream of the active rings, manifolded to one bigger pipe equipped with a single valve. Beyond the valve, the bigger pipe may branch out to smaller multiple pipes that may be attached at different circumferential positions downstream of the active rings. Alternatively, multiple pipes with individual valves may be utilized, without the need for manifolding all pipes together. In still another alternative, and using
At least one control valve 58 (also,
The active retractable seal concept works best when multiple seal stages or rings are present so that one set of seal ring(s) can be actively controlled while other upstream or downstream passive seal ring(s) that are unaffected by the bypass path or circuit perform the critical role of providing a certain minimum level of sealing (e.g., in end packings), or maintaining a certain minimum pressure drop (e.g., in blade tip sealing), when the active seals have been bypassed. While the sealing performance of the active seals is preserved, the sealing performance of the associated passive seals is allowed to be compromised by possible rubbing. For this reason, in interstage and bucket tip sealing configurations, it is desirable to include at least two sealing rings so that one can be made active by means of shunting while the other remains passive. However, in general the concept is not limited to either single stage or multiple stage sealing, and can be applied to either case.
The use of active retractable seals has several benefits and advantage. For example, this idea enables the retraction of seal segments under any machine operating condition such as start-up, speed ramp-up, load ramp-up, forward-flow/reverse-flow, steady state operation, shut-down or trip.
The concept of reducing the closing force (radially inwards for a radial seal configuration), on packing segments may be used to open the seals using either a passive biasing method such as springs, or by means of actuators. If pursuing the latter option, the proposed concept significantly reduces the force capacity required of the actuators.
In addition to actively controlling the seal clearance and therefore leakage in a turbo-machine, this concept also allows an active cycling of the seal segments. For example the packing rings in a steam turbine may be cycled from open to closed and vice versa, essentially creating a “cleaning” mode for the retractable seals in units that have poor steam quality. As an example, in industrial steam turbines there are concerns that the retractable packing may not function with time due to deposits etc. from the steam. This cleaning mode adds reliability to the operation of active retractable seals.
As already noted, the bypass circuit to actively retract seal segments disclosed herein is applicable to all turbomachinery including but not limited to steam and gas turbines, compressors, and aircraft engines.
While the invention has been described in connection with what is presently considered to be the most practical and preferred embodiment, it is to be understood that the invention is not to be limited to the disclosed embodiment, but on the contrary, is intended to cover various modifications and equivalent arrangements included within the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4304093 | Schulze | Dec 1981 | A |
4443311 | Lichtin et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
5002288 | Morrison et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5395124 | Brandon | Mar 1995 | A |
5509780 | Synfelt | Apr 1996 | A |
5603510 | Sanders | Feb 1997 | A |
5709388 | Skinner et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5749584 | Skinner et al. | May 1998 | A |
5810365 | Brandon et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
6022027 | Chevrette et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6065754 | Cromer et al. | May 2000 | A |
6131910 | Bagepalli et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6131911 | Cromer et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6139018 | Cromer et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6250641 | Dinc et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6257586 | Skinner et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6394459 | Florin | May 2002 | B1 |
6435513 | Skinner et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6505834 | Dinc et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6651986 | Chevrette et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6695316 | Popa et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6715766 | Kirby, III et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6786487 | Dinc et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6935634 | Zuo et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6957945 | Tong et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7293953 | Leach et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7384235 | Adis | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7431557 | Herron et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7484927 | Chevrette et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7559554 | Hogg et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
20050206087 | Hogg et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2002-536613 | Oct 2002 | JP |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 12/408,236, filed Mar. 20, 2009. |
Notice of Allowance issued in JP 2008-001829, dated Apr. 30, 2013. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080169616 A1 | Jul 2008 | US |