The invention will be described in further detail together with references to appended drawings where
An embodiment of the invention will be described in further detail with references to
The sensor system 24, included in the active safety system 10, is arranged to, within the detecting range 22, sense objects and generate input data relating to objects external to said host vehicle, wherein said input data at least include an object position (R, ψrel). Here R indicates the distance to the object and ψrel indicates the angle relative to the vehicle. Suitable sensor systems are well known in the art. An example of a suitable system is sold under the trade name Mobile Eye.
The active safety system 10 furthermore includes a threat indicator 26 which is arranged to assign a threat level to each external object detected by the sensor system 24. Threat indicators are well known in the art. An example of a threat indicator is described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,034,668. A thorough description of how to enable a threat level indicator is described in “Collision avoidance theory”, Jansson J., Linköping Studies in Science and technology, Dissertation no 950, Linköping 2005. In particular chapters 5.3.6-5.3.8 relates to equations describing required longitudinal acceleration and required lateral acceleration for collision avoidance, which entities suitably may be used as threat level, particularly if these entities have been normalized by dividing with maximum available longitudinal acceleration and lateral acceleration respectively.
An eye gaze recorder 28, included in the active safety system 10, is arranged for recording the direction of gaze of a user φ determined by an eye gaze monitor 30. Eye gaze monitors are well known in the art. A camera registers characteristic features of the users head, suitably the eyes. The eye gaze monitor determines, via image recognition the direction of the gaze φ relative to the vehicle. In the eye gaze recorder 28 the direction of gaze determined by the eye gaze monitor 30 are stored in a memory.
An awareness detector 32 is arranged to determine awareness of an object based on an assessed observation. An observation is being assessed by use of a recorded direction of gaze φ of the user and the position of the detected objects (R, ψrel)object-k. An observation of an object k is assessed when the direction of the gaze φ corresponds to the direction to an object k ψrelobject-k at a given time tk0 With corresponds is here intended that the difference between the direction of gaze φ and the direction to an object k ψrelobject-k is smaller than a predetermined angle, suitably 2°.
A controller 34 is arranged to, for objects detected by said sensor system 24 and objects which the awareness detector 32 has determined that the user is aware of, collect threat level data Tk(t) from the threat indicator 26, to store threat level data Tk(t) collected at different points in time, to assign a threat level awareness (Tk(tk0)) by selecting the threat level (Tk(t)) at which the object (k) was observed, and to compare the current threat level (Tk(t)) of the object with the threat level awareness (Tk(tk0)).
In a method according to the invention, the following process steps may be performed:
In a set of process steps S10, within a detecting range 22 of a sensor system 24 arranged on a host vehicle 12, sensing objects 14-20 external to the host vehicle. Input data relating to objects external to said host vehicle is generated. The input data include an object position (R, ψrel). The input data may be processed in a state observer based on a Kalman filter process as is conventional in the art. A conventional observer Xk suitably includes the states xn; yn; βn; an; and vn, where xn is a coordinate along the length of the road for object number k; yn is a coordinate in the width direction of the road for object number k; βn is an angle between the travelling direction and the coordinate length extension of the road for object number k; an is the acceleration for object number k; and vn is the velocity of object k, such that the observer Xk may be expressed as Xk=[xn yn βn an vn]. for an external object k. The input data may also include host vehicle measurement data such as host vehicle velocity VH, acceleration aH, host vehicle yaw angle θH. A suitable observer for the host vehicle may be YH=[xH yH βH], where xH is a coordinate along the length of the road for the host vehicle; yH is a coordinate in the width direction of the road for the host vehicle; βH is an angle between the travelling direction and the coordinate length extension of the road for the host vehicle.
In a set of process steps S20, recording the direction of gaze φ of a user, determined by an eye gaze monitor 30.
In a set of process steps S30, determining awareness of an object based on an assessed observation, which observation is being assessed by use of a recorded direction of gaze φ(t) of the user and the position of the objects (R, ψrel). In
The observations of external object may suitably be stored in a matrix Bk(t) as exemplified in
In a set of process steps S40 a threat level Tk is assigned to each external object detected by the sensor system. The threat levels Tk(t) for each external object k is suitably stored in a matrix T as exemplified in
At least for objects detected by said sensor system and objects which the user is aware of, the following set of process steps S60 are performed: collecting threat level data from said threat indicator, storing threat level data collected at different points in time, assigning a threat level awareness by selecting the threat level at which the object was observed, and comparing the current threat level Tk(t) of the object k with the threat level awareness Tk(tk0), which corresponds to the threat level at the time tk0 when the object k was observed.
The controller preferably generates a control signal 36 in the event, for any of the objects detected by the sensor system, the current threat level Tk(t) exceeds the threat level awareness Tk(tk0) by more than a threshold value S.
The threshold value may depend on the derivative of the threat level or on the time interval between the time of observation and the current time.
The control signal 36 is preferably constituted by a warning transmitted visually to the driver.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
06120350.1 | Sep 2006 | EP | regional |