1. Field
The present invention relates to an actuated prosthesis for amputees, particularly but not exclusively for a leg prosthesis for above knee amputees.
2. Description of Related Art
Over the years, many kinds of prostheses have been devised in effort to replace the limbs that amputees have lost. In particular, many efforts have been made to develop prostheses that will replace the loss of major limbs such as legs and arms in view of the immense impact that such a loss has on the amputee. All these prostheses have the difficult task of giving to these amputees a life as normal as possible. The task is particularly difficult for leg prostheses due in part to the complexity of human locomotion. Conventional leg prostheses have until now only been using passive mechanisms in the most sophisticated available devices. Conventional leg prostheses are very limited compared to a real human leg and some needs were thus not entirely fulfilled by them.
According to amputees, specific conditions of use of conventional leg prostheses, such as repetitive movements and continuous loading, typically entail problems such as increases in metabolic energy expenditures, increases of socket pressure, limitations of locomotion speeds, discrepancies in the locomotion movements, disruptions of postural balance, disruptions of the pelvis-spinal column alignment, and increases in the use of postural clinical rehabilitation programs.
Another problem is that during the amputees' locomotion, energy used for moving the prosthesis mainly originates from the amputees themselves because conventional leg prostheses do not have self-propulsion capabilities. This has considerable short and long-term negative side effects. Recent developments in the field of energy-saving prosthetic components have partially contributed to improve energy transfer between the amputees and their prosthesis. Nevertheless, the problem of energy expenditure is still not fully resolved and remains a major concern.
A further problem is that the dynamic role played by the stump during the amputees' locomotion renders difficult the prolonged wearing of conventional leg prostheses. This may create, among other things, skin problems such as folliculitis, contact dermatitis, oedema, cysts, skin shearing, scarring and ulcers. Although these skin problems may be partially alleviated by using a silicone sheath, a complete suction socket or powder, minimizing these skin problems remain a concern.
Similar considerations apply in other prostheses, to a greater or lesser extent as dictated by the particular conditions that are imposed on the prosthesis.
It is therefore an object of the present invention to obviate or mitigate the above disadvantages.
In accordance with a first broad aspect of the present invention, there is provided an actuated prosthesis for replacement of an amputated limb, the prosthesis comprising: a primary joint member; a socket connector assembly for connecting a socket to said primary joint member; an elongated structural member having opposite ends spaced apart along, a main longitudinal axis; a connector assembly for connecting a terminal portion to an end of said structural member; a pivot assembly for operatively connecting the structural member to the primary joint member to permit relative rotation between said primary joint member and said structural member about an first axis defined by said pivot assembly; a linear actuator connected at one end to said structural member and at the opposite end to said primary joint member at a location spaced from said pivot assembly, whereby extension or retraction of said actuator induces a corresponding rotation of said primary joint member relative to said structural member about said pivotal axis.
Preferably, said prosthesis is a leg prosthesis and said actuator is electrically powered.
In accordance with another broad aspect of the present invention, there is provided an improved actuated leg prosthesis comprising a knee member, a socket connected to the knee member, an elongated trans-tibial member, an artificial foot connected under a bottom end of the trans-tibial member, and a linear actuator. A first pivot assembly allows to operatively connect the trans-tibial member to the knee member. The first pivot assembly defines a first pivot axis that is perpendicular to a main longitudinal axis of the trans-tibial member. A second pivot assembly allows to operatively connect an upper end of the actuator to the knee member. The second pivot assembly defines a second pivot axis that is substantially parallel to the first pivot axis. The second pivot axis is also spaced apart from the first pivot axis and the main longitudinal axis. A third pivot assembly allows to operatively connect a bottom end of the actuator to the bottom end of the trans-tibial member. The third pivot assembly defines a third pivot axis that is substantially parallel to and spaced apart from the first pivot axis.
Embodiments of the present invention will now be described by way of example only with reference to the accompanying drawings.
The appended figures show three alternative embodiments of an actuated prosthesis (10) implemented as a leg prosthesis for an above knee amputee. It should be understood that the present invention is not limited to these illustrated implementations since various changes and modifications may be effected herein without departing from the scope of the appended claims and the principles and concepts described may be applied to prosthesis to replicate other limbs such as an arm. For clarity and ease of description, terminology relating to the use as a leg has been utilized but it will be understood that terminology applicable to the equivalent functions in other limbs may be used. For example, reference to a “knee” could be described equally with respect to an “elbow” if the prosthesis is an arm.
As illustrated, the prosthesis (10) has three alternative configurations, one being a front actuator configuration, another being a rear actuator configuration and the other being an inverted actuator configuration. The front actuator configuration is preferred.
Front Actuator Configuration
The socket (18) must achieve adequate effort transfers between the prosthesis (10) and the amputee's stump. The design of the socket (18) is usually a custom operation in order to achieve an optional load transmission, stability and efficient control for the stump's mobility. The socket (18) is generally held in place on the stump of the user by a suction effect created by an appropriate system such as, for example, a flexible suction liner of type “Thermolyn” manufactured by the Otto Bock Inc. The prosthesis (10) can otherwise use any suitable sockets available on the market.
The socket assembly connector (17) for connecting the socket (18) may comprise a bottom socket connector (22) provided over the knee member (12). The bottom socket connector (22) is preferably removably connected by means of fasteners, for instance screws or bolts. The exact type of bottom socket connector (22) may vary. An example is a connector having a standard male pyramid configuration, such as male pyramid model 4R54 manufactured by Otto Bock Inc. Another example is the sliding connector with male pyramid model 2054-2 manufactured by Ossur Inc. The socket (18) would then be equipped with a corresponding upper connector which fits over the bottom male connector (22). Other types of connectors may be used as well.
The knee member (12) provides the junction between the socket (18) and the trans-tibial member (14) with at least one degree of freedom in rotation. The knee member (12) range of motion is preferably about 105 degrees, where zero degree is at full extension and 105 degrees is at maximal knee flexion.
The knee member (12) is connected to the trans-tibial member (14) by means of a first pivot assembly (30). The first pivot assembly (30) operatively connects the trans-tibial member (14) to the knee member (12), thereby making possible a relative rotation between these two parts. It should be noted that the first pivot assembly (30) can also be polycentric. This means that the movement between the knee member (12) and the trans-tibial member (14) is not purely rotational but follows a much more complex pattern. The right and left sides of the parts can further be slightly different, thereby causing a slight torsion movement around a vertical axis. Nevertheless, the general overall movement remains substantially a rotation around a pivot axis.
The first pivot assembly (30) defines a first pivot axis (31) that is substantially perpendicular to a main longitudinal axis (15) extending along the length of trans-tibial member (14) in the frontal plane, as shown in
Preferably, as best shown in
These bumpers (44) can be, for example, bumper model GBA-1 manufactured by Tecspak Inc. Of course, other types of bumpers (44) may be used as well. They are mounted on corresponding brackets (42) located on the side and the front of the upper plate (26) of the knee member (12). The brackets (42) are also used to support connectors (78) which are described later in the description.
As can best be seen in
The upper section (14A) of the trans-tibial member (14) is preferably a fork-shaped item with two flanges (50) projecting from a mounting base (52). The mounting base (52) is rigidly connected to a pair of trans-tibial post bars (54). A back plate (56) is provided at the back. The pair of bars (54) and the back plate (56) are part of the middle section (14B). They are both connected to the bottom section (14C), which is itself formed from two parts (60, 62). The first part (60) is a somewhat U-shaped part under which the second part (62) is attached. The second part (62) is an extension under which the artificial foot (20) is provided. The foot connector assembly (19) for connecting the artificial foot (20) includes a set of threaded holes in which screws are inserted. Other types of connectors may be used.
The artificial foot (20) may be, for example, a standard 26 cm Trustep prosthetic foot manufactured by College Park Industries Inc. or Allurion model ALX5260 prosthetic foot manufactured by Ossur Inc. Other types of articulated or non-articulated artificial foot (20) may be used if the selected prosthetic foot provides approximately at least the same dynamical response as the ones mentioned here above. The design of the prosthesis (10) is modular and consequently, it can be adjusted to any morphology. The artificial foot (20) may have an exposed metal or composite structure. It may also have a cosmetic covering that gives it the appearance of a human ankle and foot.
The pair of bars (54) and the back plate (56) provide a space (58) in which most of the actuator (16) is located. The various electronic and electric components may also be attached on either sides of the back plate (56). This compact arrangement keeps the overall dimensions within that of a normal human leg.
The linear actuator (16) is shown in
The choice of the linear actuator (16) is primarily based on weight versus torque ratio and speed of available motor technologies. It is preferred over a direct drive system coupled directly to the knee member (12) because it takes less space for the torque requirement in human locomotion. It was found that ideally, the actuator (16) must be capable of supplying a continuous force of about 515 N and a peak force of about 2250 N.
The second pivot assembly (80) operatively connects the upper end (16A) of the actuator (16) to the knee member (12). The second pivot assembly (80) defines a second pivot axis (81) that is substantially parallel to the first pivot axis (31). It is also spaced from the plane defined by its first pivot axis (31) and the main longitudinal axis (15). An example of this configuration is schematically illustrated in
The bottom end (16B) of the actuator (16) is operatively connected to the trans-tibial member (14) using a third pivot assembly (100), as shown in
The various structural parts of the prosthesis (10) are preferably made of a light material, for instance aluminum or a composite material, such as carbon fiber, fiberglass or the like. A particularly suitable material is thermally treated 6061T6 aluminum. The various parts are preferably screwed together, although they may be welded and otherwise secured together Screwing the parts together is preferred since this increases manufacturability, facilitates servicing and replacement of the parts, and usually improves the overall aesthetics.
Connectors (78), attached to the brackets (42) of the knee member (12), provide the required connections. A similar connector (78) is provided on the motor (70). A two-part wire clamp (39A, 39B) on parts (254) allows to hold the wire on the support (38).
Control System
The actuator (16) shown in the prosthesis of
The power supply (240) can be, for example, a flexible battery pack belt such as the Lighting Powerbelt model, manufactured by Cine Power International Ltd. Other examples of power supply (240) are the battery model SLPB526495 manufactured by Worley Inc. and the super capacitors manufactured by Cap-XX. Examples of power drive (230) are the 5121 model, manufactured by Copley Controls Corps Inc. and the model BE40A8 manufactured by Advanced Motion Control. It should be noted that the design of the power supply (240) and that of the power drive (230) are not limited to the devices mentioned here above and could be performed by any custom or commercial products if the selected devices meet the electrical specification of the selected actuator (16) used with the prosthesis (10).
Preferably, the prosthesis (10) further includes a set of sensors (250) to provide feedback information to the controller (220). This feedback allows the controller (220) to adjust the forces and various other parameters. Examples of parameters that can be monitored are the relative angle of the knee member (12) and the torque at the knee member (12) being exerted by the actuator (16). Other types of measurements may be taken. The measurement of the relative angle of the knee member (12) can be taken, for example, by a standard commercially available incremental optical encoder (260) such as a reading head model EM1-0-250 and a Mylar® strip (262) marked with evenly spaced increments model LIN-250-16-S2037 manufactured by US Digital Inc. Others sensors used as limit switches for the limitation of the angular motion of the prosthesis (10) are the optical switches preferably mounted onto the specialized mechanical support (38). Cable connectors (78), shown in
The optical switches (252) are fixed on the first pivot axis (31) and are used to set the reference angular position of the knee member (12). Once this reference position is known, the optical encoder information is used to compute the knee member (12) angle via motor rotation, roller-screw pitch and prosthesis geometry. Moreover, the optical switches (252) are used to prevent out of range motion by sending a signal to the controller (220) when the knee member (12) approaches critical positions. Of course, the optical switches (252) may be use for other purposes according to the nature of the command associated with the switches detection. Another possible way of measuring the relative angle of the knee member (12) is by using a combination of an absolute optical encoder such as, for example, encoder model E2-512-250-i manufactured by US Digital Inc. and optical switches. An example of these switches is the switch model PM-L24 manufactured by SUNX.
The measurement of the torque is taken from the force being exerted by the actuator (16) measured by a load cell (92). An example of the load cell is the model LC 202 1 K manufactured by Omegadyne. A connector on the motor (70) links the internal sensor to the cable. It should be noted that the sensors (250) of the prosthesis (10) are not limited to the above-mentioned devices and can be performed by other suitable instruments.
Operation of the Front Actuator Configuration
In operation, the knee assembly (12) is connected to the socket (18) and the pivot assembly (30) permits relative motion between the trans-tibial member and the knee about a generally transverse horizontal axis. Rotation of the knee member relative to the trans-tibial member (14) is controlled by operation of the actuator (16). The actuator (16) acts between the pivot assembly (80) on the knee member (12) and the pivot assembly (100) at the lower end of the trans-tibial member (14) so that changes in the length of the actuator (16) will cause a corresponding rotation about the pivot (30).
The length of the actuator (16) is adjusted by control signals from the controller (220) that supplies power to the motor (70) to rotate the screw (72) in one direction or the other. Rotation of the screw (72) causes the follower (74) to move along the screw (72) and this motion is transferred through the connection provided by the pivot assembly (100) to the trans-tibial member (14). This causes a corresponding rotation of the knee member (12) and trans-tibial member (14) about the pivot axis (30) to provide the desired motion. Obviously the rate and extent of rotation may be adjusted through control signals to the motor (70) and the sensors embodied in the prosthesis provide the feedback to the controller (220).
Rear Actuator Configuration
The trans-tibial member (14) also has a shell type architecture composed, for example, of ½″ trans-tibial post bars (54) linking together the knee member (12) and the artificial foot (20). In the illustrated embodiment, the actuator (16) could be a standard linear motor (
In the arrangement shown in
Inverted Actuator
In each of the above embodiments, the actuator (16) has been arranged with the motor (70) adjacent to the knee member (12) and the follower (74) extending to the lower, ankle region of the trans-tibial member (14). Such an arrangement simplifies the routing of the power and control lines and generally allows a tapering profile toward the ankle to conform to the natural profile of a leg. However, with these arrangements the motor (70) moves with the pivot assembly (80) through the range of motion of the prosthesis and accordingly the swept volume of the motor must be accommodated in the design of the knee member (12). Similarly, the location of the motor (70) adjacent the knee member causes variations in the mass distribution and hence the dynamics of the prosthesis during movement of the leg which may result in an unnatural feel to the prosthesis in use. To address these considerations a further embodiment of the prosthesis (10) is shown in
Referring therefore particularly to
The trans-tibial member (14′) has an upper section (14A′) formed by a pair of spaced webs (300) with bores (302) to receive the bearings (34′) of the pivot assembly (30′). The webs (300) are secured to shoulders, not shown, at the upper end of the middle section (14B′). The middle section (14B′) is formed as an open channel member (304) with laterally spaced side walls (306) interconnected by an integrally formed front wall (308). The channel member (304) is closed by a back wall (310), which is removable to permit access to the interior of the channel member (304). The middle section (14B′) thus provides a lightweight structural member of high torsional and bending strength to meet the loading placed upon it.
The upper and lower ends (312, 314) respectively of the channel member (304) are enlarged to receive the upper section (14A′) and lower section (14B′) and thereby define a waisted intermediate portion (316). The side walls (306) in the waisted portion (316) have generally planar flanks that support energy storage modules (320), typically battery packs, on either side of the channel member (304). The front wall (308) is also formed with a planar facet (314) to receive a control board (319) associated with the operation of the actuator (16′) and to regulate power flow to and from the energy storage modules (320).
The back wall (310) also serves as a mounting point for a further control board (322) utilized in the control of the actuator (16′). An external shell (324), formed from front and rear sections (326, 328) respectively, encompasses the intermediate portion (316) and is supported on the enlarged upper and lower ends (312, 314). The shell (324) protects the components mounted on the waisted intermediate portion (316) as well as being contoured to conform to the appearance of a human leg.
The lower section (14C′) of the trans-tibial member (14′) includes a mounting plate (330) received within the enlarged lower end (314). The plate (330) is bolted the lower ends (314) of the channel member (304) and to the power drive (322) utilized in the control of the actuator (16′) which in turn is secured to the middle section (14B)′. A socket (334) is mounted on the underside of the plate (330) to receive a tubular member (336) of the foot connector assembly (20′). The tubular member (336) extends to a male socket formed on the foot (20′) and its length may be adjusted to tailor the prosthesis to a particular individual. A skirt (338) extends around the tubular member (336) for cosmetic considerations.
As can best be seen in
The motor (70′) is similarly connected through a pivot assembly (100′) to the lower end (314) of the middle section (14B′) at mounting points (340) (
Operation of Inverted Actuator
The operation of the inverted actuator is essentially the same as that of the front mounted actuator with rotation of the motor (70′) causing a change in the effective length of the actuator (16′) and a corresponding rotation of the knee member (12′) relative to trans-tibial member (14′). During such rotation it will be noted that the motor (70′) swings about its pivot assembly (100′) but does not translate along the axis of the prosthesis (10′). The swept volume of the motor through the range of movement is thus reduced allowing better utilization of the space available. It will also be noted that the mass distribution in the prosthesis remains substantially uniform in view of the lack of translation of the motor to provide a more natural feel to the operation of the prosthesis.
The integration of the energy module and control boards on the middle section also provides a more self contained unit and simplifies the routing of the control and power transmission.
One can assume the following technical specifications:
a geometrical volume corresponding to the anthropometrical volume of a natural shank of an individual having a weight of 70 kg and a height of 170 cm;
a maximal distance r set at 0.055 m, that is r<0.055 m;
a minimal and a maximal length LT set at 0.3 m and 0.4 m respectively, that is 0.3 m<LT<0.4 m; and
a minimal and a maximal distance dT set at −0.015 m and +0.015 m, that is −0.015 m<dT<+0.015 m.
The geometrical model can be defined with the following equations:
where
θK Knee angle, ∠DOA
r Distance between the center of rotation “O” of the knee member (12) and the attachment point of the actuator (16) on the knee member (12)
θfix Angle between r and the stump's center axis, ∠EOC
LA Distance between the center of rotation of the knee member (12) and the attachment point of the actuator (16) on the trans-tibial member (14)
LT Length between the center of rotation of the knee member (12) and the attachment point of the trans-tibial member (14)
dT Distance between the center axis of the trans-tibial member (14) and the actuator (16) attachment point of the trans-tibial member (14),
α Angle formed between LT, LA: ∠AOB
L Length of the actuator (16),
β Angle formed between LA, r: ∠BOC
bT Lever arm of the actuator (16) versus the first pivot axis (31)
Preferably, the lever arm br is assumed to be maximum at a knee angle θk of 35 degrees. The geometrical calculation of the mechanical design are based on the setting of the distance r, the length LT, the distance dT and the angle θfix. Therefore, these parameters are defined in accordance with the anthropomorphic measurements of the amputee and the selected actuator (16).
For an angle θfix, the optimal value for a maximum lever arm br is found when Equation 5 is at a maximum value, that is:
where θfix=π−π−θK−β.
This condition is reached for the configuration shown in
From Equation 1, the optimal angle between distance r and the center axis of the socket, denoted θfix|
where +π/2 and −π/2 correspond to the rear and the front actuator configuration respectively.
The result is that the optimal angle θfix is preferably set at 125±3 degrees.
It will be appreciated that alternative dimensions and parameters would apply to other limbs such as an arm but the adaptation of the basic components described above to such an environment could readily be made once the underlying concepts are understood.
The present application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/721,764, filed Nov. 25, 2003, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,736,394 on Jun. 15, 2010, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/463,495, filed Jun. 17, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,314,490, which claims the benefit of priority of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/405,281, filed Aug. 22, 2002, U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/424,261, filed Nov. 6, 2002, and U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/453,556, filed Mar. 11, 2003, each of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
909859 | Apgar | Jan 1909 | A |
2568051 | Catranis | Sep 1951 | A |
2619652 | Vesper | Dec 1952 | A |
2843853 | Mauch | Jul 1958 | A |
2859451 | Mauch | Nov 1958 | A |
3316558 | Mortensen | May 1967 | A |
3417409 | Prahl | Dec 1968 | A |
3501776 | Beeker et al. | Mar 1970 | A |
3589134 | Hackmann | Jun 1971 | A |
3659294 | Glabiszewski | May 1972 | A |
3701368 | Stern | Oct 1972 | A |
3791375 | Pfeifer | Feb 1974 | A |
3820168 | Horvath | Jun 1974 | A |
3866246 | Seamone et al. | Feb 1975 | A |
3871032 | Karas | Mar 1975 | A |
3995324 | Burch | Dec 1976 | A |
4005496 | Wilkes | Feb 1977 | A |
4023215 | Moore | May 1977 | A |
4030141 | Graupe | Jun 1977 | A |
4064569 | Campbell | Dec 1977 | A |
4065815 | Sen-Jung | Jan 1978 | A |
4100918 | Glancy | Jul 1978 | A |
4179759 | Smith | Dec 1979 | A |
4209860 | Graupe | Jul 1980 | A |
4212087 | Mortensen | Jul 1980 | A |
4310932 | Nader et al. | Jan 1982 | A |
4314379 | Tanie et al. | Feb 1982 | A |
4354676 | Ariel | Oct 1982 | A |
4386891 | Riefel et al. | Jun 1983 | A |
4387472 | Wilson | Jun 1983 | A |
4433679 | Mauldin et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
4458367 | May | Jul 1984 | A |
4518307 | Bloch | May 1985 | A |
4521924 | Jacobsen et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4556956 | Dickenson et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4558704 | Petrofsky | Dec 1985 | A |
4569352 | Petrofsky et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4578083 | Williams | Mar 1986 | A |
4600357 | Coules | Jul 1986 | A |
4602619 | Wolf et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4617920 | Carsalade | Oct 1986 | A |
4649934 | Fraser et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4657000 | Hepburn | Apr 1987 | A |
4657470 | Clarke et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4685926 | Haupt | Aug 1987 | A |
4685927 | Haupt | Aug 1987 | A |
4711242 | Petrofsky | Dec 1987 | A |
4726404 | Haber et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4730625 | Fraser et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4760850 | Phillips et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4770662 | Giampapa | Sep 1988 | A |
4776326 | Young et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4776852 | Rubic | Oct 1988 | A |
4790522 | Drutchas | Dec 1988 | A |
4795474 | Horvath | Jan 1989 | A |
4805455 | DelGiorno et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4808187 | Patterson et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4814661 | Ratzlaff et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4838251 | Chignon et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4843921 | Kremer | Jul 1989 | A |
4854428 | Horvath | Aug 1989 | A |
4865024 | Hensley et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4872803 | Asakawa | Oct 1989 | A |
4876944 | Wilson et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4878913 | Aebischer et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4892554 | Robinson | Jan 1990 | A |
4893648 | Horvath | Jan 1990 | A |
4919418 | Miller | Apr 1990 | A |
4928676 | Pansiera | May 1990 | A |
4944755 | Hennequin et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4958705 | Horvath | Sep 1990 | A |
4989161 | Oaki | Jan 1991 | A |
4994086 | Edwards | Feb 1991 | A |
5012591 | Asakawa | May 1991 | A |
5020790 | Beard et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5033291 | Podoloff et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5044360 | Janke | Sep 1991 | A |
5062673 | Mimura | Nov 1991 | A |
5062856 | Sawamura et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5062857 | Berringer et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5086785 | Gentile et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5092902 | Adams et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5112296 | Beard et al. | May 1992 | A |
5112356 | Harris et al. | May 1992 | A |
5133773 | Sawamura et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5133774 | Sawamura et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5139525 | Kristinsson | Aug 1992 | A |
5153496 | LaForge | Oct 1992 | A |
5174168 | Takagi et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5181931 | Van de Veen | Jan 1993 | A |
5197488 | Kovacevic | Mar 1993 | A |
5201772 | Maxwell | Apr 1993 | A |
5217500 | Phillips | Jun 1993 | A |
5219365 | Sabolich | Jun 1993 | A |
5230672 | Brown et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5246465 | Rincoe et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5252102 | Singer et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5252901 | Ozawa et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5253656 | Rincoe | Oct 1993 | A |
5265890 | Balsells | Nov 1993 | A |
5277281 | Carlson et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5282460 | Boldt | Feb 1994 | A |
5284330 | Carlson et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5314498 | Gramnas | May 1994 | A |
5323650 | Fullen et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5327790 | Levin et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5336269 | Smits | Aug 1994 | A |
5357696 | Gray et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5376128 | Bozeman, Jr. | Dec 1994 | A |
5376133 | Gramnas | Dec 1994 | A |
5376137 | Shorter et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5376138 | Bouchard et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5376141 | Phillips | Dec 1994 | A |
5382373 | Carlson et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5383939 | James | Jan 1995 | A |
5394132 | Poil | Feb 1995 | A |
5405407 | Kodama et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5405409 | Knoth | Apr 1995 | A |
5405410 | Arbogast et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5405510 | Betts | Apr 1995 | A |
5408873 | Schmidt et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5413611 | Haslam, II et al. | May 1995 | A |
5422558 | Stewart | Jun 1995 | A |
5437611 | Stern | Aug 1995 | A |
5443521 | Knoth et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5443524 | Sawamura et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5443528 | Allen | Aug 1995 | A |
5472412 | Knoth | Dec 1995 | A |
5476441 | Durfee et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5504415 | Podrazhansky et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
D372536 | Grifka | Aug 1996 | S |
5545232 | Van de Veen | Aug 1996 | A |
5545233 | Fitzlaff | Aug 1996 | A |
5551525 | Pack et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5563458 | Ericson | Oct 1996 | A |
5566479 | Gray et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5571205 | James | Nov 1996 | A |
5571210 | Lindh | Nov 1996 | A |
5571212 | Cornelius | Nov 1996 | A |
5571213 | Allen | Nov 1996 | A |
5583476 | Langford et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5586557 | Nelson et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5624389 | Zepf | Apr 1997 | A |
5642096 | Leyerer et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5645590 | Van de Veen | Jul 1997 | A |
5645752 | Weiss et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5650704 | Pratt et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5656915 | Eaves | Aug 1997 | A |
D383542 | Wellershaus et al. | Sep 1997 | S |
5662693 | Johnson et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5670077 | Carlson et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5678448 | Fullen et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5683615 | Munoz | Nov 1997 | A |
5695527 | Allen | Dec 1997 | A |
5704945 | Wagner et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5704946 | Greene | Jan 1998 | A |
5711746 | Carlson | Jan 1998 | A |
5728170 | Becker et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5728174 | Fitzlaff | Mar 1998 | A |
5746774 | Kramer et al. | May 1998 | A |
5749533 | Daniels | May 1998 | A |
5755812 | Becker et al. | May 1998 | A |
5755813 | Krukenberg | May 1998 | A |
5779735 | Molino | Jul 1998 | A |
5800561 | Rodriguez | Sep 1998 | A |
5800568 | Atkinson et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5810752 | Grifka | Sep 1998 | A |
5823309 | Gopalswamy et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
D402368 | Holzapfel | Dec 1998 | S |
5842547 | Carlson et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
D407490 | Zepf et al. | Mar 1999 | S |
5878851 | Carlson et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5888212 | Petrofsky et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5888213 | Sears et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5888236 | Van de Veen | Mar 1999 | A |
5888239 | Wellershaus et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5888246 | Gow | Mar 1999 | A |
5893891 | Zahedi | Apr 1999 | A |
5895430 | O'Connor | Apr 1999 | A |
5899869 | Barrack, Jr. et al. | May 1999 | A |
5900184 | Weiss et al. | May 1999 | A |
5906767 | Karol et al. | May 1999 | A |
5919149 | Allum | Jul 1999 | A |
5929332 | Brown | Jul 1999 | A |
5941913 | Woolnough et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5947238 | Jolly et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5948021 | Radcliffe | Sep 1999 | A |
5955667 | Fyfe | Sep 1999 | A |
5957981 | Grammas | Sep 1999 | A |
5960918 | Moser et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5967273 | Hampton | Oct 1999 | A |
5972035 | Blatchford | Oct 1999 | A |
5982156 | Weimer et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5998930 | Upadhyay et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6006412 | Bergmann et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6007582 | May | Dec 1999 | A |
RE36521 | Hiemisch | Jan 2000 | E |
6039091 | Rodgers et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6061577 | Andrieu et al. | May 2000 | A |
6080123 | Pansiera | Jun 2000 | A |
6086616 | Okuda et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6091977 | Tarjan et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6093162 | Fairleigh et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6095486 | Ivers et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6113642 | Petrofsky et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6117177 | Chen et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6129690 | Hamlin et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6139586 | Wagner et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6165226 | Wagner | Dec 2000 | A |
6168634 | Schmitz | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6183425 | Whalen et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6187051 | van de Veen | Feb 2001 | B1 |
D439339 | Sawatzki | Mar 2001 | S |
6195921 | Truong | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6206932 | Johnson | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6206933 | Shorter et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6241775 | Blatchford | Jun 2001 | B1 |
D446304 | Sawatzki | Aug 2001 | S |
6301964 | Fyfe et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6342076 | Lundborg | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6350286 | Atkinson et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6352144 | Brooks | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6361570 | Gow | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6373152 | Wang et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6379393 | Mavroidis et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6395193 | Kintz et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6409695 | Connelly | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6423098 | Biedermann | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6425925 | Grundel | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6430843 | Potter et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6436149 | Rincoe | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6443993 | Koniuk | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6443995 | Townsend et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6451481 | Lee et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6485519 | Meyers et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6494039 | Pratt et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6500210 | Sabolich et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6513381 | Fyfe et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6517585 | Zahedi et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6517858 | Le Moel et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6522266 | Soehren et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6537322 | Johnson et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6587728 | Fang et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6589287 | Lundborg | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6599439 | Iregar et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6602295 | Doddroe et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6610101 | Herr et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6613097 | Cooper | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6645252 | Asai et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6663673 | Christensen | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6671531 | Al-Ali et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6679920 | Biedermann et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6719806 | Zahedi et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6733180 | Nakamura | May 2004 | B2 |
6740123 | Davalli et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6740125 | Mosler | May 2004 | B2 |
6743260 | Townsend et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6755870 | Biedermann et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6761743 | Johnson | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6764520 | Herr et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6770045 | Naft et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6780343 | Hata et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6805677 | Simmons | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6811571 | Phillips | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6813582 | Levi et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
D499487 | Bedard et al. | Dec 2004 | S |
D501925 | Bedard et al. | Feb 2005 | S |
6855170 | Gramnas | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6875241 | Christensen | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6876135 | Pelrine et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6908488 | Passivaara | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6910331 | Asai et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6918308 | Biedermann | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6966882 | Horst | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6966933 | Christensen | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7025792 | Collier | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7029500 | Martin | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7042197 | Turner et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7063727 | Phillips et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7066896 | Kiselik | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7066964 | Wild | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7101487 | Hsu et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7118601 | Yasui | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7131998 | Pasolini | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7137998 | Bedard et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7147667 | Bedard | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7150762 | Caspers | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7164967 | Etienne-Cummings et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7182738 | Bonutti et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7198071 | Bisbee, III et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7209788 | Nicolelis et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7279009 | Herr et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7295892 | Herr et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7314490 | Bedard et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7381192 | Brodard | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7396337 | McBean et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7410338 | Schiele et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7410471 | Campbell et al. | Aug 2008 | B1 |
7410472 | Yakimovich et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7431737 | Ragnarsdottir et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7455696 | Bisbee, III et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7462201 | Christensen | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7485152 | Haynes et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7503900 | Goswami | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7520904 | Christensen | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7531006 | Clausen et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7552664 | Bulatowicz | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7575602 | Amirouche et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7588604 | Okuda | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7637957 | Ragnarsdóttir et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7637959 | Clausen et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7641700 | Yasui | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7655050 | Palmer et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7691154 | Asgeirsson et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7736394 | Bedard et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7799091 | Herr et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7811333 | Jónsson et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7811334 | Ragnarsdottir et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7815689 | Bedard et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7867284 | Bedard | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7896927 | Clausen et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7918808 | Simmons | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7942935 | Iversen et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7955398 | Bedard et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8007544 | Jonsson et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8048007 | Roy | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8048172 | Jonsson et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8057550 | Clausen | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8075633 | Herr et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8083807 | Auberger et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8109890 | Kamiar et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8231687 | Bedard et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8287477 | Herr et al. | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8323354 | Bedard et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8403997 | Sykes et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8435309 | Gilbert et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8657886 | Clausen et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8702811 | Ragnarsdottir et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8801802 | Oddsson et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8814949 | Gramnaes | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8852292 | Ragnarsdottir et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
20010029400 | Deffenbaugh et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020052663 | Herr et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020087216 | Atkinson et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020198604 | Schulman et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030019700 | Wittig | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030120183 | Simmons | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040064195 | Herr | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040083007 | Molino et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040193286 | Grundel | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050107889 | Bedard et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050283257 | Bisbee et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060069336 | Krebs et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060184280 | Oddsson et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060201757 | Dupuis et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060249315 | Herr et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060259153 | Harn et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070016329 | Herr et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070027557 | Jonsson et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070043449 | Herr et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070123997 | Herr et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070162152 | Herr et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20080004718 | Mosler | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080046096 | Bedard et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080097269 | Weinberg et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080306612 | Mosler | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20100113980 | Herr et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100131101 | Engeberg et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100262260 | Bedard et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100324456 | Jó nsson et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100324699 | Herr et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110106274 | Ragnarsdottir et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110125290 | Langlois | May 2011 | A1 |
20110130847 | Bedard et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110137429 | Bedard | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110224804 | Clausen et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120016492 | Clausen | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120191221 | Bedard et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120209405 | Herr et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120232672 | Ragnarsdottir et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120283844 | Langlois | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130035769 | Bedard et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130144402 | Clausen et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130204395 | Gramnaes | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130268093 | Gilbert et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130297041 | Bedard et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140243997 | Clausen et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
543277 | Dec 1973 | CH |
2043873 | Sep 1989 | CN |
1215614 | May 1999 | CN |
2400072 | Oct 2000 | CN |
3543291 | Jun 1987 | DE |
3923056 | Jan 1991 | DE |
3923057 | Jan 1991 | DE |
42 29 330 | Mar 1994 | DE |
19859931 | Jul 2007 | DE |
0358056 | Mar 1990 | EP |
0380060 | Aug 1990 | EP |
0 549 855 | Jul 1993 | EP |
0549855 | Jul 1993 | EP |
0654254 | May 1995 | EP |
0902547 | Mar 1999 | EP |
1125825 | Jan 2001 | EP |
1107420 | Jun 2001 | EP |
1 166 726 | Jan 2002 | EP |
1 169 982 | Jan 2002 | EP |
1 410 780 | Apr 2004 | EP |
1 442 704 | Aug 2004 | EP |
1 547 567 | Jun 2005 | EP |
2 293 185 | Jul 1976 | FR |
2 623 086 | May 1989 | FR |
2 816 463 | May 2002 | FR |
2 201 260 | Aug 1988 | GB |
2244006 | Nov 1991 | GB |
2 260 495 | Apr 1993 | GB |
2301776 | Dec 1996 | GB |
2 302 949 | Feb 1997 | GB |
2338653 | Dec 1999 | GB |
2343848 | May 2000 | GB |
2367753 | Apr 2002 | GB |
59-32453 | Feb 1984 | JP |
60-081530 | May 1985 | JP |
60-177102 | Sep 1985 | JP |
59-189843 | Oct 1985 | JP |
01-244748 | Sep 1989 | JP |
03-181633 | Aug 1991 | JP |
04-78337 | Mar 1992 | JP |
05-123348 | May 1993 | JP |
5-161668 | Jun 1993 | JP |
7-24766 | Jan 1995 | JP |
11-000345 | Jan 1999 | JP |
11-056885 | Mar 1999 | JP |
11056885 | Mar 1999 | JP |
11-215793 | Aug 1999 | JP |
2001-277175 | Oct 2001 | JP |
2001277175 | Oct 2001 | JP |
2002-191654 | Jul 2002 | JP |
2002-219141 | Aug 2002 | JP |
2002533161 | Oct 2002 | JP |
2005-500 | Jan 2005 | JP |
20020041137 | Jun 2002 | KR |
1447366 | Dec 1988 | SU |
1731210 | May 1992 | SU |
WO 9406374 | Mar 1994 | WO |
WO 9409727 | May 1994 | WO |
WO 9526171 | Oct 1995 | WO |
WO 9639110 | Dec 1996 | WO |
WO 9641599 | Dec 1996 | WO |
WO 9700661 | Jan 1997 | WO |
WO 9727822 | Aug 1997 | WO |
WO 9838951 | Sep 1998 | WO |
WO 9900075 | Jan 1999 | WO |
WO 9905991 | Feb 1999 | WO |
WO 9908621 | Feb 1999 | WO |
WO 9955261 | Nov 1999 | WO |
WO 0027318 | May 2000 | WO |
WO 0030572 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO 0038599 | Jul 2000 | WO |
WO 0117466 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO0154630 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO 0172245 | Oct 2001 | WO |
WO 02080825 | Oct 2002 | WO |
WO 03003953 | Jan 2003 | WO |
WO 03088373 | Oct 2003 | WO |
WO 2004017890 | Mar 2004 | WO |
WO 2005051248 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO2005087144 | Sep 2005 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 60/395,938, filed Jul. 15, 2002. |
Australian Search Report, Nov. 25, 2005. |
European Office Action dated Aug. 17, 2009 in Application No. 04 802 212.3, filed Nov. 25, 2004. |
Indian Office Action dated Oct. 13, 2008 in Application No. 1424/KOLNP/2006, filed May 26, 2006. |
International Preliminary Report and Written Opinion, PCT/CA2004/002035, filed Nov. 25, 2004, date of issuance May 29, 2006. |
Dietl, H., Der Einsatz von Elektronik bei Prothesen zur Versorgung der unteren Extremitat, Med. Orth. Tech. 117 (1997) 31-35. |
English translation of EP 1 169 982 A1. |
English translation of Ota, JP 2002-191654 A. |
EPO—International Search Report, Dec. 5, 2003, PCT/CA03/00902. |
Flowers et al., Journal of Biomechanical Engineering: Transactions of the ASME: Feb. 1977, pp. 3-8. |
Japanese Office Action dated Apr. 6, 2010, Patent Application No. 2006-540123, 5 pages. |
Canadian Office Action dated Apr. 9, 2010 in Application No. 2,546,858. |
Chinese Office Action dated Jun. 24, 2010 in Application No. 20040039143.8, filed Nov. 25, 2004. |
Blaya, Force-Controllable Ankle Foot Orthosis (AFO) to Assist Drop Foot Gait, Feb. 2003 (believed to be catalogued on or after Jul. 8, 2003). |
Flowers et al., “An Electrohydraulic Knee-Torque Controller . . . ”; J. Biomed. Eng., Transaction of the ASME; Feb. 1977; pp. 3-8. |
Hanafusa et al., “A Robot Hand with Elastic Fingers and Its Application to Assembly Process,” pp. 337-359, Robot Motion, Brady et al., MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1982. |
Howard, “Joint and Actuator Design for Enhanced Stability in Robotic Force Control,” Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Inst. of Technology, Dept. of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 1990. |
Pfeffer et al. , “Experiments with a Dual-Armed, Cooperative, Flexible-Drivetrain Robot System,” Proc. 1993 IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics & Automation, vol. 3, pp. 601-608, May 5, 1993. |
Rapport De Recherche Europeenne EP 01169982, mailed on Nov. 6, 2001. |
Sugano et al., “Force Control of the Robot Finger Joint equipped with Mechanical Compliance Adjuster,” Proc. 1992 IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Intell. Robots & Sys., pp. 2005-2013, Jul. 1992. |
Murray, Ph.D., M.P., et al., Walking Patterns of Normal Men, The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 46-A(2):335-360, Mar. 1964. |
Abbas, J.J., et al., Neural Network Control of Functional Neuromuscular Stimulation Systems: Computer Stimulation Studies, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 42(11), Nov. 1995. |
Aminian, K., et al., Estimation of Speed and Incline of Walking Using Neural Network, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 44(3):743-746, Jun. 1995. |
Andrews, B.J., et al., Hybrid FES Orthosis Incorporating Closed Loop Control and Sensory Feedback, J. Biomed. Eng. 10:189-195, Apr. 1988. |
Bachmann, E., et al., Inertial and Magnetic Tracking of Limb Segment Orientation for Inserting Humans into Synthetic Environments, Naval Postgraduate School Dissertation, Dec. 2000. |
Bar, A., et al., Adaptive Microcomputer Control of an Artificial Knee in Level Walking, J. Biomechanical Eng. 5:145-150, Apr. 1983. |
Baten, C., et al., Inertial Sensing in Ambulatory Back Load Estimation, 18th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Amsterdam, 1996, pp. 497-498. |
Blumentritt, Ph.D., S., et al. Design Principles, Biomedical Data and Clinical Experience with a Polycentric Knee Offering Controlled Stance Phase Knee Flexion: A Preliminary Report, Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics 9(1)18-24, 1997. |
Bogert, A., et al., A Method for Inverse Dynamic Analysis Using Accelerometry, J. Biomechanics 29(7):949-954, 1996. |
Bortz, J., A New Mathematical Formulation for Strapdown Inertial Navigation, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems AES-7(1), Jan. 1971. |
Bouten, C.V., et al., A Triaxial Accelerometer and Portable Data Processing Unit for the Assessment of Daily Physical Activity, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 44(3):136-147, Mar. 1997. |
Bouten, C.V., et al., Assessment of Energy Expenditure for Physical Activity Using a Triaxial Accelerometer, Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 26(12), Aug. 1994, 1516-1523. |
Carlson, J.D., et al., Smart Prosthetics Based on Magnetorheological Fluids, Proceedings of the 8th Annual Symposium on Smart Structures and Materials, Newport Beach, CA, Mar. 2001. |
C-Leg System, Otto Bock, available at http://web.archive.org/web/20040215152410/http:/www.ottobockus.com/products/lower—limb—prosthetics/c-leg.asp, retrieved Mar. 8, 2013. |
Copes/Bionic Ankle, Copes, Inc., copyright 1985. |
Crago, P.E., et al., New Control Strategies for Neuroprosthetic Systems, Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development 33(2), Apr. 1996, 158-172. |
Dai, R., et al., Application of Tilt Sensors in Functional Electrical Stimulation, IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering 4(2):63-71, Jun. 1996. |
European Search Report in European Application No. 12178503.4, Nov. 20, 2012. |
Fisekovic, N. et al., New Controller for Functional Electrical Stimulation Systems, Medical Engineering & Physics 23:391-399, 2000. |
Foerster, F., et al., Detection of Posture and Motion by Accelerometry: A Validation Study in Ambulatory Monitoring, Computers in Human Behavior 15:571-583, 1999. |
Foxlin, E., et al., Miniature 6-DOF Inertial System for Tracking HMDs, SPIE 3362, Helmet and Head-Mounted Displays III, AeroSense 98, Orlando, FL, Apr. 13-14, 1998. |
Frank, K., et al., Reliable Real-Time Recognition of Motion Related Human Activities Using MEMS Inertial Sensors, 2010. |
Fujita, K., et al., Joint Angle Control with Command Filter for Human Ankle Movement Using Functional Electrical Stimulation, Proceedings of the 9th Annual Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Boston, MA, Nov. 13-16, 1987. |
Gelat, T., et al., Adaptation of the Gait Initiation Process for Stepping on to a New Level Using a Single Step, Exp. Brain Res. 133:538-546, 2000. |
Graps, A., An Introduction to Wavelets, IEEE Computational Science & Engineering, pp. 50-61, Summer 1995. |
Grimes, D., An Active Multi-Mode Above-Knee Prosthesis Controller, Doctoral Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Jun. 1979, 158 pages. |
Gronqvist, R., et al., Human-Centered Approaches in Slipperiness Measurement, Ergonomics 44(13):1167-1199, Oct. 20, 2001. |
Hanson, J.P., et al., Predicting Slips and Falls Considering Required and Available Friction, Ergonomics 42(12):1619-1633, 1999. |
Hayes, W.C., et al., Leg Motion Analysis During Gait by Multiaxial Accelerometry: Theoretical Foundations and Preliminary Validations, Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 105:283-289, Aug. 1983. |
Herr, H., et al., Patient-Adaptive Prosthetic and Orthotic Leg Systems, Proceedings of the 12th Nordic Baltic Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Medical Physics and Proceedings of the International Federation for Medical & Biological Engineering, 2002. |
Herr, H., et al., User-Adaptive Control of a Magnetorheological Prosthetic Knee, Industrial Robot: An International Journal 30(1):42-55, 2003. |
Herr, H., Presentation at Experiencing the Frontiers of Biomedical Technology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, Mar. 10-11, 2003, 1 page. |
Heyn, A., et al., The Kinematics of the Swing Phase Obtained From Accelerometer and Gyroscope Measurements, 18th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Amsterdam, 1996, pp. 463-464. |
Hill, S.W., et al., Altered Kinetic Strategy for the Control of Swing Limb Elevation Over Obstacles in Unilateral Below-Knee Amputee Gait, Journal of Biomechanics 32:545-549, 1999. |
Jonic, S., et al., Three Machine Learning Techniques for Automatic Determination of Rules to Control Locomotion, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 46(3):300-310, Mar. 1999. |
Kidder, S.M., et al., A System for the Analysis of Foot and Ankle Kinematics During Gait. IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering 4(1):25-32, Mar. 1996. |
Kirkwood, C.A., et al., Automatic Detection of Gait Events: A Case Study Using Inductive Learning Techniques J. Biomed. Eng. 11:511-516, 1989. |
Kirsner, S., A Step in the Right Direction Biomedical Horizons Expanding, Boston Globe, Mar. 17, 2003. |
Kostov, A., et al., Machine Learning in Control of Functional Electrical Stimulation Systems for Locomotion, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 42(6):543-551, Jun. 1995. |
Kuster, M.D., M., et al., Kinematic and Kinetic Comparison of Downhill and Level Walking, Clinical Biomechanics 10(2):79-84, 1995. |
Lafortune, M.A., Three Dimensional Acceleration of the Tibia During Walking and Running, J. Biomechanics 24(10)877-886, 1991. |
Lee, S., and K. Mase, Activity and Location Recognition Using Wearable Sensors, Pervasive Computing, IEEE, 2002, pp. 24-32. |
Light, L.H., et al., Skeletal Transients on Heel Strike in Normal Walking with Different Footwear, J. Biomechanics 13:477-480, 1980. |
Luinge, H.J., Inertial Sensing of Movement, Doctoral Thesis, Twente University Press, Enschede, The Netherlands, 2002, pp. 9-13. (88 pages). |
Magnetic Fluid Improves Mobility of Prosthetic Leg, Advanced Materials & Processes 9(161): 29-30, Sep. 2003. |
Martin, J.J., Electronically Controlled Magnetorheological Fluid Prosthetic Foot, U.S. Appl. No. 60/371,974, filed Apr. 12, 2002. |
Mayagoitia, R.E., et al., Accelerometer and Rate Gyroscope Measurement of Kinematics: An Inexpensive Alternative to Optical Motion Analysis Systems, Journal of Biomechanics 35:537-542, 2002. |
Moe-Nilssen, R., A New Method for Evaluating Motor Control in Gait Under Real-Life Environmental Conditions, Part 1: The Instrument, Clinical Biomechanics 13:320-327, 1998. |
Moe-Nilssen, R., A New Method for Evaluating Motor Control in Gait Under Real-Life Environmental Conditions, Part 2: Gait Analysis, Clinical Biomechanics 13:328-335, 1998. |
Morris, J.R.W., Accelerometry—A Technique for the Measurement of Human Body Movements, J. Biomechanics 6:729-736, 1973. |
Moseley, A.M., et al., High- and Low-Ankle Flexibility and Motor Task Performance, Gait and Posture 18:73-80, 2003. |
Nadeau, S., et al., Frontal and Sagittal Plane Analyses of the Stair Climbing Task in Healthy Adults Aged Over 40 Years: What Are the Challenges Compared to Level Walking? Clinical Biomechanics 18:950-959, 2003. |
Nakagawa, A., Intelligent Knee Mechanism and the Possibility to Apply the Principle to the Other Joints, Proceedings of the 20th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society 20(5):2282-2287, Dec. 1998. |
C-Leg Fitting Statistics, Abstract, Otto Bock Orthopadische Industrie GmbH & Co., Mar. 2000, 4 pages. |
C-Leg: A New Dimension in Amputee Mobility, Otto Bock Data Sheet, Otto Bock Orthopadische Industrie, copyright 1997, 4 pages. |
The Electronic C-Leg Compact Leg Prosthesis System, Instructions for Use, Otto Bock Orthopadische Industrie, copyright 2002, 28 pages. |
The Electronic C-Leg Knee Joint System, Instructions for Use, Otto Bock Orthopadische Industrie, copyright 2002, available at http://www.ottobockus.com/products/lower—limb—prosthetics/c-leg—instructions.pdg, retrieved Jul. 20, 2006, 32 pages. |
Otto, J., Prosthetic Knees: What's Currently New and Impressive? The O&P Edge, available at http://www.oandp.com/edge/issues/articles/2003-10—03.asp, 4 pages (printed Oct. 2003). |
Otto, J. Prosthetic Knees: What's on the Way? The O&P edge, http://www.oandp.com/edge/issues/articles/2003-10—02 .asp, Oct. 2003, 5 pages. |
Petrofsky, J.S., et al., Feedback Control System for Walking in Man, Comput. Biol. Med. 14(2):135-149, 1984. |
Popovic, D., et al., Control Aspects of Active Above-Knee Prosthesis, International Journal of Man-Machine Machine Studies 35(6)751-767, Dec. 1991. |
Powers, C.M., Ph.D., et al., Stair Ambulation in Persons With Transtibial Amputation: An Analysis of the Seattle LightFoot, Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development 34(1):9-18, Jan. 1997. |
Rao, S.S., et al., Segment Velocities in Normal and Transtibial Amputees: Prosthetic Design Implications, IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering 6(2):219-226, Jun. 1998. |
Redfern, M.S., et al., Biomechanics of Descending Ramps, Gait and Posture 6:119-125, 1997. |
Reiner, R., et al., Stair Ascent and Descent at Different Inclinations, Gait and Posture 15:32-44, 2002. |
Reitman, J.S., et al., Gait Analysis in Prosthetics: Opinions, Ideas, and Conclusions, Prosthetics and Orthotics International 26:50-57, 2002. |
Robinson, D.W., Design and Analysis of Series Elasticity in Closed-Loop Actuator Force Control, MIT Department of Mechanical Engineering, Jun. 1996. |
Robinson, D.W., et al., Series Elastic Actuator Development for a Biomimetic Walking Robot, MIT Leg Laboratory, 1999. |
Schmalz, T., et al., Energy Efficiency of Trans-Femoral Amputees Walking on Computer-Controlled Prosthetic Knee Joint “C-Leg,” Proceedings of the International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics, 1998. |
Sekine, M. et al., Classification of Waist-Acceleration Signals in a Continuous Walking Record, Medical Engineering & Physics 22:285-291, 2000. |
Sin, S.W., et al., Significance of Non-Level Walking on Transtibial Prosthesis Fitting with Particular Reference to the Effects of Anterior-Posterior Alignment, Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development 38(1)1-6, Jan./Feb. 2001. |
Smidt, G.L., et al., An Automated Accelerometry System for Gait Analysis, J. Biomechanics 10:367-375, 1977. |
State-of-the-Art Prosthetic Leg Incorporates Magneto-Rheological Technology, Medical Product Manufacturing News, Nov. 2000, p. 42. |
Suga, T., et al., Newly Designed Computer Controlled Knee-Ankle-Foot Orthosis (Intelligent Orthosis), Prosthetics and Orthotics International 22:230-239, 1998. |
Thakkar, S., Energy Economy Gait Analysis of an Autoadaptive Prosthetic Knee, Master's Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, copyright 2002, 58 pages. |
Tomovic, R., et al., A Finite State Approach to the Synthesis of Bioengineering Control Systems, IEEE Transactions on Human Factors in Electronics HFE-7(2):65-69, Jun. 1966. |
Tong, K.Y., and M.H. Granat, A Practical Gait Analysis System Using Gyroscopes, Medical Engineering & Physics 21(2):87-94, Mar. 1999. |
Tong, K.Y., and M.H. Granat, Virtual Artificial Sensor Technique for Functional Electrical Stimulation, Medical Engineering & Physics 20:458-468, 1998. |
Townsend, M.A., et al., Biomechanics and Modeling of Bipedal Climbing and Descending, Journal of Biomechanics 9(4):227-239, 1976. |
Van Der Kooij, H., et al., A Multisensory Integration Model of Human Stance Control, Biol. Cybern. 80:299-308, 1999. |
Van Der Loos, H.F.M., et al., ProVAR Assistive Robot System Architecture, Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation, Detroit, MI, May 1999, pp. 741-746. |
Veltink, P.H., et al., Detection of Static and Dynamic Activities Using Uniaxial Accelerometers, IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering 4(4):375-385, 1996. |
Veltink, P.H., et al., The Feasibility of Posture and Movement Detection by Accelerometry, in 15th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Oct. 28-31, 1993, San Diego, CA, pp. 1230-1231. |
Wilkenfeld, Ph.D., A., An Auto-Adaptive External Knee Prosthesis, Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, Sep. 2000, 3 pages. |
Wilkenfeld, Ph.D., A., Biologically Inspired Autoadaptive Control of a Knee Prosthesis, Dissertation Abstract, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, Sep. 2000, 1 page. |
Willemsen, A.Th.M., et al., Automatic Stance-Swing Phase Detection from Accelerometer Data for Peroneal Nerve Stimulation, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 37(12):1201-1208, Dec. 1990. |
Willemsen, A.Th.M., et al., Real-Time Gait Assessment Utilizing a New Way of Accelerometry. J. Biomechanics 23(8):859-863, 1990. |
Williamson, M.M., Series Elastic Actuators, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, A.I. Technical Report No. 1524, Jan. 1995, pp. 1-83. |
Woodward, M.I., et al., Skeletal Accelerations Measured During Different Exercises, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering Medicine, 207:79-85, 1993. |
Wu, G., The Study of Kinematic Transients in Locomotion Using the Integrated Kinematic Sensor, IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering 4(3):193-200, Sep. 1996. |
Carlson, J. David, What makes a Good MR Fluid?, 8th International Conference on Electrorheological (ER) Fluids and magnetorheological (MR) Suspensions, Nice 7 pages, Jul. 9-13, 2001. |
Flowers, W.C., A Man-Interactive Simulator System for Above-Knee Prosthetics Studies, Aug. 1972. |
Perry, Jacquelin, MD, Gait Analysis: Normal and Pathological Function, 1992. |
Sowell, T.T., A Preliminary Clinical Evaluation of the Mauch Hydraulic Foot-Ankle System, 5 Prosthetics and Orthotics International 87 (1981). |
Lelas, et al., Hydraulic versus Magnetorheological-based Electronic Knee Protheses: A Clinical Comparison, Harvard Medical School, Dept. of Phys. Med. And Rehab., Boston, MA, 2004, pp. 1-16. |
Martens, W.L.J.; “Exploring Information Content and Some Application of Body Mounted Piezo-Resistive Accelerometers,” In P.H. Veltink, & R.C. van Lummel (Eds.), Dynamic analysis using body fixed sensors, Second World Congress of Biomechanics, Amsterdam, 1994, pp. 9-12. |
Popovik, D. et al.; Optimal control for an Above-Knee Prosthesis With Two Degrees of Freedom, 1995, pp. 89-98, Jo. Biomechanics, vol. 28, No. 1. |
Proteor, Assembly and Adjustment Instructions for IP50-R, pp. 1-21, Sep. 2004. |
Hashimoto et al., “An instrumented compliant wrist using a parallel mechanism,” Japan/USA Symposium on Flexible Automation, vol. 1, pp. 741-744, ASME, 1992. |
Au et al., “An EMG-Position Controlled System for an Active Ankle-Foot Prosthesis: An Initial Experimental Study,” Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, Chicago, IL, Jun. 28-Jul. 1, 2005, pp. 375-379. |
Sigurdsson et al., 12th Nordic Baltic Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Medical Physics : 12 NBC 2002; Jun. 18-22, 2002, Reykjavik, Iceland; regional meeting of IFMBE. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100262260 A1 | Oct 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60405281 | Aug 2002 | US | |
60424261 | Nov 2002 | US | |
60453556 | Mar 2003 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10721764 | Nov 2003 | US |
Child | 12815166 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10463495 | Jun 2003 | US |
Child | 10721764 | US |